SWITZERLAND LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2019 - SWITZERLAND LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

Document Title LSSIP Year 2019 for Switzerland

Info Centre Reference 20/01/15/41 Date of Edition 29/04/2020 LSSIP Focal Point Thierry Brégou - [email protected] - Skyguide LSSIP Contact Person Marina López Rodríguez [email protected] EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master- Edition 2019 plan-implementation-plan-level-3-2019 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master- Year 2019 plan-implementation-report-level-3-2019 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://www.skybriefing.com/home FAB Performance Plan https://www.fabec.eu/performance/performance-plan

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 Released Issue

APPROVAL SHEET

The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2019 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information. Stakeholder / Name Position Signature Organisation

FOCA Christian HEGNER Director General

Swiss Air Force Maj Gen Bernhard MÜLLER Commander In-Chief

Skyguide Alex BRISTOL Chief Executive Officer

Flughafen Zürich AG Stephan WIDRIG Chief Executive Office

Genève Aéroport André SCHNEIDER Chief Executive Officer

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 Released Issue

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ...... 1 Introduction ...... 6 1. National ATM Environment ...... 7 Geographical Scope ...... 7 National Stakeholders ...... 9 2. Traffic and Capacity ...... 19 Evolution of traffic in Switzerland ...... 19 Geneva ACC ...... 20 Zurich ACC ...... 24 3. Implementation Projects ...... 28 National projects ...... 28 FAB projects ...... 30 Multinational projects ...... 35 4. Cooperation activities ...... 38 FAB Co-ordination...... 38 Multinational cooperation initiatives ...... 39 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ...... 43 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress ...... 43 Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ...... 45 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress ...... 49 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ...... 50 6. Annexes ...... 78 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Switzerland ... 78 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ...... 79 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR KF, ASBU blocks and more ...... 84 D. SESAR Solutions implemented in a voluntary way ...... 89 E. Military Organisations Infrastructure ...... 96 F. Glossary of abbreviations ...... 97

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

Civil Aviation in Switzerland is the responsibility of the Federal Department for the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC). The Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) – Safety Division - Infrastructure is the regulatory body charged by the Swiss Confederation to supervise ATM safety oversight within Swiss airspace. It is also the nominated NSA. The integrated civil-military ANSP, Skyguide, provides services to both OAT and GAT traffic, in Swiss airspace and in adjacent airspace in neighboring countries that has been delegated to its control, from Geneva and Zurich ACCs. Skyguide also provides services at the two national airports (Geneva and Zurich airports), as well as at the regional airports and at primarily military or joint civil-military aerodromes. The Swiss Transportation Safety Investigation Board (STSB) integrated into DETEC carries out technical investigations following accidents and/or incidents. Regulation and Surveillance of Military Aviation in Switzerland is the responsibility of the Military Aviation Authority (MAA) under the direction of the Commander in chief of the Armed Forces Staff, incorporating elements of the Air Force and the military procurement agency. Switzerland is member state of the FABEC together with Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg and The Netherlands. Traffic and Capacity

Traffic in Switzerland increased by 0.8% in 2019 compared to 2018. The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.1% and 2.6% for Switzerland between 2020 and 2024, with a baseline growth of 1.6%. This traffic growth remains uncertain, especially when considering the traffic decrease observed since autumn 2019. In Geneva ACC, the average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.28 minutes per flight in summer 2018 to 0.34 minutes per flight in summer 2019. In Zürich ACC, the average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.54 minutes per flight in summer 2018 to 0.30 minutes per flight in summer 2019. Capacity gaps are expected in both Geneva and Zürich between 2020 and 2024, should the traffic effectively grow.

0.1% +0.8% & 2.6% 2019 2019 2020-2024

Switzerland

0.28 0.34 0.54 0.30 2018 2019 2018 2019 GVA ACC ZRH ACC

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 1 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non-PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2019, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE”.LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP14 (LSGG), AOP14 (LSMD), AOP15 (LSGG), AOP15 (LSZH), AOP16 (LSGG), AOP16 (LSZH), AOP18 (LSGG), AOP18 (LSZH), ATC02.9, ATC18, ATC 19, ATC20, ATC02.9, NAV12 and COM11.2.

Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030

83%

SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2011 2024

44%

SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030

20%

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

Optimised ATM Network Advanced Air Traffic High Performing Airport Enabling the Aviation Services Services Operations Infrastructure

100 96 n/a 0 % % % 80 70 65 64 % % 49 % % % 35 % 22 % 10

PCP) PCP) PCP) PCP) - - - -

SESAR Phase SESAR Phase SESAR Phase SESAR Phase - - - - Pre Pre Pre Pre SESAR 1 (non 1 SESAR (non 1 SESAR (non 1 SESAR (non 1 SESAR SESAR 1 (PCP only) (PCP 1 SESAR only) (PCP 1 SESAR only) (PCP 1 SESAR only) (PCP 1 SESAR

ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress.

Block 0 2000 2024

82%

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 3 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook

State Objectives

Deployed in 2018 - 2019 - 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel  Spacing below FL195 ITY-AGVCS2 - 100 % progress

By 2020 By 2021 By 2022 By 2023+

- New Pan-European - Free Route Airspace - Ground-Based Safety Nets - Ensure Quality of Network Service (NewPENS) AOM21.2 - 25 % progress ATC02.8 - 53 % progress Aeronautical Data and COM12 - 58 % progress - Traffic Complexity Aeronautical Information - Migrate from AFTN to Assessment ITY-ADQ - 22 % progress AMHS FCM06 - 70 % progress - Arrival Management COM10 - 95 % progress - Interactive Rolling NOP Extended to En-route FCM05 - 75 % progress Airspace - Electronic Terrain and ATC15.2 - 49 % progress Obstacle Data (eTOD) - Voice over Internet INF07 - 21 % progress Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal COM11.2 - 10 % progress - RNAV 1 in TMA Operations NAV03.1 - 54 % progress - ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations NAV12 - 57 % progress - RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY NAV10 - 69 % progress - RNP 1 in TMA Operations NAV03.2 - 51 % progress - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route COM11.1 - 32 % progress

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 4 Released Issue Airport Objectives - Geneva Airport

 Deployed in 2018 - 2019 None

By 2020 By 2021 By 2022 By 2023+

- Continuous Descent - Initial Airport Operations - AMAN Tools and Operations (CDO) Plan Procedures ENV01 - 50 % progress AOP11 - 31 % progress ATC07.1 - 08 % progress

Airport Objectives - Zürich Airport

Deployed in 2018 - 2019 - Improve Runway and Airfield Safety  with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP12 - 100 % progress

By 2020 By 2021 By 2022 By 2023+

- Initial Airport Operations - Time-Based Separation Plan AOP10 - 00 % progress AOP11 - 34 % progress - Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing AOP13 - 11 % progress

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 5 Released Issue

Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3)/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2019, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, it gives an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units and the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP.

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It also presents the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level.

Chapter 3 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and multinational level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The Level 1 document covers a high-level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in the Level 2 document.

Chapter 4 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation, as well as all other multinational initiatives, which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned.

Chapter 5 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition, it provides the high-level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

The Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders (REG, ASP, MIL and APO) to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2019. In addition, it covers a detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.

The information contained in Chapter 5 – Implementation Objectives Progress is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 6 Released Issue

1. National ATM Environment

Geographical Scope

International Membership

Switzerland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since ECAC  1955 (founding Member State) EUROCONTROL  1st July 1992 (adhesion) European Union  1st June 2002 (Member State without voting right at the Single Sky Committee based on Bilateral Agreement on Air transport) EASA  1st December 2006 (Member State without voting right) ICAO  1947 (founding Member State) NATO Participant in NATO's Partnership for Peace Programme ITU  1865 (founding Member State) JAA  1970 EDA  2012 (Administrative Arrangement enabling participation in projects and programmes)

Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses the Swiss FIR (“FIR SWITZERLAND”). Swiss FIR includes the Principality of Liechtenstein and is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States, namely Austria, Italy, France and Germany.

Recently, Germany and Switzerland agreed to align the FIR boundaries to the political borders in the area of Basel. Moreover, a very small part of the German airspace located north of the Lake of Constance is still incorporated in the FIR Switzerland (since the fifties, basically this has been done for historical reasons).

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 7 Released Issue

Airspace Classification and Organisation

The airspace classification within the Swiss FIR is described in the figure below.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 8 Released Issue ATC Units

The ATC units in the Swiss airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA Geneva 9 3 Swiss, French ER: L6 to L1, INI S, INI N, INIE APP GVA: DEP, APC, FIN Zurich 10 5 Swiss, German ER: M6 to M1, W, N, E, S APP ZRH: APW, APE, DEP, FIN, CAP Regional n/a 3 Swiss APP: DELTA GVA (SIO/EPL), Bern (BRN/GRE), ARFA (SGA)

National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM/ANS in Switzerland are the following: • Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC) including its Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) and Swiss Transportation Safety Investigation Board (STSB); • Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport (DDPS), including the Swiss Air Force (SAF) and the Military Aviation Authority (MAA); • Swiss joint civil-military ANSP (Skyguide) with its training center; • Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology (MeteoSwiss), which is a part of the Federal Department of Home Affairs (FDHA); • Genève Aéroport (Aéroport International de Genève), which is an operator of Geneva airport (GVA); and • Flughafen Zürich AG (FZAG), which is an operator of Zurich airport (ZRH). Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. In addition, Engadin Airport AG provides ANS services (AFIS only) at Samedan airport (LSZS). With Skyguide and MeteoSwiss it forms the group of the three certified Single European Sky service providers in Switzerland.

Federal Council

DDPS DETEC FDHA

MAA STSB MeteoSwiss

SAF FOCA

Skyguide

Figure 1: State diagram

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 9 Released Issue Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

The primary regulatory entity in Switzerland is the Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC). Other national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. EU legislation on aviation is applicable in Switzerland by means of adoption in the framework of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible National Legal Basis Rule-making FOCA SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz” SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst” Safety Oversight FOCA SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz”, Art. 3, Art. 40a Section: Air Navigation SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember Services* 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst” Department: Safety Risk SR Number 748.222.3 „Verordnung des UVEK über die Management Ausweise für bestimmte Personalkategorien der Flugsicherungsdienste“ *with the support of other sections

Enforcement actions in case of FOCA SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz”, Art. 3, Art. 40a, Art. non-compliance with safety Section: Standardisation 91, Art. 91bis, Art. 92 regulatory requirements and Sanctions SR Number 748.132.1 „Verordnung über den Flugsicherungsdienst“ SR Number 748.132.13 „Verordnung über den zivilen Flugwetterdienst“ SR Number 748.222.3 „Verordnung des UVEK über die Ausweise für bestimmte Personalkategorien der Flugsicherungsdienste“ Airspace FOCA SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz”, Art. 3, Art. 8a Section: Airspace* SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst” * after consultation with the Air force according to law SR Number 748.121.11 "Verordnung des UVEK über die Verkehrsregeln für Luftfahrzeuge", Art. 4 Economic DETEC DETEC is the owner of the ANSP on behalf of the State; & FOCA is responsible for regulation and oversight. FOCA Section: Economic Affairs

Environment FOCA SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember Section: Environmental 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst” Affairs

Security FOCA SR Number 748.01 „Verordnung über die Luftfahrt vom Section: Security 14. November 1973“; Art. 122a ff. SR Number 748.122 „Verordnung des UVEK über die Sicherheitsmassnahmen im Luftverkehr vom 20. Juli 2009“ SR Number 748.132.1 “Verordnung vom 18. Dezember 1995 über den Flugsicherungsdienst”

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 10 Released Issue Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible National Legal Basis Accident investigation Swiss Transportation SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz” Art. 22 ff. Safety Investigation SR Number 742.161 „Verordnung vom 17. Dezember Board (STSB) 2014 über die Sicherheitsuntersuchung von Inspectorate (AI) (2) Zwischenfällen im Verkehrswesen“

Occurrence Reporting FOCA SR Number 748.0 “Luftfahrtgesetz”, Art. 20 (Collection, Evaluation & Department: Safety Risk SR Number 748.01 „Verordnung über die Luftfahrt Processing of Data) Management vom 14. November 1973“, Art. 77, 77d und 77e Section: Air Navigation Occurrence Reporting Process FOCA Services

Airprox Analysis Airprox Analysis Board ICAO DOC 7754; Part V.II (ATS – FASID, paragraph 24 (AAB) and attachment D)

Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA)

Civil aviation in Switzerland lies in the competence of the DETEC, which i.a. approves the standard tariff that is included in the calculation of charges for over-flying, entering or leaving the Swiss FIR.

The Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) is the Swiss regulatory authority and is responsible for the certification of civil aircraft and equipment, aerodromes and ANSP and it supervises the safety of aviation in the national airspace. FOCA web site address: http://www.bazl.admin.ch/index.html?lang=en

With the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport, a joint decision body – the Joint Committee – has been established. This Committee decides on the adoption of EU regulations by Switzerland. The Joint Committee meets on a yearly basis, usually in November or December (ordinary procedure). The additional written adoption-procedure can be applied if necessary.

Additionally, FOCA represents Switzerland i.a. in the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council and the Permanent Commission, the Single Sky Committee, the Management Board of EASA, FABEC as well as ICAO and ECAC groups.

Supervision and oversight of air traffic over the complete territory of Switzerland has been delegated by the Swiss Confederation to FOCA and thus it has the responsibility of ensuring the compliance of all applicable regulations.

The national air navigation services safety regulatory and oversight function is separated and independent from the service provision function. FOCA is the Swiss National Supervisory Authority (NSA) and Swiss national Competent Authority (CA).

Annual Report published: N National Civil Aviation Y https://www.bazl.admin.ch/bazl/en/home/policies/aviation-policies/aviation- Master Plan (CAMP): policy-report.html https://www.uvek.admin.ch/uvek/en/home/detec/strategy.html

NOTE 1: National CAMP is referenced in ICAO resolutions below: • A39-23: No Country Left Behind (NCLB) Initiative (Draws the attention of Contracting States requesting technical cooperation and technical assistance to the advantages to be derived from well-defined projects based on civil aviation master plans) • A39-25: Aviation’s contribution towards the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Urges Member States to enhance their air transport systems by effectively implementing SARPs and policies while at the same time including and elevating the priority of the aviation sector into their national development plans supported by robust air transport sector strategic plans and civil aviation master plans, thereby leading to the attainment of the SDGs)

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 11 Released Issue • A39-26: Resource Mobilization (Requests the Secretary General to develop guidance material to assist States in including and elevating the priority of the aviation sector into their national development plans and developing robust air transport sector strategic plans and civil aviation master plans).

FOCA organisation chart is depicted in Annex B.

Skyguide

Services provided

Governance: State-owned public company Ownership: 99.91% State-owned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route Y NIL ATC approach Y International airports: Geneva and Zurich Regional airports: Bern, Buochs, Grenchen, Les Eplatures, Lugano, St Gallen- Altenrhein, Donaueschingen (D) and Friedrichshafen (D) Primarily military or joint civil-military aerodromes: Alpnach, Dübendorf, Emmen, Locarno, Meiringen, Payerne and Sion ATC aerodrome(s) Y At Geneva and Zurich airport the ATS Services are delivered by Skyguide AMS Services are provided by Genève Aéroport and Flughafen Zürich AG AIS Y NIL CNS Y NIL MET N Provided by MeteoSwiss see below ATCO training Y Training is provided for ATCO as well as for other safety related tasks (FIS, AFIS, ATFCM, SPVR, ATSEP) Others N NIL Additional information: Provision of services in Y Skyguide provides air navigation services over Austrian, French, German, other State(s): Liechtenstein and Italian areas Annual Report published: Y https://www.skyguide.ch/en/events-media-board/publications/

Skyguide organization chart in depicted in Annex B.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 12 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 13 Released Issue

Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology (MeteoSwiss)

The responsibilities of the Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology (MeteoSwiss), the monopoly provider of air navigation meteo services in Switzerland, are as follows:

Name of the ANSP: MeteoSwiss Governance: MeteoSwiss is part of the Ownership: State-owned Federal Department of Home Affairs (FDHA) Services provided Y/N Comment MET Y National provider for weather and climate services in Switzerland. METAR/ TAF Y GAFOR Suisse Y AIRMET/ SIGMET Y SWC Y

Engadin Airport

The responsibilities of Engadin Airport, the air navigation service AFIS provider at Samedan airport (LSZS), are as follows:

Name of the ANSP: Engadin Airport Governance: Public company Ownership: Private Services provided Y/N Comment AFIS Y AFIS only within the local flight information zone (FIZ).

ATC systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 Y Participation to the SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU)

FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Commercial solutions and own development Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Ongoing on a yearly basis Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? FDPS Replacement - Replaced in 2024 in the scope of the Virtual Centre deployment ATC Unit GVA and ZRH ACCs

1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 14 Released Issue

SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Commercial solutions (In particular: RDPS: ARTAS/Comsoft, MSSR: Raytheon) Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Yes Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2021/2022 deployment of WAM (followed by SSR decommissioning) ATC Unit GVA and ZRH ACCs

Airports

General information

Two airports in Switzerland, Zurich (ZRH) and Geneva (GVA), have an international status with an intercontinental network. Aerodromes Bern-Belp (LSZB), Lugano (LSZA), Sion (LSGS) and St. Gallen-Altenrhein (LSZR) have a regional status with a continental network. Since November 1999, the operator of the International Airport of Zurich is a private company, Flughafen Zürich AG. Since January 1994, the operator of the International Airport of Geneva, is an autonomous public institution, Genève Aéroport.

Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2019 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives.

The LSSIP for Switzerland focuses on Zurich and Geneva, two international airports with more than 150 000 air traffic movements per year.

For more information on these airports please check the following websites: • Zurich airport: http://www.flughafen-zuerich.ch/ • Geneva airport: http://www.gva.ch/

The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for these airports. For details please check the following websites • Zurich airport: https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/LSZH • Geneva airport: https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/LSGG

Military Authorities

Regulation and Surveillance of Military Aviation in Switzerland is the responsibility of the Military Aviation Authority (MAA). The MAA is under the direction of the Commander in chief of the Armed Forces Staff, incorporating elements of the Air Force and the military procurement agency. In addition, the MAA represents Swiss military aviation interests, inter alia, at the EUROCONTROL (Provisional) Council, the Single Sky Committee, in the FABEC as well as in the NATO EAPC programme on Partnership for Peace. The organisation chart of the Swiss Air Force is depicted in Annex B. the Military Authorities' roles are detailed below.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 15 Released Issue Regulatory role According to Art. 106 of the Federal Aviation Act (SR 748.0) rules defined by the national law on aviation are only binding to military aviation if the Federal Council explicitly declares so. According to Art. 3 of the Ordinance on the Rules of the Air (SR 748.121.11), the Military Aviation Authority sets up specific rules of the air for military aircraft with the consent of FOCA. Swiss Air Force and Military Aviation Authority provide, inter alia: - Air crew training and licensing for air force personnel; - The national, military operations manual (OM); - SAR-related tasks (search).

Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed N national legal provisions? by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: State Law, and / or Level of such legal provision: None Air Force Regulation Authority signing such legal provision: Federal Government, Authority signing such legal provision: N/A Federal Council (Bundesrat), Minister of Transport, Minister of Defence, Directorate of the Federal Office for Civil Aviation, Chief of Armed Forces, the Commander in Chief of the Air Force or his designated Deputy. These provisions cover: These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination N ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision N Aircrew Training Y Aircrew Licensing Y Additional Information: There is one integrated civil and military (for OAT and GAT traffic) ANSP in Switzerland (Skyguide) overseen by FOCA Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP N National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N Other: National VFR Manual Y Other: National VFR Manual N

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 16 Released Issue Oversight

OAT GAT National oversight body MAA MAA

Service Provision role

OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route Y Skyguide En-Route Skyguide Approach/TMA Y Skyguide Approach/TMA Skyguide Airfield/TWR/GND Y Skyguide Airfield/TWR/GND Skyguide AIS Y Skyguide AIS Skyguide MET Y MeteoSwiss and Air Force MET MeteoSwiss SAR Y Kantonspolizei Zürich (RCC), SAF SAR Kantonspolizei Zürich (RCC), SAF TSA/TRA monitoring Y Skyguide FIS Skyguide and Engadin Airport Other: Other: Additional Information: Additional Information:

Military ANSP providing GAT Y If YES, since: 2001 Duration of the 6 years services SES certified? Last Certificate: (21.12.2018) certification: Extended to 21/12/2012 30.06.2020 Certificate issued by: FOCA If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in Y accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information: One joint civil-military ANSP (Skyguide) provides both GAT and OAT services in Switzerland. The oversight of the GAT services is under the responsibility of FOCA.

User role

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can OAT only N GAT only N Both OAT and GAT Y fly?

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system N Under radar advisory service N

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 17 Released Issue

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF Y CNS exemptions: RVSM N 8.33 N Mode S Y ACAS Y Others:

Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Military in Switzerland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Partly Remark: The improvement of FUA application in Switzerland is in constant discussion between FOCA, Skyguide and SAF. The High Level Airspace Policy Body (HLAPB) is subsequently restructured and effective as of 01.05.2019. FUA Level 1 implemented: Yes. Remark: The HLAPB provides a platform for improving L1 and L2 processes. FUA Level 2 implemented: Yes. Remark: The HLAPB provides a platform for improving L1 and L2 processes. FUA Level 3 implemented: Yes

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 18 Released Issue 2. Traffic and Capacity

Evolution of traffic in Switzerland

Switzerland - Annual IFR Movements

1600000 Switzerland - Distribution (Ref. year 2018)

1400000 International Dep/Arr 40% Domestic 1200000 flights2%

1000000

800000 IFR flights 600000 IFR movements - Actuals IFR movements - Baseline forecast 400000 Overflights IFR movements - High forecast 58%

200000 IFR movements - Low forecast A = Actual 0 2015 A 2016 A 2017 A 2018 A 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F 2025 F F = Forecast

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (Autumn 2019) IFR flights yearly growth 2016 A 2017 A 2018 A 2019 A 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F 2024 F 2025 F H 3.9% 3.0% 2.6% 2.1% 2.3% 1.8% Switzerland B 2.3% 3.8% 5.2% 0.8% 2.3% 1.4% 1.8% 1.4% 1.7% 0.9% L 0.5% -0.4% 0.4% 0.1% 0.5% -0.3% ECAC B 2.8% 4.0% 3.8% 0.9% 2.3% 1.9% 2.2% 1.8% 1.9% 1.4% The actual figures for 2019 are based on EUROCONTROL STATFOR Departures, Arrivals, Internals and Overflights (DAIO) Report for 2019.

2019 Traffic in Switzerland increased by 0.8% in 2019 compared to 2018.

2020-2024

The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 0.1% and 2.6% for Switzerland during the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 1.6%.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 19 Released Issue Geneva ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2015-2024

LSAGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

3000 1.0

0.9 2500 0.8

0.7 2000 0.6

1500 0.5

0.4 IFR Average) flights (Daily 1000 0.3 Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) per Enroute (minutes Delay 0.2 500 0.1

0 0.0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Peak Day Traffic 2154 2173 2313 2354 2402 Summer Traffic 1890 1937 2061 2098 2105 Yearly Traffic 1676 1710 1813 1855 1867 Summer Traffic Forecast 2151 2185 2223 2257 2294 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 2181 2257 2323 2379 2431 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 2115 2110 2117 2117 2114 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.09 0.12 0.31 0.28 0.34 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.06 0.09 0.22 0.17 0.20

Performance summer 2019

Traffic evolution (2019 vs 2018) En-route Delay (min. per flight) Capacity Geneva Traffic Forecast (2019 vs 2018) ACC Reference ACC Actual Traffic All reasons Current Shortest Value Routes Capacity Routes Planned Achieved gap? Year H: 3.3% +0.7% 0.20 0.19 B: 2.7% +8% Summer L: 1.6% +0.3% 0.34 165 (+4%) 160 (+1%) No Summer 2019 performance assessment The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.28 minutes per flight in summer 2018 to 0.34 minutes per flight in summer 2019. 53% of the Summer delays were for the reason Weather, 35% for ATC Capacity, 7% for the reason ATC Staffing, 4% for Airspace Management and 1% for Equipment. Note that according to the Network Delay Sharing mechanism for the eNM/ANSP S19 measures, some delay will be removed from the Geneva ACC figures. The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 160. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 160 and the peak 3-hour demand was 149. Operational actions Achieved Comments ATFCM/ASM Step 2 : CDM procedures for Airspace Request Levels 2 Ongoing and 3 CRYSTAL TWR/APP – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Yes Running in shadow mode since August 2019 LSGG PAGE-1 (electronic strip) No Postponed to spring 2020 Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes Continuous effort CRYSTAL – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Yes Continuous effort New sectorisation No Lower sectors: Postponed to spring 2020 Upper sectors: Postponed to 2022 Cross qualification of ATCOs (Upper/Lower) Yes 5 in 2019 Recruitment as necessary to maintain the required staffing levels Yes 10 ATCOs in training (2 foreign recruits, 8 trainees)

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 20 Released Issue Virtual center Yes Integration of multiple QNH zones into the radar tracking and air situation display systems Maximum configuration: 9 sectors Yes 9 (6 upper sectors + 3 lower sectors)

Planning Period 2019-2024 – summer

The planning focuses on the summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. The measures for each year are the measures that will be implemented before the summer season.

Summer Capacity Plan

2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Free Route Airspace FRA CH

Airspace Management ATFCM/ASM Step 2 : CDM procedures for Airspace Request Levels 2 and 3 Advanced FUA

LSGG PAGE-1 LSGG PAGE-2

(electronic strip) (AMAN)

Airport capacity LSGG iLVP

CRYSTAL TWR/APP – Traffic and complexity prediction tool

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Cooperative Traffic Management CRYSTAL – Traffic and complexity prediction tool

New sector New sectorisation configuration in in the Upper Dynamic the Lower Airspace sectorisation Airspace Airspace

Cross-border airspace restructuring

Procedures

Cross qualification of ATCOs

Staffing (Upper/Lower) Recruitment as necessary to maintain the required staffing levels

Virtual centre Technical CPDLC

Capacity

Significant Events

Max sectors 9 9 10 10 10

Planned Annual Capacity Increase 1% 0% 3% 0% 5%

Reference profile Annual % Increase 4% 1% 2% 2% 2%

Current Routes Profile % Increase 2% 1% 2% 2% 2%

Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference -2.4% -3.6% -2.3% -4.6% -1.7% Profile

Difference Capacity Plan v. Current Routes -0.6% -1.8% -0.6% -2.9% 0.0% Profile

Annual Reference Value (min) 0.28 0.27 0.22 0.17 0.17

Max sectors:

Additional information 4 ATCOs remain to be cross-qualified in 2020, these are still separate licences and are therefore a constraint on rostering.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 21 Released Issue The capacity gained by the above measures might be cancelled out by the decrease in capacity linked to the cost reduction measures (which affect ATCOs, as much as technical and operational support staff).

Trainee classes commenced in 2017. 5 new qualified ATCOs in 2019, 10 ATCO in training during 2019, 6 to 10 trainees per year planned from 2020 onwards + 6 to 8 foreign recruits per year. Nevertheless, the staffing situation is expected to remain tense throughout the entire period.

LSGG capacity enhancing measures:

AMAN would have a positive impact on performance, allowing a decrease in complexity, improved coordination, better planning and especially, a reduced need for regulations other than weather, technical, staffing, etc.

2020 Sector openings

LSAG - UTA Sectors available - Summer 2020 - All days 6

0 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00

The above graph shows an outline of available sector configurations for the most loaded traffic days of summer 2020 in the upper airspace. This graph should be considered as an indication only, given that sector configurations at Geneva ACC are planned for each day of the year, based on the traffic forecast for each specific day provided by NM through DDR2. Therefore, the planned sector configurations are fully flexible from one day to another, but are fully dependent on the DDR2 forecast quality, which is itself based on the information delivered by aircraft operators, hence having a direct impact on operational performance.

The profiles shown in the graph below correspond to the capacity increases shown in the above "Capacity Plan" table, and only reflect ATFM en- route delays that are under Skyguide managerial control (i.e. excluding weather, industrial action, etc.) contrarily to the EU-wide target that includes all regulation causes.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 22 Released Issue

2020-2024 Planning Period Outlook A capacity gap is expected during the planning cycle, given the latest Autumn 2019 STATFOR traffic forecast. The magnitude of the gap could be higher if the shortest routes are systematically flown.

In 2017 and 2018, Geneva ACCs witnessed an unforeseen and steady to high increase in traffic because of the regulations due to lack of staff in Karlsruhe, Reims and MUAC. In 2019, capacity bottlenecks in DSNA, DFS, Austrocontrol or other places had also a tremendous effect on re-routings. It is therefore hard to foresee what the traffic will look like once these ACCs have solved their issues and the eNM/ANSP measures are no longer in place. There might be a real downturn in traffic in Geneva ACC. Maybe a first indication was given last summer, when traffic growth slowed down significantly all over Europe and also in Geneva ACC. In the light of this uncertainty, Skyguide does not find reasonable to heavily invest in order to accommodate a traffic growth that might or might not materialize, especially if Skyguide is to reach the cost-efficiency targets.

The uncertainty as to the traffic growth is furthermore illustrated by the fluctuating STATFOR forecast, which in February 2019 foresaw +3.2% (baseline scenario) for year 2019 for the Swiss FIR, whereas the Autumn 2019 version was revised downwards to +1.7%. The actual growth in the Swiss FIR end of December was +0.8%.

The ongoing recruitment initiatives should allow keeping adequate staffing levels to compensate for the foreseen retirement rate. However, in 2019 Skyguide experienced a considerable number of ATCO departures linked to ATCO mobility initiatives in a very tense job market. If this is persistent in the next years, it could negatively affect current staffing plans.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 23 Released Issue

Zurich ACC Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2015-2024

LSAZACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

3500 1.0

0.9 3000 0.8

2500 0.7

0.6 2000 0.5 1500 0.4 IFR Average) flights (Daily

1000 0.3 Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) per Enroute (minutes Delay 0.2 500 0.1

0 0.0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Peak Day Traffic 2508 2573 2701 2830 2891 Summer Traffic 2249 2309 2425 2592 2559 Yearly Traffic 2004 2039 2132 2264 2255 Summer Traffic Forecast 2616 2659 2711 2755 2794 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 2653 2747 2820 2884 2946 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 2568 2566 2579 2582 2586 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.11 0.10 0.15 0.54 0.30 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.10 0.08 0.12 0.36 0.21

Performance summer 2019

Traffic evolution (2019 vs 2018) En-route Delay (min. per flight) Capacity Zurich Traffic Forecast (2019 vs 2018) ACC Reference ACC Actual Traffic All reasons Current Shortest Value Routes Capacity Routes Planned Achieved gap? Year H: 3.6% No -0.4% 0.21 0.18 B: 3.1% significant Summer L: 1.8% impact -1.3% 0.30 187 (+0%) 188 (+1%) No Summer 2019 performance assessment The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.54 minutes per flight in Summer 2018 to 0.30 minutes per flight in Summer 2019. 57% of the Summer delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 29% for Weather, 12% for ATC Staffing, 2% for special Event and 1% for Equipment. Note that according to the Network Delay Sharing mechanism for the eNM/ANSP S19 measures, some delay will be removed from the LSAZ figures. The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 188. During the period June/July, the peak 1 hour demand was 189, and the peak 3-hour demand was 179. Operational actions Achieved Comments FABEC ATFCM/ASM Step 2 : CDM procedures for Airspace Request Ongoing Levels 2 and 3 LSZH ARSI Yes Step 2 Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes Continuous effort CRYSTAL – Traffic and complexity prediction tool ACC: Continuous effort. TWR/APP: in shadow mode since Yes August 2019 Recruitment as necessary to maintain the required staffing levels Yes 18 ATCOs in training (5 foreign recruits, 13 trainees) Virtual centre Yes Integration of multiple QNH zones into the radar tracking and air situation display systems

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 24 Released Issue CAPAN 2017 follow-up, adaptation of EC/h capacities Yes Maximum configuration: 10 sectors Yes 10 sectors opened (4 lower + 6 upper) Remedial measures Achieved Comments Adaptation of the ATCO recruitment levels Yes Reinforced training plan in line with recruitment policy Continuous monitoring of the traffic evolution Yes Daily roster based on DDR2/STATFOR forecast FABEC airspace restructuring project Ongoing

Planning Period 2019-2024 – summer

Summer Capacity Plan

2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Free Route Airspace FRA CH

Airspace Management FABEC ATFCM/ASM Step 2 : CDM procedures for Airspace Request Levels 2 and 3 Advanced FUA

LSZH ARSI (Step 3) LORD / RECAT EU LSZH BR2014/17 Airport capacity CRYSTAL TWR/APP – Traffic and complexity prediction tool

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Cooperative Traffic Management CRYSTAL – Traffic and complexity prediction tool

Dynamic sectorisation Airspace

Cross-border airspace restructuring

Procedures

Staffing Recruitment as necessary to maintain the required staffing levels

Virtual Centre Technical CPDLC

Capacity

Significant Events

Max sectors 10 10 10 10 10

Planned Annual Capacity Increase 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%

Reference profile Annual % Increase 8% 1% 1% 2% 1%

Current Routes Profile % Increase 1% 1% 2% 2% 1%

Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile -7.4% -8.7% -10% -11.7% -8.8%

Difference Capacity Plan v. Current Routes -0.5% -1.6% -3.6% -5.5% -2.0% Profile

Annual Reference Value (min) 0.27 0.27 0.22 0.17 0.17

The capacity gained by the above measures might be cancelled out by the decrease in capacity linked to the cost reduction measures (which affect ATCOs, as much as technical and operational support staff).

Trainee classes commenced in 2017. 5 new qualified ATCOs in 2019, 18 ATCOs in training during 2019, 8 trainees per year planned from 2020 onwards + 2 foreign recruits per year. Nevertheless, the staffing situation is expected Additional information to remain tense throughout the entire period.

Summer traffic in Zurich ACC decreased in 2019, and a large increase would be necessary to return to the 2018 levels.

LSZH capacity enhancing measures:

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 25 Released Issue - RECAT: optimisation of wake turbulence categorisation. The RECAT studies done for LSZH indicate +1 movement at LDG RWY 14 being achieved at hours of high demand. The RECAT is now planned for 2022+, as it will be combined with LORD (Leading Optimised Runway Delivery) - ARSI (Advanced Runway Safety Improvement), next increment in Q1.2020: + 15 departures per hour in configuration South (arrivals RWY 34, departures RWY 28/32) - BR2014/17 (Betriebsreglement 2014/2017): SID/STAR modifications. Due to the German territory overflight restrictions, capacity increase will possibly be limited to +2 arrivals per hour in configurations East (arrivals RWY 28, departures RWY 32)

2020 Sector openings

LSAZ - Sectors available - Summer 2020 - WD LSAZ - Sectors available - Summer 2020 - WE 12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00

The above graphs show an outline of available sector configurations for a typical weekday and a weekend day for summer 2020. These graphs should be considered as an indication only, given that sector configurations at Zurich ACC are planned for each day of the year, based on the traffic forecast for each specific day provided by NM through DDR2. Therefore, the planned sector configurations are fully flexible from one day to another, but are fully dependent on the DDR2 forecast quality, which is itself based on the information delivered by aircraft operators, hence having a direct impact on operational performance.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 26 Released Issue 2020-2024 Planning Period Outlook A capacity gap is expected for most of the planning cycle, given the latest Autumn 2019 STATFOR traffic forecast. The magnitude of the gap could be higher if the shortest routes are systematically flown.

In 2017 and 2018, Zurich ACC witnessed an unforeseen and high increase in traffic because of the regulations due to lack of staff in Karlsruhe, Reims and MUAC. In 2019, capacity bottlenecks in DSNA, DFS, Austrocontrol or other places had also a tremendous effect on re-routings. It is therefore hard to foresee what the traffic will look like once these ACCs have solved their issues and the eNM/ANSP measures are no longer in place. There might be a real downturn in traffic in Zurich ACCs. Maybe a first indication was given last summer, when traffic growth slowed down significantly all over Europe and decreased in Zurich ACC. In the light of this uncertainty, Skyguide does not find reasonable to heavily invest in order to accommodate a traffic growth that might or might not materialize, especially if Skyguide is to reach the cost-efficiency targets.

The uncertainty as to the traffic growth is furthermore illustrated by the fluctuating STATFOR forecast, which in the February 2019 edition foresaw +3.2% (baseline scenario) for year 2019 for the Swiss FIR, whereas the Autumn 2019 version was revised downwards to +1.7%. The actual growth in the Swiss FIR end of December was +0.8%.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 27 Released Issue 3. Implementation Projects The tables below presents the high-level information about the main projects currently ongoing in Switzerland. The details of each project are available in Chapter 2 of the Level 2 - Detailed Implementation Status document.

National projects

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links: ADQ Implementation FOCA (CH), FZAG - Zurich From 2011 until 2023. Based on an ADQ implementation CONOPS a - Airport (CH), GA - Geneva first project (downstream part only) has been Airport (CH), Skyguide (CH) completed ensuring to update all necessary processes (incl. staff training) within Skyguide AIM to become ADQ compliant. An appropriate Safety Report was provided to NSA for review. The new processes have been implemented with effect of 07.01.19. Further projects for a data driven AIP production, workflow management tool, data collection interface and charting enhancements will follow until 2020. In December 2019, FOCA launched a call for tender for the establishment of the data collection services. The relevant legal changes for the ADQ- and TOD implementation are finalised and should be enforced in 2021.

Skyguide: EAD migration for Minimum Static Data completed based on signed EAD Agreement, full Static Data migration is foreseen. EAD migration for PAMS completed based on signed EAD Agreement.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 28 Released Issue Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links: AMAN.CH Skyguide (CH) Clearance for Realisation 02/2019 - L3: ATC07.1, ATC15.1, ATC15.2 Clearance for Operations LSZH : 02/2020 Clearance for Operations LSGG : 10/2020 Skynet rollout CNS core Skyguide (CH) From January 2017 until December • The concepts have been defined and chosen. - and CNS sites 2022. • The requirements have been collected and agreed among concerned stakeholders. • A Network Architecture and a High-level Design have been finalized at network level. • A rollout project, funded by network investments (5yFP), started in 1Q2018, including migration of all services and decommissioning of old 2Mbps leased lines This technology, proven reliable and successful, rely on the experience gained with the Datacom project (see point above). U-Space Skyguide (CH) 12/2021 On-going L2: AUO-0617 VC Programme Skyguide (CH) From 2011 until 2024 • VCT1 delivered four steps, including Mode-S L3: ATC12.1, ATC17, ITY-AGDL and CPDLC; today GVA and ZRH (Upper and L2: AO-0201-A, CM-0301 Lower Area Control) are operating stripless. RP2 PP: Virtual Center 1 VCT1 started in 2010 and will finish in Q12017 • VCT2 develops harmonized ATM practices above FL 100 and the core Skyguide system, architecture. VCT2 started in Q3 2016 and will end in 2021. • VCT3 is starting in 2020 with the definition of the content and the refinement of overall VC benefits.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 29 Released Issue FAB projects

There are two main FABEC projects ongoing: • XMAN (Extended Arrival Manager) and • FRA (Free Route Airspace)

The tables below detail for each ongoing main FABEC project: • which FABEC ANSPs and military partners are participating; • a description, the scope and objectives; • the schedule and implementation planning; • the status end 2019; • the link to the ATM Master Plan Level 3 (formerly ESSIP), if any and • the expected performance contribution to the SES Key Performance Areas Capacity, Safety, Environment and Cost-Efficiency.

Project Name: Extended Arrival Management Project Code: XMAN Organisation(s) Skeyes (BE), DFS (DE), DSNA (FR), LVNL (NL), MUAC ANSP (MAS), Skyguide (CH) and in direct coordination with NATS. Description/Scope/Objectives

The XMAN project (Cross-Border Arrival Management, also referred to as Extended Arrival Management E-AMAN) aims at improving and optimising arrival management operations for major airports. To achieve this the project develops and implements a harmonised approach to arrival management in the core area of Europe. This is a project at FAB level because it has to rely on cross-centre and cross-border processes and procedures. The implementation of XMAN will improve and optimise arrival management operations for the major five airports/TMAs (Munich, Amsterdam, Paris-CDG, Frankfurt, London-Heathrow) as well as for other selected intermediate airports within FABEC and FAB UK/IRL as defined by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 716/2014 (Zurich, Dusseldorf, Brussels, Berlin, Paris-Orly, Nice, London-Stansted, London-Gatwick, Manchester, Dublin). Additionally, airports outside these two FABs, e.g. Copenhagen and Italian airports, coordinate their plans through this XMAN project. One of the main characteristics of the XMAN project is the extension of the planning horizon of arrival management systems (AMAN) from the local TMA into the airspace of upstream control centres. The final extension of arrival management operations is expected to reach at least 180 NM in line with the PCP or CP1 (under consultation), depending on the operational environment and the needs of the stakeholders. These extended planning horizons will cover almost the entire FABEC airspace and, consequently, most of the FABEC control centres will be affected by extended AMAN operations and some feed several arrival streams for different airports/TMAs simultaneously.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 30 Released Issue Schedule/Implementation planning The XMAN project envisaged three development and implementation steps: Basic – Advanced – Optimized. In December 2018 the project team decided to skip the Optimized Step and to incorporate the envisaged features of the Optimized Step into the Advanced Step. The planning is now as follows: 1. Basic Step - From 2012 to 2024 The Basic Step uses the currently available systems and technologies in order to establish cross-centre arrival management in the airspace controlled by Skeyes, DFS, DSNA, LVNL, MUAC and Skyguide. 2. Advanced Step - From 2013 to 2024 The Advanced Step takes into account validated SESAR results in order to improve the en-route part of cross-centre arrival management in the overall FABEC airspace. This step requires enhanced data exchange between ACC/UAC in order to support a delay sharing strategy. Additional planning information related to departures and airborne flights will be provided by Airport-CDM and Network Management. This step has an impact on all FABEC ACCs. This step will also take into account further validated SESAR results produced under SESAR2020 PJ25 which finished in December 2019 and will optimise the cooperation between arrival management and Airport-CDM, Aircraft Operators and Network Management in order to widely share Arrival Management (AM) information between all partners and to process and to apply Arrival Management information where needed. Status

The FABEC XMAN Basic Step has already been implemented at several ACCs for several airports. The implementation phase of the Basic Step will continue until 2024. The Milestone 4 of the Advanced Step of the XMAN project was reached on 29 March 2019. First prototype of the XMAN Portal (main feature of the Advanced Step of the XMAN project) was developed by MUAC and was used during the SESAR2020 PJ25 Demonstration. Initial implementations at MUAC, Reims UAC and Karlsruhe UAC in SESAR VLD were completed. The implementation phase of the Advanced Step will also continue until 2024. Link to ATM Master Plan Level 3 / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ATM Master Plan Level 3 (formerly ESSIP): ATC07.1, ATC15.1 OI Steps: TS-0102, TS-0305 Other References: PCP: - AF1: Extended AMAN and PBN in high density TMA Deployment Programme DP 2019: - Family 1.1.1: Basic AMAN - Family 1.1.2: AMAN upgrade to include Extended Horizon function

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 31 Released Issue Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Improved average punctuality: small positive effect. Better forecast for sector loads: small positive effect. Reduced controller workload in APP and ACC: no significant effect. Increased controller workload in UAC: effect depending on the number of airports to be serviced. Safety Improved situational awareness: small positive effect. Reduced tactical interventions: small positive effect. Environment Reduction of: (including flight Track miles and holdings: small to medium positive effect; efficiency) Fuel burn: large positive effect; CO2/NOx emissions: large positive effect. Cost-Efficiency Investments at ANSP-level will deliver benefits in financial terms to users (e.g. less fuel burn), but not to ANSPs. Cooperation Activities Collaboration with FAB UK/IRL is included. Collaboration with other surrounding FABs is ongoing.

Project Name: Free Route Airspace Project Code: FRA Organisation(s) Skeyes (BE), DFS (DE), DSNA (FR), LVNL (NL), MUAC ANSP (MAS), Skyguide (CH), Mil. Authority (BE), Mil. Authority (DE), Mil. Authority (FR), Mil. Authority (NL)), Mil. Authority (CH) Description/Scope/Objectives The Free Route Airspace (FRA) Programme aims at developing and implementing a Free Route Airspace FABEC wide. The objective of the FRA implementation is to give users opportunities to improve the horizontal flight efficiency through both plannable direct routes and at a later stage defined volume/s of Free Route Airspace within FABEC airspace. The FRA Programme defines a stepped and gradual implementation approach where FABEC ACCs will develop and implement various iterations of Free Route Airspace.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 32 Released Issue Schedule/Implementation planning The FABEC FRA project was launched in 2011 with the objective of setting up a FABEC Free Route Airspace with Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace (A-FUA) at FL 365 (and lower when and where possible) in a stepped approach by the end of RP2. In 2015, the project has been aligned with the requirements of the Pilot Common Project requirements. This induced an implementation of FABEC Free Route Airspace at FL310+ by 2022. In 2016, the project was organised into two work streams - National and cross-border Direct Routes (DCT) including Long Range Direct Routings; - Free Routing. All Free Route initiatives conducted locally, bilaterally or within a FABEC framework are under the FABEC FRA umbrella. Implementation activities are managed at ACC or national level using local management processes and are monitored at FABEC level. In December 2017 the Project Management Plan version 4.0 has been approved. The project is now further supporting and monitoring the direct routing implementations and full FRA implementations. In the proposed PCP review (also referred to as CP1) the deployment target date has been set as: Initial FRA implementation as from 1 January 2022. National final implementation, including cross-border FRA among neighbouring States and FRA connectivity with TMAs as from 1 January 2025. Status The project work on Direct Routings and Free Route is in a rolling MS4 status with a yearly update of the implementation report and implementation plan. In line with the new final target date of the PCP review/CP1, the FABEC project will continue until 2024. DSNA and Skyguide have already implemented several direct routes and will continue to implement further direct routes in the coming years in preparation of Full FRA. DSNA has reviewed its FRA implementation calendar as follows: Dec 2021: H24 FRA FL195+ North West 1 (LFRR Atlantic part), South West (LFBB) with the current system and Center (a portion of LFFF). Winter 2022- 2023: H24 FRA FL195+ North West 2 (LFRR Central) Winter 2023-2024: H24 FRA FL195+ North West “ (LFRR East and a portion of LFFF beneath) + South East ( LFMM) + North East (Reims and a portion of LFFF beneath)

Skyguide plans H24 FRA FL195+ on 2 December 2021. On the 1st of March 2018, DFS has implemented Full FRA H24 in EDDU North airspace above FL 285 and EDDU East Airspace above FL 315 and Full FRA Night above FL245 in all the DFS airspace. DFS plans H24 FRA FL245+ by December 2021. On 5 December 2019, MUAC has successfully implemented H24 FRA.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 33 Released Issue Link to ATM Master Plan Level 3 / OI Steps (ATM Master Plan Level 2) / Other references ATM Master Plan Level 3 (formerly ESSIP): AOM21.1, AOM21.2 OI Steps: AOM-0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0500, AOM-0501, AOM-0505, AOM-0506, CM-0102-A Other References: PCP: - AF3.1.2, 3.2 & 3.3: Free Route Deployment Programme DP 2018: - Family 3.2.1: Upgrade of ATM systems (NM, ANSPs, AUs) to support Direct Routings (DCTs) and Free Routing Airspace (FRA) - Family 3.2.3: Implement Published Direct Routings (DCTs) - Family 3.2.4: Implement Free Route Airspace Expected Performance Contribution (specific to the participating organisation(s)) Capacity Capacity benefits could be foreseen since reduced average transit times may result in an increase in capacity. Capacity benefits may also be possible if there is proven to be a reduced number of conflicts, fewer redirects, and the resulting impact on controller tools. However, it is also possible that in some cases conflicts may become more complex and other or new choke points may emerge. Hence the overall impact of FRA on sector capacity cannot be determined without RTS simulations. Safety No direct impact but existing problem areas might get more complex and if new choke points appear, they potentially impact safety. Environment FRA allows airspace users to fly more direct trajectories, thus potentially reducing flight distance flown, with consequent savings in fuel and direct and strategic (including flight operating costs. There environmental benefits from savings in CO2-emissions might not be as significant in the core area as in the peripheral areas. efficiency) Cost-Efficiency Investments at ANSP-level will deliver benefits in financial terms to users (e.g. less fuel burn), but not to ANSPs. Cooperation Activities -

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 34 Released Issue Multinational projects

Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links: COFLIGHT/eFDP (Flight Skyguide (CH) Coflight V2R1FAT has been delivered and Skyguide's participation to the Coflight Program has - Data Processing) validated in March 2015 as planned. This is changed in 2014 according to the new strategy considered as the first complete and usable based on the Virtual Center concept which enables deliverable out of the Coflight project. the sourcing of services. The next major release following this Hence, the study 'Coflight as a service' was launched version, the V3+, has been delivered in in December 2014, in the framework of a 2016. cooperation agreement between DSNA, ENAV, Under a new framework, the owners of Skyguide and MATS, the first two being potential Coflight (DSNA & ENAV) plan a yearly new future eFDP providers and the latter potential eFDP release, on which eFDP, hence Coflight customers. The study ended successfully at the end Cloud Services (CCS) will be based. of 2016, with a large range of technical, operational, The deployment of CCS should be made on safety, security, interoperability and legal dedicated platforms independently of the deliverables. On top of that, trials based on the operational deployment of Coflight in SESAR B04.04 results and going beyond them in France or Italy. However, it shall go along terms of functionalities were successfully realised. the deployment in a French center for which currently, a V3R3 version is foreseen These developments are in parallel to, but (for December 2018) to serve a basis for the coordinated with, SESAR2020 (in particular the work operational usage inside the 4Flight on PJ19). programme. Initial CCS capability, with the so-called Whilst the technical integration service is made "technical integration service", allowing available in 2020, further services will be deployed customers to adapt their own technical over time, until 2024, by when the full set of services ATM environment, will be made available will be available : by Q2 2020 based on Coflight version - technical integration service v3.3.5c. - training service - validation service - operational service - continuity service.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 35 Released Issue Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links: International MPLS DFS (DE), DSNA (FR), Initiation: • International telecom carrier-Ethernet - communication network Skyguide (CH) 3Q 2017 services, as well as network elements have been interconnections; SPInet ordered by all three parties (Skyguide and Partners Implementation: International Network) from 4Q 2017 until 4Q 2019. • Design has been finalized and the deployment started in January 2018 at DFS and Skyguide and in April 2019 at DSNA.

Fully operational from 4Q 2018 between DFS and Skyguide.

First links are operational since 4Q 2019 between DSNA and Skyguide. SETInet IP International IP Austrocontrol (AT), Initiation: • FABEC is interconnected by means of IP - communications ENAV (IT), FABEC (CH), 1Q 2009 routing over SETINET & MONIQUE (TDM networks). interconnections FABIEN Skyguide (CH) This interconnection network is named FABIEN (FABEC Interconnection of Implementation: (FABEC IP Interconnection Network). Existing IP Networks) from 1Q 2010 until 1Q 2015. • Italy and Austria are interconnected by means of IP routing over SETINET. This service is Decommissioning: named SETINET IP. Planned in 2020-21, once FMTP services are Others European centralized (or meshed) services, successfully migrated over newPENS such as NMOC (formerly CFMU, since 2012), EAD (since 2Q2013) and AMHS (since 2Q2014) are connected by means of PENS. XMAN uses the PENS ANSP BB VPN from mid-2017

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 36 Released Issue Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Links: SETInet International TDM Austrocontrol (AT), DFS TDM Initiation: Achieved with DFS, ENAV, DSNA and - communications (DE), DSNA (FR), ENAIRE 1Q 2008 AUSTROCONTROL (via DFS). SETINET is connected to interconnections (ES), ENAV (IT), Skyguide TDM Implementation: MONIQUE (DFS & Benelux) since 2005. (CH) from 4Q 2011 until 4Q 2015 Interconnections between DSNA (Bordeaux) and IP/MPLS Initiation/Trials: ENAIRE (Madrid-Barcelona) deployed and 1Q 2016 operational since December 2015. IP/MPLS Implementation: Decommissioning of international 2 Mbps leased from 1Q 2017 until 4Q 2020 lines by telecom operators will need a migration over IP/MPLS and/or Ethernet. The latter might be Mandate cancellation: SETINET and the as well driven by the phase-out of TDM products by related interconnection agreements have equipment manufacturers. Therefore, the approach been canceled by end of 2020. will be a technological transition on a bilateral and case-by-case basis, as the IP/MPLS pilot (between DSNA and Skyguide) has been proven reliable and safe.

Mandate cancellation letters have been formally sent to DSNA and ENAV.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 37 Released Issue 4. Cooperation activities

FAB Co-ordination

FAB Europe Central (FABEC) consists of the following states: Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The FABEC Feasibility Phase (2006-2008) led to the conclusion that FABEC is feasible. The Implementation Phase (2008-2013) demonstrated that the FABEC structure was compliant with SES regulations. After the ratification of the FABEC Treaty by all FABEC States, FABEC formally entered into force on the 1st of June 2013. FABEC intends to provide capacity, solve bottlenecks, reduce costs and emissions, make flying more efficient and ensure military mission effectiveness, while maintaining the high safety standards that exist over Europe.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 38 Released Issue Multinational cooperation initiatives

Name Partners Planning Status Cooperation Skyguide AIM (CH) Skyguide AIM Operational and strategic work packages are considered as The cooperation is based on a signed data publication process - DSNA/SIA (F) services DSNA/SIA appropriate for strengthening the collaboration of the two agreement between Skyguide AIM services and DSNA/SIA. partners. The first agreement was signed in 2010. The AIM cooperation is managed by a joint steering group (Comité In line with FABEC goals, aeronautical data and process de Pilotage) agreeing the common work packages and setting the harmonisation issues are continuously being addressed and priorities. resolved within a new signed formal agreement (including A formal harmonised workflow for cross-border publications is elements such as Mandatory Information Area (MIA) and successfully being applied in support of ATM. The experience gained EAD upload cross-border responsibilities). is shared with the appropriate FABEC AIM expert teams. A revised set of annexes to the updated AIM agreement, including Many airspace cross-border issues in the Basle region are FABEC concepts as Mandatory Information Area (MIA), was studied, and appropriate solutions are foreseen in the approved in July 2017. course of 2020. A process harmonisation referring to geographical coordinates resolution is ongoing. Cooperation Skyguide AIM (CH) Skyguide AIM A formal AIM agreement is planned and will include The establishment of a formal AIM agreement between ACG and - Austrocontrol (A) services ACG AIM elements such as the operational geographical borderline, Skyguide AIM services is in progress. Agreement on an enhanced early coordination of IFR navigation data and EAD upload operational geographical borderline for EAD is reached (formal cross-border responsibilities. agreement is in elaboration). A data exchange comparison study and a meeting held at the beginning of 2020 pave the way for the signing of an agreement. Cooperation Skyguide AIM (CH) Skyguide AIM Utilise the RAIM service based on the formal agreement Currently, Skyguide gets RAIM predictions on the existing DFS RAIM – DFS (D) services DFS signed with DFS in March 2011 (publication of RAIM prediction tool for the following aerodromes: LSZH, LSZR LSGC, NOTAM to support RNAV (GNSS) approaches in LSZB, LSZG, LSME, LSMD, LSMP, LSGG, LSGS and LSZS. Switzerland). A formal AIM agreement was signed in December 2017 and In line with FABEC goals, aeronautical data and process includes elements such as the Mandatory Information Area (MIA) harmonisation issues are continuously being addressed and and EAD upload cross-border responsibilities. resolved within a new signed formal agreement (including In 2019, an enhanced operational geographical borderline is elements such as Mandatory Information Area (MIA) and efficiently implemented in EAD to solve accuracy and legal issues EAD upload cross-border responsibilities). regarding obstacles close to the borderline.

Cooperation Skyguide AIM (CH) Skyguide AIM A formal AIM agreement is planned and will include A formal AIM agreement between ENAV and Skyguide AIM services – ENAV (I) services ENAV elements such as early coordination of IFR navigation data has been signed in December 2019. and EAD upload cross-border responsibilities. AIM

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 39 Released Issue

Name Partners Planning Status Auditing Cooperation Skyguide An annual audit program 2019 was established; various Due to organisational changes and limited resources, audit activities audit activities were planned where partner organisations have been conducted between Skyguide and DFS in 2019. (Framework for FABEC) DFS were invited to participate. Either as auditor or observer.

DSNA New: Skeyes ANA Luxembourg MUAC FCS Skyguide (through Skynav) Continuation of collaboration Collaboration actively pursued. Proof of compliance of calibration of our installations with ICAO Flight Calibration Services DFS regulations Austrocontrol ESSP Skyguide The ESSP has declared the start of the EGNOS Safety-of-Life Contract signed with the European Commission entitling the ESSP- Service (SoL Service) as of 2 March 2011 following EC SAS to become the EGNOS system operator and EGNOS Safety of European Satellite Services DFS Provider authorization to provide the service. Life (SoL) service provider. DSNA The service contract (ESP) was attributed to the ESSP following a Call for Tender in 2013. It entered into force the 01.01.2014 for a ENAIRE duration of 8 years. ESSP certificated as a navigation service provider by EASA was NATS renewed in 2018 for two more years ENAV Due to changes in EU regulation, the competent NSA is the EASA (for this pan-European service). NAV Portugal A first landing approach using EGNOS was performed end of 2016

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 40 Released Issue Name Partners Planning Status SESAR JU European Union Final Grant Agreement reached in Q4/2016 Skyguide is member of the SESAR Joint Undertaking and involved in (European Projects are conducted in two waves. Wave 1 started end following SESAR2020 Projects (PJs): Commission), of 2016 and was terminated end of 2019. Wave 2 started Wave 1 : beginning of 2020and continue until end of 2021. • Eurocontrol, PJ02: Increased Runway and Airport Throughput • Airbus, AT-One PJ06: Trajectory Based Free Routing consortium, B4- • PJ09: Advanced Demand & Capacity Balancing consortium, • PJ10: Separation Management En-Route and TMA COOPANS, • PJ15: Common Services Dassault Aviation, • PJ16: Controller Working Position / Human Machine Interface DFS, DSNA, • PJ18 : 4D Trajectory Management ENAIRE, ENAV, • Leonardo, PJ19 : Content Integration • Frequentis, PJ20 : Master Plan Maintenance Honeywell, • PJ25 : Cross Border SESAR Trial for Enhanced Arrival Management INDRA, NATMIG; Wave 2 : NATS, SEAC, • PJ07: Collaborative Framework Managing delay Skyguide, Thales constraints on arrival LAS France SAS, • PJ09: Dynamic Airspace Configuration Thales Avionics • PJ10: Flight Centred ATC and Improved Distribution of SAS Separation Responsibility in ATC; Delegation of Airspace amongst ATSUs; HMI Interaction modes for ATC Centers • PJ18: Improved Ground Trajectory Predictions enabling future automation tools; Improved Vertical Profiles through enhanced vertical clearances • PJ19: Content Integration, Performance, Management and Business Case Development • PJ20: Master Planning • VLD3 Improving Runway Throughput in one airport

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 41 Released Issue A6 Alliance

The “A6 Alliance” was set up informally in 2007 between the ANSPs interested in accession to SJU membership.

After the successful cooperation for accession to SJU membership, it was decided to formalize the A6 Alliance through a Memorandum of Cooperation which was concluded in June 2011. The aim of the cooperation and coordination between the 6 parties was to provide customer value through improving the ATM performance at a European Network Level and increasing the pace of delivering the Single European Sky. The main areas of cooperation relate to general fields of mutual interest (e.g. best practice, harmonized strategy etc.), the SESAR R&D phase and SESAR deployment phase. The governance of the A6 Alliance is ensured by a Steering Board composed of CEOs which meets on a quarterly basis and is supported by a Strategy Board composed of senior managers. An R&D Working Group and a Deployment Working Group organize co-operation at expert level. The A6 Alliance quickly became an important player and a key stakeholder of the Single European Sky and has made significant and remarkable contributions to the SESAR JU, for example on the occasion of the ATM Master Plan Updates (editions 2012, 2015 and 2019). The A6 also contributed to the establishment of the Airspace Architecture Study in 2019. PANSA became then a full member of the A6 Alliance, which also developed a close partnership with the COOPANS3 ANSPs, and a strong relationship with the A4 (Airlines) and the SDAG (airports) which has resulted in the setup of an industry led consortium (SESAR Deployment Alliance (SDA)). On December 5th 2014, the European Commission tasked the SDA with the setup of the SESAR Deployment Manager, thus strengthening its legitimacy in actively contributing to SESAR deployment. This partnership between ANSPs led to the formal integration of COOPANS into the A6 Alliance for SESAR Deployment Manager activities in 2015 and, strengthened by its wide membership, the A6 Alliance members has been able since then to provide significant support either in logistics or in human resources to the SESAR Deployment Manager. The A6 Alliance leads European-wide technical activities validated and co-funded by the EC for their consistency with the SES framework. Through the EC Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) financial program, successive proposals and actions driven by the SESAR Deployment Manager allowed significant contributions to ATM industry implementation projects within SESAR Common Projects deployment priority (currently only Pilot Common Project – PCP). The SDA and its members also is one of the coordinating entities proposing the establishment of the SES Digital Backbone (SDB) to allow the Single European Sky to transition towards a Digital European Sky. Moreover, in the context of SESAR2020, the B44 Consortium joined the A6 Alliance in 2015 and, after having been associated through an agreement established with A6 Alliance in order to authorize exchanges between their experts in the domain of R&D, Skyguide became by the end 2017 a consortium member with DSNA of A6 through an ad-hoc consortium agreement with DSNA. Finally, the A6, associated for the purpose to ROMATSA (Romanian ANSP) and HungaroControl (Hungarian ANSP) and in cooperation with its A4 and SDAG partners, prepared in 2017 the establishment of SDA consortium into an AISBL5 that became effective on 01/01/2018, for the benefit of the whole ATM industry and their end customers.

3 ACG, Croatia Control, IAA, LFV and Naviair together form the COOPANS Alliance Innovative Network 4 PANSA, ANS CR, LPS SR and Oro Navigacija together form the B4 Consortium 5 “Association Internationale Sans But Lucratif », under Belgian law

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 42 Released Issue 5. Implementation Objectives Progress

State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress

Completed Ongoing 5; 10%

7; 14% Planned Late 22; 45%

1; 2%

Not Yet Planned Not Applicable

14; 29% Missing Data Undefined

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 43 Released Issue The implementation of the ATM Master Plan Level 3 (ATM MP L3) objectives is progressing on schedule in Switzerland. Most of the objectives are completed, ongoing or planned.

Out of the 49 ATM MP L3 active objectives applicable to Switzerland, 22 are 'completed', 14 are 'ongoing' and one is 'planned'.

The seven objectives that are 'late' are:

• AOP13 Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing (LSZH), • ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets, • ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures (LSGG), • COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS, • COM11.1 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), • INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) and • ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information.

The five objectives that are 'not planned yet' are:

• AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data, • AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing, • AOM19.4 Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations, • FCM08 Extended Flight Plan and • INF08.1 Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 44 Released Issue

Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature

The Implementation objectives progress charts per Key Feature below show progress only for Implementation Objectives applicable to the State/Airport and which are not local objectives. Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C: Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR, ICAO and DP.

Legend:

 ## % = Expected completion / % Progress

= Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF)  100% = Objective completed = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline

Optimised ATM Network Services

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 >26

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and 100 %

General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling 

AOM19.1 ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA 100 %

(AFUA) 

AOM19.2 ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data 0 %

AOM19.3 Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM 0 %

Information Sharing

AOM19.4 Management of Pre-defined Airspace 0 %

Configurations

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow 87 %

management services

FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 100 %

FCM04.2 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 100 %

2 

FCM05 Interactive Rolling NOP 75 %



FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment 70 %



LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 45 Released Issue Advanced Air Traffic Services

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 >26

AOM21.1 Direct Routing 100 %



AOM21.2 Free Route Airspace 25 %



ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short 100 %

Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en- 

route operations

ATC02.8 Ground-Based Safety Nets 53 %



ATC02.9 Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs 100 %



ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures

LSGG - Geneva Airport  8 %

LSZH - Zürich Airport

ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, 100 %

Resolution Support Information and 

Conformance Monitoring

ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En-route in 100 %

Support of AMAN 

ATC15.2 Arrival Management Extended to En-route 49 %

Airspace 

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II 0 %

change 7.1 

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance 100 %

to Controller during Coordination and 

Transfer

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO)

LSGG - Geneva Airport  50 %

LSZH - Zürich Airport  100 %

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated 100 %

co-ordination processes 

NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 54

 %

NAV03.2 RNP 1 in TMA Operations 51 %



NAV10 RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY 69 %



NAV12 ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations 57

 %

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 46 Released Issue High Performing Airport Operations

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 >26

AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and

Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1)

LSGG - Geneva Airport  100 %

LSZH - Zürich Airport  100 %

AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and

Control System (A-SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2)

LSGG - Geneva Airport  100 %

LSZH - Zürich Airport  100 %

AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-

CDM)

LSGG - Geneva Airport  100 %

LSZH - Zürich Airport  100 %

AOP10 Time-Based Separation

LSZH - Zürich Airport  0 %

AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan

LSGG - Geneva Airport  31 %

LSZH - Zürich Airport  34 %

AOP12 Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with

Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC)

LSZH - Zürich Airport  100 %

AOP13 Automated Assistance to Controller for

Surface Movement Planning and Routing

LSZH - Zürich Airport 11 % 

SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing 100 %

Runway Excursions



LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 47 Released Issue Enabling Aviation Infrastructure

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 >26

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 95 %



COM11.1 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En- 32 %

Route 

COM11.2 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in 10 %

Airport/Terminal 

COM12 New Pan-European Network Service 58 %

(NewPENS) 

FCM08 Extended Flight Plan 0 %

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 21 %



INF08.1 Information Exchanges using the SWIM 0 %

Yellow TI Profile

ITY-ACID Aircraft Identification 100 %



ITY-ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and 22 %

Aeronautical Information 

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services 100 %



ITY- 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing 100 %

AGVCS2 below FL195 

ITY-FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100 %

(FMTP) 

ITY-SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 100 %



LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 48 Released Issue ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress

The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2019 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by the ICAO EUR EASPG/1 meeting (European Aviation System Planning Group).

Legend:

= Completed (during 2019 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2019 = Not applicable

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 >26

B0-ACAS ACAS Improvements

B0-ACDM Improved Airport Operations through Airport- 100 %

CDM

B0-APTA Improved Airport Accessibility 100 %

69.0 % B0-ASUR Improved access to Optimum Flight Levels 100 %

through Climb/Descent Procedures using ADS-B

B0-CCO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in 100 %

Departure Profiles 0.0 % B0-CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent 100 %

Profiles (CDOs) 75.0 % B0-DATM Service Improvement through Digital 100 %

Aeronautical Information Management 22.0 % B0-FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and 100 %

Capacity through Ground-Ground Integration

B0-FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En- 100 %

Route Trajectories.

B0-NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning 100 %

based on a Network-Wide view

B0-RSEQ Improved Runway Traffic Flow through 100 %

Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) 77.0 % B0-SNET Ground based safety nets 100 %

84.33 % B0-SURF Improved Runway Safety (A-SMGCS Level 1-2 100 %

and Cockpit Moving Map)

B0-TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the 100 %

initial application of Data Link En-Route

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 49 Released Issue Detailed Objectives Implementation progress

Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: Completed Not yet planned Ongoing Not Applicable Planned Missing Data Late

Main Objectives

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling AOM13.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - Harmonization of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling is 01/04/2012 completed REG (By:12/2018) Approved OAT procedures are in place within the Completed FOCA national ATM Manual as well as in the operation manual - 100% 31/12/2011 of the air force Approved OAT procedures are in place within the Completed REMIL national ATM Manual as well as in the operation manual - 100% 31/12/2011 of the air force. ASP (By:12/2018) Swiss Air Completed - - 100% Force - Completed Skyguide OAT interface exists with France, Germany and Austria. - 100% 01/04/2012 MIL (By:12/2018) Completed REMIL - - 100% - Swiss Air Completed - - 100% Force - ASP actions by integrated civil-military provider Completed FOCA - 100% Skyguide - see corresponding ASP SLoA -

ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: AOM19.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Links: B1-FRTO, B1-NOPS | Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - LARA tool is in place and the B2B SW Release 3.0 is implemented 31/12/2016 ASP (By:12/2018) Completed Skyguide - - 100% 31/12/2016

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 50 Released Issue

ASM Management of Real-Time Airspace Data Timescales: Not yet AOM19.2 0% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 planned Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B1-FRTO, B1-NOPS | Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - A study was conducted to identify system changes. This study should lead to the launch of an - implementation project ASP (By:12/2021) The suitability of LARA tool is evaluated in the Swiss CIV Not yet and MIL environment. A pilot project has been planned conducted between 2017 and 2019. Based on the final Skyguide - 0% pilot project report, a new CIV/MIL project should be - started to cover the whole ASM process (more than it was covered in the pilot project).

Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Not yet AOM19.3 0% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 planned Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B0-FRTO, B1-FRTO, B1-NOPS, B2-NOPS | Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - A study was conducted to identify system changes. Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM - Information Sharing may be late ASP (By:12/2021) Not yet The current pilot project CIV/MIL common database Skyguide - 0% planned does not (yet) include a full rolling ASM/ATFCM process. -

Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations Timescales: Not yet AOM19.4 0% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 planned Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B1-FRTO, B1-NOPS | Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - Management of Pre-defined Airspace Configurations is not yet planned and may be late - ASP (By:12/2021) This objective shall be incorporated into the common Not yet Skyguide project CIV+MIL ASM Tool (LARA). Additionally HLAPB - 0% planned shall define the ASM/ATFCM Switzerland process. -

Free Route Airspace Timescales: AOM21.2 25% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B0-FRTO, B1-FRTO | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - The on-going FRA Switzerland project aims to implement FRA in the Swiss Area of 02/12/2021 Responsibility on 02.12.2021 ASP (By:12/2021) The SESAR PJ06 validation exercises conducted in 2019 Ongoing Free Route Skyguide have validated the FRA design that will be implemented 25% Airspace 02/12/2021 in Switzerland

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 51 Released Issue

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 Links: B0-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport A-SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Geneva Airport. 30/06/2004 REG (By:12/2010) Eurocontrol A-SMGCS Level 1 Requirements directly Completed applicable according to Article 3 of the Federal FOCA Ordinance on Air Navigation Services (letter - no - 100% - objection to implementation - of A-SMGCS Level 1 in 2004). ASP (By:12/2011) Completed Skyguide All Skyguide actions are completed - 100% - APO (By:12/2010) GA - Geneva Completed A-SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Geneva airport. - 100% Airport 30/06/2004

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) AOP04.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 Links: B0-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport A-SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Zurich Airport. 01/05/2010 REG (By:12/2010) Eurocontrol A-SMGCS Level 1 Requirements directly Completed applicable according to Article 3 of the Federal FOCA Ordinance on Air Navigation Services (letter - no - 100% - objection to implementation - of A-SMGCS Level 1 in 2004). ASP (By:12/2011) Completed Skyguide All actions by Skyguide are completed - 100% 01/05/2010 APO (By:12/2010) FZAG - Completed Zurich A-SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Zurich Airport. - 100% 31/12/2009 Airport

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 52 Released Issue

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A- SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 100% Completed Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Links: B0-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport A-SMGCS Level 2 is operational at Geneva airport 31/12/2009 ASP (By:12/2017) Completed Skyguide All actions by Skyguide are completed - 100% 31/12/2009 APO (By:12/2017) GA - Geneva Completed A-SMGCS Level 2 is operational at Geneva airport - 100% Airport 31/12/2009

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A- SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) AOP04.2 100% Completed Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Links: B0-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport A-SMGCS Level 2 is operational at Zurich airport 31/05/2010 ASP (By:12/2017) Completed Skyguide All actions by Skyguide are completed - 100% 31/05/2010 APO (By:12/2017) FZAG - Completed Zurich A-SMGCS Level 2 is operational at Zurich airport - 100% 31/05/2010 Airport

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Timescales: AOP05 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Links: B0-ACDM, B0-RSEQ | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport - 31/03/2016 ASP (By:12/2016) The GA-Skyguide project 'A-CDM' is on-going and is Completed Skyguide planned to be completed by 31/03/2016. Skyguide - 100% - actions are completed. APO (By:12/2016) GA - Geneva Completed - - 100% Airport 31/03/2016

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 53 Released Issue

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Timescales: AOP05 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Links: B0-ACDM, B0-RSEQ | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport Zurich Airport: Airport CDM Applications Level 1 to 3 implemented and audited by 30/09/2013 EUROCONTROL CDM-Team. ASP (By:12/2016) Completed Skyguide The A-CDM project in Zurich is completed - 100% 31/05/2013 APO (By:12/2016) FZAG - Completed Zurich Airport: Airport CDM Applications Level 1,2 and 3 Zurich - 100% implemented. 30/09/2013 Airport

Time-Based Separation Timescales: AOP10 0% Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Links: B1-RSEQ, B2-WAKE | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport

The PCP is being reviewed and Skyguide requested that Zürich is removed from the 31/03/2023 applicability area. However, an implementation project (LORD) has been launched for 2023 REG (By:12/2023) Not yet TBS operations procedures will be published when FOCA - 0% planned defined. - ASP (By:12/2023) A project will be launched (LORD) for completion in Planned Skyguide - 0% 2023 31/03/2023

Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: AOP11 31% Ongoing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B1-ACDM | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport Capacity information are made available by Skyguide for future processing by Geneva Airport 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) Occupancy tool CRYSTAL sends all information about Completed traffic volume, sector capacities, restrictions or decrease of capacity via B2B services to ECTL NMOC in real time. Skyguide - 100% The CRYSTAL TWR / APP tool project is on-going and will - provide traffic and complexity predictions to the FMP and ACC supervisor by 03/2020 APO (By:12/2021) A task force is created to come with a creation and Ongoing implementation plan in order to be fully operational GA - Geneva latest 2021. - 25% Airport 31/12/2021 Through CDM, CEM, and other projects, stakeholders in Geneva already cooperate.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 54 Released Issue

Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: AOP11 34% Ongoing Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B1-ACDM | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport Capacity information are made available and A-CDM processes partly answer the requirements. The CRYSTAL TWR / APP tool project is on-going and will provide traffic and complexity predictions to the FMP and ACC supervisor by 2020. 31/12/2021

Proposal: Project is launched where missing AOP data elements are being identified. All AOP data elements will be available on a shared online platform. ASP (By:12/2021) Occupancy tool CRYSTAL sends all information about Ongoing Skyguide traffic volume, sector capacities, restrictions or decrease - 100% 31/12/2015 of capacity via B2B services to ECTL NMOC in real time. APO (By:12/2021) FZAG - Ongoing Zurich - - 12% 31/12/2021 Airport

Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) AOP12 100% Completed Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 Links: B2-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport Functionality implemented for the Runway part through the Advanced Runway Safety 28/02/2019 Improvement (ARSI) project ASP (By:12/2020) FZAG - Completed Zurich - - 100% 28/02/2019 Airport Completed for the runway part (TWR) with ARSI project Completed deployment To be completed for the airfield part (APRON) with Skyguide - 100% SMAN deployment 28/02/2019

APO (By:12/2020) FZAG - Completed Zurich - - 100% - Airport

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 55 Released Issue

Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing AOP13 Timescales: 11% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Links: B1-ACDM, B1-RSEQ, B2-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport An SMAN implementation project is started. Gathering of system requirements is ongoing. The 31/12/2025 implementation is foreseen after the replacement of the current DMAN. REG (By:12/2023) Late FOCA - - 0% 31/12/2025 ASP (By:12/2023) A programme under the lead of ADP has been launched Late to implement SMAN at BRU, FRA, NCE, ARN, CDG, ORY, Skyguide MAN, DUB, AMS, FCO, MUC and ZRH. - 3% 31/12/2025 The SMAN project in ZRH will formally start in Q4/2022 and the target date for implementation is 2027 FZAG - Late The kick-off took place on 13.11.2015. Zurich - 16% Gathering of requirements is ongoing. 31/12/2024 Airport

Ground-Based Safety Nets Timescales: ATC02.8 53% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Links: B0-SNET, B1-SNET | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - Objective partly completed. The APW functionality will be deployed in 2022 30/06/2022 ASP (By:12/2016) Ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - Late level 2 implementation project is now planned to start in Q3/2020 and finish in Q2/2021. APM is planned to be implemented between Q3/2021 Skyguide - 53% and Q2/2022 30/06/2022 An MSAW-CH functionality improving current local implementation will be deployed between Q3/2021 and Q2/2022

Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: ATC02.9 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 Links: B0-SNET, B1-SNET | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - STCA is in use in Zürich and Geneva TMAs since 1999. 31/12/1999 ASP (By:12/2020) Completed Skyguide - - 100% 31/12/1999

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 56 Released Issue

AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ATC07.1 8% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 Links: B0-RSEQ | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services LSGG - Geneva Airport The deployment project of an AMAN in LSGG operational environment has started in 2019 and 30/06/2022 will finish in 2022 ASP (By:12/2019) An AMAN implementation project is planned to start in Late Skyguide AMAN.CH 8% 2019 and finish in 2022 30/06/2022

AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ATC07.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 Links: B0-RSEQ | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services LSZH - Zürich Airport Completed in ZRH (CALM system) - ASP (By:12/2019) An Arrival management tool is implemented in ZRH Completed Skyguide AMAN.CH 100% (CALM) -

Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring ATC12.1 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B1-FRTO | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - Implementation of Support tools for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring was completed in 2016 through the deployment of the stripless (VC) 30/06/2016 project. ASP (By:12/2021) Skyguide has implemented an automated support for Completed VC Skyguide conflict detection, in both ZRH and GVA ACCs as part of 100% Programme 30/06/2016 its stripless (VC tranche 1) project.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 57 Released Issue

Information Exchange with En-route in Support of AMAN Timescales: ATC15.1 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019 Links: B1-RSEQ | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - 1/ AMAN tools and, exchange mechanisms and corresponding procedures have been established in Switzerland for years. Time To Lose (TTL) information is provided in LSZH operational environment (APP and corresponding upper sectors) 2/ An XMAN implementation project (including an OPS trial) is on-going which will allow an extension of the ER operational coordination with adjacent centers 3/ The deployment of an AMAN in LSGG operational environment is scheduled (AMAN CH 07/06/2017 Project 2018-2020) 4/ The current AMAN in LSZH (CALM) will be replaced (AMAN CH Project 2018-2020) Changes to the existing framework will be treated according to standard oversight procedures (EC REG 1034/2011). With the new AMAN, the XMAN Horizon will be increased to the required 200 NM. 5/ The integration of GVA and Milano is planned to be completed by 2021 ASP (By:12/2019) The introduction of electronic coordination via the Completed AMAN.CH / Stripless system implemented in Zurich ACC and in Extended Geneva ACC allows exchange of basic AMAN data with Skyguide Arrival 100% Swiss airports (Zurich and Geneva (if AMAN equipped) 07/06/2017 Managemen and with airports equipped with AMAN in the vicinity of t Skyguide area of responsibility.

Arrival Management Extended to En-route Airspace Timescales: ATC15.2 49% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Links: B1-RSEQ | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - An AMAN is implemented in Zurich. In the frame of the FABEC activities an XMAN project was launched in 2015. Initial step is to receive XMAN information (Munich) from DFS and integrate them in Zurich 31/12/2023 ACC for operational use by ACC ATCOs. Also with this step, XMAN information is sent to Munich, Langen & Reims for operational use by ACC ATCOs of these adjacent centers. ASP (By:12/2023) An XMAN implementation project (incl an OPS trial) was Ongoing Skyguide conducted which will allows an extension of the ER AMAN.CH 49% 31/12/2023 operational coordination with adjacent centers

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 58 Released Issue

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer ATC17 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - Skyguide ATC system was upgraded to support the Basic procedure. The electronic dialogue in co-ordination prior to the transfer of flights from one ATC unit to the next as well as well as the transfer of communication from one ATC unit to the next ATC unit of such flights using OLDI (SYSCO) messages is not planned. -

Since it is up to the individual ANSP to decide which messages, if any, to implement, the status is set to 'completed' even if there is currently no plan to implement ASP03, ASP04 and ASP05. ASP (By:12/2018) Inter-sector coordination is already implemented in Completed Geneva ACC and inter-centre coordination process has been tested in live trials between Geneva and Zurich VC Skyguide 100% (SYSCO live trials). The deployment of the latter, initially Programme - envisaged in the frame of the Virtual Center Programme was de-scoped in 2015 and is currently not planned.

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: COM10 95% Late Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - Migration from AFTN (Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunication Network) to AMHS (ATS Message Handling System) is mostly achieved. Skyguide is now 'full AMHS' for international 30/06/2020 connections Security issues preventing operational use of the extended AMHS functions are being fixed and the service should be delivered by the end of June 2020. ASP (By:12/2018) The Skyguide project "MESANGE" to renew the Late AFTN/CIDIN/AMHS system as well as the upgrade of existing COM Center CH to provide AMHS capability were completed in 2010. The system is connected to the network and links to other centers are progressively cleared for operation. The Skyguide project "AMS-CH HW/SW Renewal", for Skyguide - 95% updating the AFTN/CIDIN/AMHS system, including the 30/06/2020 acquisition of the latest elements for supporting fully the Extended ATSMHS was completed in 2017. Skyguide is now 'full AMHS' for international connections Security issues preventing operational use of the extended AMHS functions are being fixed and the service should be delivered by the end of June 2020.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 59 Released Issue

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route Timescales: COM11.1 32% Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) implementation is ongoing. 31/12/2025 ASP (By:12/2021) The project "FlexSecto CH VISTA/EMTEL" to migrate Late current phone VCS having access to the ATS network on ATM VoIP was completed The project "SmartRadio" has been launched to install ATM VoIP compatible radios in around 40 radio stations throughout Switzerland. At the network level, migration project towards MPLS is Skyguide - 32% ongoing. This national (international as well, in case 31/12/2025 newPENS not ready) network aims at transporting VoIP with QOS. The Project "Vitel" was launched in 2019 in order to interconnect centres with VoIP. The Project "OneVoice" will be launched in 2020 in order to replace En-Route VCS.

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal Timescales: COM11.2 10% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) implementation in Airport/Terminal is ongoing. 30/08/2023 ASP (By:12/2023) Project "SkyC@t" was launched in order to replace Ongoing Skyguide Airport VCS. ZRH and GVA TWR/APP should be equipped - 10% 30/08/2023 by respectively 11/2021 and 08/2023

New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: COM12 58% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (33 ANSPs): 31/12/2020 Links: B1-SWIM | Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - transition from PENS to newPENS is ongoing in Switzerland 30/05/2020 ASP (By:12/2024) Even if Skyguide is ready to start a transition project to Ongoing Skyguide newPENS, the overall transition highly depends on - 88% 30/05/2020 Eurocontrol and all the other ANSPs. APO (By:12/2024) FZAG - Not yet Zurich - - 0% planned Airport - Not yet GA - Geneva - - 0% planned Airport -

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 60 Released Issue Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 50% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Links: B0-CDO, B1-CDO | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services LSGG - Geneva Airport In 2019, the average CDO performance computed by the PRU for LSGG from Top of Descent 31/12/2020 was 15%. ASP (By:12/2023) Airspace Missing Data - - % Users - Skyguide is active with ECTL CCO/CDO TF to define Ongoing recommended practices for the implementation of CDO. Remarks: -The obligation for ATC to ensure a horizontal segment when vectoring for pilot-interpreted final approach aid, is removed (see ICAO state letter 54 Amendment 7 to PANS-ATM). This will allow exclusion of this horizontal Skyguide - 50% segment in inefficient level segments calculations. - - For the support to CDO operation, ATCO's may need to be trained in this new procedure; there may be certain airspace or route restrictions that prevent the CDO today. However, from the perspective of ATC procedures, CDO is possible already today, and thus no special development is planned in this regard APO (By:12/2023) Today, basic CDA is applied. Ongoing GA - Geneva Genève Aéroport supports the CDO initiatives driven by - 50% Airport Skyguide. Geneva Airport, will take a more proactive 31/12/2020 role to promote CDO (CDA).

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 61 Released Issue

Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ENV01 100% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 Links: B0-CDO, B1-CDO | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services LSZH - Zürich Airport In 2019, the average CDO performance computed by the PRU for LSZH from Top of Descent was 14%. 31/12/2019 ODP Project (SESAR) follow-up trials have started in November 2019 to measure CDO performance and will continue until March 2020. ASP (By:12/2023) Airspace Missing Data - - % Users - BCDAs are in operation. Ongoing Remarks: - The obligation for ATC to ensure a horizontal segment when vectoring for pilot-interpreted final approach aid, is removed (see ICAO state letter 54 Amendment 7 to PANS-ATM). This will allow exclusion of this horizontal Skyguide segment in inefficient level segments calculations. - 100% 31/12/2019 - For the support to CDO operation, ATCO's may need to be trained in this new procedure; there may be certain airspace or route restrictions that prevent the CDO today. However, from the perspective of ATC procedures, CDO is possible already today, and thus no special development is planned in this regard APO (By:12/2023) FZAG - Completed Zurich - - 100% 31/12/2013 Airport

Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: FCM03 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Links: B0-NOPS | Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - Enhanced tactical flow management services are implemented. - ASP (By:12/2017) Both ACCs provide flight plan messaging in ADEXP- Completed Skyguide - 100% format and process APL and ACH messages. -

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 Timescales: FCM04.2 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - STAM - phase 2 was implemented between Geneva and Zürich ACCs 30/06/2017 ASP (By:12/2021) What-if scenarios between the two ACCs were Completed Skyguide implemented in Q2 2017 using CRYSTAL tool as - 100% 30/06/2017 exchange platform.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 62 Released Issue Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: FCM05 75% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B1-ACDM, B1-NOPS | Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - LARA B2B V3 tool is in use (implemented 10/2016) 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) Completed Skyguide - - 100% - APO (By:12/2021) FZAG - Planned Zurich - - 50% 31/12/2021 Airport Airport slots are exchanged with Slot Coordination Completed GA - Geneva Switzerland, which provides the information to NM via - 100% Airport 31/12/2012 the EUACA database (MoC with Eurocontrol).

Traffic Complexity Assessment Timescales: FCM06 70% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B1-NOPS | Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - Skyguide is using CRYSTAL, a traffic complexity and prediction tool which allows supervisors to continuously monitor sector demand and evaluate traffic complexity (by applying predefined 31/12/2021 complexity metrics) according to a predetermined qualitative scale. ASP (By:12/2021) Ongoing Skyguide - - 70% 31/12/2021

Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Not yet FCM08 0% Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 planned Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Links: B1-FICE | Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - Exploration tests with Eurocontrol's NM B2B Interface are conducted but there is no - deployment project planned yet. ASP (By:12/2021) In 2019, Skyguide acquired security certificates and Not yet firewall ports for Eurocontrol's NM B2B connection and planned successfully retrieved Swiss AoI Flight Data using the 'Pull' mechanise on NM B2B Flight Data Service in FIXM v4.0 format. Skyguide In 2020, Skyguide plan to investigate B2B Service - 0% Integration, security and initiate a connection with the - 'Push' NM B2B Flight Data Service. Skyguide also plan to investigate receiving Swiss AoI Flight Data via the 'Push' Mechanism in FIXM v4.0 and possible FIXM V4.2 (planned by NM B2B for Q4 2020)

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 63 Released Issue Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: INF07 21% Late Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) actions are in progress. 31/12/2021 REG (By:05/2018) The Obstacle Concept Switzerland is available and Late includes the Policy for national Obstacles as well as for eTOD. FOCA launched a call for tender in Dec 2019 for the establishment of Data Collection Services. The implementation project should be launched latest mid- 2020 and Services for obstacle established until second FOCA - 40% half 2021. 31/12/2021

State enforcement (revision of national law) is currently ongoing within FOCA and should be enforced in 2021. Terrain database provision: Federal Office of Topography (Swisstopo). ASP (By:05/2018) After the establishment of a national Obstacle Concept, Late FOCA launched a call for tender for the establishment of the data collection services in December 2019. Skyguide will launch a project for the establishment of an interface between data collection services and the Skyguide - 5% authoritative aeronautical database in Switzerland, 31/12/2021 hosted at Skyguide. The relevant legal changes for the ADQ- and TOD implementation are finalised and should be enforced in 2021. APO (By:05/2018) FZAG - Zurich Airport will comply with FOCA requirements on Late Zurich this subject. TOD will be stepwise implemented together - 0% 31/12/2021 Airport with ADQ implementation. Geneva Airport will comply with FOCA requirements on Late GA - Geneva this subject. TOD will be stepwise implemented together - 0% Airport 31/12/2021 with ADQ implementation.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 64 Released Issue

Information Exchanges using the SWIM Yellow TI Profile Timescales: Not yet INF08.1 % Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 planned Full operational capability: 31/12/2024 Links: B1-DATM, B1-SWIM | Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - Exploration tests with Eurocontrol's NM B2B Interface are conducted by Skyguide but there is - no deployment project planned yet. ASP (By:12/2024) In 2019, Skyguide acquired security certificates and Not yet firewall ports for Eurocontrol's NM B2B connection and planned successfully retrieved Swiss AoI Flight Data using the 'Pull' mechanise on NM B2B Flight Data Service in FIXM v4.0 format. Skyguide In 2020, Skyguide plan to investigate B2B Service - % Integration, security and initiate a connection with the - 'Push' NM B2B Flight Data Service. Skyguide also plan to investigate receiving Swiss AoI Flight Data via the 'Push' Mechanism in FIXM v4.0 and possible FIXM V4.2 (planned by NM B2B for Q4 2020) MIL (By:12/2024) Swiss Air Force is closely following the discussions / Not yet Swiss Air development regarding implementation of SWIM Yellow planned - % Force Profile in Switzerland. Identification of local needs is still - ongoing. APO (By:12/2024) FZAG - Not yet Zurich - - % planned Airport - Not yet GA - Geneva - - % planned Airport -

Aircraft Identification Timescales: ITY-ACID 100% Completed Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - All objectives are met since November 2011 For LSZB, LSZG, LSZR and LSGC departures, the implementation will be performed after the 30/11/2011 02/01/2020 deadline ASP (By:01/2020) All objectives are met since November 2011. However, Completed full capability (flight plans / radar tracks correlation based on ACID for 100% of the a/c) is not reached. - Not the whole CH FIR is declared Mode-S to the NMOC. The Mode-S radar coverage over South of the Alps was Skyguide an issue until the 28th of October 2014 and the - 100% 30/11/2011 integration of the Italian Mode-S data into Skyguide MRTS. Declaration of full CH FIR coverage will be done until the 5th of January 2015 - The code 1000 can't be allocated in case of SSR code change

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 65 Released Issue Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: ITY-ADQ 22% Late 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 Links: B0-DATM | Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - An overall Implementation concept has been finalized. A detailed national Implementation 31/12/2023 Concept is available. Implementation of ADQ has been launched. REG (By:06/2017) After the establishment of a national ADQ Analyses, a Late national Obstacle Concept as well as a national implementation Guideline for ADQ, a feasibility Study for the implementation of a national Data collection interface was launched, leading to a FOCA Data FOCA - 10% Collection Services (DCS) call for tender, published in 31/12/2023 Dec 2019. The DCS Implementation Project will be launched mid-2020. The relevant legal changes for the eTOD and ADQ implementation are ongoing and should be enforced in 2021. ASP (By:06/2017) Within the national implementation plan (responsibility Late of State) appropriate ASP implementation activities FABEC AIM Skyguide 41% have been initiated. Applicability to OAT is limited Task Force 31/12/2023 according to national implementation policy. APO (By:06/2017) FZAG - Late Zurich Airport will comply with the implementation plan Zurich - 4% being finalised by the state 31/12/2023 Airport GA - Geneva Geneva Airport will comply with the implementation Late - 0% Airport plan being finalised by the state 31/12/2023

Initial ATC Air-Ground Data Link Services Timescales: ITY-AGDL Entry into force: 06/02/2009 100% Completed ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 Links: B0-TBO | Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - The AGDL CPDLC is in operation in both Geneva and Zurich ACC (above FL245) since end 2012 30/06/2013 (Geneva) and beginning 2013 (Zurich). REG (By:02/2018) The EC Reg 29/2009 has been accepted by the joint Completed FOCA committee CH-EU and is therefore applicable to - 100% 28/02/2013 Skyguide. ASP (By:02/2018) The AGDL CPDLC is in operation in both Geneva and Completed VC Skyguide Zurich ACC (above FL245) since end 2012 (Geneva) and 100% Programme 30/06/2013 beginning 2013 (Zurich). MIL (By:01/2019) Swiss Air Adaptation on existing fleet (five a/c) is, where Completed - 100% Force applicable (one a/c), completed -

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 66 Released Issue 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 ITY-AGVCS2 100% Completed Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - CH is fully compliant with (EU) No 1079/2012. Exempted frequencies are actively managed (FOCA, OFCOM, Skyguide)

All Skyguide and OPC frequency assignments (excluded exemptions and CLIMAX) are converted to 8,33 kHz (8th of November 2018). All Swiss frequency assignments Aerodromes are converted to 8,33 kHz 28th of March 2019. 28/03/2019 All exemptions are issued via FOCA and OFCOM to EC and Eurocontrol. (31/12/2017) SAFIRE Database is up to date. Swiss Air Force (LW) is not be 8.33 kHz compliant as requested by (EC) No 1079/2012 on PC-7 and Cougar fleet (LW sent letter to EC). Transition on these two aircraft type planned in 2022. (no change to previous report) REG (By:12/2018) All Swiss frequency assignments are converted to 8.33 Completed kHz. Exceptions are published to EC accordingly within the FOCA corresponding time. - 100% 28/03/2019 All Swiss frequency assignments for Aerodromes are converted to 8,33 kHz by 28th of March 2019 (EC and Eurocontrol informed). ASP (By:12/2018) Skyguide has started the Project 8.33 kHz below FL195 Completed in Q2 2017. This project assures a smooth change from the 25 kHz bandwidth to the 8.33 kHz bandwidth at the Skyguide controlled locations. Skyguide frequencies are all changed to 8.33 kHz Skyguide - 100% bandwidth on 8th of November 2018. (Granted local 31/12/2018 exemptions ZRH changed in March 2019 to 8.33 kHz). Project will be closed in February 2020 (last exempted Skyguide aerodrome Grenchen (LSZG) 8.33 kHz transition done 5th of December 2019). MIL (By:12/2020) Swiss Air Completed Implementation for State a/c is ongoing - 100% Force 31/12/2018 APO (By:12/2018) GA - Geneva Completed Impacts on APOs are reduced - 100% Airport 31/05/2018 FZAG - Completed Zurich - - 100% 28/02/2014 Airport

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 67 Released Issue Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 ITY-FMTP 100% Completed All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 Links: B0-FICE, B1-FICE | Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - Deployment of the FMTP is completed 27/01/2015 ASP (By:12/2014) First regional trans-border IP network is being deployed Completed for FMTP in the frame of the FABEC and BLUE MED. The first network with the DFS was CfO 2011, a second with the DSNA has followed in 2014. Last implementation Skyguide with DSNA was successfully tested in 2014 and was - 100% 27/01/2015 performed in January 2015. The interconnection with ENAV has been perfomed in June 2012 and in Sept. 2012 between DFS and ENAV. Existing TDM infrastructure will be used for IP network transport. MIL (By:12/2014) Swiss Air ASP action by integrated civil-military provider Skyguide. Completed - 100% Force TCP/IP is implemented between CIV and MIL ATC units. 31/12/2014

Surveillance Performance and Interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 ITY-SPI 100% Completed EHS and ADS-B Out in transport-type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 ELS in transport-type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 Links: B0-ASUR | Key Feature: Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure - Surveillance performance and interoperability requirements are implemented. 31/12/2015 REG (By:02/2015) EC 1207/2011 entered into force in Switzerland in Completed FOCA February 2013. An audit for compliance verification has - 100% 30/09/2013 taken place. ASP (By:02/2015) Surveillance performance and interoperability Completed Skyguide - 100% requirements are implemented 31/12/2015 MIL (By:06/2020) Swiss Air Carriage and operation of Mode S Elementary or Completed - 100% Force enhanced Surveillance avionics is completed 31/12/2013

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 68 Released Issue

RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: NAV03.1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 54% Ongoing One SID and STAR per instrument RWY, where established: 25/01/2024 All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established: 06/06/2030 Links: B0-CCO, B0-CDO, B1-RSEQ | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - RNAV1 procedures are implemented according to local needs. 25/01/2024 REG (By:06/2030) Skyguide and FOCA had a kick-off meeting on 20th May Planned 2019. Skyguide is in progress of making the "PBN IR Transition FOCA Plan". - 0% 25/01/2024 It is planned and expected that in Q3/2020 the "PRB IR Transition Plan for Switzerland" (made by Skyguide) is going to be available for FOCA validation. ASP (By:06/2030) Implementation of RNAV1 procedures is enabled in Ongoing Switzerland and can be developed in accordance with local requirements (users’ capabilities, airspace, OPS concept, etc.). Skyguide - 61% RNAV1 procedures in St Gallen was implemented in 25/01/2024 2010. RNAV 1 procedures will be published on MIL sites where applicable

RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Start: 07/08/2018 NAV03.2 51% Ongoing All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, at PCP airports: 25/01/2024 One SID and STAR per instrument RWY, where established: 25/01/2024 All SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established: 06/06/2030 Links: B1-RSEQ | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - RNP1 deployment in TMA is part of PBN implementation strategy

Remark: It is not exactly specified in the PCP that all SID/STAR have to be RNP 1 but should 25/01/2024 only be if it brings operational benefits. This is not the case in LSZH (in the contrary, as long as DME/DME cannot be used as GNSS reversion in RNP, it's less favorable than RNAV 1). REG (By:06/2030) Skyguide and FOCA had a kick-off meeting on 20th May Planned 2019. Skyguide is in progress of making the "PBN IR Transition FOCA Plan". - 0% 25/01/2024 It is planned and expected that in Q3/2020 the "PRB IR Transition Plan for Switzerland" (made by Skyguide) is going to be available for FOCA validation. ASP (By:06/2030) Ongoing Skyguide Implementation covered through targeted initiatives - 58% 25/01/2024

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 69 Released Issue RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Instrument RWY ends without precision approach in EU SES States, at NAV10 Non-PCP airports: 03/12/2020 69% Ongoing Instrument RWY ends served by precision approach (including PCP airports): 25/01/2024 Instrument RWY ends without precision approach in EU SES States, at PCP airports: 25/01/2024 Links: B0-APTA | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - Approach Procedures with Vertical Guidance have been implemented in LSZH and LSGG. 25/01/2024 REG (By:01/2024) In the framework of the Swiss-wide implementation of Ongoing SESAR-related objectives (CHIPS) performance-based FOCA navigation (PBN) is addressed. The CHIPS-Program - 50% 25/01/2024 includes a number of APVs.

ASP (By:01/2024) The implementation started in 2011 with 1 APV Baro- Ongoing VNAV LSZH RWY 14, and 1 APV SBAS LSGC RWY24 and Skyguide - 74% LSZR RWY10. In addition, Skyguide published SBAS 25/01/2024 RWY06 LSGC and SBAS and APV Baro for LSGG

ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations Timescales: Rotorcraft RNP0.3, RNP1 or RNAV1 ATS routes above FL150, where established.: 03/12/2020 One rotorcraft RNP0.3, RNP01 or RNAV1 SID and STAR per instrument NAV12 57% Ongoing RWY, where established.: 25/01/2024 Rotorcraft RNP0.3, RNP1 or RNAV1 ATS routes below FL150, where established.: 25/01/2024 All rotorcraft RNP0.3, RNP01 or RNAV1 SIDs and STARs per instrument RWY, where established.: 06/06/2030 Links: B1-APTA | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - Low Flight Network (LFN) implemented. 25/01/2024 REG (By:06/2030) Planned FOCA - - 0% 25/01/2024 ASP (By:06/2030) Ongoing Skyguide - - 67% -

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 70 Released Issue

Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: SAF11 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations - All the actions are implemented. 31/12/2015 REG (By:01/2018) Completed FOCA The necessary actions have been taken. - 100% 31/03/2013 ASP (By:12/2014) Completed Skyguide All the actions are implemented. - 100% 31/12/2015 APO (By:12/2014) FZAG - Completed Zurich ZRH: The necessary actions have been taken. - 100% 31/12/2014 Airport GA - Geneva Completed - - 100% Airport 31/12/2014

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 71 Released Issue Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

Direct Routing Timescales: AOM21.1 100% Completed Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017 Links: B0-FRTO, B1-FRTO | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - A Skyguide implemented its first Direct Routes (DCTs) in December 2015, adding up to 50 DCTs in March 2017, and another DCT package in November 2017. With these DCTs implemented, 09/12/2017 Skyguide considers to be compliant with the DCT aspect of the PCP IR. ASP (By:12/2017) Skyguide implemented its first Direct Routes (DCTs) in Completed Skyguide December 2015, adding up to 50 DCTs in March 2017, - 100% 09/12/2017 and another DCT package in November 2017.

Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 for en-route operations ATC02.2 Timescales: 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 Links: B0-SNET | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - Ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 are implemented in its ER - and major TMAs. ASP (By:01/2013) Skyguide has implemented STCA in its ER and applicable Completed Skyguide - 100% TMAs (ZRH, GVA, BRN) -

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Not ATC16 % Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Applicable Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Links: B0-ACAS | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - The requirement for ACAS performance monitoring cannot be linked to any obligation in the provision of ATS. Moreover, it is explicitly required from ATC to apply the identical procedures to ACAS equipped and non-equipped aircraft. - Finally, it should be noted that the ACAS RA now constitutes a safety related occurrence that is mandatory to be reported, as per EU Regulations 376/2014 and 2015/1018. REG (By:12/2015) Completed FOCA Regulatory provisions are implemented. - 100% 31/12/2015

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 72 Released Issue ASP (By:03/2012) Objective ATC16-ASP02 cannot be complied with Not because: Applicable

1. The regulatory framework addresses a phase-in implementation of TCAS II v.7.1, starting with forward fitting as of 01 March 2012, and ending with retrofitting 01 December 2015. Hence, at least by the end of 2015, there will be mixed aircraft population operating in Europe, in terms of TCAS II version equipage. On the other hand, ANSP has no way of knowing which version of TCAS II an aircraft is equipped with, since these data are not provided through a FPL, and hence no appropriate mechanism for monitoring performance of TCAS II v.7.1 can be established.

2. Finish date of the ATC16-ASP02 objective coincides with the start date of the objective ATC16-REG02 (Provide airworthiness certification). Hence, ANSPs are expected to establish a monitoring mechanism for a piece of equipment that still hasn't been certified, i.e. before any such piece of equipment can be found airborne. On the other hand, for a requirement of such Skyguide - % kind, as a minimum testing, operational evaluation and - transition periods have to be defined.

In addition to the above, it should be noted that:

- the ICAO provision the ATC16-ASP02 is based upon is a recommendation, published in a PANS document, for which the ICAO Member States do not have to declare differences with. In addition, when developed, this provision was intended for fundamentally different purpose which does not include monitoring of difference in behaviour of the two different TCAS models. That need is already responded to through the established reporting mechanism - see below.

- for the ECAC region, the ACAS monitoring function is part of the European Safety Programme (ESP) Field 2 (incident reporting and data collection), which is, in turn, developed in response to the Safety Data Reporting and Data Flow Task Force (SAFREP)-s Recommendation No. 7 -to bring rationalisation in European ATM safety data collation and analysis-..-. MIL (By:12/2015) Swiss Air Completed - - 100% Force 31/01/2015

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 73 Released Issue

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Not yet FCM01 87% Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 planned Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Links: B0-NOPS | Key Feature: Optimised ATM Network Services - Enhanced tactical flow management services are mostly implemented or planned - ASP (By:07/2014) Objective partially completed: Not yet - CPRs are sent to the NM. Skyguide is using ASTERIX planned Skyguide CAT 242. There is no translation to CAT 62 foreseen. - 87% - FSAs are sent to the NM. There is no plan to sent FSAs - to the NM for holding flights.

Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and ITY-COTR initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 100% Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Links: B0-FICE | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - Ground-ground automated co-ordination processes are implemented. 28/02/2013 ASP (By:12/2012) Ground-ground automated co-ordination processes are Completed Skyguide - 100% implemented. 28/02/2013 MIL (By:12/2012) Ground-ground automated co-ordination processes are Completed implemented. Skyguide Logon Forwarding (LOF) and Next Authority Notified - 100% 31/12/2012 (NAN), supporting data link service are linked to ITY- AGDL

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 74 Released Issue Local Objectives

Note: Local Objectives are addressing solutions that are considered beneficial for specific operating environments, therefore for which a clear widespread commitment has not been expressed yet. They are characterised with no deadline and voluntary applicability area.

Remote Tower Services Not yet AOP14 % Applicability and timescale: Local planned Links: B1-RATS | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport A study has been launched in 2018 to evaluate the needs for Zürich and Geneva environments. Depending on the result, a project may be launched between 2021 and 2024 for deployment of - remote and/or digitalized tower in Switzerland

Remote Tower Services AOP14 % Planned Applicability and timescale: Local Links: B1-RATS | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSMD - DUBENDORF (MIL) The current military airbase of Dübendorf LSMD shall be transformed into a civil airfield LSZD. In the concept of ANS at civil airfield of Dübendorf, which is completed in 2019 a remote tower 31/12/2028 service is planned. The transformation process is delayed, any implementation date is subject to a legal court case and impossible to predict, currently estimated between 2024 and 2028.

Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport safety nets for the Not yet AOP15 vehicle drivers % planned Applicability and timescale: Local Links: B2-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport Not yet planned due to other airside priorities / budget -

Enhanced traffic situational awareness and airport safety nets for the Not yet AOP15 vehicle drivers % planned Applicability and timescale: Local Links: B2-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport Certain vehicles are equipped with laptops where the airport moving map with the surrounding - traffic can be displayed. There are no alerting functions.

Guidance assistance through airfield ground lighting Not yet AOP16 % Applicability and timescale: Local planned Links: B1-RSEQ, B2-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport Not yet planned due to other airside priorities / budget -

Provision/integration of departure planning information to NMOC Not AOP17 % Applicability and timescale: Local Applicable Links: B1-ACDM, B1-NOPS | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport A-CDM implemented locally since 03.04.14 and connected to NM since 16.03.16 -

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 75 Released Issue Runway Status Lights (RWSL) Not yet AOP18 % Applicability and timescale: Local planned Links: B2-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport Not yet planned due to other airside priorities / budget -

Runway Status Lights (RWSL) Not yet AOP18 % Applicability and timescale: Local planned Links: B2-SURF | Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport No project foreseen. -

Multi-Sector Planning En-route - 1P2T ATC18 % Planned Applicability and timescale: Local Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - First MSP sectors should be deployed between 2020-2021 and 2023-2024 in the frame of 31/12/2024 Virtual Center Tranche 3

Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration ATC19 % Completed Applicability and timescale: Local Links: B2-RSEQ | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - Scheduled for LSGG for 2030 to 2034 and completed for LSZH -

Enhanced STCA with down-linked parameters via Mode S EHS ATC20 % Completed Applicability and timescale: Local Links: B1-SNET | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 is fully applicable in Switzerland meaning that all aircraft having a maximum certified take-off mass exceeding 5 700 kg or maximum cruising true airspeed capability greater than 250 knots will have to be equipped with transponders capable - of ELS, EHS and ADS-B by latest 7 June 2020. STCA safety net in Switzerland uses selected flight level (SFL) information down-linked from the equipped aircraft via the Mode-S EHS protocol.

Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 100% Completed Applicability and timescale: Local Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSGG - Geneva Airport Collaborative Environmental Management is completed. Mitigation on stands is completed. 30/03/2019 The mitigation of the pollution due to deicing activities has been finalised for the area near the runway 22 holding point. The infrastructure has been put in operations in march 2019

Airport Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 100% Completed Applicability and timescale: Local Key Feature: High Performing Airport Operations LSZH - Zürich Airport Collaborative Environmental Management is completed. 30/06/2015

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 76 Released Issue Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 67% Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local Links: B0-CCO | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services LSGG - Geneva Airport The objective is partly completed. Geneva Airport supports Skyguide in trying to enhanced whenever practicable the use of CCO. Due to high terrain on each side of the airport (Mont-Blanc and Jura), most of the departures 31/12/2020 profiles have to be continuous climb in order to fulfil the different FL constraints (PDG - Procedure Design Gradients for instance). In 2019, the average CCO performance computed by the PRU for LSGG to Top of Climb was 67%

Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) ENV03 59% Ongoing Applicability and timescale: Local Links: B0-CCO | Key Feature: Advanced Air Traffic Services LSZH - Zürich Airport The objective is partly completed. PBN flight procedures are implemented and allow CCO performance. 31/12/2020 In 2019, the average CCO performance computed by the PRU for LSZH to Top of Climb was 59%.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 77 Released Issue

6. Annexes

A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Switzerland

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP Focal Point for Switzerland Skyguide Thierry BREGOU LSSIP Focal Point for REG FOCA Ruzica VUJASINOVIC LSSIP Focal Point for MIL MAA / SAF Tamara HABICH LSSIP Focal Point for ASP Skyguide Thierry BREGOU LSSIP Focal Point for APO ZRH FZAG Mattes KETTNER LSSIP Focal Point for APO GVA Genève Aéroport François DURET

Other Focal Points Organisation Name

Focal Point for U-space FOCA Francine ZIMMERMANN Focal Point for NETSYS Skyguide Damian PERREN

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 78 Released Issue

B. National stakeholders organisation charts

The Federal Office of Civil Aviation

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 79 Released Issue

(Organigram as of 31/12/2019)

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 80 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 81 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 82 Released Issue

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 83 Released Issue C. Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR KF, ASBU blocks and more

The table below (extracted from the MPL3 Progress Plan 2019) shows for each implementation objective, the links with the SESAR Key Features, Major ATM Changes, SESAR 1 Solutions, Deployment Program families, ICAO ASBU, EASA EPAS and AAS TP milestones.

SESAR Major ATM SESAR DP ICAO ASBU Level 3 Implementation Objectives Key EPAS AAS TP change Solution family B0, B1, B2 Feature AOM13.1 - Harmonise OAT and GAT handling FRA & A-FUA - - - - -

B1-FRTO B1- AOM19.1 - ASM tools to support A-FUA FRA & A-FUA #31 3.1.1 - AM-1.8 NOPS AOM19.2 - ASM management of real-time airspace B1-FRTO FRA & A-FUA #31 3.1.2 - AM-1.8 data B1-NOPS B1-FRTO AOM19.3 - Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM FRA & A-FUA #31 3.1.3 B1-NOPS - AM-1.8 information sharing B2-NOPS AOM19.4 – Management of Pre-defined Airspace B1-FRTO FRA & A-FUA #31 3.1.4 - - Configurations B1-NOPS FCM03 - Collaborative flight planning ATFCM - 4.2.3 B0-NOPS - AM-1.14

*FCM04.1 – STAM phase 1 ATFCM - 4.1.1 - - -

FCM04.2 - STAM phase 2 ATFCM #17 4.1.2 - - AM-1.11

4.2.2 B1-ACDM B1- - FCM05 - Interactive rolling NOP NOP #20, #21 AM-1.12 4.2.4 NOPS - FCM06 - Traffic Complexity Assessment ATFCM #19 4.4.2 B1-NOPS AM-1.13

FCM07 - Calculated Take-off Time (CTOT) to Target 4.3.1 - ATFCM #18 B1-NOPS AM-1.9 Times for ATFCM Purposes 4.3.2 - FCM09 - Enhanced ATFM Slot swapping ATFCM #56 - B1-NOPS -

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 84 Released Issue SESAR Major ATM SESAR DP ICAO ASBU Level 3 Implementation Objectives Key EPAS AAS TP change Solution family B0, B1, B2 Feature 3.2.1 B0-FRTO - *AOM21.1 - Direct Routing Free Route #32 - 3.2.3 B1-FRTO - AM-1.6 3.2.1 AOM21.2 - Free Route Airspace Free route #33, #66 B1-FRTO AM-1.10 3.2.4 AM-5.1 B0-SNET - ATC02.8 - Ground based safety nets ATM Systems - 3.2.1 - B1-SNET B0-SNET ATC02.9 – Enhanced STCA for TMAs ATM Systems #60 - MST.030 - B1-SNET Enhanced - ATC07.1 - Arrival management tools - 1.1.1 B0-RSEQ - Arrival Seq #27, - AM-1.15 ATC12.1 - MONA, TCT and MTCD ATM Systems 3.2.1 B1-FRTO #104 AM-5.1 Enhanced - ATC15.1 – Initial extension of AMAN to En-route - 1.1.2 B1-RSEQ - Arrival Seq Enhanced - ATC15.2 - Extension of AMAN to En-route #05 1.1.2 B1-RSEQ AM-1.3 Arrival Seq - ATC17 - Electronic Dialog supporting COTR Free Route - 3.2.1 - AM-1.3

- AM-4.3 ATC18 – Multi Sector Planning En-route – 1P2T Free Route #63 - - AM-5.1 Enhanced - ATC19 - Enhanced AMAN-DMAN integration #54 - B2-RSEQ - Arrival Seq ATC20- Enhanced STCA with down-linked parameters - ATM Systems #69 - B1-SNET - via Mode S EHS B0-CDO - ENV01 – Continuous Descent Operations PBN - - - B1-CDO - ENV03 – Continuous Climb Operations PBN - - B0-CCO -

B0-CDO RMT.0639 NAV03.1 – RNAV1 in TMA Operations PBN #62 - B0-CCO - RMT.0445 B1-RSEQ

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 85 Released Issue SESAR Major ATM SESAR DP ICAO ASBU Level 3 Implementation Objectives Key EPAS AAS TP change Solution family B0, B1, B2 Feature 1.2.3 RMT.0639 NAV03.2 – RNP1 in TMA Operations PBN #09, #51 B1-RSEQ - 1.2.4 RMT.0445 RMT.0639 1.2.1 NAV10 - RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY PBN #103 B0-APTA RMT.0445 - 1.2.2 RMT.0643 NAV12 – ATS IFR Routes for Rotorcraft Operations PBN #113 - B1-APTA MST.031 -

- AOP04.1 - A-SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Surface mgt #70 2.2.1 B0-SURF -

- AOP04.2 - A-SMGCS RMCA (former Level 2) Surface mgt - 2.2.1 B0-SURF -

Collaborative 2.1.1 B0-ACDM - AOP05 - Airport CDM #106 - Apt 2.1.3 B0-RSEQ Enhanced ops - B1-RSEQ AOP10 - Time Based Separation in vicinity of #64 2.3.1 - B2-WAKE rwy Collaborative - AOP11 - Initial Airport Operations Plan #21 2.1.4 B1-ACDM - Apt AOP12 - Improve RWY and Airfield safety with CATC 2.1.2 - Surface mgt #02 B2-SURF - detection and CMAC 2.5.1 B1-ACDM - AOP13 – Automated assistance to Controller for #22 Surface mgt 2.4.1 B1-RSEQ - Surface Movement planning and routing #53 B2-SURF Remote #12, #71, AOP14 – Remote Tower Services - B1-RATS RMT.0624 - Tower #52, #13 AOP15 - Enhanced traffic situational awareness and - Surface mgt #04 - B2-SURF - airport SNET for the vehicle drivers AOP16 - Guidance assistance through airfield ground B1-RSEQ - Surface mgt #47 - - lighting B2-DURF AOP17 - Provision/integration of departure planning Collaborative B1-ACDM - #61 - - information to NMOC Apt B1-NOPS

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 86 Released Issue SESAR Major ATM SESAR DP ICAO ASBU Level 3 Implementation Objectives Key EPAS AAS TP change Solution family B0, B1, B2 Feature - AOP18 - Runway Status Lights (RWSL) Surface mgt #01 - B2-SURF -

ENV02 – Airport Collaborative Environmental Collaborative - - - - - Management Apt Enhanced ops - NAV11 - Implement precision approach using GBAS in vicinity of #55 - B1-APTA - CAT II/III based on GPS L1 rwy MST.007 SAF11 - Improve runway safety by preventing runway Surface mgt - - - RMT.0570 - excursions RMT.0703 - COM10 - Migration from AFTN to AMHS CNS rat. - - - -

COM11.1 - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in En- - CNS rat. - 3.1.4 - AM-1.3 Route COM11.2 - Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in - CNS rat. - - - - Airport/Terminal Pre-SWIM & 5.1.2 - COM12 - NewPENS - B1-SWIM - SWIM 5.2.1 Pre-SWIM & - FCM08 – Extended Flight Plan #37 4.2.3 B1-FICE AM-1.4 SWIM RMT.0703 Pre-SWIM & INF07 - Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (e-TOD) - 1.2.2 - RMT.0704 - SWIM RMT.0722 5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, INF08.1 - Information Exchanges using the SWIM Pre-SWIM & B1-DATM #35, #46 5.2.3, - AM-1.5 Yellow TI Profile SWIM B1-SWIM 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1, 5.6.1

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 87 Released Issue

SESAR Major SESAR DP ICAO ASBU Level 3 Implementation Objectives Key ATM EPAS AAS TP Solution family B0, B1, B2 Feature change 5.1.3, 5.1.4, INF08.2 - Information Exchanges using the SWIM Blue Pre-SWIM 5.2.1, B1-DATM #28, #46 - AM-9.1 TI Profile & SWIM 5.2.2, B1-SWIM 5.2.3, 5.6.2 Pre-SWIM B1-DATM - INF09 - Digital Integrated Briefing #34 - - & SWIM B1-SWIM - ITY-ACID - Aircraft identification CNS rat. - - - -

ITY-ADQ - Ensure quality of aeronautical data and Pre-SWIM RMT.0722 - 1.2.2 B0-DATM - aeronautical information & SWIM RMT.0477 6.1.1 ITY-AGDL - Initial ATC air-ground data link services Data link - 6.1.3 B0-TBO RMT.0524 AM-1.1 6.1.4 ITY-AGVCS2 – 8.33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel - CNS rat. - - - - Spacing below FL195 ITY-FMTP - Apply a common flight message transfer Pre-SWIM B0-FICE - - - AM-1.3 protocol (FMTP) & SWIM B1-FICE RMT.0679 ITY-SPI - Surveillance performance and interoperability CNS rat. - - B0-ASUR - RMT.0519 * AOM21.1 was achieved in 2017 and FCM04.1 was achieved in 2018, therefore they were removed from the Implementation Plan 2018/2019. They are kept in this table for traceability purposes. Legend: Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:

Optimised ATM Network Services High Performing Airport Operations

Advanced Air Traffic Services Enabling Aviation Infrastructure

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 88 Released Issue D. SESAR Solutions implemented in a voluntary way6

These SESAR Solutions are not included yet in the ATM MP L3 Plan. EUROCONTROL is tasked by the SJU to identify the implementation progress of functionalities corresponding to validated SESAR Solutions published in the SJU Solutions Catalogue (https://www.sesarju.eu/newsroom/brochures- publications/sesar-solutions-catalogue), for which there is no implementation Objective (yet) in the ATM MP L3 Plan. This will allow to identify early movers and to gauge the interest generated by some of these functionalities, with the view of potentially addressing them with new Implementation Objectives in the ATM MPL3 Plan. A facilitated questionnaire using the existing ATM MP L3 / LSSIP methodology is added to capture information on non- committed SESAR solutions. For practical reasons, since the LSSIP 2017 cycle the questionnaire is included in the LSSIP Annex.

Are there implementation Has the SESAR plans in your State for the Solution been SESAR Solution? (Y-N- implemented N/A) SESAR SESAR in your State? - If “Yes” please report Solution Solution Solution Description (Y-N) when and where Code Title - if “Yes” implementation is please report planned where - If “N/A” please provide justification

High Performing Airport Operations

Use of data link communications between the Tower Controllers and the D-TAXI service flight crew during surface movement. for controller- It is based on the D-TAXI service from the pilot datalink CPDLC application, as standardised by #23 No Yes: 2035-2039 communicatio RTCA SC214/EUROCAE WG78 (DO-350 & ns (CPDLC) DO-351). It also includes the access to application this service for end users, through the Tower CWP for the ATCO and through the aircraft DCDU for the flight crew. In low visibility conditions, the tower controller working positions are provided with Virtual Stop Bars (VSB) to improve low visibility operations and enhance No Virtual block controllers¿ situational awareness. LSZH and LSGG: already control in low Virtual Stop Bars can be used by the "real" block control with #48 visibility controller to reduce block-sizes once No procedures procedural control applies. Additional stop bars. (LVPs) controller safety nets will be available to indicate violations of Stop Bars (including Virtual Stop Bars) and to monitor aircraft for any kind of unauthorised movement (Watch Dog).

6 Referred as ‘Non-committed’ SESAR solutions in the MP L3 Report.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 89 Released Issue Are there implementation Has the SESAR plans in your State for the Solution been SESAR Solution? (Y-N- implemented N/A) SESAR SESAR in your State? - If “Yes” please report Solution Solution Solution Description (Y-N) when and where Code Title - if “Yes” implementation is please report planned where - If “N/A” please provide justification The solution increases the accuracy of information related to when the procedure is going to take place, how long it will take and when the aircraft will be ready to taxi for departure, which is currently calculated by predetermined estimates. The solution means that air traffic controllers no longer need to work without situational awareness of de-icing activities and needing to make their own estimates of when aircraft are ready for departure. The solution envisages that de-icing operations are no longer characterised by the A-CDM concept as Yes: LSZH, already ‘adverse conditions’, i.e. a state that is in De-icing implemented since Winter need of collaborative recovery #116 management No 2012/2013 procedures, but rather a part of normal tool operations in the winter period. The DIMT allows for the scheduling and No for LSGG monitoring of de-icing operations. It is an internet browser-based tool that addresses three distinct procedures for de-icing: - Remote de-icing, which occurs at a specific location on the airport away from the parking stand; - On-stand de-icing, which occurs just before the aircraft leaves its stand; and - After-push de-icing, which occurs after the aircraft has pushed back from the stand and is positioned to start taxiing after de-icing. The SESAR Solution “Reducing landing minima in low visibility conditions using enhanced Flight vision systems (EFVS)” is intended for flight crews, and corresponds to the use of EFVS visual based technologies displayed in HUD or Reducing an equivalent display system. The Landing objective is to provide operational credit Minima in in approach as permitted per EASA EU Low Visibility 965/2012 and its coming amendments Conditions (NPA 2018-06 AWO) to face to Low #117 No No using visibility conditions. Enhanced Flight Vision Enabling EFVS operations with Systems operational credits provides a greater (EFVS) availability of suitable destination and alternate aerodromes during periods of reduced visibility.

This effectively reduces the number of weather-related delays, cancellations or diversions of flights to CAT II/III

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 90 Released Issue Are there implementation Has the SESAR plans in your State for the Solution been SESAR Solution? (Y-N- implemented N/A) SESAR SESAR in your State? - If “Yes” please report Solution Solution Solution Description (Y-N) when and where Code Title - if “Yes” implementation is please report planned where - If “N/A” please provide justification aerodromes, permits shorter routings and reduced fuel costs, a faster return to scheduled operations, and less passenger inconveniences.

A unique advantage of the EFVS on board solution is that it is mainly supported by the aircraft system instead of airports and the need of complex and costly ground infrastructures as those implemented in CATII/III airports.

From a global ATM network standpoint, the EFVS operation allows to retain traffic at most of secondary aerodromes by providing operational credit at most of runway ends with precision or non- precision landing minima (LPV, LNAV/ VNAV, ILS CAT1…). The operational credit provided by EFVS is particularly important regarding secondary aerodromes because they usually have CAT1 or higher than CAT 1 RVR ¿ DA/DH minima and are therefore potentially more frequently impacted by adverse weather conditions.

In addition, EFVS capability is a key operational advantage more especially for the business aviation community that is mainly composed of small/ medium operators with limited resources and operating frequently at small/ medium airports. Beyond operational credit, the Vision Systems such as the EFVS improves situational awareness in all weather conditions for all operators at all airports contributing supporting decision-making and increasing safety margin all the time.

Advanced Air Traffic Services

The CTA (Controlled Time of Arrival) is an Controlled ATM imposed time constraint on a time of arrival defined point associated with an arrival (CTA) in runway, using airborne capabilities to medium- #06 improve arrival management. When a No No. density/ time constraint is needed for a flight, the medium- ground system may calculate a CTA as complexity part of the arrival management process, environments and then it may be proposed to the flight

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 91 Released Issue Are there implementation Has the SESAR plans in your State for the Solution been SESAR Solution? (Y-N- implemented N/A) SESAR SESAR in your State? - If “Yes” please report Solution Solution Solution Description (Y-N) when and where Code Title - if “Yes” implementation is please report planned where - If “N/A” please provide justification for achievement by avionics within required accuracy. Airborne information may be used by the ground system in determining the CTA (e.g. ETA min/max) and in monitoring the implementation of the CTA.

The system provides support to coordination of traffic flows into multiple airports to enable a smooth delivery to the runways. The 'Center Manager' (CMAN) which accompanies the AMANs of the airports generates a combined planning for several arrival streams into Arrival different airports by calculating the management sequence of aircraft flying towards an #08 No Planned in 2025-2029. into multiple area where their routes intersect. By airports imposing an adequate spacing of the aircraft in that area, a Time To Lose (TTL) for the appropriate upstream E-TMA sector is calculated to meet this constraint. Both AMAN-TTL for the runway and TTL for the E-TMA sector are superimposed and presented to the upstream en-route sector controllers. Based on Advanced-RNP navigation specification, design of optimised routes Optimised e.g. spaced parallel routes, Fixed Radius route network Transition (FRT) and Tactical Parallel #10 No No using Offset (TPO) further enhanced by on advanced RNP board performance monitoring and alerting and the execution of more predictable aircraft behaviour Progressive implementation of Continuous procedures for Continuous Descent descent Operations (CDO) and Continuous Climb #11 operations No No Operations (CCO) in higher density traffic (CDO) using or to higher levels, optimised for each point merge airport arrival/departure procedure New altitude capture laws aim to reduce Enhanced unnecessary ACAS alarms and reduce the airborne risk of mid-air or near mid-air collisions collision between aircraft as a last-resort safety avoidance net, by automatically reducing the #105 system (ACAS) No No vertical rate at the approach of the operations selected flight level (only when a Traffic using the Advisories-TA occurs), leading to less autoflight traffic perturbation, while not increasing system flight crew workload.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 92 Released Issue Are there implementation Has the SESAR plans in your State for the Solution been SESAR Solution? (Y-N- implemented N/A) SESAR SESAR in your State? - If “Yes” please report Solution Solution Solution Description (Y-N) when and where Code Title - if “Yes” implementation is please report planned where - If “N/A” please provide justification This new procedure design builds upon precision navigation technology (P-RNAV Point merge concept) for merging traffic into a single in complex #107 entry point, which allows efficient No No airspace constraints terminal integration and sequencing of inbound airspace traffic together with Continuous Descent Approaches (CDA). No

NB: feasibility study conducted in 2011 for Point Merge in high density environment GVA. The flowing and complex Extended TMA (E-TMA) Arrival constraints / limitations sectors replaces radar vectoring with a Management had been highlighted: #108 more efficient and simplified traffic No (AMAN) and synchronisation mechanism that reduces - Procedures difficult to be Point Merge communication workload and increases implemented due to the collective traffic predictability. surrounding mountains around the airport. - Proximity of the INI sectors above the TMA airspace The basic Extended ATC Planner aims at bridging the gap between Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management (ATFCM) and Air Traffic Control (ATC) providing real- time and fine-tuning measures to solve ATFCM hotspots, and to perform early measures to alleviate complexity closest to ATC activities.

The solution consists of an automated tool and associated procedures Basic EAP supporting the basic communication CRYSTAL ACC (deployed in (Extended #118 between the Local DCB position and the yes 2010) ATC Planning) Controllers' Work Positions allowing the CRYSTAL TWR-APP (Q2 2020) function EAP and the ATC team in identifying, assessing and resolving local complexity situations. The basic EAP relies on a real time integrated process for managing the complexity of the traffic with capability to reduce traffic peaks through early implementation of fine-tuned solutions to solve workload imbalances at the local level, compatible with the short-term timeframe of execution phase of the flights.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 93 Released Issue Optimised ATM Network Services

Airspace Users are allowed to change among themselves (via the pre- departure management process in CDM User-driven airports) the priority order of flights in prioritisation the pre-departure sequence. The #57 process Yes 2030-2034 departure time will be automatically (UDPP) communicated/coordinated with the departure Network Management Function (NMF) via the DPI message as described in the A-CDM concept.

Enabling Aviation Infrastructure

Europe’s vision to achieve high- performing aviation by 2035 builds on the idea of trajectory-based operations – meaning that aircraft can fly their preferred trajectory while minimising AOC data constraints due to airspace and service increasing configurations. SESAR has introduced an Intention to implement in #67 trajectory early version, which makes use of flight No

prediction planning data sourced from airline 2025-2029 accuracy operational control (AOC) to help controllers optimise aircraft flight paths. This solution represents an initial step towards the extended flight plan solution and flight and flow information for a collaborative environment (FF-ICE). The ACAS provides resolution advisories (RAs) to pilots in order to avoid collisions. Controllers rely on pilots to report RAs by radio as they occur in accordance with ACAS Ground ICAO regulations. However these reports Monitoring can come late, incomplete or are, absent #100 and No No in some instances. This solution consists Presentation of a set of monitoring stations and a System server system, which enable the continuous monitoring and analysis of ACAS RAs and coordination messages between airborne units from the ground. This solution consists of an enhanced TCAS capability, adding passive surveillance methods and reducing the Extended need for active Mode-S interrogations. #101 hybrid No No By making fewer active interrogations, surveillance this solution allows the aircraft to significantly reduce the usage of the 1090 MHz frequency. The aeronautical mobile airport communication system (AeroMACS) offers a solution to offload the saturated VHF datalink communications in the airport environment and support new Aeronautical services. The technical solution mobile airport AeroMACS is based on commercial 4G #102 communi- No No technology and uses the IEEE 802.16 cation system (WiMAX) standard. Designed to operate (AeroMACS) in reserved (aeronautical) frequency bands, AeroMACS can be used for ANSPs, airspace users and airport authority communications, in compliance with SESAR’s future communication

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 94 Released Issue infrastructure (FCI) concept. AeroMACS is an international standard and supports globally harmonised and available capabilities according to ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP).

The Iris Precursor offers a viable option for ATS datalink using existing satellite technology systems to support initial Air traffic four-dimensional (i4D) datalink services (ATS) #109 capability. The technology can be used to No No datalink using provide end-to-end air–ground Iris Precursor communications for i4D operations, connecting aircraft and air traffic management ground systems. The SESAR solution consists of the ADS-B ground station and the surveillance data processing and distribution (SDPD) functionality. The solution also offers mitigation techniques against deliberate spoofing of the ground system by outside ADS-B agents. These techniques can also be surveillance of used to cope with malfunctioning of #110 aircraft in No No avionics equipment. SESAR has flight and on contributed to the relevant standards, the surface such as EUROCAE technical specifications, incorporating new functionalities developed for the ADS-B ground station, ASTERIX interface specifications as well as to the SDPD specifications. By allowing the use of ADS-B data that has been validated against data derived in parallel by a WAM system, the system can help to reduce the number of interrogations and number of replies and therefore reduce the 1030/1090 MHz RF load and improve spectrum efficiency. It achieves this through the integration of validated data items into the WAM channel, thereby preventing a need to Composite Yes re-interrogate the data item. #114 Surveillance No (06/2021 for the deployment Since the two surveillance layers share ADS-B / WAM of a technical platform) hardware components, the system offers improved cost efficiency. Furthermore, the use of the system contributes to an improved security by successfully mitigating associated ADS-B threats. SESAR has contributed to the relevant standards, such as EUROCAE technical specifications for WAM and ADS-B that are implementing this “composite” concept.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 95 Released Issue E. Military Organisations Infrastructure

This Annex is not produced in 2019. It will be updated every second year, therefore it will be produced as part of the LSSIP 2020 document.

In case information is sought on military infrastructure, previous LSSIP may be made available upon request to the respective Focal Point and/or Contact Person.

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 96 Released Issue F. Glossary of abbreviations

This Annex mainly shows the abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Document for Switzerland. Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in: https://www.eurocontrol.int/airial/

Term Description

ACC Area Control Centre AF ATM Functionality AGY EUROCONTROL Agency AIC Aeronautical Information Circular AIP Aeronautical Information Publication ANSP Air Navigation Services Provider AOM Airspace Organisation Management ARINC Aeronautical Radio Incorporated ASM Airspace Management ATC Air Traffic Control ATCO Air Traffic Control Officer ATFCM Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management ATFM Air Traffic Flow Management ATIS Automatic Terminal Information Service ATM Air Traffic Management ATN Aeronautical Telecommunications Network ATS Air Traffic Services CAA Civil Aviation Authority CDM Collaborative Decision Making CFMU Central Flow Management Unit CIDIN Common ICAO Data Interchange Network CPDLC Controller Pilot Data Link Communications CTA Control Area EAD European Aeronautical Database EC European Commission/Community ECAC European Civil Aviation Conference EDA European Defence Agency EEC EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre (Bretigny) EGNOS European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service ESA European Space Agency EU European Union EUROCAE European Organisation for Civil Aviation Equipment

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 97 Released Issue Term Description

FCM Flow and Capacity Management FDPS Flight Data Processing System FIR Flight Information Region (ICAO) FIS Flight Information Services FMP Flow Management Position FMS Flow Management System FOCA Federal Office of Civil Aviation (Switzerland) FT Fast Tracks FUA Flexible Use of Airspace FZAG Flughafen Zürich AG GAT General Air Traffic GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System GPS Global Positioning System IANS EUROCONTROL Institute for Air Navigation Services IATA International Air Transport Association ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation IFATCA International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers Association MET Meteorology MIL Military NAV Navigation NOTAM Notice to Airmen OAT Operational Air Traffic OLDI On Line Data Interchange PCP Pilot Common Project DP Deployment Programme RDPS Radar Data Processing System R&D Research & Development RWY Runway SAF Safety Management S-AF Sub ATM Functionality SAR Search and Rescue SARPS Standard and Recommended Practices (ICAO) SLoA Stakeholder Line of Action STATFOR Statistics and Forecast TMA Terminal Control Area UAC Upper Area Control (Centre) VFR Visual Flight Rules VHF Very High Frequency VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

LSSIP Year 2019 Switzerland - Level 1 98 Released Issue