DOCSLIB.ORG

Landover Alternative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landover Alternative 6.0 Landover Alternative Chapter 6 describes existing conditions of the Figure 6- 1: Landover Conceptual Site Plan affected environment and identifies the environmental consequences associated with the consolidation of the FBI HQ at the Landover site. A detailed description of ¨¦§495 the methodologies employed to evaluate impacts for BRIGHTSEAT ROAD ¨¦§95 each resource and the relevant regulatory framework is given in chapter 3, Methodology. The Landover site consists of approximately 80 acres of vacant land located near the intersection of Brightseat Road and Landover Road in Prince George’s County, Maryland. It is bound on the north by Evarts Street, on the east by the Capital Beltway, on the south by Landover Road, and on the west by TRUCK & EVARTS STREET SECONDARY Brightseat Road. Previously, the site was home to the TRUCK VEHICULAR SCREENING GATE Landover Mall, which operated between 1972 and REMOTE DELIVERY 2002. As of December 2014, all facilities associated FACILITY with Landover Mall have been demolished, and only STANDBY SUBSTATION GENERATORS the surface parking lot and retaining walls remain MAIN LANDOVER ROAD VEHICULAR GATE CENTRAL UTILITY WOODMORE TOWNE CENTRE on-site. Commercial uses in proximity to the site (EXIT ONLY) PLANT MAPLE RIDGE include Woodmore Towne Centre, located across the EMPLOYEE Capital Beltway (Interstate [I]-95) to the east, and the APARTMENTS PARKING Arena Plaza Shopping Center. South of Landover VISITOR CENTER Road. West of the site along Brightseat Road is the VISITOR PARKING 202 Maple Ridge apartment complex, while H.P. Johnson Park, additional apartment and single-family residential communities are located north of the site. FedExField EMPLOYEE MAIN HQ BUILDING PARKING football stadium is located approximately three- VEHICULAR GATE DEVELOPABLE (ENTRANCE ONLY) quarters of a mile to the southwest of the site. AREA PERIMETER The analysis of environmental impacts for the Landover FENCE Alternative is based on the conceptual site plan shown in Figure 6-1. This site plan is informed by both site planning principles and design requirements based on SOUTH FBI program needs. These site plans are conceptual VEHICULAR GATE in nature and represent a program-compliant layout (EXIT ONLY) that would yield the most conservative estimate of the environmental impacts associated with each alternative. Ultimately, the layout and design of the proposed FBI HQ could potentially be altered during the final design ARENA PLAZA process with the selected exchange partner. GSA would SHOPPING CENTER perform supplemental NEPA analysis, as necessary, if there is substantial variance from what is considered in this EIS. U.S. General Services Administration 353 FBI Headquarters Consolidation Draft Environmental Impact Statement 6.1 Affected Environment The following sections describe the Affected 6.1.1.1 Geology and Topography LANDOVER EARTH RESOURCES AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT OVERVIEW Environment for the Landover site and associated • The topography of the site slopes downward to the north with an elevation of approximately study areas at each resource topic evaluated in this The topography of the site slopes downward slightly to 180 feet AMSL along the southern-most boundary by Landover Road to approximately 100 feet Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). the north with an elevation of approximately 180 feet AMSL along Evarts Street to the north. above mean sea level (AMSL) along the southern- most boundary by Landover Road to approximately • The Landover site is classified as typical of the Upper CretaceousAge Brightseat-Severn 6.1.1 Earth Resources 100 feet AMSL along Evarts Street to the north, as Formation as detailed in the Geologic Map of Prince George’s County, Maryland. shown in figure 6-2. Localized moderate to steep The following sections describe the affected environment slopes, associated with regrading that occurred to • USDA-NRCS has identified six major soil associations within the Landover site, including Urban for earth resources for the Landover site. Earth resources accommodate the construction and operation of Land-Russet-Christiana Complex, Urban Land-Adelphia Complex, Urban Land-Collington encompass geology, topography, and soils. West, Adelphia-Holmdel-Urban Land Complex, Christiana-Downer-Urban Land Complex, and the Landover Mall, are located along the remaining Collington-Wist-Urban Land Complex. foundation of the demolished mall buildings. Demolition debris exists in piles throughout the site and further contribute to variations in topography on this site. FACIES A body of rock with specified characteristics. AMSL Above mean sea level (AMSL) is the average level for the surface of one or more of Earth’s oceans from which heights such as elevations may be measured. Example of manmade grades remaining from construction and demolition of Landover Mall PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE A geographic region with a characteristic geomorphology and often specific subsurface rock type or structural elements. U.S. General Services Administration 354 FBI Headquarters Consolidation Draft Environmental Impact Statement The geology of the Landover site is typical of the Figure 6- 2: Landover Topography Figure 6- 3: Physiographic Provinces of the National Figure 6- 4: Landover Geology Overview Upper Cretaceous Age Brightseat-Severn Formation Capital Region as detailed in the Geologic Map of Prince George’s County, Maryland. Minerals within this formation t consist of gray to medium gray, poorly sorted s S Evart ¦¨§95 fine-grained sand that directly underlies on-site 95 ¦¨§270 M A R Y soils. The base of the Brightseat-Severn Formation L A V I N may contain localized clusters of small pebbles, 495 R G I N D I A phosphorous clasts, and fossilized shark teeth. The Brightseat Rd Brightseat-Severn Formation is estimated to be approximately 50 feet thick in the vicinity of the site WASHINGTON ¤£50 495 ¦¨§ D.C. and directly overlies the sand and gravel facies of Capital Beltway ^ Landover ¤£50 the Potomac Group (Glaser 2003). The Potomac Site ¦¨§66 Group is Lower Cretaceous in age and consists ¦¨§495 §395 §295 of the undifferentiated Patapsco, Arundel, and L ¦¨ ¦¨ ¦¨§95 an do ¤£301 Patuxent Formations. In the vicinity of the site, the ver Potomac Group is composed of white to yellow-brown Rd 202 £1 interbedded quartz sand and silty clay lenses. The ¤ Potomac Group is estimated to be more than 200 Tkbs Brightseat Severn Formation ¦¨§95 feet thick for areas underlying the site (Glaser 2003). Qt Terrace Deposits General geological attributes, including attributes of 2 ft contours Kps Sand-gravel facies the Atlantic Coastal Plain physiographic province are 0 500 1,000 212 ft AMSL Kpc Silt-clay facies described in sections 5.1.1. Figure 6-3 illustrates the Feet Coastal Plain 0 7.5 15 location of the Landover site within the Coastal Plain 1 in = 1,000 feet Piedmont Province I Miles Adapted from Geologic Map of Prince George’s County Physiographic Province, and figure 6-4 illustrates the Sources: 1 in = 13.5 miles 82 ft AMSL ESRI (2013), GSA (2013), DC GIS (2013), USGS (2008) geology of the Landover site and its environs. Sources: ESRI (2013), GSA (2013), DC GIS (2013) U.S. General Services Administration 355 FBI Headquarters Consolidation Draft Environmental Impact Statement Table 6-1: Landover Site Soil Characteristics 6.1.1.2 Soils The potential of erosion for soil types is Water demonstrated using the , Acres Wind Drainage The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) erosion K factor Slopes Erosion Building which indicates the susceptibility of a soil to Soil Type within Erosion and flooding Hydric Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) (percent) Factor potential erosion by water. K values range from 0.02 Site Factor potential have identified six major soil associations within the (K factor) to 0.69. All other factors being equal, the Landover site, as shown in table 6-1 and figure 6-5. higher the value, the more susceptible the Moderately The vast majority of the site has been previously soil is to erosion by water. Urban well-drained developed and 90 percent of the site is currently land-Russet- 29 0 - 5 N/A N/A N/A and nearly No impervious surfaces. Each of the site soil associations Christiana complex zero flooding include an urban land component, meaning the soils potential have been or are currently altered by development. Moderately None of the soils identified at the site are considered Urban well-drained highly erodible soils nor are any of the soils considered land-Adelphia 17 0 – 5 N/A N/A N/A and nearly Yes to be prime farmland (USDA 2015a). The potential complex zero flooding of erosion for soil types is demonstrated using the potential erosion K factor, which indicates the susceptibility of Well-drained a soil to erosion by water. K values range from 0.02 Urban and nearly to 0.69. All other factors being equal, the higher the land-Collington- 27 0 – 5 N/A N/A N/A No zero flooding value, the more susceptible the soil is to erosion by Wist complex potential water. Susceptibility of soils to wind erosion is detailed using a wind erodibility group rating system, in which Moderately soils are assigned to a number ranging from 1 to 8, Adelphia-Holmdel- well-drained with soils assigned to group 1 having the greatest Urban land 6 0 – 5 0.37 3 Very limited and nearly No susceptibility to wind erosion and those in group 8 complex zero flooding being the least susceptible. From west to east, soil potential associations are as follows: Moderately Christiana- well-drained Urban Land-Russet-Christiana Complex Downer-Urban 1 5 – 15 0.49 6 Very limited and nearly No land complex zero flooding The Urban Land-Russet-Christiana Complex is located potential along the western site boundary and central portion Well-drained of the site and comprises 36 percent of the site. This Collington-Wist- and nearly soil complex consists primarily of fine sandy loam Urban land 4 5 – 15 0.20 3 Very limited No zero flooding and sandy clay loam and is typically located along complex potential interstream divides and swales, with slopes ranging from 0 to 5 percent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metro Directions to Fedex Field
    Metro Directions To Fedex Field Mario is domestically dichasial after delusional Felicio unruffling his argumentations trustfully. Is Flinn always confidential and neurobiological when phagocytoses some night-robe very languishingly and fundamentally? Unreadable and philological Roger interposing her aversion ensile while Barnett scowls some diluent terminably. We even in town center, redskins stadium is i came up by levy restaurants website: through regional destination or to field for a car comes with more details to uppercase the Another street names to metro directions to fedex field. The directions to fedex field action by metro directions to fedex field! Getting to Audi Field DC United. Please input your drives to uber drop us at waze to support and directions to metro lines were going on your guest relations and. Google metro directions are way the easiest for each to use. Fedexfield Parking And Directions Washington Redskins Redskins with fedex field seating chart u2 Saved by Seating Chart Buy Tickets OnlineMetro. Metro Stop Tenleytown AU also called Tenley Circle metropolitan Line Employee Entrance Glass. Don't miss your beautiful 2BR 25BA townhome within walking beside of FedEx field and Morgan Blvd Metro Station Modern. Priceline to you chose to your city under any products or services booth inside with advance ten rows back then use our support and directions to find produce in an elevator towers last few tips below are. Will Bengals allow fans? State university as part of. Fans want to metro directions to fedex field without notice and directions from across the field visit our company over the concert caters to.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue: Shopping Malls Shopping Malls
    Issue: Shopping Malls Shopping Malls By: Sharon O’Malley Pub. Date: August 29, 2016 Access Date: October 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1177/237455680217.n1 Source URL: http://businessresearcher.sagepub.com/sbr-1775-100682-2747282/20160829/shopping-malls ©2021 SAGE Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ©2021 SAGE Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Can they survive in the 21st century? Executive Summary For one analyst, the opening of a new enclosed mall is akin to watching a dinosaur traversing the landscape: It’s something not seen anymore. Dozens of malls have closed since 2011, and one study predicts at least 15 percent of the country’s largest 1,052 malls could cease operations over the next decade. Retail analysts say threats to the mall range from the rise of e-commerce to the demise of the “anchor” department store. What’s more, traditional malls do not hold the same allure for today’s teens as they did for Baby Boomers in the 1960s and ’70s. For malls to remain relevant, developers are repositioning them into must-visit destinations that feature not only shopping but also attractions such as amusement parks or trendy restaurants. Many are experimenting with open-air town centers that create the feel of an urban experience by positioning upscale retailers alongside apartments, offices, parks and restaurants. Among the questions under debate: Can the traditional shopping mall survive? Is e-commerce killing the shopping mall? Do mall closures hurt the economy? Overview Minnesota’s Mall of America, largest in the U.S., includes a theme park, wedding chapel and other nonretail attractions in an attempt to draw patrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017-2018
    EXCELLENCEANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 IMPACT SUCCESS MESSAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 PRESIDENT’S 2019–2021 Strategic Plan ....................................4 PATHWAYS Culinary Arts Center Opening ....................5 Prince George’s Community College now offers 10 academic Lanham Hall Opening ................................................6 pathways to degrees, certificates, Extension Centers ........................................................20 licensures, workforce trainings, and professional development. Financial Reports .......................................................... 28 Page 11 PGCC Foundation ..........................................................30 Grants ................................................................................................ 32 Donors .............................................................................................. 34 FRONT COVER Drs. Anthony T. Fulton and Thomisha M. Duru are two of the many faculty featured throughout the college in recognition of the great value and talent of our vast array of educators. MESSAGE PRESIDENT’S Prince George’s Community Their hard work and College (PGCC) had an exemplary dedication continue to receive year and set the tone for how the college honorable recognition, including receiving intends to support student success and address the highest rating on the Maryland State the region’s most pertinent needs. Thanks to the Department of Education 2018–2019 Maryland School leadership and collaborative efforts of our Board of Trustees, Report Card.
    [Show full text]
  • News and Notes Prince George's County J § 'W
    News and Notes Prince George's County J § 'W . CO , Historical Society ! = = 3 e 'MaritlU' February 1997 Our 45th Year Volume XXV Number 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1997 President - Jane Eagen Directors 1997-1999 Past Presidents Vice President - Eugene Roberts, Jr. Mildred Ridgeley Gray John Giannetti Secretary - Sarah Bourne Melinda Alter Paul T. Lanham Treasurer - John Bourne Katherine Clagett Warren Rhoads Historian - Frederick DeMarr Directors 1996-1998 W.C. (Bud) Button Editor - Sharon Howe Sweeting Julie Bright Joyce MacDonald John Mitchell William Uber Illustration by Fred H. Greenberg from Washington Itself by E. J. Applewhite, 1986 JOIN US on SATURDAY, MARCH 8 at 2:00 pm at the Glenn Dale Community Center Mr David J. Danelski, Supreme Court Historian, will speak on Sons of Maryland on the United States Supreme Court: Thomas Johnson, Samuel Chase, Gabriel Duvall, Roger Brooke Taney and Thurgood Marshall. Mr. Danelski has researched, taught and written extensively about the United States Supreme Count. He will share little know stories and attempt to undo some popular misconceptions about these men. We have invited the members of the Duvall Society to join us for this celebration of Gabriel Duvall. The reception following the program will be at Marietta, home of Gabriel Duvall. FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK Happy New Year. You will notice on the cover the new/old Board of Directors of the Historical Society and an announcement of the meeting on Saturday, March 8 (2:00 pm, Glenn Dale Community Center) on "Sons of Maryland on the United States Supreme Court." This issue begins with the continuation of a column called Meet the Meet the Board Board written by Secretary Sarah Bourne.
    [Show full text]
  • New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment
    New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment May 2011 New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment Final Report Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Department of Planning and Joint Development Office of Station Area Planning and Asset Management May 2011 Lead Agency: Consultant: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Parsons Brinckerhoff Authority Dudley Whitney, AICP, Project Manager Station Area Planning and Asset Management 1401 K Street NW Steven E. Goldin, Director Suite 701 Robin McElhenny, Manager of Station Area Planning Washington, DC 20005 John Magarelli, PE, Project Manager 600 5th Street NW Washington, DC 20001 New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment Contents Executive Summary ES-1 Assessment of Existing Conditions ES-1 Future Bus Bay Requirements ES-3 Introduction 1 Existing Conditions 7 Station Characteristics 7 Rail Service 9 Bus Service 10 Assessment of Existing Conditions at New Carrollton Metro Station and Recommended Short-Term Improvements 15 Estimate of Future Bus Bay Requirements 25 Future Land-Use 26 Methodology 29 Bus Bay Requirements 30 Future Estimates 31 Appendix A: Calculation of Future Bus Bay Requirements 35 New Carrollton Station Future Bus Facility Needs and Short-Term Access Assessment List of Figures Figure ES-1: Passenger Queues on the East Side ES-2 Figure 1: New Carrollton Metrorail Station Surrounding Area 1 Figure 2: Overview of the New Carrollton Bus Bays 7 Figure 3: Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Has the Retail Apocalypse Hit the DC Area?
    POLICY BRIEF Has the Retail Apocalypse Hit the DC Area? Leah Brooks, Urbashee Paul and Rachel Shank APRIL 2018 POLICY BRIEF APRIL 2018 | LEAH BROOKS, URBASHEE PAUL AND RACHEL SHANK1 In 1977, the White Flint Mall opened to great acclaim as Maryland’s premier mall, complete with glass elevators, glamorous anchor stores, and an exciting eatery. Now, more than four decades later, White Flint Mall is situated in a sea of empty parking lots. Except for anchor tenant Lord and Taylor, with which the mall owner is in protracted litigation, the mall sits empty. About a decade before White Flint launched, Northern Virginia’s Tysons Corner Center opened, also to acclaim. Tyson’s Corner has seen continued success,2 welcoming Apple’s flagship store in 2001,3 and Spanx’s first brick and mortar store in 2012.4 The promised increase in walkability ushered in by the Silver Line expansion has heralded opportunity for new residential and commercial development.5 To what extent is this divergence due to e-commerce? The Rise of E-commerce Indeed, there is substantial evidence that brick-and-mortar retail is suffering. CNN Money10 reports that 2017 marked E-commerce dates to 1994, when the New York Times the highest number of retail store closure announcements in reported that Philadelphia’s Phil Brandenberger used his history. Within the past year, once-prominent malls in computer to purchase a Sting album. In the following year, New Jersey and Pennsylvania have closed almost 200 Amazon sold its first book, and Pierre Omidyar founded stores. And the wave seems unlikely to be over: Toys R Us Ebay.6 has recently declared bankruptcy, while long-time anchor tenants Sears, Kmart, J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY International Student Management
    NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY International Student Management Office Fellows Handbook ‘I arrived as a stranger amongst strangers, but I will leave as a friend amongst friends.’ (Revised June 2014) Fellows: Welcome to Washington, D.C., capital of the United States of America. This beautiful city is the core of American government and it serves as a world-renowned educational center as well as a diverse cultural center. The staff at ISMO encourages you to enjoy your stay here as you experience politics, history, science, sports, art, and more. Fort Lesley J. McNair, home of the National Defense University (NDU), is ideally situated in the heart of Washington, D.C. for you to experience all of these things. Information about NDU can be obtained at www.ndu.edu; information about ISMO can be viewed at http://ismo.dodlive.mil. This handbook is designed to ease your transition into the NDU educational program for which you were personally selected. We have provided important information about housing, transportation, identification documents, and basic living needs. Please read it thoroughly. Unfortunately, no handbook can contain all of the information that you need, but you can talk to the staff, consult local directories, or use the internet to find something that you need. The most rewarding source of information about the area, and about America in general, is the population that surrounds you. Get to know your fellow students and neighbors make acquaintances and share experiences. They can give you suggestions about how to experience the USA. We encourage you to explore Washington, D.C. for yourself.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlboro Ridge Community Guide Copyright 2012 Toll Brothers, Inc
    A GUIDE TO THE SERVICES AVAILABLE NEAR YOUR NEW HOME Marlboro Ridge COMMUNITY GUIDE Copyright 2012 Toll Brothers, Inc. All rights reserved. These resources are provided for informational purposes only, and represent just a sample of the services available for each community. Toll Brothers in no way endorses or recommends any of the resources presented herein. MRCM-2537-30310 4/12 CONTENTS COMMUNITY PROFILE . 1 SCHOOLS . 2 SHOPPING . 3 MEDICAL FACILITIES . 4 PUBLIC UTILITIES . 4 WORSHIP . 5 TRANSPORTATION . 7 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES . 8 RESTAURANTS . 12 LIBRARIES . 14 COLLEGES . 14 VETERINARIANS . 15 SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS . 15 GOVERNMENT . 16 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS . 16 EMERGENCY . 17 LEARN ABOUT THE SERVICES YOUR COMMUNITY HAS TO OFFER COMMUNITY PROFILE Nestled in a charming country setting, Marlboro Ridge is a sophisticated recreational community offering state-of-the-art equestrian facilities and resort-style amenities, and is just minutes from any convenience you may need . Families who live here will enjoy the relaxed atmosphere of tranquil country living, with excellent shopping and a wide choice of cultural and recreational events close to home . The beautiful Potomac and Patuxent Rivers, only 20 minutes away, and the Chesapeake Bay and Maryland Eastern Shore, 45 minutes away, offer opportunities for boating, fishing, and other water sports . Several local and state parks are located nearby, including Rosaryville State Park, home to the historic Mount Airy Mansion, and Watkins Regional Park . At these parks, you and your family can enjoy touring a nature center, camping, picnicking, hiking, biking, and horseback riding, among other recreational activities . In addition to the many recreational opportunities, Prince George’s County also offers a broad variety of cultural diversions .
    [Show full text]
  • Approval of Term Sheet for Capitol Heights Joint Development Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary
    Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item V – A May 14, 2015 Approval of Term Sheet for Capitol Heights Joint Development Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 201480 Yes No TITLE: Capitol Heights Joint Development Term Sheet PRESENTATION SUMMARY: WMATA owns approximately 6.74 acres of land at the Capitol Heights Metro Station plus another 0.66 acres immediately southeast of the Metro Station property. In April 2014, WMATA issued a Joint Development Solicitation seeking private sector development on the surface parking lot at the Metro Station and on that 0.66-acre parcel. WMATA then selected Donatelli Development as the preferred developer and now wishes to sign a non-binding term sheet with Donatelli Development. PURPOSE: Approve the negotiation and execution of a non-binding term sheet with Donatelli Development for the development of a portion of WMATA's land at the Capitol Heights Metro Station. DESCRIPTION: Toward advancing WMATA's joint development program, in April 2014 WMATA issued a Joint Development Solicitation for private sector real estate development on a portion of WMATA's landholdings at the Capitol Heights Metro Station. The Solicitation offered the WMATA-owned surface parking lot area and a vacant WMATA-owned 0.66-acre parcel located across Davey Street and southeast of the parking lot. Donatelli Development submitted a proposal in response to the Solicitation. The proposal was very similar in concept to the development program anticipated by the Solicitation. As shown in "Key Highlights" below, the proposed project meets the recently adopted Board Evaluation Criteria for joint development.
    [Show full text]
  • Anchor Mental Health…………………………………………………………………
    District of Columbia Department of Mental Health Directory of Mental Health Rehabilitation Services Agencies 2008 - 2009 Revised Feb. 2009 1 Table of Contents: Access HelpLine (AHL)............................................................................................Pg. 5 CSA Directory: Anchor Mental Health…………………………………………………………………..... Pg. 6 Community Action Group…………………………………………………………………Pg. 7 Community Connections, Inc………………………………………………………........ Pg. 8 D.C. Community Services Agency (DCCSA)………………………………………….. Pg. 9 Family and Child Services of WDC, Inc…………………………………………………Pg. 10 Family Preservation……………………………………………………………….…….... Pg. 11 Fihankra Place, Inc……………………………………………………………….……..... Pg. 12 First Home Care Corporation……………………………………………………….…… Pg. 13 Georgetown Kids Medical Mobile Clinic (KMMC) …………………………………...Pg. 14 Green Door…………………………………………………………………………….……Pg. 15 Hillcrest Children’s Center………………………………………………………….….... Pg. 16 Latin American Youth Center…………………………………………………….………Pg. 17 Launch, LLC. ………………………………………………………………………………Pg. 18 Life Stride……………………………………………………………..………….……….. Pg. 19 Mary’s Center……………………………………………………………..……………..... Pg. 20 McClendon Center……………………………………………………………………..… Pg. 21 MD/DC Family Center ..........……………………………………………….…..……... Pg. 22 Neighbors Conseijo…………………………………………………………………....…. Pg. 23 Progressive Life…………………………………………………………………………….Pg. 24 PSI…………………………………………………………………………………...…...... Pg. 25 Psychiatric Center Chartered…………………………………………………….…........ Pg. 26 RCI Counseling Center……………………………………………………………………Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuter Parking at a Route-Terminal Metrorail Station
    Transportation Research Record 877 123 Commuter Parking at a Route-Terminal Metrorail Station HUGH WYNN Passenger service to and from the New Carrollton Metrorail Station, the first of computer models or modifications thereof. The the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) route-terminal travel forecasting models incorporate "modal-choice" rapid transit stations, was begun on November 20, 1978. The New Carrollton procedures that relate trip time and cost valu.es to Station marked completion of the first of nine suburban routes and branches each of several alternative modes of travel and ap­ on an approved 101-mile system, all of which will not be in place until 1990 portion travel between pairs of traffic zones ac­ or later. At New Carrollton, WMATA has provided 2251 automobile parking cording to empirically derived relations. The spaces for long- or short-term use. Surveys of parking-lot use were conducted models show that some potential Metrorail riders in 1979. License-plate numbers on cars parked in the all-day lots (1874 spaces find that their best choice would be to drive to a at the time of survey) were recorded on 50 different days (10 five-day weeks) Metro station and leave their cars there. A de­ during 1979. License numbers for all 50 days were matched by computer to established weekly and longer-term parking frequencies by persons who drove cision to make this choice implies that there will to the New Carrollton Station. Time-of-arrival and car-occupancy surveys be a place to leave the car. If there is no place were made during the course of these studies to establish commuter arrival to park, this constraint can be incorporated into habits.
    [Show full text]