DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Party Registration Decisions-English Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Party Registration Decisions-English Version 2018 Party registration decisions Decisions by the Commission to approve or reject applied for party names, descriptions and emblems in date order You can find the current registration details of the applicants by clicking on their name An overview of the rules on registering a political party names, descriptions and emblems can be found here Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party All of Great Approve Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Scotland for Both Unions: All of Great Approve UK Europe Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Together we are all All of Great Reject Does not meet the requirements of strongest Britain a description 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Emblem All of Great Reject Confusingly similar to another Britain already registered party 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party of Northern Approve Northern Ireland Ireland 10.12.18 Ein Gwlad Name Ein Gwlad Wales Reject Application incomplete 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Future Shepton – Working England Approve together for Shepton 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description A fresh approach with Future England Approve Shepton 1 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Future Shepton – a new England Approve approach 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Putting Shepton first with England Approve Future Shepton 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Future Shepton – Putting England Approve Shepton First 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Future Shepton – better England Approve ways of working 10.12.18 Net Tax Payers Consent Name Net Tax Payers Consent England Approve Party Party 10.12.18 South Woodham Ferrers Name South Woodham Ferrers England Reject Application incomplete Independents Council Taxpayers Association 10.12.18 UK Independence Party Description UKIP Leave means Leave All of Great Reject Likely to mislead voters as to the (UKIP) Britain effect of their vote 10.12.18 UK Independence Party Description UKIP Stand Up 4 Brexit All of Great Reject Likely to mislead voters as to the (UKIP) Britain effect of their vote 10.12.18 UK Independence Party Description UKIP Make Brexit Happen All of Great Approve (UKIP) Britain 04.12.18 Free Democracy Party Name Free Democracy Party All of Great Reject Confusingly similar to another (FDP) (FDP) Britain already registered party 04.12.18 The London Party Name The London Party England Approve 2 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 04.12.18 The London Party Emblem England Approve 16.11.18 Bath & NorthEast Name BIG England Reject Contains an abbreviation which is Somerset Independent likely to mislead voters as to the Group effect of their vote 16.11.18 Bath & NorthEast Description Bath & NorthEast Somerset England Reject Contains more than 6 words Somerset Independent Independent Group (BIG) Group 16.11.18 Leigh, Atherton & Name Leigh, Atherton & Tyldesley England Approve Tyldesley Together Together 16.11.18 Leigh, Atherton & Emblem England Approve Tyldesley Together 16.11.18 Saddleworth, Yorkshire Name Saddleworth, Yorkshire & England Approve & Proud! Proud! 16.11.18 Saddleworth, Yorkshire Emblem England Approve & Proud! 15.11.18 Euro-American Name Euro-American Democratic All of Great Reject Application incomplete Democratic Order Re- Order Re-formation Coalition Britain formation Coalition 3 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 15.11.18 The For Britain Name The For Britain Movement Northern Reject Application incomplete Movement Ireland 14.11.18 Black Country Party Emblem England Approve 07.11.18 For Broad Oak Emblem England Approve 07.11.18 Independents for Frome Name Independents for Frome England Approve Minor Party 07.11.18 Independents for Frome Emblem England Reject Likely to mislead voters as the words spelt out in the emblem are unable to be read 07.11.18 Ingleby Barwick Emblem England Approve Independent Society 06.11.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party Scotland Reject Application incomplete 01.11.18 Britain First Name Britain First Northern Reject Application incomplete Ireland 4 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 30.10.18 Black Country Party Name Black Country Party England Approve 30.10.18 Brexit Alliance Name Brexit Alliance All of Great Rejected Likely to mislead voters as to the Britain effect of their vote and application incomplete 30.10.18 Brexit Alliance Name Brexit Alliance Northern Rejected Likely to mislead voters as to the Ireland effect of their vote and application incomplete 30.10.18 Independent Network Description Island Independent Network All of Great Approved Britain 30.10.18 Independent Network Emblem All of Great Approved Britain 30.10.18 Integrity Name Integrity England Approve 30.10.18 Integrity Description Integrity Southampton Itchen England Approve 30.10.18 Integrity Description Integrity Southampton Test England Approve 30.10.18 Integrity Description Integrity Southampton England Approve 30.10.18 Our Nation Name Our Nation All of Great Approve Britain 5 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 30.10.18 Our Nation Description Our Nation All of Great Reject Duplicate of party name Britain 30.10.18 Our Nation Description Our Nation Candidate All of Great Approve Britain 30.10.18 Our Nation Description Our Nation (Wales) All of Great Approve Britain 30.10.18 Our Nation Description Our Nation (Scotland) All of Great Approve Britain 30.10.18 Our Nation Description Our Nation (Northern All of Great Approve Ireland) Britain 30.10.18 Our Nation Description Our Nation Independent All of Great Approve Britain 30.10.18 Our Nation Emblem All of Great Approve Britain 30.10.18 Our Nation Emblem All of Great Reject Contains an unqualified prohibited Britain word 30.10.18 The London Party Name The London Party England Reject Application incomplete 23.10.18 Nova Forte Name Nova Forte All of Great Approve Britain 6 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 23.10.18 Nova Forte description The Nova Forte Candidate All of Great Approve Britain 23.10.18 Nova Forte description Nova Forte Candidate All of Great Approve Britain 23.10.18 Nova Forte description Scottish Nova Forte All of Great Approve Candidate Britain 23.10.18 Nova Forte description Scottish Nova Forte All of Great Approve Britain 23.10.18 Nova Forte description Welsh Nova Forte Candidate All of Great Approve Britain 23.10.18 Nova Forte description Welsh Nova Forte All of Great Approve Britain 23.10.18 Nova Forte description English Nova Forte All of Great Approve Candidate Britain 23.10.18 Nova Forte description English Nova Forte All of Great Approve Britain 23.10.18 Nova Forte emblem All of Great Approve Britain 22.10.18 Red Party of Scotland Name Red Party of Scotland Scotland Approve 22.10.18 Red Party of Scotland Description Democratic Socialism for the Scotland Reject Does not meet the requirements of 21st Century a description 7 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 22.10.18 Red Party of Scotland Description Public Services for the 21st Scotland Reject Does not meet the requirements of Century a description 22.10.18 Red Party of Scotland Description For an Independent, Scotland Reject Does not meet the requirements of Socialist, Republic a description 22.10.18 Red Party of Scotland Description Automation for All Scotland Reject Does not meet the requirements of a description 22.10.18 Red Party of Scotland Description Internet for All Scotland Reject Does not meet the requirements of a description 22.10.18 Red Party of Scotland Emblem Scotland Approve 20.10.18 Future Shepton Name Future Shepton England Approve 20.10.18 Future Shepton Description Working together for England Reject Does not meet the requirements of Shepton a description 20.10.18 Future Shepton Description A First Approach England Reject Does not meet the requirements of a description 20.10.18 Future Shepton Description A better way of working England
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To Consider Motions Submitted by Members of the Council Pdf 153 Kb
    LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL MEETING WEDNESDAY 18th NOVEMBER 2015 MOTIONS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF LAW, PROBITY AND GOVERNANCE SUMMARY 1. Eleven motions have been submitted by Members of the Council under Council Procedure Rule 13 for debate at the Council meeting on Wednesday 18th November 2015. 2. The motions submitted are listed overleaf. In accordance with the protocol agreed by the Council on 21st May 2008, the motions are listed by turns, one from each group, continuing in rotation until all motions submitted are included. The rotation starts with any group(s) whose motion(s) were not reached at the previous meeting. 3. Motions must be about matters for which the Council has a responsibility or which affect the Borough. A motion may not be moved which is substantially the same as a motion which has been put at a meeting of the Council in the previous six months; or which proposes that a decision of the Council taken in the previous six months be rescinded; unless notice of the motion is given signed by at least twenty Members. 4. There is no specific duration set for this agenda item and consideration of the attached motions may continue until the time limit for the meeting is reached. The guillotine procedure at Council Procedure Rule 9.2 does not apply to motions on notice and any of the attached motions which have not been put to the vote when the time limit for the meeting is reached will be deemed to have fallen.
    [Show full text]
  • Article the Empire Strikes Back: Brexit, the Irish Peace Process, and The
    ARTICLE THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK: BREXIT, THE IRISH PEACE PROCESS, AND THE LIMITATIONS OF LAW Kieran McEvoy, Anna Bryson, & Amanda Kramer* I. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................610 II. BREXIT, EMPIRE NOSTALGIA, AND THE PEACE PROCESS .......................................................................615 III. ANGLO-IRISH RELATIONS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION ...........................................................................624 IV. THE EU AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE PROCESS .......................................................................633 V. BREXIT, POLITICAL RELATIONSHIPS AND IDENTITY POLITICS IN NORTHERN IRELAND ....637 VI. BREXIT AND THE “MAINSTREAMING” OF IRISH REUNIFICATION .........................................................643 VII. BREXIT, POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND THE GOVERNANCE OF SECURITY ..................................646 VIII. CONCLUSION: BREXIT AND THE LIMITATIONS OF LAW ...............................................................................657 * The Authors are respectively Professor of Law and Transitional Justice, Senior Lecturer and Lecturer in Law, Queens University Belfast. We would like to acknowledge the comments and advice of a number of colleagues including Colin Harvey, Brian Gormally, Daniel Holder, Rory O’Connell, Gordon Anthony, John Morison, and Chris McCrudden. We would like to thank Alina Utrata, Kevin Hearty, Ashleigh McFeeters, and Órlaith McEvoy for their research assistance. As is detailed below, we would also like to thank the Economic
    [Show full text]
  • Liberals in Coalition
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 72 / Autumn 2011 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals in coalition Vernon Bogdanor Riding the tiger The Liberal experience of coalition government Ian Cawood A ‘distinction without a difference’? Liberal Unionists and Conservatives Kenneth O. Morgan Liberals in coalition, 1916–1922 David Dutton Liberalism and the National Government, 1931–1940 Matt Cole ‘Be careful what you wish for’ Lessons of the Lib–Lab Pact Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 72 Autumn 2011 new book from tHe History Group for details, see back page Journal of Liberal History issue 72: Autumn 2011 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Riding the tiger: the Liberal experience of 4 Editor: Duncan Brack coalition government Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Vernon Bogdanor introduces this special issue of the Journal Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Coalition before 1886 10 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, York Membery Whigs, Peelites and Liberals: Angus Hawkins examines coalitions before 1886 Patrons A ‘distinction without a difference’? 14 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Ian Cawood analyses how the Liberal Unionists maintained a distinctive Professor John Vincent identity from their Conservative allies, until coalition in 1895 Editorial Board The coalition of 1915–1916 26 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Prelude to disaster: Ian Packer examines the Asquith coalition of 1915–16, Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard which brought to an end the last solely Liberal government Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92
    Factsheet M12 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised November 2003 1987-92 Contents There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Summary 2 Parliament. Of these by-elections, eight resulted Notes 3 Tables 3 in a change in winning party compared with the Constituency results 9 1987 General Election. The Conservatives lost Contact information 20 seven seats of which four went to the Liberal Feedback form 21 Democrats and three to Labour. Twenty of the by- elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while three were due to resignations. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets November 2003 FS No.M12 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-election results: 1987-92 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M12 Summary There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 9 summarise the results and pages 10 to 17 give results for each constituency. Eight seats changed hands in the 1987 Parliament at by-elections. The Conservatives lost four seats to Labour and three to the Liberal Democrats. Labour lost Glasgow, Govan to the SNP. The merger of the Liberal Party and Social Democratic Party took place in March 1988 with the party named the Social and Liberal Democrats. This was changed to Liberal Democrats in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • London Environment Strategy REPORT to the MAYOR on CONSULTATION on the DRAFT LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY
    London Environment Strategy REPORT TO THE MAYOR ON CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority May 2018 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Photographs © Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report CONTENTS 1 Executive summary 3 2 Introduction and background 7 What the strategy must contain 7 Draft strategy aims 7 Purpose of this report 8 Draft London Plan 9 3 Consultation process 10 The draft strategy consultation 10 Digital engagement with the draft strategy 12 Additional public engagement with the draft strategy 17 Technical stakeholder engagement with the draft strategy 18 How the consultation responses were analysed 19 4 Main issues raised, and proposed strategy changes 23 General 24 Air quality 36 Green infrastructure 55 Climate change mitigation and energy (CCME) 65 Waste 83 Adapting to climate change 100 Ambient noise 109 Low carbon circular economy (LCCE) 122 GLA group operations – leading by example 128 What can Londoners do to help? 128 Key performance indicators 129 Integrated Impact Assessment 130 5 Conclusions and recommendations 134 6 Next steps 135 7 Abbreviations 136 8 Glossary 137 9 Appendices 138 London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report 2 Appendix 1: Examples of the four campaign letters received as part of
    [Show full text]
  • Somalis in London
    Somalis-cover-final-LONDON_20140929_Layout 1 2014.09.29. 20:04 Page 1 AT HOME IN EUROPE SOMALIS SOMALIS IN Minority communities – whether Muslim, migrant or Roma – continue to come under LONDON intense scrutiny in Europe today. This complex situation presents Europe with one its greatest challenges: how to ensure equal rights in an environment of rapidly expanding diversity. IN LONDON At Home in Europe, part of the Open Society Initiative for Europe, Open Society Foundations, is a research and advocacy initiative which works to advance equality and social justice for minority and marginalised groups excluded from the mainstream of civil, political, economic, and, cultural life in Western Europe. Somalis in European Cities Muslims in EU Cities was the project’s first comparative research series which examined the position of Muslims in 11 cities in the European Union. Somalis in European cities follows from the findings emerging from the Muslims in EU Cities reports and offers the experiences and challenges faced by Somalis across seven cities in Europe. The research aims to capture the everyday, lived experiences as well as the type and degree of engagement policymakers have initiated with their Somali and minority constituents. 01 somalis-LONDON-inc-publish-2014-0930_publish.qxd 2014.09.30. 14:59 Page 1 Somalis in London At Home in Europe 01 somalis-LONDON-inc-publish-2014-0930_publish.qxd 2014.09.30. 14:59 Page 2 ©2014 Open Society Foundations This publication is available as a pdf on the Open Society Foundations website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Open Society Foundations and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets
    Non-Executive Report of the: COUNCIL 21 March 2018 Report of: Asmat Hussain, Corporate Director, Classification: Governance and Monitoring Officer Unrestricted Motion for debate submitted by the Administration Originating Officer(s) Matthew Mannion, Committee Services Manager, Democratic Services. Wards affected All wards SUMMARY 1. Council Procedure Rule 11 allows for time at each Ordinary Council meeting for the discussion of one specific Motion submitted by the Administration. The debate will follow the rules of debate at Council Procedure Rule 13 and will last no more than 30 minutes. 2. The motion submitted is listed overleaf. The Administration Motion is submitted by the Labour Group. 3. Motions must be about matters for which the Council or its partners has a direct responsibility. A motion may not be moved which is substantially the same as a motion which has been put at a meeting of the Council in the previous six months; or which proposes that a decision of the Council taken in the previous six months be rescinded; unless notice of the motion is given signed by at least twenty Members. 4. Notice of any proposed amendments to the Motions must be given to the Monitoring Officer by Noon the day before the meeting. MOTION Set out overleaf is the motion that has been submitted. 7 – Administration Motion regarding the future of Tower Hamlets Council Proposer: Mayor John Biggs Seconder: Councillor Sirajul Islam This Council notes that: 1. Tower Hamlets Council has emerged from a period of turbulence and chaos which was created by the previous mayor Lutfur Rahman and his administration, many of whom still serve as councillors.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 669 19 December 2019 No. 3 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 19 December 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. Chronology of The Parliamentary Debates The Parliamentary History contains all that can be collected of the Legislative History of this country from the Conquest to the close of the XVIIIth Century (1803), 36 vols. The chief sources whence these Debates are derived are the Constitutional History, 24 vols.; Sir Simonds D’Ewes’ Journal; Debates of the Commons in 1620 and 1621; Chandler and Timberland’s Debates, 22 vols.; Grey’s Debates of the Commons, from 1667 to 1694, 10 vols.; Almons Debates, 24 vols.; Debrett’s Debates, 63 vols.; The Hardwicke Papers; Debates in Parliament by Dr. Johnson, &c. &c. THE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES commenced with the year 1803, and the contents are set forth in the following Chronological Table:— HISTORY (EIGHTH PARLIAMENT) CONQUEST TO 34 GEO. II.—1066 to 1760 Vol. 16 ..........................7 GEO. IV. ...........1826 Vol.1to15.1Will.Ito34Geo.II — 17 ..........................8 — ...........1827 1066-1760 — 18 & 19..................9 — ...........1828 REIGN OF GEO. III.—1760 to 1820 — 20—21 .................10 — ...........1829 Vol. 15 to 35. Geo. III to 40 Geo. III. — 22 to 25 ...............11 — ...........1830 1760—1800 Third Series PARLIAMENTS OF UNITED KINGDOM OF REIGN OF WILLIAM IV. —1830 to 1837 GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND (NINTH PARLIAMENT) (FIRST PARLIAMENT) Vol. 1 to 3.....................1 WILL. IV. .......1830-1 Vol. 35.........................41 GEO.
    [Show full text]
  • Race and Elections
    Runnymede Perspectives Race and Elections Edited by Omar Khan and Kjartan Sveinsson Runnymede: Disclaimer This publication is part of the Runnymede Perspectives Intelligence for a series, the aim of which is to foment free and exploratory thinking on race, ethnicity and equality. The facts presented Multi-ethnic Britain and views expressed in this publication are, however, those of the individual authors and not necessariliy those of the Runnymede Trust. Runnymede is the UK’s leading independent thinktank on race equality ISBN: 978-1-909546-08-0 and race relations. Through high-quality research and thought leadership, we: Published by Runnymede in April 2015, this document is copyright © Runnymede 2015. Some rights reserved. • Identify barriers to race equality and good race Open access. Some rights reserved. relations; The Runnymede Trust wants to encourage the circulation of • Provide evidence to its work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. support action for social The trust has an open access policy which enables anyone change; to access its content online without charge. Anyone can • Influence policy at all download, save, perform or distribute this work in any levels. format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Licence Deed: Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales. Its main conditions are: • You are free to copy, distribute, display and perform the work; • You must give the original author credit; • You may not use this work for commercial purposes; • You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. You are welcome to ask Runnymede for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixed-Term Parliaments Act
    House of Commons House of Lords Joint Committee on the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act Report Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 March 2021 Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed 18 March 2021 HC 1046 HL 253 Published on 24 March 2021 by authority of the House of Commons and House of Lords Joint Committee on the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act The Joint Committee was appointed to: (a) carry out a review of the operation of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, pursuant to section 7 of that Act, and if appropriate in consequence of its findings, make recommendations for the repeal or amendment of that Act; and (b) consider, as part of its work under subparagraph (a), and report on any draft Government Bill on the repeal of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 presented to both Houses in this session. Membership House of Lords House of Commons Lord McLoughlin (Chair) (Conservative) Aaron Bell MP (Conservative, Newcastle- under-Lyme) Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat) Chris Bryant MP (Labour, Rhondda) Lord Grocott (Labour) Jackie Doyle-Price MP (Conservative, Lord Jay of Ewelme (Crossbench) Thurrock) Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon (Labour) Dame Angela Eagle MP (Labour, Wallasey) Lord Mancroft (Conservative) Maria Eagle MP (Labour, Garston and Halewood) Peter Gibson MP (Conservative, Darlington) Mr Robert Goodwill MP (Conservative, Scarborough and Whitby) David Linden MP (Scottish National Party, Glasgow East) Alan Mak MP (Conservative, Havant) Mrs Maria Miller MP
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland and the EU Referendum
    House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Northern Ireland and the EU referendum First Report of Session 2016–17 HC 48 House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Northern Ireland and the EU referendum First Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 25 May 2016 HC 48 Published on 26 May 2016 by authority of the House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Northern Ireland Office (but excluding individual cases and advice given by the Crown Solicitor); and other matters within the responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (but excluding the expenditure, administration and policy of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Northern Ireland and the drafting of legislation by the Office of the Legislative Counsel). Current membership Mr Laurence Robertson MP (Conservative, Tewkesbury) (Chair) Tom Blenkinsop MP (Labour, Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland) Oliver Colvile MP (Conservative, Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport) Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Mr Stephen Hepburn MP (Labour, Jarrow) Lady Hermon MP (Independent, North Down) Kate Hoey MP (Labour, Vauxhall) Danny Kinahan MP (Ulster Unionist Party, South Antrim) Jack Lopresti MP (Conservative, Filton and Bradley Stoke) Dr Alasdair McDonnell MP (Social Democratic and Labour Party, Belfast South) Nigel Mills MP (Conservative, Amber Valley) Ian Paisley MP (Democratic Unionist Party, North Antrim) Gavin Robinson MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast East) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.
    [Show full text]
  • Penderfyniadau Cofrestru Pleidiau 2018
    Penderfyniadau cofrestru pleidiau 2018 Penderfyniadau gan y Comisiwn i gymeradwyo neu wrthod enwau, disgrifiadau ac arwyddluniau y gwneid cais amdanynt yn nhrefn dyddiad Gallwch ddod o hyd i fanylion cofrestru presennol ymgeiswyr drwy glicio ar eu henw Mae trosolwg o'r rheolau o ran cofrestru enwau pleidiau gwleidyddol, disgrifiadau ac arwyddluniau ar gael yma. Dyddiad Enw ymgeisydd Math o Marc adnabod y gwaned Cais yn Penderfyni Mwy o wybodaeth/ penderfy farc cais amdano berthnasol i ad rheswm dros wrthod niad adnabod ba ran o’r Cofrestru gwnaed DU? cais amdano 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Enw Both Unions Party Prydain Fawr i Cymeradwy gyd wyd 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Disgrifiad Scotland for Both Unions: UK Prydain Fawr i Cymeradwy Europe gyd wyd 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Disgrifiad Together we are all strongest Prydain Fawr i Gwrthodwy Ddim yn bodloni anghenion disgrifiad gyd ded 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Arwyddlun Prydain Fawr i Gwrthodwy Yn ddryslyd o debyg i farc adnabod gyd ded cofrestredig presennol 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Enw Both Unions Party of Cais Gogledd Cymeradwy Northern Ireland Iwerddon wyd 10.12.18 Ein Gwlad Enw Ein Gwlad Cymru Gwrthodwy Cais anghyflawn ded 10.12.18 Future Shepton Disgrifiad Future Shepton – Working Lloegr Cymeradwy together for Shepton wyd 10.12.18 Future Shepton Disgrifiad A fresh approach with Future Lloegr Cymeradwy Shepton wyd 10.12.18 Future Shepton Disgrifiad Future Shepton – a new Lloegr Cymeradwy approach wyd 10.12.18 Future Shepton Disgrifiad Putting Shepton first with Lloegr Cymeradwy
    [Show full text]