DOCSLIB.ORG

Aircraft Position in December 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PT PELITA AIR SERVICE 2 Laporan Tahunan 2013 Annual Report Cerita Sampul Cover Story Tahun 2013 merupakan tahun peningkatan bagi PT Pelita Air Service (PT PAS) dalam menumbuhkan dan mengukuhkan komitmen untuk terus meningkatkan kinerjanya. Dengan terus menanamkan dan menerapkan 5C sebagai tata nilai perusahaan: Clean, Compliance, Customer care, Competitive, dan Confident, PT PAS secara konsisten berupaya untuk menuju ke tingkat yang lebih tinggi lagi. Melalui nilai-nilai tersebut, serta didukung dengan kualitas dari setiap sumber daya manusia yang unggul, PT PAS berhasil meningkatkan kinerja dan mencatatkan peningkatannya pada tahun 2013. Gambar sebuah pesawat yang tengah lepas landas pada sampul Laporan Tahunan 2013, mengilustrasikan kesiapan serta komitmen PT PAS untuk terus tumbuh, meninggi dan meningkat menjadi perusahaan yang lebih baik dalam kinerjanya, kualitas pelayanan, sekaligus dalam mewujudkan visi dan misinya. Daftar Isi Table of Contents KILAS KINERJA 2013 LAPORAN KEPADA PEMEGANG SAHAM KEY PERFORMANCE 2013 REPORT TO THE SHAREHOLDERS 8 Ikhtisar Keuangan 14 Laporan Dewan Komisaris Financial Highlights The Board of Commissioners’ Report 11 Ikhtisar Operasional 20 Laporan Direksi Operational Highlights The Board of Directors’ Report 11 Informasi Saham dan Obligasi Information on Shares and Bonds PROFIL PERUSAHAAN COMPANY PROFILE 28 Profil PT PAS 40 Profil Direksi 53 PT Indopelita Aircraft Services Profile of PT PAS Profiles of the Board of Directors PT Indopelita Aircraft Services 29 Alamat Kantor Pusat, Entitas Anak 46 Komposisi Dewan Komisaris 54 Kronologis Pencatatan Saham dan Entitas Asosiasi Composition of the Board of Commissioners Chronology of Share Listing Address of Head Office, Subsidiaries and Associated Companies 46 Komposisi Direksi 54 Kronologis Pencatatan Efek Lainnya dan Peringkat Efek Composition of the Board of Directors Chronology of Securities Listing and Credit Rating 30 Riwayat Singkat Perusahaan Company’s Brief History 46 Komposisi Sumber Daya Manusia 55 Nama dan Alamat Lembaga dan Human Resources Composition atau Profesi Penunjang Pasar Modal 32 Kegiatan Usaha 48 Pengembangan Kompetensi Name and Address of Agencies and/or Business Activities Capital Market Supporting Professionals Competency Development 33 Struktur Organisasi 51 Kesejahteraan Pekerja 55 Akuntan Independen Perseroan Organization Structure Employee Welfare Company Independent Accountant 34 Visi, Misi, dan Tata Nilai 52 Komposisi Pemegang Saham 56 Penghargaan dan Sertifikasi Vision, Mission, and Core Values Shareholder Composition Awards and Certifications 36 Profil Dewan Komisaris 52 Informasi Entitas Anak dan Entitas Asosiasi 58 Rangkaian Peristiwa Penting 2013 Profiles of the Board of Commissioners Information of Subsidiaries and Affiliated Companies Event Highlights of 2013 PT PELITA AIR SERVICE Laporan Tahunan 2013 Annual Report 3 2013 was a year of improvement for PT Pelita Air Service (PT PAS) in growing and confirming the commitment to continuously improve its performance. By continuously implementing 5C as the corporate values: Clean, Compliance, Customer care, Competitive and Confident, PT PAS has consistently tried to climb to a higher level. Through those values, and supported by the qualified human resources, PT PAS successfully managed to increase its performance and recorded improvement in 2013. The picture of a plane in taking off position on the cover of Annual Report 2013, illustrates the readiness and commitment of PT PAS to keep growing, climbing and rising to be a better company in its performance, quality of services, as well as in realizing its vision and mission. ANALISA & PEMBAHASAN MANAJEMEN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL & MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS LINGKUNGAN PERUSAHAAN 62 Analisa Kinerja Operasi CORPORATE SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL Operational Performance Analysis RESPONSIBILITIES 70 Posisi Pesawat Bulan Desember 2013 172 Tanggung Jawab Lingkungan Aircraft Position in December 2013 Enviromental Responsibility 72 Analisa Kinerja Keuangan 173 Kerja, Kesehatan, dan Keselamatan Financial Performance Review Employment, Health, and Safety 173 Pengembangan Sosial dan Komunitas TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN Social and Community Development GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 88 Struktur Tata Kelola Perusahaan 122 Unit Audit Internal The Structure of Good Corporate Governance Internal Audit Unit 175 89 Uraian Dewan Komisaris 127 Analis Manajemen Risiko dan Investasi The Board of Commissioners Investment and Risk Management Analyst SURAT PERNYATAAN ANGGOTA 94 Uraian Direksi 128 Perencana Strategi dan Budget Senior DEWAN KOMISARIS DAN DIREKSI The Board of Directors Strategy and Budget Senior Planner ATAS LAPORAN TAHUNAN 2013 107 Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham 130 Kode Etik Perusahaan RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT OF General Meeting of Shareholders The Code of Ethics THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND DIRECTORS ON ANNUAL REPORT 2013 109 Asesmen Terhadap Anggota 144 Sistem Manajemen Risiko Dewan Komisaris dan/atau Direksi Risk Management System Assessment of the Members of Board of Commissioners and/or Directors 146 Sistem Whistleblowing 115 Komite Audit Whistleblowing System Audit Committee 153 Gratifikasi 179 118 Komite-komite Lain di Bawah Dewan Gratification Komisaris yang Dimiliki oleh Perusahaan LAPORAN KEUANGAN KONSOLIDASI 157 Benturan Kepentingan Other Committees under the Board of CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT Commissioners Owned by the Company Conflict of Interest 119 Sekretaris Perusahaan 160 Kecelakaan dalam Perusahaan Corporate Secretary HSE (Health, Safety and Environment) 121 Kegiatan Hubungan Investor di Tahun 2013 168 Perkara Penting yang Dihadapi PA S REFERENSI PERATURAN Investor Relations Activities in Year 2013 Important Matters Confronting PAS BAPEPAM-LK NO. X.K.6 121 Sistem Pengendalian Internal 169 Akses terhadap Informasi BAPEPAM-LK NO. X.K.6 Internal Control Systems Access to Information CROSS REFERENCE PT PELITA AIR SERVICE 4 Laporan Tahunan 2013 Annual Report KILAS KINERJA 2013 Key Performance 2013 KILAS KINERJA 2013 LAPORAN KEPADA PEMEGANG SAHAM PROFIL PERUSAHAAN Key Performance 2013 Report to the Shareholders Company Profile PT PELITA AIR SERVICE Laporan Tahunan 2013 Annual Report 5 ANALISA DAN PEMBAHASAN MANAJEMEN TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL DAN LINGKUNGAN PERUSAHAAN Management Discussion and Analysis Good Corporate Governance Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibilities PT PELITA AIR SERVICE 6 Laporan Tahunan 2013 Annual Report PADA TAHUN 2013, PT PAS BERHASIL MEMBUKUKAN PENDAPATAN SEBESAR USD80.176.731, LABA SETELAH PAJAK USD5.663.062 DAN JUMLAH ASET SEBESAR USD85.877.242. In 2013, PT PAS has recorded Revenues of USD80,176,731, Net Income After Tax of USD5,663,062 and Total Assets of USD85,877,242. 80.176.731 16.514.270 7.774.929 73.097.989 56.500.514 14.874.907 4.407.459 3.730.549 13.769.549 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 Pendapatan Laba Kotor Laba Sebelum Pajak Revenues Gross Profit Income Before Tax dalam Dolar AS in US Dollar dalam Dolar AS in US Dollar dalam Dolar AS in US Dollar KILAS KINERJA 2013 LAPORAN KEPADA PEMEGANG SAHAM PROFIL PERUSAHAAN Key Performance 2013 Report to the Shareholders Company Profile PT PELITA AIR SERVICE Laporan Tahunan 2013 Annual Report 7 83.832.260 32 5.663.062 70.407.137 27 57.706.975 20 3.007.818 2.279.477 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 Laba Setelah Pajak Jumlah Aset Jumlah Armada Net Income After Tax Total Assets Total Fleets dalam Dolar AS in US Dollar dalam Dolar AS in US Dollar ANALISA DAN PEMBAHASAN MANAJEMEN TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL DAN LINGKUNGAN PERUSAHAAN Management Discussion and Analysis Good Corporate Governance Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibilities PT PELITA AIR SERVICE 8 Laporan Tahunan 2013 Annual Report Ikhtisar Keuangan Financial Highlights URAIAN 2013 2012 2011 DESCRIPTION LAPORAN LABA RUGI CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS dalam Dolar AS in US Dollar KOMPREHENSIF KONSOLIDASIAN OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Pendapatan 80.176.731 73.097.989 56.500.514 Revenues Beban Langsung 63.662.461 58.223.082 42.730.965 Direct Costs Laba Kotor 16.514.270 14.874.907 13.769.549 Gross Profit Laba Sebelum Pajak 7.774.929 4.407.459 3.730.549 Profit Before Tax Laba Setelah Pajak 5.663.062 3.007.818 2.279.477 Profit After Tax Laba Komprehensif 5.735.939 3.147.513 2.164.957 Comprehensive Income Laba per Saham (Dolar AS) - - - Earnings per Share (US Dollar) LAPORAN POSISI KEUANGAN CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS dalam Dolar AS in US Dollar KONSOLIDASIAN OF FINANCIAL POSITION Aset Lancar 48.699.665 45.898.483 34.856.825 Current Assets Aset Tidak Lancar 35.132.595 24.508.653 22.850.150 Non Current Assets Jumlah Aset 83.832.260 70.407.137 57.706.975 Total Assets Liabilitas Jangka Pendek 39.467.889 39.828.284 33.486.850 Current Liabilities Liabilitas Jangka Panjang 17.398.410 9.348.830 6.137.615 Non Current Liabilities Jumlah Liabilitas 56.866.299 49.177.114 39.624.465 Total Liabilities Jumlah Ekuitas 26.965.961 21.230.023 18.082.510 Total Equity Jumlah Liabilitas dan Ekuitas 83.832.260 70.407.137 57.706.975 Total Liabilities and Equity RASIO KEUANGAN dalam % in % FINANCIAL RATIOS Rasio Lancar 123,39 115,24 104,56 Current Ratio Rasio Total Hutang 67,83 69,85 62,24 Total Debt to Total Assets Ratio terhadap Total Aktiva Marjin Laba Bersih 6,54 4,31 3,08 Net Profit Margin Rasio Kewajiban 210,88 231,64 164,86 Total Debt to Total Equity Ratio terhadap Ekuitas Marjin Laba Kotor 20,60 3,69 2,65 Operating Profit Margin KILAS KINERJA 2013 LAPORAN KEPADA PEMEGANG SAHAM PROFIL PERUSAHAAN Key Performance 2013 Report to the Shareholders
Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf

    Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf

    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
  • With the Potential of Secondary Airports of Po

    With the Potential of Secondary Airports of Po

    Original Article Study of the multi-airport system in "Greater Jakarta" with the potential of secondary airports of Pondok Cabe or Budiarto Tri Sefrus1*, Sigit Priyanto2, Dewanti2, and Muhammad Zudhy Irawan2 1Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin SH, Bengkulu, 38115, Indonesia. 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia * Corresponding author : [email protected] Abstract Soekarno-Hatta International Airport is a major hub airport that serves as a transit point from 364 indirect domestic flight routes and serves more than 48 million air passengers annually. To cope with the enormous demand, in 2014 the Indonesian government opened Halim Perdana Kusuma Airport for commercial services, which was previously the headquarters of the Indonesian Air Force Operations Command. The current capacity is no longer able to serve the current demand. Taking the existence of the closest non-commercial airports into consideration, this study aims to determine how much potential passenger sharing would be if a multi-airport system was implemented. The approach is carried out using Jovanovic's theory and Ministerial Regulation No. 39 of 2019. The results indicated the Pondok Cabe and Budiarto predicted to be able to accommodate the generation of air passengers in the Greater Jakarta areas are 21-55% and 19-51% respectively. Keywords: Multi airport system, Soekarno-Hatta, passenger sharing. 1. Introduction Soekarno-Hatta International Airport is located in Tangerang City, Banten province, Indonesia. Although limited by the provincial administrative area, this airport is the backbone of air transportation which serves the country's capital (Jakarta) and surrounding areas. The service area of Soekarno-Hatta Airport covers the metropolitan area of Greater Jakarta, namely Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi.
  • Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (Excluding U.S.)

    Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (Excluding U.S.)

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N JO 7340.470 NOTICE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: July 11, 2018 Cancellation Date: July 11, 2019 SUBJ: Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (excluding U.S.) 1. Purpose of This Notice. This notice modifies FAA Order JO 7340.2, Contractions, Chapter 3, Sections 1, 2, and 3, !CAO Aircraft Company Three-Letter Identifier and/or Telephony Designator. This notice reflects recent changes initiated by countries other than the United States (U.S.) including new ICAO three letter designators (3LDs), deletions ofdefunct ICAO 3LDs, and modifications to ICAO 3LDs, associated telephonies, and companies/agencies. This Notice supplements FAA Order JO 7340.2 until the additions and modifications are incorporated into the Order. This Notice does not replace or substitute for GENOTs issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Traffic Organization (ATO) for ICAO 3LDs assigned and authorized for U.S. aircraft operators. 2. Audience. This notice applies to the following Air Traffic Organization (ATO) service units: Air Traffic Services, and System Operations Services; ATO Safety and Technical Training; and all associated air traffic control facilities. This notice is informational in nature and does not require documentation as supplemental training in FAA Form 3120-1, Training and Proficiency Record. 3. Where Can I Find This Notice? This notice is available on the MyFAA employee website at https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_ notices/ and on the air traffic publications website at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. 4. Source Document. The source document for the ICAO 3LD additions and modifications contained in this notice is ICAO Document 8585, Designatorsfor Aircraft Operating Agencies, Aeronautical Authorities, and Services.
  • Vol-5, Issue 2

    Vol-5, Issue 2

    International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, Feb-2016 ISSN (2226-8235) Vol-5, Issue 2 Analysis on the Factors Causing Airlines Bankruptcy: Cases in Indonesia Author’s Details: (1)Suharto Abdul Majid-Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (2) Sucherly - Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (3) Umi Kaltum- Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia Abstract the high growth of national aviation services after the aviation deregulation in 2000 has given a positive impact on the increase of national economic activities, especially in tour and trade. In the same time, however, it negatively impacts the aviation business itself, making many airline companies stop their operation and then go to bankruptcy. The aim of this research is to analyze the factors causing bankruptcy to some national airline companies in Indonesia after the aviation deregulation in the periods of 2001-2010 and 2011-2015. It is an exploratory research with a qualitative descriptive approach emphasizing on evaluating the factors causing bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. The method of data collection is an interview with the format of focus group discussion (FGD), while the data analysis uses factor analysis method. The results of this research show that there are two main factors that cause bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. They are both internal and external factors of the companies. Key words: Airline companies bankruptcy, internal factors, and external factors. INTRODUCTION Since the implementation of the national aviation deregulation policy in 2000, the growth of aviation business in Indonesia increases rapidly.
  • RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty

    RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty

    RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty ‐ Ninth Regional Aviation Safety Group — Pan America Executive Steering Committee Meeting (RASG‐PA ESC/29) ICAO NACC Regional Office, Mexico City, Mexico, 29‐30 November 2017 Agenda Item 3: Items/Briefings of interest to the RASG‐PA ESC PROPOSAL TO AMEND ICAO FLIGHT DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMME (FDAP) RECOMMENDATION AND STANDARD TO EXPAND AEROPLANES´ WEIGHT THRESHOLD (Presented by Flight Safety Foundation and supported by Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Flight Data Analysis Program (FDAP) working group comprised by representatives of Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP, is in the process of preparing a proposal to expand the number of functional flight data analysis programs. It is anticipated that a greater number of Flight Data Analysis Programs will lead to significantly greater safety levels through analysis of critical event sets and incidents. Action: The FDAP working group is requesting support for greater implementation of FDAP/FDMP throughout the Pan American Regions and consideration of new ICAO standards through the actions outlined in Section 4 of this working paper. Strategic Safety Objectives: References: Annex 6 ‐ Operation of Aircraft, Part 1 sections as mentioned in this working paper RASG‐PA ESC/28 ‐ WP/09 presented at the ICAO SAM Regional Office, 4 to 5 May 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1 Flight Data Recorders have long been used as one of the most important tools for accident investigations such that the term “black box” and its recovery is well known beyond the aviation industry.
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal

    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
  • Flying Blind

    Flying Blind

    VAN ZORGE REPORT — FEBRUARY 8, 2007 AVIATION Flying blind s the top executives from nearly every major Indonesian airline gathered THE MEETING OF AIRLINE EXECUTIVE WAS around a table at the ministry of transportation in mid-January, a TENSE. A general feeling of irritability filled the air. The group rarely meets and certainly not on such short notice—a combination that led to a somewhat tense atmosphere, one executive at the meeting told the Report. Following the January 1 Adam Air crash, the country’s beleaguered THEY FELT IT WAS UNNECESSARY DESPITE transportation minister, Hatta Radjasa, had called the meeting to discuss the THE RECENT CRASH. country’s aviation safety procedures, which had fallen under heavy scrutiny in the wake of the recent disaster. “Some of them were grumbling,” the executive said. “They said that they knew perfectly well the government’s aviation safety procedures, and they didn’t need reminding.” Indeed, many of those aviation executives certainly have a very professional HOWEVER, ACCUSATIONS ARE RIFE THAT attitude toward air safety. But since the Adam Air tragedy, accusations have SAFETY MEASURES ARE LACKING. intensified that not all airlines in Indonesia have prioritised the safety of their passengers and crews. Some NGOs, DPR members and media outlets have recently questioned THE AVIATION INDUSTRY SEEMS TO BE TWO what they see as the development of a two-tier system within Indonesia’s TIERED IN INDONESIA. aviation industry. They say that many of the budget carriers are prioritising profit over safety while the more expensive carriers are doing a more professional job. However, the jury is still out on whether these budget carriers, which BUT THE JURY IS STILL OUT ON THE mushroomed after the industry was deregulated in the late 1990s, are operating BUDGET CARRIERS.
  • THE IMPACT of RESTRUCTURING on the AIRLINE PERFORMANCE: the Case of Garuda Indonesia

    THE IMPACT of RESTRUCTURING on the AIRLINE PERFORMANCE: the Case of Garuda Indonesia

    Výskumné štúdie THE IMPACT OF RESTRUCTURING ON THE AIRLINE PERFORMANCE: The Case of Garuda Indonesia Roberto AKYUWEN ABSTRACT: Garuda Indonesia is an airline company owned by the Indonesian Government. The airline has been vastly deve- Dr. Roberto Akyuwen loped since being established in 1950. Remarkable growth has been achieved mainly due to the fact that in the Senior Lecturer early years there was minimal competition in the airline industry in Indonesia. Being the fi rst Indonesian airline, Finance Education and Training Center Yogyakarta Garuda Indonesia monopolised the commercial air transportation services. This situation allowed more than Ministry of Finance Republic Indonesia reasonable company performance for many years. However, since the government introduction of an open do- Jl. Solo Km 11 Kalasan, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55571 INDONESIA mestic airline industry in 1990, Garuda Indonesia started to face diffi culties. Garuda competed against a number Telp. 62-274-496219, Facs. 62-274-497235 of private airlines, which possessed expansive strategies in developing routes as well as increasing the number [email protected], [email protected] of aircraft. The performance of Garuda Indonesia gradually decreased to a low when operational profi t and cash fl ow reached negative fi gures during the period 1993 to 1997. Further, the seat load factor and on time perfor- Roberto Akyuwen was born in Ambon, Indonesia on 19 March, 1970. He obtained his doctorate degree with cum mance were also worsening. To overcome these problems, restructuring was fi rst undertaken during 1998 to laude in 2003 from the Doctorate Program in Economics, Gadjah Mada University Yogyakarta. Currently, he has 2001.
  • Operation Management Is a Functional Field of Business with Clear Line Management Responsibilities

    Operation Management Is a Functional Field of Business with Clear Line Management Responsibilities

    7 CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Operations Management Operations Management is defined as the design, operation, and improvement of the systems that create and deliver the firm’s primary products and services. Like marketing and finance, operation management is a functional field of business with clear line management responsibilities. This point is important because operations management is frequently confused with operation research and management science and industrial engineering (Chase, 2001, pp.6-7). Operations management decisions at the strategic level impact the company’s long-range effectiveness in terms of how it can address its customer’s needs. Thus, for the firm to succeed, these decisions must be in alignment with the corporate strategy. Decisions made at the strategic level become the fixed conditions or operating constrains under which the term must operate in both the intermediate and short term. At the next level in the decision-making process, tactical planning primarily addresses how to efficiently schedule material and labor within the constraints of previously made strategic decisions. Issues on which Operation Management concentrates on this level include: How many workers do we need? When do we need them? Should we work overtime or put on a second shift? When should we have material delivered? Should we have a finished goods inventory? These tactical 8 decisions, in turn, become the operating constraints under which operational planning and control decisions are made (Chase, 2001, p8). 2.2 Achieving Competitive Advantage through Operations Competitive advantage implies the creation of a system that has a unique advantage over its competitors. The idea is to create customer value in an efficient and sustainable way.
  • Kinesis Capital & Investment

    Kinesis Capital & Investment

    AIRPORTS KINESIS CANADA PROVIDING YOU MORE THAN A SIMPLE IDEA, WE MAKE IT REAL THROUGH A TURN KEY SOLUTION IMAGE PLACE HOLDER Kinesis Group IN FEW WORDS An Integrated Team approach Kinesis Group works in partnership with clients to achieve their goals and expectations using a professional Match your approach and the ability to manage expectations expectations. Kinesis Group is aware that every Kinesis Group it’s more than4 majors client is unique, they have a different companies all under a same holding culture, expectations and personalities. and a banner providing a turn key solution to Government and Private Our group commitment is to provide companies you personalized services that not only match but exceed your expectations. INTRODUCTION Kinesis Group a dynamic and innovative group very active since 2012 over the world by being the first in the world to propose turn key solution for airports and infrastructure projects Kinesis Group & THIS COMPANIES Airports Kinesis Consulting Worldwide was founded in 2011 with a vision to design efficient and sustainable next-generation airports and aeronautical infrastructures. Over the past four years, we have built a strong reputation for our range of expertise and offer of comprehensive services, including airport design and management, operations evaluation aircraft consulting and planning, traffic impact studies, and airline development planning for existing operators around the world. We have rapidly expanded our services from our headquarters in Montreal to 16 countries around the world.
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb

    Global Volatility Steadies the Climb

    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
  • Pacedays 2014 | Fuel Reduction Initiatives on the Avro RJ Regional

    Pacedays 2014 | Fuel Reduction Initiatives on the Avro RJ Regional

    REGIONAL AIRCRAFT Fuel Reduction Initiatives on the Avro RJ Regional Jet Stephen Morrison and Daniel McNish © BAE SYSTEMS 2014. All rights reserved. 1 BAe Systems Regional Aircraft Regional Aircraft’s history spans 70 years in the development, production and support of many aircraft types. Whole product and through lifecycle knowledge and experience are applied to provide customers with integrated solutions. These include design, supply, repair, change, upgrade/conversion and customer support services. With services and solutions provided to over 500 aircraft operated by over 180 customers in 70 countries we have a global support organisation. We also provide services and solutions across a number of market sectors, including passenger, business and special role aircraft . 2 Regional Aircraft Operator Base Europe 223 Aircraft in Service 44 Operators North America 118 Aircraft in Service Asia 69 Operators 54 Aircraft in Service 26 Operators Africa & Middle East 92 Aircraft in Service 41 Operators South America 103 Aircraft in Service Australasia 36 Operators 30 Aircraft in Service 10 Operators 165 Operators, 620 Aircraft In Service © BAE SYSTEMS 2014. All rights reserved. 3 BAe 146 / Avro RJ Operator Base – 2014 Europe Air Go Albanian Airlines Atlantic Airways Avia Air Traffic Aviatrans K BAE Systems Brussels Airlines Bulgarian Air Cello Aviation Cityjet FAAM Flair Aviation Formula One Interaviator Malmö Aviation Olympus Airways Asia North America PAN Air QinetiQ Asian Express Airline Air Spray Royal Air Force Swiss Aviastar Air Tahoma