DOCSLIB.ORG

BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL KEY DECISION to BE TAKEN Ref No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL KEY DECISION to BE TAKEN Ref No BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL KEY DECISION TO BE TAKEN Ref No: CD 03.13-14 Title: ELENA programme (total value £140m) Wards affected: All Summary of decision to Multiple decisions pertaining to the various delivery strands within the ELENA be taken: programme have been through various Cabinets (October 2013, January 2014, July 2014 and October 2014) and scheduled for Cabinets in February 2015 and July 2015. The programme is now delivering and a final completion report is expected to come back to Cabinet in December 2016, after the programme close in June 2016 and the subsequent completion /outcome report being written over summer 2016. Reason why key 1. the decision is likely to result in expenditure or savings of over £500,000; decision: 2. the decision is likely to be significant in terms of its effect on communities. Corporate priorities: Priorities are: to cut carbon dioxide emissions to meet our targets; to cut costs and levels of energy; to reduce energy costs on a city-wide scale; to improve comfort and energy security; to cut fuel poverty among tenants and homeowners; the creation 1000 jobs; to maximise job creation and investment in Bristol and the wider sub-region/region; the programme is self-financing, profit if possible that can be reinvested; to engage the local supply chain and improve the local economy. Financial position : Included in the capital programme Scrutiny Input : Place Scrutiny Commission Decision taker: Mayor Service department Place Executive member Mayor Item cleared with Signed by executive member originally on 23 July 2012 executive member on : Anticipated date of A series of reports have been / will be scheduled for Cabinet. decision: Principal consultees: Stakeholder engagement plan developed Means of consultation: Please see stakeholder engagement plan Consultation period: TBC When & how to make To Bill Edrich, Service Director – Energy / Mareike Schmidt representations: Documents which will Cabinet reports for each strand of the programme delivery, commercial model etc. be used to inform the Details tbc once project plans worked out, depends on policy developments as well decision and the date of such as the Energy Bill availability: 1 Contact name: Mareike Schmidt Address: Telephone: 0117-92-22640 Fax: Email: [email protected] 2 BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL KEY DECISION TO BE TAKEN Ref No: NCD 07.13-14 Title: Community Transport Commissioning – Part 2 Wards affected: All Summary of decision to Part 1: To agree the level and means of interim funding from April 2014 to the be taken: commencement of the new services to prevent a gap in service. Part 2: Discussions are continuing with the Community Transport sector over the introduction of the strategy for CT service provision that was previously consulted on. Consideration is being given to broadening the scope of the strategy and early work is progressing on this. If, as is anticipated, the strategy is to be introduced from April 2016 then a Cabinet decision will be required later in 2015. Reason why key The decision is likely to result in expenditure over £500,000 and decision: is likely to be significant in terms of its effect on communities. Corporate priorities: Reduce Health and wealth inequalities through promoting independence, dignity and quality of life for people living with disability and long-term illness. To help people be more active and live longer in their homes. A City of strong and safe communities through strengthening volunteering and the voluntary and community sector. To promote equalities and reduce the gap created by historic inequality. Financial position: Provision dependent on the future revenue budget agreement Scrutiny Input: Strategic Development and Transport Scrutiny commission (14th March 2013 and 20th June 2013). Health, Wellbeing and Adult Care Scrutiny commission (represented at 20th June SD&T) Place scrutiny commission Decision taker: Mayor (decision to be taken at a Cabinet meeting) Service department Place Executive member Assistant Mayor - Place Item cleared with executive member on: Signed by Cllr Mark Bradshaw on 22 August 2013 Anticipated date of Part 2 – Pending decision: Principal consultees: Local ward members, neighbourhood partnerships, existing providers and their service users, potential service providers and other community stakeholders. 1 Means of consultation: Consultation feedback questionnaire on the draft commissioning strategy and all associated documents remain accessible online at www.bristol.gov.uk/communitytransport. Questionnaires and copies of the draft strategy and background documents were also made available through existing community transport service providers, BCC customer service points, libraries, GP surgeries, neighbourhood partnership coordinators and the passenger transport team during the consultation period. Consultation period: Part 1 - 20th February to 15th May 2013 (12 weeks) When & how to make Completion of feedback questionnaires during the consultation period. representations: or write by e-mail to the contacts below. Documents which will The report to Cabinet will be available 5 working days before the anticipated be used to inform the date of decision. decision and the date of availability: Contact name: Pete Woodhouse. Group Manager David Prosser. Project Manager (Services) Address: Passenger Transport Team, Brunel Transport Projects Team, Brunel House House. Telephone: 0117 903 6176 Email: [email protected] (via Passenger Transport) 2 BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL KEY DECISION TO BE TAKEN Ref No: PLE 11.14-15 Title: Capital funding – extra care housing (ECH) phase 3 Wards affected: All Summary of decision to To commit to capital funding and land discounts to implement phase 3 of ECH be taken: which will deliver 120 social rent and shared ownership units as part of the overall ECH strategy agreed in 2012. Reason why key Expenditure over £500,000 decision: Corporate priorities: ECH falls under 2 priorities: Keeping Bristol healthier and Building successful places Financial position : Capital funding is currently in tier 2 of the capital programme. Discounted land can be seen as forgone sales. The revenue budget is already in place in the care management budget. The business case clearly states that this is an invest to save initiative and the Council is in effect buying a service which costs 30% less than placing people in residential care homes. Scrutiny Input : People scrutiny commission Decision taker: Mayor – at Health and Wellbeing Board Service department Care Services , People Directorate Executive member Assistant Mayor Brenda Massey Item cleared with Signed by Cllr Massey on 17 February 2015 Mayor / Executive Member on : Anticipated date of 17 June 2015 decision: Principal consultees: Bristol CCG, Bristol Community Health, ECH partnership board Means of consultation: N/A – this is the final phase of an already agreed long term strategy Consultation period: N/A When & how to make To officer named below representations: Documents which will Report to be published 5 clear working days before the meeting. be used to inform the decision and the date of availability: Contact name: Tim Wye Address: Telephone: [email protected] Email: BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL KEY DECISION TO BE TAKEN Ref No: PLE 08.14-15 Title: Improving Lives - Improving Places, an Integrated Education and Capital Strategy Wards affected: All Summary of decision to To approve the new ‘Integrated Education and Capital Strategy’ for consultation. be taken: Reason why key 1. the decision is to result in expenditure over £500,000; decision: 2. the decision is significant in terms of its effect on communities. Corporate priorities: Building Successful Places; Global Green Capital; Keeping Bristol Working & Learning; Keep Bristol Moving Financial position : To be included in the Education Capital Programme 2016-2021, pending approval from Cabinet Scrutiny Input : Being considered by People Scrutiny on 9th March 2015 Decision taker: Mayor (decision to be taken at a Cabinet meeting) Service department People Executive member Cllr Brenda Massey Item cleared with Signed by Councillor Massey on 8 December 2014 Mayor / executive member on : Anticipated date of 1 September 2015 decision: Principal consultees: Head Teachers/ Schools; Parents/carers; Public Consultation Means of consultation: Education Satellite Group Consultation; Head Teachers/School Consultation; Education Capital Group; Neighbourhood Partnerships; Councillors; Youth Council; parents/carers; Mayor/Cabinet; Public Consultation Consultation period: Public Consultation: 90 days – Wednesday 4th March – Tuesday 7th July When & how to make Through the Website, in writing or by email to the contact below before the 7th representations: July 2015 Documents which will Report and Draft Strategy be used to inform the decision and the date of availability: Contact name: Bob Rutherford & Ian Bell Address: Education Capital Team, 1st Floor Brunel House, St. George’s Street, Bristol, BS1 5UY Telephone: 0117 90 37596 Fax: 0117 9037775 Email: [email protected] [email protected] BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL KEY DECISION TO BE TAKEN Ref No: PLE 07.14-15 Title: Re-commissioning of care home services in Bristol Wards affected: Citywide Summary of decision to To seek approval to: be taken: - change the way that BCC commissions care home services and undertake a tender process to select the providers that BCC will commission these services from. - delegate authority to the Strategic Director - People to award contracts to the providers
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Managing Challenging Behaviour in Meetings
    Managing Challenging Behaviour in Meetings A joint authority training course designed for all councillors and council officers who experience challenging and disruptive behaviour from members of the public and colleagues, which could lead to conflict or breach of the Code of conduct in situations such as: • Council and Town and Parish Meetings • Neighbourhood Partnerships • Committees, Sub-committees & Panels • Area Boards • Public meetings & Forums • Scrutiny Meetings Course Dates (all courses will run from 9.30am to 4.45pm) 21 st September in South Gloucestershire at Council Offices, Poole Court, Yate BS37 5PT 8th October in Wiltshire at Committee Room 2, Browfort, Devizes. 12 th October in Bristol at Bristol City Council House BS1 5TR For further information on the facilitators please see web site: www.cmstraining.net Booking details [email protected] Councillor Development Officer 07789205920 South Gloucestershire Council 01454 863084 [email protected] Councillor Development Officer 0117 9222097 Bristol City Council [email protected] Democratic Services Officer 01225 713597 Wiltshire Council Course Contents Recognising & Assessing Risk: Key strategies for assessing where conflict and disruption could escalate, particularly when discussing emotive or difficult situations. Looking at assessing risk in rapidly changing situations and making appropriate choices. Understanding Aggression: Understanding of the causes of aggressive and challenging behaviour & identify early physical and emotional stages. Defusing & Resolving Conflict: Identifying what works and does not work when communicating in volatile situations and the six key elements of defusing conflict and dealing with disruption. This incorporates a simple four stage resolution model. Law Relating to Conflict: The legal and Code of Conduct context relating to conflict situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • Avon Gorge and Downs Wildlife Project Update (Mandy Leivers)
    Agenda item: Avon Gorge and Downs Wildlife Project Annual Report 2019 Officers Presenting Report: Becky Belfin Nature Conservation Officer and Mandy Leivers, Avon Gorge and Downs Biodiversity Education Manager Context The Avon Gorge and Downs Wildlife Project was launched on 23rd October 1999. It is a partnership of Bristol City Council, the Downs Committee, Merchant Venturers, Bristol Zoo Gardens, Natural England, the University of Bristol, and Bristol Zoological Society. We also work with the National Trust, Forestry Commission and other landowners on the North Somerset side of the Gorge, as well as the Friends of the Downs and Avon Gorge. The aim of the project is 'to secure the future of the outstanding wildlife interest of the Avon Gorge, Clifton Down, Durdham Down and Leigh Woods, as well as raising awareness and understanding of this unique location and its importance for people and wildlife’. Annual Review This report provides a review of progress and key achievements of the Avon Gorge & Downs Wildlife Project between January and December 2019. Habitat Management Works Throughout the Avon Gorge and Downs The winter conservation works on the Bristol side of the Gorge continue to focus on the removal of scrub and invasive species, in order to protect the rocky limestone outcrops, and restore them back to species-rich grassland. This work is primarily carried out by specialist rope access contractors, due to the tricky terrain. In the Gully, the goats are still controlling the regrowth of scrubby species, but the reduction in numbers of the goats over the last few years now needs to be addressed to ensure this good work continues.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Growth, Environment and Resources Scrutiny Committee, 08/01/2020 19:00
    Public Document Pack AB GROWTH, ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES SCRUTINY COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY 8 JANUARY 2020 7.00 PM Bourges/Viersen Room - Town Hall AGENDA Page No 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Declarations of Interest and Whipping Declarations At this point Members must declare whether they have a disclosable pecuniary interest, or other interest, in any of the items on the agenda, unless it is already entered in the register of members’ interests or is a “pending notification “ that has been disclosed to the Solicitor to the Council. Members must also declare if they are subject to their party group whip in relation to any items under consideration. 3. Minutes of Meetings held on: 3.1 6 November 2019 - Growth, Environment and Resources 3 - 12 Scrutiny Committee 3.2 18 December 2019 - Joint Scrutiny of the Budget 13 - 34 4. Call In of any Cabinet, Cabinet Member or Key Officer Decision The decision notice for each decision will bear the date on which it is published and will specify that the decision may then be implemented on the expiry of 3 working days after the publication of the decision (not including the date of publication), unless a request for call-in of the decision is received from any two Members of the relevant Scrutiny Committee. If a request for call-in of a decision is received, implementation of the decision remains suspended for consideration by the relevant Scrutiny Committee. There is an induction hearing loop system available in all meeting rooms. Some of the systems are infra-red operated, if you wish to use this system then please contact David Beauchamp on 01733 384628 or [email protected] as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester's Green Infrastructure Strategy
    LEICESTER GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY 2015-2025 EVIDENCE BASE, ACTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES 1 | P a g e FOREWORD This framework sets out the strategic vision for our green sites in Leicester and the ways in which they can be created, managed and maintained to provide maximum benefits to the people who live, work or visit Leicester. The actions are supported by an evidence base of data and information which recognise and prioritise key areas where resources can be focussed to develop high quality green infrastructure (GI) into our new and existing communities. By placing the framework within the planning system it is possible to provide the key tools needed to secure these areas and design them to provide multi- functional green space. Improvements to established green space and creating new sites to surround built development will provide an accessible and natural green network. These areas will be capable of supporting a range of functions which include landscaping/public amenity, recreation, flood control, safer access routes, cooler areas to combat predicted climate change and places for wildlife. These functions give rise to a range of environmental and quality of life benefits which include providing attractive and distinctive places to live, work and play; improving public health, facilitating access and encouraging sustainable transport as well as offering an environment to support wildlife. Placing a monetary value on these benefits is difficult, but many have potential to deliver significant economic value by increasing the attractiveness of a neighbourhood for businesses and employers, encouraging tourism and associated revenue, reducing health care costs and maintenance or clean-up costs from flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Gosh Locations
    GOSH LOCATIONS - MAY POSTAL COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE SECTOR NAME MONTH (DATES) SECTOR BH12 1 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Branksome) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH12 2 Poole Borough Council Albert Road, Poole 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH12 3 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Parkstone, Newtown) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH12 4 Poole Borough Council Rossmore, Alderney, Bournemouth 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH12 5 Poole Borough Council Wallisdown, Talbot Heath, Bournemouth 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH13 6 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Branksome Park) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH13 7 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Branksome Park, Canford Cliffs) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH14 0 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Parkstone) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH14 8 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Parkstone, Lilliput) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH14 9 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Parkstone (West)) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH15 1 Poole Borough Council Lagland Street, Poole 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH15 2 Poole Borough Council Longfleet, Poole 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH15 3 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Oakdale) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH15 4 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Hamworthy) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH17 0 Poole Borough Council Nuffield Ind Est 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH17 7 Poole Borough Council Poole (Incl Waterloo, Upton) 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH17 8 Poole Borough Council Canfold Heath, Poole 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH17 9 Poole Borough Council Canford Heath, Darby's Corner, Poole 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH18 8 Poole Borough Council Hillbourne, Poole 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH18 9 Poole Borough Council Broadstone, Poole 29.04.19-02.06.19 BH16 5 Purbeck
    [Show full text]
  • URBAN LIVING SPD Making Successful Places at Higher Densities
    Adopted November 2018 URBAN LIVING SPD Making successful places at higher densities Growth and Regeneration Foreword We are committed to make the most of the development land available in the city to support the significant increase in new-and-affordable homes and infrastructure we desperately need. In the last 20 years, there has been a dramatic shift with people returning to live in or close to the city centre. This urban renaissance has led to apartment living being commonplace in Bristol. The more successful schemes combine homes with cafes, shops, community uses and workplaces to create vibrant spaces with a high quality public realm. With this renewed appetite amongst developers to build at higher densities, including tall buildings, it is important that we strengthen our planning guidance to ensure that we learn from successful places and don’t repeat any mistakes from the past. We want to ensure that future development of the city is inclusive by design, where neighbourhoods are not Credits isolated but interconnected so that varied social, economic and cultural opportunities are This document has been prepared by the City Design Group at Bristol accessible to all. Whilst tall buildings are one way of potentially optimising densities, they City Council. aren’t the only way, and aren’t appropriate in all circumstances. I’d like to thank the citizens, business professionals, community representatives, planning Conceptual and Graphic Design © agents, and architects who have helped shape this Urban Living Supplementary Planning City Design Group Document (SPD). The document has sought to reconcile the sometimes polarised views Illustrations © City Design Group Mapping © Crown copyright and expressed through consultation, providing positive guidance on how to optimise densities database right 2012 OS Survey in the City.
    [Show full text]
  • UASC Capacity Support - Proposed Distribution of £21.3M Allocation Is Based on Latest Available Home Office Management Data Capturing Numbers at September
    UASC capacity support - proposed distribution of £21.3m Allocation is based on latest available Home Office management data capturing numbers at September. The information on NTS transfers has been confirmed by the Strategic Migration Partnership leads and is accurate up to December 2017. Please see attached FAQ and methodology document for further information. Local Authority Amount Total 21,258,203.00 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham £ 141,094.00 London Borough of Barnet £ 282,189.00 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bath and North East Somerset Council £ 94,063.00 Bedford Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Bexley £ 282,189.00 Birmingham City Council £ 188,126.00 Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bournemouth Borough Council £ 141,094.00 Bracknell Forest Council £ 94,063.00 Bradford Metropolitan District Council £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Brent £ 329,219.00 Brighton and Hove City Council £ 188,126.00 Bristol City Council £ 188,126.00 London Borough of Bromley £ 141,094.00 Buckinghamshire County Council £ 188,126.00 Bury Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £ 235,157.00 London Borough of Camden £ 329,219.00 Central Bedfordshire Council £ 282,189.00 Cheshire East Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Cheshire West and Chester Council £ 94,063.00 City of London £ 94,063.00 City of Nottingham Council £ 94,063.00 Cornwall Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Coventry City
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Note: Assessing the Health Impacts of Development
    PRACTICE NOTE PLANNING A HEALTHIER BRISTOL Assessing the health impacts of development February 2013 - 1 - PLANNING A HEALTHIER BRISTOL Assessing the health impacts of development PLANNING A HEALTHIER BRISTOL Assessing the health impacts of development CONTENTS page 1 Introduction 3 2 Policy Context 4 3 Submission Requirements 6 4 The benefits of a health impact assessment 7 5 What is health impact assessment 8 6 Screening 9 7 Scoping 10 8 Types of health impact assessment 13 9 The impact on health services 14 10 Assessing the quality of a health impact assessment 15 11 The planning decision 16 Glossary 17 APPENDICES 1 Useful websites 19 2 Useful reports 21 3 HIA review package 24 - 2 - PLANNING A HEALTHIER BRISTOL Assessing the health impacts of development 1. INTRODUCTION The environment is a major determinant of the health and wellbeing of the population1 and the planning system has a major influence on the environment. As the “Joint Strategic Needs Assessment of Health and Wellbeing in Bristol” (2012 strategic summary, page 8) states: “…a healthier city will not come just from individual actions, but needs an integrated approach to planning the built environment to create a supportive environment and infrastructure for a Healthy City. This needs to focus on areas with poor health outcomes and inequalities (eg Inner City or South Bristol) and to take account of the health impact of living in the city in the future, eg: improving access to green spaces and to shops selling healthy food, as well as incorporating sustainability issues for a healthier future.” Bristol Local Plan policy DM14 aims to ensure that the impact on health and wellbeing, including health inequalities is considered from the outset in the determination of planning applications and requires systematic health impact assessments (HIA) to be undertaken for larger proposals (those that are defined as ‘super’ major developments under the Bristol Planning Protocol).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Councils in England by Type
    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 343 councils in England: • Metropolitan districts (36) • London boroughs (32) plus the City of London • Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly • County councils (26) • District councils (192) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croyd on 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Zero Waste Bristol: Waste and Resource Management Strategy April 2016
    Bristol City Council Towards a Zero Waste Bristol: Waste and Resource Management Strategy April 2016 1 Table of Contents Page Why Update the Strategy? 3 Towards a Zero Waste Bristol – Vision and Objectives 5 Where are we now? 9 Local Context 22 Legislative and Policy Drivers 25 Towards a Zero Waste Bristol – Everyone’s Responsibility 33 What will Success Look Like? 35 Glossary of Terms 37 List of Figures and Tables Figure 1: The Waste Hierarchy 5 Figure 2: Recycling and Composting Performance (%) - 2004/05 to 2014/15 11 Figure 3: Kilograms of Residual Waste Per Person Per Year 2004/05 to 2014/15 12 Figure 4: Annual landfill/Recycling and Composting Rates (%) - 2004/05 to 2014/15 12 Figure 5: Schematic of Avonmouth Energy Facility 13 Figure 6: HRC Recycling and Composting Performance (tonnages) - 2004/05 to 14 2014/15 Figure 7: Composition of Bristol Residual Waste (%) - 2014 15 Figure 8: Bristol Waste Contracts 17 Figure 9: English Core Cities Comparison Recycling Rates (%) 2009 - early 2014 19 Figure 10: English Core Cites Comparison (where data available) on Municipal Waste 19 Sent to Landfill (%) 2009 - early 2014 Figure 11: Percentage of QOL respondents who say that street litter is a problem 20 Figure 12: Percentage of QOL respondents who feel that dog fouling is a problem in 20 their local area Figure 13: Percentage of QOL respondents who say graffiti is a problem 21 Figure 14: Department for Communities and Local Government: Bristol Household 23 Projections 2012 Table 1: Relevant Legislation for Waste, Streetscene and Resource Management 27 Table 2: West of England Key Targets and Objectives 29 Table 3: Strategic Outcomes 34 Table 4: Performance Indicators 35 2 Why Update the Strategy? Since Bristol City Council’s previous Waste and Streetscene Strategy was written in 2009, there have been a number of changes to the legislative, policy and local context affecting waste and streetscene services which need to be reflected in an updated strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracting Authority Type Correct As of October 2017
    Contracting Authority Type Correct as of October 2017 Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust Charity Allerdale Borough Council Local Government Arch Commercial Enterprise Service provider Association of Police & Crime Commissioners Blue Light Avon & Somerset Constabulary Blue Light Aylesbury Vale District Council Local Government Basildon Borough Council Local Government Bath & North East Somerset Council Local Government Birmingham City Council Local Government Blackburn with Darwen Council Local Government Blackpool Council Local Government Bolton Council Local Government Boston Borough Council Local Government Bristol City Council Local Government Brunel University London University Buckinghamshire New University University Bury Council Local Government Cambridgeshire County Council Local Government Cardiff Council Local Government Carlisle City Council Local Government Carmarthenshire County Council Local Government Central Bedfordshire Council Local Government Chapter Homes Housing Association Cheltenham Borough Council Local Government Cherwell District Council & South Northamptonshire Local Government Council Cheshire East Council Local Government Chiltern District Council Local Government City of Lincoln Council Local Government City of London Corporation Local Government City of York Council Local Government Cleveland Fire Authority Blue Light Cornwall Council Local Government County Durham Housing Group Housing Association Coventry City Council Local Government Cranfield University University Cumbria County Council Local
    [Show full text]