A Nation of Joiners. Volunteer Firefighters and Slovenian Nation- and State-Building from Below

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Nation of Joiners. Volunteer Firefighters and Slovenian Nation- and State-Building from Below Südosteuropa 68 (2020), no. 2, pp. 148–175 VOLUNTEERING AND VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS ANA KLADNIK A Nation of Joiners. Volunteer Firefighters and Slovenian Nation‑ and State‑Building from Below Abstract. Challenging the received view that the Western world is the authentic cradle of associations, with the United States often epitomised as the ‘nation of joiners’, this article interprets voluntary associations in East Central Europe (ECE) as variations from the West‑ ern model. New studies on associational life in ECE suggest that well-established theoretical dichotomies like state-non-state or governmental-civil need to be overcome and argue that voluntary associations always actively interacted with the political context and contributed to shaping it. The article revisits these theses by focusing on the role of volunteer fire de‑ partments, which in ECE have existed almost uninterruptedly since the mid-19th century. It focuses on the period of double transition in Slovenia around 1990—to a democratic system and to an independent Slovenian state—and argues that the volunteer firefighters were able to negotiate the inevitable changes also because they were recognised as associations of Slo‑ vene national substance. Ana Kladnik is a Research Associate at the Institute of Contemporary History in Ljubljana. Introduction In 2018, during a research stay in Slovenia, I met with a volunteer firefighter from a small municipality in the eastern part of the country. In the mid-1970s, as a young boy, he had joined the volunteer firefighting department (VFD) in his village. This VFD was founded in 1951, based on the idea and experience of a man from a neighbouring village which already had a four-decade-old VFD, and with the help of a group of men, among them my interlocutor’s father and uncle. His VFD remains very active to this day: my interlocutor’s wife has been a member since her childhood, and they were joined in recent years by their two sons. During our meeting, I asked him about the development of volunteer firefighting during the political transition: ‘“Transition?”, he asked, “This is the period around ’91, right? Hard years, yes. In any case, this was progress for the firefighting department in my opinion. The transition in Slovenia was, thank God, in the right direction. So, to keep volunteering […] we solved the firefighting story, precisely because of that.” Volunteer Firefighters and Slovenian Nation- and State-Building from Below 149 “I wonder, if there are not too many [volunteer firefighting] departments?”, I re‑ plied. “Well”, he said, “if I looked at the rules, both commercially and economically, I would agree that there are municipalities where there are too many of them. I speak for my own municipality […] of 3,600 people, and five departments. It’s too many, yes. But there is no one with the courage to say ‘we are going to close one’. Who would say such a thing? The mayor? No. This is his electorate, right? What can you do—just leave it. You buy another fire truck, and have no worries for the next hun‑ dred years.”’1 This is a glimpse into my conversation with a member of one of the oldest and most popular organisations in Slovenia, the Firefighting Association of Slovenia (Gasilska Zveza Slovenije, GZS), which in 2018 had 120 regional asso‑ ciations, 1,299 VFDs, and more than 162,500 members. Today, membership in Slovenia’s volunteer fire departments amounts to around 7.7 % of the pop‑ ulation, compared to around 4 % in Austria and the Czech Republic, around 3 % in Croatia, and 1.7 % in Germany. These numbers represent operative fire‑ fighters between 18 years of age and around 63 for men and 50 for women, children and youth aged 7 to 18, as well as firefighting veterans, i. e. long-time members of a VFD older than 63 years (men) or 50 (women). The figures also include supporting members, who for example help to raise funds, to organise firefighting events, or to maintain museum collections. The percentage is cal‑ culated on the basis of the number of volunteer firefighters registered by the national firefighting associations and in national statistics, and the population of the country according to the country’s Bureau of Statistics.2 According to information published on its website, the GZS defines itself as ‘independent, nonprofit, humanitarian, non-political and connecting voluntary fire departments and their [regional, A. K.] associations at the highest level. It operates on the basis of the Associations Act and the Firefighting Act. […] It was founded in 1949 in Ljubljana as the successor to all previous firefighting organisations.’3 I am extremely grateful to both anonymous reviewers and Sabine Rutar for their criticism and suggestions that considerably improved my arguments in this paper. My sincere thanks go to Karin Taylor for language editing. 1 Interview with G. Z., 27 July 2018. 2 Poročilo Upravnega odbora XVII. kongresa GZS, Ptuj, 18-19 May 2018, http://www. gasilec.net/uploads/datoteke/Priloga%20porocilo%20Janko%20Cerkvenik.pdf, 4. The mem‑ bership data also includes the volunteer firefighters in the so-called volunteer industrial fire departments (VIFD), a total of forty-two. Although the VIFDs deserve detailed research, in this study I concentrate on territorial, local VFDs. All internet references were accessed on 26 June 2020. 3 Gasilska zveza Slovenije, Portal slovenskih prostovoljnih gasilcev, http://www.gasilec. net/organizacija/kongresi‑plenumi. On the local level, the VFDs operate as a local public firefighting service, whose functioning is ensured by the municipality and the state. The exact rights and duties of the members are defined in the statute of each VFD separately. 150 Ana Kladnik My conversation with the volunteer firefighter, firstly, points to the ever-pres‑ ent intention of volunteer firefighters to expand their association and, secondly, illustrates the relationship between the volunteer firefighters and (local) au‑ thorities. It thereby alludes to the focus of this article: in the following, I demon‑ strate to what extent firefighters and their association took part in pro-demo‑ cratic and national mobilisation at the end of the 1980s and in the early 1990s in Slovenia, and how they managed to preserve, or even extend, their autonomy vis à vis the state. Firstly, the article contributes to scholarship which views the relationship be‑ tween civil society and the state not as separate from one another, but as more flexible and multifaceted.4 Thus, it challenges the historiography of civil society in Eastern Europe and specifically of its role in the transition to a democratic system—in the case of Slovenia, also the transition to an independent nation state—which usually focuses on the anticommunist, oppositional movements or the ‘new alternative’ movements of the 1980s.5 This article, instead, investi‑ gates associations with a century-old tradition and which in the local environ- ment by and large remained spaces of typically conventional values, while cultivating local autonomy and devotion to unpaid public service. The study is structured in five parts. First, I give a short overview of the first century of volunteer firefighting in Slovenia, underlining especially its importance for Slovene national aspirations. In the second part, I introduce the changes that affected firefighters after 1968, as for example in 1974 the new Yu‑ goslav constitution included policies based on the idea of the withering away of the state. Thirdly, I concentrate on transition to a democratic system, includ‑ ing the position of firefighters in the first democratic elections and their rapid integration into the new national structures. Fourthly, I discuss the transition 4 Fabio Giomi / Stefano Petrungaro, eds, Voluntary Associations in Yugosla‑ via (1918–1941), special issue, European Review of History 26, no. 1 (2019), 1–18, DOI: 10.1080/13507486.2018.1474178; Nicole Kramer / Christine G. Krüger, eds, Freiwilligenar‑ beit und gemeinnützige Organisationen im Wandel. Neue Perspektiven auf das 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, Berlin, Boston 2019; Čarna Brković, Ambiguous Nations of ‘National Self’ in Montenegro, in: Ulf Brunnbauer / Hannes Grandits, eds, The Ambiguous Nation. Case Studies from Southeastern Europe in the 20th Century, Munich 2013, 113–149. Cf. also Oli‑ ver Zunz, Philanthropy in America. A History, Princeton 2011; Pat Thane, The Ben Pimlott Memorial Lecture 2011: The ‘Big Society’ and the ‘Big State’. Creative Tension or Crowding Out?, Twentieth Century British History 23, no. 3 (2012), 408–429, https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/ hws009; Bernard Harris / Paul Bridgen, Introduction. The ‘Mixed Economy of Welfare’ and the Historiography of Welfare Provision, in: Bernard Harris / Paul Bridgen, eds, Charity and Mutual Aid in Europe and North America since 1800, New York, London 2007, 1–18. 5 For Slovenia, cf. Žiga Vodovnik, Demokratizacija in nova družbena gibanja, Teorija in praksa 51, no. 2–3 (2014), 415–433; and Marko Zajc, When the Slovenian Spring Turned into a Hot Summer, in: Joachim von Puttkamer / Włodzimierz Borodziej / Stanislav Holubec, eds, From Revolution to Uncertainty. The Year 1990 in Central and Eastern Europe, New York 2020, 142–163. Volunteer Firefighters and Slovenian Nation- and State-Building from Below 151 to a nation state and recognition of the firefighters’ association as a patriotic organisation in the process of achieving Slovenian independence. I conclude by discussing more generally the heterogeneity of civil society during late socialist Slovenia and the subsequent postsocialist transitions. Voluntary Firefighting in Slovenia. A Brief Overview of Its First Century The Importance of the Slovenian Language. The Late Habsburg and Interwar Periods In the Slovene-speaking lands of the Habsburg Empire, volunteer fire depart‑ ments (VFDs) started to proliferate from the late 1860s onwards. They grew, for example, out of the enthusiasm of those town residents who had seen such associations elsewhere, or were established on the mayor’s initiative.
Recommended publications
  • National Museums in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Slovenia: a Story of Making ’Us’ Vanja Lozic
    Building National Museums in Europe 1750-2010. Conference proceedings from EuNaMus, European National Museums: Identity Politics, the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen, Bologna 28-30 April 2011. Peter Aronsson & Gabriella Elgenius (eds) EuNaMus Report No 1. Published by Linköping University Electronic Press: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_home/index.en.aspx?issue=064 © The Author. National Museums in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Slovenia: A Story of Making ’Us’ Vanja Lozic Summary This study explores the history of the five most significant national and regional museums in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia. The aim is to show how these museums contribute to the construction of national and other identities through collections, selections and classifications of objects of interest and through historical narratives. The three museums from Bosnia and Herzegovina that are included in this study are The National Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Sarajevo; which was founded in 1888 and is the oldest institution of this kind in the country; the History Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina founded in 1945 (Sarajevo) and the Museum of the Republic of Srpska in Banja Luka (the second largest city in BiH), which was founded in 1930 under the name the Museum of Vrbas Banovina. As far as Slovenia is concerned, two analysed museums, namely the National Museum of Slovenia (est. 1821) and the Museum of Contemporary History of Slovenia (est. 1944/1948), are situated in Ljubljana, the capital of Slovenia. The most significant periods for the creation of museums as a part of the consolidation of political power and construction of regional and/or national identities can be labelled: The period under the Austrian empire (-1918) and the establishment of first regional museums.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Network Le Reseau Global
    THE GLOBAL NETWORK LE RESEAU GLOBAL NO. 4-5 Le Reseau The Network Communication and Society in Eastern Europe • Communication et Societé en Europe de l’Est No 4-5 MARCH / JUNE 1996 Peter Gross & Ray Hiebert Departures on an Old Fashioned Track. Broadcast Laws in Romania, Poland and The Czech Republic Vesella Tabakova Women and Media in Bulgaria: Access to Expression and Decision Making File / Dossier Detailed presentation of some Central & Eastern European Schools of Journalism Contents / Sommaire ESSAY ESSAI Tapio Varis Global Communication in the Age of Cyberspace SPECIAL EMPHASIS LE POINT SUR Peter Gross & Ray Hiebert Departures on an Old Fashioned Track. Broadcasting Laws in Romania, Poland and the Czech Republic Marius Lukosiunas & Skirmantas Valiulis Lithuanian Mass Media and Its Legal Regulation Between 1991 - 1995 AR T I C L E S AR T I C L E S Vesella Tabakova Women and Media in Bulgaria: Access to Expression and Decision Making Daniela Frumusani New Role Models for Journalists in Eastern European Countries Teresa Sasinska-Klas Transformation of the Polish Media System FI L E DO S S I E R Detailed Presentation of some Central & Eastern European Schools of Journalism Facultatea de Jurnalism si Stiintele Comunicarii Universitatea Bucuresti FJSC PUB L I S H I N G DIR E C T O R / DIR E C T E U R DE L AP U B L I C A T I O N Mihai Coman „A strong publisher creates a cor- porate culture that can leave its EDITOR / REDACTEUR EN CHEF Oscar Stanciulescu mark on an organisation long after he or she is gone.“ ADVISORY BOARD / COMITÉE DE LECTURE Jean-Pierre Bacot France Philip Meyer Claude Jean Bertrand France Peter Gross US „An editor should tell the writer Andrei Marga Romania his writing is better than it is.
    [Show full text]
  • Prispevek Kulturnega in Civilnodružbenega Segmenta K Uvedbi Demokracije in Neodvisnosti Slovenije
    UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE Luka Perš Prispevek kulturnega in civilnodružbenega segmenta k uvedbi demokracije in neodvisnosti Slovenije Diplomsko delo Ljubljana, 2011 UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE Luka Perš Mentor: red. prof. dr. Janko Prunk Prispevek kulturnega in civilnodružbenega segmenta k uvedbi demokracije in neodvisnosti Slovenije Diplomsko delo Ljubljana, 2011 Najlepše se zahvaljujem svojemu mentorju, red. prof. dr. Janko Prunku, za svetovanje in pomoč pri diplomski nalogi. Najlepše se zahvaljujem svojima profesorjema, doc. dr. Milanu Balažicu in izr.prof. dr. Gregorju Tomcu, pri pomaganju literature. Zahvaljujem se družini, sorodnikom, prijateljem in znancem za vso podporo ob mojem študiju. Na koncu pa se zahvaljujem Katji, ki me je vedno spodbujala in na koncu pregledala nalogo. Prispevek kulturnega in civilnodružbenega segmenta k uvedbi demokracije in neodvisnosti Slovenije V svoji diplomski nalogi sem obravnaval kulturna in civilna družbena gibanja v socialistični Jugoslaviji, ki so se borila za samostojno in demokratično Slovenijo. Največ pozornosti bom posvetil posameznikom in organizacijam, ki so se borili za samostojno Slovenijo. V začetku svoje naloge bom izpostavil delovanje Jožeta Pučnika. V 70-ih letih se mu je pridružil Edvard Kocbek s svojim prelomnim intervjujem z Borisom Pahorjem leta 1975. Moja raziskovalna naloga pa bo najbolj osredotočena v 80. leta prejšnjega stoletja. Osemdeseta je odprla alternativna glasba, ki je prebudila bodočo uporno generacijo. Svoje so dodali Pankrti in ostali pankovske skupine ter Laibach. Takrat je nastal vrhunec civilno družbene sfere, ko sta vzleteli osvobojena Zveza socialistične mladine Slovenije in Odbor za varstvo človekovih pravic, ki velja za največjo civilno družbeno organizacijo v Sloveniji, ki je zadala odločilni in končni udarec takratni vladajoči oblasti, ko se je zavzemala za osvoboditev zapornikov Janeza Janše, Ivana Borštnerja, David Tasić in Francija Zavrla.
    [Show full text]
  • The Far Right in Slovenia
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Far Right in Slovenia Master‟s thesis Bc. Lucie Chládková Supervisor: doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D. UČO: 333105 Field of Study: Security and Strategic Studies Matriculation Year: 2012 Brno 2014 Declaration of authorship of the thesis Hereby I confirm that this master‟s thesis “The Far Right in Slovenia” is an outcome of my own elaboration and work and I used only sources here mentioned. Brno, 10 May 2014 ……………………………………… Lucie Chládková 2 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D., who supervised this thesis and contributed with a lot of valuable remarks and advice. I would like to also thank to all respondents from interviews for their help and information they shared with me. 3 Annotation This master‟s thesis deals with the far right in Slovenia after 1991 until today. The main aim of this case study is the description and analysis of far-right political parties, informal and formal organisations and subcultures. Special emphasis is put on the organisational structure of the far-right scene and on the ideological affiliation of individual far-right organisations. Keywords far right, Slovenia, political party, organisation, ideology, nationalism, extremism, Blood and Honour, patriotic, neo-Nazi, populism. 4 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 2. Methodology .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ljubljana Tourism
    AKEYTOLJUBLJANA MANUAL FOR TRAVEL TRADE PROFESSIONALS Index Ljubljana 01 LJUBLJANA 02 FACTS 03 THE CITY Why Ljubljana ............................................................. 4 Numbers & figures.............................................. 10 Ljubljana’s history ................................................ 14 Ljubljana Tourism ................................................... 6 Getting to Ljubljana ........................................... 12 Plečnik’s Ljubljana ............................................... 16 Testimonials .................................................................. 8 Top City sights ......................................................... 18 City map ........................................................................... 9 ART & RELAX & 04 CULTURE 05 GREEN 06 ENJOY Art & culture .............................................................. 22 Green Ljubljana ...................................................... 28 Food & drink .............................................................. 36 Recreation & wellness .................................... 32 Shopping ...................................................................... 40 Souvenirs ..................................................................... 44 Entertainment ........................................................ 46 TOURS & 07 EXCURSIONS 08 ACCOMMODATION 09 INFO City tours & excursions ................................ 50 Hotels in Ljubljana .............................................. 58 Useful information ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots of Hate the Online Responsibility of Public Figures
    Platforms, Experts, Tools: Specialised Cyber-Activists Network Hotspots of Hate The online responsibility of public figures Project funded by the European Union’s Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme (2014-2020) About the Project The EU-funded project sCAN – Platforms, Experts, Tools: Specialised Cyber-Activists Network (2018-2020), coordinated by Licra (International League Against Racism and Antisemitism), aims at gathering expertise, tools, methodology and knowledge on cyber hate and develop- ing transnational comprehensive practices for identifying, analysing, reporting and counter- acting online hate speech. This project draws on the results of successful European projects already realised, for example the project “Research, Report, Remove: Countering Cyber-Hate phenomena” and “Facing Facts”, and strives to continue, emphasize and strengthen the initi- atives developed by civil society for counteracting hate speech. Through cross-European cooperation, the project partners are enhancing and (further) in- ten-sifying their fruitful collaboration. The sCAN project partners are contributing to select- ing and providing relevant automated monitoring tools to improve the detection of hateful con-tent. Another key aspect of sCAN is the strengthening of the monitoring actions (e.g. the monitoring exercises) set up by the European Commission. The project partners are also jointly gathering knowledge and findings to better identify, ex-plain and understand trends of cyber hate at a transnational level. Furthermore, this project aims
    [Show full text]
  • May '68 in Yugoslavia
    SLAVICA TER 24 SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal VOLUME 24 (2020/I) May ’68 in Yugoslavia SLAVICA TER 24 SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal VOLUME 24 (2020/I) May ’68 in Yugoslavia SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal ISSN 1592-0291 (print) & 2283-5482 (online) WEB www.slavica-ter.org EMAIL [email protected] PUBLISHED BY Università degli Studi di Trieste Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche, del Linguaggio, dell’Interpretazione e della Traduzione Universität Konstanz Fachbereich Literaturwissenschaft Univerza v Ljubljani Filozofska fakulteta, Oddelek za slavistiko EDITORIAL BOARD Roman Bobryk (Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities) Margherita De Michiel (University of Trieste) Tomáš Glanc (University of Zurich) Vladimir Feshchenko (Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences) Kornelija Ičin (University of Belgrade) Miha Javornik (University of Ljubljana) Jurij Murašov (University of Konstanz) Blaž Podlesnik (University of Ljubljana, technical editor) Ivan Verč (University of Trieste, editor in chief) ISSUE CO-EDITED BY Jernej Habjan and Andraž Jež EDITORIAL Antonella D’Amelia (University of Salerno) ADVISORY BOARD Patrizia Deotto (University of Trieste) Nikolaj Jež (University of Ljubljana) Alenka Koron (Institute of Slovenian Literature and Literary Studies) Đurđa Strsoglavec (University of Ljubljana) Tomo Virk (University of Ljubljana) DESIGN & LAYOUT Aljaž Vesel & Anja Delbello / AA Copyright by Authors Contents 8 Yugoslavia between May ’68 and November ’89:
    [Show full text]
  • CARNIVAL XVIII and XIX / July 2018
    CARNIVAL XVIII and XIX / July 2018 Journal of the International Students of History Association ISSN: INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS OF HISTORY ASSOCIATION ISHA INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT C/0 FACHSCHAFTSINITIATIVE GESCHICHTE HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN INSTITUT FÜR GESCHICHTSWISSENSCHAFTEN FRIEDRICHSTRASSE 191-193A 10099 BERLIN WWW.ISHA-INTERNATIONAL.ORG FACEBOOK: CARNIVAL – JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS OF HISTORY ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL BOARD 2017/2018 Lucija Balikić, President Miriam Eisleb, Vice President Dániel Molnár, Vice President Tamara Pataki, Secretary Natasha Rieke, Treasurer EDITORS-IN-CHIEF Alexandra Leonzini, 2016/2017 Ryan Glauser, 2017/2018 EDITING TEAM Erzsébet Árvay Anita Bacher Elisa Guerrini Aleksiejūnas Eric Jeswein Tamara Pataki Toni Šafer COVER DESIGN Ryan Glauser Facts and opinions published in these papers express the opinions of the respective authors and not the editorial committee of Carnival. Authors are responsible for their citations and use of sources, and the accuracy of their references and bibliographies. ISHA cannot be held responsible for any omissions or possible violations of rights of third parties. Table of Contents Research Articles Croats and Serbs through the Lens of Vuk Karadžić's Serbian Language Reform and Ilija Garašanin's Serbian National Program By Lucija Balikić, University of Zagreb, Translated by Marko Babić......................................................1 Crossing Borders? Migration Inside Yugoslavia By Matej Samide, Humboldt University Berlin.......................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Punkowa Lublana W Późnych Latach Siedemdziesiątych I Wczesnych Osiemdziesiątych Xx Wieku
    doi: 10.35757/KiS.2010.54.4.11 POLSKAAKADEMIANAUK ISSN 0023-5172 KOMITETSOCJOLOGII INSTYTUTSTUDIÓWPOLITYCZNYCH 2010, nr 4 W STRONĘ PRZESZŁOŚCI OSKAR MULEJ Lublana „TONIEMY W CZERWONYCH BURACZKACH, ZATYKAJĄC DZIURY W ŻELAZNEJ KURTYNIE”* PUNKOWA LUBLANA W PÓŹNYCH LATACH SIEDEMDZIESIĄTYCH I WCZESNYCH OSIEMDZIESIĄTYCH XX WIEKU Zamierzam tu zarysować dzieje sceny punkowej w Lublanie, stolicy Słowe- nii. Na szerszym tle jugosłowiańskiej sceny punkowej i nowofalowej Słowenia, a w szczególności Lublana, była przypadkiem szczególnym — to właśnie Sło- weńcom przypadła bowiem rola pionierów w tym zakresie. W Lublanie wcze- snych lat osiemdziesiątych XX wieku punk zdobył sobie ogromną popularność jako fenomen subkulturowy, a wokół lublańskiej sceny punkowej narodziło się wiele artystycznych projektów. Co więcej, chociaż podobne zjawiska mu- zyczne zaistniały także w innych jugosłowiańskich miastach, nie odegrały one tak istotnej roli. W słoweńskiej stolicy, jak nigdzie indziej, punk był bardzo poważnym ruchem społecznym. Rockowa scena Federalnej Socjalistycznej Republiki Jugosławii, usytuowana między Wschodem a Zachodem, budzi spore zainteresowanie fanów muzyki. Polityka wewnętrzna władz jugosłowiańskich, stosunkowo liberalna, w porów- naniu do pozostałych krajów bloku wschodniego, pozwalała na większą swo- bodę artystyczną i stawiała mniej przeszkód na drodze rozwoju alternatywnej sceny muzycznej. Nie oznacza jednak to, że system nie pokazywał w różnych sytuacjach swojej represywnej natury. Specyficzne i jedyne w swoim rodzaju style muzyczne mogły się rozwijać, czerpiąc z trendów przychodzących z Za- chodu, lecz jednocześnie wplatające lokalne elementy, zarówno w warstwie tekstowej, jak i muzycznej. Stosunkowo krótki epizod jugosłowiańskiej nowej fali (słow. i chor. novi val,serb.novi talas) był pod tym względem szczególnie bo- gaty i zróżnicowany. Pozostawił po sobie niezatarte piętno, a ówczesne gwiazdy być może są jeszcze bardziej popularne dziś aniżeli w czasach swej aktywności.
    [Show full text]
  • Replace This with the Actual Title Using All Caps
    WHEN STATES ‘COME OUT’: THE POLITICS OF VISIBILITY AND THE DIFFUSION OF SEXUAL MINORITY RIGHTS IN EUROPE A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Phillip Mansour Ayoub August 2013 © 2013 Phillip Mansour Ayoub WHEN STATES ‘COME OUT’: THE POLITICS OF VISIBILITY AND THE DIFFUSION OF SEXUAL MINORITY RIGHTS IN EUROPE Phillip Mansour Ayoub, Ph. D. Cornell University 2013 This dissertation explains how the politics of visibility affect relations among states and the political power of marginalized people within them. I show that the key to understanding processes of social change lies in a closer examination of the ways in which—and the degree to which—marginalized groups make governments and societies see and interact with their ideas. Specifically, I explore the politics of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) visibility. For a group that many observers have referred to as “an invisible minority,” the newfound presence and influence of LGBT people in many different nation states offers fresh opportunities for the study of socio-political change and the diffusion of norms. Despite similar international pressures, why are the trajectories of socio-legal recognition for marginalized groups so different across states? This question is not answered by conventional explanations of diffusion and social change focusing on differences in international pressures, the fit between domestic and international norms, modernization, or low implementation costs. Instead, specific transnational and international channels and domestic interest groups can make visible political issues that were hidden, and it is that visibility that creates the political resonance of international norms in domestic politics, and can lead to their gradual internalization.
    [Show full text]
  • SLOVENIA Mapping Digital Media: Slovenia
    COUNTRY REPORT MAPPING DIGITAL MEDIA: SLOVENIA Mapping Digital Media: Slovenia A REPORT BY THE OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS WRITTEN BY Marko Milosavljevic´ and Tanja Kerševan Smokvina EDITED BY Marius Dragomir and Mark Thompson (Open Society Media Program editors) Magda Walter (regional editor) EDITORIAL COMMISSION Yuen-Ying Chan, Christian S. Nissen, Dusˇan Reljic´, Russell Southwood, Michael Starks, Damian Tambini The Editorial Commission is an advisory body. Its members are not responsible for the information or assessments contained in the Mapping Digital Media texts OPEN SOCIETY MEDIA PROGRAM TEAM Meijinder Kaur, program assistant; Morris Lipson, senior legal advisor; and Gordana Jankovic, director OPEN SOCIETY INFORMATION PROGRAM TEAM Vera Franz, senior program manager; Darius Cuplinskas, director 5 August 2012 Contents Mapping Digital Media ..................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 6 Context ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Social Indicators ................................................................................................................................ 12 Economic Indicators ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 14E PLENARY SESSION
    The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities 14th PLENARY SESSION CG(14)3 30 May 2007 State of the Congress Halvdan SKARD, (Norway, L, SOC) Activity report of the President and priorites of the Congress for 2007-2008 Table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 2. SESSIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 13th Plenary Session of the Congress (Strasbourg, 30 May – 1st June 2006) ....................... 4 2.1.1 Summary of the work of the Plenary Session .................................................... 4 2.1.2. Summary of the work of the Plenary Session of the Chamber of Local Authorities .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3. Summary of the work of the Plenary Session of the Chamber of Regions ........ 6 2.2. Autumn Institutional Session (Moscow, 14-15 November 2006) ........................................... 7 2.2.1. Summary of the work of the Autumn Institutional Session in plenary .............. 7 2.2.2. Summary of the work of the Autumn Institutional Session of the Chamber of Local Authorities ................................................................................................................ 8 2.2.3. Summary of the work of the Institutional Session of the Chamber of Regions . 9 2.2.4 Meeting of the Standing
    [Show full text]