DOCSLIB.ORG

Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Corporate Social Responsibility

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Corporate Social Responsibility Laporan Kepada Tinjauan Pendahuluan Pemegang Saham dan Profil Perusahaan Introduction Pemangku Kepentingan Company Profile Pendukung Bisnis Report to Shareholders Business Support Review and Stakeholders 07 Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Corporate Social Responsibility 556 Laporan Tahunan 2017 Annual Report | PT GMF AeroAsia Tbk. Analisis dan Tanggung Jawab Laporan Keuangan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Pembahasan Manajemen Sosial Perusahaan Audited 2017 Analysis and Management Corporate Governance Corporate Social Responsibility Audited Financial Discussion Report 2017 Laporan Tahunan 2017 Annual Report | PT GMF AeroAsia Tbk. 557 Laporan Kepada Tinjauan Pendahuluan Pemegang Saham dan Profil Perusahaan Introduction Pemangku Kepentingan Company Profile Pendukung Bisnis Report to Shareholders Business Support Review and Stakeholders Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Corporate Social Responsibility Menjadi perusahaan terbuka turut mendorong GMF untuk meningkatkan kinerja keberlanjutannya lebih jauh pada aspek lingkungan, ekonomi, dan sosial. Hal ini merupakan salah satu perwujudan GMF untuk menjaga kepercayaan publik. GMF berkomitmen untuk terus tumbuh dan berkembang bersama masyarakat sekitar, membangun hubungan yang harmonis di tengah-tengah lingkungan yang lestari dan dapat memberi manfaat seluas-luasnya untuk memenuhi harapan para pemangku kepentingan. Being a public company has encouraged GMF to further increase its performance of sustainability in the sectors of environment, economy, and social. It is part of the GMF’s goals to keep the public trust. GMF is committed to continually growing together with the people living around, developing harmonious relationships within sustainable environment and benefit the society as much as possible as expected by all stakeholders. 558 Laporan Tahunan 2017 Annual Report | PT GMF AeroAsia Tbk. Analisis dan Tanggung Jawab Laporan Keuangan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Pembahasan Manajemen Sosial Perusahaan Audited 2017 Analysis and Management Corporate Governance Corporate Social Responsibility Audited Financial Discussion Report 2017 Pendahuluan Introduction Menjadi perusahaan terbuka di tahun 2017 ini, menuntut GMF Becoming a publicly listed company in 2017 has demanded untuk senantiasa menjaga kepercayaan publik yang merupakan GMF to continually keep the public trust, which is the basic modal dasar untuk terus tumbuh dan mendapatkan citra capital for the company to be continually growing and getting positif di masyarakat. GMF melihat bahwa pertumbuhan positive image among the public. For GMF, the sustainable yang berkelanjutan tidak hanya ditujukan untuk perusahaan growth is not only for the sake of the company alone, but saja tetapi juga harus berjalan bersamaan dengan masyarakat also for the interest of the people and environment around its dan lingkungan di sekitar daerah operasinya. Untuk itu, GMF business operations. To realize it, GMF is not only committed to berkomitmen untuk tidak hanya melaksanakan pengelolaan implementing its business operations based on best practices kegiatan usahanya berdasarkan tata kelola dan praktik terbaik, of governance, but also to improving its performance of namun juga meningkatkan kinerja keberlanjutannya lebih jauh sustainability further in the sectors of environment, economy, pada aspek lingkungan, ekonomi dan sosial. and social. Dalam rangka merealisasikan visi Perusahaan menjadi Top Ten To realize its mission of becoming Top Ten MRO’s in The World, MRO’s in The World, GMF terus menjalankan komitmennya GMF has been continually realizing its commitment to give untuk berkontribusi dalam pembangunan berkelanjutan, contributions on sustainable development, create a harmony menciptakan harmoni dengan komunitas lokal dan with local community, the general public, and the stakeholders masyarakat umum serta pemangku kepentingan dalam rangka with a view to improving the life quality of the meningkatkan kualitas kehidupan masyarakat Indonesia yang Indonesian people. lebih baik. Melalui berbagai aktivitas CSR yang secara konsisten telah Through various programs of corporate social responsibility dilakukan, Perusahaan berharap dapat memberikan kontribusi (CSR), which has been consistently implemented, the company nyata terhadap pembangunan berkelanjutan, memberikan hopes to give real contributions for sustainable development, dukungan terhadap keberhasilan bisnis secara jangka give supports for the success of business in the long term, and panjang, dan memenuhi harapan para stakeholders terhadap meet the expectation of stakeholders for the company. Perusahaan. Sebagai bentuk keterbukaan informasi terhadap program For information transparency on its CSR programs, the CSR, Perusahaan sejak tahun 2014 telah menyusun company has since 2014 compiled its sustainability reports Laporan Keberlanjutan Perusahaan Tahun 2017 dan and Published them through its website. The sustainability mempublikasikannya secara terbuka di website Perusahaan. reports are periodic reports, which reveal its performances in Laporan Keberlanjutan ini merupakan laporan berkala maintaining sustainability in the sectors of economy, social, yang mengungkapkan kinerja keberlanjutan Perusahaan and environment based on the Sustainability Reporting dalam melaporkan kinerja ekonomi, sosial, dan lingkungan Guidelines. Perusahaan yang disusun dengan mengacu pada Pedoman Pelaporan Keberlanjutan (Sustainability Reporting Guidelines). Fokus Laporan ini adalah pada beberapa aspek keberlanjutan The focus of the report is on several aspects of main utama yang ditentukan berdasarkan analisis materialitas sustainability, which is determined based on analysis of dan relevansinya dengan aktivitas bisnis Perusahaan. Proses materiality and its relevance to the company’s business penentuan aspek material yang terdapat dalam Laporan ini activities. The process of determining the material aspect in dilakukan berdasarkan analisis keberlanjutan bisnis Perusahaan the report is based on the analysis of the company’s business serta survei dan pembahasan eksternal guna menghasilkan sustainability and survey as well as external discussions to get informasi yang relevan sesuai dengan kebutuhan para relevant information according to the need of stakeholders. Laporan Tahunan 2017 Annual Report | PT GMF AeroAsia Tbk. 559 Laporan Kepada Tinjauan Pendahuluan Pemegang Saham dan Profil Perusahaan Introduction Pemangku Kepentingan Company Profile Pendukung Bisnis Report to Shareholders Business Support Review and Stakeholders Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Corporate Social Responsibility pemangku kepentingan. Aspek dan indikator kinerja material The aspect and indicator of material performance as the focus yang menjadi fokus dan prioritas dalam Laporan ini didasarkan and priority of the report is based on the discussions and atas hasil diskusi dan penilaian Perusahaan dan para pemangku evaluations of the company, and all stakeholders. kepentingan. Visi dan Misi CSR Perusahaan The Company’s CSR Vision and Mission Bentuk komitmen GMF terhadap Tanggung Jawab Sosial The commitment of GMF for the corporate social responsibility Perusahaan tertuang dalam Visi, Misi dan Tujuan program CSR (CR) is contained in its vision, mission, and goals of the Perusahaan sebagai berikut: company’s CSR programs as follows: Visi Vision Mewujudkan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan yang berkelanjutan untuk menuju Top Ten MROs in the World. Realizing sustainable corporate social responsibility to the Top Ten MROs in the World. Misi Mission Menjalankan program CSR yang mampu memberikan dampak yang berkelanjutan kepada stakeholders sesuai dengan standar international (ISO 26000). Implementing CSR programs that are able to bring sustainable impacts to stakeholders based on international standard (ISO 26000). 560 Laporan Tahunan 2017 Annual Report | PT GMF AeroAsia Tbk. Analisis dan Tanggung Jawab Laporan Keuangan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Pembahasan Manajemen Sosial Perusahaan Audited 2017 Analysis and Management Corporate Governance Corporate Social Responsibility Audited Financial Discussion Report 2017 Tujuan Goal Tujuan pelaksanaan CSR adalah untuk membina hubungan, baik kepada pihak internal maupun eksternal, guna mewujudkan keberlanjutan bisnis perusahaan. CSR eksternal bertujuan untuk mendukung Pemerintah dalam membantu pencapaian tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan melalui implementasi program CSR. Sedangkan CSR internal bertujuan untuk membangun hubungan yang harmonis dan kondusif dengan seluruh stakeholders dalam rangka mendukung pencapaian visi dan misi Perusahaan, yang pada akhirnya akan meningkatkan reputasi dan kredibilitas Perusahaan. The goal of implementing CSR is to build relationships, internally and externally, to realize sustainability of company’s business and external CSR is aimed to support the government in assisting the realization of sustainable development through the implementation of CSR programs. Internal CSR is aimed to build a harmonious and conducive relationship with all stakeholders with a view to realizing the vision and mission of the company, which then will increase its reputation and credibility of the company. Laporan Tahunan 2017 Annual Report | PT GMF AeroAsia Tbk. 561 Laporan Kepada Tinjauan Pendahuluan Pemegang Saham dan Profil Perusahaan Introduction Pemangku Kepentingan Company Profile Pendukung Bisnis Report to Shareholders Business Support Review and Stakeholders Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Corporate Social Responsibility Landasan Penerapan CSR CSR Implementation Bases Program CSR merupakan program strategis perusahaan,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bab Iii Analisis Deskriptif 3.1 Data Umum 3.1.1 Sejarah Pt
    BAB III ANALISIS DESKRIPTIF 3.1 DATA UMUM 3.1.1 SEJARAH PT GAPURA ANGKASA Tuntutan kegiatan operasional pada dunia kedirgantaraan yang mengharuskan maskapai penerbangan agar dapat memberikan pelayanan operasional secara cepat, tepat, dan akurat tanpa mengabaikan prosedur keselamatan semakin jelas terlihat pada era modern seperti sekarang ini. Demikian juga yang dirasakan oleh PT Garuda Indonesia selaku maskapai penerbangan nasional milik Republik Indonesia, dimana selama ini maskapai tersebut menangani secara tunggal proses operasional kegiatan penerbangan yang ada yakni mulai dari keberangkatan pesawat (pre flight) hingga kedatangan pesawat (post flight) tanpa adanya keterlibatan pihak perantara yang bertindak sebagai jasa penunjang pelayanan kegiatan operasional darat (ground handling). Atas dasar hal tersebutlah mengapa kemudian PT Gapura Angkasa selaku perusahaan ground handling yang menangani secara khusus maskapai penerbangan Garuda Indonesia didirikan. PT Gapura Angkasa sendiri berdiri pada tanggal 26 Januari 1998 dengan nama perusahaan pada saat awal berdiri yakni Gapura, dimana dalam pendiriannya perusahaan ini di modali oleh tiga perusahaan BUMN yakni PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, PT Angkasa Pura I (Persero), serta PT Angkasa Pura II (Persero). Kerjasama antara ketiga perusahaan milik negara tersebut mengacu pada Keputusan Menteri Keuangan dengan Nomor SR 04/MK/016/1996 dan juga 23 akta no.32 tanggal 26 Januari tahun 1998. Identitas PT Gapura Angkasa sebagai perusahaan ground handling bagi maskapai penerbangan nasional nomor wahid tersebut juga dipertegas dengan mayoritas kepemilikan saham PT Garuda Indonesia di PT Gapura Angkasa yang jumlahnya mencapai 1.263.360 (Satu Juta Dua Ratus Enam Puluh Tiga Ribu Tiga Ratus Enam Puluh) atau dengan prosentase saham persero sebesar 58,75 % mulai tanggal 9 Desember 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty
    RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty ‐ Ninth Regional Aviation Safety Group — Pan America Executive Steering Committee Meeting (RASG‐PA ESC/29) ICAO NACC Regional Office, Mexico City, Mexico, 29‐30 November 2017 Agenda Item 3: Items/Briefings of interest to the RASG‐PA ESC PROPOSAL TO AMEND ICAO FLIGHT DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMME (FDAP) RECOMMENDATION AND STANDARD TO EXPAND AEROPLANES´ WEIGHT THRESHOLD (Presented by Flight Safety Foundation and supported by Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Flight Data Analysis Program (FDAP) working group comprised by representatives of Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP, is in the process of preparing a proposal to expand the number of functional flight data analysis programs. It is anticipated that a greater number of Flight Data Analysis Programs will lead to significantly greater safety levels through analysis of critical event sets and incidents. Action: The FDAP working group is requesting support for greater implementation of FDAP/FDMP throughout the Pan American Regions and consideration of new ICAO standards through the actions outlined in Section 4 of this working paper. Strategic Safety Objectives: References: Annex 6 ‐ Operation of Aircraft, Part 1 sections as mentioned in this working paper RASG‐PA ESC/28 ‐ WP/09 presented at the ICAO SAM Regional Office, 4 to 5 May 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1 Flight Data Recorders have long been used as one of the most important tools for accident investigations such that the term “black box” and its recovery is well known beyond the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • PENGARUH BANDAR UDARA INTERNASIONAL SULTAN HASANUDDIN TERHADAP PENGEMBANGAN SPASIAL DI SEKITARNYA (Studi Kasus : Kelurahan Sudia
    PENGARUH BANDAR UDARA INTERNASIONAL SULTAN HASANUDDIN TERHADAP PENGEMBANGAN SPASIAL DI SEKITARNYA (Studi Kasus : Kelurahan Sudiang Kecamatan Biringkanaya Kota Makassar) Skripsi Diajukan untuk Memenuhi Salah Satu Syarat Meraih Gelar Sarjana Teknik Jurusan Teknik Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota pada Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi UIN Alauddin Makassar Oleh : KHAERUNNISA NIM : 60800112110 JURUSAN TEKNIK PERENCANAAN WILAYAH DAN KOTA FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI UIN ALAUDDIN MAKASSAR 2017 v KATA PENGANTAR Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh Puji syukur terpanjatkan kepada Rabb sekalian alam, Allah Subhana wa Ta’ala karena atas limpahan berkah, rahmat, hidayah, dan keilmuan yang dicurahkanNya sehingga skripsi dengan judul “Pengaruh Bandar Udara Internasional Sultan Hasanuddin Terhadap Pengembangan Spasial di Sekitarnya (Studi Kasus Kelurahan Sudiang Kecamatan Biringkanaya Kota Makassar)” dapat terselesaikan sebagai salah satu syarat untuk mencapai gelar Sarjana Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota (S.P.W.K) pada Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar. Salam dan Shalawat senantiasa tercurah kepada rahmatan lil alamin baginda Rasulullah Muhammad saw. yang telah berjuang menyempurnakan akhlak manusia di atas bumi ini. Penyusunan skripsi ini, penulis telah banyak mendapatkan dukungan, bimbingan dan bantuan sehingga segala hambatan dan tantangan dapat penulis hadapi dengan penuh keikhlasan. Olehnya itu, perkenankanlah penulis mengucapkan terima kasih yang sebesar-besarnya kepada kedua orang tua tercinta, Ayahanda Ir. H. Kamaruddin, M.M. dan Ibunda Hj. Suswati yang telah memberikan curahan kasih sayang, motivasi, materi dan doa yang tak ternilai harganya. vi Terselesaikannya penyusunan dan penulisan skripsi ini tidak lepas pula dari bantuan berbagai pihak sehingga penulis merasa patut menghaturkan terima kasih yang sebesar-besarnya kepada semua pihak yang berjasa, khususnya kepada: 1. Bapak Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Update Sd 30 Juni 2019
    STATUS REKOMENDASI KECELAKAAN PENERBANGAN (RECOMMENDATION STATUS OF AVIATION OCCURRENCES) 2015 - 2019 ( Update s.d 30 Juni 2019) REGISTRASI PESAWAT TANGGAL NO TANGGAL INVESTIGASI INSTANSI PENERIMA TANGGAL DITERIMA (RESPONSE NO (AIRCRAFT KEJADIAN (DATE SUMBER (SOURCE) DIKELUARKAN NO RECOMMENDATION REKOMENDASI (RECOMMENDATION) KEYWORD STATUS TANGGAPAN (RESPONSE) KATEGORI (CLASSIFICATION) (INVESTIGATION) (ADDRESS TO) DATE) REGISTRATION) OF OCCURRENCE) (DATE OF ISSUED) KNKT.15.02.04.04 - PT. Garuda Indonesia Refer to analysis chapter 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 of this report, the KNKT recommends ATR 72‐600; PK‐GAG Directorate General that DGCA should oversight the implementation of recommendation addressed Lombok International PK-GAG 3-Feb-2015 2015 Final Report 9-Dec-2016 of Civil Aviation 04 R 2016 4 1 to the air OPEN NIL PENGAWASAN Airport (DGCA) operator, to ensure the effectiveness ofthe operators safety improvement and Republic of Indonesia to facilitate the recommendation addressed to airport operator. 03 February 2015 KNKT.15.02.04.04 - PT. Garuda Indonesia ATR 72‐600; PK‐GAG The handling of the aircraft was contrary to the wind condition. The KNKT Lombok International PK-GAG 3-Feb-2015 2015 Final Report 9-Dec-2016 Garuda Indonesia 04 O 2016 4 1 OPEN NIL ATURAN recommends that the operator shall emphasized the crosswind handling. Airport Republic of Indonesia 03 February 2015 1 KNKT.15.02.04.04 - PT. In the preliminary report of this investigation, KNKT issued recommendation Garuda Indonesia related to standard call out on final. In addition, investigation identified two ATR 72‐600; PK‐GAG change over control of the flight at critical phase of flight without clear Lombok International PK-GAG 3-Feb-2015 2015 Final Report 9-Dec-2016 Garuda Indonesia 04 O 2016 4 2 OPEN NIL PENGAWASAN statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Profil Asosiasi
    PROFIL ASOSIASI NOPEMBER 2019 ISI DASAR HUKUM VISI & MISI STRUKTUR ORGANISASI UMUM JUMLAH & PERAN ANGGOTA PROGRAM KERJA ASOSIASI EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES ANNUAL GENERAL MEETINGS DASAR HUKUM DAN REFERENSI KEPUTUSAN MENTERI PERHUBUNGAN NOMOR : KP / 5 / AU 701 / PHB – 89 TENTANG ASOSIASI PENERBANGAN NASIONAL ATAU INDONESIA NATIONAL AIR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION TANGGAL 23 NOPEMBER 1989 AKTE NOTARIS TITIEK IRAWATI S.S.H. , PERIHAL AKTA : PERNYATAAN KEPUTUSAN RAPAT TENTANG ANGGARAN DASAR ASOSIASI PERUSAHAAN PENERBANGAN NASIONAL ATAU DISEBUT INDONESIA NATIONAL AIR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION (INACA) NO.: 8.- TAHUN 2000 (lihat akte 15 feb 2010) pasal 10) AKTE NOTARIS TITIEK IRAWATI S.S.H. , PERIHAL AKTA : PERNYATAAN KEPUTUSAN RAPAT TENTANG ANGGARAN DASAR ASOSIASI PERUSAHAAN PENERBANGAN NASIONAL ATAU DISEBUT INDONESIA NATIONAL AIR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION (INACA) NO.: 42.- TANGGAL 15 JUNI 2006 AKTE NOTARIS TITIEK IRAWATI S.S.H. , PERIHAL AKTA : PERNYATAAN KEPUTUSAN RAPAT TENTANG ANGGARAN DASAR ASOSIASI PERUSAHAAN PENERBANGAN NASIONAL ATAU DISEBUT INDONESIA NATIONAL AIR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION (INACA) NO.: 69.- TANGGAL 15 FEBRUARI 2010 AKTE NOTARIS TITIEK IRAWATI S.S.H. , PERIHAL AKTA : PERNYATAAN KEPUTUSAN RAPAT TENTANG ANGGARAN DASAR ASOSIASI PERUSAHAAN PENERBANGAN NASIONAL ATAU DISEBUT INDONESIA NATIONAL AIR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION (INACA) NO.: 44.- TANGGAL 28 SEPTEMBER 2010 AKTE NOTARIS TITIEK IRAWATI S.S.H. , PERIHAL AKTA : PERNYATAAN KEPUTUSAN RAPAT TENTANG ANGGARAN DASAR ASOSIASI PERUSAHAAN PENERBANGAN NASIONAL ATAU DISEBUT INDONESIA NATIONAL AIR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION
    [Show full text]
  • Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
    World airliner census Western-built jet and turboprop airliners AEROSPATIALE (NORD) 262 7 Lufthansa (600R) 2 Biman Bangladesh Airlines (300) 4 Tarom (300) 2 Africa 3 MNG Airlines (B4) 2 China Eastern Airlines (200) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (200) 1 Equatorial Int’l Airlines (A) 1 MNG Airlines (B4 Freighter) 5 Emirates (300) 1 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300) 5 Int’l Trans Air Business (A) 1 MNG Airlines (F4) 3 Emirates (300F) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300F) 1 Trans Service Airlift (B) 1 Monarch Airlines (600R) 4 Iran Air (200) 6 Uzbekistan Airways (300) 3 North/South America 4 Olympic Airlines (600R) 1 Iran Air (300) 2 White (300) 1 Aerolineas Sosa (A) 3 Onur Air (600R) 6 Iraqi Airways (300) (5) North/South America 81 RACSA (A) 1 Onur Air (B2) 1 Jordan Aviation (200) 1 Aerolineas Argentinas (300) 2 AEROSPATIALE (SUD) CARAVELLE 2 Onur Air (B4) 5 Jordan Aviation (300) 1 Air Transat (300) 11 Europe 2 Pan Air (B4 Freighter) 2 Kuwait Airways (300) 4 FedEx Express (200F) 49 WaltAir (10B) 1 Saga Airlines (B2) 1 Mahan Air (300) 2 FedEx Express (300) 7 WaltAir (11R) 1 TNT Airways (B4 Freighter) 4 Miat Mongolian Airlines (300) 1 FedEx Express (300F) 12 AIRBUS A300 408 (8) North/South America 166 (7) Pakistan Int’l Airlines (300) 12 AIRBUS A318-100 30 (48) Africa 14 Aero Union (B4 Freighter) 4 Royal Jordanian (300) 4 Europe 13 (9) Egyptair (600R) 1 American Airlines (600R) 34 Royal Jordanian (300F) 2 Air France 13 (5) Egyptair (600R Freighter) 1 ASTAR Air Cargo (B4 Freighter) 6 Yemenia (300) 4 Tarom (4) Egyptair (B4 Freighter) 2 Express.net Airlines
    [Show full text]
  • Gapura Annual Report 2017
    2017 Laporan Tahunan Annual Report PERFORMANCE THROUGH SERVICE & OPERATIONS EXCELLENCE DAFTAR ISI Table of Contents PERFORMANCE THROUGH SERVICE & PEMBAHASAN DAN ANALISA MANAJEMEN OPERATIONS EXCELLENCE 1 Management Discussion & Analysis 56 Tinjauan Bisnis dan Operasional IKHTISAR 2017 Business & Operational Review 58 2017 Highlights 2 Tinjauan Pendukung Bisnis Business Support Review 64 Kinerja 2017 Tinjauan Keuangan 2017 Performance 2 Financial Review 80 Ikhtisar Keuangan Financial Highlights 4 TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN LAPORAN MANAJEMEN Corporate Governance 92 Management Report 6 Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham General Shareholders Meeting 103 Laporan Dewan Komisaris Dewan Komisaris Report from the Board of Commissioners 8 Board of Commissioners 104 Laporan Direksi Direksi Report from the Board of Directors 14 Board of Directors 109 Komite Audit PROFIL PERUSAHAAN Audit Committee 119 Company Profile 22 Sekretaris Perusahaan Identitas Perusahaan Corporate Secretary 121 Company Identity 24 Manajemen Risiko Sekilas Gapura Risk Management 126 Gapura in Brief 26 Kode Etik Perusahaan Visi dan Misi Company Code of Conduct 130 Vision & Mission 28 Komposisi Pemegang Saham TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN Shareholders Composition 30 Corporate Social Responsibility 136 Jejak Langkah Milestones 32 Bidang Usaha LAPORAN KEUANGAN Field of Business 36 Financial Statements 153 Produk dan Jasa Products & Services 38 DATA PERUSAHAAN Wilayah Operasi Corporate Data 207 Operational Area 40 Pertumbuhan GSE 2014-2018 Struktur Organisasi GSE Growth 2014-2018 208 Organizational
    [Show full text]
  • INACA Annual Report 2018 1 Annual General Meeting 2018
    INACA Annual Report 2018 1 Annual General Meeting 2018 RUA (Rapat Umum Anggota) INACA tahun 2018 telah diselenggarakan di Jakarta pada 25 Oktober 2018. The 2018 INACA RUA (Annual General Meeting) was held in Jakarta on October 25, 2018. 2 INACA Annual Report 2018 INACA Annual Report 2018 3 Dari Sekretaris Jenderal From the Secretary General Menjelang tutup tahun 2018, in- dustri penerbangan nasional dih- Towards the end of 2018, the national aviation industry adapkan de ngan public issue yang was confronted with a public issue which was quite cukup menghebohkan untuk tidak horrendous not to say troublesome, namely regarding the mengatakan merepotkan, yaitu selling price of domestic flight tickets. Internally, INACA perihal harga jual tiket penerban- and members spent attention continuously to look for gan dalam negeri. Secara internal ways to weather the storm as the ticket prices are seen INACA bersama anggota terus men- as expensive and are associated with the risk of negative cari jalan-jalan tengah berhubung impacts on community economic activities, and externally, harga jual tiket dipandang mahal INACA as the only aviation industry organization in the dan dikaitkan dengan risiko dampak country, deal with it as wisely as possible considering that negative terhadap kegiatan ekonomi masyarakat, dan se- the issue involved the government as a regulator, mem- cara eksternal INACA sebagai satu-satunya organisasi in- bers of INACA as operators and media as well as the public dustri penerbangan di negeri ini, menghadapinya dengan as consumers. sebijaksana mungkin meng ingat terlibat di situ pemerintah Aviation industry activities generally run well and the sebagai regulator, anggota INACA sebagai operator dan me- dia serta masyarakat sebagai konsumen.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Hasanuddin Law Review Vol. 2 Issue 3, December (2016) Volume 2 Issue 3, December 2016: pp. 328-348. Copyright © 2015- 2016 HALREV. Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. ISSN: 2442-9880 | e-ISSN: 2442-9899. HALREV Open Access at: http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev Hasanuddin Law Review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Improving Aviation Safety in Indonesia: How Many More Accidents? Ridha Aditya Nugraha German Aviation Research Society, Berlin, Germany; Air Power Centre of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: Sep 15, 2016; Reviewed: Nov 21, 2016; Accepted: Dec 4, 2016 Abstract: Numerous and consecutive aircraft accidents combined with a consistent failure to meet international safety standards in Indonesia, namely from the International Civil Aviation Organization and the European Aviation Safety Agency have proven a nightmare for the country’s aviation safety reputation. There is an urgent need for bureaucracy reform, harmonization of legislation, and especially ensuring legal enforcement, to bring Indonesian aviation safety back to world standards. The Indonesian Aviation Law of 2009 was enacted to reform the situation in Indonesia. The law has become the ground for drafting legal framework under decrees of the Minister of Transportation, which have allowed the government to perform follow-up actions such as establishing a single air navigation service provider and guaranteeing the independency of the Indonesian National Transportation Safety Committee. A comparison with Thailand is made to enrich the perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • RASMAG/21−WP25 14-17/06/2016 International Civil Aviation Organization the Twenty-First Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safet
    RASMAG/21−WP25 14-17/06/2016 International Civil Aviation Organization The Twenty-First Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group (RASMAG/21) Bangkok, Thailand, 14-17 June 2016 Agenda Item 5: Airspace Safety Monitoring Activities/Requirements in Asia/Pacific Region ESTIMATE OF RVSM LONG TERM HEIGHT MONITORING BURDEN FOR THE AUSTRALIAN AIRSPACE MONITORING AGENCY (AAMA) (Presented by Australia) SUMMARY This paper presents the current monitoring burden for aircraft registered and operated by Australia, Indonesia, the Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea to meet Annex 6 requirements. 1. Introduction 1.1. The Long Term Height Monitoring Impact Statement developed by RASMAG was endorsed by APANPIRG/20 in September 2009. That statement included a determination by each of the Asia/Pacific Regional Monitoring Agencies (RMAs) of the anticipated monitoring burden for each State within the region. RASMAG/12 tasked the RMAs to review and update that data and subsequent meetings have seen RMAs report accordingly. The Australian Airspace Monitoring Agency (AAMA) last provided anticipated monitoring burden data at RASMAG/20. This current paper provides an update to that data. 2. Discussion 2.1 The AAMA has previously supplied data on its anticipated monitoring burden following the implementation of long term height monitoring in November 2010. The data was based on a review of the current RVSM approvals data for the State airspaces that the AAMA is responsible for, taking into account completed successful monitoring activity. 2.2 A review of the most recent RVSM approvals databases maintained by the AAMA on behalf of ICAO determined that the total number of RVSM approved aircraft totalled 1135 as at 8 June 2016.
    [Show full text]