The Public Sphere and Jamaican Anticolonial Politics: Public Opinion, Focus, and the Place of the Literary
The Public Sphere and Jamaican Anticolonial Politics: Public Opinion, Focus, and the Place of the Literary Raphael Dalleo Small Axe, Number 32 (Volume 14, Number 2), June 2010, pp. 56-82 (Article) Published by Duke University Press For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/smx/summary/v014/14.2.dalleo.html Access Provided by Florida Atlantic University at 07/19/10 5:34PM GMT The Public Sphere and Jamaican Anticolonial Politics: Public Opinion, Focus, and the Place of the Literary Raphael Dalleo The 1930s and 1940s are pivotal to accounts of the history of anticolonial nationalism through- out the Caribbean, and especially in Jamaica. It has become commonplace to acknowledge that alongside the development of a powerful labor movement and the nation’s two major political parties, Jamaica’s literature also came into its own during this period. An image from Drumblair, the memoir of Norman and Edna Manley’s granddaughter Rachel, captures the most idealized sense of the complementarity between literature and politics within the antico- lonial movement: “In addition to the party executive, the Focus group was meeting from time to time to work on the third edition. It seemed quite natural to me that the progress towards nationhood should be made culturally in one room and politically in another.”1 Norman, the lawyer turned nationalist politician, and Edna, the sculptor and literary intellectual, are shown working in different rooms, although Rachel notes that in 1955, on the eve of Norman’s elec- tion, the “groups had merged, and they were all coming and going in each other’s times and voicing opinions on each other’s subjects.
[Show full text]