<<

Big Lake

Milford Commerce

Commerce Lake

Pinckney

South Lyon Hamburg

Baseline (Flook) Dam Dexter

Chelsea Barton Impoundment Ann Arbor

Ypsilanti French Landing Dam

Belleville

Flat Rock N

W E

S

Figure 1.—The Huron River watershed in Southeastern . The major reaches of the Huron River mainstem. Reach #1 - Big Lake to Commerce Lake; Reach #2 - Commerce Lake to Baseline (Flook) Dam; Reach #3 - Baseline (Flook) Dam to Barton Impoundment; Reach #4 - Barton Impoundment to French Landing Dam; Reach #5 - French Landing Dam to Lake Erie. 116 140 Headwaters 120 Milford 100 0 Kent Lake Commerce Impoundment River mile 08 Barton Argo 06 Geddes Superior Peninsula Ford 04 Belleville Flat Rock 02 Mouth

1.05 1.00 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 Figure 2.—Elevation changes, by river mile, from the headwaters to the mouth of the Huron River. Major mainstem dams and the Elevation above sea level in feet (thousands) feet in level sea above Elevation impoundments they create are shown. are create they impoundments

117 Spawning habitat

migrations

migrations

Refuge habitat daily migrations Feeding and growth winter habitat drought

Figure 3.—The basic life cycle of stream fish with respect to habitat use (modified from Schlosser 1991). 118 Milford Commerce

Pinckney

South Lyon Hamburg

Dexter

Chelsea

Ann Arbor Ypsilanti

Belleville

N Flat Rock

W E

Lake Erie S

Figure 4.—Approximate locations of dams in the Huron River watershed. 119 Dec Nov Oct No Storage With Storage Sep Aug Jul Months Jun May Apr Mar Feb Jan 0

80 60 40 20

200 180 160 140 120 100 Discharge (cubic feet per second) per feet (cubic Discharge Figure 5.—Median monthly Huron River discharge from Kent Lake, with and without the effect of Kent Lake reservoir. Lake of Kent with and without the effect Lake, from Kent discharge Figure 5.—Median monthly Huron River

120 0 e Commerc Ann Arbor Hayes Creek S. Ore Creek Portage Creek Mill Creek Percent exceedence Au Sable 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.

median flow median Standardized discharge (Q / 50%Q) / (Q discharge Standardized Figure 6.—Standardized high flow exceedence curves for the mainstem Huron River at Commerce and Ann Arbor and for four major tributaries. tributaries. major four for and Arbor Ann and Commerce at River Huron mainstem the for curves exceedence flow high 6.—Standardized Figure is the discharge; 50%Q is the median discharge. stations for period of record. Q is the discharge; gauge Information from US Geological Survey

121 95 Au Sable 90 85 80 75 70 Percent exceedence 65 e 60 Commerc Ann Arbor Hayes Creek S. Ore Creek Portage Creek Mill Creek 55 50 0 8 6 4 2 0

1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.

median flow median Standardized discharge (Q / 50%Q) / (Q discharge Standardized Figure 7.—Standardized low flow exceedence curves for the mainstem Huron River at Commerce and Ann Arbor and for four major tributaries. tributaries. major four for and Arbor Ann and Commerce at River Huron mainstem the for curves exceedence flow low 7.—Standardized Figure is the discharge; 50%Q is the median discharge. stations for period of record. Q is the discharge; gauge Information from US Geological Survey

122 0 e i g Commerc Milford New Hudson Hambur Dexter Ann Arbor Ypsilant Percent exceedence Au Sable 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5 0 0 0 0

4. 3. 2. 1.

Standardized discharge (Q / 50%Q) / (Q discharge Standardized median flow median Figure 8.—Standardized high exceedenceflow curves for locations seven on the Information Huron from River. US Geologicalgauge Survey is the discharge; 50%Q is the median discharge. stations for period of record. Q is the discharge;

123 95 Au Sable 90 85 80 75 70 Percent exceedence 65 e i g 60 Commerc Milford New Hudson Hambur Dexter Ann Arbor Ypsilant 55 50 0 8 6 4 2 0

1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.

median flow median Standardized discharge (Q / 50%Q) / (Q discharge Standardized Figure 9.—Standardized low flowexceedence curves for seven locations on the Huron Information River. from US Geological Surveygauge is the discharge; 50%Q is the median discharge. stations for period of record. Q is the discharge;

124 US Geological Survey gauging station

Ratio Classes 1.0 - 2.0 very good 2.1 - 5.0 good 5.1 - 10.0 fair > 10.1 poor

Milford Commerce

4.75 4.17 6.87 8.57 4.50

Pinckney

South Lyon Hamburg

25.91 6.64 Dexter

9.3 Chelsea

Ann Arbor

Ypsilanti

10.18 Belleville 6.61

Flat Rock N

W E

Lake Erie

S

Figure 10.—Flow stability patterns in the Huron River watershed, calculated from miscellaneous and short-time frame data from the US Geological Survey. Specific ratios for each gauge station are indicated. 125 3 5 10 7 9 2 4 1 8 6

1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Low monthly flow yield

8 1 7 5 6 10 4 9 2 3

2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 High monthly flow yield

8 1 10 2 3 6 9 7 4 5

40 35 10 5 0 Ratio of high monthly flow yield : low monthly flow yield

1 Huron R. @ Commerce 8 Mill Ck. near Dexter 2 Huron R. @ Milford 9 Huron R. @ Ann Arbor 3 Huron R. @ New Hudson 10 Huron R. @ Ypsilanti 4 South Ore Creek near Brighton N. Br. Kawkawlin River 5 Huron R. near Hamburg near Kawkawlin 6 Portage Ck. near Pinckney White River @ White Hall 7 Huron R. near Dexter Au Sable River @ Grayling

Figure 11.—Low and high monthly flow yields and their ratios for 10 sites in the Huron River watershed and the north branch of the Kawkawlin River, the White River, and the Au Sable River. Solid symbols indicate trout stream. 126 24 16 3-22-90 8 24 Hour 16 3-21-90 8 0

500

2500 2000 1500 1000 Cubic feet per second per feet Cubic Figure 12.—Daily discharge patterns at Ann Arbor, downstream of , for March 21-22, 1990 (data from US Geological Survey) illustrating flow instability at this location. Straight line is the two-day average discharge at this gauge. at this discharge average instability at this location. Straight line is the two-day illustrating flow

127 s 136 Headwater 119 102 93.46 5 River mile h 0 17 34 51 68 8 0 Mout

20 10

100

) Gradient (feet per mile per (feet Gradient Figure 13.—Gradient (elevation change in feet per mile) of the Huron River. Gradient is shown without existing dams or lake-level control structures.

128 10.0-69.9 Great Lakes Hydro Impoundment River 5.0-9.9 Gradient class (ft/mi) Gradient 3.0-4.9 0.0-2.9

0.0

90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 River miles River Figure 14.—Gradient classes and length of river in each, separated by water type, for the Huron River. in each, separated by water Figure 14.—Gradient classes and length of river

129 70.0-149.9 Impoundment Flowage River 10.0-69.9 5.0-9.9 Gradient class (ft/mi) Gradient 3.0-4.9 0.0-2.9

5.0 0.0

35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 River miles River Figure 15.—Gradient classes and length of river in each, separated by water type, for the Huron River mainstem from Big Lake to Commerce Lake.

130 10.0-69.9 Impoundment River 5.0-9.9 Gradient class (ft/mi) Gradient 3.0-4.9 0.0-2.9

5.0 0.0

35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 River miles River Figure 16.—Gradient classes and length of river in each, separated by water type, for the Huron River mainstem from Commerce Lake to Baseline (Flook) Dam.

131 5.0-9.9 River 3.0-4.9 Gradient class (ft/mi) Gradient 0.0-2.9

5.0 0.0

35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 River miles River Figure 17.—Gradient classes and length of river in each, separated by water type, for the Huron River mainstem from Baseline (Flook) Dam to Barton Impoundment.

132 10.0-69.9 Hydro Impoundment River 5.0-9.9 Gradient class (ft/mi) Gradient 3.0-4.9 0.0-2.9

5.0 0.0

35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 River miles River Figure 18.—Gradient classes and length of river in each, separated by water type, for the Huron River mainstem from Barton Impoundment to French Landing Dam.

133 5.0-9.9 Great Lakes Impoundment River 3.0-4.9 Gradient class (ft/mi) Gradient 0.0-2.9

5.0 0.0

35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 River miles River Figure 19.—Gradient classes and length of river in each, separated by water type, for the Huron River mainstem from French Landing Dam to Lake Erie. Dam to Lake

134 Metro Park

State Recreation Area Indian Springs State Game Area Highland Pontiac Lake

Island Lake Huron Meadows

Brighton Milford Gregory Pinckney Unadilla

Pinckney Proud Lake

South Lyon Kensington

Hudson Mills Dexter

Lower Huron Ann Arbor

Ypsilanti

Delhi Dexter-Huron Belleville Waterloo Chelsea

Flat Rock Willow N

Oakwoods

W E Lake Erie

S Point Mouillee

Figure 20.—State of Michigan and Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority lands in the Huron River watershed. 135 Pontiac Lake

Milford

Kent Lake Stocked trout fishery Proud Lake

Hudson Mills - Delhi Smallmouth bass fishery Barton Argo Geddes Dexter Superior

Ann Arbor Ford Ypsilanti Belleville

Angler days per year Belleville *(Following rotenone + restocking)

100,000 Flat Rock 50,000

Potamodromous fishery 10,000 downstream of Flat Rock

Figure 21.—Fishing pressure along the Huron River. Data from Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, creel census. 136 17, 43, 69, 73, 75, 76 23 Commerce Milford 77

55, 62, 74 4 21 25, 26 5 46 Pinckney 3, 15, 41 South Lyon Hamburg

50 8, 22, 59

Dexter 20, 31, 33, 37, 60, 65 24 Chelsea 58 6, 13, 19, 32, 35, 42, 44, 48, 54, 64, 67, 71, 72, 78, 79, 80 57 14, 16, 39, 63 Ann Arbor

Ypsilanti 7, 9, 10, 11, 34, 45, 51, 52, 66, 68 12, 29, 30, 40 Belleville

61 1, 27, 47, 49 Flat Rock N 56

W E 53 70 Lake Erie 2, 18, 28, 36 S

Figure 22.—Locations of point source discharges subject to National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Numbers correspond to the companies listed in Table 21. 137 Second quality cold water

Top quality warmwater

Second quality warmwater

Milford Commerce

Pinckney

Hamburg South Lyon

Dexter

Chelsea

Ann Arbor

Ypsilanti

Belleville

Flat Rock N

W E Lake Erie

S

Figure 23.—Fisheries Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, stream classifications, 138