DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Party Registration Decisions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Party Registration Decisions 2020 Party registration decisions Decisions by the Commission to approve or reject applied for party names, descriptions and emblems in date order. You can find the current registration details of the applicants by clicking on their name. An overview of the rules on registering a political party names, descriptions and emblems can be found here Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 30.12.2020 Abolish The Welsh Name Abolish The Welsh Wales Approve Assembly Party Assembly Party 30.12.2020 Abolish The Welsh Emblem Wales Reject Likely to mislead Assembly Party voters as the words spelt out in the emblem are unable to be read 30.12.2020 Abolish the Welsh Name Abolish the Welsh Wales Reject Same as an already Assembly Assembly registered party Party/Diddymu’r Parti Party/Diddymu’r Cynulliard Parti Cynulliard 17.12.2020 Vote YES-2-Scotland’s Name Vote YES-2- Scotland Reject Contains more than Independence Scotland’s 6 words Referendum Party Independence Referendum Party 1 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 15.12.2020 Alliance for London Description Alliance for England Approve London: Londoners First 15.12.2020 Alliance for London Description Alliance for England Approve London: the Londoners' Party 15.12.2020 Alliance for London Description Alliance for England Approve London: the London Party 15.12.2020 Alliance for London Description Alliance for England Approve London: London in Europe 15.12.2020 Alliance for London Description Alliance for England Approve London: Londoners in Europe 15.12.2020 Alliance for London Description Alliance for England Approve London: all Londoners Together 15.12.2020 Edlington and Name Edlington and England Approve Warmsworth First Warmsworth First 2 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 15.12.2020 Edlington and Description Edlington and England Reject Does not meet the Warmsworth First Warmsworth the requirements of a Forgotten Towns description 15.12.2020 Edlington and Description Edlington and England Approve Warmsworth First Warmsworth Residents First 15.12.2020 Edlington and Emblem England Approve Warmsworth First 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Name Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Description Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents Cranham 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Description Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents Elm Park 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Description Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents Hacton 3 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Description Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents South Hornchurch 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Description Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents St Andrew’s 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Description Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents Upminster 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Description Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents Emerson Park 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Description Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents St George’s 14.12.2020 Hornchurch and Description Hornchurch and All of Great Britain Approve Upminster Upminster Independents Independents Beam Park 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Name Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve 4 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Oldham 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Trafford 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Stockport 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Tameside 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Bolton 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Bury 5 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Manchester 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Salford 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Wigan 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Description Northern Heart All of Great Britain Approve (UK) Rochdale 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Emblem All of Great Britain Approve 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Emblem All of Great Britain Approve 14.12.2020 Northern Heart Emblem All of Great Britain Approve 6 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 23.11.2020 Conservative and Emblem All of Great Britain Approve Unionist Party 23.11.2020` Conservative and Emblem All of Great Britain Approve Unionist Party 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Name Vectis Party England Approve 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Emblem England Approve 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – For England Approve the Island 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – England Approve Proud of the Island 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – Stop England Approve over-development 7 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – England Approve Better healthcare now 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – England Approve Subsidise mainland hospital travel 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – England Approve Protect green feilds 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – For England Approve jobs and careers 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – Care England Approve for our elderly 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – For England Approve Vectis people 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – England Approve Supporting younger Islanders 8 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 23.11.2020 Vectis Party Description Vectis Party – Local England Approve control, local decisions 23.11.2020 Plaid Cymru – The Description Plaid Cymru - Plaid Wales Approve Party of Wales Cymru Newydd / Plaid Cymru - New Wales Party 11.11.2020 Ashfield Independents Emblem England Approve 09.11.2020 National Lion Name National Lion All of Great Britain Reject Application Democratic Party Democratic Party incomplete 09.11.2020 Shildon and Dene Name Shildon and Dene England Approve Valley Independent Valley Independent Party Party 09.11.2020 Shildon and Dene Emblem England Approve Valley Independent Party 9 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 09.11.2020 UK Independence Description Scrap The Senedd All of Great Britain Reject Does not meet the Party requirements of a description 09.11.2020 UK Independence Description Scrap the All of Great Britain Reject Does not meet the Party Assembly/Senedd requirements of a description 09.11.2020 UK Independence Emblem All of Great Britain Approve Party 18.10.2020 Buckinghamshire Name Bucks Residents England Approve Residents Association Association 18.10.2020 Buckinghamshire Description Putting Bucks England Reject Does not meet the Residents Association Residents First requirements of a description 18.10.2020 Buckinghamshire Emblem England Reject Likely to mislead Residents Association voters as the words spelt out in the emblem are unable to be read 10 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies to Registration Further decision Mark applied for applied for which part of the UK? decision information/ Reason for rejection 18.10.2020 Buckinghamshire Emblem England Reject Likely to mislead Residents Association voters as the words spelt out in the emblem are unable to be read 18.10.2020
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Democracy and European Emerging Values: the Right to Decide
    DEMOCRACY AND EUROPEAN EMERGING VALUES: THE RIGHT TO DECIDE COORDINATED BY GERARD BONA LANGUAGE REVIEW BY EMYR GRUFFYDD CENTRE MAURITS COPPIETERS 2015 Contents Foreword 6 Introduction 8 LAKE OR RIVER 14 THE POLITICAL CARTOONING OF CORNISH SELF-DETERMINATION 22 SELF-DETERMINATION AND WALES 44 TOWARDS SOVEREIGN FAROE ISLANDS 54 ABOUT TRANSYLVANIA 62 THE UDBYOUTH : HOW TO BE YOUNG, BRETON AND LEFT-WING WITHOUT AUTONOMY? 72 THE AUTONOMY GENERATION 80 SELF-DETERMINATION AND THE SILESIAN ISSUE 84 THE VALENCIAN COUNTRY AND THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION 96 LIBERTY FOR BAVARIA 106 SOVEREIGNTY TO BUILD A GALIZA WITH THE PROMISE OF WORK AND A FUTURE FOR OUR YOUNG PEOPLE 112 “UNTIL ECONOMIC POWER IS IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE, THEN THEIR CULTURE, GAELIC OR ENGLISH, WILL BE DESTROYED” 124 FLANDERS: ON THE ROAD TO BELGIAN STATE REFORM NUMBER 7 132 THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION IN THE CATALAN COUNTRIES: 146 THE RIGHT TO DECIDE OF THREE COUNTRIES AND THEIR NATION This publication is financed with the support of the European Parliament (EP). THE MORAVIAN RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION 154 The EP is not responsible for any use made of the content of this publication. The editor of the publication is the sole person liable. THE ROLE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN THE SELF-DETERMINATION PROCESS OF ARTSAKH 164 This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. THE YOUTH, PIONEERS IN THE SELF-DETERMINATION OF SOUTH TYROL? 178 This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information CENTRE MAURITS COPPIETERS 188 contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Party Registration Decisions-English Version
    2018 Party registration decisions Decisions by the Commission to approve or reject applied for party names, descriptions and emblems in date order You can find the current registration details of the applicants by clicking on their name An overview of the rules on registering a political party names, descriptions and emblems can be found here Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party All of Great Approve Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Scotland for Both Unions: All of Great Approve UK Europe Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Together we are all All of Great Reject Does not meet the requirements of strongest Britain a description 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Emblem All of Great Reject Confusingly similar to another Britain already registered party 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party of Northern Approve Northern Ireland Ireland 10.12.18 Ein Gwlad Name Ein Gwlad Wales Reject Application incomplete 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Future Shepton – Working England Approve together for Shepton 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description A fresh approach with Future England Approve Shepton 1 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which
    [Show full text]
  • Eagrán 15, Eanáir 2000
    An bhfanfaidh sí le RnaG? XSSN 1313-7SM3 | Oileáin Lofoten • Pápa Nua • Roadsigns • TG4 9 771393 724019 pobal forbairt teanga cultúr ag obair ar son phobal na Gaeltachta agus na Gaeilge Údarás na Gaeltachta Údarás na Gaeltachta Na Vorhacha, Gaillimh. Teil: (091) 503100 Facs: (091) 503101 Ríomhphost: [email protected] http:Hwww.udaras.ie Níor cl|p ¥ iifnaG riamh aon te<|ra lena mianta.. Leagí|mar béim ón tús , v ^ argÉhláracha den scoth.. ■' : Seo chugainn anois an saol úr digiteach. bhlóid Éabhlóid Revolution Evolution TG 4 Súil Eile http://www.tg4. ie San eagrán seo GLUAISEACHT? AN FHUINNEOG CÉN GHLUAISEACHT? Cuisle unearthes a diary of Tá sé in am tuairisc Uí summer skies in Lapland; Eithir ar staid na Gaeilge a Roadsigns point to Gaoth fhoilsiú, dar le hUinsionn B Dobhair; Seosamh Mac Mac Dubhghaill 6 Muirí makes a meal of Flahavans porridge oats, and internet censorship is CEANGAL NA gCUIG GALL this month's Cnámh CUISLE Cá bhfios nach fada go Spairne. 24 - 29 An tEastát Tionsclaíochta, mbeidh Alba agus an Casla, Bhreatain Bheag maraon Co na Gaillimhe le hÉirinn Aontaithe ina TG4 Teil: 091 572077 An Bóithrín Glas, DY2K, Facs: 091 572076 suí sa mBruiséil i measc Ríomhphost: cuisle@tinet.íe na náisiún? arsa Teaghlaigh, agus Ceol Seán Mag Uidhir 8-10 ó Theach na Céibhe 26 Eagarthóir: Diarmuid (ohnson TOGHCHÁN AN ÚDARÁIS EADRAINN Riarthóir: Líon na vótaí bosca ar Béarla ar RnaG; Fear Veronica Ní Ghríofa bhosca ó na cúigí ar gorm ina Phápa?; Dearadh: fad 12 Éamon O Cuív V Caomhán O Scolaí 091 572008 Bobby Molloy 32 C l ó c h u r : Jaycee
    [Show full text]
  • London Environment Strategy REPORT to the MAYOR on CONSULTATION on the DRAFT LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY
    London Environment Strategy REPORT TO THE MAYOR ON CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority May 2018 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Photographs © Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report CONTENTS 1 Executive summary 3 2 Introduction and background 7 What the strategy must contain 7 Draft strategy aims 7 Purpose of this report 8 Draft London Plan 9 3 Consultation process 10 The draft strategy consultation 10 Digital engagement with the draft strategy 12 Additional public engagement with the draft strategy 17 Technical stakeholder engagement with the draft strategy 18 How the consultation responses were analysed 19 4 Main issues raised, and proposed strategy changes 23 General 24 Air quality 36 Green infrastructure 55 Climate change mitigation and energy (CCME) 65 Waste 83 Adapting to climate change 100 Ambient noise 109 Low carbon circular economy (LCCE) 122 GLA group operations – leading by example 128 What can Londoners do to help? 128 Key performance indicators 129 Integrated Impact Assessment 130 5 Conclusions and recommendations 134 6 Next steps 135 7 Abbreviations 136 8 Glossary 137 9 Appendices 138 London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report 2 Appendix 1: Examples of the four campaign letters received as part of
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Dealignment and the Rise of the Minor Party at the 2015 General Election
    MEDIA@LSE MSc Dissertation Series Compiled by Bart Cammaerts, Nick Anstead and Richard Stupart “The centre must hold” Partisan dealignment and the rise of the minor party at the 2015 general election Peter Carrol MSc in Politics and Communication Other dissertations of the series are available online here: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/mediaWorkingPapers/Electroni cMScDissertationSeries.aspx MSc Dissertation of Peter Carrol Dissertation submitted to the Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science, August 2016, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the MSc in Politics and Communication. Supervised by Professor Nick Couldry. The author can be contacted at: [email protected] Published by Media@LSE, London School of Economics and Political Science ("LSE"), Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE. The LSE is a School of the University of London. It is a Charity and is incorporated in England as a company limited by guarantee under the Companies Act (Reg number 70527). Copyright, Peter Carrol © 2017. The authors have asserted their moral rights. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of the publisher nor be issued to the public or circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. In the interests of providing a free flow of debate, views expressed in this dissertation are not necessarily those of the compilers or the LSE. 2 MSc Dissertation of Peter Carrol “The centre must hold” Partisan dealignment and the rise of the minor party at the 2015 general election Peter Carrol ABSTRACT For much of Britain’s post-war history, Labour or the Conservatives have formed a majority government, even when winning less than half of the popular vote.
    [Show full text]
  • MK Manifesto 2015 Master Copy
    VOTE FOR CORNWALL … and a new approach to politics Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall Manifesto for the 2015 General Election VOTE FOR CORNWALL … and a new approach to politics Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall Manifesto for 2015 General Election MK POLICY STATEMENTS Mebyon Kernow - the Party for Cornwall is a modern and progressive political party. It is a party of principle, campaigning for a better deal for Cornwall and a fairer, more equitable World. We exist to fight for ALL the people of Cornwall, with a political programme that puts Cornwall first and offers an alternative to the London-based parties. We will play our part in building a confident and outward-looking Cornwall, that has the power to take decisions for itself. To achieve this, our detailed policies are founded on the core values of prosperity for all, social justice and environmental protection. CAMPAIGN PLEDGES 2015 For this election campaign, Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall is focussing on 12 key campaign objectives: Greater self-government for Cornwall Fair funding for Cornwall An end to austerity politics Decent public services for all A strategy for a sustainable economy A fair tax system Planning in and for Cornwall Affordable homes for local people A Climate Change Act for Cornwall A more just and peaceful World A reformed Europe Recognition for Cornwall Greater self-government for Cornwall Mebyon Kernow believes that the historic nation of Cornwall, with its own distinct identity, language and heritage, has the same right to self-determination as other constituent parts of the UK, such as Scotland and Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Although Many European Radical Left Parties
    Peace, T. (2013) All I'm asking, is for a little respect: assessing the performance of Britain's most successful radical left party. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(2), pp. 405-424. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/144518/ Deposited on: 21 July 2017 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 2 All I’m asking, is for a little Respect: assessing the performance of Britain’s most successful radical left party BY TIMOTHY PEACE1 ABSTRACT This article offers an overview of the genesis, development and decline of the Respect Party, a rare example of a radical left party which has achieved some degree of success in the UK. It analyses the party’s electoral fortunes and the reasons for its inability to expand on its early breakthroughs in East London and Birmingham. Respect received much of its support from Muslim voters, although the mere presence of Muslims in a given area was not enough for Respect candidates to get elected. Indeed, despite criticism of the party for courting only Muslims, it did not aim to draw its support from these voters alone. Moreover, its reliance on young people and investment in local campaigning on specific political issues was often in opposition to the traditional ethnic politics which have characterised the electoral process in some areas. When the British public awoke on the morning of Friday 6th May 2005 most would have been unsurprised to discover that the Labour Party had clung on to power but with a reduced majority, as had been widely predicted.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Sharing, Negotiated Settlements and the Logic
    REBELS WITH A CAUSE: POWER SHARING, NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENTS AND THE LOGIC OF PREEMPTIVE DEFECTION By Chelsea Blake Johnson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Leonardo R. Arriola, Chair Associate Professor Jason Wittenberg Assistant Professor Aila Matanock Professor Ann Swidler Fall 2015 © Copyright by Chelsea Blake Johnson 2015 All Rights Reserved Abstract Rebels with a Cause: Power Sharing, Negotiated Settlements, And the Logic of Preemptive Defection By Chelsea Blake Johnson Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Leonardo R. Arriola, Chair Why are some negotiated settlements successful at resolving intrastate conflict, while others fail? Are settlements involving agreement to share power more effective and, if so, why have conclusions about power sharing been so mixed? I theorize in this project that power-sharing guarantees improve the prospects for a peaceful settlement by reducing the stakes of winning post-conflict elections, thereby increasing the likelihood that rebels will willingly demobilize. Contrary to the preeminent model of bargaining for peace in the literature, I posit that the costs of complying with a negotiated settlement are asymmetrical. For rebels, compliance means forfeiting military capacity and bargaining power. In contrast, the government never concedes its monopoly on the use of force and, therefore, always retains the option of resorting to military action. Given this, and the risk of competing against an entrenched incumbent with an electoral advantage, it is a rational strategy for rebels to resist demobilization until expectations of future benefits are sufficiently high.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Forthe
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY MEMBERS OF THE FIRST ASSEMBLY 1989-90 SEPTEMBER 1990 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY FIRST ASSEMBLY LIST OF MEMBERS 1989-90 NAME PARTY BERRY, Mr Wayne Bruce ALP COLLAERY, Mr Bernard Joseph Edward Residents Rally Deputy Chief Minister, Attorney-General Minister for Housing and Community Services CONNOLLY, Mr Terry ALP DUBY, Mr Craig John Independents Group Minister for Finance and Urban Services FOLLETT, Ms Rosemary ALP Leader of the Opposition GRASSBY, Mrs Elinor Judith ALP HUMPHRIES, Mr Gary John Joseph Liberal Minister for Health, Education and the Arts JENSEN, Mr Norman Arthur Residents Rally KAINE, Mr Trevor Thomas Liberal Chief Minister, Treasurer KINLOCH, Dr Hector Gilchrist Residents Rally MAHER, Ms Carmel Anne Independents Group MOORE, Mr Michael John Independent NOLAN, Mrs Robyn Margaret Liberal PROWSE, Mr David John Liberal Speaker NAME PARTY STEFANIAK, Mr William George Liberal Deputy Speaker STEVENSON, Mr Dennis Ross Abolish Self Government WOOD, Mr Bill ALP NOTE: Mr Paul Whalan resigned his office as a Member of the Assembly on 30 April 1990 and Mr Connolly was chosen to fill the vacant office. BERRY WAYNE BRUCE MLA AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY ASSEMBLY SERVICE Elected 8 May 1989 COMMITTEE SERVICE Standing Legal Affairs (from 7 December 1990 to 1 May 1990) Planning, Development and Infrastructure (from 1 May 1990) Administration and Procedures (from 1 May 1990) PARLIAMENTARY POSITIONS Deputy Leader Shadow Minister for Health and Community Services
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Party Registration Decisions-English Version
    2019 Party registration decisions Decisions by the Commission to approve or reject applied for party names, descriptions and emblems in date order. You can find the current registration details of the applicants by clicking on their name. An overview of the rules on registering a political party names, descriptions and emblems can be found here Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies Registration Further information/ decision Mark applied for applied for to which part of the decision Reason for rejection UK? 17.05.19 Civic Party Name Civic Party All of Great Britain Reject Application incomplete 17.05.19 Liberal Democrats Description Liberal Democrats – All of Great Britain Approve To stop Brexit 17.05.19 Liberal Democrats Description Scottish Liberal All of Great Britain Approve Democrats – To stop Brexit 17.05.19 Liberal Democrats Description Welsh Liberal All of Great Britain Approve Democrats – To stop Brexit / Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru - i Stopio Brexit 17.05.19 The For Britain Description The For Britain All of Great Britain Approve Movement Movement For Brexit 1 Date of Applicant name Type of Identity The identity mark Application applies Registration Further information/ decision Mark applied for applied for to which part of the decision Reason for rejection UK? 17.05.19 The For Britain Description The For Britain All of Great Britain Approve Movement Movement For Wales 17.05.19 The For Britain Description The For Britain All of Great Britain Approve Movement Movement, For Scotland 17.05.19
    [Show full text]
  • Yougov / Welsh Barometer Survey Results
    YouGov / Welsh Barometer Survey Results Sample Size: 1009 Adults in Wales Fieldwork: 20th - 23rd January 2020 VI : Westminster VI : Constituency VI : List Past Vote 2019 EU Ref 2016 Plaid Brexit Plaid Brexit Plaid Brexit Plaid Total Con Lab Lib Dem Con Lab Con Lab Con Lab Lib Dem Remain Leave Cymru Party Cymru Party Cymru Party Cymru Weighted Sample 1009 282 249 34 91 23 244 225 147 26 225 213 135 26 272 310 45 75 380 418 Unweighted Sample 1009 292 274 39 97 19 252 251 154 23 230 245 148 23 292 360 54 86 443 413 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % WESTMINSTER HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION Westminster Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote, don't know, or refused] Con 41 100 0 0 0 0 99 3 6 14 100 2 10 20 95 1 14 7 15 72 Lab 36 0 100 0 0 0 1 95 23 0 0 95 23 4 1 83 22 1 54 14 Lib Dem 5 0 0 100 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 2 4 0 0 4 55 0 9 1 Plaid Cymru 13 0 0 0 100 0 0 1 66 0 0 2 62 0 0 8 2 88 18 5 Brexit Party 3 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 76 3 0 0 0 0 7 Green 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 7 3 3 1 Other 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 ASSEMBLY HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION: Assembly Constituency Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote, don't know or refused to answer] Con 36 93 1 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 98 2 4 10 88 2 13 5 13 63 Lab 32 2 85 7 3 4 0 100 0 0 2 93 8 4 3 71 17 4 47 17 Lib 5 1 2 80 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 4 47 2 8 1 Plaid 20 3 12 13 95 0 0 0 100 0 0 5 85 0 3 19 16 86 27 9 Brexit Party 4 1 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 86 4 0 0 0 0 8 Green 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • The Britons in Late Antiquity: Power, Identity And
    THE BRITONS IN LATE ANTIQUITY: POWER, IDENTITY AND ETHNICITY EDWIN R. HUSTWIT Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Bangor University 2014 Summary This study focuses on the creation of both British ethnic or ‘national’ identity and Brittonic regional/dynastic identities in the Roman and early medieval periods. It is divided into two interrelated sections which deal with a broad range of textual and archaeological evidence. Its starting point is an examination of Roman views of the inhabitants of the island of Britain and how ethnographic images were created in order to define the population of Britain as 1 barbarians who required the civilising influence of imperial conquest. The discussion here seeks to elucidate, as far as possible, the extent to which the Britons were incorporated into the provincial framework and subsequently ordered and defined themselves as an imperial people. This first section culminates with discussion of Gildas’s De Excidio Britanniae. It seeks to illuminate how Gildas attempted to create a new identity for his contemporaries which, though to a certain extent based on the foundations of Roman-period Britishness, situated his gens uniquely amongst the peoples of late antique Europe as God’s familia. The second section of the thesis examines the creation of regional and dynastic identities and the emergence of kingship amongst the Britons in the late and immediately post-Roman periods. It is largely concerned to show how interaction with the Roman state played a key role in the creation of early kingships in northern and western Britain. The argument stresses that while there were claims of continuity in group identities in the late antique period, the socio-political units which emerged in the fifth and sixth centuries were new entities.
    [Show full text]