DOCSLIB.ORG

General Election 2015 Candidate Views on Shooting Sports & Firearms Ownership

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Election 2015 Candidate Views on Shooting Sports & Firearms Ownership General Election 2015 Candidate Views on Shooting Sports & Firearms Ownership Firearms UK is an Association campaigning for the protection of firearms ownership within the UK. Primary objectives are to encourage unity and positive action within the shooting community and to promote and defend individual firearms ownership and the shooting sports. In the lead up to the 2015 General Election we canvased the parliamentary candidates for their views on shooting sports and firearms ownership. We sent an email questionnaire asking seven questions; 1. Do you believe in a total ban on private firearms ownership? 2. Do you believe that private firearms ownership should face greater restrictions? 3. Do you believe the current system is balanced/there is no need for change? 4. Do you support all forms of currently legal shooting in the UK? (If there are exceptions please state) 5. Would you oppose any moves to further restrict private firearms ownership/use in the UK? 6. Do you believe that our firearms laws are in need of reformation and sensible relaxation? 7. If you support UK citizen’s rights to participate in shooting sports do you also support changing the law to permit .22 rimfire pistols to be used for competitive shooting thus allowing ordinary UK citizens to properly train to enable them to compete in international events such as the Olympic and Commonwealth games? We obtained a database of candidate’s details from www.yournextmp.com. The database contained email addresses for 3361 of the 3969 candidates listed. Unfortunately, 183 of these email addresses were incorrect. We managed to correct some of these and sent a follow up email to the candidates. We received 180 “Read Receipts”. Five candidates replied but refused to answer any questions. At the time of publishing we have received 291 responses. The majority of responses were simple “yes”/”no” answers however some respondents wished to expand and clarify their answers in more detail. Some respondents decided not to answer any of the questions but to provide a paragraph or two explaining their views. As they did not answer the specific questions we have had to gauge their level of support of shooting on the response they provided and/or any accompanying documents they provided, e.g. party manifesto or policy. As this is our opinion of their response we may have not fully interpreted they comments correctly. If this is the case we would welcome clarification from the candidate. email: [email protected] Page 1 of 13 www.firearmsuk.org www.facebook.com/firearmsuk.org Version 8 General Election 2015 Candidate Views on Shooting Sports & Firearms Ownership Method of Scoring Scoring has been done using a red, amber, green method. Not supportive, Negative towards, wants further restrictions, “anti”, etc. Undecided, vague response, etc. Supportive, Positive towards, will oppose further restrictions, “pro”, etc. Updates, Errors and Omissions We will update this report as additional responses from candidates come in. If we have misinterpreted a candidate’s response or not recorded it correctly we would welcome candidates providing us with clarification so we can amend the report accordingly. Candidates should contact us at [email protected] Summary As expected the outcome was very mixed. There is a great lack of knowledge as to what shooting sports consist of. Amazingly, probably due to almost constant media misinformation, some believe that automatic firearms are generally available and need further restriction, some thought firearms were “banned” completely and others had no understanding of existing security requirements. Whilst we would not expect candidates to be experts in the subject, a basic idea of what forms of legal shooting is carried out in the UK would be appropriate. A number of respondents asked for more information. We did include a link to our website where they could have investigated further. Unfortunately a lack of resources at the time prevented us responding to all information requests, however we will endeavour to follow these up in due course. Some people responded with comments that they requested not to be made public, we will respect this. All of these comments were positive and “pro” shooting. It is a great shame that they didn’t want to share them publically. It was clear that some candidates thought we were another shooting organisation as they claimed to have previously replied to our “survey”. One person stated they tried to follow the link to our survey but it was “broken”. We did not include a survey link in our email. We did include our name in the introduction paragraph and within the email signature. There was also a link to our website. The majority of responses from SNP candidates were a copy and paste of a pre-prepared statement. The statement focused on Airgun Licensing, which is something we did not specifically ask about, although we do consider Airgun Licensing to have a negative impact of shooting. email: [email protected] Page 2 of 13 www.firearmsuk.org www.facebook.com/firearmsuk.org Version 8 General Election 2015 Candidate Views on Shooting Sports & Firearms Ownership Candidates who answered the questions Name Party Constituency Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question Mike Davies Alliance For Green Socialism Leeds North West Laurence Christian Party "Proclaiming Old Bexley and Sidcup Williams Christ's Lordship" Jeff Green Christian Party "Proclaiming Cardiff North Christ's Lordship" Helen Spiby-Vann Christian Peoples Alliance Hornsey and Wood Green Steve Hakes Christian Peoples Alliance Dewsbury Neil Wilson Conservative and Unionist Belfast East Party Liz St Clair-Legge Conservative and Unionist East Londonderry Party Alexander Conservative Party West Aberdeenshire Burnett and Kincardine Dehenna Davison Conservative Party Kingston upon Hull North Matthew Conservative Party Carshalton and Maxwell Scott Wallington Scott Mann Conservative Party North Cornwall David Nuttall Conservative Party Bury North Edward Conservative Party Inverness, Nairn, Mountain Badenoch and Strathspey Mark Garnier Conservative Party Wyre Forest Huw Bell Conservative Party North East Fife Kelly Tolhurst Conservative Party Rochester and Strood David Mowat Conservative Party Warrington South Edward Garnier Conservative Party Harborough Sarah Cockburn- Conservative Party Burnley Price Eric Ollerenshaw Conservative Party Lancaster and Fleetwood Roger Gale Conservative Party North Thanet Dominic Grieve Conservative Party Beaconsfield Sarah Downes Conservative Party Bassetlaw Simon Reevell Conservative Party Dewsbury David Allen English Democrats Doncaster North Stephen Morris English Democrats Monmouth Eddy Butler English Democrats Harlow Andy Brown Green Party Skipton and Ripon Ben Rice Green Party Carmarthen East and Dinefwr Benjamin Green Party North West Gravestock Leicestershire David Derbyshire Green Party North Somerset Geoffrey Barnes Green Party Gainsborough David Stevens Green Party Bradford East email: [email protected] Page 3 of 13 www.firearmsuk.org www.facebook.com/firearmsuk.org Version 8 General Election 2015 Candidate Views on Shooting Sports & Firearms Ownership Name Party Constituency Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question Tim Dawes Green Party Havant Martin Green Party Morley and Outwood Hemingway Murray Sackwild Green Party Harlow Richard Lawson Green Party Weston-Super-Mare James Doyle Green Party East Worthing and Shoreham Kris Wragg Green Party Bassetlaw Hugh Small Green Party Cities of London and Westminster Will Duckworth Green Party Dudley North Anna Widdup Green Party Epping Forest Derek Wall Green Party Windsor Janet Richards Green Party New Forest West Kevin Warnes Green Party Shipley Sarah Lunnon Green Party Stroud David Aherne Green Party Worthing West Craig Pond Independent Stoke-on-Trent North David James Independent Wirral West Ellie Merton Independent Walthamstow Sandy Pratt Independent East Surrey Paul Howard Independent Eastbourne Nick Yeomans Independent Brighton, Pavilion Matt Taylor Independent Brighton, Kemptown Mike Rigby Independent Taunton Deane Mike Scott- Independent North East Fife Hayward Huw Jones Labour Party South East Cambridgeshire Matthew Labour Party Loughborough O'Callaghan Rob Marris Labour Party Wolverhampton South West Sean Woodcock Labour Party Banbury John Clarke Labour Party Witham Bally Singh Labour Party Kenilworth and Southam David Drew Labour Party Stroud Ken Rustidge Labour Party North East Cambridgeshire Martyn Davis Labour Party Horsham Edward Browne Labour Party Harwich and North Essex George Howarth Labour Party Knowsley Stuart Roden Labour Party Truro and Falmouth Greg Mountain Labour Party Mid Sussex James Wright Labour Party Altrincham and Sale West email: [email protected] Page 4 of 13 www.firearmsuk.org www.facebook.com/firearmsuk.org Version 8 General Election 2015 Candidate Views on Shooting Sports & Firearms Ownership Name Party Constituency Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question Lloyd Russell- Labour Party Lewes Moyle Alan Bullion Liberal Democrats Sevenoaks Alisdair Calder Liberal Democrats Calder Valley McGregor Belinda Brooks- Liberal Democrats Cities of London and Gordon Westminster Brian Mathew Liberal Democrats North Wiltshire Elaine Bagshaw Liberal Democrats Poplar and Limehouse James Barber Liberal Democrats Dulwich and West Norwood Michael Beckett Liberal Democrats Scarborough and Whitby David Newman Liberal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Pipe Band Championships » Pg 14
    the www.scottishbanner.com Scottishthethethe North American EditionBanner 37 Years StrongScottish - 1976-2013 BannerA’ Bhratach Albannach ScottishVolumeScottish 36 Number 11 The world’s largest international BannerBanner Scottish newspaper May 2013 40 Years Strong - 1976-2016 www.scottishbanner.com Volume 36 Number 11 The world’s largest international ScottishA’ Bhratach newspaper May 2013 Albannach VolumeVolumeVolume 40 36 36 Number Number Number 3 11 The 11 The world’sThe world’s world’s largest largest largest international international international Scottish Scottish Scottish newspaper newspaper newspaper September May May 2013 2013 2016 The 2016 World Pipe Band Championships » Pg 14 Celts Exploring Celtic culture » Pg 26 Andy Australia $3.75; North American $3.00; N.Z. $3.95; U.K. £2.00 An Orkney tragedy-100 years on .. » Pg 7 Scotland in Budapest ...................... » Pg 10 Scott The first modern pilgrimage Scotland’s man of steel to Whithorn ........................................ » Pg 25 An artist’s journey round the Moray Coast ............................... » Pg 27 » Pg 12 The ScoTTiSh Banner By: Valerie Cairney Scottishthe Volume Banner 40 - Number 3 The Banner Says… Volume 36 Number 11 The world’s largest international Scottish newspaper May 2013 Editor & Publisher Valerie Cairney A Royal love affair with Scotland Australian Editor Sean Cairney Britain’s Royal Family have long had a love affair with Scotland. Scotland has played a role in EDItorIAL StaFF royal holidays, education, marriages and more. This month the Braemar Gathering will again Jim Stoddart Ron Dempsey, FSA Scot take place highlighting the Royal Family’s special bond with Scotland. From spectacular castle’s, The National Piping Centre David McVey events and history Scotland continues to play its role in shaping one of the world’s most famous families.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland's Snap Assembly Elections: Outcome and Implications
    CRS INSIGHT Northern Ireland's Snap Assembly Elections: Outcome and Implications March 7, 2017 (IN10663) | Related Author Kristin Archick | Kristin Archick, Specialist in European Affairs ([email protected], 7-2668) On March 2, 2017, voters in Northern Ireland—which is one of four component "nations" of the United Kingdom (UK) —went to the polls in snap elections for Northern Ireland's Assembly, its regional legislature. The Assembly is a key institution in Northern Ireland's devolved government, in which specified powers have been transferred from London to Belfast, as set out in the 1998 peace agreement aimed at ending Northern Ireland's 30-year sectarian conflict (in which almost 3,500 people died). The peace accord mandated that power in the devolved government would be shared between Northern Ireland's two dominant communities: unionists, or Protestants who largely define themselves as British and support remaining part of the UK, and nationalists, or Catholics who consider themselves Irish and may desire a united Ireland. (For more information, see CRS Report RS21333, Northern Ireland: The Peace Process.) Since 2007, Assembly elections have produced successive power-sharing governments led by the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) and the nationalist all-Ireland political party Sinn Fein. Assembly elections determine the composition of Northern Ireland's Executive, comprised of ministers in charge of policy departments. Following the May 2016 Assembly elections, DUP leader Arlene Foster and Sinn Fein's northern leader Martin McGuiness returned to head the Executive as First Minister and Deputy First Minister, respectively. Despite a much-improved security situation in Northern Ireland and progress in implementing important aspects of the peace accord, significant divisions and distrust persist between the unionist and nationalist communities and their respective political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • NEP Manifesto 2016.Pub
    Come and join us Let’s help North East England win Manifesto 2016 Why can’t we be treated just like Scotland? Why can’t the people of North East England have one of the ‘most powerful devolved Parliaments in the world’? Why shouldn’t the North East equally enjoy high rates of UK Government funding? Just over our border, our closest neighbours, our fellow UK citizens, already benefit from a democratically elected, devolved government which has power to run its own education, health and social care services and a great deal more. The Scottish Government can plan, invest, redevelop its economy and decide its own priorities leaving only a few functions – defence, foreign policy, immigration, in the hands of the UK. With generous public finances the school children of Coldstream, Jedburgh, Dunbar are able to look forward to free Higher Education, older people in need of long term care do not have to make any financial contribution and prescriptions are free. Literally, one step to the south, if the public finances of North East England were governed by the same formula we would have more than £1billion per annum extra to spend in our region. Instead, our public services are already being decimated and are about to be utterly shredded through the removal of Government financial support and the requirement that this, the poorest, most highly Council Taxed region in England makes up the deficit through further tax rises and by taking responsibility for raising income from business rates. The grotesque unfairness of this developing situation is further emphasised by the collusion of Labour Council leaders, Labour and Conservative MPs and a few members of the North East business elite in a form of ‘devolution’ which is nothing of the sort and would be treated with derisive contempt in Edinburgh, Cardiff, or Belfast.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Election 2011 – Campaign Expenditure
    Scottish Parliament election 2011 – campaign expenditure Contents Table 1: Summary of spending at the Scottish Parliament election 1 2011 Table 2: Total spend at the 2003, 2007 and 2011 Scottish 2 Parliament elections by party Chart 1: Total spend at the 2003, 2007 and 2011 Scottish 2 Parliament elections by party Table 3: Total spend at the Scottish Parliament election 2011 by 3 category Chart 2: Total spend at the Scottish Parliament election 2011 by 4 category Table 4: Total spend at the 2003, 2007 and 2011 Scottish 5 Parliament elections by party and category Chart 3: Total spend at the 2003, 2007 and 2011 Scottish 6 Parliament elections by category Chart 4: Total spend at the 2003, 2007 and 2011 Scottish 7 Parliament elections by party and category Glossary 8 Scottish Parliament election 2011 – campaign expenditure Table 1: Summary of spending at the Scottish Parliament election 2011 Regions Constituencies Spending Payments Notional Party name contested contested limit made expenditure Total All Scotland Pensioners Party 8 2 £664,000 £12,034 £0 £12,034 Angus Independents Representatives (AIR) 1 1 £92,000 £1,699 £0 £1,699 Ban Bankers Bonuses 2 0 £160,000 £4,254 £275 £4,529 British National Party 8 0 £640,000 £9,379 £400 £9,779 Christian Party "Proclaiming Christ's Lordship 8 2 £664,000 £352 £0 £352 Christian People's Alliance 2 0 £160,000 £988 £0 £988 Communist Party of Britain 0 1 £12,000 £0 £0 £0 Conservative and Unionist Party 8 73 £1,516,000 £256,610 £16,852 £273,462 Co-operative Party 0 11 £132,000 £1,865 £0 £1,865 Labour Party
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2014
    European Parliament Elections 2014 Updated 12 March 2014 Overview of Candidates in the United Kingdom Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................. 2 3.0 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS: VOTING METHOD IN THE UK ................................................................ 3 4.0 PRELIMINARY OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATES BY UK CONSTITUENCY ............................................ 3 5.0 ANNEX: LIST OF SITTING UK MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ................................ 16 6.0 ABOUT US ............................................................................................................................. 17 All images used in this briefing are © Barryob / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0 / GFDL © DeHavilland EU Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. 1 | 18 European Parliament Elections 2014 1.0 Introduction This briefing is part of DeHavilland EU’s Foresight Report series on the 2014 European elections and provides a preliminary overview of the candidates standing in the UK for election to the European Parliament in 2014. In the United Kingdom, the election for the country’s 73 Members of the European Parliament will be held on Thursday 22 May 2014. The elections come at a crucial junction for UK-EU relations, and are likely to have far-reaching consequences for the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe: a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) could lead to a Britain that is increasingly dis-engaged from the EU policy-making process. In parallel, the current UK Government is also conducting a review of the EU’s powers and Prime Minister David Cameron has repeatedly pushed for a ‘repatriation’ of powers from the European to the national level. These long-term political developments aside, the elections will also have more direct and tangible consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Parties and Individual Candidates Nominated
    European Parliamentary Election for the South West Region - 4th June 2009 STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES NOMINATED 1. The following parties and individual candidates have been and stand nominated: British National Jeremy Edward Barry John Sinclair Adrian Llewellyn Romilly Sean Derrick Twitchin Lawrence Reginald West Peryn Walter Parsons Wotherspoon Bennett 66 College Avenue, 15 Autumn Road, Poole, 27 Lutyens Drive, 12 Simons Close, Worle, Party British National 15 Tremlett Grove, 64 Castlemain Avenue, Mutley, Plymouth Dorset BH11 8TF Paignton, Devon Weston super Mare, Party - Protecting Ipplepen, Newton Abbot, Southbourne, Bournemouth , PL4 7AP TQ3 3LA North Somerset British Jobs Devon TQ12 5BZ Dorset BH6 5EN BS22 6DJ Christian Party William Patrick Capstick Katherine Susan Mills Diana Ama Ofori Larna Jane Martin Peter Vickers Adenike Williams 38 Winton Avenue, 7 Wellington Road, 32 New Plaistow Road, 27 Clonmore Street, 96 Blaker Court, 5 Hensley Point, "Proclaiming London Wanstead, London Stratford, London Southfield, London Fairlawn, London Bradstock Road, Christ's Lordship" N11 2AT E11 2AN E15 3JB SW18 5EU SE7 7ET London E9 5BE The Christian Party - CPA Conservative Giles Bryan Chichester Julie McCulloch Girling Ashley Peter Fox Michael John Edward Donald John Collier Syeda Zehra Zaidi Longridge, West Hill, The Knapp, Dovers Hill, 77 Park Grove, Henleaze, Dolley 22 Douglas Road, Poole, Nupend Lodge, Nupend Party Ottery St Mary, Devon Chipping Campden, Bristol BS9 4NY Leeside, West Street, Dorset BH12 2AX Lane, Longhope,
    [Show full text]
  • March Newsletter
    Founding editor, Kinross Newsletter Mrs Nan Walker, MBE Founded in 1977 by Kinross Community Council ISSN 1757-4781 Published by Kinross Newsletter Limited, Company No. SC374361 Issue No 493 All profits given away to local good causes by The Kinross Community Council Newsletter, Charitable Company No. SC040913 www.kinrossnewsletter.org www.facebook.com/kinrossnewsletter March 2021 DEADLINE CONTENTS for the April Issue From the Editor ........................................................................... 2 Thanks & Congratulations .......................................................... 3 5pm, Letters ......................................................................................... 4 Friday 12 March 2021 News ........................................................................................... 7 for publication on Church News ............................................................................. 25 Politicians .................................................................................. 26 Saturday 27 March 2021 Police Box .................................................................................. 32 Features .................................................................................... 35 Contributions For Inclusion Health and Wellbeing ................................................................ 43 In The Newsletter Emergency Contact Numbers .................................................... 46 Community Councils ................................................................. 49 The
    [Show full text]
  • Revalidating Participation: Power and Pre - Figurative Politics Within Contemporary Leftwing Movements
    Bart Cammaerts Revalidating participation: power and pre - figurative politics within contemporary leftwing movements Book section Original citation: Cammaerts, Bart (2019) Revalidating participation: power and pre -figurative politics within contemporary leftwing movements. In: Carpentier, Nico, (ed.) Respublika!: Experiments in the performance of participation and democracy. NeMe, Limassol, Cyprus, pp. 126-137. ISBN 9789963969586 © 2019 The Author This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/91502 Available in LSE Research Online: January 2019 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors a nd/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL ( http://eprints.lse.ac.uk ) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this ve rsion and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Revalidating Participation: Power and Pre-Figurative Politics within Contemporary Leftwing Movements 1 Bart Cammaerts London School of Economics and Political Science Introduction ‘Practice what you preach’ is a popular idiom not only within progressive politics, but also beyond, and this idea is also encapsulated in the famous Mahatma Gandhi quote: ‘If you want to change the world, start with yourself’.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party
    Royaume-Uni 73 élus Parti pour Démocrates libéraux Une indépendance de Parti conservateur ECR Parti travailliste PSE l’indépendance du Les Verts PVE ALDE l'Europe NI Royaume-Uni MELD 1. Vicky Ford MEP 1. Richard Howitt MEP 1. Andrew Duff MEP 1. Patrick O’Flynn 1. Paul Wiffen 1. Rupert Read 2. Geoffrey Van Orden 2. Alex Mayer 2. Josephine Hayes 2. Stuart Agnew MEP 2. Karl Davies 2. Mark Ereira-Guyer MEP 3. Sandy Martin 3. Belinda Brooks-Gordon 3. Tim Aker 3. Raymond Spalding 3. Jill Mills 3. David Campbell 4. Bhavna Joshi 4. Stephen Robinson 4. Michael Heaver 4. Edmond Rosenthal 4. Ash Haynes East of England Bannerman MEP 5. Paul Bishop 5. Michael Green 5. Andrew Smith 5. Rupert Smith 5. Marc Scheimann 4. John Flack 6. Naseem Ayub 6. Linda Jack 6. Mick McGough 6. Dennis Wiffen 6. Robert Lindsay 5. Tom Hunt 7. Chris Ostrowski 7. Hugh Annand 7. Andy Monk 7. Betty Wiffen 7. Fiona Radic 6. Margaret Simons 7. Jonathan Collett 1. Ashley Fox MEP 1. Clare Moody 1. Sir Graham Watson 1. William Dartmouth 1. David Smith 1. Molly Scott Cato 2. Julie Girling MEP 2. Glyn Ford MEP MEP 2. Helen Webster 2. Emily McIvor 3. James Cracknell 3. Ann Reeder 2. Kay Barnard 2. Julia Reid 3. Mike Camp 3. Ricky Knight 4. Georgina Butler 4. Hadleigh Roberts 3. Brian Mathew 3. Gawain Towler 4. Andrew Edwards 4. Audaye Elesady South West 5. Sophia Swire 5. Jude Robinson 4. Andrew Wigley 4. Tony McIntyre 5. Phil Dunn 5.
    [Show full text]
  • C (1003-1005) D (1006-1011)
    B Country code (1001-1002) EB81.3 B C our survey number (1003-1005) EB81.3 C D Interview number (1006-1011) EB81.3 D D11: NO "NO ANSWER" ALLOWED D11 How old are you? (1012-1013) EB81.3 D11 EB0817UKXTRA 1/44 3/06/2014 ASK THE WHOLE QUESTIONNAIRE ONLY IF LEGALLY ABLE TO VOTE (18+ EXCEPT 16+ IN AT) Q1: CODE 29 CANNOT BE THE ONLY ANSWER OTHERWISE CLOSE THE INTERVIEW Q1: CODE 30 IS EXCLUSIVE Q1: IF CODE 30 THEN CLOSE INTERVIEW Q1 What is your nationality? Please tell me the country(ies) that applies(y). (MULTIPLE ANSWERS POSSIBLE) (1034-1063) Belgium 1, Denmark 2, Germany 3, Greece 4, Spain 5, France 6, Ireland 7, Italy 8, Luxembourg 9, Netherlands 10, Portugal 11, United Kingdom (Great Britain, Northern Ireland) 12, Austria 13, Sweden 14, Finland 15, Republic of Cyprus 16, Czech Republic 17, Estonia 18, Hungary 19, Latvia 20, Lithuania 21, Malta 22, Poland 23, Slovakia 24, Slovenia 25, Bulgaria 26, Romania 27, Croatia 28, Other countries 29, DK 30, EB81.3 Q1 EB0817UKXTRA 2/44 3/06/2014 QP1 The European Parliament elections were held on the 22nd May 2014. For one reason or another, some people in the UK did not vote in these elections. Did you vote in the recent European Parliament elections? (SHOW SCREEN - SINGLE CODE) (1064) Voted 1 Did not vote 2 DK 3 EB71.3 QK1 EB0817UKXTRA 3/44 3/06/2014 ASK QP2 TO QP5a IF "VOTED", CODE 1 IN QP1 – OTHERS GO TO QP3b QP2 Which party did you vote for in the European Parliament elections? (SHOW SCREEN – READ OUT – SINGLE CODE) (1065-1066) Sinn Féin (SF) 1 Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) 2 Ulster Unionist Party
    [Show full text]
  • Britishness, What It Is and What It Could Be, Is
    COUNTY, NATION, ETHNIC GROUP? THE SHAPING OF THE CORNISH IDENTITY Bernard Deacon If English regionalism is the dog that never barked then English regional history has in recent years been barely able to raise much more than a whimper.1 Regional history in Britain enjoyed its heyday between the late 1970s and late1990s but now looks increasingly threadbare when contrasted with the work of regional geographers. Like geographers, in earlier times regional historians busied themselves with two activities. First, they set out to describe social processes and structures at a regional level. The region, it was claimed, was the most convenient container for studying ‘patterns of historical development across large tracts of the English countryside’ and understanding the interconnections between social, economic, political, demographic and administrative history, enabling the researcher to transcend both the hyper-specialization of ‘national’ historical studies and the parochial and inward-looking gaze of English local history.2 Second, and occurring in parallel, was a search for the best boundaries within which to pursue this multi-disciplinary quest. Although he explicitly rejected the concept of region on the grounds that it was impossible comprehensively to define the term, in many ways the work of Charles Phythian-Adams was the culmination of this process of categorization. Phythian-Adams proposed a series of cultural provinces, supra-county entities based on watersheds and river basins, as broad containers for human activity in the early modern period. Within these, ‘local societies’ linked together communities or localities via networks of kinship and lineage. 3 But regions are not just convenient containers for academic analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments in the Performance of Participation and Democracy
    Respublika! Experiments in the performance of participation and democracy edited by Nico Carpentier 1 2 3 Publisher NeMe, Cyprus, 2019 www.neme.org © 2019 NeMe Design by Natalie Demetriou, ndLine. Printed in Cyprus by Lithografica ISBN 978-9963-9695-8-6 Copyright for all texts and images remains with original artists and authors Respublika! A Cypriot community media arts festival was realised with the kind support from: main funder other funders in collaboration with support Further support has been provided by: CUTradio, Hoi Polloi (Simon Bahceli), Home for Cooperation, IKME Sociopolitical Studies Institute, Join2Media, KEY-Innovation in Culture, Education and Youth, Materia (Sotia Nicolaou and Marina Polycarpou), MYCYradio, Old Nicosia Revealed, Studio 21 (Dervish Zeybek), Uppsala Stadsteater, Chystalleni Loizidou, Evi Tselika, Anastasia Demosthenous, Angeliki Gazi, Hack66, Limassol Hacker Space, and Lefkosia Hacker Space. Respublika! Experiments in the performance of participation and democracy edited by Nico Carpentier viii Contents Foreword xv An Introduction to Respublika! Experiments in the Performance of 3 Participation and Democracy Nico Carpentier Part I: Participations 14 Introduction to Participations 17 Nico Carpentier Community Media as Rhizome 19 Nico Carpentier The Art of Community Media Organisations 29 Nico Carpentier Shaking the Airwaves: Participatory Radio Practices 34 Helen Hahmann Life:Moving 42 Briony Campbell and the Life:Moving participants and project team Life:Moving - The Six Participants 47 Briony Campbell
    [Show full text]