DOCSLIB.ORG

CSESII Parties and Leaders Original CSES Text Plus CCNER Additions (Highlighted)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CSESII Parties and Leaders Original CSES Text Plus CCNER Additions (Highlighted) CSESII Parties and Leaders Original CSES text plus CCNER additions (highlighted) =========================================================================== ))) APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS =========================================================================== | NOTES: PARTIES AND LEADERS | | This appendix identifies parties active during a polity's | election and (where available) their leaders. | | Provided are the party labels for the codes used in the micro | data variables. Parties A through F are the six most popular | parties, listed in descending order according to their share of | the popular vote in the "lowest" level election held (i.e., | wherever possible, the first segment of the lower house). | | Note that in countries represented with more than a single | election study the order of parties may change between the two | elections. | | Leaders A through F are the corresponding party leaders or | presidential candidates referred to in the micro data items. | This appendix reports these names and party affiliations. | | Parties G, H, and I are supplemental parties and leaders | voluntarily provided by some election studies. However, these | are in no particular order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: ALBANIA (2005) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 02. Party A PD Democratic Party Sali Berisha 01. Party B PS Socialist Party Fatos Nano 04. Party C PR Republican Party Fatmir Mediu 05. Party D PSD Social Democratic Party Skender Gjinushi 03. Party E LSI Socialist Movement for Integration Ilir Meta 10. Party F PDR New Democratic Party Genc Pollo 09. Party G PAA Agrarian Party Lufter Xhuveli 08. Party H PAD Democratic Alliance Party Neritan Ceka 07. Party I PDK Christian Democratic Party Nikolle Lesi 06. LZhK Movement of Leka Zogu I Leka Zogu 11. PBDNj Human Rights Union Party 12. Union for Victory (Partia Demokratike+ PR+PLL+PBK+PBL) 89. Other | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - ALBANIA (2005): PARTIES AND LEADERS | | Please note that parties are ordered from A to I according to | their total seats share, after both candidate and party list | votes are taken into account (as reported in B5002). ! 1! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: AUSTRALIA (2004) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Party A Liberal Party of Australia John Howard 02. Party D National Party of Australia John Anderson 03. Party B Australian Labor Party Mark Latham 04. Party C Australian Greens Bob Brown 05. Party E Family First Steve Fielding 06. Party F Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett 07. Party G One Nation Pauline Hanson 08. Christian Democratic Party 09. Independent 10. Others --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: BELGIUM (2003) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Party A VLD Vlaamse Liberalen en Democraten Karel De Gucht (Flemish Liberals and Democrats) 02. Party B SP.A Socialistische Partij Anders Steve Stevaert (Socialist Party Differently) 03. Party C CD&V Christen-Democratisch & Vlaams Stefaan De Clercq (Christian Democratic & Flemish) 04. Party E Vlaams Blok (Flemish Block) Frank Van Hecke 05. Party H NV-A New Flemish Alliance Geert Bourgeouis (Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie) 06. Agalev/Groen! 07. RESIST 08. Vivant 09. Party D PS Parti Socialiste (Socialist Party) Elio Di Rupo 10. Party F MR Mouvement Rformateur (Reformist Danil Ducarme Movement) 11. Party G CDH Centre Dmocrate Humaniste Jolle Milquet (Humanist Democratic Centre) 12. Party I Ecolo De Feyt 13. FN Front National (National Front) 14. PTB-UA Parti du Travail de Belgique (Belgian Labor POarty) 15. FDF Front Dmocratique des Francophones Olivier Mangain (Democratic Francophones Front) 16. CVP Christelijke Volkspartij (Christian Peoples Party) 17. VU Volksunie (Peoples Union) 18. WOW Waardig Ouder Worden 19. PVDA-AE Partij Van De Arbeid 20. PSC Parti Social Chrtien 21. PRL-FDF Parti Rformateur Liberal 22. AGIR 23. SP Socialistische Partij 24. SPIRIT 50. Other | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - BELGIUM (2003): PARTIES AND LEADERS | ! 2! | Between the elections of 1999 and 2003 a number of parties | changed their names or ceased to exist. The changes have been as | follows: | | Old Name New name | ----------------------- | CVP CD&V | VU N-VA | WOW no longer exists | PSC CDH | SP SP.A-SPIRIT | PRL-FDF MR --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: BRAZIL (2002) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. Party A PT Workers Party Luiz Incio Lula da Silva (Partido dos Trabalhadores) 45. Party B PSDB Brazilian Social Jos Serra Democratic Party (Partido da Social Democracia Brasileira) 25. Party C PFL Party of the Liberal Antnio Carlos Magalhes Front 15. Party D PMDB Party of the Brazilian Jader Barbalho Democratic Movement 11. Party E PPB Brazilian Progressive Paulo Maluf Party (Partido Progressista Brasileiro) 40. Party F PSB Brazilian Socialist Anthony Garotinho Party (Partido Socialista Brasileiro) 12. Party G PDT Labor Democratic Party Leonel Brizola (Partido Democratico Trabalhista) 14. Party H PTB Brazilian Labor Party 22. Party I PL Liberal Party 16. PSTU 17. PSL 18. PST 21. PCB 23. PPS Popular Socialist Party Ciro Gomes (Partido Popular Socialista) 28. PRTB 27. PSDC 29. PCO 30. PSD 31. PMN 32. PNR 33. PSC 35. PRN 43. PV 44. PRP ! 3! 51. PDN 54. PP 56. PRONA National Order Eneas Carneiro Reconstruction Party (Partido da Reedificacao da Ordem Nacional) 65. PC do B 70. PT do B 89. Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: BULGARIA (2001) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Coalition For Bulgaria (CB - KzB) 02. Party B United Democratic Forces (UDF) 03. Party D Movement For Rights And Freedoms (MRF) 04. Party F Euroleft 05. The Bloc of G. Ganchev 07. Bulgarian Agricultural National Forces-United 08. Bulgarian Communist Party 09. Bulgarian Social Democratic Party (BDSP) 10. Fatherland Party Of Labour 15. Party E Movement 'Georgievden' 17. Christian Social Union 19. Bulgarian Agricultural National Forces, A. Mauser, National Union 21. Green Party 24. Coalition United Agricultural Forces 25. Party G Inner Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (VMRO) 30. National Union 50. Bulgarian Agricultural National Forces - 'N. Petkov' 52. Bulgarian Agricultural National Forces - 'Al. Stamboliski' 57. Eurorama 63. Party A National Movement Simeon The Second (NMS II - NDST) 66. Coalition: Georgievden, Inner Macedonian Revolutionary Organization 70. National Union, Fatherland Left 81. Coalition: Bulgarian Social Democratic Party, Democratic Left 82. Union For National Salvation 83. Euroleft 84. Bulgarian Business Bloc 85. Democratic Alternative For The Republic 86. Party C Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) 87. Union Bulgaria 89. Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: CANADA (2004) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Party A Liberal Party of Canada Rt. Hon. Paul Martin 02. Party B Conservative Party of Canada Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper 03. Party C New Democratic Party (NDP) Rt. Hon. Jack Layton 04. Party D Bloc Quebecois Hon. Gilles Duceppe 05. Alliance (Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance) ! 4! 06. Progressive Conservative Party 07. Reform 08. Party E Green Party Jim Harris 10. Marijuana Party 89. Other 90. None of them | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - CANADA (2004): PARTIES AND LEADERS | | On October 15, 2003 party "02. Conservative Party of Canada" was | created by the merger of parties "05. Canadian Alliance" and | "06. Progressive Conservative Party". --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: CHILE (2005) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Party A Unin Demcrata Independiente (Independent Joaqun Lavn Democrat Union-UDI) 02. Party B Partido Demcrata Cristiano (Christian Democrat Party-PDC) 03. Party C Partido Por la Democracia (Party for Democracy-PPD) 04. Party D Renovacin Nacional (National Renewal-RN) Sebastian Pinera 05. Party E Partido Socialista de Chile (Socialist Party of Chile-PS) Michelle Bachelet 06. Party F Partido Comunista de Chile (Communist Party of Chile-PC) 07. Party G Partido Radical Socialdemcrata (Social Democrat Radical Party-PRSD) 08. Partido Humanista (Humanist Party) Tomas Hirsch 09. Alianza Nacional de los Independientes (National Alliance of Independents) 10. Party H Concertacin (Concertation)(Independents List B within this alliance) 11. Juntos Podemos (Toghether We Can) 12. Party I Alianza por Chile (Alliance for Chile) (Independents List D within this alliance) 13. Partidos de derecha (Right wing party) 14. Partidos de Izquierda (Left wing party) 15. Independent Candidate 16. Other | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - CHILE (2006): PARTIES AND LEADERS | | The specified political leaders are the presidential candidates | of the 2005 contest. Michelle Bachelet was the candidate of the | center-left coalition the Concertation, which grouped the PDC, | PPD, PS and PRSD. Parties UDI and RN were members of the | Alliance for Chile coalition, but ran on separate candidates. | Parties PC and PH ran with one common candidate under the | coalition "Together we can do more". ! 5! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No. 701, November 20, 1998
    soC!: No. 701 ~X-623 20 November 1998 Down With. Starvation Blockade! U.S. Out of the Near East! • • et our ooav anas raq! NOVEMBER 17-Massively rein­ 1991, which included the use of de­ forcing its armada of warships, sub­ pleted uranium shells (see "Iraq marines, aircraft carriers, tighter­ Cancer Epidemic Made in U.S.A.," bombers and cruise missiles in the WV No. 690, 8 May). Down with Persian Gulf, U.S. imperialism is the starvation blockade! U.S. impe­ once again poised to unleash rialism: Get your bloody hands off bloody carnage on the Iraqi people. Iraq! The Clinton White House has now Fearful of stirring up domestic announced a postponement of the discontent, America's rulers rely military strike as the Iraqi regime on high-tech missile and bombing agreed to again allow free rein to strikes which minimize U.S. casu­ the imperialist spies who masque­ alties while wreaking devasta­ rade as "arms inspectors." Trum­ tion on the Iraqi population. peting Washington's aim of over­ An editorial in the New York Times throwing the Saddam Hussein (13 November), mouthpiece of regime, Clinton hellows, "Iraq has the liberal bourgeoisie, virtually backed down, but that is not screamed for Iraqi blood, calling enough." British Labour prime for a "sustained" bombing cam­ minister Tony Blair rants that the paign which would necessarily "slightest obstruction" of United include "a regrettable risk of civil­ Nations weapons inspectors will be ian casualties." met with an "immediate attack, no The repeated displays of terror warning whatever." Today's New by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report August 23, 2004
    Prepared by: LI Pang-kwong, Ph.D. Date: 10 April 2005 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 2: Macro Report August 23, 2004 Country: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, CHINA Date of Election: 12 September 2004 NOTE TO COLLABORATORS: The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Part I: Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1. Report the number of portfolios (cabinet posts) held by each party in cabinet, prior to the most recent election. (If one party holds all cabinet posts, simply write "all".) In the context of Hong Kong, the Executive Council (ExCo) can be regarded as the cabinet. The ExCo comprises the Official Members (all the Principal Officials in the Government Secretariat have been appointed concurrently the Official Members of the ExCo since July 2002) and the Non-official Members. The members of the ExCo are appointed by the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), while the Principal Officials are nominated by the Chief Executive and are appointed by the Central People’s Government of China. Name of Political Party Number of Portfolios Official Members (with portfolios) of the Executive Council: All the Official Members do not have party affiliation. Non-official Members (without portfolio) of the Executive Council: 1. Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong 1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation by Chunta Aragonesista (CHA) on the Situation of the Aragonese Minority Languages (Aragonese and Catalan)
    Presentation by Chunta Aragonesista (CHA) on the situation of the Aragonese minority languages (Aragonese and Catalan) European Parliament Intergroup on Traditional Minorities, National Communities and Languages Strasbourg, 24 May 2012 Aragon is one of the historical nations on which the current Spanish State was set up. Since its origins back in the 9 th century in the central Pyrenees, two languages were born and grew up on its soil: Aragonese and Catalan (the latter originated simultaneously in Catalonia as well as in some areas that have always belonged to Aragon). Both languages expanded Southwards from the mountains down to the Ebro basin, Iberian mountains and Mediterranean shores in medieval times, and became literary languages by their use in the court of the Kings of Aragon, who also were sovereigns of Valencia, Catalonia and Majorca. In the 15 th century a dynastic shift gave the Crown of Aragon to a Castilian prince. The new reigning family only expressed itself in Castilian language. That fact plus the mutual influences of Castilian and Aragonese through their common borders, as well as the lack of a strong linguistic awareness in Aragon facilitated a change in the cultural trends of society. From then on the literary and administrative language had to be Castilian and the old Aragonese and Catalan languages got relegated in Aragon mostly to rural areas or the illiterate. That process of ‘glottophagy’ or language extinction sped up through the 17 th and 18 th centuries, especially after the conquest of the country by the King Philip of Bourbon during the Spanish War of Succession and its annexation to Castile.
    [Show full text]
  • Senatorial Candidates 2016
    SENATORIAL CANDIDATES 2016 POST NAME PARTY NAME IN BALLOT Senator Albani, Ibrahim Independent Albani, Shariff (IND) Senator Ali, Alexander Alimmudin Partido ng Manggagawa at Ali, Aldin (WPPPMM) Magsasaka Senator Alunan, Rafael III Independent Alunan, Raffy (IND) Senator Ambolodto, Nariman Liberal Party Ambolodto, Ina (LP) Senator Aquino, Antonio Independent Aquino, Tonyboy (IND) Senator Arquiza, Godofredo Independent Arquiza, Godofredo (IND) Senator Baligod, Levito Independent Baligod, Levito (IND) Senator Belgica, Greco Antonious Independent Belgica, Greco (IND) Beda Senator Bello, Walden Independent Bello, Walden (IND) Senator Cam, Sandra Pwersa ng Masang Pilipino Cam, Sandra (PMP) Senator Catmon, Joel Philippine Green Republican Catmon, Joel (PGRP) Party Senator Chavez, Melchor Partido ng Manggagawa at Chavez, Mel (WPPPMM) Magsasaka Senator Colmenares, Neri Makabayan Colmenares, Neri (MKBYN) Senator De Lima, Leila Norma Liberal Party De Lima, Leila (LP) Eulalia Josefa Senator Domagoso, Francisco Pwersa ng Masang Pilipino Domagoso, Isko Moreno (PMP) Senator Dorona, Ray Independent Dorona, Ray (IND) Senator Drilon, Franklin Liberal Party Drilon, Frank (LP) Senator Gadon, Lorenzo Kilusang Bagong Lipunan Gadon, Larry (KBL) Senator Gatchalian, Sherwin Nationalist People's Coalition Gatchalian, Win (NPC) Senator Gordon, Richard Independent Gordon, Dick (IND) Senator Guingona, Teofisto III Liberal Party Guingona, TG (LP) Senator Hontiveros, Ana Theresia Akbayan Hontiveros, Risa (AKBYN) Senator Jaafar, Jay Angelique Independent Jaafar, Princess Angel (IND) Senator Kabalu, Mustapha Independent Kabalu, Eid (IND) Senator Kapunan, Lorna Aksyon Demokratiko Kapunan, Atty. Lorna (AKSYON) Senator Kiram, Princess Jacel United Nationalist Alliance Kiram, Princess Jacel (UNA) Senator Lacsamana, Venesa United Nationalist Alliance Lacsamana, Alma Moreno (UNA) Senator Lacson, Panfilo Independent Lacson, Panfilo (IND) Senator Lagare, Sixto Independent Lagare, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe
    This page intentionally left blank Populist radical right parties in Europe As Europe enters a significant phase of re-integration of East and West, it faces an increasing problem with the rise of far-right political par- ties. Cas Mudde offers the first comprehensive and truly pan-European study of populist radical right parties in Europe. He focuses on the par- ties themselves, discussing them both as dependent and independent variables. Based upon a wealth of primary and secondary literature, this book offers critical and original insights into three major aspects of European populist radical right parties: concepts and classifications; themes and issues; and explanations for electoral failures and successes. It concludes with a discussion of the impact of radical right parties on European democracies, and vice versa, and offers suggestions for future research. cas mudde is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Political Science at the University of Antwerp. He is the author of The Ideology of the Extreme Right (2000) and the editor of Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe (2005). Populist radical right parties in Europe Cas Mudde University of Antwerp CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521850810 © Cas Mudde 2007 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 European Elections the Weight of the Electorates Compared to the Electoral Weight of the Parliamentary Groups
    2019 European Elections The weight of the electorates compared to the electoral weight of the parliamentary groups Guillemette Lano Raphaël Grelon With the assistance of Victor Delage and Dominique Reynié July 2019 2019 European Elections. The weight of the electorates | Fondation pour l’innovation politique I. DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN THE WEIGHT OF ELECTORATES AND THE ELECTORAL WEIGHT OF PARLIAMENTARY GROUPS The Fondation pour l’innovation politique wished to reflect on the European elections in May 2019 by assessing the weight of electorates across the European constituency independently of the electoral weight represented by the parliamentary groups comprised post-election. For example, we have reconstructed a right-wing Eurosceptic electorate by aggregating the votes in favour of right-wing national lists whose discourses are hostile to the European Union. In this case, for instance, this methodology has led us to assign those who voted for Fidesz not to the European People’s Party (EPP) group but rather to an electorate which we describe as the “populist right and extreme right” in which we also include those who voted for the Italian Lega, the French National Rally, the Austrian FPÖ and the Sweden Democrats. Likewise, Slovak SMER voters were detached from the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) Group and instead categorised as part of an electorate which we describe as the “populist left and extreme left”. A. The data collected The electoral results were collected list by list, country by country 1, from the websites of the national parliaments and governments of each of the States of the Union. We then aggregated these data at the European level, thus obtaining: – the number of individuals registered on the electoral lists on the date of the elections, or the registered voters; – the number of votes, or the voters; – the number of valid votes in favour of each of the lists, or the votes cast; – the number of invalid votes, or the blank or invalid votes.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSP Background Variable Documentation in the Philippines
    1 ISSP Background Variable Documentation in the Philippines ISSP 2005 Module on Work Orientations III SEX - Sex of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. ISSP1/Sex. Gender of PR ISSP1/Sex. Gender of PR and text Codes/ 1 Male 1 Male Categories 2 Female 2 Female Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: Country Variable Codes (in translation) SEX 1. Male 1. Male 2. Female 2. Female -not used- 9. No answer, refused Documentation for ISSP background variables © ZA/ZUMA-GESIS 2 AGE - Age of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. ISSP2/AGE. Actual Age ISSP2/AGE. Actual Age and text Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: (list lowest, highest, and ‘missing’ codes only, replace terms in [square brackets] with real numbers) Country Variable Codes/Construction Rules AGE Construction Codes 18 years old [18] 89 years old [89] 97. No answer, 99. Refused 99. No answer, refused Optional: Recoding Syntax Documentation for ISSP background variables © ZA/ZUMA-GESIS 3 MARITAL - R: Marital status National Language English Translation Question no. ISSP3. Marital Status of PR ISSP3. Marital Status of PR and text 1 May asawa 1 Married 2 Balo 2 Widowed 3 Diborsyado 3 Divorced Codes/ 4 Hiwalay 4 Separated/Married but separated/ not Categories living with legal spouse 5 Walang asawa 5 Single/never married 9 No answer 9 No answer Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: Country Variable Codes/Construction Rules Marital 1. Married 1. Married, living with legal spouse 2. Widowed 2. Widowed 3. Divorced 3. Divorced 4. Separated/Married but separated/ not living with 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Slovenia On
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND LEGAL AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE OF MONITORING Strasbourg, 7 December 2007 Public Greco Eval III Rep (2007) 1E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Slovenia on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II) Adopted by GRECO at its 35 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 3-7 December 2007) Secrétariat du GRECO GRECO Secretariat www.coe.int/greco Conseil de l’Europe Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex +33 3 88 41 20 00 Fax +33 3 88 41 39 55 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Slovenia joined GRECO in 1999. GRECO adopted the First Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval I Rep (2000) 3E) in respect of Slovenia at its 4 th Plenary Meeting (12-15 December 2000) and the Second Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval II Rep (2003) 1E) at its 16 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 8-12 December 2003). The aforementioned Evaluation Reports, as well as their corresponding Compliance Reports, are available on GRECO’s homepage (http://www.coe.int/greco ). 2. GRECO’s current Third Evaluation Round (launched on 1 January 2007) deals with the following themes: - Theme I – Incriminations: Articles 1a and 1b, 2-12, 15-17, 19 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS 173) 1, Articles 1-6 of its Additional Protocol 2 (ETS 191) and Guiding Principle 2 (criminalisation of corruption). - Theme II – Transparency of party funding: Articles 11, 12, 13b, 14 and 16 of Recommendation Rec(2003)4 on Common Rules against Corruption in the Funding of Political Parties and Electoral Campaigns, and - more generally - Guiding Principle 15 (financing of political parties and election campaigns) .
    [Show full text]
  • C O N T E N T S President's Foreword Group Photo Of
    C O N T E N T S PRESIDENT'S FOREWORD GROUP PHOTO OF MEMBERS MAJOR EVENTS IN PICTURES CHAPTER 1 The Legislative Council Powers and Functions Composition CHAPTER 2 Legislative Council Meetings Tabling of Subsidiary Legislation and Other Papers Questions Statements Bills Motions Policy Address Debate Budget Debate Other Debates Chief Executive's Question and Answer Sessions Address by the Chief Executive CHAPTER 3 Committees Finance Committee Public Accounts Committee Committee on Members' Interests House Committee - Other Subcommittees of the House Committee Committee on Rules of Procedure Bills Committees and Subcommittees on Subsidiary Legislation Panels CHAPTER 4 Redress System Analysis of Significant Cases Dealt With Other Significant Cases CHAPTER 5 Liaison Parliamentary Liaison Subcommittee Luncheons with Consuls-General Contact with District Councils Contact with Heung Yee Kuk Visitors CHAPTER 6 Support Services for Members The Legislative Council Commission The Legislative Council Secretariat A P P E N D I C E S APPENDIX 1 Composition of the Legislative Council APPENDIX 2 Members' Biographies APPENDIX 3 Bills Passed APPENDIX 4 Motion Debates Held APPENDIX 5 Membership of Legislative Council Committees (By Committtees and By Members) APPENDIX 6 Statistical Breakdown of all Concluded Cases under the Legislative Council Redress System in the 2007-2008 Session APPENDIX 7 The Legislative Council Commission and its Committees APPENDIX 8 Organization Chart of the Legislative Council Secretariat P R E S I D E N T ' S F O R E W O R D The 2007-2008 session of the Third Legislative Council was meaningful and memorable. Not only was it the last legislative year of the term, it was also the last for me as President of the Legislative Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Comparative Politics 2
    Volume 4, Number 1, January 2011 CompaJ O U R N A Lr Oa F tive Politics ISSN 1338-1385 GG ANGEVALUATIONGOFGTHEGQUALITYGOFGIMPACTG ASSESSMENT:G THEGCASEGOFGSLOVAKIAGANDGSLOVENIA Katarína STAROŇOVÁ GG CENTRAL-EUROPEANGINTRA-SLAVICGDIPLOMACY:GG AGCOMPARATIVEGAPPROACH Boštjan UDOVIČ GG DIMENSIONSGOFGPARTYGELECTORALGPROGRAMMES:GG SLOVENIANGEXPERIENCE Simona KUSTEC LIPICER and Samo KROPIVNIK GG HYBRIDIZATIONGOFGDEMOCRACYGINGCENTRALGANDG EASTERNGEUROPE:G BETWEENG“IMPORTED”GDEMOCRATICGMODELGANDGINHERENTG POLITICALGCULTURE Cirila TOPLAK GG FORGTHEGCOMMONGGOOD:G COMBATINGGCORRUPTIONGINGNEWGEUGMEMBERGSTATES Lars JOHANNSEN and Karin HILMER PEDERSEN Journal of Comparative Politics 2 Editorial Team General Editor General Editor Miro Haček Peter Csányi Department of Political Science Pan European University Faculty of Social Sciences Institute of Political Science University of Ljubljana Tomášikova 20, 821 02 Kardeljeva ploščad 5, Ljubljana, Slovenia Bratislava, Slovakia [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Irena Bačlija Department of Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ljubljana Kardeljeva ploščad 5, Ljubljana, Slovenia [email protected] JCP uses two-sided peer review process before publication. Those wishing to sub- mit papers should send their e-version to either of the General Editors at one of the addresses above in compliance with the Submission Guidelines. The views ex- pressed are neither those of either of co-publishers. Authors retain sole copyright. Articles appearing in JCP are
    [Show full text]
  • Second-Order Elections: Everyone, Everywhere? Regional and National Considerations in Regional Voting
    Liñeira, R. (2016) Second-order elections: everyone, everywhere? Regional and national considerations in regional voting. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 46(4), pp. 510- 538. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/219966/ Deposited on: 15 July 2020 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Second-order Elections: Everyone, Everywhere? Regional and National Considerations in Regional Voting Robert Liñeira University of Edinburgh [email protected] Abstract: Vote choice in regional elections is commonly explained as dependent on national politics and occasionally as an autonomous decision driven by region-specific factors. However, few arguments and little evidence have been provided regarding the determinants that drive voters’ choices to one end or the other of this dependency-autonomy continuum. In this article we claim that contextual and individual factors help to raise (or lower) the voters’ awareness of their regional government, affecting the scale of considerations (national or regional) they use to cast their votes at regional elections. Using survey data from regional elections in Spain, we find that voters’ decisions are more autonomous from national politics among the more politically sophisticated voters, among those who have stronger feelings of attachment to their region, and in those contexts in which the regional incumbent party is different from the national one. In their landmark article Reif and Schmitt (1980) drew a distinction between first and second- order elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 2 Sweden Election 2002
    MODULE 2 SWEDEN ELECTION 2002 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Swedish data set for CSES module 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The election was held on September 15, 2002. Local and regional elections were held at the same time. The Swedish election study is separated into two samples, one pre election sample and one post election sample. The CSES module 2 is included in the post election part of the study. The CSES Module 2 data set include 1 060 respondents. Due to Swedish data laws the respondents in the Swedish election study 2002 were asked if they agreed to that their answers would be a part of international data set accessible on the Internet. Among the respondents there were 6 percent (70 respondents) which disagreed to this. The table below show the proportion of respondents that agreed and did not agreed in different social and political groups. For example the results shows that women, elderly, persons living outside large towns or cities and low educated people were somewhat more negative to that their answers would be accessible on the Internet. agree data on disagree data Internet on Internet sum percent n gender male 95 5 100 574 female 92 8 100 556 age 18-22 97 3 100 238 23-60 94 6 100 660 61-85 90 10 100 232 rural/urban rural area 91 9 100 189 small village 92 8 100 238 suburb to large town or city 93 7 100 235 large town or city 96 4 100 467 education low 89 11 100 205 middle 95 5 100 560 high 97 3 100 358 political interest
    [Show full text]