May '68 in Yugoslavia

SLAVICA TER 24 SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal VOLUME 24 (2020/I) May ’68 in Yugoslavia SLAVICA TER 24 SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal VOLUME 24 (2020/I) May ’68 in Yugoslavia SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal ISSN 1592-0291 (print) & 2283-5482 (online) WEB www.slavica-ter.org EMAIL [email protected] PUBLISHED BY Università degli Studi di Trieste Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche, del Linguaggio, dell’Interpretazione e della Traduzione Universität Konstanz Fachbereich Literaturwissenschaft Univerza v Ljubljani Filozofska fakulteta, Oddelek za slavistiko EDITORIAL BOARD Roman Bobryk (Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities) Margherita De Michiel (University of Trieste) Tomáš Glanc (University of Zurich) Vladimir Feshchenko (Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences) Kornelija Ičin (University of Belgrade) Miha Javornik (University of Ljubljana) Jurij Murašov (University of Konstanz) Blaž Podlesnik (University of Ljubljana, technical editor) Ivan Verč (University of Trieste, editor in chief) ISSUE CO-EDITED BY Jernej Habjan and Andraž Jež EDITORIAL Antonella D’Amelia (University of Salerno) ADVISORY BOARD Patrizia Deotto (University of Trieste) Nikolaj Jež (University of Ljubljana) Alenka Koron (Institute of Slovenian Literature and Literary Studies) Đurđa Strsoglavec (University of Ljubljana) Tomo Virk (University of Ljubljana) DESIGN & LAYOUT Aljaž Vesel & Anja Delbello / AA Copyright by Authors Contents 8 Yugoslavia between May ’68 and November ’89: Introduction Jugoslavija između maja ’68 i novembra ’89: uvod ❦ jernej Habjan Contributions 20 Aesthetic ‘Traditions and Perspectives’ and the Politics of the Yugoslav 1968 Estetske »tradicije i perspektive« i politika ’68. u Jugoslaviji ❦ ivana PeriCa 50 Not even a Desperate Attempt to Defend Socialism: Two Theoretical and Ideological Currents in Contemporary Slovenian History Ni očajanički pokušaj obrane socijalizma: dva teorijska i ideološka toka u savremenoj slovenačkoj istoriografiji ❦ Lev CentriH 72 From the Marginal to the Exemplary Od marginalnog do egzemplarnog ❦ Lev Kreft 94 Protests of 1968: The Politics of Memory or the Memory of Politics? Protesti 1968: politika sećanja ili sećanje na politiku? ❦ Vladimir Gvozden 114 Slovenian Intellectuals of the 1960s from the Political Point of View Slovenački intelektualci u šezdesetim godinama s političke tačke gledišta ❦ aLeš Gabrič SLAVICA TERGESTINA 24 (2020/I) ▶ May ’68 in Yugoslavia 130 May ’68 and the Emergence of écriture féminine: The French Centre and the Slovenian Periphery Maj ’68 i nastanak écriture féminine: Francuska i Slovenija – centar i periferija ❦ varja baLžaLorsKy antić 160 In the Name of Freedom: The Poetic Ludism of Milan Jesih U ime slobode: pesnički ludizam Milana Jesiha ❦ darja PavLič 184 Crisis of the Journal Problemi in 1968 Kriza časopisa Problemi 1968. godine ❦ andrej tomažin 208 From Theatre Experiments to National Institutions: Lado Kralj and Dušan Jovanović between 1968 and the 1980s Od pozorišnog eksperimenta do nacionalne institucije: Lado Kralj i Dušan Jovanović između 1968. i osamdesetih godina ❦ GašPer troHa 230 Czechoslovak ‘Normalisation’ in the Fiction of Vilenica Prize Laureates Čehoslovačka »normalizacija« u prozi laureata Vilenice ❦ CHarLes sabatos 250 ‘In thousands of poems you seek a worldwide retrospective of crime and death’: Ethical, Activist and Intellectual Rigour in Jure Detela »U hiljadu pesama tražiš svetsku retrospektivu zločina i smrti«: etička, aktivistička i misaona oštrina Jureta Detele ❦ branisLava vičar 7 DOI ▶ 10.13137/2283-5482/30665 Yugoslavia between May ’68 and November ’89: Introduction¹ Jugoslavija između maja ’68 i novembra ’89: uvod ❦ jernej Habjan ▶ [email protected] SLAVICA TERGESTINA 24 (2020/I) ▶ May ’68 in Yugoslavia Looking back at the recent fiftieth anniversary of mai 68 and the even 1 The editorial work more recent thirtieth anniversary of die Wende, ‘Yugoslavia between on this cluster of ar- ticles and the writing May ’68 and November ’89’ traces the impact of these global events of the introduction took place at the on Yugoslavia, a country where the surprising non-violence of student Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy protests was matched only be the shocking violence of capitalist tran- of Sciences and Arts in the framework sition. During the last half-century, May ’68 has been portrayed mostly of the research project ‘May ’68 in Literature as a revolt led by students and workers around the world against state- and Theory: The Last Season of Modernism led industrial society typical both for the US-American hegemony in France, Slove- nia, and the World’ and for the Soviet alternative. As such, the revolution tends to be as- (J6-9384) and the research programme sociated, on the one hand, with NATO member states such as France ‘Studies in Literary History, Literary or the US and, on the other, with members of the Warsaw Pact such Theory and Method- ology’ (P6-0024), both as Czechoslovakia or Poland. However, May ’68 resonated also in Yugo- of which were funded by the Slovenian slavia, a country which not only was aligned neither to NATO nor to the Research Agency. Soviet bloc, but was even the leader of the Non-Aligned Movement, a worldwide attempt to oppose both geopolitical blocs. Yugoslavia is thus a rare case of May ’68 going beyond the critique of the Cold-War stalemate; a case where this critique of both the US and the USSR was always already the official position of the regime itself; a case where Fordist industrial society common both to the capitalist West and the real-socialist East was challenged by the experiment of workers’ self-management, which Yugoslavia introduced two decades before 1968 and abolished two decades after it. What was, then, the object of critique in and following 1968 in a country like Yugoslavia? But first we should take a step back and ask ourselves if we re- ally need to formulate any of this in terms of anniversaries—not one, but two anniversaries. After all, an anniversary is a bizarre and certainly pre-theoretical mix of the evental and the conjunctural; it is what Fernand Braudel, a key figure in the second generation of the Annales school of history, would call an event, but an event 9 JERNEJ HABJAN ▶ Yugoslavia between May ’68 and November ’89: Introduction removed from us by what he might call a conjuncture. In this respect, May ’68 at fifty is neither an event nor a conjuncture; it is an event that happened a whole conjuncture ago. And November ’89 at thirty is of course no better. However, adding November ’89 at thirty to May ’68 at fifty does not necessarily make things twice as bad. If we look back at what prover- bially started in Paris in 1968 from the perspective of what supposedly began in East Berlin in 1989, this at least gives us a chance to move from both the evental and the conjunctural and grasp the structural, the real interest of Fernand Braudel. Indeed, according to world-systems theory, the main contemporary successor of Braudelian history, 1989 was a continuation of 1968: a continuation of its liberalism, according to Giovanni Arrighi’s as- sessment at the time (see Arrighi, Hopkins and Wallerstein 1992), or a continuation of its neo-liberalism, according to Arrighi’s revision from a decade later (see Arrighi). Moreover, 1968 itself was a repetition of 1848, according to Arrighi and his colleagues, who saw the bourgeois revolution of 1848 and May ’68 as the only world revolutions: just as 1848 was a failed but world-scale return to 1789, so too May ’68 was a failed but world-scale return to 1917; and just as the 1848 revolution formed the original Left as a rehearsal for 1917, so too May ’68 spawned the New Left as a rehearsal for 1989. In turn, 1848 was, ‘in a Hegeli- an sense, the sublation (Aufhebung) of 1789’ (Arrighi, Hopkins and Wallerstein 1989: 98). Which is a peculiar reference by Arrighi and his colleagues, given that Karl Marx refers to G. W. F. Hegel to portray 1848 as a farcical repetition not of 1789, but of 1799, when Napoleon had his coup d’état, itself a tragic repetition of the Roman republic. Hence, the first reason to think about the dates of revolutions is that revolutionaries themselves do it. The Yellow vests movement 10 SLAVICA TERGESTINA 24 (2020/I) ▶ May ’68 in Yugoslavia started in French social media in May 2018, exactly fifty years after May ’68. By November, the movement spread onto the streets of France and beyond: wearing the high-visibility vests that French law had required of them as a safety measure, motorists demanded real safety measures, including the reintroduction of the solidarity tax. In the process, protesters also produced a tricolore with three dates on it, one for each colour: 1789, 1968 and 2018 (with the red third of the flag going to 2018). The year 1989 was missing from the flag, of course, no doubt because the revolutionaries of 1989 had approached their revolution as the exact opposite of May ’68: a pro-capitalist upheaval, not an anti-capitalist one. But this is just a further example of revolutionaries conjuring up past revolutions, an example that becomes even more telling if we agree with Arrighi and others who, as we just saw, claim that 1989 was a continuation of 1968. So, dates of revolutions are important to revolutionaries themselves. But they are important in periods without revolutions as well. In those periods, past revolutions are domesticated like family members who are thrown a party for their birthday, especially for their fiftieth, sixtieth … hundredth birthday. Finally, 1968, 1989 and Yugosla- via meet even at the level where ‘Yugoslavia between May ’68 and No- vember ’89’ tries to place itself, namely the level of theory: as Hrvoje Klasić writes (9), the changes brought about by the fall of the Berlin Wall included also a new scholarly interest in the Yugoslav May ’68, a topic that remained conspicuously marginal in Yugoslav humanities and social sciences until the country’s breakup.

Load more