DOCSLIB.ORG

Roosevelt County Long Range Plan 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roosevelt County Long Range Plan 2020 2020 ROOSEVELT COUNTY LONG RANGE PLAN USDA NRCS CULBERTSON FIELD OFFICE ROOSEVELT COUNTY LONG RANGE PLAN Table of Contents SECTION I: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 VISION ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 MISSION .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................... 4 PARTNERS .................................................................................................................................................. 4 TIME FRAME .............................................................................................................................................. 4 SECTION II NATURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ................................................................................................ 5 General Information .................................................................................................................................. 5 NOAA ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 People ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Assiniboine and Sioux Tribe ................................................................................................................... 6 Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana ............................................................................... 7 Turtle Mountain Allotments ................................................................................................................. 7 Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................. 7 The Froid Research Farm ....................................................................................................................... 7 Agriculture Statistics .............................................................................................................................. 8 Landcover/Land Use ................................................................................................................................ 11 Land Ownership ...................................................................................................................................... 12 SOILS ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 LRR & MLRAS ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Geology ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Soil Associations .................................................................................................................................. 17 Soils on Flood Plains ............................................................................................................................ 17 Soils on Moderately Steep to Steep Uplands, Terraces and Outwash Plains. ...................................... 17 Soils on Nearly Level to Strongly Sloping uplands, Fans and Terraces ................................................. 18 HEL Soils .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance and Prime Farmland If Irrigated Soils................... 18 Prime Farmland ................................................................................................................................... 18 Farmland of Statewide Importance Soils ............................................................................................. 18 Prime Farmland if Irrigated Soils ......................................................................................................... 19 Hydric Soils .......................................................................................................................................... 20 WATER ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 1 | P a g e ROOSEVELT COUNTY LONG RANGE PLAN Hydrography ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Stream Flow ........................................................................................................................................ 22 Surface Water Quality ......................................................................................................................... 25 Groundwater ....................................................................................................................................... 26 AIR AND ENERGY ..................................................................................................................................... 28 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................ 28 Utilities ................................................................................................................................................ 28 Petroleum Development ..................................................................................................................... 28 PLANTS AND ANIMALS ............................................................................................................................ 29 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................. 29 Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge .............................................................................................. 31 Plant Species of Concern ..................................................................................................................... 32 Animal Species of Concern .................................................................................................................. 32 Grassland Birds .................................................................................................................................... 36 Noxious Weeds .................................................................................................................................... 39 Aquatic Invasive Species ...................................................................................................................... 40 SECTION III CONSERVATION ACTIVITY ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... 41 Farm Bill Programs .................................................................................................................................. 41 CTA ...................................................................................................................................................... 41 CRP ...................................................................................................................................................... 41 EQIP ..................................................................................................................................................... 41 CSP & CStwP ........................................................................................................................................ 42 SECTION IV NATURAL RESOURCE PROBLEMS AND DESIRED FUTURE OUTCOMES ..................................... 42 Cropland .................................................................................................................................................. 42 Rangeland ............................................................................................................................................... 43 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................................... 43 Desired Future Outcome......................................................................................................................... 43 SECTION V PRIORITIZATION OF NATURAL RESOURCE PROBLEMS AND DESIRED OUTCOMES .................. 43 Transition of expiring Conservation Reserve Program acres to other appropriate uses ............................. 44 a. Land Use Planning ................................................................................................................................... 44 b. Fencing and Water Development ........................................................................................................... 44 c. Crop Rotations, Buffer Strips, Nutrient and Pest Management .............................................................. 44 d. Increased
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Report
    IMPACT OF CANADIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ON NORTHERN MONTANA HIGHWAYS FHWA/MT-10-001/8197 Final Report prepared for THE STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION in cooperation with THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION April 2010 prepared by Daniel Hodge Khalid Bekka Jon Lee Jonny Abedrabbo Geoff Parkins Fred Kramer HDR|Decision Economics Silver Spring, Maryland RESEARCH PROGRAMS You are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work; make derivative works; make commercial use of the work under the condition that you give the original author and sponsor credit. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the sponsor. Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Impact of Canadian Economic Development on Northern Montana Highways Prepared for The State of Montana Department of Transportation Prepared by HDR | Decision Economics 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 910 Silver Spring, MD 20910 April 2010 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. FHWA/MT-10-001/8197 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date April, 2010 Impact of Canadian Economic Development on Northern Montana Highways 6. Performing Organization Code HDR | Decision Economics 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Daniel Hodge, Khalid Bekka, Jon Lee, Johnny Abedrabbo, Geoff Parkins, Fred Kramer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. HDR | Decision Economics 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 910 11. Contract or Grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Involvement
    Appendix G: Public Involvement US 2 / MT 16 TRED STUDY MDT ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN APPENDIX G APRIL 2007 Montana Department of Transportation Public Involvement Activities & Final Study Comments and Edits Final Prepared by: Montana Department of Transportation and HDR | HLB Decision Economics Inc. 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 910 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Tel: (240) 485-2600 Fax: (240) 485-2635 April 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT ................................................................................. 2 TRED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES ......................................................... 3 COMMENTS RECEIVED .............................................................................................. 5 FHWA Comments........................................................................................................ 5 Corps of Engineers Comments ................................................................................... 9 US Fish and Wildlife Service Comments .................................................................. 10 North Dakota Department of Transportation Comments ......................................... 11 Appendix A Comments .............................................................................................. 13 EPA E-mail and Letter.............................................................................................. 14 Corps of Engineers Response Letter......................................................................... 17 EXPERT PANELIST COMMENTS......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Area
    Dawson County /Glendive Growth Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................i PART ONE CONDITIONS AND TRENDS PLANNING AREA ........................................................................................................................1 POPULATION ..............................................................................................................................5 ECONOMICS..............................................................................................................................11 Employment............................................................................................................... 11 Income....................................................................................................................... 20 HOUSING ...................................................................................................................................27 General...................................................................................................................... 27 Number of Housing Units........................................................................................... 27 LAND USE..................................................................................................................................34 Ownership and Land Use Data.................................................................................. 34 Residential Development..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic History of Northeastern Montana and Northwestern North Dakota with Emphasis on the Pleistocene
    Cenozoic History of Northeastern Montana and Northwestern North Dakota With Emphasis on the Pleistocene GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 326 Cenozoic History of Northeastern Montana and Northwestern North Dakota With Emphasis on the Pleistocene By ARTHUR DAVID HOWARD GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 326 A study emphasizing the Pleistocene history of the north-central Great Plains, with descriptions of glacial and nonglacial deposits and of major drainage changes UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1960 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 107 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract, _ __________ _______________________________ 1 Quaternary stratigraphy Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 3 Early Wisconsin (?) drift Continued Purpose of study ______________________________ 3 Surface topography. ________________-_----__ 33 Field methods. ________________________________ 3 Differentiation _____________________________ 34 Pebble analyses. _ ___________________________ 3 Age of drift. ____-_-_-_____-______----_----_ 35 Isopleth maps. _____________________________ 4 Wisconsin age. _ ________________________ 35 Acknowledgments------ __---_-_-_-______________ 7 Summary of age discussion__ _______ ______ 36 Physiographic setting _______________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge Northeastern Montana Wetlands District Lamesteer National Wildlife Refuge
    MEDICINE LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE NORTHEASTERN MONTANA WETLANDS DISTRICT LAMESTEER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Medicine Lake, Montana ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1986 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEW AND APPROVALS MEDICINE LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Medicine Lake, Montana ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1986 Refuge Supervisor Review Date Regional Orffirce Approval Date INTRODUCTION Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge is situated on the glaci­ ated rolling plains in the far northeast corner of Montana. It is located in Sheridan and Roosevelt Counties. This refuge lies in the highly productive prairie pothole region and has relief typical of the glacial drift prairie with relatively gentle rolling plains with occasional shallow depressions. This is basically a prairie refuge located in the transition zone be­ tween the mixed grass and short grass prairie. Native brush species consisting primarily of chokecherry, buffalo berry and snowberry are common in coulees and sandhill areas. A few old shelterbelts still remain on the refuge and these trees appear to be out of place on the prairie, but are composed of a variety of introduced deciduous species. The climate is typical of the northern great plains, with warm summers and cold winters, and marked variations in seasonal pre­ cipitation. Precipitation averages 12 to 15 inches per year. Temperatures can exceed 1000F in the summer and drop to -450F in the winter. Spring is generally the windiest period with veloci­ ties of 20 miles per hour that are associated with passing weather systems. The refuge encompasses 31,457 acres, which includes 13,546 acres of open water and marsh, 14,354 acres of grasslands and 3,557 acres of cultivated lands, primarily former croplands.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Medicine Lake National
    Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge Complex August 2007 Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge Complex 223 North Shore Road Medicine Lake, MT 59247 406/789 2305 and Region 6, Mountain–Prairie Region Division of Refuge Planning 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80228 303/236 4305 Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................5 1.1 Purpose and Need for Plan............................................................................................................................5 1.2 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Wildlife Refuge System ....................................7 1.3 National and Regional Mandates .................................................................................................................8 1.4 Refuge Contributions to the National and Regional Plans ......................................................................9 1.5 Ecosystem Description and Threats..........................................................................................................13 1.6 Planning Process...........................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge Lamesteer National Wildlife Refuge
    MEDICINE LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LAMESTEER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Medicine Lake, Montana ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1983 U. S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM MDL-1983 Photo by: SPB A Personnel 1. Eugene D. Stroops, Refuge Manager GS-12 PET 2. Steven P. Brock, Assistant Refuge Manager GS-9 PET 3. Frances K. Larson, Refuge Assistant GS-5 PET A. Kermit E. Bolstad, Automotive Mechanic WG-10 PET 5. John E. Snellman, Maintenance Worker WG-8 PET 6. Carl S. Kampen, Maintenance Worker WG-7 PPT 7. Dennis C. Nelson, Motor Vehicle Operator WG-6 PPT / Reviews and Approvals (gA ^3/W Submitted by: Date Regional Office Review STUDENT VOLUNTEERS MDL - 1983 Photo by: SPB Michael Raassaka Scot Cline YCC SUMMER HELP Sandi Bolstad Victor Iverson Monica Nielsen Ted Tronson Paul Reuter Robert Kirby • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 A. HIGHLIGHTS 2 B. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS 3 C. LAND ACQUISITIONS 1. Fee Title Nothing to report 2. Easement Nothing to report 3. Other Nothing to report D. PLANNING 1. Master Plan Nothing to report 2. Management Plan 3 3. Public Participation Nothing to report 4. Compliance with Environmental Mandates 3 5. Research and Investigations 3 E. ADMINISTRATION 1. Personnel 4 2. Youth Programs 5 3. Other Manpower Programs Nothing to report 4. Volunteers Program 6 5. Funding 6 6. Safety 7 7. Technical Assistance Nothing to report 8. Other Items Nothing to report F. HABITAT MANAGEMENT 1. General 7 2. Wetlands 8 3. Forests Nothing to report 4. Croplands 10 5. Grasslands 12 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Geologic Map of the Wolf Point 1° × 2° Quadrangle, Montana
    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Open-File Report 2016–1142 U.S. Geological Survey Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology 106°00' 104°00' R 44 E R 45 E R 46 E CANADA R 54 E R 55 E R 56 E R 57 E R 58 E 49°00' 49°00' R 47 E 105°30' R 48 E R 49 E R 50 E 105˚00' R 51 E R 52 E R 53 E 104°30' lca T T LIST OF MAP UNITS CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS wla wla UNITED STATES 64 64 xsh tlx xsh tlx tlx(s) N N agu wla tlx R lca kg HOLOCENE AND LATE WISCONSIN GLACIOFLUVIAL tlx(s) lss Commonly pitted with ice-block depressions (kettles). Boulder litters locally are lca lca lca gg al DEPOSITS Collier, A.J., and Thom, W.T., Jr., 1918, The Flaxville gravel and its relation to other terrace Rogers, G.S., 1917, Baked shale and slag formed by the burning of coal beds: U.S. Geological agu kg kg lss Flood-plain and channel alluvium present on surface. Local surface relief is generally 3–15 m, locally >20 m. In T gg gg lss gravels of the northern Great Plains: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 108–J, Survey Professional Paper 108–A, p. 1–10. xsh R tlx tlx(e) T PALUDAL COLLUVIAL some places, deposits were modified by waves and currents in lakes; ice-contact 37 gg lss 37 agu Flood-plain and channel alluvium DEPOSITS DEPOSITS BEDROCK p.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Prospective Franchise Restaurant Investors
    A Guide for Prospective Franchise Restaurant Investors Glendive Community Introduction Dickinson to Glendive - 101 miles Nestled along the iconic Yellowstone River amidst • Glendive is a tourist destination. We are home to a sprawling sea of jagged badlands and rolling prai- Makoshika State Park, Montana’s largest state park ries under the Big Sky, Glendive, Montana’s “Gate and voted the #1 travel attraction in the state by City” and the “Paddlefish Capital of the World,” is USA Today in 2017. Visitation and overnight camp- the county seat of Dawson County (pop. 9,431 per ing in Makoshika have risen consistently each year most recent Census estimates) and the first commu- over the past five years, with more than 96,000 vis- nity of any size visitors entering Montana from the itors tallied in 2017 and overnight camping increas- east arrive to, conveniently located along Interstate ing by 40 percent over the previous year. 94. Glendive is home to about 7,300 residents in- Besides Makoshika, there are several annual events cluding the unincorporated residential subdivisions which also draw large numbers of visitors to Glen- Glendive to Miles City - 75 miles adjacent to the city on the west bank of the Yel- dive throughout the year. The event season kicks lowstone River. A few more important facts about off with the annual Glendive Agriculture and Trade Glendive: Expo (GATE) in February. The Makoshika Youth Basketball Tournament in March brings in traveling • Don’t be fooled by the Census data! Official Cen- youth teams from all around the region, with 98 Glendive is nearly equidistant to Dickinson, ND, and Miles City, MT, the next closest cities on I-94 with fast food restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota Strategic Freight Planning Analysis Phase I: 2006-2008
    North Dakota Strategic Freight Planning Analysis Phase I: 2006-2008 Prepared for North Dakota Department of Transportation Mark Berwick Mark Lofgren Tamara VanWechel Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota October 2009 Disclaimer The contents presented in this report are the sole responsibility of the Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute and the authors. North Dakota State University does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, public assistance status, sex, sexual orientation, status as a U.S. veteran, race or religion. Direct inquiries to the Vice President for Equity, Diversity and Global Outreach, 205 Old Main, (701)231-7708. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION TO FREIGHT AND THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ........................... 1 1.1 The Transportation System .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Highways ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Railroads .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.3 Air 8 1.1.4 Pipelines .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Freight Transportation ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transport Equity Act: a Legacy for Users 2005
    PUBLIC LAW 109–59—AUG. 10, 2005 SAFE, ACCOUNTABLE, FLEXIBLE, EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT: A LEGACY FOR USERS VerDate 14-DEC-2004 12:11 Sep 09, 2005 Jkt 039139 PO 00059 Frm 00001 Fmt 6579 Sfmt 6579 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL059.109 APPS06 PsN: PUBL059 119 STAT. 1144 PUBLIC LAW 109–59—AUG. 10, 2005 Public Law 109–59 109th Congress An Act Aug. 10, 2005 To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit [H.R. 3] programs, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of Safe, the United States of America in Congress assembled, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Transportation Equity Act: A (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe, Account- Legacy for Users. able, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Inter- Users’’ or ‘‘SAFETEA–LU’’. governmental (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act relations. 23 USC 101 note. is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. General definitions. TITLE I—FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS Subtitle A—Authorization of Programs Sec. 1101. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 1102. Obligation ceiling. Sec. 1103. Apportionments. Sec. 1104. Equity bonus program. Sec. 1105. Revenue aligned budget authority. Sec. 1106. Future Interstate System routes. Sec. 1107. Metropolitan planning. Sec. 1108. Transfer of highway and transit funds. Sec. 1109. Recreational trails. Sec. 1110. Temporary traffic control devices. Sec. 1111. Set-asides for Interstate discretionary projects. Sec. 1112. Emergency relief. Sec. 1113. Surface transportation program. Sec. 1114. Highway bridge program.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts from Oil Exploration and Production: Summary of MDT's Efforts
    State Highway System: Eastern Montana Impacts from Oil Exploration & Production: Summary of MDT’s Efforts Executive Summary In the past 5 years there have been increasing oil and natural gas extraction activities in eastern Montana. This oil-related activity has resulted in more commercial vehicle traffic and has accelerated infrastructure deterioration road network that MDT maintains. To better understand and respond to the impacts of oil exploration in eastern Montana, MDT has conducted seven distinct studies—two corridor studies, one safety audit, three traffic estimations studies and one pavement analysis. Based on these analyses, the estimated transportation impacts attributable to energy extraction activities are: $52 million dollars per year for twenty years to address pavement needs. On some oil region highways, AADT will almost double in the next 15 years. While commercial vehicle traffic trends were nearly flat historically, increases of 130% in oil region counties since 2007 are noted. This growth is projected to continue in the next 15 years. Population may increase by 30,000 in MDT’s Glendive District by 2035, with most of the growth in the northeast portion of the district.1 20 ±10 oil drilling rigs are estimated to be active in the region over the next 15 years. To date, MDT has made the following improvements and adjustments in designs and policies to meet the evolving needs in the region. MDT had expended $5.2 million in project change orders to specifically increase the base depth and to increase asphalt thickness on projects let to contract. MDT has added passing lanes, increased shoulder widths and added centerline rumble strips on Montana Highway 16 north of Glendive.
    [Show full text]