DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission of Raidió Teilifís Éireann for Amendments to Section 77 of the Broadcasting Act 2009 and Section 103 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submission of Raidió Teilifís Éireann for Amendments to Section 77 of the Broadcasting Act 2009 and Section 103 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000 10th July 2017 Submission of Raidió Teilifís Éireann for amendments to section 77 of the Broadcasting Act 2009 and section 103 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000. 1. Proposed Amendments to the Broadcasting Act, 2009 (“the Broadcasting Act”). For ease of reference, RTÉ has inserted its proposed amendments below (marked in red) within the relevant sections of the Act. The amendments proposed are straightforward, and they are set out below with accompanying explanation provided as to why the amendments are sought. As the obligations set out in the Broadcasting Act apply to RTÉ, TG4 and TV3, the amendments proposed will apply to other Irish indigenous broadcasters. Amendments to Section 77(11) (11) Without prejudice to the requirements imposed under sub-section (4), RTÉ, TG4 and the television service programme contractor shall ensure that their must-offer services are at all times offered for re-transmission (subject to agreement as to fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms of use and payment) by means of any appropriate network that is available for reception in an intelligible form by members of the public on the whole of or in part of the State. used by a significant number of end users as their principal means of receiving transmissions of programme material. The first proposed amendment is the addition of the words “and payment”. This would, in RTÉ’s view, address the issue that the must offer obligation as currently expressed in the Act can be read as requiring RTÉ, TG4 and TV3 (as the television programme contractor) to make their free to air television services/content available to a wide range of networks, with no return or consideration for that content being made to any of those broadcasters. The market for the distribution of high quality television content and channels in Ireland and elsewhere has changed radically. New platform operators are entering into the distribution market, bundling television phone (fixed and mobile) and broadband services. Larger network owners such as Virgin Media / Liberty Global and Sky have been launching a range of ancillary internet based television services to add to their existing cable and satellite offerings in order to increase their subscriber base. The market does not currently reflect the true value of Irish channels and content to those networks. As currently worded, the Act could be read as preventing a broadcaster from seeking to make any return, or from seeking to receive any payment in respect of its channels and content being re-transmitted on such networks. This in turn limits the amount of investment that can be made by the broadcasters in indigenous content production. The second proposed amendment, the wording inserted at the end of Section 77(11), addresses a separate issue. The wording proposed is designed to ensure that the wide ranging must offer obligation imposed on RTÉ, TG4 and TV3, which (as noted above) potentially extends to a vast number of networks irrespective of size, is at least proportional in its application to the broadcaster. The wording proposed at the end of the Section 77(11) above largely reflects the wording that is found at Section 272 of the UK’s Communications Act, 2003 which sets out the must offer obligation applicable to relevant broadcasters in the UK. This proposed amendment also reflects the wording that already appears at Section 77(2) of the Act. The latter provision permits the BAI in consultation with ComReg to determine whether a network is used by a significant number of end users as their principal means of receiving transmissions of programme material. This arises in the context of Section 77(4) for example and the other sub- sections cited at Section 77(2). RTÉ would propose that a similar consultative process could apply with regard to the obligation of must offer at Section 77(11) thus ensuring consistency of approach to the obligation imposed on the broadcaster. Amendment to Section 77(12) RTÉ, TG4 and the television service programme contractor shall ensure that their must-offer services are at all times offered for broadcast or re-transmission (subject to agreement as to fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms of use and payment) by means of every satellite television service. This is a similar amendment as already proposed to sub-section (11) above to address the issue that the broadcasters in question are obliged to offer their free to air television services to satellite television service providers without, on the face of it, any attendant entitlement to charge or secure any return or benefit in respect of the value of their content. The research that RTÉ has conducted confirms that the inclusion of high quality Irish channels and content (such as that provided by RTÉ, TG4 and TV3) within an offering by the likes of Sky directly benefits that platform in securing Irish subscribers. Again RTÉ would re-iterate the points made above with regard to the manner in which the distribution market has changed in Ireland and elsewhere. There is an urgent need to address within the legislative landscape, the unlevel playing field that currently exists between Irish broadcasters as content and channel providers on the one hand, and operators of satellite, cable and internet platforms on the other. - 2 - 2. Proposed Amendments to the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000 Section 103 Repeal of Section 103 RTÉ proposes that the exception created by section 103 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000 is repealed in its entirety. RTÉ proposes this for a number of reasons. The first is that the Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled (in ITV Broadcasting v TV Catchup. C-275/15) that a similar provision in the UK’s Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is not compatible with the Information Society Directive: “Article 9 of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, and specifically the concept of ‘access to cable of broadcasting services’, must be interpreted as not covering, and not permitting, national legislation which provides that copyright is not infringed in the case of the immediate retransmission by cable, including, where relevant, via the internet, in the area of initial broadcast, of works broadcast on television channels subject to public service obligations.” The UK provision, section 73 and 73A of the 1988 Act, has now been repealed by the Digital Economy Act 2017, with the repeal shortly to become effective. In the light of the CJEU’s decisions in this case, it is clear that unless section 103 is repealed, the European Commission will be entitled to take proceedings against the State for contravening the requirements of the Information Society Directive. The exception permits an operator of a cable programme service to re-transmit the free to air television broadcasts of RTÉ, TG4 and TV3 without any requirement to clear copyright. This exception was designed to ensure that where cable and MMDS providers were obliged to ensure that the then RTÉ television and radio services were carried, they would not additionally be obliged to clear copyright. This exception encouraged the roll out of cable and MMDS as a competing platform to off-air reception of terrestrial television broadcasts. Given the current state of development of the cable market in Ireland the rationale that informed the creation of section 103 has now fallen away and is no longer relevant. In addition, cable companies no longer have local monopoly characteristics as the market for distribution in Ireland has fundamentally changed since the inception of this copyright exception in the Copyright Act, 1963. The obligation by way of “must carry” with regard to Irish channels has no relevance, as much has changed with the development of digital television on cable and satellite and on IP platforms. There is now a multiplicity of networks which make television content available as exemplified by the definition of “electronic communications networks” set out at the beginning of the Broadcasting Act. Irish broadcasters are already under an extensive must offer obligation in respect of a whole range of networks, of which cable/MMDS networks are - 3 - but one. Therefore the case for having a specific copyright exception for a specific platform simply no longer applies. Amendment to Section 101 RTÉ proposes that Section 101 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000 is amended as follows: —(1) The making in domestic premises for private and domestic use of a fixation of a broadcast or cable programme solely for the purpose of enabling it to be viewed or listened to at another time or place shall not infringe the copyright in the broadcast or cable programme or in any work included in such a broadcast or cable programme. (2) Subject to subsection (3), the making by an establishment for private and domestic use of a fixation of a broadcast or cable programme solely for the purpose of enabling it to be viewed or listened to at another time shall not infringe the copyright in the broadcast or cable programme or in any work included in such a broadcast or cable programme. (3) The Minister may specify by order establishments for the purposes of this section. (4) Where a fixation which would otherwise be an infringing copy is made under this section and is subsequently sold, rented or (otherwise than to a person's family member or friend for private and domestic purposes) lent, or offered or exposed for sale, rental or loan, or otherwise made available to the public, it shall be deemed to be an infringing copy for those purposes and for all subsequent purposes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TG4 Strikes Gold for Its Autumn Schedule
    1/09/2015 TG4 Strikes Gold for its Autumn Schedule Original Drama from the Alaskan Gold Rush, Fireside chats, Music in Glens and Top-class Sport at home and abroad An entertaining and distinctive Autumn 2015 offering from TG4, announced today includes a new powerful Irish language drama series set in the Klondike Gold Rush. It also brings a fresh approach for televising traditional music and shows how our lives are still governed by folklore. We decode the secrets locked in Irish place- names and offer exciting young peoples’ programmes with a difference. There is also a mouth-watering line-up of free to view movies and a great selection of exclusive live Gaelic games, rugby and racing from the Listowel Festival. Highlights include An Klondike: A major new original 4 part drama series set in the harsh world of the gold mines of Alaska over a century ago. Three Connemara-born brothers venture from the silver mines of Montana to the Alaskan Gold Rush of 1895. They seek their fortune in Dominion Creek, a town built on greed. All that glisters… Cogar: Documentaries that concentrate on people more than on issues: Remembering a German U Boat commander’s humanitarian landing in West Kerry young film actors Judi Dench and Jeremy Irons’ bringing scandal to south Kilkenny in the 1970s, growing tomatoes to save the Gaeltacht in the 1950s, the amazing secret life of a 19th century Louth woman who spent much of her life disguised as a man in the US Army and the forgotten story of the Major-League US baseball stars whose secret code during play was simplicity itself – they were native speakers and talked Irish to one another.
    [Show full text]
  • British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc Annual Report 2009 U07039 1010 P1-2:BSKYB 7/8/09 22:08 Page 1 Bleed: 2.647 Mm Scale: 100%
    British Sky Broadcasting Group plc Annual Report 2009 U07039 1010 p1-2:BSKYB 7/8/09 22:08 Page 1 Bleed: 2.647mm Scale: 100% Table of contents Chairman’s statement 3 Directors’ report – review of the business Chief Executive Officer’s statement 4 Our performance 6 The business, its objectives and its strategy 8 Corporate responsibility 23 People 25 Principal risks and uncertainties 27 Government regulation 30 Directors’ report – financial review Introduction 39 Financial and operating review 40 Property 49 Directors’ report – governance Board of Directors and senior management 50 Corporate governance report 52 Report on Directors’ remuneration 58 Other governance and statutory disclosures 67 Consolidated financial statements Statement of Directors’ responsibility 69 Auditors’ report 70 Consolidated financial statements 71 Group financial record 119 Shareholder information 121 Glossary of terms 130 Form 20-F cross reference guide 132 This constitutes the Annual Report of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (the ‘‘Company’’) in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘‘IFRS’’) and with those parts of the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS and is dated 29 July 2009. This document also contains information set out within the Company’s Annual Report to be filed on Form 20-F in accordance with the requirements of the United States (“US”) Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). However, this information may be updated or supplemented at the time of filing of that document with the SEC or later amended if necessary. This Annual Report makes references to various Company websites. The information on our websites shall not be deemed to be part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Celtic-International-Fund-2019.Pdf
    CELTIC INTERNATIONAL FUND BBC ALBA (with funding from MG ALBA), S4C, TG4 and Northern Ireland Screen’s Irish Language Broadcast Fund (ILBF) are delighted to announce the second round of the ‘Celtic International Fund’, a yearly joint-commissioning round between the indigenous Celtic language television broadcasters and funders of Scotland, Wales, Ireland and Northern Ireland The aim of the ‘Celtic International Fund’ is to promote co-development and then co-production through Scottish Gaelic, Welsh and Irish, and to encourage a broader European and worldwide internationalisation of productions which are originally conceived in those Celtic languages. The Celtic International Fund hopes to provide film-makers with an opportunity to co-develop and coproduce distinctive, ambitious works to enrich primetime programme schedules, to have a national impact with audiences in the territories of Scotland, Wales, Ireland and Northern Ireland and seek to reach audiences worldwide. This call-out encompasses three genres, Factual, Formats and Drama. For all projects, we envisage a development phase where funding would be provided to develop ideas but also to develop the co- production framework which must have a production element in Scotland, Wales and either Ireland or Northern Ireland. Feedback from producers regarding genres to be included in ensuing Celtic International Fund call-outs is welcome. The Celtic International Fund will be administered by a joint commissioning team drawn from the Celtic language broadcasters and funders who are partners
    [Show full text]
  • European Public Service Broadcasting Online
    UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI, COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH CENTRE (CRC) European Public Service Broadcasting Online Services and Regulation JockumHildén,M.Soc.Sci. 30November2013 ThisstudyiscommissionedbytheFinnishBroadcastingCompanyǡYle.Theresearch wascarriedoutfromAugusttoNovember2013. Table of Contents PublicServiceBroadcasters.......................................................................................1 ListofAbbreviations.....................................................................................................3 Foreword..........................................................................................................................4 Executivesummary.......................................................................................................5 ͳIntroduction...............................................................................................................11 ʹPre-evaluationofnewservices.............................................................................15 2.1TheCommission’sexantetest...................................................................................16 2.2Legalbasisofthepublicvaluetest...........................................................................18 2.3Institutionalresponsibility.........................................................................................24 2.4Themarketimpactassessment.................................................................................31 2.5Thequestionofnewservices.....................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland: in Search of Reform for Public Service Media Funding
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ulster University's Research Portal Ireland: In search of reform for public service media funding Phil Ramsey, Ulster University [email protected] http://ulster.academia.edu/PhilRamsey | http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-489X Published as: Ramsey, P. (2018) Ireland: In search of reform for public service media funding. In C. Herzog, H. Hilker, L. Novy and Torun, O. (Eds), Transparency and Funding of Public Service Media: deutsche Debatte im internationalen Kontex (pp.77–90). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Abstract This chapter discusses public service media (PSM) in Ireland in the context of the recent financial crisis and major demographic changes. It considers some of the factors impacting domestic PSM that are similar to those in other mature media systems in Europe, such as declining funding streams and debates over PSM-funding reform. After introducing the Irish social and political-economic context and providing for a brief historical review of PSM in Ireland, the roles of the domestic PSM organizations RTÉ and TG4 in the Irish media market are discussed. The chapter addresses initial government support for the introduction of a German-style household media fee, a Public Service Broadcasting Charge. While the charge was intended for introduction in 2015, it was later ruled out by the Irish Government in 2016. Ireland: in search of reform for public service media funding Public Service Media (PSM) has a long-tradition in the Republic of Ireland (ROI, hereafter Ireland), dating back to the commencement of the state radio service 2RN in January 1926.1 The state’s involvement in broadcasting later gave way to the main public broadcaster RTÉ, which has broadcast simultaneously on television and radio since New Year’s Eve 1961, and latterly, delivered public service content online.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports and Financials As at 31 December 2015
    Financials Rai 2015 Reports and financials 2015 December 31 at as Financials Rai 2015 Reports and financials as at 31 December 2015 2015. A year with Rai. with A year 2015. Reports and financials as at 31 December 2015 Table of Contents Introduction 5 Rai Separate Financial Statements as at 31 December 2015 13 Consolidated Financial Statements as at 31 December 2015 207 Corporate Directory 314 Rai Financial Consolidated Financial Introduction Statements Statements 5 Introduction Corporate Bodies 6 Organisational Structure 7 Letter to Shareholders from the Chairman of the Board of Directors 8 Rai Financial Consolidated Financial Introduction 6 Statements Statements Corporate Bodies Board of Directors until 4 August 2015 from 5 August 2015 Chairman Anna Maria Tarantola Monica Maggioni Directors Gherardo Colombo Rita Borioni Rodolfo de Laurentiis Arturo Diaconale Antonio Pilati Marco Fortis Marco Pinto Carlo Freccero Guglielmo Rositani Guelfo Guelfi Benedetta Tobagi Giancarlo Mazzuca Antonio Verro Paolo Messa Franco Siddi Secretary Nicola Claudio Board of Statutory Auditors Chairman Carlo Cesare Gatto Statutory Auditors Domenico Mastroianni Maria Giovanna Basile Alternate Statutory Pietro Floriddia Auditors Marina Protopapa General Manager until 5 August 2015 from 6 August 2015 Luigi Gubitosi Antonio Campo Dall’Orto Independent Auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers Rai Financial Consolidated Financial Introduction Statements Statements 7 Organisational Structure (chart) Board of Directors Chairman of the Board of Directors Internal Supervisory
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Selection
    APOLLO 11: BACK ON THE MOON CODED BIAS KILLING PATIENT ZERO PICTURE A SCIENTIST APOLLO 11 : RETOUR SUR LA LUNE Written and directed by Shalini Kantayya Written and directed by Laurie Lynd Written and directed by Ian Cheney and Sharon Shattuck Directed by Charles-Antoine de Rouvre 85 min - US - 2020 100 min - Canada - 2019 Written by Sophie Bocquillon and Charles-Antoine de © 7th Empire Media © Fadoo Productions 97 min - US - 2020 Rouvre French Premiere In association with Fine Point Films © Uprising LLC In association with The Wonder Collaborative 96 min - France - 2019 French Premiere French Premiere © Grand Angle Productions - Groupe EDM Modern society sits at the intersection of two In association with Mediawan Thematics, Sveriges Scapegoated as “Patient Zero” at the center of Television, Al Arabya Channel, RSI, HRT Croatia, crucial questions: what does it mean when Picture A Scientist chronicles the groundswell TVP Poland, RTVS, SRF, Czech Television and artificial intelligence increasingly governs our the AIDS epidemic, Gaëtan Dugas was the France Télévisions liberties? And what are the consequences for handsome, openly gay French-Canadian flight of researchers who are writing a new chapter French broadcast: France 2, Toute l'Histoire the people AI is biased against? When MIT attendant characterized as singlehandedly for women scientists. Biologist Nancy Hopkins, Media Lab researcher Joy Buolamwini spreading AIDS to North America. In this chemist Raychelle Burks, and geologist Jane Willenbring lead viewers on a journey deep 16 July 1969. A rocket, carrying Apollo 11, sits discovers that most facial-recognition software riveting documentary, director Laurie Lynd sets into their own experiences in the sciences, on the launch pad at Cape Canaveral awaiting does not accurately identify darker-skinned out to dismantle this myth.
    [Show full text]
  • Must-Carry Rules, and Access to Free-DTT
    Access to TV platforms: must-carry rules, and access to free-DTT European Audiovisual Observatory for the European Commission - DG COMM Deirdre Kevin and Agnes Schneeberger European Audiovisual Observatory December 2015 1 | Page Table of Contents Introduction and context of study 7 Executive Summary 9 1 Must-carry 14 1.1 Universal Services Directive 14 1.2 Platforms referred to in must-carry rules 16 1.3 Must-carry channels and services 19 1.4 Other content access rules 28 1.5 Issues of cost in relation to must-carry 30 2 Digital Terrestrial Television 34 2.1 DTT licensing and obstacles to access 34 2.2 Public service broadcasters MUXs 37 2.3 Must-carry rules and digital terrestrial television 37 2.4 DTT across Europe 38 2.5 Channels on Free DTT services 45 Recent legal developments 50 Country Reports 52 3 AL - ALBANIA 53 3.1 Must-carry rules 53 3.2 Other access rules 54 3.3 DTT networks and platform operators 54 3.4 Summary and conclusion 54 4 AT – AUSTRIA 55 4.1 Must-carry rules 55 4.2 Other access rules 58 4.3 Access to free DTT 59 4.4 Conclusion and summary 60 5 BA – BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 61 5.1 Must-carry rules 61 5.2 Other access rules 62 5.3 DTT development 62 5.4 Summary and conclusion 62 6 BE – BELGIUM 63 6.1 Must-carry rules 63 6.2 Other access rules 70 6.3 Access to free DTT 72 6.4 Conclusion and summary 73 7 BG – BULGARIA 75 2 | Page 7.1 Must-carry rules 75 7.2 Must offer 75 7.3 Access to free DTT 76 7.4 Summary and conclusion 76 8 CH – SWITZERLAND 77 8.1 Must-carry rules 77 8.2 Other access rules 79 8.3 Access to free DTT
    [Show full text]
  • DPP Technical Delivery Standards
    TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR DELIVERY OF TELEVISION PROGRAMMES TO This document is a complete guide to the common technical standards agreed by the BBC, BTSport, Channel 4, Channel 5, ITV, Sky, S4C and TG4. The first three pages of this document outline parts of the specification that are unique to TG4. The main body of the document outlines the main DPP specification as adopted by all members. The Standards include: Technical Specifications, i.e. the technical production methods which must be used, and the parameters which all material must meet to be acceptable by the broadcasters. Picture and Sound Quality requirements, which also form a binding obligation on producers of material. Assessment of quality is by nature subjective, and is highly dependent on the nature of the programme. Some of the Quality Requirements are expressed in relative terms (“reasonable”, “not excessive” etc), and it will be necessary to make a judgement as to whether the quality expectations of the intended audience will be fulfilled, and whether the broadcaster will feel that value for money has been achieved. Delivery Requirements, which specify the form and layout of the programme material. Every programme submitted for transmission must satisfy a Quality Control process specified by the Broadcaster. Any programme failing the QC process on tape or file may be rejected and returned to the supplier for repair. Please ensure you are using the current version of this document, available at: http://www.tg4.ie/en/production/guidelines.html Technical Responsibility and Contacts TG4 is required to ensure that for all broadcast programmes technical quality is maintained to a satisfactory standard.
    [Show full text]
  • As of August 27Th COUNTRY COMPANY JOB TITLE
    As of August 27th COUNTRY COMPANY JOB TITLE AFGHANISTAN MOBY GROUP Director, channels/acquisitions ALBANIA TVKLAN SH.A Head of Programming & Acq. AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION Acquisitions manager AUSTRALIA FOXTEL Acquisitions executive AUSTRALIA SBS Head of Network Programming AUSTRALIA SBS Channel Manager Main Channel AUSTRALIA SBS Head of Unscripted AUSTRALIA SBS Australia Channel Manager, SBS Food AUSTRALIA SBS Television International Content Consultant AUSTRALIA Special Broadcast Service Director TV and Online Content AUSTRALIA SPECIAL BROADCASTING SERVICE CORPORATION Acquisitions manager (unscripted) AUSTRIA A1 TELEKOM AUSTRIA AG Head of Broadcast & SAT AUSTRIA A1 TELEKOM AUSTRIA AG Broadcast & SAT AZERBAIJAN PUBLIC TELEVISION & RADIO BROADCASTING AZERBAIJAN Director general COMPANY AZERBAIJAN PUBLIC TELEVISION & RADIO BROADCASTING AZERBAIJAN Head of IR COMPANY AZERBAIJAN PUBLIC TELEVISION & RADIO BROADCASTING AZERBAIJAN Deputy DG COMPANY AZERBAIJAN GAMETV.AZ PRODUCER CENTRE General director BELARUS MEDIA CONTACT Buyer BELARUS MEDIA CONTACT Ceo BELGIUM NOA PRODUCTIONS Ceo ‐ producer BELGIUM PANENKA NV Managing partner RTBF RADIO TELEVISION BELGE COMMUNAUTE BELGIUM Head of Acquisition Documentary FRANCAISE RTBF RADIO TELEVISION BELGE COMMUNAUTE BELGIUM Responsable Achats Programmes de Flux FRANCAISE RTBF RADIO TELEVISION BELGE COMMUNAUTE BELGIUM Buyer FRANCAISE RTBF RADIO TELEVISION BELGE COMMUNAUTE BELGIUM Head of Documentary Department FRANCAISE RTBF RADIO TELEVISION BELGE COMMUNAUTE BELGIUM Content acquisition
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Repo Rt 2010
    TUARASCÁIL BHLIANTÚIL 2010 TUARASCÁIL BHLIANTÚIL TG4 2010 03/06/2011 11:52 TG4 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 REPORT ANNUAL TG4 2010 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL Cludach 2010 FINAL.indd 1 SÚIL EILE ContEntS Mission, Vision & Core Values 3 TG4’s CoMMiTMenTs for 2010 5 Key TG4 PerforManCe HiGHliGHTs of 2010 8 THe Board of Teilifís na GaeilGe and oTHer inforMaTion 15 CHairMan’s rePorT 18 direCTor General’s rePorT 21 CorPoraTe GoVernanCe 26 finanCe reView 2010 28 finanCial sTaTeMenTs 30 TG4 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 1 Tuarascáil Béarla 2010 FINAL Singles.indd 1 03/06/2011 11:41 1916 Seachtar na CásCa 2 TG4 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 Tuarascáil Béarla 2010 FINAL Singles.indd 2 03/06/2011 11:41 SÚIL EILE “I thoroughly enjoyed the documentary series on the 1916 leaders from tG4, the best of the home based channels” Tuam Herald MISSIon, VISIon & CorE VaLuES 1916 SeaCHtar na CÁSCa Winner of 9 awards including: IFta Best Language Celtic Media: Best Documentary Series TG4’s mission is to provide an it works with its key stakeholders and Quality and Value-for-Money: attractive and innovative television overall reflect the principles which are and content service in Irish, that the founding characteristics of the To provide a high quality programme celebrates Irish creativity and identity organisation. The culture of the TG4 schedule. – language, culture, music and sport, organisation is built on these values. packaged and presented to be It is expected that each TG4 employee To operate a cost effective and accessible and appealing in order to lives these values day-to-day and uses efficient structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Pluralismo Sociale in Televisione
    IL PLURALISMO SOCIALE IN TELEVISIONE MARZO 2021 CRITERI METODOLOGICI PERIODO DI RILEVAZIONE 1-31 Marzo 2021 EMITTENTI MONITORATE Rai 1, Rai 2, Rai 3, Rai News 24, Rete 4, Canale 5, Italia 1, TgCom24, La7, La7d, TV8, Cielo, Sky Tg24, Nove PROGRAMMI MONITORATI Telegiornali e Programmi Extra-Tg DATI FORNITI DA GECA ITALIA S.r.l DIREZIONE CONTENUTI AUDIOVISIVI CRITERI METODOLOGICI 2 CRITERI METODOLOGICI Con l’espressione “pluralismo sociale” si intende far riferimento alla rappresentazione che i media - in questo caso le emittenti televisive nazionali - offrono delle diverse articolazioni sociali e culturali presenti nella società. Il monitoraggio del pluralismo sociale consiste nella rilevazione di tutti i soggetti che hanno spazio nei programmi televisivi (telegiornali e programmi diversi dai telegiornali). I soggetti del pluralismo sociale vengono classificati sulla base di un elenco tipologico costituito da 22 macro-categorie; ogni macro-categoria si articola in micro-categorie di soggetti tipologicamente omogenei. Tale elenco, definito dall’Autorità, viene sottoposto a verifica periodica e, ove necessario, aggiornato/modificato. Si riporta, di seguito, l’elenco delle categorie di soggetti. ELENCO DELLE CATEGORIE DEI SOGGETTI AGCOM 1. SOGGETTI SOVRANAZIONALI 3. SOGGETTI E ORGANI COSTITUZIONALI 4. ISTITUZIONI PUBBLICHE E ORGANISMI Onu, Nato Presidente della Repubblica INTERNAZIONALI Altri soggetti sovranazionali (es. OMS) Presidente del Senato Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni Diplomatici Vicepresidenti del Senato Antitrust Presidente della Camera Altre Autorità indipendenti e di garanzia 2. UNIONE EUROPEA Vicepresidenti della Camera Commissari straordinari Unione Europea Presidente del Consiglio Corpo Diplomatico Commissione Europea Governo/Ministri/Sottosegretari Istat, CNR, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, INPS, etc. Parlamento Europeo Corte Costituzionale Corte dei Conti Partiti e movimenti europei Commissioni (Parlamentari, giunte, etc.) Altro Consiglio Europeo Commissione Parlamentare di Vigilanza BCE Parlamento 5.
    [Show full text]