DOCSLIB.ORG

General Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Index GENERAL INDEX Absyrtus 34 7 Allecto 106, 109 Achates 180 Allius (in Catullus) 107-8 Achelous 288, 292, 301 Alpheus 284 Achilles 128, 249, 288-89 + n. 53, Althea 291 289, 317' 322, 394-96 Amata 106-7, 109 Acmon 322 Amor(es) 242, 405 Acoetes 265-66, 292 see also Cupid Acontius 137-38 Amphimedon 241 Acrisius 289 anachronisms 280, 316, 320, 377, Actaeon 262-64, 379-80, 433 422 Actium, battle of 204 Romanizing 306, 315, 325 Adonis 286, 377 analepsis see flashback adynaton/ a 342, 365-66, 374 Ancaeus 377 Aeacus 284 Anchises 179, 223 Aeneas 128, 206, 312, 326, 437 ancile 224-25, 230 apotheosis of 199-200, 311-12, Andromeda 240-42, 244, 289 321-27, 329 Anna (sister of Dido) 180-81 in Fasti 179-80, 182, 203, 212, Anna Perenna 172, 183, 198, 214, 230 213 n. 43, 397 in Met. 309-12, 322-24, 326-27 identified with Anna, sister of Dido Virgil's 128, 179-80, 207, 240-42, 180 244-45, 249, 263, 289, 396 Antimachus 50 Aesacus 307, 318-19, 326 Antinous 242 Aeschylus 130, 259, 267 Antony, Marc (Marcus Antonius) 8, see also tragedy, Greek 197 n. 2, 206 Aesculapius 173-74 Aphrodite 173, 212 Aetas Ovidiana 413, 422 see also Venus see also Ovid, medieval reception of; Apollo 11-12, 47, 67, 84, 163, Ovid, works of, s.v. transmission 177-78, 184, 186, 230, 376, 437 Aethion 241 Callimachean 28, 175 aetiology 174-75, 178, 193-95, oracle of, at Delos 263 208-9, 213, 248, 252, 257, 274, oracle of, at Delphi 240, 250, 253, 276-77, 318-19, 324, 326, 398 263 see also 'aition' in Met. 246-51, 254-55, 287, Aglauros 279, 379-80 402-3 aition 152-53, 169, 172, 175, 180, Apollonius of Rhodes 79, 79 n. 272, 212 n. 39, 219-21, 225 n. 71, 226, 80 n. 274, 83 + n. 287, 128, 245, 228 + n. 77, 229-30, 275-76, 401, 249, 251' 266 404, 428 + n. 32 apotheosis II Ajax 262 see also Aeneas; Augustus; Julius Alban kings 305, 326-27 Caesar; Romulus Alcithoe 25 7 Aquilo 436 Alcmene 316 Arachne 276, 292-97, 301, 313, Alcyone see Ceyx and 379-80 Alexandria, conquest of 206 Aratus 174, 277 "Alexandrian footnote" 303, 404 + Arcadia 179, 190, 219 n. 35 Ardea 324-25, 327 GENERAL INDEX 521 Arellius Fuscus 8 n. 19 Bacchus 47, 107, 258-67, 289 Arethusa (in Prop. 4.3) 117, 126 Bagoas 94 Arethusa (nymph) 272, 283-85 Bellona 242 Argo 346-47 Berenice (in Callimachus) 208 Argus 274-75, 279 Boreas 290 Ariadne 47, 53-54, 129-30, 177, 430 Briseis 128 + n. 45, 373 in Catullus 54, 103-4, 129, 177, Busiris 367 412 Byblis 82 + n. 279, 88, 139 n. 80, Arion 182, 184 379 Aristaeus 224 Arruns 241 Cacus 189-92, 247 Artemis 377 Cadmus 240, 262-65, 267 see also Diana caelum (in caelo esse) 334-35 Ascanius 178 Caeneus 288-89 Asclepius 403-5 Caieta 321 see also Aesculapius calendar, Roman 20-21 + n. 57, Atalanta and Hippomenes 285 22, 168, 170-73, 193, 197-98, 204 Atedius Melior (in Statius) 398-403 n. 22, 211-13, 216, 223-24 Athamas 262 - events and rites celebrated in: Athis (in Catullus) 243 Agonalia 211 Athis and Lycabas 242-43 Agonium 172 Atlas 192 Argei 213 n. 42 Attis 406 Carmentalia 179, 183, 186 Atys 243 Caristia 216 Augustus 1-2, 4, 7, 9-10, 12, 13 Cerealia 212 n. 39 n. 34, 16-20, 21 + n. 58, 22 + Compitalia 183, 217 n. 62, 23 + nn. 65 + 67, 24-25, Feralia 180, 185 113, 115-16, 146, 155-56, 161-62, Feriae Sementivae 171, 183 165, 167-68, 171-72, 176-77, 183, F1oralia 183, 212 194, 197, 201 + nn. 11 + 13, 202, Fordicidia 212 n. 39, 215 n. 49, 281-82, 331-32, 334, 337, 357, 225 392, 407, 409, 412, 415, 417-18, Fornacalia 217, 228 433 lavatio, at Veneralia 215 + n. 48 apotheosis of 16 n. 45, 329, 370 Lemuria 185, 216 as Pater Patriae 23, 181, 185, Liberalia 183 201-2 + n. 14 Lupercalia 182 n. 51, 218-19, 221, etymology/anniversary of name 25, 331 183, 186, 200 - nakedness of Luperci during in Met. 14-15, 16 n. 45, 199, 172, 219, 228 n. 77 250, 273, 306, 311, 320-21, lustratio 402-3 - at Parilia 215 marriage laws of 13-14 + n. 39, - by censors 218 n. 55 113-14, 145, 155-57, 202, 337, - by Luperci 218 + n. 55 355 n. 71 Matronalia 11, 211, 220 Res Gestae of 369 Megalesia 183 viewed in exile poetry 14 n. 41, October horse 215 n. 49 19, 340, 351, 354-55, 358-59, Parentalia 179-80, 182-83, 216 366-73, 377 n. 137, 393, 397 Parilia 169, 170, 213 n. 43, 215, - see also apotheosis; Gaius Caesar 217-18, 220-22, 225, 331 Aura/ aura 291 Quirinalia 202 l'aura (in Petrarch) 439 Regifugium 183, 185 autopsy, claims/denial of by Ovid Saturnalia 143 213 n. 43, 220, 226, 229 + n. 80, Sigillaria 11 303 Terminalia 183, 217 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ancient Religions: Public Worship of the Greeks and Romans by E.M
    Ancient Religions: Public worship of the Greeks and Romans By E.M. Berens, adapted by Newsela staff on 10.07.16 Word Count 1,250 Level 1190L TOP: The temple and oracle of Apollo, called the Didymaion in Didyma, an ancient Greek sanctuary on the coast of Ionia (now Turkey), Wikimedia Commons. MIDDLE: The copper statue of Zeus of Artemision in the National Archaeological Museum, Athens, Greece. BOTTOM: Engraving shows the Oracle of Delphi, bathed in shaft of light atop a pedestal and surrounded by cloaked figures, Delphi, Greece. Getty Images. Temples Long ago, the Greeks had no shrines or sanctuaries for public worship. They performed their devotions beneath the vast and boundless canopy of heaven, in the great temple of nature itself. Believing that their gods lived above in the clouds, worshippers naturally searched for the highest available points to place themselves in the closest communion possible with their gods. Therefore, the summits of high mountains were selected for devotional purposes. The inconvenience of worshipping outdoors gradually suggested the idea of building temples that would offer shelter from bad weather. These first temples were of the most simple form, without decoration. As the Greeks became a wealthy and powerful people, temples were built and adorned with great splendor and magnificence. So massively were they constructed that some of them have withstood the ravages of This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. time. The city of Athens especially contains numerous remains of these buildings of antiquity. These ruins are most valuable since they are sufficiently complete to enable archaeologists to study the plan and character of the original structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript 6
    Transcript What was the Parentalia? Dr Emma-Jayne Graham: The Parentalia was a nine-day Roman festival that took place every year between 13th and 21st February. During the festival families would gather together to celebrate, to remember and to appease the dead. Initially in their homes but also in the cemetery. The main purpose of the Parentalia seems to have been to make sure that the restless dead were content in the afterlife. That they stayed in their graves and that they didn’t terrorise the living. The first eight days of the Parentalia saw people in their homes performing rituals of purification. And for this reason we know very little about these private aspects of the festival. But, on the final day, known as the Feralia they would congregate in the cemetery and honour the dead with a very public display of offerings, of prayers and of flowers. Culminating in a great banquet held right there in the cemetery outside the tomb and in the company of their ancestors. And some tombs were equipped with small ovens. Meaning that fresh bread could be made right there on the spot ready for the occasion. And individual graves also sometimes had tubes inserted into them so that the dead could receive their share of the wine, of the honey and of the bread that their relatives were enjoying. The poet Ovid writes about the Parentalia in his work on the Roman calendar and he describes it as an inauspicious time for business and for weddings. Because it was a moment when the unlucky shades of the dead were very close to the world of the living.
    [Show full text]
  • Juno Covella, Perpetual Calendar of the Fellowship of Isis By: Lawrence Durdin-Robertson All Formatting Has Been Retained from the Original
    Fellowship of Isis Homepage http://www.fellowshipofisis.com Juno Covella, Perpetual Calendar of the Fellowship of Isis By: Lawrence Durdin-Robertson All formatting has been retained from the original. Goddesses appear in BOLD CAPITAL letters. The Month of April APRIL 1st Roman: CERES. (Brewer, Dict.) "April Fool Perhaps it may be a relic of the Roman 'Cerealia', held at the beginning of April". See also under April 12th. Roman: CONCORDIA, VENUS and FORTUNA; The Veneralia. (Seyffert, Dict.) "Concordia . The goddess Concordia was also invoked with Venus and Fortuna, by married women on the 1st of April". (Ovid, Fasti, IV. 133) "April 1st Duly do ye worship the goddess (i.e. -Venus), ye Latin mothers and brides, and ye, too, who wear not the fillets and long robe (Frazer: 'courtesans'). Take off the golden necklaces from the marble neck of the goddess; take off her gauds; the goddess must be washed from top to toe. Then dry her neck and restore to it her golden necklaces; now give her other flowers, now give her the fresh-blown rose. Ye, too, she herself bids bathe under the green myrtle. Learn now why ye give incense to Fortuna Virilis in the place which reeks of warm water. All women strip when they enter that place Propitiate her with suplications; beauty and fortune and good fame are in her keeping". (Plutarch, Lives, Numa) on the month of April; "the women bathe on the calends, or first day of it, with myrtle garlands on their heads." (Philocalus, Kal. Anno 345) "April 1. Veneralia Ludi. (Montfaucon, Antiq.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Roman Calendar Dwayne Meisner, University of Regina
    The Evolution of the Roman Calendar Dwayne Meisner, University of Regina Abstract The Roman calendar was first developed as a lunar | 290 calendar, so it was difficult for the Romans to reconcile this with the natural solar year. In 45 BC, Julius Caesar reformed the calendar, creating a solar year of 365 days with leap years every four years. This article explains the process by which the Roman calendar evolved and argues that the reason February has 28 days is that Caesar did not want to interfere with religious festivals that occurred in February. Beginning as a lunar calendar, the Romans developed a lunisolar system that tried to reconcile lunar months with the solar year, with the unfortunate result that the calendar was often inaccurate by up to four months. Caesar fixed this by changing the lengths of most months, but made no change to February because of the tradition of intercalation, which the article explains, and because of festivals that were celebrated in February that were connected to the Roman New Year, which had originally been on March 1. Introduction The reason why February has 28 days in the modern calendar is that Caesar did not want to interfere with festivals that honored the dead, some of which were Past Imperfect 15 (2009) | © | ISSN 1711-053X | eISSN 1718-4487 connected to the position of the Roman New Year. In the earliest calendars of the Roman Republic, the year began on March 1, because the consuls, after whom the year was named, began their years in office on the Ides of March.
    [Show full text]
  • VIII Part of His Work Le Tibre, Fleuve De Rome Dans L'antiquite, 1953)
    VIII THE GODDESS CERES AND HER ROMAN MYSTERIES France continues to enrich us with books, doctos, Jupiter, et laboriosos, on the history of Roman religion and dealing with individual gods and goddesses. We have had in succession A. Bruhl on Liber Pater (1953), J. le Gall on Tiberinus Pater (in the second part of his work Le Tibre, fleuve de Rome dans l'Antiquite, 1953), R. Schilling on Venus (1954), J. Gage on Roman Apollo (1955), and now H. le Bonniec has joined them with a book of nearly five hundred pages on the goddess Ceres.1 And it is no wonder that with such men as Jean Bayet and Georges Dumezilleading the way, to name only those to whom this particular author owes so much, many young French classicists should have been stirred to study the history of Roman religion. It is a phenomenon of which we outsiders gratefully reap the fruits. Now I had good reason indeed to read this book with special interest. Twelve years ago I investigated the real meaning of the expression Initia Cereris and devoted eighteen pages to what I thought was the answer. 2 Le Bonniec repeatedly refers to this short article,3 with the purpose it seems of refuting it, as it befits a disciple of Dumezil, of course because I had dared in this 'etude tres suggestive' (p. 28) to attribute the origin of the goddess Ceres to some numen of fertility. '11 n'est pas de these plus fausse', so we read at the conclusion of the first part,' 'que celle qui pretend rendre compte, a partir de numina specialises, de la genese des grandes divinites romaines.' Here I must point out, or rather repeat, that I have nowhere maintained that all the Roman gods 1 Henri Le Bonniec, Le Culte de Ceres a Rome (Etudes et Commentait'es XXVII), Paris, Klincksieck, 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grave Goods of Roman Hierapolis
    THE GRAVE GOODS OF ROMAN HIERAPOLIS AN ANALYSIS OF THE FINDS FROM FOUR MULTIPLE BURIAL TOMBS Hallvard Indgjerd Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History University of Oslo This thesis is submitted for the degree of Master of Arts June 2014 The Grave Goods of Roman Hierapolis ABSTRACT The Hellenistic and Roman city of Hierapolis in Phrygia, South-Western Asia Minor, boasts one of the largest necropoleis known from the Roman world. While the grave monuments have seen long-lasting interest, few funerary contexts have been subject to excavation and publication. The present study analyses the artefact finds from four tombs, investigating the context of grave gifts and funerary practices with focus on the Roman imperial period. It considers to what extent the finds influence and reflect varying identities of Hierapolitan individuals over time. Combined, the tombs use cover more than 1500 years, paralleling the life-span of the city itself. Although the material is far too small to give a conclusive view of funerary assem- blages in Hierapolis, the attempted close study and contextual integration of the objects does yield some results with implications for further studies of funerary contexts on the site and in the wider region. The use of standard grave goods items, such as unguentaria, lamps and coins, is found to peak in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD. Clay unguentaria were used alongside glass ones more than a century longer than what is usually seen outside of Asia Minor, and this period saw the development of new forms, partially resembling Hellenistic types. Some burials did not include any grave gifts, and none were extraordinarily rich, pointing towards a standardised, minimalistic set of funerary objects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Cemetery at Ostia/Portus As a Lived Environment Author: E-J Graham Pages: 133–143
    Paper Information: Title: The Quick and the Dead in the Extra-Urban Landscape: The Roman Cemetery at Ostia/Portus as a Lived Environment Author: E-J Graham Pages: 133–143 DOI: http://doi.org/10.16995/TRAC2004_133_143 Publication Date: 31 March 2005 Volume Information: Bruhn, J., Croxford, B., and Grigoropoulos, D. (eds) 2005. TRAC 2004: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Durham 2004. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Copyright and Hardcopy Editions: The following paper was originally published in print format by Oxbow Books for TRAC. Hard copy editions of this volume may still be available, and can be purchased direct from Oxbow at http://www.oxbowbooks.com. TRAC has now made this paper available as Open Access through an agreement with the publisher. Copyright remains with TRAC and the individual author(s), and all use or quotation of this paper and/or its contents must be acknowledged. This paper was released in digital Open Access format in April 2013. The quick and the dead in the extra-urban landscape: the Roman cemetery at Ostia/Portus as a lived environment E-J Graham Introduction The urban cemeteries of the Roman world have often been described as ‘cities of the dead.’ The organisational and structural similarities between the so-called ‘streets of tombs’ which developed on the outskirts of major Italian urban areas such as Rome, Ostia and Pompeii, and the spaces within the city walls themselves have been highlighted by scholars wishing to demonstrate that the living city ‘found its double in these ‘cities of the dead’’ (Koortbojian, 1996: 232).
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalia Tu Accusas ! Restituting the Ancient Date of Caesar’S Funus*
    LIBERALIA TU ACCUSAS ! RESTITUTING THE ANCIENT DATE OF CAESAR’S FUNUS* Francesco CAROTTA**, Arne EICKENBERG*** Résumé. – Du récit unanime des anciens historiographes il ressort que le funus de Jules César eut lieu le 17 mars 44 av. J.-C. Or la communauté académique moderne prétend presque aussi unanimement que cette date est erronée, sans s’accorder cependant sur une alternative. Dans la littérature scientifique on donne des dates entre le 18 et le 23, et plus précisément le 20 mars, en s’appuyant sur la chronologie avancée par Drumann et Groebe. L’analyse des sources historiques et des évènements qui suivirent l’assassinat de César jusqu’à ses funérailles, prouve que les auteurs anciens ne s’étaient pas trompés, et que Groebe avait reconnu la méprise de Drumann mais avait évité de l’amender. La correction de cette erreur invétérée va permettre de mieux examiner le contexte politique et religieux des funérailles de César. Abstract. – 17 March 44 BCE results from the reports by the ancient historiographers as to the date of Julius Caesar’s funus. However, today’s academic community has consistetly claimed that they were all mistaken, however, an alternative has not been agreed on. Dates between 18 and 23 March have been suggested in scientific literature—mostly 20 March, which is the date based on the chronology supplied by Drumann and Groebe. The analysis of the historical sources and of the events following Caesar’s murder until his funeral proves that the ancient writers were right, and that Groebe had recognized Drumann’s false dating, but avoided to adjust it.
    [Show full text]
  • And Rome's Legacies
    Christianity AND ROME’S LEGACIES Old Religions New Testament MARK MAKES HIS MARK NOT SO SIMPLE TEMPLES IN PARTNERSHIP WITH christianity_FC.indd 1 3/6/17 3:32 PM 2 Religions in Rome The earliest Romans saw their gods as spirits or powerful forces of nature. These gods did not have personalities or emotions or act in any other way like human beings. However, as Rome began to build an empire, the Romans were exposed to new ideas. Through contact with the Greeks, the Romans’ idea of gods and goddesses changed. The Greeks believed in gods and god- desses who behaved very much like human beings. Their gods could be jeal- ous, angry, passionate, kind, foolish, or petty. The Romans borrowed this idea u THE ROMANS People did not go to and honey, burned honored their gods a temple to worship sweet-smelling from the Greeks. They even borrowed by building temples. the god. Rather, a incense, and sac- some of the Greek gods and goddesses. Inside each temple temple was where rificed animals to No longer were the Roman gods spir- was a statue of a priests made honor the god. god or goddess. offerings of cakes its or forces of nature. They were now divine and human at the same time. u UNTIL THE in private people 300s CE, the Roman were free to think u THE ROMANS wisdom. During festival day, priests ticular, no legal religion was a and say what they honored their gods Cerealia, Romans performed rituals work was allowed. state religion. wanted to. Over with more than 100 honored the god- and sacrifices Celebrations includ- The emperor was time, the emperor festivals every year.
    [Show full text]
  • April 1 – a Day with a Long History of European Tradition and Mischief
    April 1 – a day with a long history of European tradition and mischief March 30, 2012 By U.S. Army Europe Public Affairs Tweet HEIDELBERG, Germany -- April Fool’s Day is this weekend, and that means mischief. Social Media Facebook But where did it all begin? Across Europe there are many explanations for this day of pranks, and many ways of…er…celebrating…the day. Twitter Flickr Here are some bits of European April Fool’s lore and lunacy: YouTube Some historians suggest that the tradition began with ancient festivals such as Hilaria, celebrated by the Romans at the end of March and Saturnalia in late December, both of which included celebrations involving play acting and costumes. Some speculate that the day was once tied to the vernal equinox -- the first day of spring in the northern hemisphere -- when Mother Nature fooled people by sending them changing, unpredictable weather. British folklore traces April Fool’s Day to the Gotham, the “town of fools” in Nottinghamshire. Legend has it that because 13th-century tradition made any road used by the king public property, the citizens of Gotham spread a false story designed to stop King John from passing through their town. The king found out about their deception, however, and sent a messenger to the town to demand an explanation. What the messenger found in Gotham was a town that appeared to be engaged in foolish activities such as drowning fish or attempting to cage birds in roofless pens. Of course it was all an act, but it tricked the king, who declared Gotham too foolish to punish.
    [Show full text]
  • Magic in Private and Public Lives of the Ancient Romans
    COLLECTANEA PHILOLOGICA XXIII, 2020: 53–72 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.23.04 Idaliana KACZOR Uniwersytet Łódzki MAGIC IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LIVES OF THE ANCIENT ROMANS The Romans practiced magic in their private and public life. Besides magical practices against the property and lives of people, the Romans also used generally known and used protective and healing magic. Sometimes magical practices were used in official religious ceremonies for the safety of the civil and sacral community of the Romans. Keywords: ancient magic practice, homeopathic magic, black magic, ancient Roman religion, Roman religious festivals MAGIE IM PRIVATEN UND ÖFFENTLICHEN LEBEN DER ALTEN RÖMER Die Römer praktizierten Magie in ihrem privaten und öffentlichen Leben. Neben magische Praktik- en gegen das Eigentum und das Leben von Menschen, verwendeten die Römer auch allgemein bekannte und verwendete Schutz- und Heilmagie. Manchmal wurden magische Praktiken in offiziellen religiösen Zeremonien zur Sicherheit der bürgerlichen und sakralen Gemeinschaft der Römer angewendet. Schlüsselwörter: alte magische Praxis, homöopathische Magie, schwarze Magie, alte römi- sche Religion, Römische religiöse Feste Magic, despite our sustained efforts at defining this term, remains a slippery and obscure concept. It is uncertain how magic has been understood and practised in differ- ent cultural contexts and what the difference is (if any) between magical and religious praxis. Similarly, no satisfactory and all-encompassing definition of ‘magic’ exists. It appears that no singular concept of ‘magic’ has ever existed: instead, this polyvalent notion emerged at the crossroads of local custom, religious praxis, superstition, and politics of the day. Individual scholars of magic, positioning themselves as ostensi- bly objective observers (an etic perspective), mostly defined magic in opposition to religion and overemphasised intercultural parallels over differences1.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Roman Female Suicide. Phd Thesis
    GUILT, REDEMPTION AND RECEPTION: REPRESENTING ROMAN FEMALE SUICIDE ELEANOR RUTH GLENDINNING, BA (Hons) MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy DECEMBER 2011 Abstract This thesis examines representations of Roman female suicide in a variety of genres and periods from the history and poetry of the Augustan age (especially Livy, Ovid, Horace, Propertius and Vergil), through the drama and history of the early Principate (particularly Seneca and Tacitus), to some of the Church fathers (Tertullian, Jerome and Augustine) and martyr acts of Late Antiquity. The thesis explores how the highly ambiguous and provocative act of female suicide was developed, adapted and reformulated in historical, poetic, dramatic and political narratives. The writers of antiquity continually appropriated this controversial motif in order to comment on and evoke debates about issues relating to the moral, social and political concerns of their day: the ethics of a voluntary death, attitudes towards female sexuality, the uses and abuses of power, and traditionally expected female behaviour. In different literary contexts, and in different periods of Roman history, writers and thinkers engaged in this same intellectual exercise by utilising the suicidal female figure in their works. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Arts and Humanities Research Council for providing the financial assistance necessary for me to carry out this research. The Roman Society also awarded a bursary that allowed me to undertake research at the Fondation Hardt pour I'etude de I'antiquite classique, in Geneva, Switzerland (June 2009). I am also grateful for the CAS Gender Histories bursary award which aided me while making revisions to the original thesis.
    [Show full text]