Minsk Region Preliminary Approximate No Land Plot Location Possible Ways of Use Infrastructure Cadastral Value, Area, Ha Thsd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Childrens' Names That Appear on This List Were Taken from Pages of Testimony Submitted to Yad Vashem
The childrens' names that appear on this list were taken from Pages of Testimony submitted to Yad Vashem Family name First name Father's name Age Place of residence Place of death Date of death ABOULAFIA ODETTE MARCO 8 FRANCE AUSCHWITZ 1944 ABOULAFIA ROSE MARCO 12 FRANCE AUSCHWITZ 1944 ABRAMOV YEVDO ABRAM 1 USSR YEVPATORIYA, KRYM, RUSSIA (USSR) 1942 ABRAMOVICH LIOVA NAKHMAN 4 USSR KHMELNIK, VINNITSA, UKRAINE (USSR) 1943 ABRAMOVICH PESL ELIA 8 USSR KHMELNIK, VINNITSA, UKRAINE (USSR) 1943 ABRAMOVICH PESL NAKHMAN 7 USSR KHMELNIK, VINNITSA, UKRAINE (USSR) 1943 ABRAMOVITCH BORIS RUVIM 17 LITHUANIA KUNDA, ESTONIA 1944 ABRAMOWICZ SIMON RAFAEL 10 POLAND AUSCHWITZ 1942 ABRAMZON EMA BORIS 10 USSR ROSONY, VITEBSK, BELORUSSIA (USSR) 12/01/42 ABRAMZON LIUDMILA BORIS 7 USSR ROSONY, VITEBSK, BELORUSSIA (USSR) 12/01/42 ABRAMZON MARIA BORIS 4 USSR ROSONY, VITEBSK, BELORUSSIA (USSR) 12/01/42 ABUKOVSKI SHEINDEL ISRAEL 8 POLAND LODZ, POLAND 1945 ADELSON BENTZION SHIMON 11 POLAND PONARY, WILNO, POLAND 1942 Yad Vashem - Hall of Names 1/79 The childrens' names that appear on this list were taken from Pages of Testimony submitted to Yad Vashem Family name First name Father's name Age Place of residence Place of death Date of death ADLER ADEL DEZSO 6 HUNGARY AUSCHWITZ 1944 ADLER ENDRE GYULA 11 HUNGARY AUSCHWITZ 1944 ADLER JENO DEZSO 4 HUNGARY AUSCHWITZ 1944 ADLER LASZLO KAROLY 12 HUNGARY AUSCHWITZ 1944 ADLER MARIANNE MANO 10 HUNGARY AUSCHWITZ 1944 ADLER OTTO KAROLY 6 HUNGARY AUSCHWITZ 1944 ADLER WOLF ANSHEL 17 POLAND AUSCHWITZ 1943 AHARONOVIZ YTZKHAK KHAYIM 12 -
ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern Eine Beschäftigung I
ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern eine Beschäftigung i. S. d. ZRBG schon vor dem angegebenen Eröffnungszeitpunkt glaubhaft gemacht ist, kann für die folgenden Gebiete auf den Beginn der Ghettoisierung nach Verordnungslage abgestellt werden: - Generalgouvernement (ohne Galizien): 01.01.1940 - Galizien: 06.09.1941 - Bialystok: 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ostland (Weißrussland/Weißruthenien): 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ukraine (Wolhynien/Shitomir): 05.09.1941 Eine Vorlage an die Untergruppe ZRBG ist in diesen Fällen nicht erforderlich. Datum der Nr. Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Deportationen: Bemerkungen: Quelle: Ergänzung Abaujszanto, 5613 Ungarn, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, Braham: Abaújszántó [Hun] 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Kassa, Auschwitz 27.04.2010 (5010) Operationszone I Enciklopédiája (Szántó) Reichskommissariat Aboltsy [Bel] Ostland (1941-1944), (Oboltsy [Rus], 5614 Generalbezirk 14.08.1941 04.06.1942 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, 2001 24.03.2009 Oboltzi [Yid], Weißruthenien, heute Obolce [Pol]) Gebiet Vitebsk Abony [Hun] (Abon, Ungarn, 5443 Nagyabony, 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 2001 11.11.2009 Operationszone IV Szolnokabony) Ungarn, Szeged, 3500 Ada 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Braham: Enciklopédiája 09.11.2009 Operationszone IV Auschwitz Generalgouvernement, 3501 Adamow Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 20.12.1942 Kossoy, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 09.11.2009 1944) Reichskommissariat Aizpute 3502 Ostland (1941-1944), 02.08.1941 27.10.1941 USHMM 02.2008 09.11.2009 (Hosenpoth) Generalbezirk -
8. Regions and Regional Planning
8. REGIONS AND REGIONAL PLANNING Spatial inequalities and regions at a glance The most sparsely populated area is Paliessie, which lies in the south. The only exceptions Whereas landscapes in Belarus change from within this area are the eastern and western gate- north to south (e.g. from the Belarusian Lakeland ways of Brest and Homieĺ, which are the admin- in the north to the Paliessie region in the south), istrative centres of the region. in terms of socio-economic development the Brest, which is the location of the largest country exhibits an east-west gradient as well border crossing in the west, is famous for its as regional differences that reflect centre-pe- fortress. The Bielaviežskaja Pušča National Park riphery disparities. Some of these inequalities near Brest is a World Heritage Nature Reserve. It can be traced back to the period when the coun- received this status as Europe’s largest primeval try’s western regions formed a part of Poland forest. The pride of the park is its population of (Kireenko, E.G. 2003). The east-west dichotomy bison. Brest is also renowned as the site of sever- is also apparent in the more industrialized nature al major historical treaties and events (the Brest of the eastern regions (Ioffe, G. 2004, 2006) and Union of 1596, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk of 1918, the richer cultural and architectural heritage of the defence of the Brest Fortress in 1941, and the western areas with their more favourable demo- graphics. Nevertheless, these differences are far less profound than those seen in Ukraine. -
Sanctions Program: Belarus: Verordnung Vom 11. Dezember 2020 Über Massnahmen Gegenüber Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9), Anhang 1 Origin: EU Sanctions: Art
Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO Bilateral Economic Relations Sanctions Version of 07.07.2021 Sanctions program: Belarus: Verordnung vom 11. Dezember 2020 über Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9), Anhang 1 Origin: EU Sanctions: Art. 2 Abs. 1 (Finanzsanktionen) und Art. 3 Abs. 1 (Ein- und Durchreiseverbot) Sanctions program: Bélarus: Ordonnance du 11 décembre 2020 instituant des mesures à l’encontre du Bélarus (RS 946.231.116.9), annexe 1 Origin: EU Sanctions: art. 2, al. 1 (Sanctions financières) et art. 3, al. 1 (Interdiction de séjour et de transit) Sanctions program: Bielorussia: Ordinanza del 11 dicembre 2020 che istituisce provvedimenti nei confronti della Bielorussia (RS 946.231.116.9), allegato 1 Origin: EU Sanctions: art. 2 cpv. 1 (Sanzioni finanziarie) e art. 3 cpv. 1 (Divieto di entrata e di transito) Individuals SSID: 20-45419 Name: Buhuk Natallia Mikhailauna Spelling variant: a) БУГУК Наталля Мiхайлаўна (Belarusian) b) Buguk Natalia Mikhailovna (Russian) c) БУГУК Наталья Михайловна (Russian) Sex: W DOB: 19 Dec 1989 POB: Minsk, Belarus Nationality: Belarus Justification: In her position as judge at the Fruzensky district court in Minsk, Natallia Buhuk is responsible for numerous politically motivated rulings against journalists and protesters, in particular the sentencing of Katsiaryna Bakhvalava (Andreyeva) and Darya Chultsova. Violations of rights of defence and of right to a fair trial were reported during trials conducted under her supervision. She is therefore responsible for serious human rights violations and for seriously undermining the rule of law, as well as for the repression of civil society and democratic opposition. -
Mass Media in Belarus 2015 Annual Report
Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ) MASS MEDIA IN BELARUS 2015 ANNUAL REPORT Minsk 2016 CONTENTS SITUATION IN BELARUSIAN MASS MEDIA FIELD IN 2015 (Summary) ………………………………………………….....…. 3 MAIN EVENTS AND TRENDS IN BELARUSIAN MASS MEDIA FIELD IN 2015 ……………………………..……………….….… 4 CHANGES IN LEGISLATION …………………………………………… 9 VIOLATIONS OF THE RIGHTS OF MASS MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS, CONFLICTS IN THE SPHERE OF MASS-MEDIA ……………………………….................……...……....… 12 Court Cases (Except Administrative Prosecution) ………………..… 12 Detention of Journalists, Judicial Administrative Prosecution .... 13 Seizure of Equipment, Damages, Confiscation ……………………….. 21 Threats against Journalists ……………………......................................... 22 Warnings, Administrative Pressure ………….……………………………. 22 Violations Related to Access to Information ………………………… 25 Other Forms of Pressure and Violation of Journalists’ Rights … 29 Barriers to Printing or Distribution of Mass Media …………………. 31 Economic Policy for Mass Media ………………………........................... 32 Restrictions on the Free Use of the Web ………………………………. 33 Mass-media in Belarus: 2015 SITUATION IN BELARUSIAN MASS MEDIA FIELD IN 2015 (Summary) The Presidential election was the main factor that influenced the situation of mass media in Belarus in 2015. The election was held on October 11, 2015. On the eve of the Presidential election, the authorities introduced stricter norms into the media legislation and its application practice. Apparently, the decision was also grounded on the intention of Belarusian government to reinforce control over the media coverage of the gradually aggravating economic situation in the country. On January 1, 2015, new amendments into the Belarus law ‘On Mass Media’ came into force. They had been hastily adopted by the Belarusian legislators without any public discussion in December 2014. In particular, the amendments spread legal responsibility under the law on the Web media. -
The Meaning of the Centers for Pluralism for Belarus 39
36 Stojan Obradoviæ and Eric Chenoweth 37 Looking at the nearly ten years of NIJ’s existence, STINA is proud of its The Meaning of the Centers for achievements. Its work was not spectacular – we did not aim for splashy sto- ries. But it was significant and important. NIJ was alone in covering some of Pluralism for Belarus the key transition stories of this period, whether it was the prevalence of cor- ruption, the political uses of ethnic conflict and nationalism, the misuses of by Vincuk Viaèorka and Siarhiej Mackieviè privatization, or the ignored stories of civil society. Most importantly, the NIJ covered the development of democracy – and lack thereof – in the postcom- Vincuk Viaèorka is chairman of Belarus’ leading opposition party, the Belarus munist region. We brought to light the parties, individuals, and processes that Popular Front (BPF), which was founded in 1988. He is also the founder and for- many media ignored, but which proved to be among the most important mer chairman of the Belarus Center for Pluralism, the Civil Society Center- actors in the decade’s key democratic events. Supolnasc, a Center for Pluralism begun in 1996. Siarhiej Mackieviè is Supolnasc’s Today, due to sudden financial difficulties, the NIJ has had to suspend current chairman. He was chief of the National Headquarters of the non-partisan service temporarily. Nevertheless, it is planning further development and electoral mobilization campaign “Vybirai” (Choose) in 2001 and is vice chairman growth in the future. The goal of the Network of Independent Journalists is of the Assembly of Pro-Democratic NGOs. -
(CFSP) 2021/353 of 25 February 2021 Amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP Concerning Restrictive Measures Against Belarus
26.2.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union L 68/189 COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2021/353 of 25 February 2021 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Whereas: (1) On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against Belarus. (2) On the basis of a review of Decision 2012/642/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be extended until 28 February 2022. (3) The title of Decision 2012/642/CFSP, and the statements of reasons for nine natural and three legal persons included in the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures set out in the Annex to that Decision, should be amended. The date of listing for all natural persons included in that Annex should be added. (4) Decision 2012/642/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 Decision 2012/642/CFSP is amended as follows: (1) the title is replaced by the following: ‘Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus’; (2) Article 8 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 8 1. This Decision shall apply until 28 February 2022. 2. This Decision shall be kept under constant review and shall be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’; (3) the Annex is replaced by the Annex to this Decision. -
Belarus Page 1 of 9
Belarus Page 1 of 9 Belarus International Religious Freedom Report 2008 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides for freedom of religion; however, the Government restricted this right in practice. The Government continued to restrict religious freedom in accordance with the provisions of a 2002 law on religion and a 2003 concordat with the Belarusian Orthodox Church (BOC), a branch of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) and the only officially recognized Orthodox denomination. Although there is no state religion, the concordat grants the BOC privileged status. Protestants in particular attracted negative attention. Authorities kept many religious communities waiting as long as several years for decisions about registration or property restitution. Authorities harassed and fined members of certain religious groups, especially those regarded as bearers of foreign cultural influence or as having a political agenda. Foreign missionaries, clergy, and humanitarian workers affiliated with churches faced many government-imposed obstacles, including deportation and visa refusal or cancellation. Restrictions on foreign clergy increased during the reporting period. While some members of society took positive actions to promote religious freedom, instances of societal abuses and discrimination occurred, including numerous acts of vandalism and arson of religious sites, buildings, and memorials. The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom with the Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 80,154 square miles and a population of 9.7 million. Historically it has been an area of both interaction and conflict between Belarusian Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism, although relations between the two groups improved during the period covered by this report. -
No. Region Location Address of Automatic Deposit Machines the Bank’S Subdivision 1 Brest Brest, 11 Vorovskogo Str
No. Region Location address of automatic deposit machines The Bank’s subdivision 1 Brest Brest, 11 Vorovskogo Str. BSC1 No.116 in Brest, RD2 for Brest region 2 Brest region Bereza, 102 Lenina Str. BSC No.123 in Bereza, RD for Brest region 3 Brest region Kobrin, 23 Sovetskaya Str. BSC No.127 in Kobrin, RD for Brest region 4 Brest region Pinsk, 17 Zaslonova Str. BSC No.137 in Pinsk, RD for Brest region 5 Vitebsk Vitebsk, 31 Dimitrova Str. BSC No. 202 in Vitebsk, RD for Vitebsk region 6 Vitebsk region Glubokoye, 14, pl.17-e Sentyabra BSC No.239 in Glubokoye, RD for Vitebsk region 7 Vitebsk region Lepel, 74 Volodarskogo Str. BSC No.219 in Lepel, RD for Vitebsk region 8 Vitebsk region Orsha, 7 Lenina Str. BSC No.227 in Orsha, RD for Vitebsk region 9 Vitebsk region Polotsk, 8a F.Skaryny Ave. BSC No.232 in Polotsk, RD for Vitebsk region 10 Vitebsk region Postavy, 1A Yubileynaya Str. BSC No.217 in Postavy, RD for Vitebsk region 11 Gomel region Gomel, 30 Internatsionalnaya Str. BSC No.301 in Gomel, RD for Gomel region 12 Gomel region Kalinkovichi, 2A, 50 let Oktyabrya Str. BSC No.327 in Kalinkovitchi, RD for Gomel region 13 Gomel region Svetlogorsk, 41-2 Lenina Str. BSC No.321 in Svetlogorsk, RD for Gomel region 14 Gomel region Petrikov, 1 Kommunalnaya Str. BSC No.325 in Petrikov, RD for Gomel region 15 Grodno region Volkovysk, 6 Pervomaiskaya Str. BSC No.419 in Vokovysk, RD for Grodno region 16 Grodno region Smorgon, 25 Sovetskaya Str. -
(Land Plot) Slutsk
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Minsk Minsk - the Capital of the Republic of Belarus.................................................................................................................3 General...........................................................................................................................................................................................3 Investment Prospects...............................................................................................................................................................3 On Social and Economic Development of Minsk City over January-September, 2013 ...................................4 Industry of the City “Economy Modernization – Priority of Social Economic Development of Belarus”.........................................................................................................................................................8 Minsk Region Information on Minsk Region over January-July, 2013 General...........................................................................................................................................................................................9 Industry..........................................................................................................................................................................................9 Agriculture..................................................................................................................................................................................10 -
Минской Области of Minsk Region
ОХОТНИЧЬИ КОМПЛЕКСЫ МИНСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ HUNTING COMPLEXES OF MINSK REGION 60 MOLODECHNO 69 BORISOV 64 59 65 VOLOZIN 58 58 Березинский лесхоз 67, 68 Минский лесхоз Berezino Minsk forestry enterprise 61 67, 68 forestry enterprise 72 69 Молодеченский лесхоз MINSK 59 Борисовский опытный Molodechno forestry enterprise лесхоз 78 70 Пуховичский лесхоз 70 Borisov pilot Pukhovichi forestry enterprise forestry enterprise 71 Слуцкий лесхоз 60 Вилейский опытный лесхоз Slutsk forestry enterprise 76 77 Vileyka pilot 72 Смолевичский лесхоз forestry enterprise Smolevichi forestry enterprise 61 Воложинский лесхоз 73 Сторобинский лесхоз 63 74, 75 KLETSK Volozhin forestry enterprise Starobin forestry enterprise 71 62 Клецкий лесхоз 74, 75 Стародорожский 62 Kletsk forestry enterprise SLUTSK опытный лесхоз 63 Копыльский опытный лесхоз Starye Dorogi pilot 66 Kopyl pilot forestry enterprise 73 forestry enterprise 76 Столбцовский лесхоз 64 Крупский лесхоз Stolbtsy forestry enterprise Krupskiy forestry enterprise 77 Узденский лесхоз 65 Логойский лесхоз Uzda forestry enterprise В лесхозах области построен Logoysk forestry enterprise In the forestry area built 78 Червенский лесхоз 21 комфортабельный 66 Любанский лесхоз Cherven forestry enterprise охотничьий комплекс 21 comfortable Lyuban forestry enterprise hunting complexes нет лесоохотничьего хозяйства no forestry and hunting enterprises ÁÅÐÅÇÈÍÑÊÈÉ ëåñõîç ÂÎËÎÆÈÍÑÊÈÉ ëåñõîç forestry forestry BEREZINO enterprise VOLOZHIN enterprise г. Березино, ул. Пролетарская, 96 г. Воложин, ул. Садовая, 3 96 Proletarskaya str., 223311 Berezino 3 Sadovaya str., 222357 Volozhin Тел./tel.: +375 (1772) 5 57 72 Тел./tel.: +375 (1715) 5-10-28 - - E mail: [email protected] 58 E-mail: [email protected] - www.forestzone.by 61 www.volozhinles.by 53.909859, 28.854910 54.021257, 26.401551 ÊËÅÖÊÈÉ ëåñõîç forestry KLETSK enterprise г. -
Developing a National Strategy for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Peatlands in the Republic of Belarus
Developing a national strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of peatlands in the Republic of Belarus A. Kozulin1, N. Tanovitskaya2 and N. Minchenko3 1Scientific and Practical Centre for Biological Resources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus 2Institute for Nature Management, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus 3Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus _______________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY During most of the 20th century, peatlands in Belarus were regarded primarily as a strategic resource for agriculture and energy. In 1991, the Council of Ministers approved a “Scheme of Sustainable Use and Conservation of Peat Resources until 2010” (the “Scheme until 2010”) which allocated a considerable fraction of the country’s mires to nature conservation. Expiry of that Scheme has prompted its replacement with the “National Strategy for the Conservation and Wise (Sustainable) Use of Peatlands in the Republic of Belarus” (the “Strategy”) supported by a new “Scheme until 2030”. The aim is to meet the requirements for both sustainable development of natural resources within Belarus and international conventions. This article describes the development of the Strategy, which was achieved in conjunction with a detailed appraisal of the current state of peatlands in Belarus. The outcome is that the “Scheme until 2030” allocates almost all of the mires that have so far been confirmed still to be in natural (pristine) condition (684,200 ha or 29 % of the total peatland area) to nature conservation, 19,600 ha (1 %) as a reserve of ‘especially valuable’ peat, 99,100 ha (4 %) for commercial peat extraction, and 1,592,600 ha (66 %) for agriculture and forestry.