DOCSLIB.ORG

INTEGRATED SPACE PLAN (Preliminary)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CRITICAL PATH AMERICAN SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM INTEGRATED SPACE PLAN Space Transportation (NSTS) Systems Division FIRST INTERNATIONAL RMS GENERATION EXPENDABLE LAUNCH (INTERNATIONAL) OF VEHICLE FLEET (Preliminary) IUS UNITED STATES LAUNCH VEHICLE CAPABILITES REUSABLE SPACECRAFT PRIVATE LAUNCH VERSION 1.1 FEBRUARY, 1989 VEHICLE # TO LEO # TO GEO GEO-CIRCULAR FIRST FLIGHT VEHICLES ALS 200,000 1998 * THE AMERICAN SPACE SHUTTLE (ELV’S) EMU SHUTTLE C 150,000 20,000 (CENTAUR) 1994 1983 PRODUCED BY RONALD M. JONES D/385-210 SPACE 55,000 5,500 (IUS) 1981 1983 * CHALLENGER OV-099 SHUTTLE 6,500 (TOS) * COLUMBIA OV-102 ABOUT THIS DIAGRAM: TITAN 4 40,000 12,500 10,000 (CENTAUR) 1989 OV-103 * DISCOVERY GOVERNMENT - The Rockwell Integrated Space Plan (ISP) is a very long range systematic perspective of America’s and the TITAN 3 33,000 8,600 4,200 (IUS) 1965 MMU * ATLANTIS OV-104 COMMERCIAL SATELLITE Western World’s space program. Its 100-plus-year vision was created from the integration of numerous NASA ATLAS 2 14,400 5,200 2,500 1991 EARTH-TO-ORBIT * TBD OV-105 DEPLOYMENT long-range studies including the project Pathfinder case studies, recommendations from the National ATLAS 1 12,300 1959 AND IN-SPACE Commission on Space’s report to the President, the Ride report to the NASA Administrator, and the new DELTA 2 11,100 3,190 1,350 (PAM-D) 1988 SATELLITE RETRIEVAL * THE SOVIET SPACE SHUTTLE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS National Space Policy Directive. Special initiatives such as the four Pathfinder scenarios or those described in DELTA 7,800 1960 AND SERVICING * BURAN the Ride Report (i.e., Mission To Planet Earth, Exploration of the Solar System, Outpost on the Moon, and TITAN 2 5,500 1965 DEFENSE SATELLITES Humans to Mars) are integral parts of the ISP. These initiatives as well as the agenda described in the National SCOUT 475 1961 VOYAGER II SOLAR MAX / ARIANE 3 Commision on Space report, are shown by shading the appropriate boxes involved. These shaded versions are URANUS ENCOUNTER SPACE SHUTTLE ENHANCEMENTS, SPACE TELESCOPE included separately as attachments to the ISP. The ISP is not meant to be a definitive plan for the development LAUNCH VEHICLES OF EUROPE AND JAPAN PLANETARY / SCIENTIFIC MISSION TYPES of space, but rather a compilation of evolutionary opportunities for our near-term and long-range space MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION, YLOADS VEHICLE # TO LEO # TO GEO COUNTRY FIRST FLIGHT activities. PRECURSOR A ARIANE 4 ARIANE 3 5,690 EUROPE 1984 AN INVIGORATED ELV FLEET The ISP can be read from top to bottom or left to right. From top to bottom, vertical column elements are ARIANE 4 9,260 EUROPE 1988 ROBOTIC SPACELAB SATELLITE REFUELING TITAN 2 phased in chronologically to support centerline milestones. Reading across the columns from left to right will ARIANE 5 46,000 14,960 EUROPE 1996 EXPLORATION AND U.S. NATIONAL POLICY (INTERNATIONAL) CAPABILITY yield the total scope of required activity within a given time period in support of the total “integrated” plan. The centerline of the ISP is the critical path defined by National Space Policy which closely resembles the H-1 2,300 JAPAN 1986 SPUR SPACE RECOVERY MID-SIZE P NSTS H-2 9,000 JAPAN 1992 GPS TDRS RETURN-TO-FLIGHT NASA Office of Exploration case study 4 scenario — Lunar Outpost To Early Mars Evolution. The Space 1988 1988 CONSTELLATION CONSTELLATION Shuttle and Space Station are essential initial elements; their value increases through the 1990’s as SUBORBITAL LOFT-1 / E’PRIME infrastructure evolves. Arrowed lines between boxes depict evolutionary, supporting, or synergistic SOVIET PHOBOS ABUNDANT NEAR-EARTH EXTRATERRESTRIAL RESOURCES PAYLOAD MARKET relationships. Double-arrowed lines between boxes are communication / data links. Bold lines are trunk lines ENCOUNTER OV-105 PHOBOS/ ELEMENT EXTENDED DELTA 2 (MLV-1) with numerous (2 or more) branches stemming from along their length. Boxes with bold outlines are either RESOURCE MOON ASTEROIDS* COMETS CONTRACT AWARD DEIMOS NAME DURATION ORBITER long-range (centerline) objectives or key “enabling programs” important because their development affects the Al X ALUMINUM MAGELLAN HUBBLE TITAN 3 / 34D development of many other programs. Boxes with double lines are in-space transportation nodes. The ISP is SPACE TELESCOPE C X C X CARBON chronologically portrayed in five year time intervals because this is a practical segment of time for planning Ca X CALCIUM AND COMMERCIAL SPACE FACILITIES TITAN 4 VOYAGER II IN-SPACE and implementation of program objectives. Obviously, the dates shown have an uncertainty which increases Fe X M IRON SPACEHAB NEPTUNE with time, but the chronology is intended to be consistent. Finally, the large bubbles represent the synergistic H X C X HYDROGEN ARE WESTERN PRECURSORS RESEARCH & STARFIRE / SSI summation of the individual elements of that period. They are the highest level groups of goals: plateaus of He3 X HELIUM 3 SUBORBITAL ET DEVELOPMENT TO human achievement attainable through a comprehensive execution of the depicted ISP elements. Mg X MAGNESIUM GALILEO APPLICATIONS ILV-1 / AMROC N X C X NITROGEN GRO PERMANENT PV-105 Ni X M NICKEL EDO YLOADS PEGASUS / OSC ULYSSES DELIVERY A O X C X OXYGEN MID-SIZE PAYLOAD P ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL Si X SILICON (INTERNATIONAL) HUMAN PRESENCE MARKET CDSF ATLAS 2 (MLV-2) Space Transportation Systems Division Ti TITANIUM 12214 Lakewood Blvd. H2O ? X C X WATER MARS IN SPACE SMALL OV-106 TETHERED JAPANESE H-2 HLC Downey, California 90241 OBSERVER * METALLIC=M EVOLVABLE OMV CONTRACT AWARD ? SYSTEMS / TSS 1993 CARBONACEOUS=C * THE SOVIET SPACE STATION FREEDOM 1993 ADVANCED SECOND Attn: Ed Repic, Project Manager 1993 SOURCE SRB / LRB Lunar and Planetary Systems LEO ET RESOURCE BASE SOLAR SAIL ELV DEPLOYMENT Mail Code AD21 LEGEND DEMONSTRATION POSSIBLITY * THE SOVIET SPACE STATION MIR ET / ACC MISSION TO PLANET LIGHTSAT CLASS ELEMENT EARTH - ELEMENT PAYLOAD MARKET ISP Program Element RESOURCE LBS/TANK NASA’S SHUTTLE “C” / NAME EVOLVABLE OTV & DATA INTEGRATION CRAF SHUTTLE DERIVED Key Enabling Program Al 56,490 HEO AND (not on the critical path) C 2,760 CISLUNAR COORBITING LOW HEAVY LIFT CAPABILITY POLAR ORBIT Cr 188 CHROMIUM TIONS FTS INCLINATION PLATFORMS In-space Transportation Node STARPROBE TRANSPORTATION MATURING TIONS ACTIITIES Cu 3,450 COPPER SOLAR ARRAYS AMERICAN NASP / X-30 Fe 415 CENTAUR / SDV AND SHUTTLE AND CREW RETURN VEHICLE US / STATION STRUCTURE (FIRST FLIGHT LATE ‘94) Plateaus or eras of human H 466 DEEP SPACE CAPABILITY APPLICA AXAF POLAR ORBITING MPE and technical achievement INTERNATIONAL ABILITY LUNAR OBSERVER OPERATIONS APPLICA Mg 268 ELV FLEET INTERNATIONAL SPACE SLC-6 VANDENBERG ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE DUMP SPACE STATION STATION MODULES Supporting, evolutionary or N 246 2 STAGE LEO-GEO-LEO SIRTF UTILIZATION CAP OBSERVATION ACC PROJECT synergistic interrelationship Ni 200 STV CAPABILITY / PLATFORMS (4 PROPULSION SYSTEMS SPUR FREE ACEHAB LOGISTICS ELEMENTS LIFT ET PLATFORMS DEPLOYED O 1,725 SP MOMV EUROPEAN ARIANE 5 AND LUNAR LANDING MISSION FOR CIT Communication or data links Si 690 ENTERPRISE LAUNCH CAPABILITY VY 1994 THRU 1997) SITE RECON ACE SHUTTLE EVOLUTIONS Ti 220 INTERPLANETARY GEO MPE BIOSPHERE PLANET EARTH DOD SPACE STATION SP HEA Trunk line (two or more branches) MISSION ? OBSERVATION ELEMENT / ACTIVITIES PLANT AND ANIMAL Zn 173 ZINC EXPANSION SPACE HARBORING / VIVARIUM LAB DOD’S ALS- MANNED POLAR PLATFORMS DEPLOYED- SERVICING / TENDING & NASA / DOD ORBITING SPACE Critical Path / Timeline LUNAR ROVER / 5 DEPLOYED 1996 - 2000 1998 FREE FLYING RESEARCH/ 1998 SPACE STATION LEO PROPELLANT DEPOT MANUFACTURING LABS HEAVY LIFT VEHICLE SHUTTLE 1998 SAMPLE RETURN PARTIALLY CLOSED SOVIET AND CHINESE COMPONENT CELSS MISSIONS ? REMOTE TENDED GEO LAUNCH VEHICLES INDEPENDENT LEO ENABLES THE EUROPEAN TRANSPORTATION NODE VARIABLE “G” BIO-MEDICAL SOLAR DYNAMICS HERMES VEHICLE # TO LEO # TO GEO MARS ACEHAB CENTAUR HLV OR MLV AND FUEL DEPOT ? IN-SPACE DEEP SPACE PLANETARY ORBITAL PLANE WESTERN ROVER / SAMPLE SP RESEARCH FACILITY DEEP SPACE MISSIONS MISSIONS DEPLOYMENT ENERGIA 220,000 RETURN MISSIONS SHUTTLE 66,000 COMMERCIAL MMW FISSION SPACE SHUTTLE PROLIFERATION OF MANNED OTV LEO QUARANTINE POWER GENERATION SL-13 43,000 (PROTON) EXTERNAL TANK PASSENGER MODULE ? SATURN-TITAN MANNED SPACE REUSABLE SPACECRAFT SL-12 43,000 (PROTON) TRANSFER VEHICLE ACTIVITY DERIVED WORKSHOPS SL-16 33,000 CASSINI MISSION COMMERCIAL AND (WET / DRY) (INTERNATIONAL) SL-4 16,500 DEFENSE SAT LAUNCHES ET DERIVED GAMMA SDI / DOD POLAR ORBIT * THE NASA NASP * BIOSPHERE RESEARCH TION SL-3 13,900 EXTERNAL TANK RAY TELESCOPE A LAUNCH PROGRAMS EXTERNAL TANK SL-14 12,100 MAN TENDED DEPLOYMENT * THE ESA HERMES MERCURY GEO * IN-SPACE COMMERCE LEO EXTERNAL TANK DERIVED PLATFORMS SL-11 8,800 ORBITER AND FACILITIES * THE NASDA HOPE SL-6 4,600 RESOURCE BASE / GRAVITY GRADIENT ACE ST THE AMERICAN NDV STABILIZATION * THE GERMAN SANGER SL-8 3,800 * SOLAR SYSTEM EXPANSION MOMENTUM RESERVOIR SSTO OPERATIONAL INCREASED AEROBRAKE CAPABILITY * THE BRITISH HOTOL LONG MARCH 3 5,500 PHOBOS SAMPLE TETHERED SYSTEMS CAPABILITY LONG MARCH 4 8,800 RETURN MISSION STRATEGIC WESTERN SOLAR POWERED UNMANNED GEO THE JAPANESE H-II MAN TENDED GEO 2003 ELECTRIC PROPULSION RESOURCE BASE COMM AND ERT EUROPEAN SP 2003 COMM PLATFORMS ON-ORBIT HOPE HEAVY AND 2003 MARS AERONOMY PLATFORM TENDING ASTRONOMY LDF ORBITAL PLANE ORBITER IN LEO MEDIUM LIFT ELV CAPABILITY LUNAR ELECTRIC PILOTED LUNAR TRANSFER LUNAR ORBIT CAPABILITY- TIONS CARGO VEHICLE RETURN-TO-MOON STAGING / FACILITY THE AMERICAN * MLV-1 LUNAR PILOTED VEHICLE SUBSTANTIAL T COMET
Recommended publications
  • International Space Exploration Strategy Group International Space Exploration

    International Space Exploration Strategy Group International Space Exploration

    INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY GROUP INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP ADVANCING THE EXPLORATION FRONTIER For the last forty years, human In recent years multiple reports define exploration in the coming space exploration has made have recommended international decades. significant progress through partners come together for The group will bring together the international collaboration. The strategic planning activities. interests of all human spaceflight Apollo-Soyuz Test Project and However, many national partners, rather than national Shuttle-Mir Programs marked government planning activities interests subject to changing the end of the Space Race, are severely limited in their political influences. and advanced long duration consideration of international This project provides a unique spaceflight. The International partners. Furthermore, opportunity for current and Space Station (ISS) is now in its government and industry recent graduate student second decade as a continuously planners may not have access researchers to collaborate with occupied human outpost in Low- to the latest technologies being others from around the world. Earth Orbit (LEO). While we developed at leading research Most importantly, participants expect productive utilization of institutions around the world. will have the opportunity to ISS through at least 2020, there We believe an international influence the government and is currently no internationally graduate student working group industry decision makers that recognized program for human is well-suited to generate and define future human exploration exploration beyond LEO. communicate the ideas that will strategy. 3 INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP LEADERSHIP Edward Crawley is President of the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech).
  • Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander Macdonald, Editor in The

    Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander Macdonald, Editor in The

    EARLY DRAFT - NASAWATCH.COM/SPACEREF.COM Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander MacDonald, Editor In the next decade, NASA will seek to expand humanity’s presence in space beyond the International Space Station in low-Earth orbit to a new habitation platform orbiting the moon. By the late 2020’s, astronauts will live and work far deeper in space than ever before. The push to cis-lunar orbit is part of a stepping-stone approach to extend our reach to Mars and beyond. This decision to explore ever farther destinations is a familiar pattern in the history of American space exploration. Another major pattern with historical precedent is the transition from public sector exploration to private sector commercialization. After the government has developed and demonstrated a capability in space, whether it be space-based communications or remote sensing, the private sector has realized its market potential. As new companies establish a presence, the government withdraws from the market. In 2015, we are once again at a critical stage in the development of space. The most successful long-term human habitation in space, orbiting the Earth continuously since 1998, is the International Space Station. Currently at the apex of its capabilities and the pinnacle of state-of-the-art space systems, it was developed through the investments and labors of over a dozen nations and is regularly re-supplied by cargo delivery services. Its occupants include six astronauts and numerous other organisms from Earth’s ecosystems from bacteria to plants to rats. Research is conducted on the spacecraft from hundreds of organizations worldwide ranging from academic institutions to large industrial companies and from high-tech start-ups to high-school science classes.
  • Planetary Report Report

    Planetary Report Report

    The PLANETARYPLANETARY REPORT REPORT Volume XXIX Number 1 January/February 2009 Beyond The Moon From The Editor he Internet has transformed the way science is On the Cover: Tdone—even in the realm of “rocket science”— The United States has the opportunity to unify and inspire the and now anyone can make a real contribution, as world’s spacefaring nations to create a future brightened by long as you have the will to give your best. new goals, such as the human exploration of Mars and near- In this issue, you’ll read about a group of amateurs Earth asteroids. Inset: American astronaut Peggy A. Whitson who are helping professional researchers explore and Russian cosmonaut Yuri I. Malenchenko try out training Mars online, encouraged by Mars Exploration versions of Russian Orlan spacesuits. Background: The High Rovers Project Scientist Steve Squyres and Plane- Resolution Camera on Mars Express took this snapshot of tary Society President Jim Bell (who is also head Candor Chasma, a valley in the northern part of Valles of the rovers’ Pancam team.) Marineris, on July 6, 2006. Images: Gagarin Cosmonaut Training This new Internet-enabled fun is not the first, Center. Background: ESA nor will it be the only, way people can participate in planetary exploration. The Planetary Society has been encouraging our members to contribute Background: their minds and energy to science since 1984, A dust storm blurs the sky above a volcanic caldera in this image when the Pallas Project helped to determine the taken by the Mars Color Imager on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter shape of a main-belt asteroid.
  • Stability of Planets in Binary Star Systems

    Stability of Planets in Binary Star Systems

    StabilityStability ofof PlanetsPlanets inin BinaryBinary StarStar SystemsSystems Ákos Bazsó in collaboration with: E. Pilat-Lohinger, D. Bancelin, B. Funk ADG Group Outline Exoplanets in multiple star systems Secular perturbation theory Application: tight binary systems Summary + Outlook About NFN sub-project SP8 “Binary Star Systems and Habitability” Stand-alone project “Exoplanets: Architecture, Evolution and Habitability” Basic dynamical types S-type motion (“satellite”) around one star P-type motion (“planetary”) around both stars Image: R. Schwarz Exoplanets in multiple star systems Observations: (Schwarz 2014, Binary Catalogue) ● 55 binary star systems with 81 planets ● 43 S-type + 12 P-type systems ● 10 multiple star systems with 10 planets Example: γ Cep (Hatzes et al. 2003) ● RV measurements since 1981 ● Indication for a “planet” (Campbell et al. 1988) ● Binary period ~57 yrs, planet period ~2.5 yrs Multiplicity of stars ~45% of solar like stars (F6 – K3) with d < 25 pc in multiple star systems (Raghavan et al. 2010) Known exoplanet host stars: single double triple+ source 77% 20% 3% Raghavan et al. (2006) 83% 15% 2% Mugrauer & Neuhäuser (2009) 88% 10% 2% Roell et al. (2012) Exoplanet catalogues The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia http://exoplanet.eu Exoplanet Orbit Database http://exoplanets.org Open Exoplanet Catalogue http://www.openexoplanetcatalogue.com The Planetary Habitability Laboratory http://phl.upr.edu/home NASA Exoplanet Archive http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu Binary Catalogue of Exoplanets http://www.univie.ac.at/adg/schwarz/multiple.html Habitable Zone Gallery http://www.hzgallery.org Binary Catalogue Binary Catalogue of Exoplanets http://www.univie.ac.at/adg/schwarz/multiple.html Dynamical stability Stability limit for S-type planets Rabl & Dvorak (1988), Holman & Wiegert (1999), Pilat-Lohinger & Dvorak (2002) Parameters (a , e , μ) bin bin Outer limit at roughly max.
  • Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office May 1988

    Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office May 1988

    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE MAY 1988 A SPECIAL STUDY THE NASA PROGRAM IN THE 1990s AND BEYOND The Congress of the United States Congresssional Budget Of'f'ice NOTES All costs are expressed in 1988 dollars of budget authority, unless otherwise noted. All years are fiscal years, except when applied to launch schedules. PREFACE The United States space program stands at a crossroads. The momentum of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) program over the last 20 years has brought NASA to a point where new activities will require substantial increases in the agency's budget. Critics of the NASA program have called for even more ambi- tious goals, most prominently an expansion of manned space flight to the Moon or Mars. Fiscal concerns, however, may limit even the more modest set of activities envisioned by NASA. This special study, requested by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans- portation, examines the broad options for the U.S. space program in the 1990s. In keeping with the mandate of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to provide objective nonpartisan analysis, the report makes no recommendations. David H. Moore, of CBO's Natural Resources and Commerce Division, prepared the report under the supervision of Everett M. Ehrlich. Frances M. Lussier of CBO's National Security Division and Michael Sieverts of CBO's Budget Analysis Division provided valu- able comments and assistance. Many outside reviewers made useful comments and criticisms. Amanda Balestrieri edited the manuscript. Margaret Cromartie prepared early drafts of the report, and Kathryn Quattrone prepared the final draft for publication.
  • Can There Be Additional Rocky Planets in the Habitable Zone of Tight Binary

    Can There Be Additional Rocky Planets in the Habitable Zone of Tight Binary

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–10 () Printed 24 September 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Can there be additional rocky planets in the Habitable Zone of tight binary stars with a known gas giant? B. Funk1⋆, E. Pilat-Lohinger1 and S. Eggl2 1Institute for Astronomy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 2IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, Paris, France ABSTRACT Locating planets in Habitable Zones (HZs) around other stars is a growing field in contem- porary astronomy. Since a large percentage of all G-M stars in the solar neighborhood are expected to be part of binary or multiple stellar systems, investigations of whether habitable planets are likely to be discovered in such environments are of prime interest to the scientific community. As current exoplanet statistics predicts that the chances are higher to find new worlds in systems that are already known to have planets, we examine four known extrasolar planetary systems in tight binaries in order to determine their capacity to host additional hab- itable terrestrial planets. Those systems are Gliese 86, γ Cephei, HD 41004 and HD 196885. In the case of γ Cephei, our results suggest that only the M dwarf companion could host ad- ditional potentially habitable worlds. Neither could we identify stable, potentially habitable regions around HD 196885A. HD 196885 B can be considered a slightly more promising tar- get in the search forEarth-twins.Gliese 86 A turned out to be a very good candidate, assuming that the system’s history has not been excessively violent. For HD 41004 we have identified admissible stable orbits for habitable planets, but those strongly depend on the parameters of the system.
  • Space Shuttle Program

    Space Shuttle Program

    Space Shuttle program The Space Shuttle Columbia seconds after engine ignition, 1981 (NASA). For the first two missions only, the external fuel tank spray-on foam insulation (SOFI) was painted white. Subsequent missions have featured an unpainted tank thus exposing the orange/rust colored foam insulation. This resulted in a weight saving of over 1,000 lb (450 kg), a savings that translated directly to added payload capacity to orbit. NASA's Space Shuttle, officially called Space Transportation System (STS), is the United States government's sole manned launch vehicle currently in service. The winged shuttle orbiter is launched vertically, carrying usually five to seven astronauts and up to about 22,700 kg (50,000 lbs) of payload into low earth orbit. When its mission is complete, it reenters the earth's atmosphere and makes an unpowered gliding horizontal landing, usually on a runway at Kennedy Space Center. The Space Shuttle orbiter was manufactured by North American Rockwell, now part of the Boeing Company. Martin Marietta (now part of Lockheed Martin) designed the external fuel tank and Morton Thiokol (now part of Alliant Techsystems (ATK)) designed the solid rocket boosters. The Shuttle is the first orbital spacecraft designed for partial reusability. It carries large payloads to various orbits, provides crew rotation for the International Space Station (ISS), and performs servicing missions. While the vehicle was designed with the capacity to recover satellites and other payloads from orbit and return them to Earth, this capacity has not been used often; it is, however, an important use of the Space Shuttle in the context of the ISS program, as only very small amounts of experimental material, hardware needing to be repaired, and trash can be returned by Soyuz.
  • Solar System Exploration: a Vision for the Next Hundred Years

    Solar System Exploration: a Vision for the Next Hundred Years

    IAC-04-IAA.3.8.1.02 SOLAR SYSTEM EXPLORATION: A VISION FOR THE NEXT HUNDRED YEARS R. L. McNutt, Jr. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, USA [email protected] ABSTRACT The current challenge of space travel is multi-tiered. It includes continuing the robotic assay of the solar system while pressing the human frontier beyond cislunar space, with Mars as an ob- vious destination. The primary challenge is propulsion. For human voyages beyond Mars (and perhaps to Mars), the refinement of nuclear fission as a power source and propulsive means will likely set the limits to optimal deep space propulsion for the foreseeable future. Costs, driven largely by access to space, continue to stall significant advances for both manned and unmanned missions. While there continues to be a hope that commercialization will lead to lower launch costs, the needed technology, initial capital investments, and markets have con- tinued to fail to materialize. Hence, initial development in deep space will likely remain govern- ment sponsored and driven by scientific goals linked to national prestige and perceived security issues. Against this backdrop, we consider linkage of scientific goals, current efforts, expecta- tions, current technical capabilities, and requirements for the detailed exploration of the solar system and consolidation of off-Earth outposts. Over the next century, distances of 50 AU could be reached by human crews but only if resources are brought to bear by international consortia. INTRODUCTION years hence, if that much3, usually – and rightly – that policy goals and technologies "Where there is no vision the people perish.” will change so radically on longer time scales – Proverbs, 29:181 that further extrapolation must be relegated to the realm of science fiction – or fantasy.
  • Resource Utilization and Site Selection for a Self-Sufficient Martian Outpost

    Resource Utilization and Site Selection for a Self-Sufficient Martian Outpost

    NASA/TM-98-206538 Resource Utilization and Site Selection for a Self-Sufficient Martian Outpost G. James, Ph.D. G. Chamitoff, Ph.D. D. Barker, M.S., M.A. April 1998 The NASA STI Program Office... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and the advancement of aeronautics and space technical findings by NASA-sponsored science. The NASA Scientific and Technical contractors and grantees. Information (STI) Program Office plays a key part in helping NASA maintain this important CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected role. papers from scientific and technical confer- ences, symposia, seminars, or other meetings The NASA STI Program Office is operated by sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. Langley Research Center, the lead center for NASA's scientific and technical information. SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program Office provides access technical, or historical information from to the NASA STI Database, the largest NASA programs, projects, and mission, often collection of aeronautical and space science STI concerned with subjects having substantial in the word. The Program Office is also public interest. NASA's institutional mechanism for disseminating the results of its research and • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. development activities. These results are English-language translations of foreign scientific published by NASA in the NASA STI Report and technical material pertinent to NASA's Series, which includes the following report mission. types: Specialized services that complement the STI TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of Program Office's diverse offerings include completed research or a major significant creating custom thesauri, building customized phase of research that present the results of databases, organizing and publishing research NASA programs and include extensive results.., even providing videos.
  • Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences

    Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences

    DUKSUP: A Computer Program for High Thrust Launch Vehicle Trajectory Design & Optimization Spurlock, O.F.I and Williams, C. H.II NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 44135 From the late 1960’s through 1997, the leadership of NASA’s Intermediate and Large class unmanned expendable launch vehicle projects resided at the NASA Lewis (now Glenn) Research Center (LeRC). One of LeRC’s primary responsibilities --- trajectory design and performance analysis --- was accomplished by an internally-developed analytic three dimensional computer program called DUKSUP. Because of its Calculus of Variations-based optimization routine, this code was generally more capable of finding optimal solutions than its contemporaries. A derivation of optimal control using the Calculus of Variations is summarized including transversality, intermediate, and final conditions. The two point boundary value problem is explained. A brief summary of the code’s operation is provided, including iteration via the Newton-Raphson scheme and integration of variational and motion equations via a 4th order Runge-Kutta scheme. Main subroutines are discussed. The history of the LeRC trajectory design efforts in the early 1960’s is explained within the context of supporting the Centaur upper stage program. How the code was constructed based on the operation of the Atlas/Centaur launch vehicle, the limits of the computers of that era, the limits of the computer programming languages, and the missions it supported are discussed. The vehicles DUKSUP supported (Atlas/Centaur, Titan/Centaur, and Shuttle/Centaur) are briefly described. The types of missions, including Earth orbital and interplanetary, are described. The roles of flight constraints and their impact on launch operations are detailed (such as jettisoning hardware on heating, Range Safety, ground station tracking, and elliptical parking orbits).
  • Commercial Orbital Transportation Services

    Commercial Orbital Transportation Services

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
  • Abstract US Patent References

    Abstract US Patent References

    Architecture for Reusable Responsive Exploration Systems: ARES - Platform and Reusable Responsive Architecture for Innovative Space Exploration: PRAISE (Part 1) PATENT PENDING Abstract A comprehensive Modular Reusable Responsive Space Exploration Platform (Architecture) composed of multiple modular reusable elements such that the assemblies can be flexibly configured into systems for low earth orbits launches and for long-range exploration such as orbits to moon, Lagrange points and others. This platform & architecture is named as Architecture for Reusable Responsive Exploration System (acronym ARES) / Platform and Reusable Responsive Architecture for Innovative Space Exploration (acronym PRAISE), in short ARES/PRAISE or simply ARES. It is also known as Alpha Spaces Architecture and Platform (acronym ASAP), in short as “αPlatform” or “αArchitecture”, or “αAres”. As an example, the configuration involves reusable lightweight wing, core stage, (optional booster stages) combination of expendable upper stage and reusable crew capsule. Further, the expendable upper stage can be re-used to serve as in-orbit fuel depots and for other innovative uses. This is first part of the multi part patent application. Inventor: Atreya, Dinesh S. US Patent References US Patent 6158693 - Recoverable booster stage and recovery method US Patent 4878637 - Modular space station US Patent 6726154 - Reusable space access launch vehicle system US Patent 6113032 - Delivering liquid propellant in a reusable booster stage US Patent 4557444 - Aerospace vehicle US Patent 4880187 - Multipurpose modular spacecraft US Patent 4452412 - Space shuttle with rail system and aft thrust structure securing solid rocket boosters to external tank US Patent 4802639 - Horizontal-takeoff transatmospheric launch system US Patent 4884770 - Earth-to-orbit vehicle providing a reusable orbital stage US Patent 4265416 - Orbiter/launch system U.S.