DOCSLIB.ORG

Prediction of Soil Properties for Agricultural and Environmental Applications from Infrared and X-Ray Soil Spectral Properties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prediction of Soil Properties for Agricultural and Environmental Applications from Infrared and X-Ray Soil Spectral Properties Institute of Plant Production and Agroecology in the Tropics and Subtropics University of Hohenheim Field: Global Food Security Prof. Dr. Georg Cadisch (Supervisor) Prediction of soil properties for agricultural and environmental applications from infrared and X-ray soil spectral properties Dissertation Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree "Doktor der Agrarwissenschaften" (Dr.sc.agr. / Ph.D. in Agricultural Sciences) to the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences presented by Towett, Erick Kibet Born on October 3 rd 1981 in Kericho, Kenya 2013 This thesis was accepted as a doctoral dissertation in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree "Doktor der Agrarwissenschaften” by the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences at University of Hohenheim on 31/10/2013 Date of oral examination: 09/12/2013 Examination Committee Supervisor and Review: Prof. Dr. Georg Cadisch Co-Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Torsten Müller Additional examiners: Prof. Dr. Karl Stahr Head of the Committee: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Stefan Böttinger. i Contents Abbreviations and acronyms .......................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction to the thesis .......................................................................................................2 1.1 Background and rationale....................................................................................................2 1.2 Overview of soils in African context ...................................................................................3 1.3 Overview of the Africa Soil Information Service (AfSIS) project........................................6 1.4 Soil health and degradation .................................................................................................8 1.4.1 Major nutrient constraints............................................................................................9 1.4.2 Total versus plant-available nutrients.........................................................................10 1.5 Implications for food security............................................................................................11 1.6 Guidance approaches for agricultural and environmental management ..............................11 1.7 Promising methods for rapid soil assessment.....................................................................12 1.7.1 Infrared spectroscopy (IR).........................................................................................13 1.7.2 Total X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (TXRF) ......................................................14 1.7.3 X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)..........................................................................................15 1.8 The link between variability of soil properties and soil forming factors.............................16 1.9 Justification and opportunities...........................................................................................18 1.10 Hypotheses......................................................................................................................19 1.11 Objectives.......................................................................................................................19 1.12 Outline of the study.........................................................................................................20 1.13 References ......................................................................................................................21 2.0 Quantification of total element concentrations in soils using total X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (TXRF) .........................................................................................................28 2.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................28 2.2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................29 2.3 Materials and Methods......................................................................................................32 2.3.1 Sample selection and preparation...............................................................................33 2.3.2 Cleaning and preparation of TXRF sample carriers....................................................33 2.3.3 TXRF measurements.................................................................................................34 2.3.4 Pile-up peak correction..............................................................................................35 2.3.5 ICP-MS reference measurements...............................................................................38 2.3.6 Evaluation of TXRF method precision.......................................................................38 ii 2.3.7 TXRF method recalibration and determination of accuracy .......................................39 2.4 Results and Discussion......................................................................................................40 2.4.1 Comparisons of the analytical results after recalibration ............................................40 2.4.2 Evaluation of TXRF method precision.......................................................................49 2.4.3 Evaluation of TXRF method accuracy.......................................................................50 2.5 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................57 2.6 Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................62 2.7 References ........................................................................................................................62 3.0 Variability and patterns in total element composition of Sub-Saharan Africa soils using total X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy ........................................................................................67 3.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................67 3.2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................68 3.3 Materials and methods ......................................................................................................71 3.3.1 Study area and sampling............................................................................................71 3.3.2 Sample preparation and analyses ...............................................................................75 3.3.3 Detection limits of the elements.................................................................................76 3.3.4. Data analysis ............................................................................................................77 3.4 Results and discussion.......................................................................................................79 3.4.1 TXRF Method repeatability.......................................................................................79 3.4.2 Total element concentration in soil samples...............................................................80 3.4.3 Principal component analysis of total element concentrations....................................83 3.4.4 Elemental variation between and within site ..............................................................87 3.4.5 Restricted maximum likelihood analysis of the proportion of variance.......................93 3.4.6 Relationship with Mehlich-3 soil tests .......................................................................95 3.4.7 Relationship with mineralogy and other site characteristics .......................................98 3.4.8 Element concentration versus mineralogy composition plus site and soil-forming factors .........................................................................................................................103 3.5 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................105 3.6 Acknowledgement ..........................................................................................................106 3.7 References ......................................................................................................................107 3.8 Annex .............................................................................................................................111 iii 4.0 Combined mid infrared and total X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy for predicting soil properties .........................................................................................................................119 4.1 Abstract ..........................................................................................................................119 4.2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................120 4.3 Material and Methods .....................................................................................................121 4.3.1 Study area, soil sampling and processing.................................................................121 4.3.2 Spectral analyses method.........................................................................................122 4.3.3 Reference soil analysis ............................................................................................123
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolution of Loess-Derived Soil Along a Topo-Climatic Sequence in The
    European Journal of Soil Science, May 2017, 68, 270–280 doi: 10.1111/ejss.12425 Evolution of loess-derived soil along a climatic toposequence in the Qilian Mountains, NE Tibetan Plateau F. Yanga,c ,L.M.Huangb,c,D.G.Rossitera,d,F.Yanga,c,R.M.Yanga,c & G. L. Zhanga,c aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, NO. 71 East Beijing Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210008, China, bKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 11(A), Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China, cUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.19(A) Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China, and dSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853, USA Summary Holocene loess has been recognized as the primary source of the silty topsoil in the northeast Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The processes through which these uniform loess sediments develop into diverse types of soil remain unclear. In this research, we examined 23 loess-derived soil samples from the Qilian Mountains with varying amounts of pedogenic modification. Soil particle-size distribution and non-calcareous mineralogy were changed only slightly because of the weak intensity of chemical weathering. Accumulation of soil organic carbon (SOC) and leaching of carbonate were both identified as predominant pedogenic responses to soil forming processes. Principal component analysis and structural analysis revealed the strong correlations between soil carbon (SOC and carbonate) and several soil properties related to soil functions.
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Treated Wastewater Irrigation on Soil Salinity and Sodicity in Sfax (Tunisia): a Case Study"
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Érudit Article "Effects of treated wastewater irrigation on soil salinity and sodicity in Sfax (Tunisia): A case study" Nebil Belaid, Catherine Neel, Monem Kallel, Tarek Ayoub, Abdel Ayadi, et Michel Baudu Revue des sciences de l'eau / Journal of Water Science, vol. 23, n° 2, 2010, p. 133-146. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/039905ar DOI: 10.7202/039905ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 13 février 2017 01:03 EFFECTS OF TREATED WASTEWATER IRRIGATION ON SOIL SALINITY AND SODICITY IN SFAX (TUNISIA): A CASE STUDY Effets de l’irrigation par les eaux usées traitées sur la salinité et la sodicité des sols de Sfax (Tunisie): Un cas d’étude Nebil belaid1,2 , CatheriNe Neel2*, MoNeM Kallel3,
    [Show full text]
  • The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR)
    The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 1 Draft, Nov. 2007 The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) e. V., Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Objectives 4 2. Concept 5 3. Procedure and scoring tables 7 3.1. Field procedure 7 3.2. Scoring of basic indicators 10 3.2.0. What are basic indicators? 10 3.2.1. Soil substrate 12 3.2.2. Depth of A horizon or depth of humic soil 14 3.2.3. Topsoil structure 15 3.2.4. Subsoil compaction 17 3.2.5. Rooting depth and depth of biological activity 19 3.2.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Caracterización Fisicoquímica De Un Calcisol Bajo
    Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales Vol. 9 (49) DOI: https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v9i49.153 Artículo Caracterización fisicoquímica de un Calcisol bajo diferentes sistemas de uso de suelo en el noreste de México Physicochemical characterization of a Calcisol under different land -use systems in Northeastern Mexico Israel Cantú Silva1*, Karla E. Díaz García1, María Inés Yáñez Díaz1, 1 1 Humberto González Rodríguez y Rodolfo A. Martínez Soto Abstract: Changes in land use cause variations in the physicochemical characteristics of soil. The present study aims to quantify the changes in the physicochemical characteristics of a Calcisol in three land uses in the Northeast of Mexico: Native Vegetation Area (AVN), Cropland Area (AA) and Pasture Area (ASP). Four composite soil samples were taken at 0-5 and 5-30 cm depth from each land- use plot. The variables bulk density, texture, mechanical resistance to penetration, organic matter, pH and electric conductivity were determined. The analysis of variance showed differences in the organic matter with values of 4.2 % for AVN, 2.08 % for ASP and 1.19 % and for AA in the depth 0-5 cm. The texture was clay loam for AA, silty loam for ASP and loam for AVN showing differences. The soil under the three types of land -use presented low salinity (70.2 to 396.0 µS cm-1) showing differences at both depths. The soil hardness showed differences (p≤0.05) between plots. The AA showed lower values (0.78 kg cm- 2), contrasting with the values obtained for ASP (2.98 kg cm-2) and AVN (3.10 kg cm-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Organic Matter As Sole Indicator of Soil Degradation
    Environ Monit Assess (2017) 189:176 DOI 10.1007/s10661-017-5881-y Soil organic matter as sole indicator of soil degradation S.E. Obalum & G.U. Chibuike & S. Peth & Y. Ouyang Received: 27 July 2016 /Accepted: 7 March 2017 # Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 Abstract Soil organic matter (SOM) is known to play properties as well. Thus, functions of SOM almost al- vital roles in the maintenance and improvement of many ways affect various soil properties and processes and soil properties and processes. These roles, which largely engage in multiple reactions. In view of its role in soil influence soil functions, are a pool of specific contribu- aggregation and erosion control, in availability of plant tions of different components of SOM. The soil func- nutrients and in ameliorating other forms of soil degra- tions, in turn, normally define the level of soil degrada- dation than erosion, SOM has proven to be an important tion, viewed as quantifiable temporal changes in a soil indicator of soil degradation. It has been suggested, that impairs its quality. This paper aims at providing a however, that rather than the absolute amount, temporal generalized assessment of the current state of knowl- change and potential amount of SOM be considered in edge on the usefulness of SOM in monitoring soil its use as indicator of soil degradation, and that SOM degradation, based on its influence on the physical, may not be an all-purpose indicator. Whilst SOM re- chemical and biological properties and processes of mains a candidate without substitute as long as a one- soils.
    [Show full text]
  • GYPSISOLS, DURISOLS, and CALCISOLS
    GYPSISOLS, DURISOLS, and CALCISOLS Otto Spaargaren ISRIC – World Soil Information Wageningen The Netherlands Definition of Gypsisols Soils having z A gypsic or petrogypsic horizon within 100cm from the soil surface z No diagnostic horizons other than an ochric or cambic horizon, an argic horizon permeated with gypsum or calcium carbonate, a vertic horizon, or a calcic or petrocalcic horizon underlying the gypsic or petrogypsic horizon Gypsic horizon Results from accumulation of secondary gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O). It contains ≥ 15 percent gypsum (if ≥ 60 percent gypsum, horizon is called hypergypsic), and has a thickness of at least 15cm. Petrogypsic horizon The petrogypsic horizon z contains ≥ 60 percent gypsum z is cemented to the extent that dry fragments do not slake in water and the horizon cannot be penetrated by roots z has a thickness of 10cm or more Genesis of Gypsisols Main soil-forming factor is: Arid climate Main soil-forming process is: – Precipitation of gypsum from the soil solution when this evaporates. Most Gypsisols are associated with sulphate-rich groundwater that moves upward in the soil through capillary action and evaporates at the surface. Classification of Gypsisols (1) z Strong expression qualifiers: hypergypsic and petric z Intergrade qualifiers: calcic, duric, endosalic, leptic, luvic, and vertic z Secondary characteristics qualifiers, related to defined diagnostic horizons, properties or materials: aridic, hyperochric, takyric, and yermic Classification of Gypsisols (2) z Secondary characteristics qualifiers, not related to defined diagnostic horizons, properties or materials: arzic, skeletic, and sodic z Haplic qualifier, where non of the above applies: haplic Example of a Gypsisol (1) Yermi-Calcic Gypsisol (Endoskeletic and Sodic), Israel 0-2cm 2-6cm 6-21cm 21-38cm 38-50cm % gypsum 50-78cm % CaCO3 78-94cm 94-126cm 126-150cm 020406080 % Example of a Gypsisol (2) Yermi-Epipetric Gypsisol, Namibia Distribution of Gypsisols (1) Distribution of Gypsisols (2) Gypsisols cover some 100M ha or 0.7 % of the Earth’s land surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Wind Erosion in Ecological Olive Trees in the Tabernas Desert (Southeastern Spain): a Wind Tunnel Experiment
    Solid Earth, 7, 1233–1242, 2016 www.solid-earth.net/7/1233/2016/ doi:10.5194/se-7-1233-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Soil wind erosion in ecological olive trees in the Tabernas desert (southeastern Spain): a wind tunnel experiment Carlos Asensio1, Francisco Javier Lozano1, Pedro Gallardo1, and Antonio Giménez2 1Departamento de Agronomía, CEIA3, Campus de Excelencia Internacional en Agroalimentación, Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain 2Departamento de Ingeniería, Universidad de Almería, Almería, Spain Correspondence to: Carlos Asensio ([email protected]) Received: 12 April 2016 – Published in Solid Earth Discuss.: 29 April 2016 Revised: 27 July 2016 – Accepted: 28 July 2016 – Published: 22 August 2016 Abstract. Wind erosion is a key component of the soil degra- by other authors for Spanish soils. As the highest loss was dation processes. The purpose of this study is to find out the found in Cambisols, mainly due to the effect on soil crusting influence of material loss from wind on soil properties for and the wind-erodible fraction aggregation of CaCO3, a Ste- different soil types and changes in soil properties in olive via rebaudiana cover crop was planted between the rows in groves when they are tilled. The study area is located in the this soil type and this favored retention of particles in vege- north of the Tabernas Desert, in the province of Almería, tation. southeastern Spain. It is one of the driest areas in Europe, with a semiarid thermo-Mediterranean type of climate. We used a new wind tunnel model over three different soil types (olive-cropped Calcisol, Cambisol and Luvisol) and studied 1 Introduction micro-plot losses and deposits detected by an integrated laser scanner.
    [Show full text]
  • Seção V - Gênese, Morfologia E Classificação Do Solo
    EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS... 573 SEÇÃO V - GÊNESE, MORFOLOGIA E CLASSIFICAÇÃO DO SOLO EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FERRALSOLS AND RELATED SOILS(1) E. KLAMT(2) & L. P. VAN REEUWIJK(3) SUMMARY Morphological, physical and chemical data of 58 soil profiles of Ferralsols and low activity clay Cambisols, Lixisols, Acrisols and Nitisols and of Alisols of the International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC) collection, described and sampled in eighteen different countries of tropical and subtropical regions, were selected to analyse their consistency and, or, variability and to search for properties to better describe and differentiate them. The soil profile descriptions were based on the guidelines of FAO and the FAO endorsed analytical methods of ISRIC. Frequence diagrams of the data show an asymmetric positively skewed and leptokurtic distribution for sand and silt fractions, specific surface, exchangeable bases and cation exchange capacity. Clustering soil colour hues, values and chromas rendered four distinct clusters, respectively of Rhodic, Rhodic/Xanthic (Haplic), Xanthic and Humic properties. The same technique applied to particle size distribution also originated four clusters, respectively of fine loamy, fine silty, clayey and fine clayey soils. Most of the soils analysed are acid, with low base saturation, except for Rhodic Nitisols and Rhodic Ferralsols, which present low exchangeable aluminium. Higher and variable values of this property are found in the other soil classes studied. Cation exchange capacity is also low and related to the kaolinitic and oxihydroxydic composition of the clay material. Regression analysis applied to cation exchange capacity resulted in low correlations with clay and silt content and higher with organic carbon and specific surface and clay content.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Homogeneous Zones (Fhzs) in Viticultural Zoning Procedure: an Italian Case Study on 2 Aglianico Vine
    1 Functional homogeneous zones (fHZs) in viticultural zoning procedure: an Italian case study on 2 Aglianico vine. 3 4 A. Bonfante1*, A. Agrillo1, R. Albrizio1, A.Basile1, R. Buonomo1, R. De Mascellis1, A.Gambuti2, P. Giorio1, G. Guida1, G. 5 Langella, P. Manna1, L.Minieri2, L.Moio2, T.Siani2, F.Terribile2 6 7 1National Research Council of Italy (CNR) – Institute for Mediterranean Agricultural and Forestry Systems (ISAFOM), 8 Ercolano (NA), Italy 9 2University of Naples Federico II, Department of Agriculture, Portici (NA), Italy 10 11 *Corresp. author : A. Bonfante, Telephone +390817717325, Fax +390817718045, Email: [email protected] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 1 51 52 53 Abstract 54 55 This paper aims to test a new physically oriented approach to viticulture zoning at farm scale, strongly rooted in 56 hydropedology and aiming to achieve a better use of environmental features with respect to plant requirements and 57 wine production. The physics of our approach is defined by the use of soil-plant-atmosphere simulation models, applying 58 physically-based equations to describe the soil hydrological processes and solve soil-plant water status. 59 This study (ZOVISA project) was conducted on a farm devoted to high quality wines production (Aglianico DOC), located 60 in South Italy (Campania region, Mirabella Eclano-AV). The soil spatial distribution was obtained after standard soil 61 survey informed by geophysical survey.
    [Show full text]
  • (WRB) to Describe and Classify Chernozemic Soils in Central Europe
    244 C. KABA£A, P. CHARZYÑSKI, SZABOLCS CZIGÁNY, TIBOR J. NOVÁK, MARTIN SAKSA,SOIL M.SCIENCE ŒWITONIAK ANNUAL DOI: 10.2478/ssa-2019-0022 Vol. 70 No. 3/2019: 244–257 CEZARY KABA£A1*, PRZEMYS£AW CHARZYÑSKI2, SZABOLCS CZIGÁNY3, TIBOR J. NOVÁK4, MARTIN SAKSA5, MARCIN ŒWITONIAK2 1 Wroc³aw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Environmental Protection ul. Grunwaldzka 53, 50-375 Wroc³aw, Poland 2 Nicolaus Copernicus University, Department of Soil Science and Landscape Management ul. Lwowska 1, 87-100, Toruñ, Poland 3 University of Pécs, Department of Physical and Environmental Geography 6 Ifjúság u., 7624 Pécs, Hungary 4 University of Debrecen, Department for Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography Egyetem tér 1, 4002 Debrecen, Hungary 5 National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute Gagarinova 10, 82713 Bratislava, Slovakia Suitability of World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) to describe and classify chernozemic soils in Central Europe Abstract: Chernozemic soils are distinguished based on the presence of thick, black or very dark, rich in humus, well-structural and base-saturated topsoil horizon, and the accumulation of secondary carbonates within soil profile. In Central Europe these soils occur in variable forms, respectively to climate gradients, position in the landscape, moisture regime, land use, and erosion/ accumulation intensity. "Typical" chernozems, correlated with Calcic or Haplic Chernozems, are similarly positioned at basic classification level in the national soil classifications in Poland, Slovakia and Hungary, and in WRB. Chernozemic soils at various stages of their transformation are placed in Chernozems, Phaeozems or Kastanozems, supplied with respective qualifiers, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Classification Based on Spectral and Environmental Variables
    https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2019-77 Preprint. Discussion started: 20 November 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Soil classification based on spectral and environmental variables Andre Carnieletto Dotto1, Jose A. M. Demattê1, Raphael Viscarra Rossel2, and Rodnei Rizzo1 1Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture Luiz de Queiroz, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil 2School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia Correspondence: Jose A. M. Demattê ([email protected]) Abstract. Given the large volume of soil data, it is now possible to obtain a soil classification using spectral, climate and terrain attributes. The idea was to develop a soil series system, which intends to discriminate soil types according to several variables. This new system was called Soil-Environmental Classification (SEC). The spectra data was applied to obtain information about the soil and climate and terrain variables to simulate the pedologist knowledge in soil-environment interactions. The most 5 appropriate numbers of classes were achieved by the lowest value of AIC applying the clusters analysis, which was defined with 8 classes. A relationship between the SEC and WRB-FAO classes was found. The SEC facilitated the identification of groups with similar characteristics using not only soil but environmental variables for the distinction of the classes. Finally, the conceptual characteristics of the 8 SEC were described. The development of SEC conducted to incorporate applicable soil data for agricultural management, with less interference of personal/subjective/empirical knowledge (such as traditional taxonomic 10 systems), and more reliable on automation measurements by sensors.
    [Show full text]