Shuttle Missions 1981-99.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shuttle Missions 1981-99.Pdf 1 2 Table of Contents Flight Page Flight Page 1981 STS-49 .................................................................................... 24 STS-1 ...................................................................................... 5 STS-50 .................................................................................... 25 STS-2 ...................................................................................... 5 STS-46 .................................................................................... 25 STS-47 .................................................................................... 26 1982 STS-52 .................................................................................... 26 STS-3 ...................................................................................... 5 STS-53 .................................................................................... 27 STS-4 ...................................................................................... 6 STS-5 ...................................................................................... 6 1993 1983 STS-54 .................................................................................... 27 STS-6 ...................................................................................... 7 STS-56 .................................................................................... 28 STS-7 ...................................................................................... 7 STS-55 .................................................................................... 28 STS-8 ...................................................................................... 8 STS-57 .................................................................................... 29 STS-9 ...................................................................................... 8 STS-51 .................................................................................... 30 STS-58 .................................................................................... 30 1984 STS-61 .................................................................................... 31 41-B ........................................................................................ 8 41-C ........................................................................................ 9 1994 41-D ........................................................................................ 9 STS-60 .................................................................................... 32 41-G ........................................................................................ 10 STS-62 .................................................................................... 32 51-A ........................................................................................ 10 STS-59 .................................................................................... 33 STS-65 .................................................................................... 33 1985 STS-64 .................................................................................... 34 51-C ........................................................................................ 10 STS-68 .................................................................................... 35 51-D ........................................................................................ 11 STS-66 .................................................................................... 36 51-B ........................................................................................ 11 51-G ........................................................................................ 12 1995 51-F ......................................................................................... 12 STS-63 .................................................................................... 36 51-I .......................................................................................... 13 STS-67 .................................................................................... 38 51-J ......................................................................................... 13 STS-71 .................................................................................... 39 61-A ........................................................................................ 13 STS-70 .................................................................................... 40 61-B ........................................................................................ 14 STS-69 .................................................................................... 41 STS-73 .................................................................................... 42 1986 STS-74 .................................................................................... 43 61-C ........................................................................................ 14 51-L ......................................................................................... 15 1996 1987 STS-72 .................................................................................... 43 No Shuttle launches conducted. STS-75 .................................................................................... 44 STS-76 .................................................................................... 45 1988 STS-77 .................................................................................... 46 STS-26 .................................................................................... 15 STS-78 .................................................................................... 47 STS-27 .................................................................................... 16 STS-79 .................................................................................... 48 STS-80 .................................................................................... 49 1989 1997 STS-29 .................................................................................... 16 STS-81 .................................................................................... 50 STS-30 .................................................................................... 16 STS-82 .................................................................................... 50 STS-28 .................................................................................... 17 STS-83 .................................................................................... 51 STS-34 .................................................................................... 17 STS-84 .................................................................................... 52 STS-33 .................................................................................... 17 STS-94 .................................................................................... 53 STS-85 .................................................................................... 53 1990 STS-86 .................................................................................... 54 STS-32 .................................................................................... 18 STS-87 .................................................................................... 55 STS-36 .................................................................................... 18 STS-31 .................................................................................... 18 1998 STS-41 .................................................................................... 19 STS-89 .................................................................................... 56 STS-38 .................................................................................... 19 STS-90 .................................................................................... 57 STS-35 .................................................................................... 20 STS-91 .................................................................................... 57 1991 STS-95 .................................................................................... 58 STS-37 .................................................................................... 20 STS-88 .................................................................................... 59 STS-39 .................................................................................... 21 STS-40 .................................................................................... 21 1999 STS-43 .................................................................................... 22 STS-96 .................................................................................... 59 STS-48 .................................................................................... 22 STS-93 .................................................................................... 60 STS-44 .................................................................................... 23 STS-103 .................................................................................. 61 1992 Note: Launch and landing data based on Shuttle Flight Data and In-Flight STS-42 .................................................................................... 23 Anomaly List, Revision U, Johnson Space Center. Metric conversions are STS-45 .................................................................................... 24 provided starting in 1992. Crew flight numbers are provided beginning in 1995. 3 MAJOR SHUTTLE PAYLOADS FLOWN CHRONOLOGICALLY FLIGHT
Recommended publications
  • STS-103 Table of Contents Mission Overview
    Refining the Hubble Space Telescope's View of the Universe SPACESPACESPACE SHUTTLESHUTTLESHUTTLE PRESSKITPRESSKITPRESSKIT WWW.SHUTTLEPRESSKIT.COM Updated November 24, 1999 STS-103 Table of Contents Mission Overview ......................................................................................................... 1 Mission Profile .............................................................................................................. 8 Crew.............................................................................................................................. 10 Flight Day Summary Timeline ...................................................................................................14 Rendezvous Rendezvous, Retrieval and Deploy ......................................................................................................18 EVA Hubble Space Telescope Extravehicular Activity ..................................................................................21 EVA Timeline ........................................................................................................................................24 Payloads Fine Guidance Sensor .........................................................................................................................27 Gyroscopes .........................................................................................................................................28 New Advanced Computer .....................................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • March 8 – 11, 2020 San Diego
    MARCH 8 – 11, 2020 SAN DIEGO LEARN . CO NN EC T . M A K E W A V E S . TABLE OF CONTENTS Chair’s SUNDAY Tuesday Plenary 03 Welcome 68 – VCs Talk Back Schedule-at-a- Dive in 27 Glance WEDNESDAY 04 with Navie Sunday Schedule-at-a- Roundtable 28 Meeting Schedule 79 Glance 10 Discussions Fireside Chat Wednesday Tips for 28 Featuring 82 Meeting 14 First-Timers Chief Judge Paul Schedule Redmond Michel General Closing Plenary 15 Information MONDAY 99 and Keynote Featuring Professor Marketing Schedule-at-a- Antwi Akom 20 Course 31 Glance AUTM Technology Monday 102 Leadership 21 Valuation Course 36 Meeting Schedule and Staff 21 Certified Opening Plenary AUTM Licensing 36 and Keynote 106 Awards Professional Featuring astronaut (CLP) Exam Ellen Ochoa AUTM Review Course 113 Scholarships TUESDAY Negotiation Exhibitor and Schedule-at-a- 117 22 Strategies and 57 Sponsor Tactics Course Glance Directory Oncology and 62 Tuesday Moderators, 23 Research Tools Meeting Schedule 132 Facilitators and Partnering Forum Speakers Index Equity, Diversity 2020 62 AUTM and Inclusion in Hotel 24 Track System the Technology 136 Floor Plan Transfer Profession AUTM.NET/ Breakfast 2 CHAIR’S WELCOME SAME AUTM - LARGER REACH, BIGGER IMPACT What a year for AUTM, culminating in you. Since we’re meeting just feet November when our Association was from the shore, what better way to awarded a five-year, $16 million grant highlight the environmental chal- to do what it does best — provide edu- lenges and opportunities facing our cation and meetings support to the planet than by organizing a session Federal Labs Consortium’s (FLC) 300 on technologies that support ocean labs, facilities and research centers.
    [Show full text]
  • XXIX Congress Report XXIX Planetary Congress • Austria • 2016 Photos: OEWF
    XXIX Congress Report XXIX Planetary Congress • Austria • 2016 Photos: OEWF 1 John-David Bartoe, 2 Alexander Ivanchenkov, 3 Ulrich Walter, 4 Gerhard Thiele, 5 Georgi Iva- nov, 6 Yuri Gidzenko, 7 Bertalan Farkas, 8 Kevin Ford, 9 Pavel Vinogradov, 10 Charlie Walker, 11 Kimiya Yui, 12 Anatoli Artsebarskii, 13 Shannon Lucid, 14 Reinhold Ewald, 15 Claudie Haigneré, 16 Joe Acaba, 17 Ernst Messerschmid, 18 Jan Davis, 19 Franz Viehbock, 20 Loren Shriver, 21 Miroslaw Hermaszewski. 22 Sultan bin Salman al-Saud, 23 Yang Liwei, 24 Richard Garriott, 25 Mark Brown, 26 Carl Walz, 27 Bill McArthur, 28 Owen Garriott, 29 Anna Fisher, 30 George Zam- ka, 31 Rick Hieb, 32 Jerry Ross, 33 Alexander Volkov, 34 André Kuipers, 35 Jean-Pierre Haign- eré, 36 Toktar Aubakirov, 37 Kay Hire, 38 Michael Fincke, 39 John Fabian, 40 Pedro Duque, 41 Michael Foreman, 42 Sergei Avdeev, 43 Vladimir Kovolyonok, 44 Alexandar Aleksandrov, 45 Alexander Alexandrov, 46 Drew Feustel, 47 Dumitru Prunariu, 48 Alexei Leonov, 49 Rusty Sch- weickart, 50 Klaus-Dietrich Flade, 51 Anton Shkaplerov, 52 Alexander Samokutyaev, 53 Sergei Krikalev, 54 Viktor Savinykh, 55 Soichi Noguchi, 56 Bonnie Dunbar, 57 Vladimir Aksyonov, 58 Scott Altman, 59 Yuri Baturin, 60 Susan Helms, 61 Ulf Merbold, 62 Stephanie Wilson, 63 Chiaki Mukai, 64 Charlie Camarda, 65 Julie Payette, 66 Dick Richards, 67 Yuri Usachev, 68 Michael Lo- pez-Alegria, 69 Jim Voss, 70 Rex Walheim, 71 Oleg Atkov, 72 Bobby Satcher, 73 Valeri Tokarev, 74 Sandy Magnus, 75 Bo Bobko, 76 Helen Sharman, 77 Susan Kilrain, 78 Pam Melroy, 79 Janet Kavandi, 80 Tony Antonelli, 81 Sergei Zalyotin, 82 Frank De Winne, 83 Alexander Balandin, 84 Sheikh Muszaphar, 85 Christer Fuglesang, 86 Nikolai Budarin, 87 Salizhan Sharipov, 88 Vladimir Titov, 89 Bill Readdy, 90 Bruce McCandless II, 91 Vyacheslav Zudov, 92 Brian Duffy, 93 Randy Bresnik, 94 Oleg Artemiev XXIX Planetary Congress • Austria • 2016 One hundred and four astronauts and cosmonauts from 21 nations gathered Oc- tober 3-7, 2016 in Vienna, Austria for the XXIX Planetary Congress of the Associa- tion of Space Explorers.
    [Show full text]
  • AIAA Fellows
    AIAA Fellows The first 23 Fellows of the Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences (I) were elected on 31 January 1934. They were: Joseph S. Ames, Karl Arnstein, Lyman J. Briggs, Charles H. Chatfield, Walter S. Diehl, Donald W. Douglas, Hugh L. Dryden, C.L. Egtvedt, Alexander Klemin, Isaac Laddon, George Lewis, Glenn L. Martin, Lessiter C. Milburn, Max Munk, John K. Northrop, Arthur Nutt, Sylvanus Albert Reed, Holden C. Richardson, Igor I. Sikorsky, Charles F. Taylor, Theodore von Kármán, Fred Weick, Albert Zahm. Dr. von Kármán also had the distinction of being the first Fellow of the American Rocket Society (A) when it instituted the grade of Fellow member in 1949. The following year the ARS elected as Fellows: C.M. Bolster, Louis Dunn, G. Edward Pendray, Maurice J. Zucrow, and Fritz Zwicky. Fellows are persons of distinction in aeronautics or astronautics who have made notable and valuable contributions to the arts, sciences, or technology thereof. A special Fellow Grade Committee reviews Associate Fellow nominees from the membership and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors, which makes the final selections. One Fellow for every 1000 voting members is elected each year. There have been 1980 distinguished persons elected since the inception of this Honor. AIAA Fellows include: A Arnold D. Aldrich 1990 A.L. Antonio 1959 (A) James A. Abrahamson 1997 E.C. “Pete” Aldridge, Jr. 1991 Winfield H. Arata, Jr. 1991 H. Norman Abramson 1970 Buzz Aldrin 1968 Johann Arbocz 2002 Frederick Abbink 2007 Kyle T. Alfriend 1988 Mark Ardema 2006 Ira H. Abbott 1947 (I) Douglas Allen 2010 Brian Argrow 2016 Malcolm J.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Contributions
    Open Source CubeSat Workshop 2019 Report of Contributions https://new.satnogs.org/e/3 Open Source Cub … / Report of Contributions An Open Source Implementation o … Contribution ID: 1 Type: Talk An Open Source Implementation of the CCSDS SLE Services in Python Monday, 14 October 2019 09:30 (20 minutes) An Open Source Implementation of the CCSDS SLE Services in Python Milenko Starcik (1), Fabian Burger (1), Artur Scholz (1, 2), Tiago Nogueira (1) (1) VisionSpace Technologies GmbH (2) LibreCube Initiative The Open Source CubeSat community is currently lacking the capability to use existing radio amateur ground-station networks to transfer live data to the end users / mission control centres. SatNOGS, the biggest network of the kind, provides services for archiving and offline distribution of telemetry data. At the moment, an operator using the SatNOGS network is not able to receive telemetry in real-time and make use of the station uplink chain, when available, for direct com- manding. We believe that the community could benefit considerably from services that provide real-time monitoring and control over a distributed ground-station network. As a first step to address the current limitations we introduce in this contribution a newfreeand open source implementation of the CCSDS Space Link Extension (SLE) services in Python. The SLE standard, used by all major space agencies, is one of the most adopted CCSDS standards and is key to enable the inter-agency utilisation of ground-station networks like the Deep Space Network. Additionally, it is supported by most, if not all, private ground-station operators. SLE services have proven reliable, and can be used even for missions, like most CubeSats, that do not adhere to the CCSDS telemetry and telecommand frame and packet formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Navigation, Microdischarge Plasma Thruster, and Distributed Communications Experiments on the FASTRAC Mission
    SSC03-XI-04 Relative Navigation, Microdischarge Plasma Thruster, and Distributed Communications Experiments on the FASTRAC Mission G. Holt, S. Stewart, J. Mauldin, T. Campbell, P. Eckho®, H. Elmasri, B. Evans M. Garg, J. Greenbaum, M. Linford, M. Poole, E. G. Lightsey, L. L. Raja The University of Texas at Austin Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics 1 University Station, C0600, Austin, TX 78712 Tel: (512)471-7593, [email protected] T. Ebinuma Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK Tel: +44 (0)1483 683882, [email protected] Abstract. Enabling technologies for nanosatellite formations will be demonstrated under the Formation Autonomy Spacecraft with Thrust, Relnav, Attitude, and Crosslink (FASTRAC) program. Two flight-ready nanosatellites will be designed, fabricated, integrated, and tested during the two year design period. Three speci¯c new and innovative technologies which will be demonstrated during the mission are Relative Navigation, Plasma Microthrusters, and Distributed Communications. A sensor set consisting of Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, magnetometer, and MEMS Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) will be used to determine position and coarse attitude. Using a radio crosslink, the two satellites will exchange state vector information and perform sub-meter level accuracy relative navigation. Each satellite will also contain a Microdischarge Plasma Thruster (MPT) developed at UT-Austin. This innovative device is capable of generating low-thrust, high-e±ciency propulsion at low power levels using microdischarge plasmas. The ability of the MPT to extend the life of the orbit will be determined by monitoring the orbit decay rates of the two vehicles as well as the MEMS IMU.
    [Show full text]
  • International Space Medicine Summit 2018
    INTERNATIONAL SPACE MEDICINE SUMMIT 2018 October 25–28, 2018 • Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy • Houston, Texas INTERNATIONAL SPACE MEDICINE SUMMIT 2018 October 25–28, 2018 • Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy • Houston, Texas About the Event As we continue human space exploration, much more research is needed to prevent and/or mitigate the medical, psychological and biomedical challenges spacefarers face. The International Space Station provides an excellent laboratory in which to conduct such research. It is essential that the station be used to its fullest potential via cooperative studies and the sharing of equipment and instruments between the international partners. The application of the lessons learned from long-duration human spaceflight and analog research environments will not only lead to advances in technology and greater knowledge to protect future space travelers, but will also enhance life on Earth. The 12th annual International Space Medicine Summit on Oct. 25-28, 2018, brings together the leading physicians, space biomedical scientists, engineers, astronauts, cosmonauts and educators from the world’s spacefaring nations for high-level discussions to identify necessary space medicine research goals as well as ways to further enhance international cooperation and collaborative research. All ISS partners are represented at the summit. The summit is co-sponsored by the Baker Institute Space Policy Program, Texas A&M University College of Engineering and Baylor College of Medicine. Organizers Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy The mission of Rice University’s Baker Institute is to help bridge the gap between the theory and practice of public policy by drawing together experts from academia, government, media, business and nongovernmental organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographic Essay and Chapter Notes
    BIBLIOGRAPHIC ESSAY People make history; then, the history becomes documented through primary texts and official records. However, the history of Shuttle-Mir comes first from those who experienced it. This book presents the human side through a detailed chronology and background information. Much of the material was provided by the NASA Johnson Space Center Oral History Project for which dozens of Shuttle-Mir participants (see list below) offered their words, their stories, their memories. Historian Stephen Ambrose wrote in the introduction to his book, Citizen Soldiers, “Long ago my mentors … taught me to let my characters speak for themselves by quoting them liberally. They were there. I wasn't. They saw with their own eyes; they put their lives on the line. I didn't. They speak with an authenticity no one else can match. Their phrases, their word choices, their slang are unique — naturally enough, as their experiences were unique.” 1 Shuttle-Mir was likewise unique. And, its oral histories will continue through the years to illustrate the humanity and illuminate the importance of the Program. Also, this book reflects the changing of the times. The Internet came of age during the Shuttle-Mir Program, and many of the book’s sources reflect the Internet’s capabilities. For historical background, NASA history offices maintain an ever-growing library of electronic texts. NASA’s various Centers maintain Internet Web sites pertinent to their missions, such as the Shuttle launch records at Kennedy Space Center and human spaceflight information at the Johnson Space Center (JSC). During and after the Program, JSC hosted a Shuttle-Mir Web site that included weekly updates and interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Programme
    th 68International Astronautical IAC Congress ADELAIDE, AUSTRALIA 25 - 29 SEPTEMBER 2017 FINAL PROGRAMME www.iac2017.org Industry Anchor Sponsor UNLOCKING IMAGINATION, FOSTERING INNOVATION AND STRENGTHENING SECURITY THE SKY IS NOT THE LIMIT. AT LOCKHEED MARTIN, WE’RE ENGINEERING A BETTER TOMORROW. The Orion spacecraft will carry astronauts on bold missions to the moon, Mars and beyond — missions that will excite the imagination and advance the frontiers of science. Because at Lockheed Martin, we’re designing ships to go as far as the spirit of exploration takes us. Learn more at lockheedmartin.com/orion. © 2017 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION THE SKY IS THE LOWER LIMIT Booth #16 From deep sea to deep space, together we’re exploring the future. At sea, on land and now in space, exciting new partnerships between France and South Australia are constantly being fostered to inspire shared enterprise and opportunity. And as the International Astronautical Congress and the IAF explore ways to shape the future of aeronautics and space research, you can be sure that South Australia will be there. To find out more about opportunities for innovation and investment in South Australia visit welcometosouthaustralia.com INNOVATION THAT’S OUT OF THIS WORLD Vision and perseverance are the launch pads of innovation. Boeing is proud to salute those who combine vision with passion to turn dreams into reality. Contents 1. Welcome Messages ____________________________________________________________________________ 2 1.1 Message from the President of the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) ............................................. 2 1.2 Message from the Local Organising Committee (LOC) ....................................................................................... 3 1.3 Message from the International Programme Committee (IPC) Co-Chairs .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Ellen Weber, Ph.D
    Biographical Data Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center National Aeronautics and Houston, Texas 77058 Space Administration March 2018 MARY ELLEN WEBER, PH.D. NASA ASTRONAUT (FORMER) PERSONAL DATA: Dr. Weber was born in 1962 in Cleveland, Ohio. Bedford Heights, Ohio, is her hometown. She is married to Dr. Jerome Elkind, who is originally from Bayonne, New Jersey. She is an avid skydiver and golfer, and also enjoys scuba diving. Her mother, Joan Weber, currently resides in Mentor, Ohio. Her father, Andrew Weber, Jr., is deceased. EDUCATION: Graduated from Bedford High School in 1980; received a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering (with honors) from Purdue University in 1984; received a Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry from the University of California at Berkeley in 1988; and received a Master of Business Administration degree from Southern Methodist University in 2002. EXPERIENCE: During her undergraduate studies at Purdue, Dr. Weber was an engineering intern at Ohio Edison, Delco Electronics and 3M. Following this, in her doctoral research at Berkeley, she explored the physics of gas-phase chemical reactions involving silicon. She then joined Texas Instruments to research new processes for making computer chips. Texas Instruments assigned her to a consortium of semiconductor companies, SEMATECH, and subsequently, to Applied Materials, to create a revolutionary reactor for manufacturing next-generation chips. She has received one patent and published eight papers in scientific journals. Dr. Weber has logged nearly 5,000 skydives and is an active skydiver, with 13 silver and bronze medals to date at the U.S. National Skydiving Championships and a world record in 2002 for the largest freefall formation, with 300 skydivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin Chang-Díaz, Chairman and CEO, Ad Astra Rocket Company
    Franklin Chang-Díaz, Chairman and CEO, Ad Astra Rocket Company: “The production of hydrogen through the electrolysis of water is a way of storing energy for use when needed” gerencia de riesgos y seguros Franklin Chang-Díaz, Chairman and CEO, Ad Astra Rocket Company: “The production of hydrogen through the electrolysis of water is a way of storing energy for use when needed” After earning a degree in Mechanical Engineering and a PhD in Plasma Physics, Franklin Chang-Díaz joined NASA in the early ‘80s as the first Latin American astronaut ever. Over 25 years of active service, he completed seven space missions and spent over 1,600 hours in space. After retiring, he founded Ad Astra Rocket, an aerospace engineering company that is researching electric propulsion engines and applying these advances to public transportation in his native Costa Rica The start of your space career dates back to the 1980s. What was the situation back then and what prospects were available? It was the start of the space shuttle era. Flights began in 1981, but they were very infrequent, as the technology was still under development. In 1980, there were only American astronauts at NASA, except for two Europeans (Claude Nicollier from Switzerland and Wubbo Ockels from the Netherlands) who entered the program in my group, marking the start of collaboration with the European Space Agency, which had just been established. My first space flight was in January 1986. During my 25 years at NASA, I participated as an astronaut on seven missions, sharing the world record for space flights with my colleague Jerry Ross.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Foale
    NASA-5 Michael Foale | Collision and Recovery | Foale Bio | Needed on Mir | Meanwhile | Collision and Recovery Mike Foale went to Mir full of enthusiasm in spite of the fire and other problems during the NASA-4 increment. He expected hard work, some discomfort, and many challenges; and he hoped to integrate himself fully into the Mir-23 crew. The challenges became enormous when a Progress resupply vehicle accidentally rammed the space station, breaching the Back to Spektr module and causing a dangerous depressurization. The NASA-5 Mir-23 crew worked quickly to save the station; and in the TOC troubled months that followed, Foale set an example of how to face the more dangerous possibilities of spaceflight. Meanwhile on the ground, NASA’s Mir operations were changing, too. In part because of the problems, Foale’s NASA-5 increment catalyzed a broader and deeper partnership with the Russian Space Agency. Mike Foale’s diverse cultural, educational, and family background helped him adapt to his life onboard Mir. Born in England in 1957 to a Royal Air Force pilot father and an American mother, his early childhood included living overseas on Royal Air Force bases. An English boarding school education taught him how to get along with strangers; and, as a youth, he wrote his own plan for the future of spaceflight. At Cambridge University, Foale earned a Bachelor of Arts in physics and a doctorate in astrophysics. But, in the midst of this progress, disaster struck. Foale was driving through Yugoslavia with his fiance and brother when an auto accident took their lives but spared his own.
    [Show full text]