DOCSLIB.ORG

STS 30, 34 and 44- a Rebirth of the Planetary Missions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STS 30, 34 and 44- a Rebirth of the Planetary Missions The Space Congress® Proceedings 1988 (25th) Heritage - Dedication - Vision Apr 1st, 8:00 AM STS 30, 34 And 44- A Rebirth Of The Planetary Missions Ed Bangsund Director of Space Systems Planning Boeing Aerospace Company Seattle, Washington Robert Knutson Planning Staff Administrator Boeing Aerospace Company Seattle, Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Bangsund, Ed and Knutson, Robert, "STS 30, 34 And 44- A Rebirth Of The Planetary Missions" (1988). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 5. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1988-25th/session-10/5 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STS 30, 34 AND 44 - A REBIRTH OF THE PLANETARY MISSIONS Ed Bangsund Robert Knutson Director of Space Systems Planning Planning Staff Administrator Boeing Aerospace Company Boeing Aerospace Company Seattle, Washington Seattle, Washington before it takes up its final flight path to Jupiter. ABSTRACT This new type of trajectory has been dubbed VEEGA, for Venus-Earth-Earth Gravity Assist, No American planetary probe has been launched with arrival at Jupiter to occur six years later since the twin Voyager spacecraft in 1979- in November 1995. The scientific objectives However, within eighteen months beginning of the Galileo mission are investigation of (1) in April 1989, three interplanetary probes will chemical composition and physical state of be shot into deep space from Shuttle cargo Jupiter's atmosphere, (2) chemical composition bays using the Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) as and physical state of the Jovian satellites, and an upper stage booster. In 1986 NASA made (3) the structure and physical dynamics of the the decision to cancel the use of Centaur as Jovian magnetosphere. an upper stage for the Space Shuttle. This action was one of the results of the tragic The third and final mission is Ulysses (presently Challenger accident in January 1986. With scheduled on STS-44 for October 5, 1990). increased safety concerns, it was decided not This mission involves a spacecraft being placed to risk using cryogenic propellant in the Shuttles on a trajectory around the sun normal to the payload bay. As a result of that decision a plane of the ecliptic. The trajectory of Ulysses search for a new upper stage to launch the will involve a fly-by of the planet Jupiter to three planetary spacecraft, stranded without obtain a gravity assist to change its orbit plane a launch system, began. This paper briefly to a solar polar orbit. The primary mission describes the search for a new upper stage objectives include investigation of properties and the resulting decisions, but focuses primarily of the solar corona, solar wind, heliocentric on the methods the selected IUS will fly those magnetic field, cosmic rays, and electromagnetic missions and what they mean in terms of phenomena as a function of the solar latitude. scientific knowledge to all of us. BACKGROUND The first of the three planetary missions to be launched by the Space Shuttle and IUS is The Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) is a two-stage, the Magellan mission (presently scheduled on solid rocket propelled, three axis controlled, STS 30 for April 27, 1989). Upon arrival at inertially navigated upper stage that can provide the planet Venus 15 months after launch, the 5,000 Ibs. of payload to geosynchronous orbit spacecraft will use its own solid rocket motor or boost various planetary orbits to escape to achieve an elliptical polar orbit and then velocities dependent upon their mass. The map the carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid cloud generic IUS vehicle can be configured to be obscured planet surface with its Synthetic used on the Shuttle, Titan 34D, or Titan 4 boost Aperture Radar (SAR). vehicles. The basic generic vehicle includes: stage structure; solid rocket motors and the The Galileo mission (presently scheduled on reaction control subsystem for propulsion; STS 34 for November 2, 1989) involves placing avionics for telemetry, tracking and command, an orbiter around the planet Jupiter as well guidance, navigation and control, data as a probe which will descend into the Jovian management, and thrust vector control; electrical atmosphere. The spacecraft will follow an power sources and electrical cabling; destruct entirely new trajectory to Jupiter that involves hardware; and airborne software. The IUS vehicle a flight to Venus, a gravity assist by that planet, also provides the interface between the and then two gravity-assist flights past Earth spacecraft and the launch vehicle (figure 1). 10-8 - SPACECRAFT INTERFACE PLANE • EQUIPMENT SUPPORT SECTION THRUST VECTOR CONTROL POTENTIOMETER" SOLID ROCKET MOTOR EXTENDIBLE EXIT CON NOZZLE SOLID ROCKET MOTOR INTERSTAGE STRUCTURE • CONTROL SYSTEM Figure 1. Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) implementation of an intensive four-month UPPER STAGE SELECTION NASA effort to investigate alternative launch vehicle capabilities for the near-term NASA The Challenger accident resulted in an extensive planetary missions — Magellan, Galileo, and re-examination and evaluation by NASA of Ulysses. A joint task team was formed and the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) concluded that the two-stage IUS system was and Critical Items List (CIL) for all elements the only known alternative which was currently of the Space Transportation System (STS) and in production, had been integrated into the the upper stages it carried to Earth orbit. Shuttle, had satisfactorily passed all the required Included were the Shuttle/Centaur, a high safety reviews in its required flight configuration, performance, liquid oxygen (02) - liquid hydrogen had successfully flown, and could achieve the (H^) upper stage being developed for future planetary missions' performance and schedule NASA and USAF high energy missions. requirements. The NASA studies showed that the On November 4, 1986 these findings, and other Shuttle/Centaur system as implemented did results of this four-month study were presented not meet STS design criteria. After a detailed to the administrator. Direction was received study of the program options and impacts, it to proceed to implement the Shuttle/IUS based was concluded that cancellation of the alternative by immediately procuring three Shuttle/Centaur program would provide lower IUS two-stage vehicles and one PAM-S for the safety risks for future Shuttle flights and less Magellan, Galileo and Ulysses planetary missions. impact to NASA's resources and other programs. In order to meet the required launch dates for These findings were presented to NASA's the planetary missions three IUS vehicles were administrator in June 1986 for his concurrence re-allocated from the IUS production program and the decision to cancel immediately followed. currently underway. The missions, to which these lUSs had been assigned were not scheduled The decision to terminate the Shuttle/Centaur in the near time frame and could await a program resulted in the immediate replacement production order, figure 2. 10-9 1988 1989 1990 V o rr OoO Mission IU9SJ7^% f I IUS-21 n OoO Mission I 'X^f ...... llUS-22 rt NASA/TDRS-F I iilvia! SMAB Processing f IUS-20 ] X Planetary 0 • Ulysses [lUS-17| o • Magellan I IUS-18 rt • Galileo Qus-ig Figure 2. Replacement IUS Vehicle Buy THE MAGELLAN MISSION 70 to 90 percent of the planet's surface, and thus fulfill its nominal mission. Additional After launch, the Shuttle will ascend to a parking science data expected is surface temperature orbit altitude of 137 nmi inclined at 31 degrees. data returned by passively sensing heat emissions The spacecraft, IUS and Airborne Support from the radiometry experiment, altimetry Equipment configuration that will be installed data with 30-meter resolution, and gravity in the Shuttle is illustrated in figure 3. Total data, obtained by measuring minute deviations weight of this cargo element is approximately in the orbit of the Magellan spacecraft each 49,000 Ibs. After separation from the Shuttle time it circles the planet. Very small variations is accomplished, the IUS will ignite its first in the density of the planet beneath the stage rocket for about two and a half minutes spacecraft will be enough to cause the orbital and its second stage rocket for one and three changes. In turn, these density variations will quarter minutes with only a 150 second coast provide details about the subsurface composition period between the two stage firings. and construction of Venus at that location. This series of subtle changes bears great The launch will use IUS-18, which is a basic implications for the dynamics of Venus' interior IUS two-stage vehicle with very little and the possible effects on the Venusian surface. modification. This IUS had previously been assigned to a Tracking and Data Relay Satellite Thus, the surface data from the radar, altimetry, mission. The IUS will inject Magellan into the and radiometry experiments, combined with transfer orbit that is illustrated in figure 4. the subsurface information from the gravity At injection, the 3475 kg spacecraft will require experiment, will furnish scientists with the a 03 of 7.12 km^/sec^ and will arrive at Venus information to construct a truly global picture in July of 1990. of Venus' geologic history. Upon completion of the Venus Orbit Insertion The highest and most dramatic continent-sized maneuver with its onboard rocket, Magellan highland region on Venus is Ishtar Terra, based will orbit Venus every three hours and nine on topography measurements by the Pioneer minutes. One mapping cycle will take 243 days Venus Orbiter. Ishtar is named for the Assyrian and during that cycle will acquire imaging, goddess of love and war and is about the size radiometry, altimetry, and gravity data from of the continental United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (Cscs)/Rescue Flight Resource Book
    CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 CONTINGENCY SHUTTLE CREW SUPPORT (CSCS)/RESCUE FLIGHT RESOURCE BOOK OVERVIEW 1 Mission Operations CSCS 2 Directorate RESCUE 3 FLIGHT DA8/Flight Director Office Final July 12, 2005 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas FINAL 07/12/05 2-i Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 CONTINGENCY SHUTTLE CREW SUPPORT (CSCS)/RESCUE FLIGHT RESOURCE BOOK FINAL JULY 12, 2005 PREFACE This document, dated May 24, 2005, is the Basic version of the Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (CSCS)/Rescue Flight Resource Book. It is requested that any organization having comments, questions, or suggestions concerning this document should contact DA8/Book Manager, Flight Director Office, Building 4 North, Room 3039. This is a limited distribution and controlled document and is not to be reproduced without the written approval of the Chief, Flight Director Office, mail code DA8, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058. FINAL 07/12/05 2-ii Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 1.0 - OVERVIEW Section 1.0 is the overview of the entire Contingency Shuttle Crew Support (CSCS)/Rescue Flight Resource Book. FINAL 07/12/05 2-iii Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 This page intentionally blank. FINAL 07/12/05 2-iv Verify this is the correct version before using. CSCS/Rescue Flight Resource Book JSC-62900 2.0 - CONTINGENCY SHUTTLE CREW SUPPORT (CSCS) 2.1 Procedures Overview.......................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Envision Conference
    Image credit: JAXA/DART/Damia Bouic NASA/GSFC/U. Arizona http://envisionvenus.eu http:/bit.ly/venus2020 M5/EnVision Project Cosmic Vision mission timeline M3 M1 M2 M5 M4 Image credit: http://envisionvenus.eu ESA Science - adapted from Wikipedia M5/EnVision : timeline Apr. 2016: Release of call for M5 mission Oct. 2016: EnVision proposal submitted Jan. 2017: 1st programmatic evaluation rejected Feb. 2017: EnVision scientific & programmatic evaluation resumes May 2018: ESA selects 3 M5 mission concepts to study Jun. 2018: ESA Science Directorate forms Science Study Team (SST) Nov 2018: CDF study (Phase 0) completed / EnVision Mission Definition Review (MDR) 2019-2020: Industrial phase A study (2 independent ESA contractors) Image credit M5/EnVision Project Mar. 2020 : EnVision Mission Consolidation Review (MCR) Dec. 2020 : EnVision Assessment Study Report (Yellow Book) Feb. 2021 : EnVision Mission Selection Review (MSR) http://envisionvenus.eu Image credit ESA Three very different M5 finalists "A high-energy survey of the early Universe, an infrared observatory to study the formation of stars, planets and galaxies, and a Venus orbiter are to be considered for ESA’s fifth medium class mission in its Cosmic Vision science programme, with a planned launch date in 2032." Spectroscopy from 12 to 230 μ Soft X-ray, X-gamma rays LEO orbit Image credit M5/EnVision Project M5/SPICA Project http://envisionvenus.eu M5/Theseus Project DAY 1 You are warmly invited to join •EnVision mission overview the international conference •Surface to discuss the scientific Magellan heritage investigations of ESA's DAY 2 EnVision mission. •Interior structure (radial : tidal, viscosity, crust, lithosphere structure) The conference will welcome •Activity detection all presentations related to DAY 3 the mission’s payload an its •Atmosphere VEx, Akatsuki Heritage science investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAIL Twins Toast New Year from Lunar Orbit
    Jet JANUARY Propulsion 2012 Laboratory VOLUME 42 NUMBER 1 GRAIL twins toast new year from Three-month ‘formation flying’ mission will By Mark Whalen lunar orbit study the moon from crust to core Above: The GRAIL team celebrates with cake and apple cider. Right: Celebrating said. “So it does take a lot of planning, a lot of test- the other spacecraft will accelerate towards that moun- GRAIL-A’s Jan. 1 lunar orbit insertion are, from left, Maria Zuber, GRAIL principal ing and then a lot of small maneuvers in order to get tain to measure it. The change in the distance between investigator, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Charles Elachi, JPL director; ready to set up to get into this big maneuver when we the two is noted, from which gravity can be inferred. Jim Green, NASA director of planetary science. go into orbit around the moon.” One of the things that make GRAIL unique, Hoffman JPL’s Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) A series of engine burns is planned to circularize said, is that it’s the first formation flying of two spacecraft mission celebrated the new year with successful main the twins’ orbit, reducing their orbital period to a little around any body other than Earth. “That’s one of the engine burns to place its twin spacecraft in a perfectly more than two hours before beginning the mission’s biggest challenges we have, and it’s what makes this an synchronized orbit around the moon. 82-day science phase. “If these all go as planned, we exciting mission,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Shuttle Program
    Space Shuttle program The Space Shuttle Columbia seconds after engine ignition, 1981 (NASA). For the first two missions only, the external fuel tank spray-on foam insulation (SOFI) was painted white. Subsequent missions have featured an unpainted tank thus exposing the orange/rust colored foam insulation. This resulted in a weight saving of over 1,000 lb (450 kg), a savings that translated directly to added payload capacity to orbit. NASA's Space Shuttle, officially called Space Transportation System (STS), is the United States government's sole manned launch vehicle currently in service. The winged shuttle orbiter is launched vertically, carrying usually five to seven astronauts and up to about 22,700 kg (50,000 lbs) of payload into low earth orbit. When its mission is complete, it reenters the earth's atmosphere and makes an unpowered gliding horizontal landing, usually on a runway at Kennedy Space Center. The Space Shuttle orbiter was manufactured by North American Rockwell, now part of the Boeing Company. Martin Marietta (now part of Lockheed Martin) designed the external fuel tank and Morton Thiokol (now part of Alliant Techsystems (ATK)) designed the solid rocket boosters. The Shuttle is the first orbital spacecraft designed for partial reusability. It carries large payloads to various orbits, provides crew rotation for the International Space Station (ISS), and performs servicing missions. While the vehicle was designed with the capacity to recover satellites and other payloads from orbit and return them to Earth, this capacity has not been used often; it is, however, an important use of the Space Shuttle in the context of the ISS program, as only very small amounts of experimental material, hardware needing to be repaired, and trash can be returned by Soyuz.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassini RADAR Sequence Planning and Instrument Performance Richard D
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 47, NO. 6, JUNE 2009 1777 Cassini RADAR Sequence Planning and Instrument Performance Richard D. West, Yanhua Anderson, Rudy Boehmer, Leonardo Borgarelli, Philip Callahan, Charles Elachi, Yonggyu Gim, Gary Hamilton, Scott Hensley, Michael A. Janssen, William T. K. Johnson, Kathleen Kelleher, Ralph Lorenz, Steve Ostro, Member, IEEE, Ladislav Roth, Scott Shaffer, Bryan Stiles, Steve Wall, Lauren C. Wye, and Howard A. Zebker, Fellow, IEEE Abstract—The Cassini RADAR is a multimode instrument used the European Space Agency, and the Italian Space Agency to map the surface of Titan, the atmosphere of Saturn, the Saturn (ASI). Scientists and engineers from 17 different countries ring system, and to explore the properties of the icy satellites. have worked on the Cassini spacecraft and the Huygens probe. Four different active mode bandwidths and a passive radiometer The spacecraft was launched on October 15, 1997, and then mode provide a wide range of flexibility in taking measurements. The scatterometer mode is used for real aperture imaging of embarked on a seven-year cruise out to Saturn with flybys of Titan, high-altitude (around 20 000 km) synthetic aperture imag- Venus, the Earth, and Jupiter. The spacecraft entered Saturn ing of Titan and Iapetus, and long range (up to 700 000 km) orbit on July 1, 2004 with a successful orbit insertion burn. detection of disk integrated albedos for satellites in the Saturn This marked the start of an intensive four-year primary mis- system. Two SAR modes are used for high- and medium-resolution sion full of remote sensing observations by a dozen instru- (300–1000 m) imaging of Titan’s surface during close flybys.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Magellan Health, Inc. 4800 N
    29MAR201601032835 MAGELLAN HEALTH, INC. 4800 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 4400 Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 MagellanHealth.com April 9, 2018 Dear Shareholder: You are cordially invited to attend the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders of Magellan Health, Inc., to be held on Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 7:30 a.m., local time, at Magellan Offices, G-2 Auditorium Level, 4800 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251. This year, three (3) directors are nominated for election to our board of directors. At the meeting, shareholders will be asked to: (i) elect three (3) directors to serve until our 2019 annual meeting; (ii) approve, in an advisory vote, the compensation of our named executive officers; (iii) approve an amendment to our 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase by 300,000 the number of shares available for issuance under the plan; (iv) ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal year 2018; and (v) transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. The accompanying proxy statement provides a detailed description of these proposals. We urge you to read the accompanying materials so that you may be informed about the business to be addressed at the annual meeting. It is important that your shares be represented at the annual meeting. Accordingly, we ask you, whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, to complete, sign and date a proxy and submit it to us promptly or to otherwise vote in accordance with the instructions on your proxy card or other notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Venus' Interior Structure with Envision
    remote sensing Technical Note Determination of Venus’ Interior Structure with EnVision Pascal Rosenblatt 1,*, Caroline Dumoulin 1 , Jean-Charles Marty 2 and Antonio Genova 3 1 Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, UMR-CNRS6112, Université de Nantes, 44300 Nantes, France; [email protected] 2 CNES, Space Geodesy Office, 31401 Toulouse, France; [email protected] 3 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Venusian geological features are poorly gravity-resolved, and the state of the core is not well constrained, preventing an understanding of Venus’ cooling history. The EnVision candidate mission to the ESA’s Cosmic Vision Programme consists of a low-altitude orbiter to investigate geological and atmospheric processes. The gravity experiment aboard this mission aims to determine Venus’ geophysical parameters to fully characterize its internal structure. By analyzing the radio- tracking data that will be acquired through daily operations over six Venusian days (four Earth’s years), we will derive a highly accurate gravity field (spatial resolution better than ~170 km), allowing detection of lateral variations of the lithosphere and crust properties beneath most of the geological ◦ features. The expected 0.3% error on the Love number k2, 0.1 error on the tidal phase lag and 1.4% error on the moment of inertia are fundamental to constrain the core size and state as well as the mantle viscosity. Keywords: planetary interior structure; gravity field determination; deep space mission Citation: Rosenblatt, P.; Dumoulin, C.; Marty, J.-C.; Genova, A.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide to the Magellan Synthetic Aperture Radar Images
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19950018567 2020-06-16T07:22:10+00:00Z User Guide to the Magellan Synthetic Aperture Radar Images Stephen D. Wall Shannon L. McConnell Craig E. Left Richard S. Austin Kathi K. Beratan Mark J. Rokey National Aeronautics and Jet Propulsion Laboratory Space Administration California Institute of Technology Scientific and Technical Pasadena, California Information Branch NASA Reference Publication 1356 March 1995 This publication was prepared at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Contents Iri Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 I_1 The Spacecraft ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 IB Mission Design ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 D Experiment Description ................................................................................................................................................ 15 B Mission Operations ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 [] Notable Events and Problems .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1981 (18th) The Year of the Shuttle Apr 1st, 8:00 AM The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future J. K. Ganoung Manager Spacecraft Integration, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. H. Eaton Delta Launch Program, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Ganoung, J. K. and Eaton, H., "The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future" (1981). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 7. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1981-18th/session-6/7 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DELTA LAUNCH VEHICLE - PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE J. K. Ganoung, Manager H. Eaton, Jr., Director Spacecraft Integration Delta Launch Program McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. INTRODUCTION an "interim space launch vehicle." The THOR was to be modified for use as the first stage, the The Delta launch vehicle is a medium class Vanguard second stage propulsion system, was used expendable booster managed by the NASA Goddard as the Delta second stage and the Vanguard solid Space Flight Center and used by the U.S. rocket motor became Delta's third stage. Government, private industry and foreign coun­ Following the eighteen month development program tries to launch scientific, meteorological, and failure to launch its first payload into or­ applications and communications satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Stages Using Liquid Propulsion and Metallized - Propellants
    NASA NASA-TP-3191 19920007933 Technical Paper 3191 February 1992 Upper Stages Using Liquid Propulsion and Metallized - Propellants NASA NASA Technical Paper 3191 1992 Upper Stages Using Liquid Propulsion and Metallized Propellants Bryan A. Palaszewski Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio NASA National Aeronauticsand Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical InformationProgram Summary (Isp)may be required. Also, because of the limits of the capa- bilityof the IUS and potentiallylimitedavailabilityof the Titan Metallized propellants are liquid propellants with a metal IV/Centaur G-Prime for NASA missions, alternativesto these additive suspended in a gelled fuel. Typically, aluminum par- stages should be considered. ticles are the metal additive. These propellants increase the The largest available stage for the STS is the Inertial Upper density and/or the specific impulse of the propulsion system. Stage (IUS, ref. 1). It can deliver a 2268-kg (5000-Ibm)pay- Usingmetallized propellantsfor volume-and mass-constrained loadto geosynchronousEarth orbit (GEO).However, for plane- upper stages can deliver modest increases inperformance for tary missions, the IUS is limited to low-energy missions. The low Earth orbit to geosynchronous Earth orbit (LEO-GEO) t Galileo mission to Jupiter (ref. 2) was launched on an IUS. and other Earth-orbital transfer missions. However, using Using the Space Transportation System (STS)/IUS, its flight metallized propellants for planetary missionscan deliver great time will be 6.5 yr. With a high-performance cryogenic upper reductions in flight time with a single-stage, upper-stage stage, the flight time could havebeen reduced to 1.5 yr. There system, is not, however, any cryogenic upper stage available that is Tradeoff studies comparing metallized propellant stage compatible with the STS (refs.
    [Show full text]