T.C. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Maliye Anabilim Dali

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

T.C. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Maliye Anabilim Dali T.C. SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ MALİYE ANABİLİM DALI ALTYAPI HİZMETLERİNDE KAMU-ÖZEL SEKTÖR ORTAKLIĞI: AB ÜLKELERİYLE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR İNCELEME Serap GÜL KIR 1340214503 DOKTORA TEZİ DANIŞMAN Prof. Dr. Levent KÖSEKAHYAOĞLU ISPARTA-2020 (GÜL KIR, Serap, Altyapı Hizmetlerinde Kamu-Özel Sektör Ortaklığı: AB Ülkeleriyle Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme, Doktora Tezi, Isparta, 2020) ÖZET Türkiye’nin de içinde yer aldığı gelişmekte olan ülkelerde altyapı yatırım gereksinimlerinin mevcut kamu kaynaklarını aşması; özel sektörün, kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı yoluyla altyapının finansmanında daha büyük bir rol oynamasını gerektirmektedir ki bu bağlamda, pek çok gelişmekte olan ülke altyapı hizmetlerinin sunumunda kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı uygulamasını başlatmıştır. Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinde ise kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı özellikle kamu kaynaklarının projeleri istenilen kalitede ve düzeyde uygulamakta yetersiz kaldığı durumlarda alternatif bir finansman modeli olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışma, kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı modeliyle altyapıya en fazla yatırım yapan ülkelerden biri konumunda olan Türkiye ile beş AB ülkesindeki altyapı hizmetlerine yönelik kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı yatırımlarının mevcut durumunu tespit etmeyi; varsa alternatif yol ve yöntemler ile meydana gelen sorunları ortaya koymayı; uygulanan sistemin sürdürülebilirliği için yapılması gerekenleri belirlemeyi ve sistemin problemli taraflarına yönelik alternatifler önermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, çalışmanın ilk aşamasında altyapı hizmetleri ve kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı kapsamlı bir şekilde ele alınarak açıklanmış, ikinci aşamada seçilen AB ülkelerindeki altyapı hizmetlerine yönelik kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı yatırımlarının mevcut durumu üçüncü aşamada ise Türkiye’deki altyapı hizmetlerine yönelik kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı yatırımlarının mevcut durumu ortaya konulmuştur. Çalışmanın ampirik kısmını teşkil eden son aşamada ise altyapı hizmetlerine yönelik kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı yatırımları ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki beş AB üyesi ülke ile Türkiye özelinde karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışmada beş AB üyesi ülke ile Türkiye için 1990-2018 yılları arası yıllık veriler kullanılmıştır. Modele yıllık ekonomik büyüme oranları, belirlenen dönemde gerçekleştirilen projelerin sayısı ve değerleri dâhil edilmiştir. Ampirik sonuçlara göre, kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı yatırımlarının ekonomik büyüme oranı üzerindeki etkisinin istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Altyapı Hizmetleri, Kamu-Özel Sektör Ortaklığı, Panel Veri Analizi iii (GÜL KIR, Serap, Public Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Sevices: A Comparative Review with EU Countries, Ph.D. Thesis, Isparta, 2020) ABSTRACT That the need of infrastructure investments has exceeded current public resources in developing countries where Turkey is also included requires that private sector plays a bigger role in financing infrastructure through public-private partnerships. In this context, many developing countries have started a public-private partnership practice in the provision of infrastructure services. In the European Union countries, public-private partnerships have emerged as an alternative financing model, especially in cases where public resources fail to implement projects at the desired quality and level. This study aims at investigating current situation of public-private partnership towards infrastructure services in Turkey, one of the most invested countries in infrastructure through public-private partnership and five EU countries; putting forth the problems (if any) emerged because of alternative ways and methods; determining what needs to be done for the sustainability of the system implemented; developing recommendations for problematic sides of the system. In this regard, infrastructure services and public-private partnership are discussed and explained comprehensively in the first phase of the study. It was put forth the current status of public-private partnership investments for infrastructure services in EU countries in the second phase, and in the third phase the current state of public-private partnerships for infrastructure investments in Turkey. In the final phase which is the empirical part of the study, the relationship between investments for infrastructure services by public-private partnership and economic growth were compared in the five EU countries and in Turkey using the annual data for the period of 1990-2018 for the countries. Annual economic growth rates, the number and values of the projects realised in that period. According to empirical results, there is no significant effect of public-private partnership investments on economic growth rate. Keywords: Infrastructure Services, Public-Private Partnerships, Panel Data Analysis iv İÇİNDEKİLER TEZ SAVUNMA SINAV TUTANAĞI ......................................................................... İ YEMİN METNİ ............................................................................................................. İİ ÖZET............................................................................................................................. İİİ ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................İV İÇİNDEKİLER .............................................................................................................. V KISALTMALAR DİZİNİ ............................................................................................İX ŞEKİLLER DİZİNİ ......................................................................................................Xİ TABLOLAR DİZİNİ .................................................................................................. Xİİ GRAFİKLER DİZİNİ ............................................................................................... XİV ÖNSÖZ ......................................................................................................................... XV GİRİŞ ............................................................................................................................... 1 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM ALTYAPI HİZMETLERİNDE KAMU-ÖZEL SEKTÖR ORTAKLIĞI TEORİSİ 1.1. ALTYAPI HİZMETLERİNİN TANIMI VE NİTELİĞİ ................................. 4 1.1.1. Altyapı Hizmetlerinin Tanımı .......................................................................... 4 1.1.2. Altyapı Hizmetlerinin Temel Özellikleri ......................................................... 6 1.1.3. Altyapı Hizmetlerinde Reform Uygulamaları ............................................... 11 1.1.3.1. Kamu Sektörü Sunumu ve Finansmanında Gerçekleştirilen Reformlar . 12 1.1.3.1.1. Şirketleştirme (Ticarileştirme) .......................................................... 12 1.1.3.1.2. Performans Sözleşmeleri .................................................................. 14 1.1.3.1.3. Desantralizasyon (Yerelleşme-Yerelleştirme-Yerinden Yönetim) .. 15 1.1.3.2. Altyapı Hizmetlerinin Sunumu ve Finansmanında Piyasaya Dayalı Reformlar ................................................................................................ 16 1.1.3.2.1. Demonopolizasyon ve Piyasaların Yeniden Yapılandırılması ......... 17 1.1.3.2.2. Piyasaların Rekabete Açılması ......................................................... 18 1.1.3.2.3. Piyasaların Yeniden Düzenlenmesi (Re-regülasyon) ....................... 19 1.2. KAMU-ÖZEL SEKTÖR ORTAKLIĞININ TANIMI VE NİTELİĞİ ......... 20 1.2.1. Kamu-Özel Sektör Ortaklığının Tanımı ........................................................ 20 1.2.2. Altyapı Hizmetlerine Özel Sektör Katılımı Modelleri .................................. 22 1.2.2.1. İhale Yöntemi .......................................................................................... 23 1.2.2.2. Yönetim Sözleşmesi ................................................................................ 23 1.2.2.3. Kiralama Sözleşmesi ............................................................................... 24 1.2.2.4. Yap-İşlet-Devret (YİD) ve Türleri .......................................................... 26 1.2.2.5. İmtiyaz Sözleşmesi .................................................................................. 28 1.2.2.6. Tasfiye ve Satış ....................................................................................... 30 1.2.3. Kamu-Özel Sektör Ortaklığının Gerekçeleri ................................................. 31 1.2.4. Kamu-Özel Sektör Ortaklığının Olumlu Yönleri .......................................... 35 1.2.5. Kamu-Özel Sektör Ortaklığının Olumsuz Yönleri ........................................ 45 1.3. KAMU-ÖZEL SEKTÖR ORTAKLIĞI EKONOMİSİ .................................. 49 1.3.1. Kamu-Özel Sektör Ortaklığında Karar Verme Süreci ................................... 50 1.3.2. Kamu-Özel Sektör Ortaklığı Projelerinde Yaşam Döngüsü .......................... 51 1.3.3. Kamu-Özel Sektör Ortaklığı Projelerinde Risk ve Risk Paylaşımı ............... 52 v 1.3.3.1. Risk ve Belirsizlik ................................................................................... 52 1.3.3.2. Riskin Sınıflandırılması .......................................................................... 53 1.3.3.3. Uluslararası Standartlarda Risk ............................................................... 55 1.3.3.4. Risk Değerlendirmesi .............................................................................. 55 1.3.3.5. Risk Tedavisi ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Tesis Ve İşletme Satış / Devri
    Tesis ve İşletme Satış / Devri: SATIŞ/DEVİR SATIŞ/DEVİR Satış/Devir BEDELİ BEDELİ Tesis/İşletmeler ve Ait Olduğu Kuruluşlar Bulunduğu İl Özelleştirme Yöntemi Tarihi (TL) (ABD Doları) Satın Alan / Devralan SEK - Kars Süt ve Mamulleri Müessesesi Kars Kiralama 24.03.1986 0 0 PEYSAN Gıda Sanayi A.Ş. SEK - K. Maraş Süt ve Mamulleri İşletmesi Kahramanmaraş Varlık Satışı 9.10.1989 1.600 708.755 Yaşar Dondurma ve Gıda Maddeleri Ltd. Şti. SEK - Tire Süt Toplama Merkezi İzmir Varlık Satışı 10.05.1993 505 51.750 Levent YATKIN SEK - Çatalca Süt Toplama Merkezi İstanbul Varlık Satışı 13.05.1993 675 67.912 Zaim YÜCEL-Hacı Ali HASBAYRAM YEM Sanayii - Çaycuma Yem Fabrikası Zonguldak Varlık Satışı 23.07.1993 12.772 1.133.088 Yurtbay Yem Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. Şti. YEM Sanayii - Adıyaman Yem Fabrikası Adıyaman Varlık Satışı 1.11.1993 6.200 478.136 Güçlü Yem Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. YEM Sanayii - Korkuteli Yem Fabrikası Antalya Varlık Satışı 2.11.1993 12.000 919.762 Korkutelim Yem Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. YEM Sanayii - Samsun Yem Fabrikası Samsun Varlık Satışı 2.11.1993 42.000 3.219.168 Samsun Yem Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. YEM Sanayii - Acıpayam Yem Fabrikası Denizli Varlık Satışı 3.11.1993 10.500 801.847 Acıpayam Yem Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. YEM Sanayii - Bursa Yem Fabrikası Bursa Varlık Satışı 3.11.1993 27.000 2.061.893 Vaner Gıda Ticaret ve Sanayi Ltd. Şti. YEM Sanayii - Çankırı Yem Fabrikası Çankırı Varlık Satışı 3.11.1993 11.500 878.214 Çan-Yem Çankırı Yem Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Watch Monday, March 01, 2021 Agenda
    Market Watch Monday, March 01, 2021 www.sekeryatirim.com.tr Agenda 01 M onday 02 Tuesday 03 Wednesday 04 Thursday 05 Friday Turkstat, 4Q20 GDP Growth Germany, January TurkStat, February inflation CBRT, February Germany, Janu- retail sales inflation assess- ary factory orders China, February Caixin non-mfg. China, February Caixin mfg. PMI ment Germany, February PMI U.S., February Germany and Eurozone, Febru- unemployment data U.S., jobless non-farm payrolls ary Markit mfg. PMI Germany and Eurozone, Febru- ary Markit non-mfg. PMI claims and unemploy- Eurozone, February ment rate Germany, February CPI CPI Eurozone, February PPI U.S., January factory orders U.S., February U.S., February Markit mfg. PMI U.S., February ADP employment average hourly change earnings U.S., February ISM manufactur- ing index U.S., February Markit non-mfg. PMI U.S., January construction U.S., February ISM non- spending manufacturing index Outlook Major global stock markets closed lower on Friday, amid the rise in US Treasury yields, which has increased concerns over rising inflation and the Fed derailing its currently accommodative policy. Global risk appetite has Volume (mn TRY) BIST 100 relatively weakened, despite Fed Chair Powell’s statements suggesting that inflation was likely to remain below the targeted value, and that the 1.551 major central bank would maintain its current policy. Having moved in 1.518 1.488 parallel to the course of major international stock markets, the BIST100 48.000 1.483 1.471 1.600 also shed 1.13% to close at 1,471.39 on Friday, after a volatile day in 40.000 1.500 trading.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Watch Tuesday, August 08, 2017 Agenda
    Market Watch Tuesday, August 08, 2017 www.sekeryatirim.com.tr Agenda 07 Monday 08 Tuesday 09 Wednesday 10 Thursday 11 Friday Germany, June industrial TurkStat, June industrial U.S., June wholesale U.S., jobless claims CBRT, June balance of production production inventories U.S., July PPI payments U.S., July CPI Outlook: Major stock markets have advanced to new highs, and the BIST100 has Volume (mn TRY) BIST 100 also tested new record-highs, closing up 1.1% at 109,781 on Monday. Total trading volume in the market was at TRY 6.6bn. Today, market participants 109.781 will follow TurkStat’s June industrial production release; there are no other 10.000 110.000 108.545 major data announcements. Asian markets have seen mixed trading this 8.000 morning, and the European stock markets are expected to open slightly 107.154 108.000 106.525 down. We expect the BIST to maintain its uptrend in parallel to rising global 6.000 106.147 risk appetite, although we caution that the likelihood of profit taking rises 106.000 after swift upsurges. We expect the BIST to open positively today, refresh- 4.000 4.912 4.958 ing its new record highs. RESISTANCE: 110,000 /111,200 SUP- 5.418 104.000 4.667 2.000 4.667 PORT: 109,100/108,600. 0 102.000 1-Aug 2-Aug 3-Aug 4-Aug 7-Aug Money Market: The Lira was positive yesterday, gaining 0.14% against the USD to close at 3.5295. Additionally, the currency depreciated by 0.07% against the basket composed of $0.50 and €0.50.
    [Show full text]
  • Premailer Middle East 2021
    Bonds, Loans Shangri-La Bosphorus, Istanbul & Sukuk Turkey 2021 Turkey’s largest capital markets event www.bondsloansturkey.com 93% 50+ 20% 250+ DIRECTOR LEVEL OR ABOVE REGIONAL & INTERNATIONAL SOVEREIGN, CORPORATE & INDUSTRY EXPERT SPEAKERS BANKS ATTENDED FI BORROWERS Bonds, Loans & Sukuk Turkey has become the meeting point of all important players in finance through the correct mix of its participants, and its reliability with continuity of successful organisations in the last consecutive years Selahattin BİLGEN, IGA Airport PLATINUM SPONSOR GOLD SPONSOR BRONZE SPONSORS WELCOME TO THE ANNUAL MEETING PLACE FOR TURKEY’S FINANCE PROFESSIONALS Bonds, Loans & Sukuk Turkey is the country’s largest capital markets event. It is the only event to combine discussions across the Bond, Loans and Sukuk markets, making it a “must attend” event for the country’s leading CEOs, CFOs and Treasurers. With over 65% of the audience representing issuers and borrowers and over 93% being director level or above, it is the place where live deals are discussed and mandates are won each year. As a speaker, I had a dynamic discussion which was a great experience. Overall, the organisation was great and attracted an invaluable list of attendees. Orhan Kaya, ICBC Turkey SAVE YOURSELF SHOWCASE YOUR INCREASE TIME AND MONEY EXPERTISE IN THE REGION AWARENESS get the attendee list 2 weeks by presenting a case study by taking an exhibition space before the event so you can to a room full of potential and demonstrating your pre-arrange meetings. clients. products and services. WIN MORE INCREASE YOUR BUSINESS BRANDS PRESENCE packages include a number through the numerous of staff passes so you can branding opportunities cover more clients.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of External Actors in the Western Balkans
    The influence of external actors in the Western Balkans A map of geopolitical players www.kas.de Impressum Contact: Florian C. Feyerabend Desk Officer for Southeast Europe/Western Balkans European and International Cooperation Europe/North America team Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Phone: +49 30 26996-3539 E-mail: [email protected] Published by: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e. V. 2018, Sankt Augustin/Berlin Maps: kartoxjm, fotolia Design: yellow too, Pasiek Horntrich GbR Typesetting: Janine Höhle, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Diese Publikation ist/DThe text of this publication is published under a Creative Commons license: “Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 international” (CC BY-SA 4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-sa/4.0/legalcode. ISBN 978-3-95721-471-3 Contents Introduction: The role of external actors in the Western Balkans 4 Albania 9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 14 Kosovo 17 Croatia 21 Macedonia 25 Romania 29 Serbia and Montenegro 32 The geopolitical context 39 3 Introduction: The role of external actors in the Western Balkans by Dr Lars Hänsel and Florian C. Feyerabend Dear readers, A spectre haunts the Western Balkans – the spec- consists of reports from our representatives in the tre of geopolitics. Once again, the region is at risk various countries involved. Along with the non-EU of becoming a geostrategic chessboard for exter- countries in the Western Balkans, this study also nal actors. Warnings are increasingly being voiced considers the situation in Croatia and Romania. in Brussels and other Western capitals, as well as in the region itself. Russia, China, Turkey and the One thing is clear: the integration of the Western Gulf States are ramping up their political, eco- Balkans into Euro-Atlantic and European struc- nomic and cultural influence in this enclave within tures is already well advanced, with close ties and the European Union – with a variety of resources, interdependencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Equity Strategy
    Equity Strategy June 05, 2012 Monthly Equity Strategy Selling pressure rose in May… Research Team HOLD +90 (212) 334 33 33 [email protected] Following the strong first quarter fuelled by increased risk appetite in developed markets, sentiment has Facts & Figures Close MoM again turned negative over the past two months. The ISE - 100, TRY 55,099 -8.18 mood in the market went south in April on news from ISE - 100, USD 29,939 -12.75 the U.S., while sales accelerated in May on increased Total Volume, TRY mn 43,471 -69.14 uncertainty following the elections in France and Greece. In addition to this, the inability to establish a MSCI EM Turkey 413,199 -13.0% government in Athens, and the emergent likelihood of MSCI EM 906 -11.7% its exit from the euro increased selling pressure in the Benchmark Bond 9.45% -13 bps stock market in May. The ISE-100 index, remaining relatively strong compared to international peers in USD/TL 1.8404 5.23% April, was also buffeted by international sell-off winds EUR/TL 2.2840 -1.26% in the last month. The ISE-100 index, which started the P/E Current month of May at 60,000 levels, has, aside from negative developments in foreign markets, been affected by ISE - 100 10.2 S&P’s downgrading of the country outlook from positive Banking 7.9 to ‘stable’, and Fitch’s statement that the period Industrial 13.2 leading to Turkey’s uptick to investment grade would Steel 8.4 be longer than expected, and retreated to 54,000 levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Largest Capital Markets Event
    Book your place before 5th September to SAVE £200 enter code DM1 at www.BondsLoansTurkey.com Turkey’s largest capital markets event Platinum Sponsors Gold Sponsors Lunch Sponsor Silver Sponsor Bronze Sponsors WELCOME TO Bonds, Loans & Sukuk Turkey 2018 REASONS TO ATTEND 1 Hear global investors’ analysis of the opportunities in the market from: BlueBay, Barings, Manulife 2 Gain an economist’s assessment of Turkey’s macroeconomic fundamentals: Find out which external factors are likely to impact Turkey over the next 2 years 520+ 3 Discover how issuers are hedging against FX volatility, attendees and what companies are doing with existing hard 95% currency debt Director level 4 Uncover which markets offer borrowers and issuers or above the best options, hear from: Medical Park, Vakıf Emeklilik, Bank ABC, HSBC and Emirates NBD 5 Network with 520+ senior stakeholders from the Turkish Capital Markets: 95% are Director level or above 63% Corporate & Bonds, Loans & Sukuk Turkey is a fantastic event where I can see many financial institutions and colleagues from all over the world. It also FI Issuers and provides a useful market update, covering the latest developments in the Borrowers, Turkish Capital Markets. 70+ Muzaffer Aksoy, Bank ABC Investors and speakers 2 Government Senior Level Speakers include Semih Ergür, Naz Masraff, Timothy Ash, Murat Ucer, Chief Executive Officer, Director of Europe, Senior EM Sovereign Strategist, Economist, IC Holding Eurasia Group BlueBay Asset Management GlobalSource Partners Burcu Ozturk, Burcu Geris Richard
    [Show full text]
  • Soe Focus 5 2020 Turkey.Pdf
    SOUTHEASTEUROPE in Focus No. 5/2020 External Actors Series: Turkey With contributions by Dimitar Bechev Srecko Latal Hamdi Fırat Büyük Dino Mujadžević Birgül Demirtaş Sabina Pacariz Ahmet Erdi Öztürk Beken Saatçioğlu Mariya Hake Edited by Christian Hagemann © Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft, August 2020 Widenmayerstr. 49 80538 München Email: [email protected] URL: www.sogde.org All rights reserved Southeast Europe in Focus 5/ 2020 Editor: Christian Hagemann, Deputy Director of the Southeast Europe Association, Munich Published by Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft e.V. / Southeast Europe Association, August 2020, Munich. This publication is written within the framework of the project “Reality Check Series: Sources, Tools and Impact of External Non-EU-Engagement in Southeast Europe” led by the Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft (SOG) with the support of the German Federal Foreign Office (Stability Pact for Southeast Europe sponsored by Germany). About the project Recently, the Western Balkans region and the whole of Southeast Europe have developed into a showcase of great power interests. In particular, Russia, Turkey, and China are coming to the fore as increasingly committed external actors (in addition to the European Union and the USA). Nevertheless, there are differences in the motivations and goals of the actors concerned. The project of the Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft / Southeast Europe Association took a closer look at the motives, instruments, and effects of the influence of Russia, Turkey, and China. The project examined the geostrategically, security policy,
    [Show full text]
  • Türkiye'nin Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesinden
    İstanbul Üniversitesi Istanbul University Su Ürünleri Dergisi Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences (2015) 30(2): 1-13 (2015) 30(2): 1-13 doi: 10.18864/iujfas.00850 doi: 10.18864/iujfas.00850 TÜRKİYE’NİN DOĞU AKDENİZ BÖLGESİNDEN YAKALANAN LEVREK (Dicentrarchus labrax L.,1758) VE YAYIN (Silurus glanis L.,1758) BALIKLARINDA KALICI ORGANİK KİRLETİCİLERİN BELİRLENMESİ Serdar KİLERCİOĞLU1*, Nebile DAĞLIOĞLU2, Bige Gülmen KİLERCİOĞLU1 1 Çukurova Üniversitesi, Su Ürünleri Fakültesi, Adana, Türkiye 2 Çukurova Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Adana, Türkiye *E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Determination of POP’s In European Sea Bass (Dicen- trarchus labrax, L.,1758) and Wels Catfish (Silurus glanis, L.,1758) Caught From The Eastern Mediterra- ÖZ nean Region of Turkey Bu çalışmada Türkiye’nin Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesi’nden yakalanan The aim of this study was to determine some persistent organic pol- Levrek (Dicentrarchus labrax, L.,1758) ve Yayın (Silurus glanis, lutants (HCB (hexachlorobenzen), HCH (Hexachlorosiklohexane), L.,1758) balıklarının yenilebilir kas dokularında bazı kalıcı organik DDT (dichloro diphenol trichloroethane)) and PCBs (Polychlorinat- kirleticiler (DDT (dikloro difenol trikloroethan), HCB (hekzakloro- edbiphenyls) in the edible muscle tissues of Seabass (Dicentrarchus benzen), BHC (hekzaklorosiklohekzan) ile poliklorlu bifeniller labrax, L.,1758) and Wels (Silurus glanis, L.,1758). Seabass samples (PCB)’in birikim düzeylerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Levrek were caught from Mersin Port, Karataş and Yumurtalık (Adana), örnekleri Mersin limanı, Adana (Karataş ve Yumurtalık) ve İskende- İskenderun, Dörtyol, Arsuz, Samandağ (İskenderun Bay); Well sam- run Körfezi (İskenderun, Dörtyol, Arsuz ve Samandağ)’nden; Yayın ples were caught from Seyhan and Ceyhan Rivers (Adana), Asi River örnekleri Seyhan ve Ceyhan Nehirleri (Adana), Asi Nehri (Hatay), (Hatay), Berdan Stream (Tarsus).
    [Show full text]
  • TAV Airports Holding
    Company Update Aviation Industry May 21, 2021 TAV Airports Holding Almaty International Airport becomes TAV Airport’s first owned airport R. Fulin Önder Equity Research Analyst [email protected] MARKET PERFORM The consortium formed by TAV Airports and VPE Capital has finalized TP: TRY 26.30 the share transfer of Almaty Airport as of end-April 2021. Almaty Airport is now owned by the consortium, of which TAV Airports is an 85% Previous TP: 23.00 shareholder. The Kazakhstan Infrastructure Fund under the Upside potential: 11% management of VPE Capital holds the remaining 15% stake. The purchase price has been revised down to US$365mn at the closing of the deal, from US$415mn previously, with an earn-out schedule for the remaining US$50mn - TAV Airports and VPE Capital had previously agreed to acquire 100% shares of Almaty Airport and its associated jet fuel and catering businesses for an EV of US$415mn on May 7, 2020. The previously agreed purchase price was revised down to TRY US$ US$365mn at the closing of the deal, taking into account the traffic Close 23.60 2.82 decrease at the airport due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The parties have rather inked an “earn-out” schedule (Fig. 1) for the payment of the BIST 100 1,450 173 remaining US$50mn of the previously agreed on price. The payments to US$/TRY(CB Bid Rate): 8.3689 be made according to this “earn-out” schedule will be subject to traffic recovery at Almaty Airport reaching certain thresholds. The ultimate 52 Week High: 26.74 3.66 threshold number is set as 28,883 flights, determined according to the 52 Week Low : 13.79 1.66 average of total of international and cargo ATMs during 2018 & 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Editors' Preface
    Editors’ Preface When the three of us first approached colleagues with view to convening a Festschrift for Nicholas Postgate, the response was overwhelming. Messages poured in enthusing over Nicho- las’ intellectual and human qualities in the warmest terms, and it is no surprise that the final product has needed two volumes to fit everybody in (and that’s after we limited the project to contributors who had worked directly with the jubilar!). It has always been a feature of Nicholas’ scholarship and teaching that, unlike most Meso- potamianists, he is equally comfortable with Archaeology and Philology, and indeed sees the two as indissoluble parts of the same intellectual enterprise. We have therefore arranged the contributions alphabetically, to allow the most unexpected combinations of topics to appear side by side, as is characteristic of Nicholas’ own publication list (see pp. xiiiff.). Nicholas is the most modest and unassuming of scholars, and he probably shudders at the idea of both a Festschrift, and, even more, a preface to it. Yet, not least owing to our indebted- ness to him as Doktorkinder, we cannot resist the urge to pen a few words on him and his career. It is a story with many exciting moments, and we hope Nicholas will indulge us in presenting it before readers to whom it is new. Nicholas first arrived in Cambridge in 1963, to read Classics, having previously attended his father’s preparatory school and Winchester College. In truth, harbingers of his future in- terests were not entirely absent: as a member of the Winchester Archaeological Society, he had invited Oliver Gurney to address the school on The Hittites (disappointingly receiving instead a lecture on the decipherment of cuneiform).
    [Show full text]
  • Arkeoloji Ve Etnografya Dergisi
    Yıl: 2005 Sayı: 5 TÜRK ARKEOLOJİ VE ETNOGRAFYA DERGİSİ T.C. KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM BAKANLIĞI KÜLTÜR VARLIKLARI VE MÜZELER GENEL MÜPÜRLÜGÜ TURK ARKEOLOJİ VE ETNOGRAFYA DERGİSİ YIL: 2005 SAYI: 5 T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü tarafından yılda bir yayınlanır. T.C. KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM BAKANLIĞI Ana Yayın No: 3037 Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları Yayın No: 111 YAYIN KURULU Prof. Dr. Ay gül SÜ E L Prof. Dr. Bozkurt ERSOY Prof. Dr. Binnur G ÜRLER Prof. Dr. Ebru PARMAN Prof. Dr. Gürbüz ERGİNER Prof. Dr. Metin Ö ZBEK Prof. Dr. Mustafa Hamdi SAYAR Prof. Dr. Oğuz TEK İN Doç. Dr. Gül A SA TEK İN Doç. Dr. Hande K Ö K T EN Doç. Dr. Harun TA ŞKIRA N Doç. Dr. Mine KAD İRO ĞLU Doç. Dr. Tunç SİPAHİ Yrd. Doç. Dr. Bekir ESKİCİ YAYINA HAZIRLAYANLAR Koray OLŞEN Dr. Fahriye BAYRAM Dr. Adil ÖZM E Nurhan ÜLGEN KAPAK TASARIMI Koray OLŞEN UYGULAMA Suna G Ü LER ISSN:1302-9231 ISBN: 975-17-3165-8 Kapak Fotoğrafı: Savaş Yıldırım (Diyabakır Melek Ahmet Paşa camii çinileri) * Dergide yayınlanan yazıların sorumluluğu yazarlarına aittir. Yayınlanan yazılarda dil, anlatım ve yayın tekniği yönünden değişiklik yapılabilir. T.C. KÜLTÜR ve TURİZM BAKANLIĞI ' DÖSİMM BASIMEVİ ANKARA 2005 E5Kİ ÇAĞDAN GÜNÜMÜZE ÖLÜ GÖMME ve ANMA GELENEKLERİ A. Tuba ÖKSE* Eski Önasya’da ölü ruhlarının “Ölüler Ülkesi”nde mülmesi gibi uygulamalar sürmüştür. Anadolu’nun yaşamaya devam ettiği İnancı çerçevesinde mezar­ bazı bölgelerinde ölüler nadiren yatağı ve yorganı İle lara yiyecek ve içecek bırakılmış, tütsü yakılmış ve birlikte gömülmektedir13. Hıristiyan dünyasında ölü ölenlerin adları belirli dinî törenlerde anılmıştır'.
    [Show full text]