DOCSLIB.ORG

Humus) from a Consideration of the Chemical and Biochemical Processes of Humification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Humus) from a Consideration of the Chemical and Biochemical Processes of Humification Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Natural Organic Matter (Humus) From a Consideration of the Chemical and Biochemical Processes of Humification By Robert L. Wershaw Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5121 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. iii Contents Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope.............................................................................................................................. 2 Degradation reactions of plant tissue ............................................................................................. 2 Degradation pathways of plant tissue components ............................................................................... 3 Enzymatic reactions ............................................................................................................................ 3 Primary metabolites ................................................................................................................... 4 Carbohydrates.................................................................................................................... 4 Lignin ................................................................................................................................. 5 Plant polyesters ................................................................................................................. 6 Aliphatic acids.................................................................................................................... 8 Plant waxes ........................................................................................................................ 8 Amino acids, proteins, and aminosugars .................................................................... 10 Secondary metabolites............................................................................................................ 10 Tannins............................................................................................................................... 10 Terpenes............................................................................................................................ 11 Pyrolytic reactions............................................................................................................................. 12 Cellulose and other polysaccharides.................................................................................... 14 Amino acids ............................................................................................................................... 14 Lignin and other phenolic compounds.................................................................................. 14 Terpenes..................................................................................................................................... 14 Other miscellaneous plant components ............................................................................... 16 Abiotic reactions................................................................................................................................ 16 Photochemical reactions ........................................................................................................ 16 Direct reactions ............................................................................................................... 16 Indirect reactions ............................................................................................................ 16 Radical oxidative degradation................................................................................................ 17 Browning reactions.................................................................................................................. 19 Interactions of degradation products ..................................................................................................... 29 Evaluation of NOM models........................................................................................................................ 31 Humic polymer model ....................................................................................................................... 31 Molecular aggregate models .......................................................................................................... 31 Compartmental model....................................................................................................................... 31 SOM compartments ................................................................................................................. 31 Partially degraded plant material.................................................................................. 32 Microbial biomass ........................................................................................................... 32 Organic coatings on mineral grains ............................................................................. 32 Pyrolytic carbon............................................................................................................... 33 Organic precipitates........................................................................................................ 33 DOM in soil water ............................................................................................................ 34 DOM compartments ................................................................................................................. 34 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 35 References .................................................................................................................................................. 35 iv Figures Figure 1. Lignin monomeric units. ........................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2. Lignin degradation pathways. ................................................................................................ 7 Figure 3. Cutin-forming acids. ................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 4. Model cutin monomeric unit according to Kolattukudy (2001). ........................................ 9 Figure 5. Hydrolysable tannin units. ..................................................................................................... 11 Figure 6. Ellagitannin formation. ........................................................................................................... 12 Figure 7. Nonhydrolysable tannins. ..................................................................................................... 13 Figure 8. Pathway for Rhodococcus erythropolis degration of (+)-(4R)-limonene according to van der Werf and others (1999). ............................................................................. 13 Figure 9. Formation of anhydro sugars. ............................................................................................... 15 Figure 10. Proposed mechanisms for photolysis of hydroquinone according to Joschek and Miller (1966) (Scheme I) and Richard and Grabner (1999) (Scheme II). ...... 18 Figure 11. Formation of benzotropolone rings according to Haslam (1998). ................................. 20 Figure 12. Auto-oxidation of pyrogallol (Haslam, 2003). .................................................................... 21 Figure 13. Possible oxidation reactions of thearubigins according to Haslam (2003). ................ 22 Figure 14. Thearubigin units according to Davies and others (1999). ............................................. 23 Figure 15. Formation of anthocyanin pigments (Salas and others, 2003). ...................................... 24 Figure 16. Proanthocyanidin oligomers............................................................................................... 25 Figure 17. Bicyclic and xythylium salt forms of flavene dimers. ..................................................... 26 Figure 18. Effect of pH on the structure anthocyanins. .................................................................... 27 Figure 19. First steps in browning reactions........................................................................................ 28 Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Natural Organic Matter (Humus) From a Consideration of the Chemical and Biochemical Processes of Humification By Robert L. Wershaw Abstract and sorption of hydrophobic organic compounds are depen- dent, to a large extent, on the amount of organic matter in a Natural organic matter (NOM) has been studied
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effects of Detritus Input on Soil Organic Matter Content and Carbon Dioxide Emission in a Central European Deciduous Forest
    Acta Silv. Lign. Hung., Vol. 7 (2011) 87–96 The Effects of Detritus Input on Soil Organic Matter Content and Carbon Dioxide Emission in a Central European Deciduous Forest a* b c István FEKETE – Zsolt KOTROCZÓ – Csaba VARGA – b b Zsuzsa VERES – János Attila TÓTH a Institute of Environmental Science, College of Nyíregyháza, Nyíregyháza, Hungary b Department of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary c Department of Land and Environmental Management, College of Nyíregyháza, Nyíregyháza, Hungary Abstract – A major objective of our research was to survey soil biological activity and organic matter content reduction in a Central European oak forest during treatments of various detritus inputs within the Síkf őkút DIRT ( Detritus Input and Removal Treatments ) Project. Beside the control, three detritus removal and two detritus duplication treatments were applied. Our examinations have proven that soil organic matter content declined relatively fast in detritus removal treatments. The reduction was especially remarkable in root detritus removal treatments, where – due to the lack of transpiration – soils were moister during the whole year than in the other treatments. The higher moisture content, despite of the reduction of detritus input, produced an intense soil respiration. This can be explained by the fact that decomposing organisms have increased the use of soil organic matter. Detritus input reduction had a significantly greater effect on soil respiration and organic matter content than detritus input duplication of the same extent. The latter did not cause any significant change compared to the control. litter manipulation / soil respiration / DIRT Project / humus content / climate change Kivonat – Az avarinput hatása a talaj szerves anyag tartalmára és szén-dioxid kibocsátására egy Közép-európai lombhullató erd őben.
    [Show full text]
  • Tannins: Current Knowledge of Food Sources, Intake, Bioavailability and Biological Effects
    S310 DOI 10.1002/mnfr.200900039 Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, S310 – S329 Review Tannins: Current knowledge of food sources, intake, bioavailability and biological effects Jos Serrano1, Riitta Puupponen-Pimi2, Andreas Dauer3, Anna-Marja Aura2 and Fulgencio Saura-Calixto4 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Depto. Nutricin y Bromatologa I, Madrid, Spain 2 VTT Technical Research Center of Finland 3 Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany 4 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientficas, Instituto del Frio, Depto. Metabolismo y Nutricin, Madrid, Spain Tannins are a unique group of phenolic metabolites with molecular weights between 500 and 30000 Da, which are widely distributed in almost all plant foods and beverages. Proanthocyanidins and hydrolysable tannins are the two major groups of these bioactive compounds, but complex tannins containing structural elements of both groups and specific tannins in marine brown algae have also been described. Most literature data on food tannins refer only to oligomeric compounds that are extracted with aqueous-organic solvents, but a significant number of non-extractable tannins are usu- ally not mentioned in the literature. The biological effects of tannins usually depend on their grade of polymerisation and solubility. Highly polymerised tannins exhibit low bioaccessibility in the small intestine and low fermentability by colonic microflora. This review summarises a new approach to analysis of extractable and non-extractable tannins, major food sources, and effects of storage and processing on tannin content and bioavailability. Biological properties such as antioxidant, antimicro- bial and antiviral effects are also described. In addition, the role of tannins in diabetes mellitus has been discussed. Keywords: Bioavailability / Diet / Hydrolysable tannins / Proanthocyanidins / Tannins / Received: November 27, 2007; revised: January 25, 2009; accepted: February 9, 2009 1 Introduction weight having the ability to complex strongly with carbohy- drates and proteins [9].
    [Show full text]
  • Fate of Organic Carbon in Paddy Soils – Results of Alisol and Andosol Incubation with 13C Marker
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 18, EGU2016-17404, 2016 EGU General Assembly 2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Fate of organic carbon in paddy soils – results of Alisol and Andosol incubation with 13C marker Pauline Winkler (1), Chiara Cerli (2), Sabine Fiedler (3), Susanne Woche (4), Sri Rahayu Utami (5), Reinhold Jahn (1), Karsten Kalbitz (6), and Klaus Kaiser (1) (1) Soil Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, (2) Earth Surface Science, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (3) Soil Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany, (4) Soil Science, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany, (5) Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia, (6) Soil Science & Site Ecology, TU Dresden, Germany For a better understanding of organic carbon (OC) decomposition in paddy soils an incubation experiment was performed. Two soil types with contrasting mineralogy (Alisol and Andosol) were exposed to 8 anoxic–oxic cycles over 1 year. Soils received rice straw marked with 13C (228 at the beginning of each cycle. A second set of samples without straw addition was used as control. Headspacesh of the incubation vessels were regularly analysed for CO2 and CH4. In soil solutions, redox potential, pH, dissolved organic C (DOC), and Fe2+ were measured after each anoxic and each oxic phase. Soils were fractionated by density at the end of the experiment and the different fractions were isotopically analysed. Samples of genuine paddy soils that developed from the test soils were used as reference. During anoxic cycles, soils receiving rice straw released large amounts of CO2 and CH4, indicating strong micro- bial activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractionation and Characterization of Natural Organic Matter from Certain Rivers and Soils by Free-Flow Electrophoresis
    Fractionation and Characterization of Natural Organic Matter from Certain Rivers and Soils by Free-Flow Electrophoresis GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1817-E Fractionation and Characterzation of Natural Organic Matter from Certain Rivers and Soils by Free-Flow Electrophoresis By J. A. LEENHEER and R. L. MALCOLM ORGANIC SUBSTANCES IN WATER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1817-E UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-600209 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. 20402 - Price 35 cents (paper cov«?r) Stock No. 2401-02400 CONTENTS Page Abstract ___________________________________________ El Introduction __________________________________ __ 1 Methods and materials __________________________________ 3 Sample preparation ______ _______ _ __ 3 Sample description _________________________________ 3 Separation procedure _______ ___________ __ 4 Assay of fractions ___________________________________ 4 Results and discussion _ _______________ 5 Conclusions ________________________________________ 12 References _____________________________________ __ 14 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURES 1-3. Graphs showing: 1. Organic-carbon and optical-density electrophoretic fraction- ation curves for organic materials from soil and from river water ___________________________ E6 2. Organic-carbon and polysaccharide electrophoretic
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Fraction of Organic Carbon RISC Nondefault Option
    Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Land Quality 100 N. Senate Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 GUIDANCE OLQ PH: (317) 232-8941 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Land Quality Determining the Fraction of Organic Carbon RISC Nondefault Option Background Soil can be a complex mixture of mineral-derived compounds and organic matter. The ratios of each component can vary widely depending on the type of soil being investigated. Soil organic matter is a term used by agronomists for the total organic portion of the soil and is derived from decomposed plant matter, microorganisms, and animal residues. The decomposition process can create complex high molecular weight biopolymers (e.g., humic acid) as well as simpler organic compounds (decomposed lignin or cellulose). Only the simpler organic compounds contribute to the fraction of organic carbon. There is not a rigorous definition of the fraction of organic carbon (Foc). However, it can be thought of as the portion of the organic matter that is available to adsorb the organic contaminants of concern. The higher the organic carbon content, the more organic chemicals may be adsorbed to the soil and the less of those chemicals will be available to leach to the ground water. A nondefault option in the Risk Integrated System of Closure (RISC) is to use Foc in the Soil to Ground Water Partitioning Model to calculate a site specific migration to ground water closure level. In the Soil to Ground Water Partition Model, the coefficient, Kd, for organic compounds is the Foc multiplied by the chemical-specific soil organic carbon water partition coefficient, Koc.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress and Challenges in Using Stable Isotopes to Trace Plant Carbon and Water Relations Across Scales
    Biogeosciences, 9, 3083–3111, 2012 www.biogeosciences.net/9/3083/2012/ Biogeosciences doi:10.5194/bg-9-3083-2012 © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and water relations across scales C. Werner1,19, H. Schnyder2, M. Cuntz3, C. Keitel4, M. J. Zeeman5, T. E. Dawson6, F.-W. Badeck7, E. Brugnoli8, J. Ghashghaie9, T. E. E. Grams10, Z. E. Kayler11, M. Lakatos12, X. Lee13, C. Maguas´ 14, J. Ogee´ 15, K. G. Rascher1, R. T. W. Siegwolf16, S. Unger1, J. Welker17, L. Wingate18, and A. Gessler11 1Experimental and Systems Ecology, University Bielefeld, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany 2Lehrstuhl fur¨ Grunlandlehre,¨ Technische Universitat¨ Munchen,¨ 85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 3UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany 4University of Sydney, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, 1 Central Avenue, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia 5College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 COAS Admin Bldg, Corvallis (OR), USA 6Center for Isotope Biogeochemistry, Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 7Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) PF 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany 8CNR – National Research Council of Italy – Institute of Agro-environmental and Forest Biology, via Marconi 2, 05010 Porano (TR), Italy 9Laboratoire d’Ecologie, Systematique´ et Evolution (ESE), CNRS AgroParisTech – UMR8079, Batimentˆ 362, Universite´ de Paris-Sud (XI), 91405 Orsay Cedex, France 10Ecophysiology of Plants, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universitat¨ Munchen,¨ Von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany 11Institute for Landscape Biogeochemistry Leibniz-Zentrum fur¨ Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e.V., Eberswalderstr.
    [Show full text]
  • Humus-Producing Materials and the Making and Use of Compost
    174 August, 1926 No seed of the Carolina clover is available commercially; but where it is abundant, seedheads can readily be gathered and scattered where wanted. Seed of the low hop clover is not to be had in quan- tity, but that of the least hop clover can be bought in England under the name suckling clover or Trifolium minus. It can also be had from certain seed dealers in Oregon, who clean it out of alsike clover seed; but the Oregon seed is usually quite foul with weed seeds and there is at present no information as to how these weeds will behave in the East. Seeding of all of these clovers should be done in early fall or late summer. Much of the seed of the Carolina clover is hard, so that if a quick stand is wanted a rather heavy seeding must be made. No experiments have been made with these plants, but in view of the small size of the seed it seems as though five pounds per acre of the hop clovers and eight pounds of Carolina clover should be enough. To insure even distribution it is well to mix the seed with sifted loam or sand. Humus-Producing Materials and the Making and Use of Compost By R. A. Oakley and H. L. 'Vest oyer Organic matter, or humus, as a constituent of soil, bears a very important relation to the growth of plants. This is a fact that was discovered by man early in his agricultural efforts. Just as he had a knowledge of the plants that were worth his while to grow, it is reasonable to suppose he early learned the difference between poor and productive soils, and what common substances he could add to them to increase their productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Extraterrestrial Organic Matter Relevant to the Origin of Life on Earth?
    IS EXTRATERRESTRIAL ORGANIC MATTER RELEVANT TO THE ORIGIN OF LIFE ON EARTH? D. C. B. WHITTET Department of Physics, Applied Physics and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A. (Received 19 August 1996) Abstract. I review the relative importance of internal and external sources of prebiotic molecules on Earth at the time of life's origin 3.7 Gyr ago. The ef®ciency of synthesis in the Earth's atmosphere was critically dependent on its oxidation state. If the early atmosphere was non-reducing and CO2- dominated, external delivery might have been the dominant source. Interplanetary dust grains and micrometeorites currently deliver carbonaceous matter to the Earth's surface at a rate of 3 5 7 10 kg/yr (equivalent to a biomass in 2 Gyr), but this may have been as high as 5 10 kg/yr (a biomass in only 10 Myr) during the epoch of late bombardment. Much of the incoming material is in the form of chemically inactive kerogens and amorphous carbon; but if the Earth once had a dense (10-bar) atmosphere, small comets rich in a variety of prebiotic molecules may have been suf®ciently air-braked to land non-destructively. Lingering uncertainties regarding the impact history of the Earth and the density and composition of its early atmosphere limit our ability to draw ®rm conclusions. 1. Introduction In at least one sense, a connection between the Universe at large and life in our small corner of it is inevitable. The hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and other elements that make up our bodies and other living things were created billions of years ago in the interiors of stars and, in the case of hydrogen, in the the Big Bang itself (see Trimble, 1997, in this volume for an eloquent review).
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Carbon 14 in Soils: a Review C
    Radioprotection, Suppl. 1, vol. 40 (2005) S465-S470 © EDP Sciences, 2005 DOI: 10.1051/radiopro:2005s1-068 Dynamics of Carbon 14 in soils: A review C. Tamponnet Institute of Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety, DEI/SECRE, CADARACHE, BP. 1, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance Cedex, France, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In terrestrial ecosystems, soil is the main interface between atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere and biosphere. Its interactions with carbon cycle are primordial. Information about carbon 14 dynamics in soils is quite dispersed and an up-to-date status is therefore presented in this paper. Carbon 14 dynamics in soils are governed by physical processes (soil structure, soil aggregation, soil erosion) chemical processes (sequestration by soil components either mineral or organic), and soil biological processes (soil microbes, soil fauna, soil biochemistry). The relative importance of such processes varied remarkably among the various biomes (tropical forest, temperate forest, boreal forest, tropical savannah, temperate pastures, deserts, tundra, marshlands, agro ecosystems) encountered in the terrestrial ecosphere. Moreover, application for a simplified modelling of carbon 14 dynamics in soils is proposed. 1. INTRODUCTION The importance of carbon 14 of anthropic origin in the environment has been quite early a matter of concern for the authorities [1]. When the behaviour of carbon 14 in the environment is to be modelled, it is an absolute necessity to understand the biogeochemical cycles of carbon. One can distinguish indeed, a global cycle of carbon from different local cycles. As far as the biosphere is concerned, pedosphere is considered as a primordial exchange zone. Pedosphere, which will be named from now on as soils, is mainly located at the interface between atmosphere and lithosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature and Dynamics of Soil Organic Matter: Plant Inputs, Microbial Transformations, and Organic Matter Stabilization
    Soil Biology & Biochemistry 98 (2016) 109e126 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Soil Biology & Biochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/soilbio Review paper The nature and dynamics of soil organic matter: Plant inputs, microbial transformations, and organic matter stabilization Eldor A. Paul Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory and Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499, USA article info abstract Article history: This review covers historical perspectives, the role of plant inputs, and the nature and dynamics of soil Received 19 November 2015 organic matter (SOM), often known as humus. Information on turnover of organic matter components, Received in revised form the role of microbial products, and modeling of SOM, and tracer research should help us to anticipate 31 March 2016 what future research may answer today's challenges. Our globe's most important natural resource is best Accepted 1 April 2016 studied relative to its chemistry, dynamics, matrix interactions, and microbial transformations. Humus has similar, worldwide characteristics, but varies with abiotic controls, soil type, vegetation inputs and composition, and the soil biota. It contains carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, phenol-aromatics, protein- Keywords: Soil organic matter derived and cyclic nitrogenous compounds, and some still unknown compounds. Protection of trans- 13C formed plant residues and microbial products occurs through spatial inaccessibility-resource availability, 14C aggregation of mineral and organic constituents, and interactions with sesquioxides, cations, silts, and Plant residue decomposition clays. Tracers that became available in the mid-20th century made the study of SOM dynamics possible. Soil carbon dynamics Carbon dating identified resistant, often mineral-associated, materials to be thousands of years old, 13 Humus especially at depth in the profile.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR)
    The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 1 Draft, Nov. 2007 The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) e. V., Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Objectives 4 2. Concept 5 3. Procedure and scoring tables 7 3.1. Field procedure 7 3.2. Scoring of basic indicators 10 3.2.0. What are basic indicators? 10 3.2.1. Soil substrate 12 3.2.2. Depth of A horizon or depth of humic soil 14 3.2.3. Topsoil structure 15 3.2.4. Subsoil compaction 17 3.2.5. Rooting depth and depth of biological activity 19 3.2.6.
    [Show full text]