DOCSLIB.ORG

The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Space Congress® Proceedings 1981 (18th) The Year of the Shuttle Apr 1st, 8:00 AM The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future J. K. Ganoung Manager Spacecraft Integration, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. H. Eaton Delta Launch Program, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Ganoung, J. K. and Eaton, H., "The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future" (1981). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 7. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1981-18th/session-6/7 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DELTA LAUNCH VEHICLE - PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE J. K. Ganoung, Manager H. Eaton, Jr., Director Spacecraft Integration Delta Launch Program McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. INTRODUCTION an "interim space launch vehicle." The THOR was to be modified for use as the first stage, the The Delta launch vehicle is a medium class Vanguard second stage propulsion system, was used expendable booster managed by the NASA Goddard as the Delta second stage and the Vanguard solid Space Flight Center and used by the U.S. rocket motor became Delta's third stage. Government, private industry and foreign coun­ Following the eighteen month development program tries to launch scientific, meteorological, and failure to launch its first payload into or­ applications and communications satellites. It bit, a remarkable series of successful missions has been operational since 1960 and currently established the Delta as a highly reliable has launches scheduled through the 1985 time launch vehicle. A follow-on buy of 14 vehicles period. This paper presents a summary of Delta of greater boost capability continued the history, its current vehicle configuration, the production line. The ensuing years proved to various modifications underway to satisfy ever- be examples of excellent management and tech­ increasing payload performance demands and a nological skill as the Delta Program flourished. look into additional uprating possibilities to The payload performance capability increased by meet potential future requirements. steady increments to satisfy the ever-increasing weight requirements of new spacecraft. Origi­ nally the U.S. Weather Bureau provided the HISTORICAL ROLE OF DELTA demands for increased orbit energy. The scien­ tific community also demanded an increase in On May 13, 1960, the first of what would become booster capability. Then the communications the most utilized non-military U.S. launch satellites became, and are presently, the pre­ vehicle lifted off from the Eastern Test Range. dominant influence in demanding greater payload Delta's first payload was Echo I, a low-altitude volume and weight capability the Delta. passive communications satellite, weighing launch vehicle. By emphasizing a low-cost pro­ 81.6 Kg (179 Ibs); however, this launch was not gram philosophy utilizing various cost- successful. On November 15, 1980, Delta No. 153 effective techniques, the actual increase in placed SBS-A, an active communications satellite cost was only a fraction of the payload perfor­ weighing 1085 Kg (2388 Ibs) into a geosynchro­ mance increase. Simultaneously the emphasis on nous transfer orbit. During the intervening using previously qualified systems during 20 year period, a remarkable launch record has vehicle uprating and designing redundancy into been established by the Delta launch vehicle in new systems kept the launch reliability at an terms of increased vehicle physical size, unprecedented high level, improved reliability, minimal cost increase and outstanding payload performance improvement. A summary of some of the significant modifi­ cations to the original Delta is shown in Table I. Figure 1 graphically illustrates the The origin of Delta dates back to 1955 when the vehicle configuration evolution. Note the U.S. Air Force initiated development of the numerous examples of the use of "existing" THOR Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM) systems and components in this building block and the U.S. Navy was developing the Vanguard approach to uprating. The payload capability launch vehicle to be used during the Inter­ growth, associated with these vehicle modifi­ national Geophysical Year. In 1959 the Douglas cations is depicted in Figure 2. Table II Aircraft Company (now the McDonnell Douglas illustrates the variety of spacecraft launched Corporation) was given a contract by NASA's to date. Of the 153 Delta launches, 142 Goddard Space Flight Center to develop, inte­ been successful so that the overall reliability grate and produce 12 launch vehicles for use as is now 92*8 percent (Figure 3). 6-1 TABLE I. GROWTH HISTORY OF DELTA DELTA MODEL YEAR FAIRING FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE THIRD STAGE DESIGNATION 1960 Modified THOR Vanguard prop, Vanguard X-248 Delta system 1962 Uprated MB-3 engine A 1962 Lengthened tankage Higher energy oxidizer Transistorized guidance elect. 1963 Bulbous Scout developed C fairing X-258 replaced X-248 1964 Augmented thrust D using THOR developed strap-on solid rocket motors 1965 Larger Larger diameter USAF developed E fairing from propel! ant tanks FW-4 replaced USAF Agena from the Able-Star X-258 stage stage. Restart capability 1968 Surveyor retro- J motor modified. TE-364-3 re­ placed FW-4 196S Lengthened LOX and L,M.N RP-1 tanks. In­ creased dia. of RP-1 tanks 1970 Added 3 solid M6 rockets to total 6 1972 Introduced UBT to Titan transtage 903 accommodate 9 engine. Strap- solid rockets down inertia! guidance 1972 Increased dia. Increased length Added interstage Increased motor 1914 and length of tanks. Isogrld and suspended length structure stage within TE-364-4 1973 Replaced MB-3 2914 engine with more powerful RS-27 engine 1975 Increased size of 3914 solid rockets. C-IV replaced C-II 8-2 Tl D C O 33 Spacecraft Wt. (Kg) 3D m m N 0> CD Lr o O) O m Spacecraft Weight (Pounds) TABLE II. SPACECRAFT LAUNCHED BY DELTA Meteorological Satellites Scientific Satellites Improved TIROS Operations System (ITOS) series Explorer series Nimbus series Pioneer series Synchronous Meteorological Satellite (SMS) BIOS series series ESRO-GEOS ESRO Meteosat Aeronomy Explorer (AE) series Japanese Geosynchronous Meteorological Interplanetary Monitoring Platform (IMP) Satellite (GMS) series TIROS-N series ESRO COS-B Geosynchronous Operational Environmental LAGEOS Satellite (GOES) series GEOS series (NASA) Solar Maximum Mission (NASA) Applications Satellites Orbiting Solar Observatory (OSO) International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) Relay series SCATHA (USAF) Syncom series LANDSAT series Canadian/U.S. Communication Technology Foreign Communications Satellites Satellite (CIS) Italian SIRIO Canadian TELESAT series ESRO Orbital Test Satellite (OTS) French/German SYMPHONIE series Earth Resources Technology Satellite (ERTS) NATO II and III series Japanese Broadcast Satellite (BSE) Japanese Communication Satellite (CS) ISEE series United Kingdom Skynet series Indonesian (PALAPA) series U.S. Domestic Communications Satellites International Communications Satellites Tel star series Western Union (WESTAR) series INTELSAT II series COMSAT Maritime Satellite (MARISAT) series INTELSAT III series Satellite Business Systems (SBS) RCA SATCOM series SATCOM RAE NIMBUS LANDSAT SYMPHONI E Successfully Orbited 142 of 153 50 Communication/Navigation 35 Meteorological 54 Scientific SSIE 3 Earth Observation ITOS FIGURE 3, DELTA LAUNCH HISTORY 1960 THRU 1980 6-4 DELTA TODAY tion of vehicle subsystems is included below, (Reference Figure 5). As in the past 20 years Delta continues to play an important role in NASA's launch vehicle Structural Systems planning activities. The delay of the reusable Space Shuttle has provided an increased impor­ The vehicle consists of five major assemblies: tance to the expendable Delta as an alternate first stage, interstage, second stage, third NASA back-up launch capability. In addition, stage, and fairing. The first stage has an due to the continually expanding requirements engine compartment which houses the main engine, from the scientific and communications satellite vernier engines, pressurization and electrical communities Delta is providing dedicated launch subsystems, and provides the attachments for the opportunities for the overflow from the Shuttle strap-on solid propel 1 ant motors. A liquid manifests. oxygen tank, a centerbody equipment compartment and a fuel tank complete the first stage. The interstage extends from the top of the first The configurations of the Delta which are stage to the second stage mini-skirt. The currently being utilized are primarily the second stage includes the main engine, propel- models 3914 and 3910/PAM. The nomenclature used lant tanks, pressurization and attitude control to define Delta configurations is shown in systems, and guidance and electrical systems. Figure 4. While the RAM has been developed by The second stage is entirely encapsulated within the McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Corporation the interstage and the lower portion of the pay- and is not part of the Delta, it is used as a load shroud (referred to as the fairing), and is third stage of the two-stage 3910 Delta con­ structurally supported by the mini-skirt and figuration. Overall the vehicle is 116 feet
Recommended publications
  • This Boeing Team's Skills at Producing Delta IV Rocket Fairings Helped

    This Boeing Team's Skills at Producing Delta IV Rocket Fairings Helped

    t’s usually the tail end of the rocket that gets all the early atten- other work. But they’d jump at the chance to work together again. tion, providing an impressive fiery display as the spacecraft is Their story is one of challenges and solutions. And they attribute hurled into orbit. But mission success also depends on what’s their success to Lean+ practices and good old-fashioned teamwork. Ion top of the rocket: a piece of metal called the payload fairing “The team took it upon themselves to make an excellent that protects the rocket’s cargo during the sometimes brutal ride product,” said program manager Thomas Fung. “We had parts to orbital speed. issues and tool problems, but the guys really stepped up and took “There’s no room for error,” said Tracy Allen, Boeing’s manu- pride and worked through the issues.” facturing production manager for a Huntington Beach, Calif., team The aluminum fairing team went through a major transition that made fairings for the Delta IV. The fairing not only protects the when Boeing merged its Delta Program with Lockheed Martin’s payload from launch to orbit but also must jettison properly for Atlas Program to form United Launch Alliance in 2006. deployment of the satellite or spacecraft. “There were a lot of process changes in the transition phase Allen and his colleagues built the 65-foot-long (20-meter-long) because we were working with a new company,” Fung said. “We aluminum isogrid fairings for the Delta IV heavy-lift launch vehicle. had part shortages because of vendor issues, and that caused The design was based on 41 similar fairings Boeing made for the an impact to the schedule.
  • Douglas Missile & Space Systems Division

    Douglas Missile & Space Systems Division

    ·, THE THOR HISTORY. MAY 1963 DOUGLAS REPORT SM-41860 APPROVED BY: W.H.. HOOPER CHIEF, THOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AEROSPACE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DOUGLAS MISSILE & SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION ABSTRACT This history is intended as a quick orientation source and as n ready-reference for review of the Thor and its sys­ tems. The report briefly states the development of Thor, sur'lli-:arizes and chronicles Thor missile and booster launch­ inGs, provides illustrations and descriptions of the vehicle systcn1s, relates their genealogy, explains sane of the per­ fon:iance capabilities of the Thor and Thor-based vehicles used, and focuses attention to the exploration of space by Douelas Aircraf't Company, Inc. (DAC). iii PREFACE The purpose of The Thor History is to survey the launch record of the Thor Weapon, Special Weapon, and Space Systems; give a systematic account of the major events; and review Thor's participation in the military and space programs of this nation. The period covered is from December 27, 1955, the date of the first contract award, through May, 1963. V �LE OF CONTENTS Page Contract'Award . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Background • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • l Basic Or�anization and Objectives • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Basic Developmenta� Philosophy . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 Early Research and Development Launches • • • ·• • • • • • • • • • 4 Transition to ICBM with Space Capabilities--Multi-Stage Vehicles . 6 Initial Lunar and Space Probes ••••••• • • • • • • •
  • Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2

    Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2

    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140002716 2019-08-29T14:36:45+00:00Z Liquid Propulsion Systems – Evolution & Advancements Launch Vehicle Propulsion & Systems LPTC Liquid Propulsion Technical Committee Rick Ballard Liquid Engine Systems Lead SLS Liquid Engines Office NASA / MSFC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted, unless for course participation and to a paid course student, in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of AIAA and/or course instructor. Contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Professional Development Program, Suite 500, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4344 Modules 1. Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2. LRE Applications 3. Liquid Propellants 4. Engine Power Cycles 5. Engine Components Module 1: Rocket Propulsion TOPICS Fundamentals • Thrust • Specific Impulse • Mixture Ratio • Isp vs. MR • Density vs. Isp • Propellant Mass vs. Volume Warning: Contents deal with math, • Area Ratio physics and thermodynamics. Be afraid…be very afraid… Terms A Area a Acceleration F Force (thrust) g Gravity constant (32.2 ft/sec2) I Impulse m Mass P Pressure Subscripts t Time a Ambient T Temperature c Chamber e Exit V Velocity o Initial state r Reaction ∆ Delta / Difference s Stagnation sp Specific ε Area Ratio t Throat or Total γ Ratio of specific heats Thrust (1/3) Rocket thrust can be explained using Newton’s 2nd and 3rd laws of motion. 2nd Law: a force applied to a body is equal to the mass of the body and its acceleration in the direction of the force.
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM

    L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM

    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
  • BR-248 Part of Our Daily Lives

    BR-248 Part of Our Daily Lives

    BR-248 8/19/05 11:18 AM Page 3 BR-248 August 2005 Part of Our Daily Lives 3 BR-248 8/19/05 11:18 AM Page 1 Contents Satellite Telecommunications – Part of Our Daily Lives Satellite Telecommunications – What For? 2 Advantages over Terrestrial Systems 3 Orbits 4 The Satcom Market 5 Role of the European Space Agency 6 ESA Telecom Department 7 More Than 30 Years of Satcom Experience 8 Investing in New Technology 9 Broadcasting 10 SATMODE – A New Dimension for Interactive Satellite-based TV 11 Mobile Communications 12 Telemedicine – Medical Care from Space 13 Distance Learning via Satellite 14 Satellites Save Lives 15 Bridging the Digital Divide 16 AlphaBus, the New European Platform for the Next Generation of Telecommunications Satellites 17 AmerHis – The First Switchboard in Space 18 The Future of Satellite Telecommunications 19 1 BR-248 8/19/05 11:18 AM Page 2 Satellite Telecommunications – What For? Without us realising it, satellite communications permeate our lives. Many everyday events that we take for granted happen because telecommunications satellites are in orbit, 36 000 km above our heads - they are reliable and can be used in a plethora of ways. • Did you know that many news- • Did you know that when you make papers and magazines are a call from an aircraft or cruise boat, produced centrally, but printed it is transferred via satellite? locally? The content of the paper is sent to the printing plants using • Did you know that satellites are satellite links. being used for tele-education, telemedicine and video-confer- • Did you
  • Orion Capsule Launch Abort System Analysis

    Orion Capsule Launch Abort System Analysis

    Orion Capsule Launch Abort System Analysis Assignment 2 AE 4802 Spring 2016 – Digital Design and Manufacturing Georgia Institute of Technology Authors: Tyler Scogin Michel Lacerda Jordan Marshall Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Mission Profile ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................ 8 2. Conceptual Design ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Design Process ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Vehicle Performance Characteristics ......................................................................................... 15 2.3 Vehicle/Sub-Component Sizing ................................................................................................. 15 3. Vehicle 3D Model in CATIA ................................................................................................................ 22 3.1 3D Modeling Roles and Responsibilities: .................................................................................. 22 3.2 Design Parameters and Relations:............................................................................................
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems

    Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems

    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
  • Space Shuttle Program

    Space Shuttle Program

    Space Shuttle program The Space Shuttle Columbia seconds after engine ignition, 1981 (NASA). For the first two missions only, the external fuel tank spray-on foam insulation (SOFI) was painted white. Subsequent missions have featured an unpainted tank thus exposing the orange/rust colored foam insulation. This resulted in a weight saving of over 1,000 lb (450 kg), a savings that translated directly to added payload capacity to orbit. NASA's Space Shuttle, officially called Space Transportation System (STS), is the United States government's sole manned launch vehicle currently in service. The winged shuttle orbiter is launched vertically, carrying usually five to seven astronauts and up to about 22,700 kg (50,000 lbs) of payload into low earth orbit. When its mission is complete, it reenters the earth's atmosphere and makes an unpowered gliding horizontal landing, usually on a runway at Kennedy Space Center. The Space Shuttle orbiter was manufactured by North American Rockwell, now part of the Boeing Company. Martin Marietta (now part of Lockheed Martin) designed the external fuel tank and Morton Thiokol (now part of Alliant Techsystems (ATK)) designed the solid rocket boosters. The Shuttle is the first orbital spacecraft designed for partial reusability. It carries large payloads to various orbits, provides crew rotation for the International Space Station (ISS), and performs servicing missions. While the vehicle was designed with the capacity to recover satellites and other payloads from orbit and return them to Earth, this capacity has not been used often; it is, however, an important use of the Space Shuttle in the context of the ISS program, as only very small amounts of experimental material, hardware needing to be repaired, and trash can be returned by Soyuz.
  • Design for Demise Analysis for Launch Vehicles

    Design for Demise Analysis for Launch Vehicles

    A first design for demise analysis for launch vehicles Henrik Simon, Stijn Lemmens Space debris: Inactive, manmade objects in space Source: ESA Overview Introduction Fundamentals Modelling approach Results and discussion Summary and outlook What is the motivation and task? INTRODUCTION Motivation . Mitigation: Prevention of creation and limitation of long-term presence . Guidelines: LEO removal within 25 years . LEO removal within 25 years after mission end . Casualty risk limit for re-entry: 1 in 10,000 Rising altitude Decay & re-entry above 2000 km Source: NASA Source: NASA Solution: Design for demise Source: ESA Scope of the thesis . Typical design of upper stages . General Risk assessment . Design for demise solutions to reduce the risk ? ? ? Risk A Risk B Risk C Source: CNES How do we assess the risk and simulate the re-entry? FUNDAMENTALS Fundamentals: Ground risk assessment Ah = + 2 Ai � ℎ = =1 � Source: NASA Source: NASA 3.5 m 5.0 m 2 2 ≈ ≈ Fundamentals: Re-entry simulation tools SCARAB: Spacecraft-oriented approach . CAD-like modelling . 6 DoF flight dynamics . Break-up / fragmentation computed How does a rocket upper stage look like? MODELLING Modelling approach . Research on typical design: . Elongated . Platform . Solid Rocket Motor . Lack of information: . Create common intersection . Deliberately stay top-level and only compare effects Modelling approach Modelling approach 12 Length [m] 9 7 5 3 2 150 300 500 700 800 1500 2200 Mass [kg] How much is the risk and how can we reduce it? SIMULATIONS Example of SCARAB re-entry simulation 6x Casualty risk of all reference cases Typical survivors Smaller Smaller fragments fragments Pressure tanks Pressure tanks Main tank Engine Main structure + tanks Design for Demise .
  • Interstellar Probe on Space Launch System (Sls)

    Interstellar Probe on Space Launch System (Sls)

    INTERSTELLAR PROBE ON SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM (SLS) David Alan Smith SLS Spacecraft/Payload Integration & Evolution (SPIE) NASA-MSFC December 13, 2019 0497 SLS EVOLVABILITY FOUNDATION FOR A GENERATION OF DEEP SPACE EXPLORATION 322 ft. Up to 313ft. 365 ft. 325 ft. 365 ft. 355 ft. Universal Universal Launch Abort System Stage Adapter 5m Class Stage Adapter Orion 8.4m Fairing 8.4m Fairing Fairing Long (Up to 90’) (up to 63’) Short (Up to 63’) Interim Cryogenic Exploration Exploration Exploration Propulsion Stage Upper Stage Upper Stage Upper Stage Launch Vehicle Interstage Interstage Interstage Stage Adapter Core Stage Core Stage Core Stage Solid Solid Evolved Rocket Rocket Boosters Boosters Boosters RS-25 RS-25 Engines Engines SLS Block 1 SLS Block 1 Cargo SLS Block 1B Crew SLS Block 1B Cargo SLS Block 2 Crew SLS Block 2 Cargo > 26 t (57k lbs) > 26 t (57k lbs) 38–41 t (84k-90k lbs) 41-44 t (90k–97k lbs) > 45 t (99k lbs) > 45 t (99k lbs) Payload to TLI/Moon Launch in the late 2020s and early 2030s 0497 IS THIS ROCKET REAL? 0497 SLS BLOCK 1 CONFIGURATION Launch Abort System (LAS) Utah, Alabama, Florida Orion Stage Adapter, California, Alabama Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle RL10 Engine Lockheed Martin, 5 Segment Solid Rocket Aerojet Rocketdyne, Louisiana, KSC Florida Booster (2) Interim Cryogenic Northrop Grumman, Propulsion Stage (ICPS) Utah, KSC Boeing/United Launch Alliance, California, Alabama Launch Vehicle Stage Adapter Teledyne Brown Engineering, California, Alabama Core Stage & Avionics Boeing Louisiana, Alabama RS-25 Engine (4)
  • The Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage (ACES)- a Low-Cost, Low-Risk Approach to Space Exploration Launch

    The Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage (ACES)- a Low-Cost, Low-Risk Approach to Space Exploration Launch

    The Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage (ACES)- A Low-Cost, Low-Risk Approach to Space Exploration Launch J. F. LeBar1 and E. C. Cady2 Boeing Phantom Works, Huntington Beach CA 92647 Space exploration top-level objectives have been defined with the United States first returning to the moon as a precursor to missions to Mars and beyond. System architecture studies are being conducted to develop the overall approach and define requirements for the various system elements, both Earth-to-orbit and in-space. One way of minimizing cost and risk is through the use of proven systems and/or multiple-use elements. Use of a Delta IV second stage derivative as a long duration in-space transportation stage offers cost, reliability, and performance advantages over earth-storable propellants and/or all new stages. The Delta IV second stage mission currently is measured in hours, and the various vehicle and propellant systems have been designed for these durations. In order for the ACES to have sufficient life to be useful as an Earth Departure Stage (EDS), many systems must be modified for long duration missions. One of the highest risk subsystems is the propellant storage Thermal Control System (TCS). The ACES effort concentrated on a lower risk passive TCS, the RL10 engine, and the other subsystems. An active TCS incorporating a cryocoolers was also studied. In addition, a number of computational models were developed to aid in the subsystem studies. The high performance TCS developed under ACES was simulated within the Delta IV thermal model and long-duration mission stage performance assessed.
  • Trade Studies Towards an Australian Indigenous Space Launch System

    Trade Studies Towards an Australian Indigenous Space Launch System

    TRADE STUDIES TOWARDS AN AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Engineering by Gordon P. Briggs B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc. (Astron) School of Engineering and Information Technology, University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy January 2010 Abstract During the project Apollo moon landings of the mid 1970s the United States of America was the pre-eminent space faring nation followed closely by only the USSR. Since that time many other nations have realised the potential of spaceflight not only for immediate financial gain in areas such as communications and earth observation but also in the strategic areas of scientific discovery, industrial development and national prestige. Australia on the other hand has resolutely refused to participate by instituting its own space program. Successive Australian governments have preferred to obtain any required space hardware or services by purchasing off-the-shelf from foreign suppliers. This policy or attitude is a matter of frustration to those sections of the Australian technical community who believe that the nation should be participating in space technology. In particular the provision of an indigenous launch vehicle that would guarantee the nation independent access to the space frontier. It would therefore appear that any launch vehicle development in Australia will be left to non- government organisations to at least define the requirements for such a vehicle and to initiate development of long-lead items for such a project. It is therefore the aim of this thesis to attempt to define some of the requirements for a nascent Australian indigenous launch vehicle system.