Maliau Basin Conservation Project. Zoological Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maliau Basin Conservation Project. Zoological Survey Danlced Management of Maliau Basin Conservation Area Sabah, Malaysia Maliau Basin Conservation Project Zoological Survey November 200 Author: Dr. Carl Traeholt NEPCon, Odensegade 4 B, Postbox 5102, DK 8100 Aarhus C, Denmark Phone: + 45 86180866 Fax: + 45 86181012 E-mail: [email protected] submitted by Carl Traeholt NEPCon Aarhus Denmark phone: 019-3521399 (mobile) email: [email protected] Duration: June -September 29th, 2000 March -June 30th, 2001 Table of contents List of a bb revia finns ~...~~ ~.. 4 1. Background :~ 5 2. Activities and results...~~...~..~.~.~..&A~ ~~ 6 2.1 Small mammals trapping : 6 2.2 Amphibian collection 9 2.3 Recording wildl~fe by camera trapping 10 2.4 Other mammal~pecies and monitoring routes 11 2.5 Birdob,~ervation /2 2.2.6 7 Otherslraining , 13 2.7.1 Species identification training 13 2.7.2 Data analysis workshop 15 2.7.3 Other training activities , , 15 3. Data analysis and interpretation 17 3.1 Big mammals ~ 17 3.1.1 Banteng, Bo~'.iavanicus 18 3.1.2 Elephants, Elephas maximus 19 3.1.3 Sambardeer, Cervus' unicolour 20 3.1.4 Bearded pig, ..f)'USscrofa 20 3.1.5 Barking deer,Mun~iiacu~' mun~iak andM atherodes " 21 3.1.6 Sun bear,Helarctos malayanus , 21 3.1.7 Clouded leopard, Nel?felis'nebulosa 22 3.2 Smail.mammaL~ ~ 22 3.2.1 Mustelids, civets, cats, otters and mongooses 23 3.2.2 Rats, squirrels and shrews , , , , ,., ,..23 3.2.2 Other captured species 25 4. 3.3Constraints Primates ...~.~.~~ ~ ~ ~...~ 28 4.1 General. con,~traint,~ , 28 4.24.3 CMTTOurism and development, 28 4.3.1 Priorities of transportation 29 4.3..2Facilities 29 4.44.4.1 Labour Transfer and replacement of staff 30 4.4.2 Staff and salary 30 ,.. 4.4.3 Language and books in English 30 4.4.4 Training courses 31 4.5 Reporting 0;[surveys' 31 Recorom e n da tio os 32 5.1 Future collServation area 32 5.35.2 B~fferHabitat zone corridor 33 34 5.4 Ecotouri~m development , 35 5.4.1 Buildings and other facilities 36 5.5 CMT -.future job per~pectives 36 5.6 Staffand incentive~' 37 5.6.1 Staff TOR 37 5.7 Poaching 38 5.7 }future research areas and topics 39 5.7.1 Camera Trapping 39 Refe re DCes 41. Annex 2: A small selection of species photographed with a utoma ti c sensor ca me ras 47 Annex 4: List of mammals recorded from surveys in Maliau Basin and adjacent area. 51 ~ 5. List of abbreviations CL Casual Labour CMT Conservation ManagementTrainee CTH Camel Trophy Hut DANCED Danish Cooperation for Environment and Development IUCN World Conservation Union lln. Jalan (road) MBCA Ma]iau Basin Conservation Area PA Protected Area PMG Project Management Group Sg. Sungai (river) TA lntemationa] technica] assistant TOR Tenns of reference 1. Background The original TOR for the TA in zoology was to assist in putting up an extensive monitoring program for MBCA, train local rangers in basic wildlife survey and identification as well as data analysis and finally carry out various wildlife surveys (Annex5). The first input started already in June 2000 and ended in September2000. The overall monitoring system was implemented and various activities such as workshops relevant to the Fauna Team and surveys were conducted. Photography workshop (Technical assistancereport no. 6) Progress report no. 1 for Zoology input (Technical assistancereport No.1) Tracks and spoor reading workshop (Monitoring report" 2001) Small mammal and amphibian trapping (Monitoring report, 2001). Monitoring and data samplingmethods workshop (Technical assistancereport, 2001) Simple data-analysesworkshop (Technical assistancereport, 2001) In the final duration of the zoology input, we have been very active in field in order to extract sufficientzoological data of the interior parts ofMBCA beforethe departureof the TA for zoology. This report presents the data collected from the entire input of the TA. In view of the overall managerial objectives of the project data are pooled and followed up with simple analysesin order to make it applicable for the PMG in their efforts to develop a long-term managementplan for MBCA. ~ 2. Activities and results The final input for the international zoology T A commenced on the 5thMarch and ended on the 31st May, 2001. During this time we conducted three (3) extensive surveys trips during which we made five plots for small mammalstrapping. )'$"" ~ - r"\ "'"...1 "" ,..'" 1. Pakis Camp. I ~~ 2. Strike Ridge and Camp 88 ~ " j. 3. Tembadau Valley, double plot --"' c ~.. (Fig. 1). c"":_~ \< ... During thesesurveys we focusedo~ r /~; -".. ,. \ :w.ip Trapping of small mam- ~ ~.. mals. ~~ "' ,:/ :i 2 Collecting amphibians. , B~~~'"f:A '.,~, ) ;~~- :1 Recording animals by "" \; _.~ camera traps. ~~ 4 Recording other t'..,..:o..,,~1 specIes. ",~~ 5. Birds. alley 6. Others. \ \ ..""",-'.' .., Furtheffilore, we put up several new 7~,,~..- ~ .' monitoring routes at each site and "~ .. finally, we concentrated on some Cl.rl-t.security Gate extra curricular activities which are nevertheless very important for the F.ig~re 1. Maliau Basin with the adjacent southern .dlstnct popularly known as "Tembadau Valley" (green rangers m the future. stipulated line). The red stars indicate survey plots carried out by the Fauna Team. One of the plots in While not in the field the rangers Tembadau Valley is only about 3,5 km from Agathis followed two workshops/courses. Camp where two previous surveys were carried out in 2000. Using Microsoft Excel for simple data storage and analysis. This workshop took place in Luasong Forestry Centre and lasted an initial two days and followed up with two I-day courses post survey trip. Identification, naming and tagging of specimenswas carried out on location every time new specimenswere captured. 2.1 Small mammals trapping An analysis of small mammal community and abundance was conducted in each of the survey sites by deploying at least 50 cage traps (40 x 15 x 20 cm) on the ground in a 105 x 105 meter large plot. Each trap was positioned in a grid system 15 meters apart. In Camp 88 and Tembadau Valley we also deployed at least 10 tree traps. In each camp we further deployed at least 10 traps around the respective campsite. .n..."~Jmammal Table 1. The species caught during surveys in Maliau Basin and Tembadau Valley. There were 113 individuals representing 21 species from seven families. porcupine 'richys .fasciculafa:\;. Haeromvs mar1!arettae ' mouse Chestnut b~llied spiny rat,,Whitehead's Max()mys ochraceiventer rat Maxomvswhiteheadi Ked spiny Tat suriferc .,Maxomys !own spiny rat -~ raiah -~ spiny rat s baeodon~iviventer Dark tailed tree rat cremoriventer mo~- rat Wiviventer~apit Malavsianfield rat Rattus tiommlicus Polynesianrat '"7 ~omLong-tailedRaneeLonp;-tailedHattu.\'SmallMaxomys Traps were left for 8 days (Pakis Camp and Strike Ridge) and 10 40 days (Camp 88 and Tembadau Valley) and checked at least once 35 per day. Combined with the 30 surveys in 20001 (double plot in III 'Strike Ridge ~25 Agathis Camp, 10 days) this :J Q. 'Ca~88 consists of a total of 3162 trap tV "20 ~ Sawang 1 nights. This is 5 times as many as II C .Sawang 2 the total of the previous surveys () 15 Z put together2. Furthermore, the previous two surveys concentrat-ed 10 on only one site respectively, 5 namely Camel Trophy and Bambangan. In addition, one of 0 2 3 4 the weakest points of e.g. the L ~-- 5 6 1 8 9 10 nme (days) survey carried out in 1.998 (Gasis , et al., 1.998) is ~hat they h~:e only Figure 2. The cumulative number of new trappings as a left theIr traps m one posItion for function of time at four destinations in MBCA. Notice that 3-4 consecutive days. Although there is a general tendency of few trappings during the this does not entirely explain a first 2-3 days. Not.e also that no.ne of th~ trapping efforts very low trapping success there is have reach a pomt of saturation albeit C~mp 88 and , Sawang 1 & 2 appears to approach saturatIOn whereas no ~ou~t that thes: data are Strike Ridge still increases drastically. Hence it would heavily blased- According to many have been appropriate to continue trapping at Pakis previous surveys one should Camp for another 2-4 days.. expect a latency time of up to 3-4 c~ days before the first individual 401 i New enters a trap (Lundahl & Olsson, Recaptll'es 2000; Traeholt, 1999; Anan et al., ~~ 1998). Trap shy animals such as ro many rat species in areas unfamiliar with human presence 21.25'" j are reluctant to enter traps "C ;S3> immediately after it is deployed .5 0 and the disturbance created by z 15 cutting the grid of the plot 10 combined with the scent of human beings combine to create this 5 effect. This was also clearly 1) demonstrated in some of the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 present survey plots (Fig. 2). TillE (days) ...Figure 3. Capture rate as a function days at Strike A1t~m~t1vely, It IS necessary to Ridge. When "recapture" crosses "new" it is appropriate maIntaIn the traps deployed for at to terminate the trapping session. It is likely to have least 8-10 days or preferably even occurred at day 10-12 in this occasion. I Belian Cantp survey has bccn omi11cddue 10inconsis1cncy in trapping procedure. 11was rcporlcd by tho CTM to be due to a flooded Maliau River. 2 The total of the previous trapping efforts is 764 trap niKhts. It is based on Paine's 1988 expedition (284 trap nights) and Gasis' 19% survey (480 trap nights). 0 more.
Recommended publications
  • Toadally Frogs Frog Wranglers
    Toadally Frogs Frog Wranglers P rogram Theme: • Frogs are toadally awesome! P rogram Messages: • Frogs are remarkable creatures • A frogs ability to adapt to its environment is evident in it physiology • Frogs are extremely sensitive to their surroundings and as a result are considered to be an indicator species P rogram Objectives: • Gallery Participants will observe live frogs face-to-face • Gallery Participants will be able to describe several physical features and unique qualities of the White’s tree frog • Gallery Participants will get excited about frogs Frog Wrangling Procedure 1. Wash and dry your hands. You may use regular tap water and light soap, but insure that you rinse your hands thoroughly. 2. Move frog from the Public Programs suite into carrying case. Whenever you transport your frog from the Public Programs suite to the exhibit, please carefully remove them from the habitat terrarium and place them in the small red carrying case (cooler). This will prevent the animal from becoming stressed as it is moved through the Museum. 3. Prepare your audience. Prior to bring out the live frog, ensure that everyone is seated and that you have asked your audience not to move quickly. Sit on the floor as well; this will ensure that if the frog leaps from your hands, it would not have far to fall. 4. Wet your hands. When you are ready to show the frog as part of your demonstration, please moisten your hands with the spray bottle. This will help minimize your dry skin from sucking the moisture out of the frog.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Account
    SPECIES ACCOUNT AMPHIBIA I. Family MEGOPHRYIDAE Megophrys acera s Horned Frog This was a leaf litter frog, which inhabited forest floor of closed-canopy evergreen forests at Gunung Tujuh. It occurs from the lowlands at about 750 meters asl up to mountain forests over 1500 meters asl (Mistar, 2003). At Gunung Tujuh it was found at elevation 1200 meters asl. This is a rare species, which was only found at Gunung Tujuh survey site. This species is known from Peninsular Thailand through most of Peninsular Malaysia (Berry, 1975) and Sumatra (Mistar, 2003). Figure 21. M. aceras from Gunung Tujuh (Photograph by J. Holden). Megophrys nasuta Bornean Horned Frog, Malayan Horned Frog, Horned Toad, Large Horned Frog It was a leaf litter frog, which inhabited intact lowland and sub mountain rainforest, generally near forest streams. Adults are terrestrial in habits, but tadpoles live in clear forest streams. It occurred about 500 meters asl up to 1000 meters asl. It was regularly encountered, and its characteristic call was frequently heard in suitable habitat. It was uncommon in Tapan, Lumayang, Sungai Durian, Muara Kambang, Muara Sako, Muara Labuh and Lubuk Selasih survey sites. This species is known from southern, throughout Peninsular Malaysia (Berry, 1975), Tioman Island, Singapore (Lim and Lim, 1992), Sumatra, Bintan, all parts of Borneo and the Natuna Islands (Inger and Stuebing, 2005; Mistar, 2003). Figure 22. M. nasuta from Tapan (Photograph by J. Holden). Megophrys paralella Megophrys paralella was described by Inger and Iskandar (2005). Type locality of the species is Lubuk Selasih, West Sumatra, at elevation 1289 meters asl.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites
    Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites (SIS) – 2017 version Available for download from http://www.eaaflyway.net/about/the-flyway/flyway-site-network/ Categories approved by Second Meeting of the Partners of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership in Beijing, China 13-14 November 2007 - Report (Minutes) Agenda Item 3.13 Notes for compilers: 1. The management body intending to nominate a site for inclusion in the East Asian - Australasian Flyway Site Network is requested to complete a Site Information Sheet. The Site Information Sheet will provide the basic information of the site and detail how the site meets the criteria for inclusion in the Flyway Site Network. When there is a new nomination or an SIS update, the following sections with an asterisk (*), from Questions 1-14 and Question 30, must be filled or updated at least so that it can justify the international importance of the habitat for migratory waterbirds. 2. The Site Information Sheet is based on the Ramsar Information Sheet. If the site proposed for the Flyway Site Network is an existing Ramsar site then the documentation process can be simplified. 3. Once completed, the Site Information Sheet (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Flyway Partnership Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the Information Sheet and, where possible, digital versions (e.g. shapefile) of all maps. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Sabah's Mammals Tour
    Sabah’s Mammals Tour Destination s: Kinabatangan River, Tabin, Danum Valley, Deramakot: Sabah, Borneo Duration: 16 Days Dates: 12th August – 17th August 2017 Over 56 hours spotlighting in Borneo’s rainforests and seeing many species An amazing hour spent watching a herd of Elephants feeding on the side of the river An incredible Marbled Cat sighting grooming an looking at us at eye level for 5 mins Wonderful primate and bird filled cruising up and down the Kinabatangan River All 8 species of Hornbills and endemics such as Blue-headed Pita and Bristlehead Taken on rivers and through forests by expert guides such as spotting maestro Mike An incredible and record breaking total of 62 species of mammals sighted Seeing over 20 species of reptiles, including a Bornean keeled green pit-viper Spotting over 110 species of birds in total with many raptors & owls observed Watching a large flanged male Orangutan feeding close by on the Kinabatangan Tour Leader / Guides Overview Martin Royle (Royle Safaris Tour Leader) Ran & Rafai (Driver) Days 1-3: Kinabatangan River Aslan (Kinabatangan Guide) Gee (Kinabatangan Boat Driver) Days 4-5: Tabin Wildlife Mawi (Tabin Guide) Sanctuary Pondi (Tabin Driver) Adzil (Danum Valley Guide) Days 6-8: Danum Valley Ruslan (Danum Valley Driver) Mike (Deramakot Guide) Days 9-14: Deramakot Romeo (Deramakot Driver) Reserve Participants Day 15: Sandakan Mr. Monty Ross Miss. Jessica Ross Day 16: Sepilok Ms. April Brunelle Ms. Bobbie Borowski Royle Safaris – 6 Greenhythe Rd, Heald Green, Cheshire, SK8 3NS – 0845 226 8259 – [email protected] Day by Day Breakdown Overview Borneo is without a question one of the most biodiverse and wildlife rich locations in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Kinabalu & the Rainforests of Borneo's Orang-Utans
    Mount Kinabalu & the Rainforests of Borneo's Orang-utans Naturetrek Tour Report 19 September – 8 October 2014 Oriental Pied Hornbill, Sukau Western Tarsier, Sepilok Bornean Angle-headed Dragon, Danum Valley File-eared Frog, Danum Valley Report & Images compiled by Terry Reis Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Mount Kinabalu & the Rainforests of Borneo Tour Leaders: Terry Reis Naturetrek Osman Assan Local Guide Participants: Jonas Christiansen Brian Davies Diana Davies Gail Marsden Garry Rowe Sue Wild Bill Wild Stephen Woodham Day 1 Friday 19th September Outbound to Kuala Lumpur Six participants travelled from London, departing from Heathrow on a mid-day Malaysian Airlines flight to Kuala Lumpur, a journey of about 12 hours. Day 2 Saturday 20th September Outbound to Kuala Lumpur and onward to Kota Kinabalu Weather: Hot and humid, with rain during the drive to Kinabalu National Park, then fine All participants travelled from Kuala Lumpur, with Brian and Diana on a different flight. Everyone arrived in Kota Kinabalu, the capital of the Malaysian province of Sabah, by 12.30 (local time). Osman and I were waiting outside the baggage hall. We travelled by minibus to the main gate to Kinabalu (National) Park, a journey of about two hours. The rain during our ascent cleared sufficiently that we walked part of the bitumen road in the park, to get acquainted with some montane bird species. Almost immediately we found a mixed species flock of at least eight species, including Bornean endemics; Black-sided Flowerpecker, Bornean Whistler and Chestnut- hooded Laughingthrush.
    [Show full text]
  • Gopherus Agassizii (Agassiz's Desert Tortoise) - Attempted Predation
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282860818 Natural History Notes: Gopherus agassizii (Agassiz's Desert Tortoise) - Attempted Predation. Article in Herpetological Review · September 2015 CITATION READS 1 189 3 authors, including: Jeremy Mack Kristin Highberg Berry United States Geological Survey United States Geological Survey 15 PUBLICATIONS 133 CITATIONS 86 PUBLICATIONS 1,875 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Short- and long-term changes in Mojave Desert vegetation after disturbance View project Conservation genetics of Gopherus View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jeremy Mack on 15 October 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. NATURAL HISTORY NOTES 407 NATURAL HISTORY NOTES CAUDATA — SALAMANDERS lodged dragonfly naiad deeper into the digestive tract. Although dragonfly naiads are very common in ponds and similar areas AMBYSTOMA VELASCI (Plateau Tiger Salamander). MORTAL- where A. velasci is present, it still remains to be studied what pro- ITY. Ambystoma velasci is a salamander endemic to Mexico, and portions of them occur in the diet of A. velasci. has been reported to feed on any vertebrates and invertebrates Special thanks are due to Efrén Hernández-Navarro and José that can possibly be swallowed (Lemos-Espinal and Dixon 2013. Antonio Corona for their assistance in the field, and to Larry Da- Amphibians and Reptiles of San Luis Potosí. Eagle Mountain vid Wilson for the improvement of this note. Publishing, LC, Eagle Mountain, Utah. 300 pp.), including con- ADRIAN LEYTE-MANRIQUE, Laboratorio de Biología, Departamento specifics (Vite-Silva et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Survey at Gold Mining Exploitation Area of Pt Natarang Mining, Way Linggo Project Tanggamus District, Lampung Province, Sumatera
    FAUNA SURVEY AT GOLD MINING EXPLOITATION AREA OF PT NATARANG MINING, WAY LINGGO PROJECT TANGGAMUS DISTRICT, LAMPUNG PROVINCE, SUMATERA By Dr Jarwadi B. Hernowo Sasikirono Siregar PT INTERTEK UTAMA SERVICES 2011 FAUNA SURVEY AT GOLD MINING EXPLOITATION AREA OF PT NATARANG MINING, WAY LINGGO PROJECT TANGGAMUS DISTRICT, LAMPUNG PROVINCE, SUMATERA By Dr Jarwadi B. Hernowo Sasikirono Siregar INTRODUCTION Background PT. NATARANG MINING (NM) is one of company which held at gold mining exploitation project at Way Linggo, Tanggamus, Lampung. PT MN has licensed area statement of exploration approximately 10 524 ha, but area which has been permitted as exploitation around 39.21 ha at Way Linggo, Wonosobo Sub District, Tanggamus District. PT NM has concerned to minimize negative impact on environmental issue for developing of the property. The NM started with fauna survey at the project area to collect information and data in relation to fauna present and the status since beginning of the exploration project. To develop positive impact on exploitation of gold mining at the property is not only make technical and economic orientated, but also ecological reasons. From beginning state of exploitation planning, PT NM will comply with all regulations are used in Indonesia such as the biodiversity convention regarding to high biodiversity value of the exploration area. Objective of the Study The fauna survey at the exploitation area of PT NM at Way Linggo, Wonosobo sub district, Tanggamus district is to gain 1. Basic information and data are related with species diversity of wildlife at the site area 2. Local distribution and abundances of wildlife at exploitation area of PT NM 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency
    Species Management in Aquatic Habitats Compendium of project outputs -Species Action Plans and Management Guidelines Research and Development Project Record Wl/i64013iM ENVIRONMENT AGENCY All pulps used in production of this paper is sourced from sustainable managed forests and are elemental chlorine free and wood free Species Management in AquaticHabitats. Compendium of Project Outputs - Species Action Plans and Management Guidelines Project Record Wl/i640/3/M C P Mainstone (Editor) Research Contractor:- WRC plc Further copies of this report are available from:. : Environment Agency R&D Dissemination Centre, c/o WRc, Frankland Road, Swindon, Wilts SN5 SYF ,I, W?C tel: 01793-865000 fax: 01793-514562 e-mail: [email protected] Publishing Organisation: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West Almondsbury Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 ISBNMD-06/98-B-BCPE 0 Environment Agency 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Environment Agency. Its officers, servant or agents accept no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage arising from the interpretation or use of the information, or reliance upon views contained herein. Dissemination status Internal: Released to Regions External: Released to the Public Domain Statement of use This report contains information to guide the operational and promotional works of the Agency by identifying potential impacts upon, and enhancements for, species of conservation concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Biological Environment
    9 Existing Biological Environment 9.1 Introduction This section describes the existing biological components in the study area which include the typical flora, wildlife, fishery resources, birds and other animals. The description is based on data collected from the field supplemented by available published and unpublished data, interviews with local residents and relevant authorities. The flora and fauna composi- tion of the study area was surveyed to assess the potential impacts of the proposed project implementation on the biological system, especially those components recognized as having some conservation and/or socio-economic value. Field samplings were augmented by cross references with other surveys and studies carried out in the area. In this study, emphasis was given primarily on higher plants and animals. Study surveys were conducted to achieve the following objectives: a) To describe the flora and fauna of the proposed project site and its surrounding areas. b) To assess and identify the impact of the proposed STP2 reclamation project on biologi- cal organisms, terrestrial flora and fauna. c) To propose proper mitigation measures that are suitable to minimize the prescribed im- pacts. The impacts and measures shall be further discussed in Chapter 11 . ng (Phase DevelopmentII) (STP2), Penang 9.2 Flora 9.2.1 General Study Background The study method implemented here was the transect survey, whereby the researchers docu- mented the typical and dominant species encountered in the study area. Apart from photo- graphic records, samples of unidentified species were also taken back to the UKM herbar- ium for further taxonomic identification. The results are shown in Table 9.1 and Photos 9.1 to 9.25 .
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Checklist of the Amphibian Diversity of Maliau Basin
    Evolutionary Systematics 2 2018, 89–114 | DOI 10.3897/evolsyst.2.27020 An updated checklist of the amphibian diversity of Maliau Basin Conservation Area, Sabah, Malaysia Alexander Haas1, Kueh Boon-Hee2, Alvinus Joseph2, Masliadi bin Asri3, Indraneil Das4, Reto Hagmann5, Loraine Schwander6, Stefan T. Hertwig5,6 1 Centrum für Naturkunde, Universität Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany 2 Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia 3 Maliau Basin Conservation Area, Pusat Kraftangan Sabah, Peti Surat 961, 89008 Keningau, Sabah, Malaysia 4 Institute for Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia 5 Naturhistorisches Museum Bern, Bernastraße 15, Ch-3005 Bern, Switzerland 6 Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland http://zoobank.org/1E21338D-E8BB-4961-B7E9-7350D3156B4C Corresponding author: Alexander Haas ([email protected]) Abstract Received 28 May 2018 Accepted 4 July 2018 The current account presents the results of a 14-day amphibian survey at Maliau Basin Published 13 July 2018 Conservation Area (MBCA). With a total of approximately 170 man-hrs, 44 species were detected at four study sites during the field period; four more species were later discov- Academic editor: ered outside the two-week campaign. The results are compared to the results of previous Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa surveys. Apart from adults, we present the first photographic documentation of the larval stages of Chiromantis inexpectatus and Bornean Phrynoidis juxtaspera, along with a brief tadpole description; the better-known tadpoles of four more species were recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Download from And
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/doc/ris/key_ris_e.doc and http://www.ramsar.org/pdf/ris/key_ris_e.pdf Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as am ended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 17, 4th edition). 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection GPO Box 2454, Brisbane, QLD 4001 Designation date Site Reference Number Ph: +61 7 137 468 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: 1 January 2014 3. Country: Australia 4. Name of the Ramsar site: The precise name of the designated site in one of the three official languages (English, French or Spanish) of the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 Version
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/doc/ris/key_ris_e.doc and http://www.ramsar.org/pdf/ris/key_ris_e.pdf Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as am ended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 17, 4th edition). 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection GPO Box 2454, Brisbane, QLD 4001 Designation date Site Reference Number Ph: +61 7 137 468 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: 1 January 2014 3. Country: Australia 4. Name of the Ramsar site: The precise name of the designated site in one of the three official languages (English, French or Spanish) of the Convention.
    [Show full text]