DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rise and Fall of the Kingdom of Talossa 1979-2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rise and Fall of the Kingdom of Talossa 1979-2005 Ár Päts The Rise and Fall of the Kingdom of Talossa 1979-2005 É É É R. BEN MADISON, M.A. É É É Published by Preßeu Støtanneu Abbavilla, Atatürk, RT Ár Päts, 2005 Edition Copyright © 1997-2005 by R. Ben Madison É É É All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, quoted or paraphrased, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, internet, or any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the author. “Talossa” is a registered trademark and any unauthorized use of the word is a violation of US and international law. This edition created with WordPerfect 10 and Adobe Acrobat 5.0. © 2004 Ben Madison, 1, http://www.talossa-rt.com PREFACE: What was Talossa? Ár Päts means “Our Country.” And in 2005, our country – the Kingdom of Talossa – died. But Talossa was an amazing ride for 25 years. Talossa was a micronation, a self-proclaimed “sovereign, independent state” located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin from 1979 till its collapse in 2005. It all started when I was fourteen years old, a high school sophomore learning German and dreaming of worlds beyond my boring home in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The day after Christmas in 1979, I declared my bedroom to be its own “independent country,” the Kingdom of Talossa. This gave me the opportunity to draw maps and flags, and even to design my own Talossan language. Instead of dying out right away the way it should have, the political adventure called Talossa grew from a one-man high school lark to a worldwide community involving members from the US, Canada, Italy, France, Switzerland, Australia, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere. It grew from being my personal obsession in Milwaukee to being the corporate obsession of dozens of people, mostly on the internet. During its 25 year run, nearly 150 people became involved with Talossa: some for years, some as flashes in the pan. Almost all of them left something behind as part of this bizarre story. But, as they say, all good things must come to an end. In 2003, Talossa began to fall apart when the country’s ruling party decided that Talossa was “their” country and that anyone who disagreed with them, including the country’s founders, and the majority of the population, was unpatriotic. What had begun as a schoolboy’s dream, an excuse to design a flag and a language and write national anthems, descended into vitriol and hatred; the next year, the owners of Talossa’s websites kicked the rest of the population out of “their” country and, in violation of the group’s trademark, invented their own separate “Talossa” on the internet. The remaining Talossans, desperate to rebuild their population, turned immigration over to a failed businessman from Wisconsin, who proceeded to pack Talossa full of his own friends and family in order to oust the country’s original population and grab the brass ring himself. In the angry fallout that followed, nearly all the original Talossans washed their hands. 25 years was enough. The website was taken down, the people left. After 25 years, Talossa died. There are now at least three groups out there, somewhere on the internet, each calling itself “Talossa.” As an ex-Talossan, I belong to none of them. But as the founder of Talossa and a part of this amazing adventure for more than half my life, as well as its only active historian, the inventor of the Talossan language, and designer of virtually all Talossa’s imagery, topology, iconography and identity, I still feel connected at least to the history of the old place. And I feel compelled to tell what really happened. Marc Moisan, a Talossan supreme court justice from Nova Scotia, as he announced his withdrawal from the dying state in 2005, wrote these words: “I have been privileged to count myself as a citizen of a micronation that will most © 2004 Ben Madison, 2, http://www.talossa-rt.com certainly remain a part of world history.” Talossa seems to be all about history. It was a place where people could get involved and leave their mark. Its website once touted Talossa as “a country small enough for your voice to be heard, yet large enough for that voice to make a real difference.” But it failed to live up to its dream. Looking back on all the work I’ve put into Talossa these past 25 years, telling the story is almost as much fun as living it. In spite of how it ended, I hope you enjoy the ride as much as I have! R. Ben Madison, 26 December 2005 GLOSSARY: One feature of this book that might annoy the reader is its frequent use of abbreviations and “Talossan lingo.” But, this is how Talossans write, speak, and think. So, I am adding this glossary, which I hope will clarify the story told in these pages. 3WP: Third Wave Party. Short-lived 1996 party. France; one of seven. 59: See “Fifty-nine.” Clark: Monthly bulletin of proposed laws, published Abbavilla: Talossa’s capital, on the UWM campus. by the SoS. Amish: Derogatory term for non-online Talossans. CLP: Conservative Loyalist Party (2005). Androids: Right-wing teenagers Andrew Wozniak CNV: Council for Nationalist Victory. and “Davron.” Constituziun: The 1988 constitution. Anniversary Party: Occasional winter party to Contrâ: A “no” vote on a bill in the Ziu. celebrate the Anniversary. COP: Clockwork Orange Party, founded in 1995. Anniversary: 26 December, the nation’s birthday Cort: The “Uppermost Cort” is Talossa’s supreme (1979). court. It has three Justices. Ár Päts: This book. Cosâ: Lower house of the Ziu, it has 200 seats. See Atatürk: Talossa’s northern province, one of seven. “Real Cosâ.” BA Beach: “Bare Ass” Beach, the Talossan Sea shore Covenants of Rights and Freedoms: Sort of a of Atatürk Province. Talossan “Bill of Rights.” Ben Wu: 1981 name for Støtanneu. CÚG: Committee for the Use of the Language, group Ben: Robert Ben Madison, called “Ben” or “King that directs the Talossan language Robert” (kind of confusing). Cybercits: Talossans who first found out about Berber Project: 1996 book on Talossa’s alleged Talossa from the internet. prehistory. Dandelion: Native-born Talossan. Berbers: Native inhabitants of North Africa, Davron: Right-wing teenagers (later adults) Dave supposedly among Talossa’s ‘spiritual ancestors.’ Kuenn and Ron Rosáis. BFT: Bob Fights Ticket. 1987-88 party. DDP: Democratic Dandipratic Party. Bradford Province: Brief secession from Vuode Distáin: Deputy Prime Minister. Province in 1992. Downer Woods: A nature preserve at UWM. Bugs, Bug Nations: Micronations (q.v.) that are Electrabase: Ben’s attic room, the “national capital” weirdly obsessed with Talossa. in 1994. CALL: Conservatives Against Liberal Laziness. Party EM200: Revival in 2003 of the 200 seat Cosâ system founded in 1988. of proportional representation. Cestoûr: Pronounced “chess-TOUR,” any non- Fifty-nine (59): Ben’s lucky number. Talossan foreigner. Florencia: Talossa’s smallest province, one of seven. Cézembre: Talossa’s island province, off the coast of FM: Foreign Minister. © 2004 Ben Madison, 3, http://www.talossa-rt.com FUN: Front uni pour la Nation, party founded in Peculiar Way: 1989 party, successor to the DDP. 1985. Pengöpäts: Talossa’s claim to an otherwise Glheþ: The Talossan word for “language,” it is pro- unclaimed chunk of Antarctica. nounced something like “yeth.” Penguinea: 1997 splitters from Talossa. Teamed up Glib Room Empire: Rival micronation founded in with more splitters in 2004, stole name “Talossa.” 1980. Për: A “yes” vote on a bill in the Ziu. GVB: “Glorious Victorious Ben,” high-school Për la Naziun: “For the Nation,” Talossa’s highest nickname for Ben. award, created in 1981. Integrity: The ~: Newspaper founded by Davron. PFPT: Peace and Freedom Party of Talossa. Pro- King Robert I: See “Ben.” Penguinean party from 1998. Kingdom of Talossa: See “Talossa.” PL: Liberal Party. KJK: Micronation founded in 1980. PM: Prime Minister. KRI: King Robert I. See “Ben.” Pocket Vote: Anyone less active than you, who votes L’Avîntguárd: Short-lived ZPT paper. against you, is somebody else’s “pocket vote.” Liberal Party (PL): Several RT parties have gone by Pórt Maxhestic: Former RT province; see Maritiimi- this now thoroughly discredited name. Maxhestic. Libs: Liberal Party members. Prime Minister: Leader of the majority party (or Loom of Language: Ancient language book, parties) in the Cosâ. Talossan PM’s are sworn in on it, by tradition. PUNK: People United for No King, party founded in Maricopa: Talossa’s southwestern province, one of 1986. seven. RCT: Rally of the Citizens of Talossa, left-wing Maritiimi: Former RT province; see Maritiimi- opposition party from 1999 to 2003. Maxhestic. Real Cosâ: 20-seat Cosâ system, lasted 1997-2003. Maritiimi-Maxhestic: Talossa’s southernmost Regent: Temporary appointee who holds the King’s province, one of seven. powers while the King is abroad. MC: Member of the Cosâ. Regipäts Talossán: Talossan for “Kingdom of Micronation: Any self-proclaimed independent state Talossa.” RT. not widely recognized. Republic of Talossa: See “Penguinea.” MN: The Black Hand (La Mhà Nheagrâ), party Riverside High School: Alma mater for several early founded in 1985 and revived in 2002. Talossans, on Milwaukee’s East Side. MP: ‘Minor’ity Party, founded 1992 by two “minors.” RPR: Rally for the Kingdom. Two pro-monarchist Mussolini: Talossa’s northwestern province, one of parties used this name in 1986-88. seven. RT: Regipäts Talossán, Kingdom of Talossa. Napoleon’s: Till 2005, Wisconsin’s largest wargame Secretary of State: The guy who runs RT and gaming store; a Talossan cultural mecca. government business. Immensely powerful dude. Old Growthers: Any Talossans who aren’t Cybercits.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Will Bulgaria Become Monarchy Again?
    Southeast European Politics Vol. IV, No. 2-3 November 2003 pp. 157-174 Will Bulgaria Become Monarchy Again? ROSSEN VASSILEV The Ohio State University ABSTRACT This article deals with the much debated question of whether post-Communist Bulgaria should restore the monarchy abolished by the 1946 referendum. The prospects for bringing back the monarchy are believed to be negligible, given the existing constitutional hurdles and the population’s pro-republican sentiments. But ex-King Simeon’s triumph in the June 2001 parliamentary election has dramatically changed his standing at home. Any restoration of the monarchy will depend on the perceived success of his coalition government, especially in rebuilding the ailing national economy. It is questionable whether Simeon II will be able to live up to the overoptimistic expectations of Bulgarians who believe that like a Messiah he will save their country from the economic, social, political and institutional turmoil into which it has descended. But with a population distrustful of the politically bankrupt old parties and politicians and despondent enough to grasp at straws, a revival of the monarchy cannot be ruled out. Introduction Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan consider the issue of constitutions and constitutional formulas to be a significant, if neglected, aspect of democratic transitions (Linz and Stepan 1996: 81-83). They offer a classification of six different possible constitution-making environments, ranging from those that present the most confining conditions for democratization to those
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • SLAVOPHILES and COMMISSARS Also by Judith Devlin
    SLAVOPHILES AND COMMISSARS Also by Judith Devlin RELIGION AND REBELLION (editor with Ronan Fanning) THE RISE OF THE RUSSIAN DEMOCRATS: the Causes and Consequences of the Elite Revolution THE SUPERSTITIOUS MIND: French Peasants and the Supernatural in Nineteenth-Century France Slavophiles and Commissars Enemies of Democracy in Modern Russia Judith Devlin Lecturer in Modern History University College, Dublin First published in Great Britain 1999 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-349-40232-8 ISBN 978-0-333-98320-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780333983201 First published in the United States of America 1999 by ST. MARTIN’S PRESS, INC., Scholarly and Reference Division, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Devlin, Judith, 1952– Slavophiles and commissars : enemies of democracy in modern Russia / Judith Devlin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Russia (Federation)—Politics and government—1991– 2. Nationalism—Russia (Federation) 3. Authoritarianism—Russia (Federation) 4. Russia (Federation)—Intellectual life—1991– I. Title. DK510.763.D486 1999 320.947'09'049—dc21 98–50836 CIP © Judith Devlin 1999 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1999 978-0-333-69933-1 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Russia in the Global Parliamentary Moment, 1905–1918: Between a Subaltern Empire and an Empire of Subalterns
    Ivan Sablin 11 Russia in the Global Parliamentary Moment, 1905–1918: Between a Subaltern Empire and an Empire of Subalterns Introduction The establishment of the legislative State Duma (17 October 1905)1 and the adop- tion of the Fundamental Laws of the Russian Empire (23 April 1906) by Tsar Nicholas II during the Revolution of 1905–1907 seemed to make Russia a consti- tutional state. In 1907, Vladimir Matveevich Gessen and Boris Emmanuilovich Nol’de, two prominent liberal legal scholars, listed Russia, together with Persia and Montenegro, as the new constitutional states in their comprehensive collec- tion of contemporary constitutions. Articulating a popular progressive view, they claimed that the failures of the Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905) unmasked the inefficiency of bureaucratic autocracy, spreading the critical attitudes to the an- cien régime beyond intellectual circles and transforming them into a broad liber- ation movement across the whole country.2 Few intellectuals, however, viewed the Duma as a parliament equal to its Western counterparts. It occupied a subordinate position to the State Council, which was reformed into a partly appointed upper chamber, and did not con- trol the cabinet, which contributed to the term “sham constitutionalism”.3 The non-universal, indirect, and unequal elections were further limited with the 1 All dates are given in the Old Style, which is according to the Julian calendar. 2 V. M. Gessen and B. E. Nol’de (eds.), Sovremennye Konstitutsii: Sbornik Deistvuiushchikh Konstitutsionnykh Aktov [Contemporary Constitutions: A Collection of Constitutional Acts in Force], vol. 2: Federatsii i Respubliki [Federations and Republics], Saint Petersburg: Pravo, 1907, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality and the 2014 New Zealand General Election
    A BARK BUT NO BITE INEQUALITY AND THE 2014 NEW ZEALAND GENERAL ELECTION A BARK BUT NO BITE INEQUALITY AND THE 2014 NEW ZEALAND GENERAL ELECTION JACK VOWLES, HILDE COFFÉ AND JENNIFER CURTIN Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Vowles, Jack, 1950- author. Title: A bark but no bite : inequality and the 2014 New Zealand general election / Jack Vowles, Hilde Coffé, Jennifer Curtin. ISBN: 9781760461355 (paperback) 9781760461362 (ebook) Subjects: New Zealand. Parliament--Elections, 2014. Elections--New Zealand. New Zealand--Politics and government--21st century. Other Creators/Contributors: Coffé, Hilde, author. Curtin, Jennifer C, author. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press This edition © 2017 ANU Press Contents List of figures . vii List of tables . xiii List of acronyms . xvii Preface and acknowledgements . .. xix 1 . The 2014 New Zealand election in perspective . .. 1 2. The fall and rise of inequality in New Zealand . 25 3 . Electoral behaviour and inequality . 49 4. The social foundations of voting behaviour and party funding . 65 5. The winner! The National Party, performance and coalition politics . 95 6 . Still in Labour . 117 7 . Greening the inequality debate . 143 8 . Conservatives compared: New Zealand First, ACT and the Conservatives .
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising and the Market Orientation of Political Parties Contesting the 1999 and 2002 New Zealand General Election Campaigns
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. ADVERTISING AND THE MARKET ORIENTATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES CONTESTING THE 1999 AND 2002 NEW ZEALAND GENERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS A THESIS PRESENTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICS AT MASSEY UNIVERSITY, PALMERSTON NORTH, NEW ZEALAND. CLAIRE ELIZABETH ROBINSON 2006 i ABSTRACT This thesis proposes an alternative way of establishing a link between market orientation and electoral success, by focusing on market orientation as a message instead of as a management function. Using interpretive textual analysis the thesis examines the advertising messages of the highest polling political parties for evidence of voter orientation and competitor orientation in the 1999 and 2002 New Zealand general election campaigns. Relating manifest market orientation to a number of statistical indicators of electoral success the thesis looks for plausible associations between the visual manifestation of market orientation in political advertisements and parties’ achievement of their party vote goals in the 1999 and 2002 elections. It offers party-focused explanations for electoral outcomes to complement existing voter-centric explanations, and adds another level of scholarly understanding of recent electoral outcomes in New Zealand. While the thesis finds little association between demonstration ofcompetitor orientation in political advertisements and electoral success, it finds a plausible relationship between parties that demonstrated a voter orientation in their political advertisements and goal achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Religious Political Parties in the USSR
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 12 Issue 3 Article 5 6-1992 Formation of Religious Political Parties in the USSR Sergey Deriugin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Deriugin, Sergey (1992) "Formation of Religious Political Parties in the USSR," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 12 : Iss. 3 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol12/iss3/5 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FORMATION OF RELIGIOUS POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE USSR by Sergey Deriugin Dr. Sergey Deriugin, at the time this article was written in the Spring of 1991, worked as a researcher in the Institute for Social Sciences in Moscow and became the vice-editor of a proposed journal, "Disput." This paper was written for a conference that took place in Budapest in May 1991 and reflects the situation prior to the dissolution of the USSR. His articles appeared previously in OPREE. Presently, in the USSR, the method of forming multi-parties is developing within the political system. The constituent congresses of all kinds of political parties took place. Social-democratic, socialist, republican, liberal-democratic, anarchist, and many other parties declared their foundation as consisting of corresponding orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ár Päts the Classic History of the Kingdom of Talossa 1979-2008
    http://www.talossa1979.com Ár Päts The Classic History of the Kingdom of Talossa 1979-2008 É É É R. BEN MADISON, M.A. É É É Published by Preßeu Støtanneu Abbavilla, Atatürk, RT Ár Päts, 2008 Edition Copyright © 1997-2008 by R. Ben Madison É É É All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, quoted or paraphrased, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, internet, or any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the author. “Talossa” is a registered trademark and any unauthorized use of the word is a violation of US and international law. http://www.talossa1979.com -1- PREFACE: What is the Kingdom of Talossa? Ár Päts means “Our Country.” And I founded our country – the Kingdom of Talossa – on December 26, 1979, when I was fourteen years old, in a public ceremony in my father’s living room in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The micronation of Talossa has been an amazing ride for 28 years. It all started when I was a high school sophomore learning German and dreaming of worlds beyond my boring home. The day after Christmas in 1979, I declared my bedroom to be its own “independent, sovereign country,” the Kingdom of Talossa, with me as its monarch, as well as its only citizen. This gave me the opportunity to draw maps and flags, and even to design my own Talossan language. Instead of dying out right away like it should have, the political adventure called Talossa has grown into a worldwide community of members from the US, Canada, Italy, France, Brazil, Argentina, and elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanov Empire: Anton Bakov Anuncia La Impresionante Restauración Del Estado De La Dinastía Romanov Tras Una Interrupción De 100 Años
    Romanov Empire: Anton Bakov anuncia la impresionante restauración del Estado de la Dinastía Romanov tras una interrupción de 100 años YEKATERINBURG, Rusia y BANJUL, Gambia, December 8, 2017/PRNewswire/ -- El fundador del Monarchist Party of Russia dio una rueda de prensa en el centro de prensa TASS de Yekaterinburg el 6 de diciembre. Según Bakov, los documentos que apoyan su anuncio se hicieron públicos de forma deliberada y simbólica en Yekaterinburg. Se eligió esta ciudad al haber sido testigo del acto más repelente y despiadado de regicidio. Durante la celebración de la rueda de prensa, se presentó a los periodistas un Memorando de Amistad y Cooperación firmado entre la República de Gambia y el Romanov Empire, que se firmó el 1 de diciembre en Banjul por medio del secretario general de Gambia, Dawda D. Fadera, y el Ministro de Asuntos Exteriores del Romanov Empire, Modou Lamin Saidykhan. Si desea ver el comunicado multimedia haga click en: https://www.multivu.com/players/uk/8236851-anton-bakov-restoration-romanov- dynasty/ Según el documento indicado, la parte occidental de la República Africana de Gambia se convirtió en el primer gobierno en reconocer oficialmente al Romanov Empire y crear contactos diplomáticos con él. A cambio, el Romanov Empire acordó el pago de 60 millones de dólares estadounidenses al presupuesto de Gambia. El nuevo Romanov Empire se situará en las islas artificiales con una masa terrestre de 10 km² en las aguas territoriales de la República de Gambia. El territorio de las islas, que presenta cinco veces el tamaño de Mónaco, estará bajo la jurisdicción soberana del imperio.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogy of the Idea of Monarchy in the Post-Soviet Political Discourse of the Russian Orthodox Church
    The Genealogy of the Idea of Monarchy in the Post-Soviet Political Discourse of the Russian Orthodox Church Suslov, Mikhail Published in: State, Religion and Church Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Suslov, M. (2016). The Genealogy of the Idea of Monarchy in the Post-Soviet Political Discourse of the Russian Orthodox Church. State, Religion and Church, 3(1), 27-62. Download date: 27. sep.. 2021 MIKHAIL SUSLOV The Genealogy of the Idea of Monarchy in the Post-Soviet Political Discourse of the Russian Orthodox Church Translation by Jan Surer Mikhail Suslov — Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University (Sweden). [email protected] This article focuses on the concept of monarchy with an em- phasis on the traditional Russian “autocratic” model. Mikhail Suslov inquires into the ways this concept is being used in to- day’s Russian Orthodox Church and in the circles of religious- ly motivated intellectuals. Informed by the “contextualist” tra- dition in conceptual history, this article traces the concept of monarchy back to pre-revolutionary and émigré thinkers and argues that two understandings of the term have been evolv- ing throughout Russia’s modern history: the tradition of “di- vine kingship” (tsarebozhie), now largely marginalized, and the Slavophile interpretation that shifted substantially toward the idea of popular sovereignty and is now dominant in ofcial and mainstream Orthodox political thought. The Slavophile concept of monarchy is internally contradictory and unstable, making its usage problematic, but, at the same time, it opens the possibility for new and original theorizing.
    [Show full text]
  • CSESII Parties and Leaders Original CSES Text Plus CCNER Additions (Highlighted)
    CSESII Parties and Leaders Original CSES text plus CCNER additions (highlighted) =========================================================================== ))) APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS =========================================================================== | NOTES: PARTIES AND LEADERS | | This appendix identifies parties active during a polity's | election and (where available) their leaders. | | Provided are the party labels for the codes used in the micro | data variables. Parties A through F are the six most popular | parties, listed in descending order according to their share of | the popular vote in the "lowest" level election held (i.e., | wherever possible, the first segment of the lower house). | | Note that in countries represented with more than a single | election study the order of parties may change between the two | elections. | | Leaders A through F are the corresponding party leaders or | presidential candidates referred to in the micro data items. | This appendix reports these names and party affiliations. | | Parties G, H, and I are supplemental parties and leaders | voluntarily provided by some election studies. However, these | are in no particular order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: ALBANIA (2005) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 02. Party A PD Democratic Party Sali Berisha 01. Party B PS Socialist Party Fatos Nano 04. Party C PR Republican Party Fatmir Mediu 05. Party D PSD Social Democratic Party Skender Gjinushi 03. Party E LSI Socialist Movement for Integration Ilir Meta 10. Party F PDR New Democratic Party Genc Pollo 09. Party G PAA Agrarian Party Lufter Xhuveli 08. Party H PAD Democratic Alliance Party Neritan Ceka 07. Party I PDK Christian Democratic Party Nikolle Lesi 06. LZhK Movement of Leka Zogu I Leka Zogu 11. PBDNj Human Rights Union Party 12. Union for Victory (Partia Demokratike+ PR+PLL+PBK+PBL) 89.
    [Show full text]