History of Aircraft Designation Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of Aircraft Designation Systems UNITED STATES NAVAL AVIATION 1910–1995 451 APPENDIX 5 Aircraft Designations and Popular Names Background on the Evolution of Aircraft Designations Aircraft model designation history is very complex. by a number to indicate the individual plane of that In order to fully understand the designations, it is type-manufacturer. Under this system: important to know the factors that played a role in developing the different missions that aircraft have been “A” was used for Curtiss hydroaeroplanes “B” for Wright hydroaeroplanes called upon to perform. Technological changes affect- “C” for Curtiss flying boats ing aircraft capabilities have resulted in corresponding “D” for Burgess flying boats changes in the operational capabilities and techniques “E” for Curtiss amphibian flying boats employed by the aircraft. Prior to World War I, the Navy tried various schemes for designating aircraft. This system had been established in 1911 by Captain In the early period of naval aviation a system was Washington I. Chambers, Director of Naval Aviation. developed to designate an aircraft’s mission. Different The following is a list of the types of aircraft and their aircraft class designations evolved for the various types designations in existence from 1911–1914: of missions performed by naval aircraft. This became known as the Aircraft Class Designation System. Aircraft Designation System 1911–1914 Numerous changes have been made to this system since the inception of naval aviation in 1911. A-1 Curtiss hydroaeroplane (originally an amphib- While reading this section various references will be ian, and the Navy’s first airplane) made to the Aircraft Class Designation System, A-2 Curtiss landplane (rebuilt as a hydroaeroplane) Designation of Aircraft, Model Designation of Naval A-3 Curtiss hydroaeroplane Aircraft, Aircraft Designation System, and Model A-4 Curtiss hydroaeroplane Designation of Military Aircraft. All of these references B-1 Wright landplane (converted to hydroaeroplane) refer to the same system involved in designating air- B-2 Wright type hydroaeroplane craft classes. This system is then used to develop the B-3 Wright type hydroaeroplane specific designations assigned to each type of aircraft C-1 Curtiss flying boat operated by the Navy. The F3F-4, TBF-1, AD-3, PBY- C-2 Curtiss flying boat 5A, A-4, A-6E, and F/A-18C are all examples of specif- C-3 Curtiss flying boat ic types of naval aircraft designations which were C-4 Curtiss flying boat developed from the Aircraft Class Designation System. C-5 Curtiss flying boat D-1 Burgess Co. and Curtiss flying boat D-2 Burgess Co. and Curtiss flying boat Aircraft Class Designation System E-1 OWL (over water and land) (a Curtiss hydro- aeroplane rebuilt as a short-hulled flying boat for fly- ing over water or land and fitted with wheels for use Early Period of Naval Aviation up to 1920 as an amphibian) The uncertainties during the early period of naval A new Aircraft Class Designation System was estab- aviation were reflected by the problems encountered lished by Captain Mark L. Bristol, the second Director in settling on a functional system for designating naval of Naval Aviation. He assumed the Director’s position aircraft. Prior to 1920 two different Aircraft Class from Captain Chambers in December 1913. The new Designation Systems were used. From 1911 up to system was issued on 27 March 1914 as General Order 1914, naval aircraft were identified by a single letter 88, “Designation of Air Craft.” This system changed the indicating the general type and manufacturer, followed original designation of the aircraft to two letters and a 451 452 UNITED STATES NAVAL AVIATION 1910–1995 number, of which the first letter denoted class; the sec- or construction. Class letters assigned to the Z types ond, type within a class; and the number the order in were R for rigid, N for nonrigid, and K for kite. By which aircraft within the class were acquired. The four combining the type and class designation, the different classes set up on 27 March 1914 are as follows: airships in the Navy’s inventory could be categorized. As an example: Aircraft Designation System, 1914–1920 ZR referred to rigid dirigibles (airships) Aircraft Classes ZN stood for nonrigid airships “A” for heavier-than-air craft. Within the “A” class: ZK for kite balloons L stood for land machines The class letters assigned to the heavier-than-air H stood for hydroaeroplanes vehicles covered a wider range and generally reflected B stood for flying boats the mission responsibilities of the aircraft classes. Class X stood for combination land and water machines letters assigned to the V types were: (amphibians) C stood for convertibles (could be equipped as F for fighting either land or water machines) O for observation “D” for airships or dirigibles S for scouting “B” for balloons P for patrol “K” for kites T for torpedo Under this new system the A-1 aircraft (the Navy’s first G for fleet (utility) airplane) was redesignated AH-1, with the “A” identify- ing the plane as a heavier-than-air craft and the “H” By combining the V designation for heavier-than-air standing for hydroaeroplane. General Order No. 88 vehicles with the class letters, the following aircraft also provided a corresponding link between the old class definitions were assigned in 1920: aircraft designations and the new system: “The aero- VF for fighting plane planes now in the service are hereby designated as VO for observation plane follows: VS for scouting plane A-1 became the AH-1 VP for patrol plane A-2 became the AH-2 VT for torpedo and bombing plane A-3 became the AH-3 VG for fleet plane (most likely a general utility B-1 became the AH-4 aircraft) B-2 became the AH-5 This class designation system for aircraft has contin- B-3 became the AH-6 ued to remain a functional system and is still used today. C-1 became the AB-1 There have been many additions, deletions, and major C-2 became the AB-2 changes to the system over the years but the concept C-3 became the AB-3 has remained intact. The current naval aircraft inventory C-4 became the AB-4 C-5 became the AB-5 still lists VF, VS, VP, VG, VO, and VT aircraft classes. D-1 became the AB-6 Three of these, VF, VP, and VO, still have the same defi- D-2 became the AB-7 nitions they were assigned in 1920. The VS, VG, and VT E-1 became the AX-1” aircraft class designations now refer to antisubmarine (VS), in-flight refueling (VG), and training aircraft (VT). Despite the phrase, “now in the service,” the A-1, B- The aircraft designation system established in July 1 and B-2 and probably the D-1 had ceased to exist 1920 by General Order 541 was modified on 29 before the order was issued. March 1922 by Bureau of Aeronautics Technical Note 213. It added the identity of the manufacturer to the The Early 1920s aircraft model designation. The aircraft class designa- In General Order 541, issued in 1920, two overall tions remained the same as those issued by General types of aircraft were identified and assigned perma- Order 541 (G.O. 541); however, besides the six air- nent letters which have remained in effect since 1920. craft classes listed in G.O. 541 (VF, VO, VS, VP, VT, Lighter-than-air types were identified by the letter Z and VG), an additional two classes were added to the and heavier-than-air types were assigned the letter V. aircraft class list. The two new aircraft classes were Within these two categories, various class letters were VA for Training Aircraft and VM for Marine assigned to further differentiate the aircraft’s operation Expeditionary Plane. UNITED STATES NAVAL AVIATION 1910–1995 453 The mid to late 1920s than-air, the second letter identified the primary mis- sion of the aircraft, using the same 10 letter designa- Between 1922 and 1933, there were only a few tions listed in the above paragraph. The third letter modifications to the Aircraft Class Designation indicated the secondary mission of the aircraft class, System. The Bureau of Aeronautics was established such as: in July 1921 and, thereafter, made changes to the Aircraft Class Designation System. In response to a F for fighting Secretary of Navy letter dated 13 February 1923, the O for observation Bureau of Aeronautics issued a Technical Note on 10 B for bombing March 1923 that changed the VA designation for T for torpedo training aircraft to VN, dropped the VG designation, S for scouting and added the VJ designation for Transport Plane. This was followed by the addition, in 1925, of the By assigning these five secondary mission letters to VX designation for experimental aircraft. The VX the primary aircraft letter designations, seven new designation was dropped from the Aircraft Class aircraft class designations were established: Designation list in January 1927. In July 1928, the VBF for bombing-fighting VM designation was dropped and the VJ designation VOS for observation-scouting was changed from Transportation Plane to General VPB for patrol-bombing Utility. Two new designations were also instituted, VPT for patrol-torpedo VB for bombing and VH for ambulance. A new air- VSB for scouting-bombing craft class was added in July 1930 and assigned the VSO for scout-observation designation VR for transport aircraft. This VR desig- VTB for torpedo-bombing nation has remained in effect for transport aircraft since 1930. On the eve of World War II, the Model Designation of Airplanes for 1 July 1939 was very similar to what had been identified in 1934.
Recommended publications
  • Sir Francis Beaufort Papers Addenda
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8gm8cxr No online items Sir Francis Beaufort papers addenda Finding aid prepared by Gayle M. Richardson. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © 2016 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Sir Francis Beaufort papers mssFBA 1-28 1 addenda Descriptive Summary Title: Sir Francis Beaufort papers addenda Dates: 1797-1858 Collection Number: mssFBA 1-28 Creator OR Collector: Beaufort, Francis, Sir, 1774-1857 Extent: 37 items in one box Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: Correspondence, documents, photographs, poems and wills relating to Sir Francis Beaufort, Maria Edgeworth and the Beaufort and Edgeworth families. Language of Material: The records are in English. Access Open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, contact Reader Services. Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities. The responsibility for identifying the copyright holder, if there is one, and obtaining necessary permissions rests with the researcher. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Sir Francis Beaufort papers addenda, The Huntington Library, San Marino, California. Acquisition Information Purchased from Francis Beaufort-Palmer, June 4, 1971. Biographical Note Admiral Sir Francis Beaufort: hydrographer of the British Navy and member of the Royal Society, creator of the wind force scale and weather notation coding, and author of Karamania, or, A brief description of the south coast of Asia-Minor and of the remains of antiquity (1817).
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
    Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts The overall goal of aviation activity forecasting is to prepare forecasts that accurately reflect current conditions, relevant historic trends, and provide reasonable projections of future activity, which can be translated into specific airport facility needs anticipated during the next twenty years and beyond. Introduction This chapter provides updated forecasts of aviation activity for Kittitas County Airport – Bowers Field (ELN) for the twenty-year master plan horizon (2015-2035). The most recent FAA-approved aviation activity forecasts for Bowers Field were prepared in 2011 for the Airfield Needs Assessment project. Those forecasts evaluated changes in local conditions and activity that occurred since the previous master plan forecasts were prepared in 2000, and re-established base line conditions. The Needs Assessment forecasts provide the “accepted” airport-specific projections that are most relevant for comparison with the new master plan forecasts prepared for this chapter. The forecasts presented in this chapter are consistent with Bowers Field’s current and historic role as a community/regional general aviation airport. Bowers Field is the only airport in Kittitas County capable of accommodating a full range of general aviation activity, including business class turboprops and business jets. This level of capability expands the airport’s role to serve the entire county and the local Ellensburg community. The intent is to provide an updated set of aviation demand projections for Bowers Field that will permit airport management to make the decisions necessary to maintain a viable, efficient, and cost-effective facility that meets the area’s air transportation needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Safety Digest May 1989
    The First Two Minutes The author reviews problems that have confronted flight crews during the critical takeoff phase and concludes that the accident record would improve considerably if as much attention is paid to the prevention of takeoff emergencies as to the response to them. by Gerard M. Bruggink Worldwide accident statistics show consistently that sented here. Nor does it follow that the recent primacy most air-carrier accidents occur in the approach and of takeoff accidents in the United States could not have landing phase of flight. In the same statistics, takeoff been duplicated elsewhere in the world; it so happens accidents are next in frequency of occurrence. Accord- that the U.S. accident data are the most-readily avail- ing to a recent study by Captain Caesar1, these two able for analysis — at least to this writer. phases of operation accounted for 80 percent of the 370 total losses of jet transports in the 1959-1987 period: Within the limited scope of this discussion it is suffi- 57 percent occurred during approach and landing; 23 cient to realize that the prominence of takeoff accidents percent during takeoff. as the greatest loss-producer in the United States during the past five years was brought about by two factors: The predominance of approach and landing (A&L) ac- cidents is confirmed by the fatal jet transport accident • The remarkable decline of A&L accidents over experience of U.S. air carriers over the last two decades the last 20 years, and (1968-1987). Of the 67 fatal accidents in that time frame, 33 (50 percent) were A&L accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Ntsb/Aas-64-Aa
    , I (j (. .1 u!) \J _l'·,· ~ABLE OF CONTENTS A. INT~ODUCTION 1 . Rcvie1-1 u f in;1'tents 2. T11,pl·:::r:cn ta ti on of Requirements b., Re.so luUoI~ of Conflicts c <· Consider a t,iorJ rif Avc:.ilable Research J, Considerat icn of Past Di.fficultie:3 et Aircraft CcckFits Accide~i/Incia2nt Re2ord 6 Conclusions C .. CREd COMP.LEHZ!~T l.. Review of 11.eq1.iirements ;::i, Views of the Industry a. Ma~uf2cturers ~~ Air Carriers c. 1·'!.:.:Uu.:·:J.l Avi at.ion Agency cL. .Pilot Organization e., Flisht Eng:inc:er Organization h. Conclusions .D. cnn·.r DUTIE.S 1. Review of ~equirements 2. Views of the Industry a. Manufacturers b .. Air Carriers c. FBricral Aviation Agency d, Military e, Flight Engi.near On.;..n] za ti on f. Pilot Organization 000002 Evalua 1:.ion Conclusions I l. e.. Fi..-:.. J.\.FI?ENDI CES II. TJ, S. J.._i-:: C:::.2'.'rie~ l~:.r..:i.Je'."'_t.s f'::.r 1J 1~riod cfo.:,.;:-::1v .July =...> ~964 - 'L-;_:rbcjet Aircr:;.ft J.11' r.·;.:;:: ~·=-:·:~-= B·::a_-l.:'..::::"~'.:':":. ~Tr: s -:~:; te1--,lis:-~:::d by BAC-ll.~. n:.:;. 9 E\r~.:il·;,s.T ~.or, Com~tr~:.t-_:.se- ::i.s p:cs.:_::,s~1ted by ..L;n~ pj_j_ot Org~r.. iz:-.. -.·. .ior; IV. Limi t:a·:::i..c:".::: f::i::.· T:·-cr:.1.::;por r:: Ai:t-::::.a.f~ Op.:::::-·:;.-:-.~~::.·":; w:i rh 1.;.r:..> '.!V:"':L!."1 crew ~L: p~~0:etJ.t:::l ty ~~1E: Fligl1t E11ginc('=Y O:t;ar,j_zg.-,l..Jn v.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019
    Airbus A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019 Contents Scope and definitions 02 1.0 2020 & beyond 05 Accidents in 2019 07 2020 & beyond 08 Forecast increase in number of aircraft 2019-2038 09 2.0 Commercial aviation accidents since the advent of the jet age 10 Evolution of the number of flights & accidents 12 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 13 Impact of technology on aviation safety 14 Technology has improved aviation safety 16 Evolution of accident rates by aircraft generation 17 3.0 Commercial aviation accidents over the last 20 years 18 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 20 Ten year moving average of accident rate 21 Accidents by flight phase 22 Distribution of accidents by accident category 24 Evolution of the main accident categories 25 Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accident rates 26 Loss Of Control In-flight (LOC-I) accident rates 27 Runway Excursion (RE) accident rates 28 List of tables & graphs 29 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2019 02 Scope and definitions This publication provides Airbus’ a flight in a commercial aircraft annual analysis of aviation accidents, is a low risk activity. with commentary on the year 2019, Since the goal of any review of aviation as well as a review of the history of accidents is to help the industry Commercial Aviation’s safety record. further enhance safety, an analysis This analysis clearly demonstrates of forecasted aviation macro-trends that our industry has achieved huge is also provided. These highlight key improvements in safety over the factors influencing the industry’s last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Index Des Auteurs Auteur >> Numéro/Page
    Index des Auteurs http://www.aero-index.com/ Editions Larivière - Fanatique de l'Aviation Auteur >> Numéro/Page - Article Akary Frédéric ... Alex Trados -suite- 471/36 - Au sommet des cimes 130/63 - Le Fieseler 103 Reichenberg 143/70 - Messer 163 Anton (conversion) Alain Trados 131/63 - Le Me 163 (modifié en biplace) Allen Richard / Vincent Carl / Beauchamp Gérard 307/16 - Le Grumman / CCF G-23 Alegi Gregory 263/7 - Le Musée Caproni ouvrira au printemps Aloni Shlomo 267/6 - Un Macchi C.202 sort d'atelier 294/8 - Les Super Frelon israéliens au musée 278/6 - Le musée Caproni a réouvert ses portes 298/22 - Les deux guerres des Dassault Ouragan 360/7 - Un Bf 109 G-4 restauré en Italie 311/12 - Des Mystère contre des MiG 360/8 - Le Musée de la Force aérienne italienne rouvre... 312/61 - Des Mystère contre des MiG 363/11 - L'Arabie Saoudite offre un écrin à ses avions... 332/12 - Les Vautour en Israël 384/5 - L'Italie aura bientôt son Fiat CR.42 333/40 - Les Vautour en Israël 385/9 - Le SPAD VII du musée de la force aérienne... 334/50 - Les Vautour en Israël 391/7 - Le musée de la force aérienne italienne expose... 336/12 - De Sambad à Sa'ar 438/36 - Avant après 346/12 - L'épopée du Mirage III en Israël 446/7 - Rare trio de Ca.100 à Trente 347/50 - L'épopée du Mirage III en Israël 446/11 - Un premier Ro.37 afghan de retour en Italie 348/40 - L'épopée du Mirage III en Israël 452/10 - Le musée de la Force aérienne italienne expose..
    [Show full text]
  • Jerome S. Fanciulli Collection History of Aviation Collection
    Jerome S. Fanciulli Collection History of Aviation Collection Provenance Jerome S. Fanciulli was born in New York City, January 12, 1988. He was the son of Professor Francesco and Amanda Fanciulli. He was educated at de Witt Clinton High School in New York City. He attended St. Louis University, St. Louis, 1903-04 and Stevens Institute, Hoboken, N.J., 1904-05. He married Marian Callaghan in November, 1909. On January 12, 1986 he died in Winchester Hospital in Winchester, Virginia. Mr. Fanciulli worked for the Washington Post and then joined the Associated Press where his assignments were on the Capitol staff of the Associated Press. He became the AP’s aviation specialist. Mr. Fanciulli was a charter member of the National Press Club and a founding member of the Aero Club of Washington, D.C. In November 19098, Mr. Fanciulli joined Glenn H. Curtiss’ company. He was Vice President and General Manger of the Curtiss Exhibition Company. Among his many varied duties Mr. Fanciulli established schools of aviation and directed the demonstration and sale of Curtiss aeroplanes in the United States and Europe. He promoted or conducted some of the largest air meets in the United States prior to 1913. He collaborated with the United States Army and the United States Navy in developing aeroplane specifications. Mr. Fanciulli wrote magazine articles, employed and directed aviators obtaining contracts for them. Mr. Fanciulli sold the United States Navy its first biplane and the United States Army its second biplane. He also sold czarist Russia its first plane for their Navy. Mr. Fanciulli left the Glenn H.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM the GROUNDUP September 2004 CAPABILITIES BROCHURE
    Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. www.voughtaircraft.com INTEGRATED AEROSTRUCTURES FROM THE GROUNDUP September 2004 CAPABILITIES BROCHURE Airbus A330/A340 In 1988, we became the Boeing 747 We’ve built panels for the main first major U.S. structural assemblies supplier to fuselage, doors and the empennage section for more Airbus with the award of wing components for than 1,350 Boeing 747 aircraft since the program the A330/A340 long-range aircraft. Deliveries began in 1968. began in 1990, exceeding the 500 shipset mark in 2002. 2 PROVEN Lockheed Martin C-130J Hercules Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit Our company has delivered more than 2,200 We were one of three team members on the empennage sections to Lockheed Martin B-2 program, with responsibility for more since becoming a supplier on the C-130 structure than any other team member. program in the 1950s. Through our heritage companies, we have been a premier supplier to the aerospace industry for nearly nine decades. Vought is a proven leader in providing aerostructures of superior quality to our customers. We’ve helped shape many major aircraft programs over the years – from small business jets to jumbo airplanes, and tactical fighters to cargo aircraft. From the ground up, Vought creates quality structures that help our customers take flight. 3 Boeing C-17 Globemaster III Robotic Tack Cell Machine We have consistently driven down the price of the Our new robotic tack cell transforms a six-step C-17 components we build through continuous process into a single operation. The six-axis producibility improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairchild Aviation Corporation, Factory No. 1) MD-137 851 Pennsylvania Avenue Hagerstown Washington County Maryland
    KREIDER-REISNER AIRCRAFT COMPANY, FACTORY NO. 1 HAER MD-137 (Fairchild Aviation Corporation, Factory No. 1) MD-137 851 Pennsylvania Avenue Hagerstown Washington County Maryland PHOTOGRAPHS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 ADDENDUM TO: HAER MD-137 KREIDER-REISNER AIRCRAFT COMPANY, FACTORY NO. 1 MD-137 (Fairchild Aviation Corporation, Factory No. 1) 851 Pennsylvania Avenue Hagerstown Washington County Maryland WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD KREIDER-REISNER AIRCRAFT COMPANY, FACTORY NO. 1 (FAIRCHILD AVIATION CORPORATION, FACTORY NO. 1) HAER No. MD-137 LOCATION: 881 Pennsylvania Avenue (Originally 1 Park Lane), Hagerstown, Washington County, Maryland Fairchild Factory No. 1 is located at latitude: 39.654706, longitude: - 77.719042. The coordinate represents the main entrance of the factory, on the north wall at Park Lane. This coordinate was obtained on 22 August, 2007 by plotting its location on the 1:24000 Hagerstown, MD USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map. The accuracy of the coordinate is +/- 12 meters. The coordinate’s datum is North American Datum 1927. The Fairchild Factory No. 1 location has no restriction on its release to the public. DATES OF CONSTRUCTION: 1929, 1931, 1935, 1941, 1965, 1987 BUILDER: Kreider-Reisner Aircraft Company, a subsidiary of Fairchild Aviation Corporation PRESENT OWNER: Vincent Groh PRESENT USE: Light industry, storage SIGNIFICANCE: Kreider-Reisner Factory No. 1 (also known as Fairchild No. 1) was built as a result of a partnership between upstart airplane builders Ammon H.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Tire Data
    Aircraft tire Engineering Data Introduction Michelin manufactures a wide variety of sizes and types of tires to the exacting standards of the aircraft industry. The information included in this Data Book has been put together as an engineering and technical reference to support the users of Michelin tires. The data is, to the best of our knowledge, accurate and complete at the time of publication. To be as useful a reference tool as possible, we have chosen to include data on as many industry tire sizes as possible. Particular sizes may not be currently available from Michelin. It is advised that all critical data be verified with your Michelin representative prior to making final tire selections. The data contained herein should be used in conjunction with the various standards ; T&RA1, ETRTO2, MIL-PRF- 50413, AIR 8505 - A4 or with the airframer specifications or military design drawings. For those instances where a contradiction exists between T&RA and ETRTO, the T&RA standard has been referenced. In some cases, a tire is used for both civil and military applications. In most cases they follow the same standard. Where they do not, data for both tires are listed and identified. The aircraft application information provided in the tables is based on the most current information supplied by airframe manufacturers and/or contained in published documents. It is intended for use as general reference only. Your requirements may vary depending on the actual configuration of your aircraft. Accordingly, inquiries regarding specific models of aircraft should be directed to the applicable airframe manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • Rudy Arnold Photo Collection
    Rudy Arnold Photo Collection Kristine L. Kaske; revised 2008 by Melissa A. N. Keiser 2003 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series 1: Black and White Negatives....................................................................... 4 Series 2: Color Transparencies.............................................................................. 62 Series 3: Glass Plate Negatives............................................................................ 84 Series : Medium-Format Black-and-White and Color Film, circa 1950-1965.......... 93
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the Centennial of Naval Aviation in 1/72 Scale
    Celebrating the Centennial of Naval Aviation in 1/72 Scale 2010 USN/USMC/USCG 1/72 Aircraft Kit Survey J. Michael McMurtrey IPMS-USA 1746 Carrollton, TX [email protected] As 2011 marks the centennial of U.S. naval aviation, aircraft modelers might be interested in this list of US naval aircraft — including those of the Marines and Coast Guard, as well as captured enemy aircraft tested by the US Navy — which are available as 1/72 scale kits. Why 1/72? There are far more kits of naval aircraft available in this scale than any other. Plus, it’s my favorite, in spite of advancing age and weakening eyes. This is an updated version of an article I prepared for the 75th Anniversary of US naval aviation and which was published in a 1986 issue of the old IPMS-USA Update. It’s amazing to compare the two and realize what developments have occurred, both in naval aeronautical technology and the scale modeling hobby, but especially the latter. My 1986 list included 168 specific aircraft types available in kit form from thirty- three manufacturers — some injected, some vacuum-formed — and only three conversion kits and no resin kits. Many of these names (Classic Plane, Contrails, Eagle’s Talon, Esci, Ertl, Formaplane, Frog, Griffin, Hawk, Matchbox, Monogram, Rareplane, Veeday, Victor 66) are no longer with us or have been absorbed by others. This update lists 345 aircraft types (including the original 168) from 192 different companies (including the original 33), many of which, especially the producers of resin kits, were not in existence in 1986, and some of which were unknown to me at the time.
    [Show full text]