DOCSLIB.ORG

Spring Conference 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spring Conference 2015 Spring Conference 2015 FINAL1 AGENDA 2 Green Party of England & Wales Agenda Spring Conference 2015 Green Party of England & Wales Agenda Spring Conference 2015 This is an interactive document please click on content headings, urls and Contents emails to connect Page 5 SECTION A Reports from party committees and bodies required to report to Spring Conference. Page 14 SECTION B Voting papers – revisions of complete chapters of Green Party Policy. Page 27 SECTION C Policy Motions - changes to party policy and statements on contemporary political situations. Page 47 SECTION D Organizational and Other motions – proposals about the way in which the party operates. Page 55 SECTION E Draft voting papers – these are included for discussion, and will appear for discussion and voting at a future conference. Page 74 OUT OF ORDER MOTIONS Motions which have been submitted, but do not meet the requirements for being included in the agenda. Page 80 PROPOSERS CONTACT DETAILS Page 81 APPENDIX 1 Proposed Disciplinary Standing Orders – associated with motion D4. Page 84 APPENDIX 2 The full original text of composited motions. 3 Green Party of England & Wales Agenda Spring Conference 2015 Green Party of England & Wales Agenda Spring Conference 2015 SPREAD THE WORD! These policy memes, and many other approved memes for sharing on social media, are available on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GreenPartyMemes and Twitter: https://twitter.com/GreenPartyMemes 4 Green Party of England & Wales Agenda Spring Conference 2015 Green Party of England & Wales Agenda Spring Conference 2015 SECTION A 18 passes, then amendment 19 will Adjustments to the agenda order of C automatically fall as they amend the motions. A01 Standing Orders same section and contain conflicting Motion C12 came 30th in the prioriti- Committee (SOC) Report clauses. zation ballot, but has been moved to Doug Rouxel, Convener of SOC Amendments 21 – 29 in Section B 12th on the agenda on the basis of have been placed in a single basket Section E, Subsection 3, part e clause iv Content of the Final Agenda of reorganizations. All of these of the Standing Orders for the Conduct amendments propose changes to the of Conference – “having regard to There is 1 fast track Voting Paper locations of the particular clauses of the previous Conference history of (Section B) which has 29 amendments policy without actually changing the motions and papers, including whether and 1 Draft Voting Paper (Section policies themselves and as such can all they have been submitted for debate E) at this conference. There are 36 be taken as a single block. The chair of previously.” policy motions (section C) with 7 the session should formally move that amendments and 15 organizational This will be the third time this motion conference accept these amendments and other motions (section D) with 7 has appeared on the agenda, and it as a basket, and then vote on the basket amendments. has consistently appeared very near itself. the bottom and never been discussed. 9 motions, or parts thereof and 2 Ordering of motions There are no other motions on the amendments have been ruled out of agenda where the same motion has order, and are listed at the end of the SOC has attempted to ensure that been proposed 3 times. SOC made the agenda. 6 motions were submitted the agenda and discussion that takes decision to move the motion to C12 to with insufficient signatures and are not place this conference is as streamlined ensure that due regard was given to included in the agenda. as possible whilst maintaining the the democratic mandate of the prioriti- democratic process which the party Composites, Baskets and zation ballot, but giving it a reasonable operates. SOC undertook discussions Consequentials chance of being heard as part of the with policy committee and conferences motions actually debated at confer- There are two composites on the committee about ways in which we can ence. agenda, these have been brought do this, and a number of suggestions together as they address similar parts have been implemented. The results of Adjustments to the agenda order of D of the Policies for a Sustainable Society this can be seen below. motions. (PfSS). They are C10, Gender Rights The Standing Orders for the conduct Motions D4 and D5 came 10th and Composite and C13, Democratic Reform of Conference state that SOC must 12th respectively in the prioritization Composite. The full text of the original conduct a ballot to assist in the prioriti- ballot, SOC has moved these higher up motions can be found in appendix 2 of zation of the motions; the precise the agenda on the basis of Section E, this agenda. format is not laid out. This conference Subsection 3, part e clause iii – “to give There are a small number of consequen- SOC undertook a ballot via the Borda special priority to any motion in section tial amendments, and a basket to the Count Method to produce an ordered d) which SOC considers to be urgent for Section B Fast Track Voting Paper. These list of motions in sections C and D. the resolution of controversy or for the are: The number of points which each continuing functioning of the Party or motion attracted in the ballot is shown any part thereof.” Amendments 7 and 8 – if amendment underneath the title in the agenda. 7 passes, then amendment 8 will With respect to D4, the proposal to Where motions were on the exact same automatically fall as they amend the implement a new disciplinary process number of points, the number of first same section and contain conflicting was proposed and passed at the spring preferences was taken into account to clauses. conference of 2013, where there was order motions. an instruction for GPRC to bring revised Amendments 9 and 11 of the Section 473 people took part in the online processes to the spring conference of B voting paper were proposed as a ballot, a significant increase from the 2014, as such, SOC felt that there was single amendment, but have been last conference where 173 people took sufficient reason to move this motion split to ensure that they appear in the part. up the agenda to ensure the continuing voting paper at the point where the functioning of the party in this regard. amendment takes place. These two SOC has taken due notice of the order amendments will be taken as a single of motions as identified by the prioriti- With respect to D5, there has been proposal, debate and vote. zation ballot, and used this order significant pressure on the Governance as the starting point for setting the Review Working Group to address the Amendments 13 and 14 – If amendment order of motions on the agenda. There question of delegate conferences, and a 13 passes, then amendment 14 will have however been a small number significant amount of energetic debate automatically fall as they amend the of situations where motions will now on the topic on and off the members same section and contain conflicting appear on the agenda out of their website. The structure and govern- clauses. prioritization ballot order. The details ance review is not able to address the Amendment 18 and 19 – if amendment of this are outlined below. question of delegate conferences as 5 Green Party of England & Wales Agenda Spring Conference 2015 Green Party of England & Wales Agenda Spring Conference 2015 per the requirements of the motion potentially slotted into the remaining Errors in the Agenda that set it up, however the party has business time for section A, B and D If you notice any errors in the final recently gone over the 25,000 member motions. agenda please notify SOC by emailing limit described – by almost 100%. In If there is any remaining business in - [email protected] light of this, SOC felt that the motion any section A, B or D plenary session, should be advanced up the agenda as Summaries and Synopses then the following motions will be the question needs to be addressed taken in the order they appear in the Conference Standing Orders state that fairly urgently. final agenda: all motions must be accompanied by a synopsis of not more than 50 words Assigning motions to specific plenaries C3 Providing free universal childcare in the timetable (300 for policy papers). If your synopsis C21 Proposed addition to Workers’ is more than 50 words (300 words for Section E, subsection 3, part a of the Rights and Employment Policy; policy papers), it will be cut by SOC. Any standing orders for the conduct of section on International Action instances in this agenda are identified conference outline that SOC, in consul- C22 Abolition of Employers’ National by the words “[excessive length, cut by tation with conferences committee, Insurance SOC]” after the truncated synopsis. can create specific subsections of the C27 ED030 Youth School agenda to be taken in specific plenary Original Text of documents proposed sessions. SOC has undertaken this in C34 Additional Policy on Producer for amendment Responsibility two ways. Based on feedback from members The motions that came first and second Fast Tracking at conference, SOC has attempted to in the prioritization ballot have been The following motions have been ensure that where a policy does not assigned the first slots in the two selected by SOC for fast tracking: appear in the motion in its original specifically identified C motion plenary format that the original text is included These will not appear for discussion sessions. This means that it will be as a note alongside it, or in an appendix, in a plenary, there is no workshop clear exactly which of the most popular depending on the length.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Creating Market Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries
    Creating Market Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries Creating Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries 2014 About the OECD The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Union takes part in the work of the OECD. Since the 1990s, the OECD Task Force for the Implementation of the Environmental Action Programme (the EAP Task Force) has been supporting countries of Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia to reconcile their environment and economic goals. About the EaP GREEN programme The “Greening Economies in the European Union’s Eastern Neighbourhood” (EaP GREEN) programme aims to support the six Eastern Partnership countries to move towards green economy by decoupling economic growth from environmental degradation and resource depletion. The six EaP countries are: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Republic of Moldova and Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Oil and Gas Industry Taxation
    OKLAHOMA OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY TAXATION Comparative Effective Tax Rates in the Major Producing States January 11, 2018 Oklahoma Oil and Gas Industry Taxation Contents I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Severance Taxes .................................................................................................................................... 4 Recent Tax Law Changes .................................................................................................................. 4 Oklahoma Severance Tax Payments ................................................................................................ 4 Oklahoma Effective Severance Tax Rate.......................................................................................... 7 Oklahoma Versus Other Producing States ....................................................................................... 8 State Trends in Severance Tax Rates ............................................................................................. 10 III. Ad Valorem Taxes ............................................................................................................................... 11 IV. Measuring the Broader Tax Contribution of Oil & Gas ....................................................................... 16 Personal Income Taxes and Oil and Gas Earnings ......................................................................... 17 Oil and Gas-Related
    [Show full text]
  • Ecotaxes: a Comparative Study of India and China
    Ecotaxes: A Comparative Study of India and China Rajat Verma ISBN 978-81-7791-209-8 © 2016, Copyright Reserved The Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC) is engaged in interdisciplinary research in analytical and applied areas of the social sciences, encompassing diverse aspects of development. ISEC works with central, state and local governments as well as international agencies by undertaking systematic studies of resource potential, identifying factors influencing growth and examining measures for reducing poverty. The thrust areas of research include state and local economic policies, issues relating to sociological and demographic transition, environmental issues and fiscal, administrative and political decentralization and governance. It pursues fruitful contacts with other institutions and scholars devoted to social science research through collaborative research programmes, seminars, etc. The Working Paper Series provides an opportunity for ISEC faculty, visiting fellows and PhD scholars to discuss their ideas and research work before publication and to get feedback from their peer group. Papers selected for publication in the series present empirical analyses and generally deal with wider issues of public policy at a sectoral, regional or national level. These working papers undergo review but typically do not present final research results, and constitute works in progress. ECOTAXES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA AND CHINA1 Rajat Verma2 Abstract This paper attempts to compare various forms of ecotaxes adopted by India and China in order to reduce their carbon emissions by 2020 and to address other environmental issues. The study contributes to the literature by giving a comprehensive definition of ecotaxes and using it to analyse the status of these taxes in India and China.
    [Show full text]
  • The Instruments of Trade Policy
    M09_KRUG6654_09_SE_C09.QXD 10/20/10 9:54 PM Page 192 chapter9 The Instruments of Trade Policy Part Two revious chapters have answered the question, “Why do nations trade?” by describing the causes and effects of international trade and the functioning Pof a trading world economy. While this question is interesting in itself, its answer is even more interesting if it also helps answer the question, “What should a nation’s trade policy be?” For example, should the United States use a tariff or an import quota to protect its automobile industry against competition from Japan and South Korea? Who will benefit and who will lose from an import quota? Will the benefits outweigh the costs? This chapter examines the policies that governments adopt toward interna- tional trade, policies that involve a number of different actions. These actions include taxes on some international transactions, subsidies for other transac- tions, legal limits on the value or volume of particular imports, and many other International Trade Policy measures. The chapter thus provides a framework for understanding the effects of the most important instruments of trade policy. LEARNING GOALS After reading this chapter, you will be able to: • Evaluate the costs and benefits of tariffs, their welfare effects, and winners and losers of tariff policies. • Discuss what export subsidies and agricultural subsidies are, and explain how they affect trade in agriculture in the United States and the European Union. • Recognize the effect of voluntary export restraints (VERs) on both importing and exporting countries, and describe how the welfare effects of these VERs compare with tariff and quota policies.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2014
    European Parliament Elections 2014 Updated 12 March 2014 Overview of Candidates in the United Kingdom Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 2 3.0 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: VOTING METHOD IN THE UK ................................................................ 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATES BY UK CONSTITUENCY ............................................ 3 5.0 ANNEX: LIST OF SITTING UK MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ................................ 16 6.0 ABOUT US ............................................................................................................................. 17 All images used in this briefing are © Barryob / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 / GFDL © DeHavilland EU Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. 1 | 18 European Parliament Elections 2014 1.0 Introduction This briefing is part of DeHavilland EU’s Foresight Report series on the 2014 European elections and provides a preliminary overview of the candidates standing in the UK for election to the European Parliament in 2014. In the United Kingdom, the election for the country’s 73 Members of the European Parliament will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014. The elections come at a crucial junction for UK-EU relations, and are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe: a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) could lead to a Britain that is increasingly dis-engaged from the EU policy-making process. In parallel, the current UK Government is also conducting a review of the EU’s powers and Prime Minister David Cameron has repeatedly pushed for a ‘repatriation’ of powers from the European to the national level. These long-term political developments aside, the elections will also have more direct and tangible consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Party Registration Decisions-English Version
    2018 Party registration decisions Decisions by the Commission to approve or reject applied for party names, descriptions and emblems in date order You can find the current registration details of the applicants by clicking on their name An overview of the rules on registering a political party names, descriptions and emblems can be found here Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party All of Great Approve Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Scotland for Both Unions: All of Great Approve UK Europe Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Together we are all All of Great Reject Does not meet the requirements of strongest Britain a description 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Emblem All of Great Reject Confusingly similar to another Britain already registered party 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party of Northern Approve Northern Ireland Ireland 10.12.18 Ein Gwlad Name Ein Gwlad Wales Reject Application incomplete 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Future Shepton – Working England Approve together for Shepton 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description A fresh approach with Future England Approve Shepton 1 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Tax and Price and Global Evidence
    Relationship between tax and price and global evidence Introduction Taxes on tobacco products are often a significant component of the prices paid by consumers of these products, adding over and above the production and distribution costs and the profits made by those engaged in tobacco product manufacturing and distribution. The relationship between tax and price is complex. Even though tax increase is meant to raise the price of the product, it may not necessarily be fully passed into price increase due to interference by the industry driven by their profit motive. The industry is able to control the price to certain extent by maneuvering the producer price and also the trade margin through transfer pricing. This presentation is devoted to the structure of taxes on tobacco products, in particular of excise taxes. Outline Tax as a component of retail price Types of taxes—excise tax, import duty, VAT, other taxes Basic structures of tobacco excise taxes Types of tobacco excise systems Tax base under ad valorem excise tax system Comparison of ad valorem and specific excise regimes Uniform and tiered excise tax rates Tax as a component of retail price Domestic product Imported product VAT VAT Import duty Total tax Total tax Excise tax Excise tax Wholesale price Retail Retail price Retail & retail margin Wholesale Producer Producer & retail margin Industry profit Importer's profit price CIF value Cost of production Excise tax, import duty, VAT and other taxes as % of retail price of the most sold cigarettes brand, 2012 Total tax
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party
    Royaume-Uni 73 élus Parti pour Démocrates libéraux Une indépendance de Parti conservateur ECR Parti travailliste PSE l’indépendance du Les Verts PVE ALDE l'Europe NI Royaume-Uni MELD 1. Vicky Ford MEP 1. Richard Howitt MEP 1. Andrew Duff MEP 1. Patrick O’Flynn 1. Paul Wiffen 1. Rupert Read 2. Geoffrey Van Orden 2. Alex Mayer 2. Josephine Hayes 2. Stuart Agnew MEP 2. Karl Davies 2. Mark Ereira-Guyer MEP 3. Sandy Martin 3. Belinda Brooks-Gordon 3. Tim Aker 3. Raymond Spalding 3. Jill Mills 3. David Campbell 4. Bhavna Joshi 4. Stephen Robinson 4. Michael Heaver 4. Edmond Rosenthal 4. Ash Haynes East of England Bannerman MEP 5. Paul Bishop 5. Michael Green 5. Andrew Smith 5. Rupert Smith 5. Marc Scheimann 4. John Flack 6. Naseem Ayub 6. Linda Jack 6. Mick McGough 6. Dennis Wiffen 6. Robert Lindsay 5. Tom Hunt 7. Chris Ostrowski 7. Hugh Annand 7. Andy Monk 7. Betty Wiffen 7. Fiona Radic 6. Margaret Simons 7. Jonathan Collett 1. Ashley Fox MEP 1. Clare Moody 1. Sir Graham Watson 1. William Dartmouth 1. David Smith 1. Molly Scott Cato 2. Julie Girling MEP 2. Glyn Ford MEP MEP 2. Helen Webster 2. Emily McIvor 3. James Cracknell 3. Ann Reeder 2. Kay Barnard 2. Julia Reid 3. Mike Camp 3. Ricky Knight 4. Georgina Butler 4. Hadleigh Roberts 3. Brian Mathew 3. Gawain Towler 4. Andrew Edwards 4. Audaye Elesady South West 5. Sophia Swire 5. Jude Robinson 4. Andrew Wigley 4. Tony McIntyre 5. Phil Dunn 5.
    [Show full text]
  • London Environment Strategy REPORT to the MAYOR on CONSULTATION on the DRAFT LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY
    London Environment Strategy REPORT TO THE MAYOR ON CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority May 2018 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Photographs © Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report CONTENTS 1 Executive summary 3 2 Introduction and background 7 What the strategy must contain 7 Draft strategy aims 7 Purpose of this report 8 Draft London Plan 9 3 Consultation process 10 The draft strategy consultation 10 Digital engagement with the draft strategy 12 Additional public engagement with the draft strategy 17 Technical stakeholder engagement with the draft strategy 18 How the consultation responses were analysed 19 4 Main issues raised, and proposed strategy changes 23 General 24 Air quality 36 Green infrastructure 55 Climate change mitigation and energy (CCME) 65 Waste 83 Adapting to climate change 100 Ambient noise 109 Low carbon circular economy (LCCE) 122 GLA group operations – leading by example 128 What can Londoners do to help? 128 Key performance indicators 129 Integrated Impact Assessment 130 5 Conclusions and recommendations 134 6 Next steps 135 7 Abbreviations 136 8 Glossary 137 9 Appendices 138 London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report 2 Appendix 1: Examples of the four campaign letters received as part of
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Dealignment and the Rise of the Minor Party at the 2015 General Election
    MEDIA@LSE MSc Dissertation Series Compiled by Bart Cammaerts, Nick Anstead and Richard Stupart “The centre must hold” Partisan dealignment and the rise of the minor party at the 2015 general election Peter Carrol MSc in Politics and Communication Other dissertations of the series are available online here: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/mediaWorkingPapers/Electroni cMScDissertationSeries.aspx MSc Dissertation of Peter Carrol Dissertation submitted to the Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science, August 2016, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the MSc in Politics and Communication. Supervised by Professor Nick Couldry. The author can be contacted at: [email protected] Published by Media@LSE, London School of Economics and Political Science ("LSE"), Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE. The LSE is a School of the University of London. It is a Charity and is incorporated in England as a company limited by guarantee under the Companies Act (Reg number 70527). Copyright, Peter Carrol © 2017. The authors have asserted their moral rights. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of the publisher nor be issued to the public or circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. In the interests of providing a free flow of debate, views expressed in this dissertation are not necessarily those of the compilers or the LSE. 2 MSc Dissertation of Peter Carrol “The centre must hold” Partisan dealignment and the rise of the minor party at the 2015 general election Peter Carrol ABSTRACT For much of Britain’s post-war history, Labour or the Conservatives have formed a majority government, even when winning less than half of the popular vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Challenges in the Digital Economy
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY TAX CHALLENGES IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY STUDY Abstract This paper analyses direct and indirect tax challenges in the digital economy in light of the conclusions of the OECD’s BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) Project. While assessing the recent reforms in the area of taxation within the EU and third countries, it revisits the question of whether or not specific measures are needed for the digital sector. Taking into account the recent scandals involving big digital companies and their aggressive tax planning practices in the EU, the specificities of the digital sector and the legal landscape in the 28 Member States, the paper makes policy recommendations for further tax reforms in order to tackle tax avoidance and harmful competition. This document was provided/prepared by Policy Department A at the request of the TAXE2 Committee. IP/A/TAXE2/2016-04 June 2016 PE 579.002 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Special Committee on Tax Rulings AUTHOR Eli HADZHIEVA, Dialogue for Europe RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Dirk VERBEKEN EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Karine GAUFILLET LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact Policy Department A or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in April 2016 © European Union, 2016 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • MK Manifesto 2015 Master Copy
    VOTE FOR CORNWALL … and a new approach to politics Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall Manifesto for the 2015 General Election VOTE FOR CORNWALL … and a new approach to politics Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall Manifesto for 2015 General Election MK POLICY STATEMENTS Mebyon Kernow - the Party for Cornwall is a modern and progressive political party. It is a party of principle, campaigning for a better deal for Cornwall and a fairer, more equitable World. We exist to fight for ALL the people of Cornwall, with a political programme that puts Cornwall first and offers an alternative to the London-based parties. We will play our part in building a confident and outward-looking Cornwall, that has the power to take decisions for itself. To achieve this, our detailed policies are founded on the core values of prosperity for all, social justice and environmental protection. CAMPAIGN PLEDGES 2015 For this election campaign, Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall is focussing on 12 key campaign objectives: Greater self-government for Cornwall Fair funding for Cornwall An end to austerity politics Decent public services for all A strategy for a sustainable economy A fair tax system Planning in and for Cornwall Affordable homes for local people A Climate Change Act for Cornwall A more just and peaceful World A reformed Europe Recognition for Cornwall Greater self-government for Cornwall Mebyon Kernow believes that the historic nation of Cornwall, with its own distinct identity, language and heritage, has the same right to self-determination as other constituent parts of the UK, such as Scotland and Wales.
    [Show full text]