AL-Biruni's NOTES on INDIAN FOUR-HANDED

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AL-Biruni's NOTES on INDIAN FOUR-HANDED 2/2018 57 AL-BIRUNi’S NOTES ON INDIAN FOUR-HANDED CHESS – SOME REMARKS BY MARIA SCHETELICH Since Hiram Cox and Duncan Forbes put forth the theory that catūrāji, the In- dian four-handed dice-chess, should be regarded as “the seed from which our chess was to spring”1 that game has not ceased to be a kind of bone of conten- tion with chess historians. This is mainly due to the fact that some of its features did not fit in with the almost generally accepted classification of chess as a war game. Unfortunately, when the tradi- tional Indian four-handed dice chess was discovered for Europe by William Jones in 1790, it had already been on the verge of becoming obsolete. Written sources, allowing to reconstruct it are few, and eye-witnesses are already almost com- pletely absent.2 When Harold Murray wrote his History of Chess in 1913, it was no longer played in the way described by Al Birunī, Śūlapāni, Raghunandana or by the Caturaṅgataraṅginī. Instead a simpler variant without dice became current. The main points that prevented chess historians from accepting the older catūrāji as a possible ancestor of mod- ern two-handed chess were two: the way a player was allowed to treat his partner Four handed chess after Al Birunī (Sanskrit: mitra, friend, ally) because it seemed to go against the logic and moral of (the European notion of) warfare,3 the ….. The pieces have certain Four handed chess after Al Birunī most rigid verdict on this point coming values, according to which Murray also mentions a third point of from Paul Thieme in 2001,4 and secondly, the player gets his share of criticism: the number of the highest stake the use of dice. the stakes; for the pieces for the winner: are taken and pass into the Al Birunī (ca. 1030 A.D.) wrote: hands of the player. The val- “Al Beruni was unable to ue of the King is 5, that of the explain the reason for this “They play chess, four per- Elephant 4, of the Horse 3, of number and regarded it as sons at a time, with a pair the Rook 2 and of the Pawn a mere convention of the of dice. Their arrangement 1. He who takes a king gets game. But it is the exact val- of the figures on the chess- 5, for two Kings he gets 10, ue of the other three armies board is the following: for three Kings 15, if the win- when calculated in accord- As this kind of chess is not ner is no longer in possession ance with his figures, and known to us, I shall explain of his own king. But if he has this represents the highest what I know of it. The four still his own King, and takes score possible, and it may persons playing together all three kings, he gets 54 – a have been retained in that sit so as to form a square number which represents a way.” round the chessboard, and progression based on gen- throw the dice in rotation. eral consent and not on the …. The name of King applies algebraic principle “. here to the Firzan (minister). 58 AL-BIRUNI´S NOTES ON INDIAN FOUR-HANDED CHESS Although it does not seem so at first van der Linde largely relied for their on rule (lat. regnum, Sanskrit rājya) and sight, all three points mentioned above knowledge of the Indian chess var- not on state and its administration (lat. are not contradictory or illogical at all. It iants, could not yet have known the imperium, Sanskrit rāṣṭra), and quite only needs a change of perspective on Arthaśāstra because the text was lost naturally so, because in ancient and the game in several points, namely: for centuries and rediscovered only medieval times, the kings in India (as 1. four-handed dice chess should not in 1906, five years after Weber died. well as those in Europe) had to cope be regarded as a simpler (or, worse, But he could nevertheless have already with a vast and relatively sparsely pop- “crippled”) form of two-handed seen the close connection between ulated territory and a growing number chess, but as a variant of the game in four-handed chess and Indian political of petty monarchies, oligarchies and its own right, theory because the Nītisāra of Kaman- chiefdoms eager for expansion and 2. it should be kept in mind that the daka - the most authoritative Sanskrit more or less constantly contesting each terminology of the rules for both text on politics from about the 6th other´s aspiration to sovereignty.8 It two- and four-handed chess is that cent. onwards – was well known to is well known from inscriptions that, of classical Indian political science him, and Kamandaka took all his basic apart from periods of centralization in (Arthaśāstra, Rājanītiśāstra), concepts from the Arthaśāstra. It was times of empires (and even then), the 3. the notion of war should not be Heinrich Lüders who first suggested territories of Indian kingdoms were restricted to fighting on the battle- that there might be a link between oscillating continously. That is why at- ground, i.e. to the military aspect, but the four-handed catūrāji game and the taining (lābha), preserving (pālana) and should also include contest for su- concepts of Indian political theory. extending (vardhana) his own political premacy by employing strategies of He was followed in 1936 by Manmo- power were of prior concern to every direct and indirect confrontation. han Ghosh, the editor of Śūlapaṇi´s king and determined his political activ- Caturangadīpikā6 and later by Helmut ities. Thus, to understand the true nature Rosenfeld, G. Wichmann and Joa- of Indian four-handed chess, it might chim Petzold. Ghosh was perfectly This was the general situation to which be helpful to take a closer look on the right in calling the arrangement of the Indian political science in its initial teachings of classical Indian political four parties on the board “a sort of phase had to respond. It might not be science. From the very beginning, this very primitive type of maṇḍala (sphere by chance that tradition ascribes the science made it a matter of principle of diplomacy) ”, symbolizing “ a war first theoretical treatise on politics, the that diplomatic action and weakening carried on between two kings (vijigīṣu Arthaśāstra (further: KA), to Kauṭilya. an enemy by indirect action as well and his ari) with their two allies (mi- Although it cannot be proved that Kau- as by economic and political pressure tra and ari-mitra).“7 A closer look into ṭilya was a real historical person, tradi- from inside and outside should always the political morals of the old Indian tion has it that he was the counsellor be preferred to open armed conflicts. texts on policy and diplomacy clearly (mantrin) of king Candragupta Maurya. The dominant strategies in catūrāji - suggests that the four-handed chess He is said to have been the spiritus rec- namely obstructing the pieces of the catūrāji exactly mirrors their teachings. tor behind the activities of this king to rival king instead of capturing them Thus, Murray´s critical remarks re- gradually subdue all political powers in at any cost and the obligation to re- garding the peculiar nature of the mi- Northern India in the aftermath of the gain one´s ally-king if he was captured tra, the dice and the number 54, men- unlucky “Indian adventure” of Alex- by one of the rival-kings - perfect- tioned by Al-Birunī, can be explained ander the Great and to found the first ly matches this tendency. Moreover, best by consulting the oldest text of empire on Indian soil around 320 B.C. the peculiar treatment of the ally in this genre, the Arthaśāstra of Kauṭilya, the course of playing exactly reflects on his design of “non-violent” polit- The Arthaśāstra is highly interesting not the political moral taught in the man- ical trade in times of peace and war, only because of the vast scope of sub- uals for the guidance of kings and is elaborately dealt with in Book 6-13. jects it deals with in a systematic way, particularly close to the teachings of but also from the methodological point Kauṭilya (ca. 3rd-1st cent. B.C., see be- The mitra of view. Kauṭilya combines empirical low), who with his Arthaśāstra laid the From its very beginning in the late 4th knowledge with rational analysis and foundation to Indian political theory century B.C., classical Indian political reasoning and shows the preference and political science.5 In fact, the set- science has cultivated a rather peculiar for classifying things and the obsession up of four-handed dice chess repeats notion of war, of political behaviour with numbers that was so typical for a basic political concept that was first and of the ideal king. Like in early Indian scientific thinking from its very developed in the Arthaśāstra and stayed medieval Europe and due to similar inception.9 in continuous use up to modern times. politico-geographical conditions, the Albrecht Weber, on whom Murray and ideology of kingship was focussed AL-BIRUNI´S NOTES ON INDIAN FOUR-HANDED CHESS 59 Kauṭilya develops a theory of kingship caused by nature and men, by thiefs, rob- It has to be stressed here that the terms and governance which, due to its ana- bers, corruption, raids, attacks, invasions sandhi and vigraha, although very often lytical potential, its radical pragmatism by enemies etc. Permanence of welfare translated by “peace” and “war”, are and the nature of its political strate- and security is, of course, achieved best not real equivalents of these Europe- gies has often been called Macchia- by controlling everything and everybody.
Recommended publications
  • Games Ancient and Oriental and How to Play Them, Being the Games Of
    CO CD CO GAMES ANCIENT AND ORIENTAL AND HOW TO PLAY THEM. BEING THE GAMES OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS THE HIERA GRAMME OF THE GREEKS, THE LUDUS LATKUNCULOKUM OF THE ROMANS AND THE ORIENTAL GAMES OF CHESS, DRAUGHTS, BACKGAMMON AND MAGIC SQUAEES. EDWARD FALKENER. LONDON: LONGMANS, GEEEN AND Co. AND NEW YORK: 15, EAST 16"' STREET. 1892. All rights referred. CONTENTS. I. INTRODUCTION. PAGE, II. THE GAMES OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS. 9 Dr. Birch's Researches on the games of Ancient Egypt III. Queen Hatasu's Draught-board and men, now in the British Museum 22 IV. The of or the of afterwards game Tau, game Robbers ; played and called by the same name, Ludus Latrunculorum, by the Romans - - 37 V. The of Senat still the modern and game ; played by Egyptians, called by them Seega 63 VI. The of Han The of the Bowl 83 game ; game VII. The of the Sacred the Hiera of the Greeks 91 game Way ; Gramme VIII. Tlie game of Atep; still played by Italians, and by them called Mora - 103 CHESS. IX. Chess Notation A new system of - - 116 X. Chaturanga. Indian Chess - 119 Alberuni's description of - 139 XI. Chinese Chess - - - 143 XII. Japanese Chess - - 155 XIII. Burmese Chess - - 177 XIV. Siamese Chess - 191 XV. Turkish Chess - 196 XVI. Tamerlane's Chess - - 197 XVII. Game of the Maharajah and the Sepoys - - 217 XVIII. Double Chess - 225 XIX. Chess Problems - - 229 DRAUGHTS. XX. Draughts .... 235 XX [. Polish Draughts - 236 XXI f. Turkish Draughts ..... 037 XXIII. }\'ci-K'i and Go . The Chinese and Japanese game of Enclosing 239 v.
    [Show full text]
  • CHESS MASTERPIECES: (Later, in Europe, Replaced by a HIGHLIGHTS from the DR
    CHESS MASTERPIECES: (later, in Europe, replaced by a HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE DR. queen). These were typically flanKed GEORGE AND VIVIAN DEAN by elephants (later to become COLLECTION bishops), though in this case, they are EXHIBITION CHECKLIST camels with drummers; cavalrymen (later to become Knights); and World Chess Hall of Fame chariots or elephants, (later to Saint Louis, Missouri 2.1. Abstract Bead anD Dart Style Set become rooKs or “castles”). A September 9, 2011-February 12, with BoarD, India, 1700s. Natural and frontline of eight foot soldiers 2012 green-stained ivory, blacK lacquer- (pawns) completed each side. work folding board with silver and mother-of-pearl. This classical Indian style is influenced by the Islamic trend toward total abstraction of the design. The pieces are all lathe- turned. The blacK lacquer finish, made in India from the husKs of the 1.1. Neresheimer French vs. lac insect, was first developed by the Germans Set anD Castle BoarD, Chinese. The intricate inlaid silver Hanau, Germany, 1905-10. Silver and grid pattern traces alternating gilded silver, ivory, diamonds, squares filled with lacy inscribed fern sapphires, pearls, amethysts, rubies, leaf designs and inlaid mother-of- and marble. pearl disKs. These decorations 2.3. Mogul Style Set with combine a grid of squares, common Presentation Case, India, 1800s. Before WWI, Neresheimer, of Hanau, to Western forms of chess, with Beryl with inset diamonds, rubies, Germany, was a leading producer of another grid of inlaid center points, and gold, wooden presentation case ornate silverware and decorative found in Japanese and Chinese clad in maroon velvet and silk-lined.
    [Show full text]
  • Birth of the Chess Queen C Marilyn Yalom for Irv, Who Introduced Me to Chess and Other Wonders Contents
    A History Birth of the Chess Queen C Marilyn Yalom For Irv, who introduced me to chess and other wonders Contents Acknowledgments viii Introduction xii Selected Rulers of the Period xx part 1 • the mystery of the chess queen’ s birth One Chess Before the Chess Queen 3 Two Enter the Queen! 15 Three The Chess Queen Shows Her Face 29 part 2 • spain, italy, and germany Four Chess and Queenship in Christian Spain 39 Five Chess Moralities in Italy and Germany 59 part 3 • france and england Six Chess Goes to France and England 71 v • contents Seven Chess and the Cult of the Virgin Mary 95 Eight Chess and the Cult of Love 109 part 4 • scandinavia and russia Nine Nordic Queens, On and Off the Board 131 Ten Chess and Women in Old Russia 151 part 5 • power to the queen Eleven New Chess and Isabella of Castile 167 Twelve The Rise of “Queen’s Chess” 187 Thirteen The Decline of Women Players 199 Epilogue 207 Notes 211 Index 225 About the Author Praise Other Books by Marilyn Yalom Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher Waking Piece The world dreams in chess Kibitzing like lovers Pawn’s queened redemption L is a forked path only horses lead. Rook and King castling for safety Bishop boasting of crossways slide. Echo of Orbit: starless squared sky. She alone moves where she chooses. Protecting helpless monarch, her bidden skill. Attacking schemers, plotters, blundered all. Game eternal. War breaks. She enters. Check mate. Hail Queen. How we crave Her majesty. —Gary Glazner Acknowledgments This book would not have been possible without the vast philo- logical, archaeological, literary, and art historical research of pre- vious writers, most notably from Germany and England.
    [Show full text]
  • Art. I.—On the Persian Game of Chess
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY. ART. I.— On the Persian Game of Chess. By K BLAND, ESQ., M.R.A.S. [Read June 19th, 1847.] WHATEVER difference of opinion may exist as to the introduction of Chess into Europe, its Asiatic origin is undoubted, although the question of its birth-place is still open to discussion, and will be adverted to in this essay. Its more immediate design, however, is to illustrate the principles and practice of the game itself from such Oriental sources as have hitherto escaped observation, and, especially, to introduce to particular notice a variety of Chess which may, on fair grounds, be considered more ancient than that which is now generally played, and lead to a theory which, if it should be esta- blished, would materially affect our present opinions on its history. In the life of Timur by Ibn Arabshah1, that conqueror, whose love of chess forms one of numerous examples among the great men of all nations, is stated to have played, in preference, at a more complicated game, on a larger board, and with several additional pieces. The learned Dr. Hyde, in his valuable Dissertation on Eastern Games2, has limited his researches, or, rather, been restricted in them by the nature of his materials, to the modern Chess, and has no further illustrated the peculiar game of Timur than by a philological Edited by Manger, "Ahmedis ArabsiadEe Vitae et Rernm Gestarum Timuri, qui vulgo Tamerlanes dicitur, Historia. Leov. 1772, 4to;" and also by Golius, 1736, * Syntagma Dissertationum, &c. Oxon, MDCCJ-XVII., containing "De Ludis Orientalibus, Libri duo." The first part is " Mandragorias, seu Historia Shahi.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Chess
    Glossary of chess See also: Glossary of chess problems, Index of chess • X articles and Outline of chess • This page explains commonly used terms in chess in al- • Z phabetical order. Some of these have their own pages, • References like fork and pin. For a list of unorthodox chess pieces, see Fairy chess piece; for a list of terms specific to chess problems, see Glossary of chess problems; for a list of chess-related games, see Chess variants. 1 A Contents : absolute pin A pin against the king is called absolute since the pinned piece cannot legally move (as mov- ing it would expose the king to check). Cf. relative • A pin. • B active 1. Describes a piece that controls a number of • C squares, or a piece that has a number of squares available for its next move. • D 2. An “active defense” is a defense employing threat(s) • E or counterattack(s). Antonym: passive. • F • G • H • I • J • K • L • M • N • O • P Envelope used for the adjournment of a match game Efim Geller • Q vs. Bent Larsen, Copenhagen 1966 • R adjournment Suspension of a chess game with the in- • S tention to finish it later. It was once very common in high-level competition, often occurring soon af- • T ter the first time control, but the practice has been • U abandoned due to the advent of computer analysis. See sealed move. • V adjudication Decision by a strong chess player (the ad- • W judicator) on the outcome of an unfinished game. 1 2 2 B This practice is now uncommon in over-the-board are often pawn moves; since pawns cannot move events, but does happen in online chess when one backwards to return to squares they have left, their player refuses to continue after an adjournment.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Great Chess and Chinese Whispers: Misadventures of a Chess Variant
    TURKISH GREAT CHESS AND CHINESE WHISPERS: MISADVENTURES OF A CHESS VARIANT Georgi Markov National Museum of Natural History – BAS, Sofia Stefan Härtel Freie Universität Berlin A large chess variant with 52 pieces originally described in a 1800s Ottoman Turkish book as šaṭranǧ-i kabīr, or great chess, appears under various names in a number of subsequent Western sources, including authoritative works on chess history and variants. Game rules as presented in the latter are seriously flawed though, with inaccuracies regarding pieces array and moves. Over a period of more than two centuries, baseless assumptions, misreadings of previous sources and outright errors gradually accumulating in the literature have changed the game almost beyond recognition. With some of the game’s aspects not covered even by the original Turkish source, reconstructed rules are suggested and discussed, as well as a reformed variant. Introduction A chess variant with 26 pieces a side was described in a Turkish encyclopaedia, Ad-Durar al-muntahabāt al-manṯūra fī iṣlāḥ al-ġalaṭāt al-mašhūra1 by Abū'r-Rafīd Muḥammad Ḥafīd Ibn-Muṣṭafā ʿĀšir, published in AH 1221/CE 1806/72, as šaṭranǧ-i kabīr, or great chess.3 A number of later sources, including seminal works such as e.g. Murray’s History of Chess (Murray 1913), describe the game under varying names. While all 1 Written in Ottoman Turkish, the title of this work and the name of its author have been transcribed in various ways in later sources. Here, we are following the transcription conventions of the Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft. The copy of this rare book used in this paper is from the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 26: Chess Openings II #Chessathome
    Lesson 26: Chess Openings II Queen Pawn Openings In the last worksheet we looked at King Pawn Openings, beginning 1. e4. Equally popular are Queen Pawn Openings, starting with 1. d4. At Grandmaster level over 80% of all games begin with one of these two moves. 1. e4 often leads to open positions, where some pawns are exchanged in the first few moves, freeing up the board for the stronger pieces to make an early attack. 1. d4 often leads to closed positions, where the pawns in the centre are blocked and the play becomes more strategic. Attacks may build up slowly, and happen later in the game, but are no less effective! Which is best? Chess players have been arguing about this for years. Most have favourite first moves. Which is yours? The Indian Defences One popular response to 1. d4 is for Black to play 1...Nf6. Black allows their opponent to occupy the centre, hoping that White will overstretch them- selves. It’s a counter-attacking strategy, discovered by a group of players known as the Hypermodernists, 100 years ago. At the time, Indian chess had different rules: the pawn could only ever move one square at a time and the king could make a single move like a knight. The positions reached in Indian chess looked like these Hypermod- ern Openings. The Indian Defences were born. Nimzo Indian King’s Indian Queen’s Indian #ChessatHome www.chessinschools.co.uk The Queen’s Gambit If the game begins 1. d4 d5, the most popu- lar choice for White is to play the Queen’s Gambit with 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Learn to Play Chess
    LEARN TO PLAY CHESS Terry Marris December 2004 CONTENTS 1 Kings and Queens 2 The Rooks 3 The Bishops 4 The Pawns 5 The Knights 6 How to Play 1 INTRODUCTION Chess is a game of war. You have pieces that include a King, a Queen, and Knights on horses. Each piece moves in its own special way. You capture your enemy's pieces to weaken his or her defences. Your aim is to attack your enemy's King so that it cannot escape. Chess started in India in the fifth century and it is now played all over the world. There are club, county, country and world competitions to find champion chess players. An ability to play chess is highly rated by university admissions tutors because successful chess players can concentrate, think logically and solve problems. THE BOARD The two players face each other on opposite sides of the board. Rule The square on your right must be white. white on your right white on your right 2 THE QUEEN The Queen is the second tallest piece in your chess set. We use a pointed crown to represent a Queen. Rule The Queen starts on the centre of the back row on her own colour. Black Queen starts on the black square. White Queen starts on the white square. The two Queens start by facing each other. We always show white playing up the board. 3 Rule The Queen may move any number of squares in a straight line - provided there is no other piece blocking her way. A Queen, like nearly all other pieces, cannot jump.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Final Version of the New Laws of Chess. Thus Previously
    This is the final version of the new Laws of Chess. Thus previously highlighting in yellow has been removed as it was principally there to help people who were translating the Laws. Grey shows where the Laws have been tidied up more recently due to input by various people. FIDE LAWS OF CHESS TAKING EFFECT FROM 1 JULY 2014 Contents: INTRODUCTION page 2 PREFACE page 2 BASIC RULES OF PLAY page 2 Article 1: The nature and objectives of the game of chess page 2 Article 2: The initial position of the pieces on the chessboard page 3 Article 3: The moves of the pieces page 4 Article 4: The act of moving the pieces page 7 Article 5: The completion of the game page 8 COMPETITION RULES page 9 Article 6: The chessclock page 9 Article 7: Irregularities page 11 Article 8: The recording of the moves page 12 Article 9: The drawn game page 13 Article 10: Points page 14 Article 11: The conduct of the players page 14 Article 12: The role of the arbiter (see Preface) page 15 Appendices: A. Rapidplay page 17 B. Blitz page 18 C. Algebraic notation page 19 1 D. Rules for play with blind and visually disabled players page 21 E. Adjourned games page 23 F. Chess960 rules page 25 G. Quickplay Finishes page 27 Glossary of terms in the Laws of Chess page 28 INTRODUCTION FIDE Laws of Chess cover over-the-board play. The Laws of Chess have two parts: 1. Basic Rules of Play and 2. Competition Rules.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classified Encyclopedia of Chess Variants
    THE CLASSIFIED ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHESS VARIANTS I once read a story about the discovery of a strange tribe somewhere in the Amazon basin. An eminent anthropologist recalls that there was some evidence that a space ship from Mars had landed in the area a millenium or two earlier. ‘Good heavens,’ exclaims the narrator, are you suggesting that this tribe are the descendants of Martians?’ ‘Certainly not,’ snaps the learned man, ‘they are the original Earth-people — it is we who are the Martians.’ Reflect that chess is but an imperfect variant of a game that was itself a variant of a germinal game whose origins lie somewhere in the darkness of time. The Classified Encyclopedia of Chess Variants D. B. Pritchard The second edition of The Encyclopedia of Chess Variants completed and edited by John Beasley Copyright © the estate of David Pritchard 2007 Published by John Beasley 7 St James Road Harpenden Herts AL5 4NX GB - England ISBN 978-0-9555168-0-1 Typeset by John Beasley Originally printed in Great Britain by Biddles Ltd, King’s Lynn Contents Introduction to the second edition 13 Author’s acknowledgements 16 Editor’s acknowledgements 17 Warning regarding proprietary games 18 Part 1 Games using an ordinary board and men 19 1 Two or more moves at a time 21 1.1 Two moves at a turn, intermediate check observed 21 1.2 Two moves at a turn, intermediate check ignored 24 1.3 Two moves against one 25 1.4 Three to ten moves at a turn 26 1.5 One more move each time 28 1.6 Every man can move 32 1.7 Other kinds of multiple movement 32 2 Games with concealed
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 29, India and the Rest of Asia
    Chapter 29 India and the rest of Asia [This final chapter on regional and historical variants considers Asian games outside the xiangqi and shogi traditions. Be it noted that while most of these four chapters merely summarize material that is available elsewhere, with Burmese Chess and to some extent with Indian Chess David believed he was tapping sources which had not hitherto contributed to Western chess literature.] 29.1 Indian chess on the 8x8 board Indian Chess. ‘There is no Indian game of game as near as the surrounding circle of chess. Rather there are three, and the two most natives permitted, and I followed well the played have varying rules. Some play moves with the help of a small opera-glass’. European chess .... some the ancient four- Native writers have been the principal source handed game and a few Great Chess.’ Thus of information. Often quoted are Lala Raja W. S. Branch (Chess Amateur, July 1917). Babu and Trevangadacharya Shastree, ‘the Murray, too, recognizes three main games Brahmin’, who was said never to have lost a which he calls Hindustani, Parsi (S. India) and game at chess, except one, in which he Rumi (N.W. India). Modern historians are less allowed himself to be beaten by a lady. (The dogmatic. A. Goswami observes that ‘The Brahmin had not miscalculated - the lost game indigenous chess is played in this country in a secured him a bullock contract.) variety of ways and styles...’ (Bulletin of the Summarized are the features in common of Correspondence Chess Association of India, the mainstream games.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction I am an enthusiast of historical chess variants; I was very delighted to hear about the chessvariants , history.chess.free.fr , Wikipedia articles , Chinese Chess History , zillionsofgames as well as various other interesting sites that explained ancient variants & rules of playing them. My interest began in learning how to play these games; then I wanted a clear comparable set of rules on how to play them. This inspired me to start this small exercise of writing the rules of major historical chess variants that was played on familiar board sizes (i.e. 8x8 or slightly larger). I started writing the rules of Chaturanga, the assumed ancestor of all chess variants, & then wrote about the various other descendants. I resorted heavily on the above mentioned sites as well as other information that I’ve searched on the Internet. I tried to the best of my efforts to capture all the rules that are mentioned & crossed checked them with all the available information that I was able to gather. The result was this document, which I later tried to give it more flavor by adding some historical details as well as some insightful speculations, which I inferred from reading various authorities on the subject. Again all the information I’ve gathered were Internet based information. At the end, I also decided to add an Appendix to explain the ancient Indian spiral race board game called Ashtapada , which historians believe that its board was used to develop Chaturanga . I’ve reconstructed the rules from a similar old Indian race game called Ashta-Kashte .
    [Show full text]