Seção V - Gênese, Morfologia E Classificação Do Solo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Effect of Soil Chiseling on Soil Structure and Root Growth for a Clayey Soil Under No-Tillage
Geoderma 259–260 (2015) 149–155 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geoderma journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geoderma Effect of soil chiseling on soil structure and root growth for a clayey soil under no-tillage Márcio Renato Nunes a,⁎, José Eloir Denardin b, Eloy Antônio Pauletto c, Antônio Faganello b, Luiz Fernando Spinelli Pinto c a University of São Paulo, “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Avenida Pádua Dias, 11, CEP 13418-900 Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil b Embrapa Trigo, Rodovia BR 285, km. 294, P.O. Box 451, CEP 99001-970 Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil c Federal University of Pelotas, Department of Soil Science, Campus Universitário s/n, P.O. Box 354, 96010-900 Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil article info abstract Article history: Soil chiseling under no-tillage (NT) promotes root growth in depth. This practice, however, might affect soil ag- Received 11 November 2014 gregation. This study evaluated the chiseling effects on the aggregation of a Ferralic Nitisol (Rhodic), under NT, in Received in revised form 2 June 2015 humid subtropical climate region. The treatments carried out consisted of the time that soil was kept under NT Accepted 3 June 2015 after chiseling: continuous NT for 24 months after chiseling in September 2009; continuous NT for 18 months Available online xxxx after chiseling in March 2010; continuous NT for 12 months after chiseling in September 2010; continuous NT for 6 months after chiseling in March 2011; NT in newly chiseling soil in September 2011; continuous NT without Keywords: Soil physical attributes chiseling (control). -
General Characteristics of Soil| Sample Answer
General Characteristics of Soil| sample answer Q: ‘Examine the general composition and characteristics of any one soil type that you have studied’ (2007 Q17) Latosol- A tropical zonal soil. 3 aspects will be discussed. 1. Composition: Soil is composed of a number of ingredients/components. These components can vary in portion. All soils form as result of the action of several factors. THese factors combine to influence the many processes at work in soil formation eg. Leaching and weathering. These give soil its own characteristics. Soil is composed of number of ingredients and constituents. The components of soil are mixed in different quantities to create different soil types. They are made up of mineral matter, air, water, humus, living organisms. However, climate is the single most important factor in determining what a soil will be like as climate influences vegetation, the rate of weathering and soil, forming processing in an area. The majority of soil is composed of mineral matter. Mineral matter are rock particles from the bedrock and weathered rock. The soil type varies depending on mineral matter. Unconsolidated material eg boulder clay will help form soil more rapidly than solid bedrock as it is partly weathered. Soil is also composed of organic matter. Organic matter includes decaying plants and animals which bacteria and fungi breakdown. Humus is a dark brown jelly-like substance formed from organic matter. Living organisms are also included in ‘organic matter’, earthworms, beetles, fungi, bacteria; they digest organic matter to humus and also mix and create soil. Water is another important component of soil. -
Fate of Organic Carbon in Paddy Soils – Results of Alisol and Andosol Incubation with 13C Marker
Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 18, EGU2016-17404, 2016 EGU General Assembly 2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Fate of organic carbon in paddy soils – results of Alisol and Andosol incubation with 13C marker Pauline Winkler (1), Chiara Cerli (2), Sabine Fiedler (3), Susanne Woche (4), Sri Rahayu Utami (5), Reinhold Jahn (1), Karsten Kalbitz (6), and Klaus Kaiser (1) (1) Soil Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, (2) Earth Surface Science, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (3) Soil Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany, (4) Soil Science, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany, (5) Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia, (6) Soil Science & Site Ecology, TU Dresden, Germany For a better understanding of organic carbon (OC) decomposition in paddy soils an incubation experiment was performed. Two soil types with contrasting mineralogy (Alisol and Andosol) were exposed to 8 anoxic–oxic cycles over 1 year. Soils received rice straw marked with 13C (228 at the beginning of each cycle. A second set of samples without straw addition was used as control. Headspacesh of the incubation vessels were regularly analysed for CO2 and CH4. In soil solutions, redox potential, pH, dissolved organic C (DOC), and Fe2+ were measured after each anoxic and each oxic phase. Soils were fractionated by density at the end of the experiment and the different fractions were isotopically analysed. Samples of genuine paddy soils that developed from the test soils were used as reference. During anoxic cycles, soils receiving rice straw released large amounts of CO2 and CH4, indicating strong micro- bial activity. -
World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. -
The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR)
The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 1 Draft, Nov. 2007 The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) e. V., Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Objectives 4 2. Concept 5 3. Procedure and scoring tables 7 3.1. Field procedure 7 3.2. Scoring of basic indicators 10 3.2.0. What are basic indicators? 10 3.2.1. Soil substrate 12 3.2.2. Depth of A horizon or depth of humic soil 14 3.2.3. Topsoil structure 15 3.2.4. Subsoil compaction 17 3.2.5. Rooting depth and depth of biological activity 19 3.2.6. -
Effects of Afforestation on Soil Structure Formation in Two Climatic Regions Of
JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 61, 2015 (5): 225–234 doi: 10.17221/6/2015-JFS Eff ects of aff orestation on soil structure formation in two climatic regions of the Czech Republic V. Podrázský1, O. Holubík2, J. Vopravil2, T. Khel2, W.K. Moser3, H. Prknová1 1Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 2Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Department of Soil Science and Soil Conservation, Prague-Zbraslav, Czech Republic 3U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of agricultural land afforestation on soil characteristics. Two sites in two regions of the Czech Republic were evaluated, at lower as well as higher submountain elevations: in the regions of the Orlické hory Mts. and Kostelec nad Černými lesy, afforested, arable and pasture lands were com- pared for basic chemical and physical characteristics. It was determined: pH, CEC, exchangeable nutrients, SOC, bulk density, volume density, porosity (differentiated by pore size), water conductivity and soil aggregate stability. This study demonstrated the important influence of previous land use upon soil characteristics. The characteristics of the arable horizon can persist for many years; in forests, the mineral horizons (15–30 cm) can persist within 15–30 years after afforestation. Afforestation, which caused an increase in soil porosity by decreasing reduced bulk density and increasing capillary and gravitational pores (increasing the water-holding capacity and soil air capacity), is important for maintaining the soil stability. The positive effect on infiltration and retention capacity resulted not only from the presence of a forest overstorey, but also from the presence of permanent grass cover of pasture land. -
Steps and Methods for the Identification of Potential Land-Use Units
Steps and Methods for the Identification of Potential Land-Use Units In the San Patong Land Reform Area, Chiang Mai Province, Northern Thailand Dr. Harald Kirsch1, German Development Service (DED), Phnom Penh Abstract Within a joint project carried out by three academic institutions from Germany, Netherlands and Thailand in 1992 - 1995 potential land-use units were defined for a land reform area in Northern Thailand. After a stepwise integration of physical and socio-economic data all land use potentials and con- strains were analysed to explain land use changes occurred during the project period, and to sug- gest potential future types of land utilization. Besides economical constrains, the soil quality and access to water proved to be the main factors. Since the physical conditions defining the land suitability in the study area are very similar to the flat to slightly undulating lowland areas of Cambodia, conclusions for a process leading from land resource assessment (LRA) to a land suitability evaluation in this country can be drawn. Land suit- ability evaluation is supposed to support Participatory Land Use Planning (PLUP) in Cambodia. This paper summarizes the content and main points of the corresponding presentation given by the author during the LRA Forum in Phnom Penh, Cambodia in Sept. 20042. 1. Introduction The project reported here, with the title Improvement of Crop Yields and Simultaneous Environ- mental Impact Assessment in Conjunction with Intensification and Diversification of Agroforestry on Marginal Land in Northern Thailand was carried out between May 1992 and April 1995. It was sup- ported by the European Commission under the program "Life Sciences and Technologies for De- veloping Countries #3 (STD3). -
Soil Organic Matter As Sole Indicator of Soil Degradation
Environ Monit Assess (2017) 189:176 DOI 10.1007/s10661-017-5881-y Soil organic matter as sole indicator of soil degradation S.E. Obalum & G.U. Chibuike & S. Peth & Y. Ouyang Received: 27 July 2016 /Accepted: 7 March 2017 # Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 Abstract Soil organic matter (SOM) is known to play properties as well. Thus, functions of SOM almost al- vital roles in the maintenance and improvement of many ways affect various soil properties and processes and soil properties and processes. These roles, which largely engage in multiple reactions. In view of its role in soil influence soil functions, are a pool of specific contribu- aggregation and erosion control, in availability of plant tions of different components of SOM. The soil func- nutrients and in ameliorating other forms of soil degra- tions, in turn, normally define the level of soil degrada- dation than erosion, SOM has proven to be an important tion, viewed as quantifiable temporal changes in a soil indicator of soil degradation. It has been suggested, that impairs its quality. This paper aims at providing a however, that rather than the absolute amount, temporal generalized assessment of the current state of knowl- change and potential amount of SOM be considered in edge on the usefulness of SOM in monitoring soil its use as indicator of soil degradation, and that SOM degradation, based on its influence on the physical, may not be an all-purpose indicator. Whilst SOM re- chemical and biological properties and processes of mains a candidate without substitute as long as a one- soils. -
Ph, SOIL ACIDITY, and PLANT GROWTH 67 Numbers, the Danish Biochemist S
pH, SOIL ACIDITY, AND PLANT GROWTH 67 numbers, the Danish biochemist S. P. L. Sorenson devised a system called pH for expressing the acidity or alka- pH, Soil Acidity, linity of solutions. The pH scale goes from o to 14. At pH 7, the midpoint of the scale, there and Plant Growth are equal numbers of hydrogen and hydroxyl ions, and the solution is neu- W. H. Allaway tral. pH values below 7 indicate an acid solution, where there are more hydro- When crop plants do not grow gen ions than hydroxyl ions, with the well, one of the first questions acidity (or hydrogen ion concentra- tion) increasing as the pH values get the soil scientist usually asks smaller. is, ''What is the pH of the soil?'' pH values above 7 denote alkaline solutions, with the concentration of or, 'Is the soil acid, neutral, hydroxyl ions increasing as the pH or alkaline?'' values get larger. The pH scale is based on logarithms The reason for these questions lies in of the concentration of the hydrogen the fact that the pH, or degree of and hydroxyl ions. This means that a acidity of the soil, often is a symptom solution of pH 5 has 10 times the hy- of some disorder in the chemical con- drogen ion concentration of a solution dition of the soil as it relates to plant of pH 6. A solution of pH 4 has 10 nutrition. times more hydrogen ions than one of A measurement of soil acidity or pH 5 and 10 times 10, or 100 times, alkalinity is like a doctor's measure- the hydrogen ion concentration of a ment of a patient's temperature. -
Redalyc.STRUCTURAL QUALITY of POLYACRYLAMIDE-TREATED
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo ISSN: 0100-0683 [email protected] Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo Brasil Vandeval Maranhão de Melo, Diego; Gomes de Almeida, Brivaldo; Rodrigues de Souza, Edivan; Santos Silva, Laércio; Jacomine, Paulo Klinger Tito STRUCTURAL QUALITY OF POLYACRYLAMIDE-TREATED COHESIVE SOILS IN THE COASTAL TABLELANDS OF PERNAMBUCO Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, vol. 38, núm. 2, 2014, pp. 476-485 Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo Viçosa, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=180231134011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 476 Diego Vandeval Maranhão de Melo et al. STRUCTURAL QUALITY OF POLYACRYLAMIDE-TREATED COHESIVE SOILS IN THE COASTAL TABLELANDS OF PERNAMBUCO(1) Diego Vandeval Maranhão de Melo(2), Brivaldo Gomes de Almeida(3), Edivan Rodrigues de Souza(3), Laércio Santos Silva(4) & Paulo Klinger Tito Jacomine(5) SUMMARY Water-soluble polymers are characterized as effective flocculating agents due to their molecular features. Their application to soils with horizons with structural problems, e.g, a cohesive character, contributes to improvements in the physical quality and thus to the agricultural suitability of such soils. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the structural quality of soils with cohesive horizons of coastal tablelands in the State of Pernambuco treated with polyacrylamide (PAM) as chemical soil conditioner. To this end, three horizons (one cohesive and two non- cohesive) of a Yellow Argisol (Ultisol) were evaluated and to compare cohesive horizons, the horizon of a Yellow Latosol (Oxisol) was selected. -
The Comparative Effects of Calcium Carbonate and of Calcium Silicate on the Yield of Sudan Grass Grown in a Ferruginous Latosol and a Hydrol Humic Latosol
TECHNICAL BULLETIN No. 53 JUNE 1963 The Comparative Effects of Calcium Carbonate and of Calcium Silicate on the Yield of Sudan Grass Grown in a Ferruginous Latosol and a Hydrol Humic Latosol N. H. MONTEITH and G. DONALD SHERMAN HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION, UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII The Comparative Effects of Calcium Carbonate and of Calcium Silicate on the Yield of Sudan Grass Grown in a Ferruginous Latosol and a Hydrol Humic Latosol N. H. MONTEITH and G. DONALD SHERMAN UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII COLLEGE OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURE HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION HONOLULU, H AWAII J UNE 1963 T ECIINICAL B ULLETIN No. 53 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors gra tcfully acknow ledge the assistance of the staff of th e Experiment Station of the H awaii an Sugar Planters' Association in pro viding greenhouse, photographic, and laboratory facilities, and for advice on sta tistical and analytical methods. Research funds on this proj ect were pro vid ed by the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association Experiment Station under a coope rative research agreemcnt with the Department of Agronomy and Soil Science. Funds and materials we re also provided by the Tenn essee Valley Authority, Contract No. TV21132A. THE AUTHORS N. H. MONTEITH was In structor in Agricultur e, University of Hawaii, 1961-1962. DR. G. DONALD SHERMAN, Associate Director of the Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, is Senior Soil Scientist at the Hawaii Agricultural Ex periment Station and Senior Professor of Soil Science, University of Hawaii. CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUcrION 5 LITERAT UHE REVIEW 5 Effect of Calcium Carbonate on Phosphorus Availability 5 Effect of Calcium Carbonate on Other Factors 7 Effect of Calcium Silicate on Phosphorus Availability 8 Effect of Calcium Silicate on Other Factors 8 EXPEmMENTAL PROCEDUHES 9 Soils . -
Humus) from a Consideration of the Chemical and Biochemical Processes of Humification
Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Natural Organic Matter (Humus) From a Consideration of the Chemical and Biochemical Processes of Humification By Robert L. Wershaw Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5121 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. iii Contents Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope.............................................................................................................................. 2 Degradation reactions of plant tissue ............................................................................................. 2 Degradation pathways of plant tissue components ............................................................................... 3 Enzymatic reactions