Somalis in London

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Somalis in London Somalis-cover-final-LONDON_20140929_Layout 1 2014.09.29. 20:04 Page 1 AT HOME IN EUROPE SOMALIS SOMALIS IN Minority communities – whether Muslim, migrant or Roma – continue to come under LONDON intense scrutiny in Europe today. This complex situation presents Europe with one its greatest challenges: how to ensure equal rights in an environment of rapidly expanding diversity. IN LONDON At Home in Europe, part of the Open Society Initiative for Europe, Open Society Foundations, is a research and advocacy initiative which works to advance equality and social justice for minority and marginalised groups excluded from the mainstream of civil, political, economic, and, cultural life in Western Europe. Somalis in European Cities Muslims in EU Cities was the project’s first comparative research series which examined the position of Muslims in 11 cities in the European Union. Somalis in European cities follows from the findings emerging from the Muslims in EU Cities reports and offers the experiences and challenges faced by Somalis across seven cities in Europe. The research aims to capture the everyday, lived experiences as well as the type and degree of engagement policymakers have initiated with their Somali and minority constituents. 01 somalis-LONDON-inc-publish-2014-0930_publish.qxd 2014.09.30. 14:59 Page 1 Somalis in London At Home in Europe 01 somalis-LONDON-inc-publish-2014-0930_publish.qxd 2014.09.30. 14:59 Page 2 ©2014 Open Society Foundations This publication is available as a pdf on the Open Society Foundations website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Open Society Foundations and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes. Photographs may not be used separately from the publication. ISBN: 978-1-940983-07-3 Published by OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS 224 West 57th Street New York NY10019 United States For more information contact: AT HOME IN EUROPE OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE FOR EUROPE Millbank Tower, 21-24 Millbank, London, SW1P 4QP, UK Website www.opensocietyfoundations.org/projects/home-europe Layout by Q.E.D. Publishing Printed in Hungary Printed on CyclusOffset paper produced from 100% recycled fibres. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................... 5 Preface .......................................................................................... 7 Somalis in London ......................................................................... 9 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................... 15 Executive Summary ......................................................... 17 1. Introduction .................................................................... 21 2. Population and Demographics .......................................... 24 3. Policy Context ................................................................. 31 4. Identity and Belonging .................................................... 37 5. Education ........................................................................ 50 6. Employment .................................................................... 66 7. Housing .......................................................................... 81 8. Health and Social Protection ........................................... 97 9. Policing and Security ..................................................... 106 10. Participation and Citizenship ......................................... 119 11. The Role of the Media ................................................... 127 12. Conclusions ................................................................... 133 13. Recommendations ......................................................... 135 Annex 1. Bibliography ........................................................... 140 Annex 2. List of Stakeholders Interviewed .............................. 145 AT HOME IN EUROPE 3 Open Society Foundations Mission Statement The Open Society Foundations work to build vibrant and tolerant societies whose governments are accountable to their citizens. Working with local communities in more than 100 countries, the Open Society Foundations support justice and human rights, freedom of expression, and access to public health and education. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This city report was prepared as part of a series of reports titled Somalis in European Cities. The series focuses on seven cities in Europe with a Somali origin population. The cities chosen, and within them specific neighbourhoods, are Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Helsinki, Leicester, London, Malmo, and Oslo. The reports have been prepared by At Home in Europe, part of the Open Society Initiative for Europe, Open Society Foundations, and in cooperation with local/national based experts. The field work for the Somalis in London report was headed by Asha Abdillahi, Project Officer at Account3 and she was supported by Hanan Jama, Amran Dubad and Sulaiman Egeh. The draft of the report was led by Anya Ahmed, Senior Lecturer in Social Policy, School of Midwifery, Nursing, Social Work and Social Sciences, University of Salford. We warmly thank Anya and Asha for their expertise, patience and commitment. We are particularly grateful to the Somali communities in Camden and Tower Hamlets, without whom, this research would not have been possible. The following individuals were instrumental in providing access to focus groups and stakeholder interviews in Camden and Tower Hamlets: Ibrahim Isse, Mohammed Abdillahi, Toni Meredew, Faisal Ali, and Abdi Hassan. An advisory board was created with the mandate to offer expert advice and input into all stages of the research and analysis. We would like to thank: Advisory Board Awale Olad, Councillor, London Borough of Camden Ali Ahmed, Third Sector Strategy Officer, Directorate of Development and Renewal (Tower Hamlets) Safia Jama, Coordinator, Somali Integration Team (SIT) Ubah Egal, Director and Social Work Lead, Camden Somali Cultural Centre In March 2014, the Open Society Foundations held a closed roundtable meeting in London inviting critique and commentary on the draft report. We are grateful to the many participants who generously offered their time and expertise. These included representatives of Somali and other minority groups, civil society organisations, city officials, and relevant experts. At Home in Europe has final responsibility for the content of the report, including any errors or misrepresentations. AT HOME IN EUROPE 5 SOMALIS IN LONDON Open Society Initiative For Europe Team (At Home in Europe) Nazia Hussain Director Hélène Irving Program Coordinator Klaus Dik Nielsen Advocacy Officer Andrea Gurubi Watterson Program Officer Csilla Tóth Program Assistant Tufyal Choudhury Sen. Policy Consultant 6 OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS 2014 PREFACE PREFACE A central belief of the Open Society Foundations is that all people in an open society count equally and should enjoy equal opportunities. The Open Society Foundations work day-to-day with civil society organizations across Europe to respond to discrimination, prejudice and injustice; to understand the emergence of new and sometimes worrying political phenomena; to inform better practices in policing and security; to connect those seeking justice and equality with policymakers and institutions; to promote inclusion for Europe’s minorities; to support a critical and informed discourse among nongovernmental actors; and to empower grassroots organizations to seek change for themselves, unique to their own local context. At Home in Europe, part of the Open Society Initiative for Europe, Open Society Foundations, is a research and advocacy initiative which works to advance equality and social justice for groups excluded from the mainstream of civil, political, economic, and cultural life in Western Europe. It places a high priority on local community and city level practices that mitigate discrimination and seek to ensure access to equal opportunities for all. At Home in Europe engages with policymakers, civil society organisations, and communities at the local, national and international level to improve the social inclusion of Europe’s diverse minority and marginalised communities in different ways. Minority communities – whether Muslim, migrant or Roma – continue to come under intense scrutiny in Europe today. This complex situation presents Europe with one of its greatest challenges: how to ensure equal rights in an environment of rapidly expanding diversity. The Somali community is one such emerging minority group on whom a lack of precise data hampers the possibility of achieving meaningful integration. People of Somali origin have lived in parts of Europe for many generations but in the past 15 years their numbers have increased. There are no accurate figures for the number of Somalis in Europe but on the whole, whilst small in absolute numbers, they are among one of the continent’s largest refugee groups and a growing minority population. Europe’s Somalis can be divided into three broad categories: people of Somali origin born in Europe, Somali refugees and asylum seekers (who came directly from Somalia or neighbouring countries largely as a result of conflict) and Somalis who migrated to a country in Europe from elsewhere in Europe, such as from Sweden to the UK for example. They are a diverse and vibrant community who suffer from negative and biased media representation and stereotyping. There is a limited understanding
Recommended publications
  • Ward Profile 2020 West Hampstead Ward
    Ward Profile 2020 Strategy & Change, January 2020 West Hampstead Ward The most detailed profile of West Hampstead ward is from the 2011 Census (2011 Census Profiles)1. This profile updates information that is available between censuses: from estimates and projections, from surveys and from administrative data. Location West Hampstead ward is located to the north-west of Camden. It is bordered to the north by Fortune Green ward; to the east by Frognal and Fitzjohns ward; to the south by Kilburn ward and Swiss Cottage ward; and to the west by the London Borough of Brent. Population The current resident population2 of West Hampstead ward at mid-2019 is 14,100 people, ranking 7th largest ward by population size. The population density is 159 persons per hectare, ranking 7th highest in Camden, compared to the Camden average of 114 persons per hectare. Since 2011, the population of West Hampstead has grown faster than the overall population of Camden (at 17.2% compared with 13.4%), the 3rd fastest growing ward on percentage population change since 2011. 1 Further 2011 Census cross-tabulations of data are available (email [email protected]). 2 GLA 2017-based Projections ‘Camden Development, Capped AHS’, © GLA, 2019. 1 West Hampstead’s population is projected to increase by 1,900 (13.1%) over the next 10 years to 2029. The components of population change show a positive natural change (more births than deaths) over the period of +1,200 and net migration of +600. Births in the wards are forecast to be stable at the current level of 180 a year, while deaths are forecast to increase from the current level of 50, increasing to 60 by 2029.
    [Show full text]
  • To Consider Motions Submitted by Members of the Council Pdf 153 Kb
    LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL MEETING WEDNESDAY 18th NOVEMBER 2015 MOTIONS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF LAW, PROBITY AND GOVERNANCE SUMMARY 1. Eleven motions have been submitted by Members of the Council under Council Procedure Rule 13 for debate at the Council meeting on Wednesday 18th November 2015. 2. The motions submitted are listed overleaf. In accordance with the protocol agreed by the Council on 21st May 2008, the motions are listed by turns, one from each group, continuing in rotation until all motions submitted are included. The rotation starts with any group(s) whose motion(s) were not reached at the previous meeting. 3. Motions must be about matters for which the Council has a responsibility or which affect the Borough. A motion may not be moved which is substantially the same as a motion which has been put at a meeting of the Council in the previous six months; or which proposes that a decision of the Council taken in the previous six months be rescinded; unless notice of the motion is given signed by at least twenty Members. 4. There is no specific duration set for this agenda item and consideration of the attached motions may continue until the time limit for the meeting is reached. The guillotine procedure at Council Procedure Rule 9.2 does not apply to motions on notice and any of the attached motions which have not been put to the vote when the time limit for the meeting is reached will be deemed to have fallen.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Party Registration Decisions-English Version
    2018 Party registration decisions Decisions by the Commission to approve or reject applied for party names, descriptions and emblems in date order You can find the current registration details of the applicants by clicking on their name An overview of the rules on registering a political party names, descriptions and emblems can be found here Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party All of Great Approve Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Scotland for Both Unions: All of Great Approve UK Europe Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Together we are all All of Great Reject Does not meet the requirements of strongest Britain a description 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Emblem All of Great Reject Confusingly similar to another Britain already registered party 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party of Northern Approve Northern Ireland Ireland 10.12.18 Ein Gwlad Name Ein Gwlad Wales Reject Application incomplete 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Future Shepton – Working England Approve together for Shepton 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description A fresh approach with Future England Approve Shepton 1 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which
    [Show full text]
  • Month Ward Used to Injure Not Used to Injure March Bloomsbury 0 3
    Month Ward Used to Injure Not used to injure March Bloomsbury 0 3 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 1 5 Cantelowes 1 0 Fortune Green 1 0 Frognal and Fitz'ohns 0 1 Gospel Oak 0 2 Haverstock 1 1 Highgate 1 0 Holborn and Covent Garden 0 3 Kentish Town 3 1 Kilburn 1 1 King's Cross 0 2 Regent's Park 2 2 St Pancras and Somers Town 0 1 Swiss Cottage 0 1 West Hampstead 0 4 March Total 11 27 April Belsize 0 2 Bloomsbury 1 9 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 0 4 Cantelowes 1 1 Hampstead Town 0 2 Haverstock 2 3 Highgate 0 3 Holborn and Covent Garden 0 1 Kentish Town 1 1 Kilburn 1 0 King's Cross 0 4 Regent's Park 0 2 St Pancras and Somers Town 1 3 West Hampstead 0 1 April Total 7 36 May Belsize 0 1 Bloomsbury 0 9 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 0 1 Cantelowes 0 7 Frognal and Fitzjohns 0 2 Gospel Oak 1 3 Holborn and Covent Garden 0 1 Kilburn 0 1 King's Cross 1 1 St Pancras and Somers Town 1 4 Swiss Cottage 0 1 West Hampstead 1 0 May Total 4 31 June Belsize 1 2 Bloomsbury 0 1 0 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 4 6 Cantelowes 0 1 Fortune Green 2 0 Gospel Oak 1 3 Haverstock 0 1 Highgate 0 2 Holborn and Covent Garden 1 4 Kentish Town 3 1 MPS FOIA Disclosure Kilburn 2 1 King's Cross 1 1 Regent's Park 2 1 St Pancras and Somers Town 1 3 Swiss Cottage 0 2 West Hampstead 0 1 June Total 18 39 July Bloomsbury 0 6 Camden Town with P rimrose Hill 5 1 Cantelowes 1 3 Frognal and Fitz'ohns 0 2 Gospel Oak 2 0 Haverstock 0 1 Highgate 0 4 Holborn and Covent Garden 0 3 Kentish Town 1 0 King's Cross 0 3 Regent's Park 1 2 St Pancras and Somers Town 1 0 Swiss Cottage 1 2 West
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile 2020 Haverstock Ward
    Ward Profile 2020 Strategy & Change, January 2020 Haverstock Ward The most detailed profile of Haverstock ward is still from the 2011 Census (2011 Census Profiles)1. This profile updates information that is available between censuses: from estimates and projections, from surveys or from administrative data. Location Haverstock ward is located geographically towards the centre of Camden. It is bordered to the south by Camden Town with Primrose Hill ward; to the east by Kentish Town ward; to the north by Gospel Oak ward and to the West by Belsize ward. Population The projected resident population2 of Haverstock ward at mid-2019 is 13,800 people, ranking 9th by population size in Camden. The population density is 188 persons per hectare, the 4th highest in Camden, compared to the Camden average of 114 persons per hectare. Since 2011, the population of Haverstock has grown at a lower rate to the overall population of th Camden (at 11.5% compared with 13.4%), ranking 12 on percentage growth since 2011. 1 Further 2011 Census cross-tabulations of data are available (email [email protected]). 2 GLA 2017-based Interim Projections ‘Camden Development, Capped AHS’, © GLA, 2019. 1 Haverstock is forecast to grow by 300 residents (2.3%) over the next 10 years to 2029. The components of population change show a positive natural change (more births than deaths) over the period of +700 and a net loss due to migration of -300. Births in the ward are forecast to fall from the current 160 a year to 130 by 2029, while deaths remain stable at around 80 a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Value Inspection of London Borough of Tower Hamlets Report 16 October 2014 Best Value Inspection of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets
    www.pwc.co.uk Best Value Inspection of London Borough of Tower Hamlets Report 16 October 2014 Best Value Inspection of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Contents Section Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Summary and conclusions 12 3. TheAuthorityandtheBoroughofTowerHamlets 42 4. The Authority’s payment of grants and connected decisions 51 5. The transfer of property to third parties 99 6. SpendingandthedecisionsoftheAuthorityinrelationtopublicity 146 7. Processes and practices for entering into contracts 160 16 October 2014 PwC Contents Best Value Inspection of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets List of terms and abbreviations The table below includes a description of the defined terms and abbreviations used within this report. Term Description the 1972 Act Local Government Act 1972. the 1999 Act Local Government Act 1999 (as amended by the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014). theAgressoFinancialData AcopyofthedataheldintheAgressoFinancialSystem. the Agresso Financial System The primary financial / Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system employed by the Authority from April 2013. AHWB or AHW Adults Health and Wellbeing directorate. AMCSB Asset Management and Capital Strategy Board. AMCSWG Asset Management and Capital Strategy Working Group. the Appointment Letter Letter dated 4 April 2014 appointing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to carry out the Inspection. theAuthority ThelocalauthorityoftheLondonBoroughofTowerHamlets. BAFO Best and Final Offer. BBC Panorama BBC Panorama programme aired on 31 March 2014 titled 'Panorama: The Mayor and Our Money'. BNP Paribas BNP Paribas Real Estate Advisory & Property Management UK Limited. the Borough Tower Hamlets as a geographical and electoral area. theCabinet AcommitteecomposedoftheMayor,theDeputyMayorandeight Lead Members appointed by the Mayor. Call in Process through which Executive decisions are brought for consideration and/or challenge by the O&S Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Events in the Local Elections in Tower Hamlets Have Provoked National Interest and Display Worrying Signs of Division
    democraticaudit.com http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=5902 Events in the local elections in Tower Hamlets have provoked national interest and display worrying signs of division By Democratic Audit The Tower Hamlets political scene has long been known for its unique flavour and numerous idiosyncrasies. May 22nd’s Mayoral election was one of the most interesting chapters yet, with the incumbent Lutfur Rahman winning re-election in controversial circumstances. Here, the former Leader of Tower Hamlets Council Michael Keith, reflects on what the election means for the Borough, and argues for the cultivation of a new politics for the area that transcends racial, religious or ethnic division. Lutfur Rahman was re-elected as Mayor of Tower Hamlets in controversial circumstances (Credit: Timrich27, CC BY NC ND 2.0) Following a conversation at the vote counting, Ted Jeory asked for a personal reaction to the outcome of last week’s local elections. It followed what I think was a sense shared that regardless of party affiliation the divisive politics of Tower Hamlets had reached a particularly worrying moment. Occasionally boisterous, too frequently threatening, the scenes at the Tower Hamlets mayoral count prompted a storm. Shut inside the Troxy venue when supporters of the independent mayor Lutfur Rahman and his party Tower Hamlets First began pre-emptively celebrating his re-election, the mass surge to access the vote count prompted anger amongst council officers and campaigners alike. Some with a longer memory may cast their minds back to similar scenes outside York Hall that greeted the success of Peter Shore in 1987 and 1992 and fairly protest that mainstream parties commented on this less at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMDEN STREET NAMES and Their Origins
    CAMDEN STREET NAMES and their origins © David A. Hayes and Camden History Society, 2020 Introduction Listed alphabetically are In 1853, in London as a whole, there were o all present-day street names in, or partly 25 Albert Streets, 25 Victoria, 37 King, 27 Queen, within, the London Borough of Camden 22 Princes, 17 Duke, 34 York and 23 Gloucester (created in 1965); Streets; not to mention the countless similarly named Places, Roads, Squares, Terraces, Lanes, o abolished names of streets, terraces, Walks, Courts, Alleys, Mews, Yards, Rents, Rows, alleyways, courts, yards and mews, which Gardens and Buildings. have existed since c.1800 in the former boroughs of Hampstead, Holborn and St Encouraged by the General Post Office, a street Pancras (formed in 1900) or the civil renaming scheme was started in 1857 by the parishes they replaced; newly-formed Metropolitan Board of Works o some named footpaths. (MBW), and administered by its ‘Street Nomenclature Office’. The project was continued Under each heading, extant street names are after 1889 under its successor body, the London itemised first, in bold face. These are followed, in County Council (LCC), with a final spate of name normal type, by names superseded through changes in 1936-39. renaming, and those of wholly vanished streets. Key to symbols used: The naming of streets → renamed as …, with the new name ← renamed from …, with the old Early street names would be chosen by the name and year of renaming if known developer or builder, or the owner of the land. Since the mid-19th century, names have required Many roads were initially lined by individually local-authority approval, initially from parish named Terraces, Rows or Places, with houses Vestries, and then from the Metropolitan Board of numbered within them.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality in Camden: a Guide for Public Health
    AIR QUALITY IN CAMDEN: A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Camden COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2012 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4126 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Camden CONTENTS Description Page How to use this document 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Air Pollution 3 2.1 External air pollution 3 2.2 Internal air pollution 6 3 Air Quality in LB Camden 8 4 Air quality impacts on health 12 4.1 Premature deaths 12 4.2 Vulnerable groups 13 4.3 Air pollution and deprivation 14 4.4 The Public Health Outcomes Framework 15 5 Health impacts in LB Camden 17 6 Co-benefits of improving air quality in London 18 6.1 Maximising the health benefits from improving air quality 18 6.2 Cost of the impact of Air Pollution 19 7 Policy and legal framework for improving air quality 21 7.1 EU Directive 21 7.2 UK air quality policy 21 7.3 Regional strategies 22 7.4 Local Authority responsibilities 24 8 Taking action 25 8.1 Actions taken by the Mayor 25 8.2 Borough level action 26 8.3 Individual action 28 9 Next steps 30 10 References 31 11 Glossary 33 12 Appendices 38 Appendix 1 – Annual mean concentration of pollutants 38 Appendix 2 – National air quality objectives 39 Appendix 3 – Actions for Londoners to mitigate and adapt to air pollution 41 Air Quality Information for Public Health Professionals – London Borough of Camden HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT Air quality is an important Public Health issue in London, it contributes to shortening the life expectancy of all Londoners, disproportionately impacting on the most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Name/Description Address Ward CIL Funding Total Date
    CIL Funding Reference Name/Description Address Ward Date Agreed Total Belsize Terrace, adjacent to/junction with no. 41a LCIL011 Belsize RA Notice Board Belsize £725.15 10/05/2017 Belsize Lane NW3 5AU 1. Belsize Village, Belsize Lane and 2. Belsize LCIL057 Belsize Community Safety (CCTV) Belsize £92,000.00 11/04/2018 Park Gardens/ Englands Lane Belsize and Swiss Cottage Market Area: Swiss Belsize and Swiss Cottage Air LCIL056BE Cottage Farmers Market, Adamson Road, Eton Belsize £2,510.00 25/05/2018 Quality Monitoring Avenue, Winchester Road Wac Arts, The Old Town Hall, 213 Haverstock LCIL120 Inside Out Wac Arts Belsize £25,000.00 08/08/2019 Hill, London NW3 4QP LCIL137 NW3 School Run Belsize £1,035.00 17/10/2019 Belsize Community Library Chairs Belsize Community Library, Antrim Road London LCIL058 Belsize £7,528.80 14/11/2019 and Extractor Fan NW3 4XN Restoration at Belsize Community Belsize Community Library, 8 Antrim Grove, LCIL106 Belsize £12,840.00 12/12/2019 Library Belsize Park, London NW3 4XN CIL Funding Reference Name/Description Address Ward Date Agreed Total LCIL226BL Belsize Streatery Belsize Village, NW3 Belsize £18,636.62 03/07/2020 Belsize Community Library COVID- Belsize Community Library, Antrim Grove, LCIL248 Belsize £23,674.00 05/11/2020 19 Support Belsize Park, London NW3 4XP Gays the Word LCIL105 Gays the Word Video 86 Marchmont Street Bloomsbury £54.51 31/05/2019 Bloomsbury 33 Conway Street 14 Goodge Place 27 Tottenham Street 19-21 Ridgemount Street 3 Huntley Street (new lamp column) LCIL110BL EV Charge Points Bloomsbury Bloomsbury £20,584.00 25/07/2019 Endsleigh street, east side, junction with Tavistock square.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Leadership in a Global Era
    Amy M. Hochadel LOCAL LEADERSHIP IN A GLOBAL ERA Policy and Behaviour Change in Cities Local Leadership in a Global Era Amy M. Hochadel Local Leadership in a Global Era Policy and Behaviour Change in Cities Amy M. Hochadel London, UK ISBN 978-3-319-58980-0 ISBN 978-3-319-58981-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58981-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017945368 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub- lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institu- tional affiliations.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications Received
    Applications Received Camden’s weekly list of all new applications Week: 22/07/2019 List No.: 539 Camden’s weekly list of all new applications for Planning Permission, Listed Building Consent, Conservation Area Consent, Advertisement Consent and Tree Permissions. Also Planning Appeals & Hearings www.camden.gov.uk/planning Weekly list of New Applications To find out more about any application you can: • Contact our duty planning officer on 020 7974 1911. • See the application and plans: o on our website, www.camden.gov.uk/planning o at the Environment Department Reception, 5 th Floor, Camden Town Hall, Argyle Street, London, WC1H 8EQ between 9am and 5pm Monday to Friday or until 7pm on Thursdays. A planning officer is available during these times to help you look at the plans and offer planning advice. To make comments about any application you can: • Fill in the online comments form on our website. • Email us at [email protected] . • Write to Development Control, Customer Services Team at the above address. Comments must be received by the end of the consultation period, which lasts 21 days from the date of notification letters and the site notice. Please quote the above reference when you contact us. There is no legal requirement to consult on the following types of application: • Certificates of Lawfulness of Proposed Use • Certificates of Lawfulness of Existing Use • Internal alterations only to a Listed Building (Grade II only) • Control of Advertisements • Approval of detail. • Non Material Amendments The Council will not take into account comments on the above unless the case officer considers that consultation may help reveal local knowledge that will help their decision.
    [Show full text]