The Seven Years War Free

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Seven Years War Free FREE THE SEVEN YEARS WAR PDF Daniel Marston | 96 pages | 25 Jul 2001 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781841761916 | English | Oxford, England, United Kingdom The Seven Years War () - Strategy Game In the terms of the treaty, France gave up all its territories in mainland North America, The Seven Years War ending any foreign military threat to the British colonies there. Inprior to The Seven Years War outbreak of hostilities, Great Britain controlled the 13 colonies up to the Appalachian Mountains, but beyond lay New France, a very large, sparsely settled colony that stretched The Seven Years War Louisiana through the Mississippi Valley and Great Lakes to Canada. The border between French and British possessions was not well defined, and one disputed territory was the upper Ohio River valley. The French had constructed a number of forts in this region in an attempt to The Seven Years War their claim on the territory. British colonial forces, led by Lieutenant Colonel George Washington, attempted to expel the French inbut were outnumbered and defeated The Seven Years War the French. However, his adversaries in the Cabinet outmaneuvered him by making the plans public, thus alerting the French Government and escalating a distant frontier skirmish into a full-scale war. The war did not begin well for the British. The British Government sent General Edward Braddock to the colonies as commander in chief of British North American forces, but he alienated potential Indian allies and colonial leaders failed to cooperate with him. On July 13,Braddock died after being mortally wounded in an ambush on a failed expedition to capture Fort Duquesne in present-day Pittsburgh. The war in North America settled into a stalemate for the next several years, while in Europe the French scored an important naval victory and captured the British possession of Minorca in the Mediterranean in However, after the war began to turn in favor of Great Britain. British forces defeated French forces in India, and in British The Seven Years War invaded and conquered Canada. Facing defeat in North America and a tenuous position in Europe, the French Government attempted to engage the British in peace negotiations, but British Minister William Pitt the elderSecretary for Southern Affairs, sought not only the French cession of Canada but also commercial concessions that the French Government found unacceptable. The terms of the agreement stated that Spain would declare war on Great Britain if the war did not end before May 1, Despite facing such a formidable alliance, The Seven Years War naval strength and Spanish ineffectiveness led to British success. Fighting in Europe ended after a failed Spanish invasion of British ally Portugal. ByFrench and Spanish diplomats began to seek peace. Spanish King Charles III refused to agree to a treaty that would require Spain to cede Cuba, but the British Parliament would never ratify a treaty that did not reflect British territorial gains made during the war. Facing this dilemma, French negotiator Choiseul proposed a solution that redistributed American territory between France, Spain and Great Britain. French territories west The Seven Years War the Mississippi would become Spanish, along with the port of New Orleans. In return for these areas, along with the territory in India, Africa, and the Mediterranean island of Minorca, France would regain the Caribbean islands that British forces had captured during the war. The British Government also promised to The Seven Years War French Canadians to freely practice Catholicism and provided for French fishing rights off Newfoundland. Choiseul preferred to keep the small Caribbean islands of Martinique, Guadeloupe, and The Seven Years War. Lucia rather than hold on to the vast territory stretching from Louisiana to Canada. In contrast, Canada had been a drain on the French treasury. The loss of Canada, while lamentable to French officials, made sense from a mercantile perspective. The diplomats completed their negotiations and signed the preliminary Treaty of Paris on November 3, Spanish and French negotiators also signed the Treaty of San Ildefonso at the same time, which confirmed the cession of French Louisiana to Spain. However, the treaty contained enough concessions to war hawks that the British Parliament ratified the Treaty of Paris by a majority of to 64, and the treaty went The Seven Years War effect on February 10, For Anglo-American colonists, the treaty was a theoretical success. By confirming the conquest of Canada and extending British possessions to the Mississippi, the colonists no longer had to worry about the threat of a French invasion. For the American Indians in what had been frontier territory, the treaty proved disastrous. They could no longer pursue what had been a largely effective strategy of playing the French and British against each other to extract the most favorable terms The Seven Years War alliance and preserve their lands against encroachment by Anglo-American colonists. Despite what seemed like a success, the Treaty of Paris ultimately encouraged dissension between Anglo-American colonists and the British Government because their interests in North America no longer coincided. Coupled with differences between the imperial government and colonists on how to levy taxes to pay for debts on wartime expenses, the Treaty of Paris ultimately set the colonists on the path towards seeking independence, even as it seemed to make the British Empire stronger than ever. How did the United States react to the French Revolution? What caused the French and Indian War? Why did the Continental Congress draft and sign the Declaration of Independence? How did the Treaty of Paris of end the American Revolution? This page was last edited on 13 Septemberat Privacy policy About DailyHistory. Why Was the Year the War Came Home | The term is used to describe the fighting between Sweden and Prussia between and in Swedish PomeraniaPrussian Pomeranianorthern Brandenburg and eastern Mecklenburg-Schwerin. The war was characterized by a back-and-forth movement of the Swedish and Prussian armies, neither of whom would score a decisive victory. It started when Swedish forces advanced into Prussian territory inbut were repelled and blockaded at Stralsund until their relief by a Russian force in In the course of the following, renewed Swedish incursion into Prussian territory, the small Prussian fleet was destroyed and areas as far south as Neuruppin were occupied, yet the campaign was aborted in late when the undersupplied Swedish forces succeeded neither in taking the major Prussian fortress of Stettin now Szczecin nor in combining with their Russian allies. A Prussian counter-attack of Swedish Pomerania in January was repelled, and throughout the year Swedish forces The Seven Years War advanced into Prussian territory as far south as Prenzlau before again withdrawing to Swedish Pomerania in the winter. Another Swedish campaign into Prussia started in the summer ofbut was soon aborted due to shortage of supplies and equipment. When on 5 May a Russo-Prussian alliance eliminated Swedish The Seven Years War for future The Seven Years War assistance, and instead posed the threat of a Russian intervention on the Prussian side, Sweden was forced to make peace. The The Seven Years War of the Swedish Hats party to recover territories lost to Prussia in were thwarted, and the unpopular and costly war contributed to their subsequent downfall. The main cause for the Swedish intervention in the Seven Years' War was that the Hats faction then in power in Sweden believed Frederick II of Prussia would succumb to his many enemies, thus affording Sweden a risk-free opportunity to recapture its possessions in Pomerania that it had ceded to Prussia intowards the end of the Great Northern War. Angered and frightened by the attempted monarchial revolution ofthe Hats also wanted to cause Frederick's downfall and to humiliate and destroy the Swedish queen Louisa Ulrika of PrussiaFrederick's sister. The Hats faction was also encouraged to declare war The Seven Years War France, whose wishes were central to the Hats' actions. Frederick's invasion of Saxony in was used as a pretext The Seven Years War war, being denounced by both Sweden and France as a violation of the Treaty of Westphalia ofof which they were both guarantors. The Seven Years War March 21, the governments of France and Austria agreed a convention in which Sweden and France explained that they had to maintain Germany's freedom in line with the treaty. France promised financial backing for such a war and in June the same year the decision was made to send 20, Swedish troops to Germany to emphasise their commitment. On September 13 that force invaded Prussian Pomerania. To avoid this invasion appearing as a war of aggression no war of aggression could be started without the consent of the estatesthe Swedes issued no declaration of war and presented the incursion to the German parliament as aimed solely at restoring peace. Only after hostilities had begun did the promised financial support from France and its allies arrive and only then, on 22 Septemberdid the Swedish government state The Seven Years War conditions and declare war. However, the Hats had seriously overestimated the strength of the Swedish army, as the soldiers where badly trained, poorly equipped, and in every way unprepared for war. The Swedish army sent to Germany was only sufficient for taking possession of what The Seven Years War already been conquered by the Allies, but made the all necessary preparations to go on the offensive despite not having the necessary funds. Von Ungern-Sternberg relinquished command on 21 December to Gustaf von Rosen, but von Rosen too was forced to lie idle, blockaded by the Prussians. This blockade was lifted by an invading Russian army on 18 Junebut von Rosen had grown tired of his thankless The Seven Years War and handed command over to Gustav David Hamilton.
Recommended publications
  • Stony Brook University
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Invasions, Insurgency and Interventions: Sweden’s Wars in Poland, Prussia and Denmark 1654 - 1658. A Dissertation Presented by Christopher Adam Gennari to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University May 2010 Copyright by Christopher Adam Gennari 2010 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Christopher Adam Gennari We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Ian Roxborough – Dissertation Advisor, Professor, Department of Sociology. Michael Barnhart - Chairperson of Defense, Distinguished Teaching Professor, Department of History. Gary Marker, Professor, Department of History. Alix Cooper, Associate Professor, Department of History. Daniel Levy, Department of Sociology, SUNY Stony Brook. This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School """"""""" """"""""""Lawrence Martin "" """""""Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Invasions, Insurgency and Intervention: Sweden’s Wars in Poland, Prussia and Denmark. by Christopher Adam Gennari Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University 2010 "In 1655 Sweden was the premier military power in northern Europe. When Sweden invaded Poland, in June 1655, it went to war with an army which reflected not only the state’s military and cultural strengths but also its fiscal weaknesses. During 1655 the Swedes won great successes in Poland and captured most of the country. But a series of military decisions transformed the Swedish army from a concentrated, combined-arms force into a mobile but widely dispersed force.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia (D) Netherlands (E) England
    Also in the 500 Questions to Know by Test Day series 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP Biology Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP Calculus Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP Chemistry Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP English Language Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP English Literature Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP Environmental Science Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP Human Geography Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP Microeconomics/Macroeconomics Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP Physics Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP Psychology Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP Statistics Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP U.S. Government & Politics Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP U.S. History Questions to Know by Test Day 5 Steps to a 5: 500 AP World History Questions to Know by Test Day Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher, with the exception that the program listings may be entered, stored, and executed in a computer system, but they may not be reproduced for publication, with the exception that the program listings may be entered, stored, and executed in a computer system, but they may not be reproduced for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of German-Scandinavian Relations
    A History of German – Scandinavian Relations A History of German-Scandinavian Relations By Raimund Wolfert A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Raimund Wolfert 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Table of contents 1. The Rise and Fall of the Hanseatic League.............................................................5 2. The Thirty Years’ War............................................................................................11 3. Prussia en route to becoming a Great Power........................................................15 4. After the Napoleonic Wars.....................................................................................18 5. The German Empire..............................................................................................23 6. The Interwar Period...............................................................................................29 7. The Aftermath of War............................................................................................33 First version 12/2006 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations This essay contemplates the history of German-Scandinavian relations from the Hanseatic period through to the present day, focussing upon the Berlin- Brandenburg region and the northeastern part of Germany that lies to the south of the Baltic Sea. A geographic area whose topography has been shaped by the great Scandinavian glacier of the Vistula ice age from 20000 BC to 13 000 BC will thus be reflected upon. According to the linguistic usage of the term
    [Show full text]
  • WAB Forum Template
    WAB FORUM SUPPLEMENT SEVEN YEARS WAR 1756 – 1763 AD Games Workshop, the Games Workshop logo, Warhammer, Warhammer Historical Wargames and the Warhammer Historical Wargameslogo are trademarks of Games Workshop, Ltd WAB Forum 1 v 0.1 WAB FORUM SUPPLEMENT SEVEN YEARS WAR 1756 – 1763 AD - able to reform into a Square INTRODUCTION - can choose to reform as charge reaction, Ld-test needed, -1 if attacked in flank, -2 in rear - in case they are charged in the flank and a Battalion Gun is attached, simply ignore the gun and it’s crew LINE CAVALRY - count as open order - may add rank bonus up to +1 SPECIAL RULES - able to perform an order MUSKETS BATTALION GUN (75pts) - range 24”, S3, S4 at short range Counts as Light Cannon (see below) but must be attached to a Line - one rank may fire Infantry unit (left or right flank). Must move like the unit, but is unable to - if not moved last turn two ranks may shoot (salvoe), but no further fast march. Cannot move and shoot. Must stay at one flank of the unit. salvoe including next round, enemy units have to make a panic test Have to shoot at the same target as the unit, but normal cannon immediately if they have casualtiesfrom the salvoe restrictions apply. The battalion gun is able to perform a Canister Shot as charge reactionif the unit the gun is attached at will be attacked. ORDERS Each character model enables one line infantry or line cavalry unit with a CHARACTERS EQUIPMENT successful Ld-test to have extra movement or a reform before the Characters may have the equipment of the unit they join at the start of the normal movement phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Swedish Pomerania All of My Life, I Have Held That Belief That My Mother’S Family, the Gast and Knitter Families Came from Germany and Were Therefore, German
    Swedish Pomerania All of my life, I have held that belief that my mother’s family, the Gast and Knitter families came from Germany and were therefore, German. I have ship records of the families leaving Stolp, Germany for England and then across the Atlantic Ocean to the United States. We also know that Stolp which is on the border of Germany and Poland has been held by both countries. I have records from my cousin Neoma Laken of a German bible in the Gast family. I have records showing that the Gast family spoke German when they arrived in Minnesota. However, based on DNA results from Ancestry, MyHeritage and 23and Me, I show over 50 percent Norwegian and at least 25 percent Swedish ancestry and very little from what we now know as Germany or Poland. The two families settled in an entirely Scandinavian Marsh Grove township in Marshall County, Minnesota. In one of her stories Neoma wondered why two German families would settle in that area rather than one of mostly German families. So, of course, I had to do more research and what I found is interesting and may explain it all. Svenska Pommern in Swedish means Swedish Pommern in English and was a Dominion under Swedish rule from 1630 to 1815. The Treaty of Stettin in 1630 gave Sweden the area plus the islands of Rugen, Usedom and Wolin. Swedish King Gustavus Adolphus invaded Europe in the early 1600s and as part of the peace treaty was given parts of Germany including Pomerania. Since Pomerania was ruled by the Swedish King, he gave parts of Pomerania to some of his noblemen, who moved to Pomerania, settled and intermarried with local nobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Towns030306
    The State and the Integration of the Towns of the Provinces of the Swedish Baltic Empire The Purpose of the Paper1 between 1561 and 1660, Sweden expanded Dalong the coasts of the Baltic Sea and throughout Scandinavia. Sweden became the dominant power in the Baltics and northern Europe, a position it would maintain until the early eighteenth century. At the same time, Swedish society was experiencing a profound transformation. Sweden developed into a typical European early modern power-state with a bureaucracy, a powerful mili- tary organization, and a peasantry bending under taxes and conscription. The kingdom of Sweden also changed from a self-contained country to an important member of the European economy. During this period the Swedish urban system developed as well. From being one of the least urbanized European countries with hardly more than 40 towns and an urbanization level of three to four per cent, Sweden doubled the number of towns and increased the urbanization level to almost ten per cent. The towns were also forced by the state into a staple-town system with differing roles in fo- reign and domestic trade, and the administrative and governing systems of the towns were reformed according to royal initiatives. In the conquered provinces a number of other towns now came under Swe- dish rule. These towns were treated in different ways by the state, as were the pro- vinces as a whole. While the former Danish and Norwegian towns were complete- ly incorporated into the Swedish nation, the German and most of the east Baltic towns were not.
    [Show full text]
  • “Swedish Freemasonry in the Caribbean: How St. Barthélemy Turned Into an Island of the IX Th Province ”
    “Swedish Freemasonry in the Caribbean: How St. Barthélemy turned into an Island of the IX th Province ” Andreas Önnerfors Consejo Científico: José Antonio Ferrer Benimeli (Universidad de Zaragoza), Miguel Guzmán-Stein (Universidad de Costa Rica), Eduardo Torres-Cuevas (Universidad de La Habana), Andreas Önnerfors (University of Sheffield), María Eugenia Vázquez Semadeni (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), Roberto Valdés Valle (Universidad Centroamericana “José Simeón Cañas”), Carlos Martínez Moreno (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México) Editor: Yván Pozuelo Andrés (IES Universidad Laboral de Gijón) Director: Ricardo Martínez Esquivel (Universidad de Costa Rica) Dirección web: rehmlac.com/ Correo electrónico: [email protected] Apartado postal: 243-2300 San José, Costa Rica REHMLAC ISSN 1659-4223 17 Vol. 1, Nº 1, Mayo 2009-Noviembre 2009 Fecha de recibido: 6 diciembre 2008 – Fecha de aceptación: 30 febrero 2009 Palabras clave Masonería, Suecia, Caribe, San Bartolomé, siglo XVIII Keywords Freemasonry, Sweden, Caribbean, Saint Barthélemy, 18 th century Resumen Este artículo examina la organización de la masonería en San Bartolomé, sus relaciones con la Gran Logia de Suecia, su estructura y actividades. Relaciones que hasta ahora nunca han sido analizadas. El estudio se centra principalmente entre los años 1797-1807, periodo en donde abundan documentos acerca de los rituales de trabajo, la organización y las ideologías de las logias. Por último, un aporte fundamental de esta investigación está en que por primera son utilizadas fuentes acerca de la orden masónica sueca presentes en los archivos de la logia La Sudermanie de la capital de San Bartolomé, Gustavia. Abstract This paper deals with the establishment of freemasonry on St. Barthélemy, its connections to the Swedish Grand Lodge, its membership structure and activities mainly between 1797 and 1807.
    [Show full text]
  • Denmark and the Duchy of Schleswig 1587-1920
    Denmark and the Duchy of Schleswig 1587-1920 The making of modern Denmark The Duchy of Schleswig Hertugdømmet Slesvig Herzogthum Schleswig c. 1821 The President’s Display to The Royal Philatelic Society London 18th June 2015 Chris King RDP FRPSL 8th July 1587, Entire letter sent from Eckernförde to Stralsund. While there was no formal postal service at this time, the German Hanseatic towns had a messenger service from Hamburg via Lübeck, Rostock, Stettin, Danzig and Königsberg to Riga, and this may have been the service used to carry this letter. RPSL Denmark and the Duchy of Schleswig 1587-1920 The Duchy of Schleswig: Background Speed/Kaerius, 1666-68, from “A Prospect of the Most Famous Parts of the World” The Duchies of Slesvig (Schleswig in German) and Holstein were associated with the Danish Crown from the 15th century, until the Second Schleswig War of 1864 and the seizure by Prussia and Austria. From around 1830 sections of the population began to identify with German or Danish nationality and political movements followed. In Denmark, the National Liberal Party used the Schleswig question as part of their programme and demanded that the Duchy be incorporated in the Danish kingdom under the slogan “Denmark to the Eider". This caused a conflict between Denmark and the German states, which led to the Schleswig-Holstein Question of the 19th century. When the National Liberals came to power in Denmark, in 1848, it provoked an uprising of ethnic Germans who supported Schleswig's ties with Holstein. This led to the First Schleswig War. Denmark was victorious, although more through politics than strength of arms.
    [Show full text]
  • On 23 October 1815, Sweden Lost Its Last Remaining Conquest Of
    Swedish Pomeranian Shipping in the Revolutionary Age (1776–1815) Magnus Ressel n 23 October 1815, Sweden lost its last remaining conquest of the OThirty Years War. As a result of a complicated exchange, Sweden gai- ned Norway as a kingdom to be ruled in personal union by its king. In return, Denmark obtained the little Duchy of Lauenburg, which Prussia had acquired previously from Hanover in exchange for Eastern Frisia, only to be used as a bargaining chip. To make up for differences in the relative importance of these territories, substantial flows of money accompanied the entire clearing pro- cess.1 Swedish Pomerania thus left the Swedish orbit for good. It had been a small province on the southern coast of the Baltic with an area of 4 400 km², the main part stretching from Damgarten to Anklam with Stralsund and Gre- ifswald as the most important cities. The island of Rügen (with another 920 km²) had also belonged to the Swedish possessions in the Holy Roman Em- pire, as had the city of Wismar with a little hinterland (this only until 1803). Magnus Ressel (fil.dr) arbetar som forskare vid universitetet i Bochum. Han skrev sin avhandling på ämnet ”Northern Europe and the Barbary corsairs during the Early Modern Epoch”. Han bedriver för tillfället forskning rörande Hansan, Nederländerna, Danmark och Sverige under Trettioåriga kriget. 64 65 Sweden’s provinces in Germany had been saved twice for the kingdom, in 1678 by France alone and in 1719 by France and England together when they had joined to preserve as much as possible of the weakened country’s German territories.2 Now this was undone forever.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Maritima
    KOMITET NAUK HUMANISTYCZNYCH POLSKIEJ AKADEMII NAUK UNIWERSYTET SZCZECIŃSKI STUDIA MARITIMA Redakcja naukowa Adam Makowski VOLUME XXVII/2 SZCZECIN 2014 Rada Naukowa/Wissenschaftlicher Beirat: Agnieszka Chlebowska (Szczecin), Jerzy Dygdała (Toruń), Andrzej Groth (Gdynia), Bolesław Hajduk (Szczecin–Gdańsk), Gabriela Majewska (Gdańsk), Adam Makowski (Szczecin), Jens E. Olesen (Greifswald), Józef Stanielewicz (Szczecin), Jacek Trzoska (Gdańsk), Raimo Pullat (Tallinn), Jacek Wijaczka (Toruń), Edward Włodarczyk (Szczecin) Komitet Redakcyjny/Redaktionskomitee: Agnieszka Chlebowska (sekretarz redakcji/ Schriftleitung), Adam Makowski (redaktor naukowy/Wissenschaftlicher Redakteur), Edward Włodarczyk (z-ca redaktora naukowego/Stellvertretender wissenschaftlicher Redakteur) Lista recenzentów jest dostępna na stronie/ Die Liste der Rezensenten befindet sich auf der Homepage: www.studiamaritima.pl Tłumaczenie artykułów/Die Übersetzer(innen) der Beiträge: Krzysztof Nerlicki, Małgorzata Osiewicz-Maternowska, Anna Sulikowska, Piotr Sulikowski, Katarzyna Sztandarska, Magdalena Zyga Redakcja językowa/Sprachliche Redaktion: Elżbieta Blicharska, Jörg Hackmann Korekta/Korrektur: Małgorzata Szczęsna Skład/Satz: Iwona Mazurkiewicz Adres Redakcji/Redaktionsanschrift Uniwersytet Szczeciński Instytut Historii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych PL 71–017 Szczecin, ul. Krakowska 71–79 e-mail: [email protected] Publikację wydano w ramach projektu Polsko-niemieckie sympozjum doktorantów „Europa bałtycka – współpraca czy rywalizacja” Wersja elektroniczna czasopisma/Online-Version
    [Show full text]
  • Hohenzollern Prussia: Claiming a Legacy of Legitimacy
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 2015 Hohenzollern Prussia: Claiming a Legacy of Legitimacy Jeremy Brooks Weed Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Weed, Jeremy Brooks, "Hohenzollern Prussia: Claiming a Legacy of Legitimacy" (2015). University Honors Theses. Paper 177. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.185 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. P a g e | 1 Hohenzollern Prussia: Claiming a Legacy of Legitimacy By Jeremy Brooks Weed P a g e | 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction to the Hohenzollerns of Prussia II. Historical Perspectives and a Divided Discourse III. Brandenburg to Prussia IV. The Politics Religion and the International Norms of the 17th and 18th Century V. The Holy Roman Empire and the Internal Politics of Dynastic Claims VI. International Norms of the Early Modern Era and the Relationship of Dynastic Claims VII. The House of Hohenzollern and the Foundations of Prussian Dynastic Claims VIII. The Reign and Achievements of Elector Frederick William IX. From Prince to King the Reign of Frederick I X. King Frederick William I takes Stettin and Centralizes the State XI. From Claims to Prussian Territory: How Frederick II Settled the Claims XII. Conclusion XIII. Works Cited XIV. Appendix A: Maps of Prussia P a g e | 3 I.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81284-9 - A Concise History of Sweden Neil Kent Index More information INDEX Abba, 262 Alsnö, Decree of (1280), 25 abortion, 200, 209 Alvastra, 18 Adam of Bremen, 15 Älvsborg, 64, 66, 67, 69 Addison, Joseph, 123 Alvtegen, Karin, 258 Adelcrantz, Carl Fredrik, 117, 137, 147 Anckarström, Jacob Johan, 137 Adelcrantz, Göran Josua, 112 Andersson, Benny, 262 Adlercreutz, Carl Johan, 152 Andersson, Bibi, 261 Adolph Fredrik, king, 104, 105, 107, Anger, Per, 235 115, 117, 129 Ankarsvärd, Vilhelm Theodor, 206 Aelnoth, 15 Ansgar, Saint, 13 Afghanistan, 264, 269 architecture African colonies, 136 18th century, 115 Age of Freedom, 102 Drottningholm, 117, 133 Ageröd, 2 Gustaf III’s reign, 132–4 Agricola, Mikael, 56, 57 Karl Johan’s reign, 154 agriculture Middle Ages, 48 16th century, 69 Palace of Rosendal, 154–6 18th century, 121–2, 139 Royal Opera House, Stockholm, 137 19th century, 157, 180, 185 Royal Palace, Stockholm, 114–15 Middle Ages, 32–3 arts Al Qaeda, 264 17th century, 75–6 Åland Islands, 172–3, 178, 218–19, 231 19th century, 209–13 Albertus Pictor, 19 20th century, 226–30, 259 Albrekt of Mecklenburg, 27, 28, 29–30, Gustaf III’s reign, 130–4 35, 37 Karl Johan’s reign, 154 alcoholism, 167, 225, 256, 266 Middle Ages, 46–8 Alexander I, tsar, 151, 152, 172 Atterbom, Per Daniel Amadeus, Alexander III, pope, 17 169–70 Alexander VII, pope, 86 Augustenborg, Christian Alfén, Hugo, 214 August von, 152 Alfred, king of England, 5 Augustus II, king of Poland, 91, 92 Almqvist, Carl Jonas Love, 170–1, 209 Axelsson, Ivar,
    [Show full text]