POLYPETALAE – Petals Separate THALAMIFLORAE – Sepals, Petals and Stamens All Attached to Receptacle

POLYPETALAE – petals separate THALAMIFLORAE – Sepals, Petals and Stamens all attached to receptacle. Gynoecium apocarpous. RANUNCULACEAE (Herbaceous, leaves 3-parted) BERBERIDACEAE* (Carpel solitary, Anthers with flaps). Parietal placentation. [NOT Natural. Convergent evolution: Papaveraceae close to Ranunc., but remainder scattered amongst Rosids] PAPAVERACEAE* (Sepals 2, petals 4) CRUCIFERAE* (Petals 4, Stamens 6, ovary 2) CAPPARACEAE* (Ovary stalked) RESEDACEAE (Ovary open, 3-parted) CISTACEAE VIOLACEAE Ovary 2-3 septate. PITTOSPORACEAE* POLYGALACEAE. Axile placentation. CARYOPHYLLACEAE* PORTULACACEAE (Sepals gland-fringed) Stamens numerous; Calyx imbricate. GUTTIFERAE/CLUSIACEAE* THEACEAE Stamens numerous; Calyx valvate. MALVACEAE* (Anthers 1-celled) STERCULIACEAE TILIACEAE. DISCIFLORAE – Ovary superior, immersed in disk of flower. Ovule pendulous, raphe ventral;multiple series of stamens. LINACEAE; GERANIACEAE*; RUTACEAE Ovule pendulous, raphe dorsal OLACACEAE; AQUIFOLIACEAE*. Ovule erect, raphe ventral CELASTRACEAE; RHAMNACEAE*; VITACEAE. Ovule ascending, raphe ventral to reversed SAPINDACEAE*; ANACARDIACEAE CALYCIFLORAE – Stamens fused to Calyx of flower Ovaries separate, rarely united LEGUMINOSAE ROSACEAE* [SAXIFRAGALES. Carpels ±fused, separate styles: SAXIFRAGACEAE* (2 carps) CRASSULACEAE (5-6 carps) HAMAMELIDACEAE (2)] [: HYDRANGEACEAE – opp leaves, syncarpous. ESCALLONIACEAE – alt leaves dry pod => ASTERIDS Ovary syncarpous; divided into locules. MYRTACEAE (stamens numerous) LYTHRACEAE* ONAGRACEAE*. Ovary syncarpous; Parietal placentation LOASACEAE; TURNERACEAE; PASSIFLORACEAE; CUCURBITACEAE*; BEGONIACEAE; DATISCACEAE. Ficoidales – Ovary syncarpous; sub-basal placentation [the basal placentation is critical in placing these families among the Caryophyllids see above] CACTACEAE; AIZOACEAE.] Umbellales – Ovary syncarpous; 1 ovule per locule. [these families belong amongst the basal Asterids. Inferior ovaries but with separate petals] UMBELLIFERAE (2-locules); ARALIACEAE (5-locules); CORNACEAE. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Appendix 1 Vernacular Names
Appendix 1 Vernacular Names The vernacular names listed below have been collected from the literature. Few have phonetic spellings. Spelling is not helped by the difficulties of transcribing unwritten languages into European syllables and Roman script. Some languages have several names for the same species. Further complications arise from the various dialects and corruptions within a language, and use of names borrowed from other languages. Where the people are bilingual the person recording the name may fail to check which language it comes from. For example, in northern Sahel where Arabic is the lingua franca, the recorded names, supposedly Arabic, include a number from local languages. Sometimes the same name may be used for several species. For example, kiri is the Susu name for both Adansonia digitata and Drypetes afzelii. There is nothing unusual about such complications. For example, Grigson (1955) cites 52 English synonyms for the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) in the British Isles, and also mentions several examples of the same vernacular name applying to different species. Even Theophrastus in c. 300 BC complained that there were three plants called strykhnos, which were edible, soporific or hallucinogenic (Hort 1916). Languages and history are linked and it is hoped that understanding how lan- guages spread will lead to the discovery of the historical origins of some of the vernacular names for the baobab. The classification followed here is that of Gordon (2005) updated and edited by Blench (2005, personal communication). Alternative family names are shown in square brackets, dialects in parenthesis. Superscript Arabic numbers refer to references to the vernacular names; Roman numbers refer to further information in Section 4.
[Show full text]
Bentham and Hooker Classification Faculty Name - Dr Piyush Kumar Rai Email – [email protected]
Course - B.Sc. Botany Semester - II Paper Code - BOT GE202 Paper Name – Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Topic - Bentham and Hooker Classification Faculty Name - Dr Piyush Kumar Rai Email – [email protected] Bentham and Hooker Classification George Bentham (1800 – 1884) Joseph Hooker (1817 – 1911) It was Proposed by George Bentham ( 1800 – 1884 ) and Joseph Dalton Hooker (1817 – 1911 ) in their Genera Plantarum published during July (1862 ) & April ( 1883 ) George Bentham (1800 – 1884) and Joseph Dalton Hooker ( 1817 ) – 1911) , the two British botanist who were associated with the Royal Botanic garden at kew ( England) gave most important and easily workable system of classification of angiosperms and published it in three volume of ‘Genera plantarum ‘ The first part of Genera plantarum appeared in July 1882 and the last part in April 1883 . This was the greatest taxonomic work ever produced in the united kingdom and ever since been an inspiration to generations of kew botanists . Although Bentham and Hooker’s system of classification was based on that of A.P. de Candolle but greater stress was given on contrast between free and fused petals . Their symptom was widely accepted in Britain and commonwealth countries but in Europe and North America it did not hold the much ground . Bentham and Hooker divided the seed plants into Dicotyledons, Gymnosperms and Monocotyledons. They placed Ranales in beginning and grasses at the end . The following is the summary of Bentham & Hooker’s system. DICOTYLEDONS : A . Polypetalae ( petals are free ) Series l Thalamiflorae Order 1. Ranales eg. Ranunculaceae, Magnollaceae e.t.c Order 2. Parietales eg. Papaveraceae , Cruciferae e.t.c Order 3.
[Show full text]
Phytosociological Study of Coastal Flora of Devbhoomi Dwarka District and Its Islands in the Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat
International Journal of Scientific Research in _______________________________ Research Paper . Biological Sciences Vol.6, Issue.3, pp.01-13, June (2019) E-ISSN: 2347-7520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrbs/v6i3.113 Phytosociological study of coastal flora of Devbhoomi Dwarka district and its islands in the Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat L. Das1*, H. Salvi2, R. D. Kamboj 3 1,3Gujarat Ecological Education and Research Foundation, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India 2Department of Botany, Songadh Government Science College, Tapi, Gujarat, India *Corresponding Author: [email protected]; Tel.: +91-7573020436 Available online at: www.isroset.org Received: 16/May/2019, Accepted: 02/Jun/2019, Online: 30/Jun/2019 Abstract- The study described the diversity and phytosociological attributes of plant species (trees, shrubs and herbs) in coastal areas of Devbhoomi Dwarka District and its islands in the Gulf of Kachchh. A random sampling method was employed in this study. A total of 243 plant species were recorded of which trees and shrubs represented with 30 specieseach. Grasses & sedges were also represented by 30 species and 29 species were climbers. Among the tree and shrub species, Prosopis juliflora showed the highest density (373.51 ind. /ha), frequency (63.50.67%), relative density (30.19.7%), relative frequency (24.41%) and relative abundance (7.68%).Regarding herb species, Aristida redacta represented the highest density (3.97ind./sq.m) and frequency (39.02%). Moreover, the highest importance value index was measured in Prosopis juliflora (62.28) among trees & shrubs and Aristida redacta (31.51) among herbs. The Abundance/Frequency ratio of trees, shrubs and herb species showed contagious distribution pattern within the study area.
[Show full text]
Bentham and Hooker's Classification (1862 – ’83)
Bentham and Hooker's classification (1862 – ’83) George Bentham and Joseph Dalton Hooker - Two English taxonomists who were closely associated with the Royal Botanical Garden at Kew, England have given a detailed classification of plant kingdom, particularly the angiosperms. They gave an outstanding system of classification of phanerogams in their Genera Plantarum which was published in three volumes between the years 1862 to 1883. It is a natural system of classification. However, it does not show the evolutionary relationship between different groups of plants, in the strict sense. Nevertheless, it is the most popular system of classification particularly for angiosperms. The popularity comes from the face that very clear key characters have been listed for each of the families. These key characters enable the students of taxonomy to easily identify and assign any angiosperm plant to its family. Bentham and Hooker have grouped advanced, seed bearing plants into a major division called Phanerogamia. This division has been divided into three classes namely: 1. Dicotyledonae 2. Gymnospermae and 3. Monocotyledoneae 84 45 36 3 34 PhanerogamsSummaryor spermatophyta of Benthamare anddivided Hooker'sinto three classificationclasses - Dicotyledonae (1862 – 83), Gymnospermae and Monocotyledonae Class - Dicotyledonae– two cotyledons, open vascular bundles, reticulate venation I. Sub-Class Polypetalae - The flowers are usually with two distinct whorls of perianth; the segments of the inner whorl or "corolla" are free. A. Series-Thalamiflorae -(The calyx consists of usually distinct sepals, which are free from the ovary; doom shaped thalamus). 6 Orders/Cohort; 34 Families or Natural orders -R B. Series – Disciflorae - The calyx consists of either distinct or united sepals, which may be free or adnate to the ovary; a prominent ring of cushion shaped disc is usually present below the ovary, sometimes broken up into glands; the stamens are usually definite in number, inserted upon, or at the outer or inner base of the disc; the ovary is superior.
[Show full text]
Bibliographie Sur Les Genres Cistus L. Et Halimium (Dunal) Spach
1 Bibliographie sur les genres Cistus L. et Halimium (Dunal) Spach : Sommaire : Partie 1 : Liste de références bibliographiques classées par ordre alphabétique des auteurs ....p. 1- 136 Partie 2 : Liste de références bibliographiques avec le classement suivant : Généralités (Systématique, Nomenclature, Morphologie, Hybridation, Ladanum…), France, Régions-Départements, Europe, Iles Macaronésiennes, Afrique du Nord, Proche-Orient. ………………………………………...p. 136- 177 Partie 1 : 1. AAFI, A. 2007. Etude de la diversité floristique de l'écosystème de chêne-liège de la forêt de la Mamora. Thèse Doctorat es-Sciences Agronomiques. Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Maroc.:190 p. 2. AAFI, A., A. ACHHAL EL KADMIRI, A. BENABID, and M. ROCHDI. 2005. Richesse et diversité floristique de la suberaie de la Mamora ( Maroc ). Acta Botanica Malacitana. 30:127-138. 3. ABBAS, H., M. BARBERO, R. LOISEL, and P. QUEZEL. 1985. Les forêts de pin d'Alep dans le Sud-Est méditerranéen français. Analyses écodendrologiques. Deuxième partie. Forêt Méditerranéenne. VII, n°2.:123-130. 4. ABBAYES, H. d. 1954. Le Chêne-vert (Quercus ilex L.) et son cortège floristique méditerranéen sur le littoral sud-ouest du Massif Armoricain. Vegetatio, La Haye. 5-6.:1-5. 5. ABBAYES, H. d., G. CLAUSTRES, R. CORILLION, and P. DUPONT. 1971. Flore et Végétation du Massif Armoricain. Saint-Brieuc : Presses Universitaires de Bretagne.: 258-260. 6. ABBAYES, H. d., and P. DUPONT. 1995. Supplément ( jusqu'à l'Année 1974 ) à la flore vasculaire du Massif Armoricain. E.R.I.C.A. 7 : 26. 7. ABI-SALEH, B., M. BARBERO, I. NAHAL, and P. QUEZEL. 1976. Les séries forestières de végétation au Liban.
[Show full text]
Bentham and Hooker's System of Angiosperm Classification
COMPILED AND CIRCULATED BY PROF. NANDITA BHAKAT, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY, NARAJOLE RAJ COLLEGE BENTHAM AND HOOKER’S SYSTEM OF ANGIOSPERM CLASSIFICATION PROF. NANDITA BHAKAT Assistant professor Department of Botany Narajole Raj College BOTANY: SEM-IV, PAPER-C10T: PLANT SYSTEMATICS, UNIT-4: SYSTEMS OF CLASSIFICATION. COMPILED AND CIRCULATED BY PROF. NANDITA BHAKAT, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY, NARAJOLE RAJ COLLEGE INTRODUCTION Classification denotes the arrangement of a single plant or group of plants an distinct category following a system of nomenclature, and in accordance with a particular and well established plan. Some of the earlier systems of classification of angiosperms were artificial systems, since they used only certain superficial characteristics as the basis. With more and more detailed study on the morphological, physiological and reproductive aspects of angiosperms, the artificial systems of classifications were replaced by the natural systems of classification. BOTANY: SEM-IV, PAPER-C10T: PLANT SYSTEMATICS, UNIT-4: SYSTEMS OF CLASSIFICATION. COMPILED AND CIRCULATED BY PROF. NANDITA BHAKAT, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY, NARAJOLE RAJ COLLEGE George Bentham and Joseph Dalton Hooker - Two English taxonomists who were closely associated with the Royal Botanical Garden at Kew, England have given a detailed classification of plant kingdom, particularly the angiosperms. They gave an outstanding system of classification of phanerogams in their Genera Plantarum which was published in three volumes between the years 1862 to 1883. It is a natural system of classification. They described 97,205 species of flowering plants grouped into 202 orders (now recognised as families). The system has the advantage of being the first great natural system of classification, which is very easy to follow.
[Show full text]
Bbyct-133 Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Nomenclature and Systems of Classification
BBYCT-133 PLANT ECOLOGY AND Indira Gandhi TAXONOMY National Open University School of Sciences Block 4 NOMENCLATURE AND SYSTEMS OF CLASSIFICATION UNIT 16 Binomial Nomenclature 109 UNIT 17 Scientific Naming of Plants: Nomenclature 120 UNIT 18 System of Classification 141 UNIT 19 Biometrics, Numerical Taxonomy 161 UNIT 20 Cladistics 172 Course Design Committee Prof. A.K. Bhatnagar (Retd.) School of Sciences, Department of Botany, IGNOU University of Delhi, Delhi-110054 Prof. M.S. Nathawat, Director, Dr. A.K. Kavathekar (Retd.) Prof. Vijayshri, Director (Ex.) Sr. Consultant, Prof. Amrita Nigam Department of Botany, Prof. Jaswant Sokhi Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110001 Block Preparation Team Prof. Amrita Nigam Dr. A.K. Kavathekar (Retd.) School of Sciences, IGNOU Sr. Consultant Department of Botany Prof. Jaswant Sokhi Sri Venkateswara College, School of Sciences, IGNOU University of Delhi, Dr. E. Chauhan (Unit-20) New Delhi-110001 Sr. Consultant Department of Botany Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110019 Course Coordinators: Prof. Amrita Nigam and Prof. Jaswant Sokhi Production Mr. Sunil Kumar AR(P), SOS, IGNOU Acknowledgements: Dr. Eklavya Chauhan for giving useful inputs. Sh. Manoj Kumar, Assistant for word processing and CRC preparation. Mr. Ajit Kumar for diagrams. November, 2019 Indira Gandhi National Open University, 2019 ISBN: All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form, by mimeograph or any other means, without permission in writing from Indira Gandhi National Open University. Further information on Indira Gandhi National Open University courses may be obtained from the University’s office at MaidanGarhi, New Delhi-110 068 or IGNOU website www.ignou.ac.in.
[Show full text]
9/11/2019 Botany Dept 1 INTRODUCTION
9/11/2019 Botany Dept 1 INTRODUCTION • Classification denotes the arrangement of a single plant or group of plants an distinct category following a system of nomenclature, and in accordance with a particular and well established plan. • Some of the earlier systems of classification of angiosperms were artificial systems, since they used only certain superficial characteristics as the basis. • With more and more detailed study on the morphological, physiological and reproductive aspects of angiosperms, the artificial systems of classifications were replaced by the natural systems of classification. • George Bentham and Joseph Dalton Hooker - Two English taxonomists who were closely associated with the Royal Botanical Garden at Kew, England have given a detailed classification of plant kingdom, particularly the angiosperms. • They gave an outstanding system of classification of phanerogams in their Genera Plantarum which was published in three volumes between the years 1862 to 1883. It is a natural system of classification. • They described 97,205 species of flowering plants grouped into 202 orders (now recognised as families). • The system has the advantage of being the first great natural system of classification, which is very easy to follow. George Bentham 1800-1884 Joseph Dalton Hooker 1817-1911 SUB-CLASS - POLYPETALAE petals separate Series THALAMIFLORAE DISCIFLORAE CALYCIFLORAE Orders Orders Orders Ranales Geraniales Rosales Parietales Olacales Myrtales Polygalineae Celastrales Passiflorales Caryophyllineae Sapindales Ficoidales Guttiferales
[Show full text]
Bentham and Hooker's System of Plant Classification
Bentham and hooker’s system of plant classification BY DR RAJIB KAGYUNG The most accepted natural system of classification of seed plants is that of Bentham and Hooker. It is a natural system of classification and is based on important characters of the plants. Even today this system is being followed in India, United Kingdom and several other Commonwealth countries. It is also used in a number of herbaria and botanical gardens all over the world. It is a well-known and widely accepted classification of seeded plants. It was proposed by two British botanists George Bentham (1800-1884) and Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker (1817-1911). They were associated with Royal Botanical Garden at Kew and adopted a very comprehensive system of classification which is purely natural and most convenient and extremely suitable system for practical utility in identification of plants providing them, their respective taxon. This was the greatest taxonomic work ever produced in the United Kingdom and has ever since been an inspiration to generations of Kew botanists. Their system of classification was published in ‘Genera Plantarum’ in three volumes and they had described 97,205 species of seeded plants in 202 orders (now referred to as families). This three-volume monumental work which required quarter of a century, comprised description of all genera of seed plants known to science at that time and they were classified according to the system proposed by them. This system was published well before there were internationally accepted rules for botanical nomenclature. It indicates a family by “order”; an order is indicated by “cohorts” (in the first two volumes) or “series” (in the third volume); in the first two volumes “series” refers to a rank above that of order.
[Show full text]
Biosystematics of Angiosperms, Plant Development and Reproduction
MBO-06 Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Biosystematics of Angiosperms, Plant Development and Reproduction MBO-06 Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Biosystematics of Angiosperms, Plant Development and Reproduction Course Development Committee Chair Person Prof. Ashok Sharma Vice-Chancellor Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Coordinator and Members Convener Dr. Anuradha Dubey Department of Botany School of Science & Technology Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Kota Members Prof. L.R.Gurjar Prof. T.N. Bhardwaj Director (Academic) (Special Invite) Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, Former Vice-Chancellor, Kota VMOU, Kota Dr. Arvind Pareek Dr. P.K. Sharma Director (Regional Centre) Department of Botany Vardhman Mahaveer Open University, MSJ College, Kota Bharatpur Prof. B.L. Choudhary Dr. P.P. Paliwal Former Vice-Chancellor, Department of Botany MohanLal Sukhadia University, Udaipur Govt. PG College, Banswara Prof. S.L. Kothari Dr. Ekta Menghani Department of Botany Department of Botany University of Rajasthan, Jaipur JECRC University, Jaipur Dr. G.P. Singh Dr. Neerja Srivastava Department of Botany Department of Botany University of Rajasthan, Jaipur Govt. PG College, Kota Dr. Vandana Sharma Department of Botany Govt. PG College, Kota Editing and Course Writing Editor Dr. G.P. Singh Department of Botany University of Rajasthan, Jaipur Writers: Dr. Amit Kotia 1,2,3,4 Dr. Praveen Soni 9,15, Department of Botany Department of Botany 17 University of Rajasthan, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur Jaipur Dr. Praveen Mohil 5,6,7,8 Dr. Sulekha Joshi 18,19 Department of Botany Department of Botany University of Rajasthan, Govt. College, Kota Jaipur Dr. Jitendra Kumar Verma 10,11,12 Dr. Anuradha Dubey 20 Department of Botany Department of Botany J.D.B.
[Show full text]
An Identification Key
AN IDENTIFICATION KEY Artificial key for the identification of some families of Angiosperms. ' This key is based on the Bentham and Hooker's system of classzj?cation. 1. Leaves reticulately-veined; flowers 4- or 5-merous; bracteoles (when present) usually 2, lateral; tap root usually present; embryo with two cotyledoi~s................................................ .2. (Class Dicotyledons) 1. Leaves parallel-veined; flowers 3-merous; bracteoles (when present) usually' 1, adaxial; tap root usually absent; embryo with one cotyledon ..... ..........................................................3. (Class Monocotyledons) Key to Su b-classes of Dicotyledons 2. Perianth of 2 whorls, usually distinguished into calyx and corolla ......... 4. 4. Inner whorl of perianth (corolla) parts mostly free up to the base (i.e., petals free); stamens not epipetalous ....... ..5. (Sub-class Polypetalae) 4. Inner whorl of perianth (corolla) parts mostly united (i.e., petals fused); stamens few and mostly epipetalous .........6. (Sub-class Garnopetalae) 2. Perianth absent, or of 1 whorl (calyx-like) or Zwhorled with the segments not distinguishable into calyx and corolla ........................................ .................................................7. (Sub-class Monochlarnydeae) Key to Series of Polypetalae 5. Perianth and stamens usually hypogynous; ovary mostly superior; sepals mostly distinct and free ...........................................................8. t 8. Conspicuous disc below the ovaryhot ,resent ............................
[Show full text]
Practical Cover Page(New2)
Exercise 3 Determination of pH, and analysis of two soil samples for carbonates, chlorides, nitrates, sulphates, organic matter and base deficiency by rapid field test ObjectivesObjectivesObjectives After performing this exercise you should be able to: measure the soil pH, analyse soil to demonstrate presence/absence of carbonates, chlorides, nitrates, sulphates, organic matter and base deficiency using simple tests, and record the chemical characteristics of soil. 3.2 SOIL pH Soil pH is the most important property of the soil. It is related to plant nutrition. Soil pH is a measure of the hydrogen ion (H+) activity in the soil solution. It is defined as the -log 10 of the hydrogen ion concentration. Soil pH gives the concentration of hydrogen ions that can be easily exchanged. The pH exerts a strong effect on solubility and availability of nutrient elements. It influences nutrient uptake by plants. Soil pH between pH 6.0 and 6.5 indicates that most plant nutrients are in their most available state. Soil pH affects nutrient availability as the H+ ions take up space on the negative charges along the soil surface displacing nutrients. A pH less than 4 in soil indicates the presence of free acids obtained from the oxidation of sulfides. At pH less than 5.5, high concentrations of H+, aluminum and manganese in soil solution can reach toxic levels. A pH more than 5.5 suggests occurrence of ions such as aluminium and phosphorus. A pH of 7.8 to 8.2 indicates presence of calcium carbonate. Elements like nitrogen, potassium, calcium, magnesium and sulfur are more available within soil at pH 6.5 to 8 while boron, copper, iron, manganese, nickel and zinc are more readily available within soil pH 5 to 7.
[Show full text]