MILITARY MULTIMODAL ACCESS STRATEGY

Final Report

October 2019 | DRAFT

Executive Summary The San Diego region is home to the largest concentration of military assets in the world, supporting a robust ecosystem of over 384,000 active duty military personnel, civilian employees, and veterans. This "defense cluster” generates significant economic benefit for the region, but also adds considerable demand on the transportation network, particularly near military facilities. Finding solutions has been difficult due in part to:

• Legal/Policy framework between military installations and adjacent jurisdictions • Leadership and staff turnover to maintain awareness and utilization of alternative commute programs • Location of military facilities and housing • Limited commute options that support military needs

Added demand on the transportation network exacerbates traffic-related impacts in the region affecting national security, increasing greenhouse gas emissions, and impacting livability. Collaboration among stakeholders is critical to identifying solutions. To address these challenges and ensure the region can sustain and support future military growth, the Military Working Group (MWG) developed a Multimodal Military Access Strategy (Strategy). Based on the data and input collected, the Strategy aims to:

• Develop a process to collaborate and prioritize transportation improvements to support both military and local needs • Identify access improvements that benefit multiple stakeholders • Develop recommendations and next steps to guide the MWG • Serve as a model for other regions to coordinate transportation solutions with the military or other employers with dispersed campuses.

What’s in this document? The Project Inventory was compiled through stakeholder interviews, a literature review, a stakeholder workshop, Project Development Team (PDT) input, and the sessions with MWG. The inventory represents the multimodal transportation improvements (infrastructure projects and programs) needed to improve access to installations throughout the region. A set of Top Projects was developed to further identify which projects reflect the MWG’s mission, vision, and values. These top projects are not prioritized, but could be reassessed as funding opportunities become available. In addition, a dynamic project inventory (Screening Tool) was developed to enable stakeholders to sort the project list based on key variables – such as project cost or relevant jurisdiction – to improve strategic collaboration, funding opportunities, and partnerships.

Table 1. Strategy Snapshot

237 7 24 90 Total Projects Project Top Projects Projects Benefit 2+ Identified Types Identified Military Installations Projects that benefit more than one military installation were identified to support more competitive grant applications. This criterion, among others, was applied in the prioritization process to determine Top Projects.

Executive Summary FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

A comprehensive framework of Regional Strategies and Actions was identified to guide the MWG’s future decision making. The key strategies and summarized actions are briefly outlined below. Regional Strategies Strategy #1: Support Agency Collaboration The MWG should align the efforts of project supporters and problem solvers to address military multimodal access challenges in various sub-regions of San Diego.

Recommended Actions: • Integrate military installation representatives into the project development teams (PDT) and committees for local projects that may impact the military’s multimodal access • Create a shared calendar that highlights known grant cycles and major planning document schedules

Strategy #2: Advocate for MWG Projects The MWG projects would benefit base access and personnel mobility, but are often “long-term” improvements due to their regional nature. The MWG’s projects need advocacy to accelerate implementation.

Recommended Actions: • Regularly present MWG priorities to all levels of government including local councils, SANDAG Regional Planning Committee (RPC), SANDAG Board of Directors, state agencies, and federal agencies • Package projects in ways that can be easily communicated to relevant stakeholders • Push for MWG priority projects to be elevated in each agency’s list of priorities

Strategy #3: Pursue Funding from Outside Sources Funding is a major component of implementing the MWG’s priority projects and is often supplemented by grants or funds from regional, state, and/or federal agencies. By partnering to access available funding, the MWG can help advance projects more quickly.

Recommended Actions: • Have a standing grant update item on MWG meeting agendas • Form a subcommittee with local partners to coordinate when grant opportunities arise • Provide resources to develop a list of high priority projects with necessary details to be “grant ready” • Provide letters of support for MWG projects seeking grant funding

Strategy #4: Maintain MWG Project Inventory Maintaining quality project data is critical for the MWG to quickly respond to new funding opportunities as they arise.

Recommended Actions: • Assign “inventory coordinator” from MWG to take responsibility of the list • Update the list with new projects and remove completed projects periodically • Create new “project priority” list prior to SANDAG Regional Plan updates

Executive Summary FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Introduction

Background The San Diego region is home to the largest concentration of military assets in the world, supporting a robust ecosystem of over 143,000 active duty military personnel and civilian employees, 241,000 veterans and retirees, and generates significant economic benefit for the region. The defense cluster represents one of every five jobs in the region and 20 percent of San Diego’s gross regional product.1 The breadth of the military presence in San Diego extends beyond facility boundaries. It is a major driver across multiple economic sectors including technology, health care, shipbuilding, manufacturing, and tourism. Military families – both on and off-base – are active Image Credit: SDMAC 2018 Military Economic Impact Study members of the community and depend on an efficient transportation network for all daily life, like all people in the region.

With continuous yearly growth and the Navy’s plan to homeport an additional five ships in the region in FY 2020, traffic congestion surrounding military facilities is projected to increase. Military-related traffic congestion impacts the demand on the regional and local transportation network; contributes to the region’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; and affects the military’s ability to move goods, equipment, and personnel that are essential to national security. Improvements that address local and regional mobility not only benefit local jurisdictions that are impacted by military congestion, but the military’s mission readiness and resilience. Partnerships among impacted stakeholders are essential to facilitate strategic infrastructure and program improvements to address these regional issues.

The Military Multimodal Access Strategy As the region’s Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), is uniquely positioned to bring together stakeholder representatives from public transportation agencies, local jurisdictions, and military facilities to address shared goals for regional mobility. Adopted in 2015, San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan) charts a course for how land use decisions and transportation investments can provide increased travel choices, meet future travel demand, and lower GHG emissions. The Military Multimodal Access Strategy (Strategy) is a near-term action identified in the Regional Plan to enhance planned regional transportation investments with supporting regional and local projects, operational improvements, and programs that facilitate access to the region’s diverse and dispersed military facilities. Finding solutions to these mobility challenges has been difficult due in part to:

• Legal/Policy framework between military installations and adjacent jurisdictions • Leadership and staff turnover to maintain awareness and utilization of alternative commute programs • Location of military facilities and housing • Limited commute options that support military needs

To address these challenges and ensure the region can sustain and support future military growth, the Military Working Group (MWG) developed the Strategy which aimed to achieve the following:

• Develop a process to collaborate and prioritize transportation improvements to support both military and local needs • Identify access improvements that benefit multiple stakeholders • Develop recommendations and next steps to guide the MWG • Serve as a model for other regions to coordinate transportation solutions with the military or other employers with dispersed campuses.

Introduction FINAL REPORT Page | 1 October 2019 | Draft

History of the Regional Military Coordination SANDAG created a framework to guide collaboration among the military, local Table 1. jurisdictions, and transportation agencies through a Memorandum of Agreement Military Working Group Members (MOA) between the U.S. Department of Defense and SANDAG (see Appendix J). The MOA includes the addition of a Department of Defense advisory position on the Marine Corps Installation West SANDAG Board of Directors to provide input on issues of mutual interest. The MOA Navy Region Southwest was updated in 1986 and again in 2017 to reflect the formation of the San Diego Navy Facilities Engineering Command Regional MWG and changing conditions in the region. Marine Corps Recruitment Depot U.S. Coast Guard San Diego Sector Military Working Group City of Oceanside Given continued military growth and influence in the region, SANDAG established the City of San Diego MWG in 2013 to address regional issues as they relate to the military. The MWG City of Coronado includes representatives from all military branches with installations in the region, City of National City adjacent local jurisdictions, as well as the Port of San Diego and SANDAG (Table 1). City of Imperial Beach The MWG allows for these stakeholders to coordinate programs and address issues County of San Diego of mutual concern. Port of San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) Other Regional Stakeholders North County Transit District (NCTD) In addition to the stakeholders on the MWG roster, the San Diego Airport Authority SANDAG and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 11 are responsible for land and infrastructure adjacent to military facilities or impacted by military operations.

SANDAG and the Military Working Group’s 2018 Workshop was attended by representatives from the region’s military installations, local governments, transportation agencies, SANDAG staff, non-profits, and the general public. Attendees discussed transportation projects that could improve mobility in and around military facilities. Communication and collaboration between stakeholders is critical to developing consensus on a cohesive vision for the region.

Introduction FINAL REPORT Page | 2 October 2019 | Draft

Project Area The Strategy encompasses the entire San Diego region (Figure Table 2. Major military installations in the San Diego Region 1). The Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard each oversee Military Installations military installations within San Diego County. The majority of the 12 military facilities in the region are clustered in and around Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (Camp Pendleton) downtown San Diego, largely along the region’s coastline. In Marine Corps Air Station Miramar (Miramar) 2018, an estimated 57,000 sailors and Coast Guard personnel Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego (MCRD) were stationed in San Diego.2 Over 27,000 civilian employees Naval Base Coronado (NBC) support these downtown facilities and add to an already Naval Base Point Loma (NBPL) congested urban center. Camp Pendleton, which has a daily U.S. Coast Guard population of 80,000 personnel is located along the coast north Naval Base San Diego (NBSD) of the City of Oceanside and while less urban than downtown San Diego, is also constrained by limited access. In addition to geographic limitations, factors including policy constraints and a housing shortage cause many military employees and supporting personnel to live far from these facilities, exacerbating long daily commutes. This challenge is shared by employees throughout the region; the resulting congestion, as people commute to concentrated employment centers, impacts the regional and local transportation networks, including the streets and highways that provide access to military facilities.

Figure 1. Project Area

Introduction FINAL REPORT Page | 3 October 2019 | Draft

Growth Today, the region is home to more than 3.2 million people. Projected growth of the general population and the military population will have a significant impact on the regional transportation network. Forecasted Regional Growth The SANDAG Regional Growth Forecast, adopted by the SANDAG Board of Directors in 2013, projects that the region’s population will grow by nearly a million people by 2050,3 including approximately 460,000 more jobs and over 325,000 more housing units. To accommodate this growth, SANDAG is planning for infill development and intensification of existing land uses within urban communities and along key transportation corridors. The Regional Plan envisions higher densities in the western third of the region, which is where military installations are located. Military Growth The region’s military community is projected to continue growing based on national defense policies and plans. The total number of active duty personnel and civilians employed by the military has increased by about 5% from 2016 to 2018 (Table 3).

The U.S. Department of Defense is increasing the military workforce in the San Diego region as a part of its “Rebalance to Pacific” military strategy. This national defense strategy focuses on expanding and intensifying U.S. military presence in the Asia-Pacific region by moving forces, including ships, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The region’s extensive military assets play an important part in executing this strategy due to their location, extensive training and operation facilities, and the large number of military personnel already based in the region. Today, one out of every six sailors and one out of every four marines in the nation are stationed in San Diego4.

As a result of “Rebalance to the Pacific,” the region’s military sector and related industries such as shipbuilding will experience significant growth. The total number of military personnel is projected to grow to 151,000 in FY 2020, an increase of 7,500 over the previous year. The addition of just one of the at least three aircraft carriers planned to homeport in San Diego as part of this effort is expected to generate more than $800 million, and typically requires 3,200 personnel.

Table 3. Number of military personnel for each military branch in the region, FY2016-2018 Percent Change Military Branch 2016 2017 2018 (2016-2018) Navy 55,239 53,489 57,041 3% Marines 51,556 51,877 53,451 4% Department of Defense Civilians 21,549 20,356 20,518 -5% Department of Defense Reserves 6,278 7,348 7,435 18% Coast Guard 717 717 820 14% TOTAL 135,339 133,787 139,265 3% Source: SDMAC MEIS (2019)

Introduction FINAL REPORT Page | 4 October 2019 | Draft

Housing A robust supply chain of federal employees, military personnel, military families, civilian employees, private contractors, and veterans make up the San Diego “mega military cluster”. Military personnel, including contractors, can have temporary or short-term commitments (such as training or shore duty) or long-term commitments. Short and long-term commitments affect the region’s economy and transportation network as it causes variances in the military population within the region at any given time, as well as the goods, services, and supporting jobs.

Understanding the commuting patterns of the region’s military community is key to evaluating the existing regional travel demand. Commuting patterns are influenced by various factors including housing, parking availability, cost, travel time, and available mobility options. Military personnel, their families, and contractors reside throughout the region and outside the region. Housing options include on- base housing varying from barracks to ships in port, off-base military housing, or other housing options in local jurisdictions. Based on iCommute Commuter Survey data, a large number of military personnel live in jurisdictions in East and South San Diego County, and in Riverside and Orange counties (Figure 2).

Department of Defense policy outlines that local housing markets need to support military housing needs within adjacent communities. The San Diego region housing supply is not keeping pace with the demands of increasing military personnel. Although on-base housing is available aboard ships and in military barracks for lower-ranking personnel, basic housing allowance permits higher ranking personnel and their families to live within the local community. There is military family housing on some bases, but military housing needs are supported throughout the local communities. High housing costs are not only a constraint for military personnel but also are a challenge for employee retention for private contractors. Off-base military housing is available, but requires commute trips to each military installation.

While providing more on-base or base-adjacent housing will alleviate some commutes, increased travel options and alternative commute programs can reduce reliance on, and the cost of, personal vehicles while reducing congestion. Policy constraints, a strong personal vehicle culture, and the limitations of the existing public transportation system are some of the challenges to alternative commutes for the military community. SANDAG’s iCommute program – described in the following section – works with military leadership to address these challenges and promote more sustainable commute options, including pilot programs focused on the military.

“Challenges to Housing Enlisted Personnel”

In 2009, Naval Base San Diego built Pacific Beacon, large-scale, privatized luxury on-base housing for unaccompanied senior ranking sailors. The project struggled because its target market preferred to live off base. This was compounded by turnover caused by frequent deployments, completed enlistments, and transfers. The Navy began leasing to junior sailors, but their lower salaries were a barrier to the higher rent. Pacific Beacon is part of the Navy’s “Homeport Ashore” effort to house fewer junior sailors in uncomfortable conditions on ships.

Introduction FINAL REPORT Page | 5 October 2019 | Draft

Figure 2. Military Personnel Origin

Introduction FINAL REPORT Page | 6 October 2019 | Draft

SANDAG and iCommute SANDAG’s Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program, On-base Commuter Resource Center iCommute, coordinates with employers, including military commanders, to In anticipation of redevelopment at the Navy Broadway promote alternative commute options for their personnel in order to reduce Complex that would displace 1,000 parking spaces, traffic congestion and cut GHG emissions and other environmental SANDAG’s iCommute staff worked closely with NBSD pollutants that result from driving. The program provides resources for leadership to inform and support personnel about their shared mobility programs in the region, including bikeshare, shared electric alternative commute options. scooters, carshare and on-demand ridesharing. Some of these programs are only available in the local jurisdiction adjacent to each military In the summer of 2018, Navy Broadway Complex opened a installation; however, ongoing collaboration has encouraged several pilot Commuter Resource Center where employees can pick up projects to allow access to these shared mobility programs. resources from iCommute, MTS, and NCTD including transit maps, schedules, regional bike maps, and learn about the iCommute conducts commuter surveys with several military facilities in the federal Transportation Incentive Program (TIP), which region to learn how military personnel and civilian employees commute, offsets transit expenses for Navy personnel. As of the what alternative transportation options they are aware of, and which of the summer of 2019, 240* Navy Broadway Complex personnel options they would be willing to try. Using this information, iCommute report using carpool/vanpools and 658 participate in other develops direct marketing initiatives to promote and raise awareness of alternative commute programs including Active TIP/Federal alternative commute options among military and civilian personnel. TDM Program, Flex Schedules, and Telework. Feedback from this survey also includes origin-destination feedback which provides an understanding of employee commute distances. *Vanpoolers are also counted in TIPS

Table 4. iCommute Assistance Programs Service Description

Assists local businesses with developing and Employer implementing customized employee commuter benefit Services programs that lower costs, increase productivity, and Program help the environment.

Provides commuter groups of five or more with a subsidy of up to $400 a month to offset the cost of a vehicle Vanpool lease, which comes with insurance and maintenance. Program Members of the military and federal employees can also receive up to $260 per month for vanpool costs.

Offers a safety net for commuters who carpool, vanpool, take transit, walk, or bike to work by providing a free ride Guaranteed home up to three times per year in the event of a family

Ride Home emergency or illness, unscheduled overtime, or being Piloting the Nation’s First Military Carpool Incentive stranded at work due to carpool or vanpool driver leaving for an emergency. In 2018, iCommute partnered with military bases around the region to provide free Waze Carpool rides Supports the regional bike network and facilitates bike to and from each base for one month. Participants were Bike commuting by hosting Bike to Work Day events, funding matched with companions who were verified to live or Encouragement mini-grants in support of Bike Month events, offering work on a base. The program aimed to reduce Program complimentary employer bike services, and producing congestion by providing an additional commute option the San Diego Regional Bike Map. for employees and subsidizing driver commute costs for those willing to share the ride. Waze Carpool Provides partners with a wide range of marketing benefits participants were also eligible to use regional iCommute and exposure to regional decision makers, employers, infrastructure including Park & Ride lots, Express Lanes Partnership the public, and iCommute participants in return for cash and carpool lanes. Program donations, in-kind contributions that have an equivalent cash value, or a combination of both.

Introduction FINAL REPORT Page | 7 October 2019 | Draft

Funding Each military installation develops budget priorities through a Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process to identify military construction priorities (MILCON). Through congressional authorization and appropriations, a portion of these priorities are funded. Chapter 169 of Title 10, United States Code, contains most of the laws governing military construction matters and specifies requirements for project authorization. Congress requires project-by-project authorization and appropriation for military construction projects.

State and local agencies are responsible for developing and maintaining public roads to meet normal defense needs adjacent to military bases. Due to jurisdictional boundaries and funding constraints, partnerships for projects supporting both military installations and local jurisdictions can be challenging. Under certain conditions, the Defense Access Road (DAR) Program provides a means for the Department of Defense to pay its share for public highway improvements resulting from sudden or unusual defense-generated impacts. Eligibility for this program includes: 1) doubling of defense-related traffic, 2) new connections to military installations, 3) roads capable of accommodating heavy/oversized vehicles, and 4) replacement roads closured for military necessity. This program is not a funding program, rather a mechanism to transfer MILCON appropriations through the treasury to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for local jurisdictions to plan, design and construct projects outside military installations. Due to the increasing needs for military priority projects and limited funding appropriated by Congress, military installations are looking for new ways to maximize operating and maintenance budgets by partnering with local jurisdictions through Joint Agency Intergovernmental Service Agreements. There also are innovative ways the military has been able to leverage existing military assets through public-private partnerships for development.

While some grant cycles occur on a regular basis, other funding opportunities are not as predictable and can emerge rapidly. In order for funding applications to compete against other well-qualified projects, it is important to identify strong partnerships and shared visions. This Strategy was developed for the MWG to respond to funding and partnership opportunities quickly to support these critical opportunities.

“Leveraging Existing Military Assets to Support San Diego Economy and Military Goals”

The Manchester Financial Group is redeveloping 3 million square feet of waterfront property that has been occupied by the Navy for almost 100 years. The $1.3 billion mixed-use plan replaces the existing Navy Broadway Complex and leverages 12 acres of public land. The new development includes a 372,000 square foot Navy Region Southwest headquarters, office towers, a hotel, retail space, and a museum. Under the terms of a 99-year lease with the United States government, Manchester Financial Group is building a new 17-story Class A office building for the U.S. Navy Region Southwest headquarters in exchange for development rights. This project estimates $12 million per year of Transient Occupancy Tax revenue, $10 million a year of property tax to the County of San Diego, $15 million a year in sales tax, and more than $14 million in Development Impact Fees. The new U.S. Navy Region Southwest headquarters will lose a significant number of parking spaces from its original capacity, and although not required on federal projects, it will abide by city code for this new development and encourage utilization of alternative transportation options in Downtown San Diego.

Introduction FINAL REPORT Page | 8 October 2019 | Draft

Summary of Regional Military Challenges Through extensive research, the project team cultivated a list of existing conditions that stakeholders consider barriers to project and program implementation. As outlined in the Table 5, policy limitations underpin the overarching constraints affecting regional military coordination. Challenges specific to individual military facilities are documented in the Briefing Book (Appendix A). This research helped to inform the Strategy and the identification of key multimodal transportation projects and programs to improve military mobility in the region.

Table 5. Summary of Regional Military Challenges Funding Congress requires project-by-project authorization and appropriation for military construction projects Regional Military Construction (MILCON) funds focus on items that are mission essential, and annual budgets for bases Admin primarily fund small maintenance projects

Partnerships for projects supporting both military installations and local jurisdictions can be challenging

Misc Limited funding for additional security guards at existing gates causes congestion at existing access points

Programs and Collaboration

The framework of military contracts, which require a competitive bidding process, can be a barrier to partnering with the private sector for streamlined pilot programs Climate Action Plans only allow credit for trips that originate or end within a jurisdiction; improvements that mitigate or address traffic passing through a jurisdiction to a military base is ineligible Admin The San Diego Airport Authority is not a member of the MWG despite the close proximity between the San Diego Airport and military installations, and there is no military representation on the Board of Directors of the local transit agencies

High turnover in staff/leadership and the loss of the Employee Transportation Coordinator position make it difficult to raise awareness about Transportation Demand Management programs

Due to security concerns or dynamic local threat levels, projecting growth can be difficult to align with the regional forecasting Misc process

Mobility and Housing

Housing costs and bureaucratic constraints - such as restrictions on living south of the U.S. Mexico border, an insufficient housing subsidy, or the DOD discouraging housing personnel on ships- make it difficult for personnel to live near their assigned facility Only transit and vanpool qualify for the Transportation Incentive Programs (TIPS), making it difficult to encourage other Admin alternative commutes like Carpool or On-Demand Rideshare Helmets are required on-base for people riding bikes, which may deter people from biking Differences in rules governing access to bases for military personnel and contractors make mobility programs difficult to coordinate Varying military work schedules don't align with schedule-based mobility options like transit and carpool/vanpool

1 San Diego Military Advisory Council Military Economic Impact Study (2019) 2 SDMAC MEIS(2019) 3 SANDAG Regional Growth Forecast (2013) 4 SDMAC MEIS (2017)

Introduction FINAL REPORT Page | 9 October 2019 | Draft

Developing Tools to Leverage Opportunities New funding opportunities and potential partnerships often emerge rapidly. However, competition for external dollars at the federal, state, and local levels is increasingly high. Several tools were developed to help the MWG stakeholders optimize their ability to implement multimodal solutions in the region and maximize opportunities.

The Project Inventory (Appendix B) represents a region-wide catalogue of transportation improvements—both infrastructure and non-capital projects—that could help address multimodal access needs to military installations and alleviate congestion on local roadways surrounding military installations. This comprehensive inventory of over 230 projects, which was developed through an extensive outreach process and review of local planning documents (Appendix C), was then prioritized to identify highest priority projects that supported the MWG’s Mission, Vision, and Values within each geographic region. This pre-screened and condensed inventory of 24 In 2019, the Senate Appropriations Committee allocated $75 million in projects (Top Projects List) enables the MWG to pursue its fiscal 2020 Defense spending bill for funding critical off-base emerging opportunities in an efficient and strategic manner. A infrastructure projects that support mission readiness and resilience. brief description of the Prioritization Process is described in the The Strategy was developed to enable a rapid strategic response to next section and is documented in Appendix D. funding opportunities that arise. Appendix G identifies additional

potential funding sources. In addition, an interactive project tool (Screening Tool) was developed to allow stakeholders to quickly identify projects potentially eligible for emerging opportunities, focusing more time on the application process and less on project identification. This dynamic resource, which will be continuously updated by the MWG, enables users to search the comprehensive Project Inventory for opportunities that match with desired parameters such as project cost, location, and/or type (Appendix E).

Table 6. Strategy Snapshot

237 7 24 90 Total Projects Project Top Projects Projects Benefit 2+ Identified Types Identified Military Installations Projects that benefit more than one military installation were identified to support more competitive grant applications. This criterion, among others, was applied in the prioritization process to determine Top Projects.

Developing Tools to Leverage Opportunities FINAL REPORT Page | 10 October 2019 | Draft

Project Inventory Categories

• Safe Routes to School • Urban Trails • Bike Wayfinding • Bike Wayfinding Active Transportation • Pedestrian Crossings • Pedestrian Crossings • Pedestrian / Bike Connection • Bike Signals Projects • Class I/II/III/IV Bike Lanes • Improving Pedestrian/Bike Environment 59 • Multi-Use Paths through traffic calming elements

• Freeway connectors / direct connection • Operational improvements • Improve Freeway Access • General Purpose Lanes Freeway & Highway • Freeway Lanes • High Occupancy Vehicle Connectors

Projects • Managed Lanes • Freight / goods movement 67 • Freeway connector

• Safe Routes to School • Grade separated improvements • Port of Entry Improvements • Road Bridge Improvements Local Street / • Traffic Calming Elements that did not specify • Corridor Improvements for multiple travel pedestrian/bike enhancement (e.g. speed modes Road Projects tables) • Road widenings • Traffic Signal Improvements Intersection • Median installment / improvements 41 Improvements (e.g. signalized intersection) • Grade separated improvements

• Freight Rail Improvements (e.g. staging area, • COASTER extensions / improvements rail storage facilities) • Freight / goods movement • Track upgrades • Frequency enhancements for existing Trolley Rail Projects • Intermodal Transit Center (location associated) lines • Double-tracking • Expanding Trolley lines 22 • SPRINTER focus improvements • Rail grade separations for a specific Trolley line

• Park & Ride Facility • New transit service to connect neighborhoods • Transit Center Improvements • Route extension • Projects with specific objectives to improve • Expand existing transit service to new areas 39 Transit Projects efficiency and reliability of transit services

• Shuttle system • Streetcar/shuttle loop or connection

Micromobility

7 Projects

• Develop TDM program to connect military Transportation housing to military installations Demand Management • Public-Private Partnership to develop military housing close to installations Programs / Land Use • On-base housing Projects • Rezone for affordable housing 7 There are 237 projects in the Project Inventory. Some projects are categorized into more than one project type. Types of projects in the Project Inventory include but are not limited to the examples listed above.

Developing Tools to Leverage Opportunities FINAL REPORT Page | 11 October 2019 | Draft

Prioritization

Following the creation of the Project Inventory, a Military Working Group’s Mission, Vision, and Values (MVV) prioritization methodology was created to help The Strategy seeks to facilitate dialogue and find common highlight which of the 237 projects aligned most closely with the MWG’s goals and would be most ground between the military installations in San Diego County and competitive in an application process for local, adjacent local communities related to the region’s transportation state, or federal funding. To that end, multimodal system. projects that benefitted more than one stakeholder were given primary consideration. Military bases need the transportation system to support mission readiness through the safe movement of personnel while also The MWG’s Mission, Vision, and Values were operationalized as screening criteria to further enhancing the quality of life of service members. Nearby local determine projects that best addressed jurisdictions need to operate and maintain transportation facilities congestion relief, safety, and transportation in a state of good repair that equitably serve the needs of all options. community members including residents, employees, and Although the comprehensive Project Inventory is businesses. The Strategy contributes towards a transportation still a critical resource, the 24 Top Projects, system that improves safety for all users while reducing travel equally distributed across the region in order to times, vehicle miles travelled (VMT) and greenhouse gas ensure equitable stakeholder representation, (GHG) emissions as outlined in Caltrans Sustainable Community facilitate the MWG’s rapid response to funding and partnership opportunities as they arise. Grant requirements.

Prioritization Methodology The recommended prioritization methodology is a three-step approach involving the following steps:

1) Identify projects that align with MWG Mission, Vision, and Values (MVV). The Project Inventory was screened to identify projects that meet the MWG’s mission, vision, and values. The Project Inventory was reviewed to identify projects that meet the following: • Directly benefits at least two stakeholders, including one military installation and one local jurisdiction • Improve multimodal travel • Project is adequately defined to proceed to detailed evaluation 2) Detailed evaluation for screened Project Inventory After the screening in step one was complete, the projects that passed the screening were then evaluated based on the criteria approved by the MWG and PDT. A point system was determined for each criterion and used to help create a differentiation among projects and help identify projects of priority for the MWG. Transportation professionals reviewed the screened Project Inventory on the following criteria: • Congestion Relief • Increased Safety • Increased Transportation Options 3) MWG Validation of Ranked Project Inventory The MWG members were asked to validate the projects at the top of the list based on the detailed evaluation performed in step two. This allowed for the MWG to provide feedback and confirm projects, and if necessary, replace projects on the prioritized Project Inventory.

A detailed methodology which outlines the coordination and step-by-step process by which prioritization was applied to the Project Inventory is documented in Appendix D.

Prioritization FINAL REPORT Page | 12 October 2019 | Draft

Top Project List Categories

• Class I Bikeway • One-Way Class IV Bikeway Active Transportation • Bike Lane Expansion Projects • Urban Trail 5 • Widening of SR 75 Bike Lane

• Managed Lanes / High-Occupancy Tolling Lanes • Direct Access Ramps Freeway & Highway • High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes 8 Projects • BRT Lane

• Corridor Studies • Bridge Local Street / • Traffic Signal Updates and Synchronization Road Projects • Multimodal Corridor Improvements 7 • Road Widening

• Double-tracking • Trolley Line Frequency Enhancements 2 Rail Projects

• New Transit Connection 1 Transit Projects

• Shuttle System 1 Micromobility Projects

Prioritization FINAL REPORT Page | 13 October 2019 | Draft

Top Project List The following lists the top projects identified by the MWG. Facility, project extents, project description, project type, relevant military and jurisdiction stakeholders, draft costs in year of expenditure (YOE), and source of project are included in the table.

DISCLAIMER: Costing Methodology is currently being refined. Costs are DRAFT.

Draft Relevant Relevant Project Cost Facility Project Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction Source PID Extents ($YOE); Stakeholder Stakeholder Millions** NORTHERN PROJECTS Add two managed lanes (Existing 6 freeway lanes to 6 freeway lanes + 2 SANDAG Freeway and Camp Oceanside, L-122 SR 78 I-5 to I-15 managed lanes with improvements) to Regional Plan Highway Pendleton Carlsbad 2,248 create an alternative freeway option and (2015) increase vehicle throughput Fall 2018 Widening of the I-5 with the addition of a Workshop SR 78 to new interchange direct access ramp Freeway and Camp L-161 I-5 Oceanside Camp Harbor Drive specifically for High Occupancy Vehicles Highway Pendleton 148 Pendleton (HOV) from SR 78 to Harbor Drive Table December 2018 East Local Street / Camp Workshop P-76 Mission TBD Widening of one lane in each direction. Oceanside Road Pendleton 31 Camp Road Pendleton Table December One component of a broader proposal to 2018 San Diego do a 'corridor study' for the I-15 to Fallbrook Local Street / Camp Workshop P-74 I-15 Fallbrook Gate County, Gate and look at different solutions that Road Pendleton 754,800 Camp Oceanside could include a P&R among other ideas. Pendleton Table December Bridge connecting Melrose Dr and N River 2018 From Melrose Rd over existing river. Oceanside Planner Melrose Local Street / Camp Workshop P-40 Dr to N River noted that there would be no transit Oceanside Dr Road Pendleton 25 Camp Rd planned until a third bridge was built on Pendleton Melrose Table CENTRAL PROJECTS Add two managed lanes (Existing 8 freeway lanes to 8 freeway lanes + 2 SANDAG Freeway and Miramar, City of San L-40 I-15 I-8 to SR 163 managed lanes with improvements) to 106 Regional Plan Highway NBSD, NBC Diego create an alternative freeway option and (2015) increase vehicle throughput Oceanside, Carlsbad, Double tracking the LOSSAN corridor Encinitas, between Oceanside and Downtown San Solana Beach, Diego for increased reliability and Camp Del Mar, City of Oceanside convenience (Allows for 20-minute off-peak Pendleton, San Diego, SANDAG Transit Center frequencies and would include grade Broadway, Oceanside, L-76 Route 398 Rail 1,698 Regional Plan to Downtown separations at Leucadia Blvd, MCRD, NBPL, Carlsbad, (2015) San Diego stations/platforms at Convention Coast Guard, Encinitas, Center/Gaslamp Quarter and Del Mar NBSD Solana Beach, Fairgrounds, and extension to Camp Del Mar, City of Pendleton) San Diego, Port of San Diego December Add class I bikeway (separated and 2018 Rosecrans Active City of San L-167 I-5 to Lytton St dedicated for bicycles) as shown in the NBPL Workshop St Transportation Diego 5 Midtown Community Plan Update NBPL MCRD CG Table December Camino Santa Add a one-way class IV (buffered and Carroll Active City of San 2018 L-187 Fe to Miramar separated) bikeway to each side of the Miramar Road Transportation Diego 1 Workshop Rd roadway to create a safer bike network Miramar

Top Project List FINAL REPORT Page | 14 October 2019 | Draft

Draft Relevant Relevant Project Cost Facility Project Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction Source PID Extents ($YOE); Stakeholder Stakeholder Millions** December Black Mira Mesa Expand the Bike Lane on Black Mtn Rd to Active City of San 2018 L-190 Mountain Blvd to Miramar create a safer bike network Transportation Diego 1 Workshop Road Miramar Rd Miramar NBPL, City of San Miramar, December Diego, La Broadway, 2018 I-5 to East Managed or High-Occupancy Tolling Lanes Freeway and Mesa, Lemon L-164 I-8 Naval Medical 25 Workshop County on I-8 from I-5 to East County Highway Grove, El Center, NBSD, NBPL MCRD Cajon, San Coast Guard, CG Table Diego County NBC Create an alternative freeway option and increase vehicle throughput by adding managed lanes to the I-5. • (L-52, L-53) SR 78 to Vandegrift Blvd: Add four managed lanes to existing 8 freeway lanes • (L-50, L-51) Manchester Ave to SR 78: Add four managed lanes to existing 8 freeway lanes Oceanside, • (L-49) SR 56 to Manchester Ave: Add two Carlsbad, managed lanes to existing 8 freeway lanes Encinitas, and 2 managed lanes Solana Beach, • (L-48) I-5/I-805 Merge to SR 56: Add two Miramar, Del Mar, City of managed lanes to existing 8 freeway Camp SANDAG Vandegrift Blvd Freeway and San Diego, ML-1 I-5 lanes/14 freeway lanes and 2 managed Pendleton, 12,000 Regional Plan to SR 905 Highway Oceanside, lanes NBPL, NBC, (2015) Carlsbad, • (L-47) La Jolla Village Dr. to I-5/805 NBSD Encinitas, Merge: Add two managed lanes existing 8 Solana Beach, freeway lanes/14 freeway lanes Del Mar, City of • (L-46) I-8 to La Jolla Village Dr: Add two San Diego managed lanes existing 8 freeway lanes/10 freeway lanes • (L-43) I-15 to I-8: Add Operational Lanes to existing 8 freeway Lanes • (L-44) SR-54 to SR-15: Add 2 freeway lanes and 2 managed lanes to existing 8 freeway lanes • (L-120) SR-905 to SR-54: Add 2 Managed Lanes to existing 8 freeway lanes Add High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane exit into Miramar with potential of adding December Miramar Way express lane access for HOV traffic and Freeway and City of San 2018 P-72 I-15 Miramar 23 Exit on I-15 reversible gates to match peak direction to Highway Diego Workshop increase vehicle throughput and create an Miramar Table alternative freeway option Synchronize traffic signals to improve traffic December flow and speed. Add Signal Priority for City of San 2018 Rosecrans I-5 to NBPL Local Street / L-168 transit vehicles to improve public transit NBPL, MCRD Diego, Port of 1 Workshop St Gate Road efficiency from the I-5 to the Naval Base San Diego NBPL MCRD Point Loma Gate CG Table Miramar College and May 2019 Sorrento Valley Connect Miramar to Miramar College and City of San P-82 TBD Micromobility Miramar 8 Military COASTER Sorrento Valley COASTER station Diego Working Group station to Miramar Point Loma to Provide a transit connection from Point City of San SANDAG Kearny Mesa NBPL, MCRD, L-100 Route 28 Loma to Kearny Mesa via Old Town, Linda Transit Diego, Port of 144 Regional Plan via Old Town, Miramar Vista San Diego (2015) Linda Vista SOUTHERN PROJECTS Add two managed lanes (Existing 8 Naval Medical freeway lanes to 8 freeway lanes + 2 City of San SANDAG Freeway and Center, L-74 SR 94 I-5 to I-805 managed lanes with improvements) to Diego, National 1,009 Regional Plan Highway Broadway, increase vehicle throughput and provide an City, Coronado (2015) NBSD, NBC alternative freeway option

Top Project List FINAL REPORT Page | 15 October 2019 | Draft

Draft Relevant Relevant Project Cost Facility Project Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction Source PID Extents ($YOE); Stakeholder Stakeholder Millions** National City National City, Harbor Drive to Active Downtown L-146 8th Street Urban trail NBSD Port of San 12 D Avenue Transportation Specific Plan Diego (2017) SR 75 in Imperial May 2019 Imperial Beach Widen SR 75 Bike Lane (Serves Commuter Active NBC, SSTC, L-199 SR 75 Beach, 9 Military to 3rd Street in and Recreational Purposes) Transportation NOLF Coronado Working Group Coronado SR 75 Palm Ave from I-5 to Imperial May 2019 Carpool/BRT Lane on SR 75 Palm to Freeway and L-200 SR 75 NOLF and NOLF, SSTC Beach, 1 Military NOLF or Coastal Campus Highway Coastal Coronado Working Group Campus December 2018 Over Connecting Workshop Silver Ocean and Bridge connecting Ocean and Bay side of Local Street / L-181 NBC Coronado 46 NBC Table; Strand Bay sides of NAB Road May 2019 Blvd NAB Military Working Group Tenth Avenue Harbor Drive Multimodal Corridor Marine Improvements, including but not limited to: Terminal in improvements at 32nd Street and Vesta National City, SANDAG Harbor Local Street / L-111 San Diego and Street; pedestrian crossings and bridges; NBSD Port of San 802 Regional Plan Drive Road the National various truck improvements; bikeway Diego (2015) City Marine accommodations; street scape, safety, and Terminal parking improvements Install a bridge over Harbor Drive to Caltrans enhance flow of traffic on Naval Base San National City, District System Vesta Over Harbor Local Street / L-133 Diego, reduce congestion on Harbor Dr, NBSD Port of San 250 Management Street Drive Road and close the network-gap in the active Diego Plan (DSMP) transportation system (2015) Imperial Phase I: Blue Line frequency Beach, enhancements to improve convenience NBPL, MCRD, National City, SANDAG Palomar St to and reliability and rail grade separations at Coast Guard, L-83 Route 510 Rail Chula Vista, 387 Regional Plan 12th & Imperial 28th St, 32nd St, E St, H St Palomar St, Broadway, City of San (2015) and Blue/Orange Track Connection at NBSD Diego, Port of 12th/Imperial to improve nearby traffic flow San Diego Methodology for estimated costs is currently being refined. All costs are DRAFT.

Top Project List FINAL REPORT Page | 16 October 2019 | Draft

!P-76 !P-74

!P-40

L-161

L-122

L-76

0 3 6 12 P-82 Miles L-187 L-190! !P-82 !P-72 Legend ML-1

Planned Project Improvements L-40 Transit

Local Streets/Roads L-100 Freeways and Highways L-164 Active Transportation L-167 Rail and Light Rail L-168 L-74 L-111 ! Local Streets/Roads L-133 L-146 L-181 Freeways and Highways L-199 ! L-83 ! Micromobility L-200 Military Facility N

17 FINAL REPORT October 2019 | DRAFT

Regional Strategies and Actions

Key strategies were identified to guide future decision making towards solutions that address the needs identified as part of the Military Multimodal Access Strategy. The strategies and actions presented below provide an outline for considering how the MWG can engage with stakeholders to support projects and decisions that address the military’s priorities in the San Diego region. The strategies identified in this document are:

1. Support collaboration across jurisdictions and transit agencies to address military multimodal access challenges and ensure mission compatibility 2. Advocate for MWG priority projects with local, regional, state, and federal partners 3. Pursue funding sources that draw outside investment into the region 4. Maintain an accurate and comprehensive inventory of MWG transportation projects

These strategies are intended to provide a framework to achieving the MWG transportation goals, while supporting the military mission.

Strategy #1: Support Agency Collaboration The MWG should align the efforts of project supporters and problem solvers to address military multimodal access challenges in various sub-regions of San Diego. Proactive collaboration should provide a regional viewpoint to otherwise local projects and help bring neighboring jurisdictions to the table in order to expand any projects’ impact across jurisdictional boundaries. Through deliberate collaboration, the MWG can act as a strong voice for widening the lens of local projects during project initiation, development, and public comment.

• Recommended Actions: o Integrate military representatives into the project development teams and committees for local projects that may impact the military’s multimodal access

Projects are consistently discussed and planned across the region. The MWG shall remind members to review annual capital improvement plans (CIPs) from local jurisdictions at the beginning of every fiscal year (July) for projects that may affect military mobility. Projects identified that may affect more than one stakeholder shall be collaboratively discussed and addressed during the quarterly MWG meeting or through formation of a subcommittee to assess adverse impacts and also allow for the synchronization of mobility measures. Those projects that may adversely impact the military mission shall be collaboratively discussed and addressed via a subcommittee or joint meeting such as with the Regional Planning Committee.

o Have a standing update agenda item on MWG meetings to inform the group of major planning document initiations There are dozens of regular processes that are initiated every year that impact transportation related issues. While many of these could be used to advance the goals of the MWG, it can be difficult to track and develop a proactive approach to monitor these processes. MWG staff shall develop a shared calendar that identifies when major planning processes are initiated. This calendar shall be updated on a rolling basis as new opportunities and relevant activities are identified and discussed at each quarterly MWG meeting.

Strategy #2: Advocate for MWG Projects The MWG projects have transformational potential for base access and personnel mobility. Many of these projects are regional in nature and are often characterized by longer project development timelines due to the number of stakeholders involved in developing, approving, and permitting a project. As such, many of these projects fall into “long-term” improvement categories that are recognized as important but struggle to advance towards implementation.

Regional Strategies and Actions FINAL REPORT Page | 18 October 2019 | Draft

• Recommended Actions: o Regularly present MWG priorities to all levels of government including local councils, SANDAG Regional Planning Committee (RPC), and SANDAG Board of Directors

The MWG should regularly engage with stakeholders at all levels of government to communicate its goals and establish partnerships. One way this could be achieved is through the creation of an annual State of Military Mobility Report that can be presented to governing bodies. This report would restate the goals of the MWG, highlight the accomplishments of the previous year towards advancing transportation access, communicate the future transportation needs of military installations, and identify priority projects that the MWG would like stakeholders to consider partnering on.

o Advocate for MWG priority projects in each agency’s list of priorities Every agency has a different methodology for prioritizing future improvements. By leveraging collaboration efforts, the MWG and representatives should learn how agencies evaluate projects and identify MWG priorities that align with those evaluation processes. By highlighting alignment with agency goals, MWG projects may be re-prioritized for implementation at an earlier time horizon.

Strategy #3: Pursue Funding from Outside Sources Funding is a major component of implementing MWG projects – often times local funding is supplemented by grants or funds from regional, state, and federal agencies. As a major economic engine in the region, the military commands attention when it raises the profile of an issue or project. The military has a strong local reputation given that its reach impacts almost every resident. By partnering to access external funding sources, the needed resources can be leveraged to bridge the gap between current funding priorities and MWG projects.

• Recommended Actions: o Have a standing grant update agenda item on MWG meetings Grants represent a large opportunity for military projects to receive funding from outside the region. A challenge with grants is that they sometimes have irregular cycles, short solicitation periods, and vague/complex requirements. The MWG shall have a standing agenda item to discuss grant opportunities due to their importance in the implementation of many of the priority projects and to ensure dialogue is initiated among potential partners. An initial listing of grant opportunities is identified in Appendix G.

o Form subcommittee, as appropriate, with local partners to coordinate when there are grant opportunities for MWG priority projects

Grants sometimes require a significant amount of collaboration across stakeholders and often times need a public jurisdiction as a lead agency. Once a grant opportunity is identified for a MWG project, an ad-hoc subcommittee should be formed to work through the application process and prepare necessary grant documentation. This subcommittee will facilitate quick communication amongst stakeholders and allow for the division of labor as it relates to the completion of the application.

o Provide letters of support, as appropriate, for MWG transportation projects seeking grant funding Most grant applications require or are enhanced with letters of support from stakeholders. MWG members should provide, as appropriate and permissible, support letters or letters of acknowledgment to projects that benefit military stakeholders.

Strategy #4: Maintain Working Group Project Inventory The MWG represents a broad cross-section of transportation stakeholders and as such, the project inventory is large and diverse. Maintaining quality project data is critical for the MWG to quickly respond to new opportunities as they arise. The initial top 20 projects shown in the Prioritization section of this report were developed by the MWG for reference and context.

• Recommended Actions: o Assign an “inventory coordinator” from MWG to take responsibility of the Project List

Regional Strategies and Actions FINAL REPORT Page | 19 October 2019 | Draft

Because the project inventory requires regular maintenance in a consistent format, a singular inventory coordinator should be assigned with adding, removing, and modifying projects in the inventory. SANDAG is well positioned as a major stakeholder due to its role on the MWG and its institutional technical expertise to fulfill the role of inventory coordinator.

o Update the list with new projects and remove completed projects annually Having accurate data in the project inventory is important to keep it relevant as a resource into the future. Over time, projects will be completed or become non-applicable while new project needs will emerge. It would be important for the MWG members to periodically re-engage the methodology outlined in Appendix D to select new projects to focus on as projects from the initial Top 20 list are implemented. The inventory coordinator should coordinate with MWG representatives to document project inventory changes annually. For ease of completion and review, each MWG representative should receive the relevant list of projects and provide comments on how this smaller list should be altered. Edited lists will then be reassembled by the inventory coordinator and distributed to the full updated MWG membership list. This process should be completed prior to the budgetary process in the spring of every year.

o Create new Top Project list prior to every Regional Transportation Plan update Because of the regional nature of many of the MWG priority projects, the compilation of SANDAG’s Regional Transportation Plan is a particularly relevant planning process to engage. Prior to the initiation of the RTP, the MWG should reapply the Prioritization Methodology detailed in Appendix D to the project inventory. This process will generate an updated list of MWG Top Projects that may be relevant to the RTP process. Using the updated priority list, the MWG can collaborate with stakeholders and advocate for the representation of military needs in the RTP.

Regional Strategies and Actions FINAL REPORT Page | 20 October 2019 | Draft

Look Ahead: The Military and the 5 Big Moves The military presence in San Diego county has a profound economic benefit in the region. By implementing the strategies outlined in this document, stakeholders can continue to foster growth while minimizing transportation impacts. In 2019, SANDAG introduced “The 5 Big Moves” that highlight the region’s strategic priorities for the future transportation system in the county. These priorities have significant overlap with those identified by military stakeholders in the Strategy. The alignment between the 5 Big Moves and the Strategy are highlighted below.

Complete Corridors Most military installations are located in urbanized areas that have mature roadway networks. This urban maturity restricts the ability for the roadways to be widened for additional automobile travel without significant financial outlays and impacts to the community. The concept of complete corridors focuses on optimizing travel routes through enhanced technology, modal choice options, and increased focus on demand management. Complete Corridor components are highlighted throughout the Strategy’s project list and represent a significant collaborative opportunity between SANDAG and the MWG.

Transit Leap Because of the needs for secure base access and the dispersed internal movements on base, military bases are difficult to serve with transit that is useful to users and competitive with automotive travel. The concept of a Transit Leap is to provide public transportation services that are time competitive with, or faster than, driving alone. There are several transit improvements identified in the Strategy, from new micro-mobility service to dedicated bus lanes, that would incentivize some of the over 100,000 military related daily trips in the region to utilize transit. Strategic investments in the transit system stand to benefit military communities and the region at large.

Mobility Hubs Much of the barriers to military commuters using alternative modes of transportation is a difficult first/last mile connection. The concept of Mobility Hubs is to enhance the reach of transit by offering amenities, improved access via street improvements, and services to users. Strategic investments in hub improvements near military housing and facility access points can help to provide options for travelers to use alternative modes.

Flexible Fleets Due to the unique geography, secure access, and commute patterns of military facilities, conventional transit vehicles can find it difficult to serve the military community. The concept of Flexible Fleets aims to utilize multiple vehicle types to better serve the unique needs of users in the transportation system. Neighborhood electric vehicles, passenger vans, and microtransit shuttles all have particular characteristics that make providing transportation options to bases and on base more feasible and efficient.

Next OS Often it is difficult for users to know all the transportation options available to them. The large number of different services also present barriers to adopting and utilizing services without planning ahead. The Next OS concept will consolidate trip planning and payment systems into one mobile application that will provide a seamless experience for users to utilize any number of modes provided by any number of operators on a single trip.

Look Ahead: The Military and the 5 Big Moves FINAL REPORT Page | 21 October 2019 | Draft

Appendix A

Briefing Book

APPENDIX A FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Briefing Book As part of the Regional Military Multimodal Access Strategy, the Briefing Book synthesizes existing conditions for land use, transportation, and travel data as well as documents research and stakeholder interviews in order to develop the final Strategy document.

Through extensive research and stakeholder interviews, the Briefing Book documents:

• Existing military partnerships • Commuting patterns of military and civilian personnel • Existing transportation options within the vicinity of regional military installations • Challenges affecting mobility as it relates to regional military installations

The information provided will be used to develop the final Strategy document, which will identify key multimodal transportation projects and programs that will improve mobility for military facilities while meeting regional, state, and federal goals.

The link to the full Briefing Book can be found here: https://www.sandag.org/index.asp?committeeid=104&fuseaction=committees.detail

APPENDIX A FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Appendix B

Project Inventory

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Project Inventory Table 1 lists the projects identified by the MWG. Facility, project extents, project description, project type, relevant military and jurisdiction stakeholders, draft costs in 2014, 2019 and year of expenditure (YOE), and source of project are included in the table. The methodology for estimating costs is currently under review and subject to change. The costs shown in the table are draft and being finalized based upon the updated methodology for estimating costs.

Table 1. MWG Project Inventory

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Uptown - SANDAG Active Naval Medical City of San L-1 Hillcrest to Bicycle Facilities 3 4 4 Regional Transportation Center Diego Balboa Park Plan (2015) National City, National City SANDAG Active National City, L-108 Marina to Bayshore Bikeway NBSD 2 2 2 Regional Transportation Port of San 32nd St Plan (2015) Diego Broadway, Downtown SANDAG Downtown to Southeast Active NBSD, Naval City of San L-11 San Diego to 3 4 6 Regional connections Transportation Medical Diego Golden Hill Plan (2015) Center Class II bike lanes on City of Orange southbound Silver Strand Coronado Silver Avenue to Boulevard with enhanced Active Bike Plan / L-134 Strand NBC Coronado 0.03 0.04 0.10 Avenida Las intersection crossings to Transportation Bicycle Boulevard Arenas connect to Silver Strand Master Plan bike path. (2011) Class II bike lanes along City of Alameda Boulevard with Coronado Ocean Alameda High Visibility Activated Active Bike Plan / L-135 Boulevard to NBC Coronado 0.10 0.13 0.32 Boulevard Crossings (HAWK) signals Transportation Bicycle First Street at the intersections at Master Plan Third and Fourth Street (2011) Class II bike lanes along H City of Avenue with High Visibility Coronado Olive Avenue Activated Crossings Active Bike Plan / L-136 H Avenue NBC Coronado 0.14 0.18 0.45 to First Street (HAWK) signals at the Transportation Bicycle intersections at Third and Master Plan Fourth Street (2011) Class II bike lanes along B City of Avenue with High Visibility Coronado Ynez Place to Activated Crossings Active Bike Plan / L-137 B Avenue NBC Coronado 0.15 0.19 0.48 First Street (HAWK) signals at the Transportation Bicycle intersections at Third and Master Plan Fourth Street (2011) Class III bike route along D Avenue with Shared City of Lane Bicycle Markings Coronado First Street to (Sharrows) and Active Bike Plan / L-138 D Avenue NBC Coronado 0.04 0.05 0.13 Tenth Street intersection improvements Transportation Bicycle such as enhanced Master Plan crosswalks at Third and (2011) Fourth Street City of Coronado, Coronado Silver Tarawa Road Active Coronado, Bike Plan / L-139 Strand & Tulagi Bicycle signals NBC 0.02 0.02 0.05 Transportation Port of San Bicycle Bike Path Road Diego Master Plan (2011)

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Pac Hwy (W SANDAG Washington Coastal Rail Trail San Active Coast Guard, City of San L-14 4 5 8 Regional St to Laurel Diego Transportation MCRD Diego Plan (2015) St) 0.03 City of Coronado, Coronado Silver Active Coronado, Bike Plan / L-140 Strand Tulagi Road Bicycle signals NBC 0.04 0.09 Transportation Port of San Bicycle Bike Path Diego Master Plan

(2011)

The project will construct a multi-use path, traversing City of San portions of two City of San Diego Diego communities, City of San Capital Dorothy Southeastern San Diego Diego, City of Chollas Active Improvemen L-142 Petway Park and Barrio Logan. The NBSD San Diego, - - - Creek Transportation t Program to Harbor Dr project runs from the Port of San (CIP GIS Dorothy Petway Diego Shapefile) Neighborhood Park at its (2017) eastern terminus to Harbor Drive Imperial Bayshore Class II Bike lanes Beach 13th Bike path to connecting the Bayshore Active Capital L-144 NOLF None - - - Avenue Tower Bikeway to the Imperial Transportation Improvemen Road/Iris Ave Beach airbase t Program (CIP) (2016)

National City, National City Harbor Drive Active National City, Downtown L-146 8th Street Urban trail NBSD - 5 12 to D Avenue Transportation Port of San Specific Plan Diego (2017)

Cycle Track on 8th Street National City, National City Harbor Drive between Harbor Drive and Active National City, Downtown L-147 8th Street to Roosevelt Roosevelt Avenue, NBSD - 0.30 1 Transportation Port of San Specific Plan Avenue connection with Bayshore Diego (2017) Bikeway and NBSD Class I multi-use path on west side of Harbor Drive City Center from Civic Center Drive to National City, National City Harbor Drive to Northern City Limits and Active National City, Downtown L-148 NBSD - 2 4 Drive Northern City Class II bicycle lane on Transportation Port of San Specific Plan Limits east side of Harbor Drive Diego (2017) from Civic Center Drive to Northern City Limits

National City Civic Center Road diet to allow for McKinley Active SMART L-149 Drive to 19th widening of sidewalks and NBSD National City - 1 2 Ave Transportation Foundations Street Class II bike lanes. (2014)

City of San Pac Hwy Diego, Port of SANDAG (Laurel St to Coastal Rail Trail San Active Coast Guard, San Diego, L-15 8 9 15 Regional Santa Fe Diego Transportation Broadway City of San Plan (2015) Depot) Diego, Port of San Diego

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Prepare an Environmental Oceanside Oceanside Impact Report for Coastal Capital Coastal Active Camp L-150 Boulevard to Rail Trail Project, a two- Oceanside - 0.21 0.21 Improvemen Rail Trail Transportation Pendleton Morse St. way pedestrian and t Program bicycle path (CIP) (2017) West Broadway, from railroad City of San Port Capital North to Harbor Diego, City of North Embarcadero Vision Active Improvemen L-152 Embarcad Drive, and Broadway San Diego, - 32 32 Plan Transportation t Program ero Harbor Drive, Port of San (CIP) (2014) from West Diego Broadway to B Street City of San Diego, Chula Caltrans Vista, District Add Pedestrian Over National City, San Ysidro to System Crossing (POC) Active City of San L-155 I-5 Downtown NBSD 2 2 2 Managemen Americans with Disabilities Transportation Diego, Chula San Diego t Plan Act (ADA) upgrades Vista, (DSMP) National City, (2015) Port of San Diego City of Coronado NAS North Class III bike route with Ocean Active Bike Plan / L-156 Island to RD Shared Lane Bicycle NBC Coronado - 0.10 0.25 Boulevard Transportation Bicycle Dada Place Markings (Sharrows) Master Plan (2011) North Class I bike path should December boundary of be along the entire Coast 2018 Camp within Camp Pendleton Active Camp Workshop L-158 Coastline Oceanside - 28 71 Pendleton to (west of I-5) open to the Transportation Pendleton Camp south public. Bike path should Pendleton boundary be the extent of the base. Table Pac Hwy (Taylor St to SANDAG Coastal Rail Trail San Active City of San L-16 W MCRD, NBPL 4 5 8 Regional Diego Transportation Diego Washington Plan (2015) St) December 2018 Planned - Class I Bike Rosecran I-5 to Lytton Active City of San Workshop L-167 (Shown in the Midtown NBPL - 2 5 s St St Transportation Diego NBPL Community Plan Update) MCRD CG Table City of San Diego, Port of SANDAG Active San Diego, L-17 Barrio Logan Bayshore Bikeway Broadway 19 22 36 Regional Transportation City of San Plan (2015) Diego, Port of San Diego December Pacific 2018 Witherby St Hwy, Add bike lanes and Active City of San Workshop to Tuscaloosa MCRD, NBPL - 2 5 Barnet sidewalks/trails Transportation Diego NBPL St Ave MCRD CG L-174 Table

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Increase in bike access to the base. Needs to December continue or further County of Active 2018 develop the access Miramar San Diego, - 0.20 1 Transportation Workshop proposed along Carroll Santee Miramar Canyon with access to the L-176 base. Pedestrian overpass to Over Connecting avoid crossing SR75 and Coronado, December Silver Ocean and to connect both sides of Active Coronado, 2018 NBC - 18 46 Stand Bay sides of NAB since training is on Transportation Port of San Workshop Blvd NAB one side and food is on Diego NBC Table L-181 the other side. Coronado, December Bayshore Bikeway - wider Active Coronado, 2018 shoulder for commuters, NBC - 4 11 Transportation Port of San Workshop recreation, pedestrian L-182 Diego NBC Table December Camino Carroll One-way class IV, both Active City of San 2018 Santa Fe to Miramar - 0.30 1 Road sides Transportation Diego Workshop Miramar Rd L-187 Miramar December Active City of San 2018 2-way class IV southside Miramar - 0.10 0.25 Transportation Diego Workshop L-188 Miramar Protected Bike Lanes or December Miramar Cycle Track on Southside, Active City of San 2018 I-15 to I-805 Miramar - 2 6 Road Turn Westbound bike lane Transportation Diego Workshop L-189 into cycle track Miramar National City, Chula Vista, Port of San Chula SANDAG Active Diego, Vista/National Bicycle Facilities None 11 13 21 Regional Transportation National City, City Plan (2015) Chula Vista, Port of San L-19 Diego December Black Mira Mesa Black Mtn Rd. Expansion Active City of San 2018 Mountain Blvd to Miramar - 1 1 of Bike lane Transportation Diego Workshop Road Miramar Rd L-190 Miramar The westside sidewalk only connects to the bus From the stop at Harbor Drive. December intersection of Need to extend sidewalk 2018 Harbor Santa Fe Dr and potentially add Active Camp Workshop Oceanside - 0.20 1 Drive and Harbor crosswalks into the Transportation Pendleton Camp Dr to south community to facilitate Pendleton Harbor Dr pedestrian access Table between the community L-195 and Del Mar Gate From east of National City, December Bay I-5 to gates Provide an active Active National City, 2018 NBSD - 0.30 1 Marina Dr on Terminal transportation connection Transportation Port of San Workshop L-198 Ave Diego NBSD Table SR 75 in May 2019 Imperial Widen SR 75 Bike Lane Imperial Active NBC, SSTC, Military SR 75 Beach to 3rd (Serves Commuter and Beach, - 4 9 Transportation NOLF Working Street in Recreational Purposes) Coronado Group L-199 Coronado

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Pershing and El Prado - SANDAG Active Naval Medical City of San North Park to Bicycle Facilities 7 8 9 Regional Transportation Center Diego Downtown Plan (2015) L-2 San Diego City of San Diego, Port of Ocean Beach SANDAG Active San Diego, to Mission Bicycle Facilities NBPL, MCRD 24 28 45 Regional Transportation City of San Bay Plan (2015) Diego, Port of L-27 San Diego Pershing and SANDAG Active Naval Medical City of San El Prado - Bicycle Facilities 1 1 1 Regional Transportation Center Diego Cross-Park Plan (2015) L-3 Sweetwater County of SANDAG River Active Bicycle Facilities NBSD San Diego, 9 11 17 Regional Bikeway Transportation National City Plan (2015) L-30 Ramps City of San Harbor Dr NBPL, Coast Diego, City of SANDAG (Downtown to Active Guard, Bicycle Facilities San Diego, 7 8 13 Regional Ocean Transportation Broadway Port of San Plan (2015) Beach) Complex L-35 Diego I-15 Bikeway SANDAG – Murphy Active City of San Bicycle Facilities Miramar 40 47 118 Regional Canyon Rd to Transportation Diego Plan (2015) L-36 Affinity Ct E J St from SANDAG 2nd Ave to Active Bay to Ranch Bikeway NBSD Chula Vista 12 14 35 Regional Paseo Del Transportation Plan (2015) L-37 Rey San Ysidro to Imperial SANDAG Bayshore Bikeway Active Imperial NOLF, SSTC Beach, City of 9 10 11 Regional Connection Transportation Beach San Diego Plan (2015) L-4 Includes Safe Routes to Transit projects at new transit station areas, local bike projects, local SANDAG Various pedestrian/safety/traffic Active All All 857 1,001 1,617 Regional Locations calming projects, regional Transportation Plan (2015) bicycle and pedestrian programs and Regional Safe Routes to School P-12 implementation. Includes Safe Routes to Transit projects at new transit station areas, local bike projects, local SANDAG Various pedestrian/safety/traffic Active All All 368 430 453 Regional Locations calming projects, regional Transportation Plan (2015) bicycle and pedestrian programs and Regional Safe Routes to School P-13 implementation.

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * City of Coronado Wayfinding Sign Plan for Active Capital Coronado Citywide active NBC Coronado - - 1 Transportation Improvemen transportation programs t Program (CIP) (2016) P-16 Analyze geometric configurations of the irregular intersection of City of Tenth Street and Alameda Coronado 10th at Alameda Boulevard to determine if Active Capital NBC Coronado - - 0.06 Street Boulevard the intersection can be Transportation Improvemen reconfigured to enhance t Program pedestrian crossing and (CIP) (2016) calm traffic speeds on P-17 Alameda Boulevard. City of San Diego Capital Upgrade curb ramps, City of San 32nd Norman Scott Active Improvemen install ped countdown NBSD Diego, Port of - - - Street Rd Transportation t Program timers San Diego (CIP GIS Shapefile) P-20 (2017) City of San Diego New ADA ramps, new Capital light poles on the bridge, Nimitz Along Nimitz Active City of San Improvemen remove existing chain link NBSD - - - Bridge Bridge Transportation Diego t Program gates, rehabilitate (CIP GIS guardrails Shapefile) P-21 (2017) Traffic calming measures such as corner bulb-outs, pedestrian actuated flashing crossing signs National City and high intensity striping, Capital National Active new lighting and NBSD National City 1 1 1 Improvemen City Transportation pedestrian curb ramps for t Program ADA compliance to (CIP) (2017) enhance safety and access at 14 existing P-24 crosswalk Citywide

Wayfinding Sign Plan for National City Citywide active Capital National Active National City, transportation programs NBSD 1 1 1 Improvemen City Transportation Port and a designated truck t Program route (CIP) (2017) P-25

National City National City, Harbor Pedestrian and bicycle Active Downtown at 8th Street NBSD Port of San - 3 8 Drive connections to NBSD gate Transportation Specific Plan Diego (2017) P-27

Port Capital National Throughout National City Wayfinding Active Improvemen NBSD National City - 0.31 0.31 City National City Signage Project Transportation t Program (CIP) (2014) P-32

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * December Intersection 2018 San Diego Mission of Mission Rd Park and Ride at Mission Active Camp Workshop County, - 2 4 Road and E Vista Rd and East Vista Wy Transportation Pendleton Camp Oceanside Wy Pendleton P-39 Table Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach, Del Camp Mar, City of Oceanside Double tracking (20- Pendleton, San Diego, Transit SANDAG Route minute peak frequencies Broadway, Oceanside, Center to COASTER 445 520 547 Regional 398 and 120-minute off-peak MCRD, Carlsbad, Downtown Plan (2015) frequencies) NBPL, Coast Encinitas, San Diego Guard, NBSD Solana Beach, Del Mar, City of San Diego, Port of San L-75 Diego Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, Double tracking (20- Solana minute off-peak Beach, Del frequencies, grade Camp Mar, City of Oceanside separations at Leucadia Pendleton, San Diego, Transit SANDAG Route Blvd, stations/platforms at Broadway, Oceanside, Center to COASTER 900 1,051 1,698 Regional 398 Convention MCRD, Carlsbad, Downtown Plan (2015) Center/Gaslamp Quarter NBPL, Coast Encinitas, San Diego and Del Mar Fairgrounds, Guard, NBSD Solana and extension to Camp Beach, Del Pendleton) Mar, City of San Diego, Port of San L-76 Diego Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach, Del Camp Mar, City of Oceanside Double tracking Pendleton, San Diego, Transit (completes double SANDAG Route Broadway, Oceanside, Center to tracking; includes Del Mar COASTER 1,365 1,594 4,011 Regional 398 MCRD, Carlsbad, Downtown Tunnel) plus 2 grade Plan (2015) NBPL, Coast Encinitas, San Diego separations) Guard, NBSD Solana Beach, Del Mar, City of San Diego, Port of San L-77 Diego Location confirmed. December Significant development 2018 Camp Camp around this area. Camp Camp Workshop Pendleton Pendleton Pendleton confirmed COASTER Oceanside - 5 12 Pendleton Camp Station Station station is not being used. Pendleton Reconsider using station Table P-38 for commuter access.

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Naval Medical SANDAG Freeways and Center, City of San L-118 I-5 SR-15 to I-8 Operational Improvements 1,177 1,375 3,459 Regional Highways Broadway, Diego Plan (2015) NBSD, NBC City of San Diego, Imperial Beach, Chula Add 2 Managed Lanes to SANDAG SR-905 to Freeways and SSTC, NOLF, Vista, City of L-120 I-5 8 Freeway Lanes (8F to 308 360 581 Regional SR-54 Highways NBSD San Diego, 8F + 2ML) Plan (2015) Imperial Beach, Chula Vista, Port of San Diego SANDAG Add general purpose Freeways and City of San L-121 SR 56 I-15 to I-5 Miramar 141 165 414 Regional lanes Highways Diego Plan (2015)

Add two managed lanes Freeways and Camp Oceanside, L-122 SR 78 I-5 to I-15 1,192 1,392 2,248 f (6F to 6F + 2ML) Highways Pendleton Carlsbad Naval Medical SANDAG Add two managed lanes ( Freeways and Center, City of San L-123 SR 94 I-805 to I-15 - 308 775 Regional 8F to 8F + 2ML) Highways Broadway, Diego Plan (2015) NBSD, NBC Caltrans California Freeways and Naval Medical City of San L-125 I-5/SR-94 North to East Freeway connector 131 153 385 Freight Highways Center Diego Mobility Plan (2014) Caltrans East to North California Freeways and City of San L-126 I-5/ I-8 and South to Freeway connector NBPL, MCRD 323 377 949 Freight Highways Diego West Mobility Plan (2014) Camp Pendleton, City of San Caltrans Miramar, Diego, San California Lake Hodges Add 2 General Purpose Freeways and MCRD, Coast Diego L-127 I-15 232 271 682 Freight to SR-78 Lanes Highways Guard, County, Mobility Plan NBSD, Naval Oceanside, (2014) Medical Coronado Center, NBC Caltrans California I-805 to Add 2 General Purpose Freeways and City of San L-128 SR-905 None 202 236 594 Freight Mexico Lanes Highways Diego Mobility Plan (2014) Caltrans California Add 4 General Purpose Freeways and City of San L-129 SR-905 I-5 to I-805 SSTC 157 183 461 Freight Lanes Highways Diego Mobility Plan (2014) Caltrans Naval Medical Los Coches California Add 2 General Purpose Freeways and Center, San Diego L-130 I-8 to Dunbar 131 153 385 Freight Lanes Highways Broadway, County Road Mobility Plan NBSD, NBC (2014)

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Caltrans District I-5 to SR-54 System West to Add High Occupancy Freeways and City of San L-131 I-5 NBSD, NBC 121 141 356 Managemen South and Vehicle Connectors Highways Diego t Plan North to East (DSMP) (2015) Caltrans District I-5 to SR-15 NBPL, System North to North Add High Occupancy Freeways and City of San L-132 I-5 MCRD, Coast 197 230 579 Managemen and South to Vehicle Connectors Highways Diego Guard t Plan South. (DSMP) (2015) December 2018 SR 76 should be widened Freeways and Camp Workshop L-160 SR 76 I-5 to Melrose to 6 lanes from I-5 to Oceanside - 24 59 Highways Pendleton Camp Melrose Pendleton Table December I-5 widening with new 2018 SR 78 to interchange direct access Freeways and Camp Workshop L-161 I-5 Oceanside - 59 148 Harbor Drive ramp HOV from SR 78 to Highways Pendleton Camp Harbor Drive Pendleton Table Camp Oceanside, Pendleton, December Carlsbad, Miramar, 2018 Camp ML/HOT Lanes on I-5 Encinitas, Freeways and MCRD, Coast Workshop L-163 I-5 Pendleton to from Pendleton to Solana - 15 36 Highways Guard, NBPL, NBPL Downtown Downtown Beach, Del NBSD, Naval MCRD CG Mar, City of Medical Table San Diego Center, NBC NBPL, City of San December Miramar, Diego, La 2018 Broadway, I-5 to East ML/HOT Lanes on I-8 Freeways and Mesa, Lemon Workshop L-164 I-8 Naval Medical - 10 25 County from I-5 to East County Highways Grove, El NBPL Center, Cajon, San MCRD CG NBSD, Coast Diego County Table Guard, NBC December City of San 2018 Time Limited Carpool Diego, City of Rosecran I-5 to NBPL Freeways and Workshop L-166 Lane to improve peak NBPL, MCRD San Diego, - 1 2 s St Gate Highways NBPL period HOV lane on I-5 Port of San MCRD CG Diego Table December 2018 New highway MCRD, I-5 to Freeways and City of San Workshop ramp/connection from I-5 NBPL, Coast - 11 28 Sassafrass St Highways Diego NBPL to Sassafrass St Guard MCRD CG L-172 Table

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * City of San Diego, National City, Chula Vista, MCRD, Imperial December NBPL, I-8 to Palm Need HOV Lane or Toll Freeways and Beach, City of 2018 I-5 Broadway, - 8 20 Ave Lanes on I-5 south of I-8. Highways San Diego, Workshop NBSD, NBC, National City, NBC Table SSTC, NOLF Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, Port L-184 of San Diego Coronado, Imperial December Beach, SR 75 signal Freeways and NBC, SSTC, 2018 SR 75 SR 75 Coronado, - 1 1 synchronization Highways NOLF Workshop Imperial NBC Table Beach, Port L-191 of San Diego City of San December Need HOV Lane or Toll Freeways and NBSD, SSTC, Diego, 2018 I-805 I-8 to SR 54 Lanes on I-805 south of I- - 5 13 Highways NOLF National City, Workshop 8. L-192 Chula Vista NBC Table Camp Pendleton, Miramar, December NBPL, 2018 MCRD, Coast Freeways and Workshop Slug Line Optimization Guard, All - 0.30 1 Highways NBPL NBSD, MCRD CG Broadway, Table Naval Medical Center, NBC, L-193 SSTC, NOLF SR 75 Palm May 2019 Ave from I-5 Carpool/BRT Lane on SR Imperial Freeways and Military SR 75 to NOLF and 75 Palm to NOLF or NOLF, SSTC Beach, - 0.40 1 Highways Working Coastal Coastal Campus Coronado Group L-200 Campus Naval Medical Add two freeway lanes SANDAG Freeways and Center, City of San I-15 I-5 to SR 94 and two managed lanes 136 159 400 Regional Highways Broadway, Diego (6F to 8F + 2ML) Plan (2015) L-38 NBSD, NBC SANDAG Add two managed lanes Freeways and Miramar, City of San I-15 I-8 to SR 163 56 65 106 Regional (8F to 8F + 2ML) Highways NBSD, NBC Diego Plan (2015) L-40 Oceanside, SR78 to SANDAG Add four toll lanes (8F to Freeways and NBSD, San Diego I-15 Riverside 1,029 1,202 3,024 Regional 8F + 4T) Highways Miramar, County County Plan (2015) L-41 NBC NBPL, SANDAG I-8 to La Jolla Add 2 managed lanes Freeways and MCRD, Coast City of San I-5 556 649 1,634 Regional Village Drive (8F/10F to 8/10 F + 2ML) Highways Guard, Diego Plan (2015) L-42 NBSD, NBC NBPL, SANDAG Add Operational Lanes to Freeways and MCRD, Coast City of San I-5 I-15 to I-8 1,177 1,375 3,459 Regional 8 Freeway Lanes Highways Guard, Diego Plan (2015) L-43 NBSD, NBC

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Add 2 freeway lanes and 2 City of San SANDAG SR-54 to SR- Freeways and I-5 managed lanes (8F to10F NBSD Diego, 343 401 647 Regional 15 Highways + 2ML) National City Plan (2015) L-44 Miramar, SANDAG I-8 to La Jolla Add two managed lanes Freeways and NBPL, City of San I-5 556 649 1,049 Regional Village Dr. (8F/10F to 8F/10F + 2ML) Highways MCRD, Coast Diego Plan (2015) L-46 Guard Miramar, La Jolla Camp SANDAG Add two managed lanes ( Freeways and City of San I-5 Village Dr. to Pendleton, 206 241 605 Regional 8F/14F to 8F/14F +2ML) Highways Diego I-5/805 Merge NBPL, NBC, Plan (2015) L-47 NBSD Miramar, I-5/I-805 Add two managed lanes Camp SANDAG Freeways and City of San I-5 Merge to (8F/14F + 2ML to 8F/14F Pendleton, 91 106 172 Regional Highways Diego SR56 + 4ML) NBPL, NBC, Plan (2015) L-48 NBSD Miramar, City of San SR-56 to Camp Diego, Del SANDAG Add two managed lanes Freeways and I-5 Manchester Pendleton, Mar, Solana 455 531 858 Regional (8F + 2ML to 8F + 4ML) Highways Ave NBPL, NBC, Beach, San Plan (2015) L-49 NBSD Diego County Miramar, Oceanside, Phase I: Add two Camp Encinitas, SANDAG Manchester Freeways and I-5 managed lanes (8F to 8F Pendleton, Solana 701 819 861 Regional Ave to SR 78 Highways + 2ML) NBPL, NBC, Beach, Del Plan (2015) L-50 NBSD Mar Camp Pendleton, Miramar, Phase II: Add two Encinitas, SANDAG Manchester Freeways and MCRD, Coast I-5 managed lanes (8F + 2ML Carlsbad, 1,076 1,257 2,030 Regional Ave to SR 78 Highways Guard, to 8F + 4ML) Oceanside Plan (2015) NBSD, Naval Medical L-51 Center, NBC Camp Pendleton, Miramar, SR 78 to Phase I: Add two SANDAG Freeways and MCRD, Coast Carlsbad, I-5 Vandegrift managed lanes (8F to 8F 76 89 143 Regional Highways Guard, Oceanside Blvd + 2ML) Plan (2015) NBSD, Naval Medical L-52 Center, NBC Camp Pendleton, Miramar, SR 78 to Phase II: Add two SANDAG Freeways and MCRD, Coast Carlsbad, I-5 Vandegrift managed lanes (8F + 2ML 606 708 1,781 Regional Highways Guard, Oceanside Blvd to 8F + 4ML) Plan (2015) NBSD, Naval Medical L-53 Center, NBC Camp Pendleton, Vandegrift Miramar, SANDAG Blvd to Add four toll lanes (8F to Freeways and MCRD, Coast I-5 Oceanside 1,813 2,118 5,328 Regional Orange 8F + 4T) Highways Guard, Plan (2015) County NBSD, Naval Medical L-54 Center, NBC

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * South to East SANDAG Freeways and Camp I-5/SR-78 and West to Freeway connector Oceanside 273 319 515 Regional Highways Pendleton South Plan (2015) L-55 SANDAG SR-125 to Freeways and I-8 Operational Improvements None El Cajon 167 195 491 Regional 2nd Street Highways Plan (2015) L-56 NBPL, City of San SANDAG Freeways and MCRD, Coast I-8 I-5 to SR-125 Operational Improvements Diego, La 667 779 1,960 Regional Highways Guard, Mesa Plan (2015) L-57 NBSD, NBC El Cajon, SANDAG 2nd Street to Add 2 General Purpose Freeways and I-8 None County of 35 41 103 Regional Los Coches Lanes Highways San Diego Plan (2015) L-58 Imperial SANDAG SR-905 to Add two managed lanes ( Freeways and SSTC, NOLF, I-805 Beach, City of 343 401 647 Regional Palomar St 8F to 8F + 2ML) Highways NBSD San Diego Plan (2015) L-59 National City, SANDAG SR 54 to SR Add two managed lanes Freeways and NBSD, SSTC, City of San I-805 704 822 1,328 Regional 94 (8F + 2ML to 8F + 4ML) Highways NOLF Diego, Chula Plan (2015) L-60 Vista NBSD, SSTC, Phase I: Add two NOLF, SANDAG SR 94 to SR Freeways and City of San I-805 managed lanes (8F to 8F Broadway, 172 201 324 Regional 15 Highways Diego + 2ML) Naval Medical Plan (2015) L-61 Center NBSD, SSTC, Phase II: Add two NOLF, SANDAG SR 94 to SR Freeways and City of San I-805 managed lanes (8F + 2ML Broadway, 61 71 179 Regional 15 Highways Diego to 8F + 4ML) Naval Medical Plan (2015) L-62 Center NBSD, SSTC, NOLF, SANDAG SR 15 to SR Add four managed lanes Freeways and City of San I-805 Broadway, 1,152 1,346 3,385 Regional 163 (8F/10F to 8F/10F + 4ML) Highways Diego Naval Medical Plan (2015) L-63 Center Phase I: Add two SANDAG SR 163 to SR Freeways and City of San I-805 managed lanes (8F to 8F Miramar 229 267 432 Regional 52 Highways Diego + 2ML) Plan (2015) L-64 Phase II: Add two SANDAG SR 163 to SR Freeways and City of San I-805 managed lanes (8F + 2ML Miramar 322 376 946 Regional 52 Highways Diego to 8F + 4ML) Plan (2015) L-65 SR 52 to Phase I: Add two SANDAG Freeways and City of San I-805 Carroll managed lanes (8F to 8F Miramar 255 298 313 Regional Highways Diego Canyon Rd + 2ML) Plan (2015) L-66 SR 52 to Phase II: Add two SANDAG Freeways and City of San I-805 Carroll managed lanes (8F + 2ML Miramar 394 460 743 Regional Highways Diego Canyon Rd to 8F + 4ML) Plan (2015) L-67 City of San SANDAG SR 125 to Add four toll lanes and a Freeways and SR 11 None Diego, San 832 972 1,022 Regional Mexico land port of entry Highways Diego County Plan (2015) L-68

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * San Diego County, SANDAG SR 54 to SR Add two managed lanes Freeways and SR 125 None Lemon 76 89 223 Regional 94 (6F to 6F + 2ML) Highways Grove, La Plan (2015) L-69 Mesa La Mesa, El SANDAG Add two freeway lanes (8F Freeways and SR 125 SR 94 to I-8 None Cajon, Lemon 293 342 861 Regional to 10F + 2ML) Highways Grove Plan (2015) L-70 SANDAG Add two managed lanes ( Freeways and City of San SR 52 I-805 to I-15 Miramar 91 106 267 Regional 6F to 6F + 2ML) Highways Diego Plan (2015) L-71 Add two, reversible City of San SANDAG I-15 to SR Freeways and SR 52 managed lanes (4F/6F to Miramar Diego, San 298 348 876 Regional 125 Highways 4F/6F + 2ML (R)) Diego County Plan (2015) L-72 San Diego SANDAG Add two managed lanes Freeways and NBSD, SSTC, County, SR 54 I-5 to SR 125 111 130 326 Regional (6F to 6F + 2ML) Highways NOLF National City, Plan (2015) L-73 Chula Vista Naval Medical SANDAG Add two managed lanes Freeways and Center, City of San SR 94 I-5 to I-805 535 625 1,009 Regional (8F to 8F + 2ML) Highways Broadway, Diego Plan (2015) L-74 NBSD, NBC Freeway connector EB SR 11 and WB SR 11 to NB SANDAG SR-11/ SR 125 to NB SR 125 and Freeways and San Diego None 74 86 91 Regional SR-905 SB 125 to WB SR 905, SB Highways County Plan (2015) SR 125 to EB SR 11, SB P-1 SR 125 to SB SR 905 Create a direct connection with Harbor Drive and Port CIP Tidelands Avenue, Caltrans Civic Civic Center Signalized Wilson Avenue Freeways and City of Trade Center NBSD - - - Drive and I-5 at Civic Center Drive, add Highways National City Corridors Drive northbound lane on Improvemen Wilson Avenue, widen t Fund P-35 Northbound 1-5 ramp SANDAG I-15 Access to Kinder Freeways and City of San I-15 NBSD - - - Regional Morgan MV Terminal Highways Diego Plan (2015) P-6 Add HOV exit into December Miramar with potential of 2018 Miramar Way adding express lane Freeways and City of San I-15 Miramar - 9 23 Workshop Exit on I-15 access for HOV and Highways Diego Miramar reversible gates during Table P-72 peak direction Camp Project is to incorporate Pendleton, City of San December mitigation measures on Miramar, Diego, San 2018 southbound I-15 to Freeways and MCRD, Coast Diego Workshop I-15 - 3 9 increase throughput (e.g. Highways Guard, County, Camp extended managed lanes) NBSD, Naval Oceanside, Pendleton and address congestion Medical Coronado Table P-73 Center, NBC

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * This was part of a broader December proposal to do a 'corridor 2018 study' for the I-15 to San Diego Freeways and Camp Workshop I-15 Fallbrook Gate and look at County, - 300,000 754,800 Highways Pendleton Camp different solutions that Oceanside Pendleton could include a P&R Table P-74 among other ideas. December 2018 Provide a HOV connection Freeways and City of San I-15 Miramar - - - Workshop to the base from I-15. Highways Diego Miramar P-78 Table National City Marine Terminal Freight Rail Improvements, including National City, SANDAG National but not limited to: Freight Rail NBSD Port of San 3 4 6 Regional City additional rail storage Diego Plan (2015) facilities in the vicinity of P-3 the balloon track Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal Freight Rail Improvements: including National City, SANDAG Tenth but not limited to track Freight Rail NBSD Port of San 28 33 82 Regional Avenue upgrades and increased Diego Plan (2015) staging area for rail cargo P-5 and loading December Ocean Move gates further in to 2018 Gate Gate NBC Coronado - 1 2 Blvd extend queuing space Workshop P-51 NBC Table December Move gates further in to 2018 4th Street Gate Gate NBC Coronado - 1 2 extend queuing space Workshop P-52 NBC Table December Move gates further in to 2018 1st Street Gate Gate NBC Coronado - 2 5 extend queuing space Workshop P-53 NBC Table December Expedite flow through gate 2018 3rd Street Gate Gate NBC Coronado - - - with technology Workshop P-54 NBC Table December Silver Signal at new gate on Imperial 2018 Stand Gate Silver Strand Training Gate SSTC - 1 2 Beach Workshop Blvd Complex P-64 NBC Table December City of 6,000 more housing units 2018 City of San San Mira Mesa In Mira Mesa. Evaluate iCommute Miramar - - - Workshop Diego Diego connection to Miramar Miramar P-70 Table December iCommute, 2018 NBC MTS service onto base NBC None - - - Transit Workshop P-59 NBC Table SANDAG Mid Logistics Center Mid Intermodal None None 2,130 2,488 6,259 Regional County County Transit Center Plan (2015) P-7

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * SANDAG North Logistics Center North Intermodal None None 166 194 488 Regional County County Transit Center Plan (2015) P-8 December 2018 Build more housing using City of San Workshop Land Use NBPL, MCRD - - - public-private partnership Diego NBPL MCRD CG P-41 Table Lot of unexploded December ordinance which hasn't 2018 City of San Miramar been cleared yet and that Land Use Miramar - - - Workshop Diego has made expansion of Miramar P-48 Miramar slow. Table December 2018 Rezone to allow for City of San Land Use Miramar - - - Workshop affordable housing Diego Miramar P-71 Table December 2018 City of San Increase on-base housing Land Use Miramar - - - Workshop Diego Miramar P-81 Table City of San Diego, Chula Vista, SSTC, NOLF, National City, Santa Fe to Blue Line Express – Santa NBSD, SANDAG Route City of San L-114 San Ysidro Fe Depot to San Ysidro Light Rail Broadway, 391 457 1,149 Regional 540 Diego, Chula via downtown via downtown MCRD, Coast Plan (2015) Vista, Guard, NBPL National City, Port of San Diego Project includes bulb-outs City of at Fourth Street at A Coronado A Ave, C Ave Fourth Avenue, C Avenue and Local Capital L-141 and Pomona NBC Coronado 0.23 0.25 0.20 Street Pomona Street (south side Streets/Roads Improvemen Street only). In design, set for t Program construction FY 2017. (CIP) (2016)

National City Highland Widen Plaza Boulevard to Capital Plaza Avenue to Local L-145 construct a 6-lane regional NBSD National City 7 8 9 Improvemen Boulevard Euclid Streets/Roads arterial roadway. t Program Avenue (CIP) (2017)

Oceanside Westport Capital Douglas Local Camp L-151 Drive to Median Improvements Oceanside - 0.10 0.10 Improvemen Drive Streets/Roads Pendleton Festival Drive t Program (CIP) (2017) Port CIP Grade Separated City of San Caltrans Crosby Drive Improvements: a two-way Diego, City of 10th Local Trade L-153 to Harbor flyover ramp over the None San Diego, - - - Avenue Streets/Roads Corridors Drive railroad tracks to the Port of San Improvemen median of Harbor Drive Diego t Fund

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Caltrans Otay Mesa Southbound California Otay Local L-154 Truck Route None None 35 41 103 Freight Mesa Streets/Roads Improvements Mobility Plan (2014) Mission Road identified as a readiness corridor. December Mission Readiness corridor is an 2018 Avenue from agreement between Mission Local Camp Workshop L-159 Coast Hwy Oceanside and Camp Oceanside - 0.15 0.38 Ave Streets/Roads Pendleton Camp 101 to Pendleton to focus on Pendleton Canyon Dr improving congestion on Table this street to increase throughput. December City of San 2018 Synchronize signals and Diego, City of Rosecran I-5 to NBPL Local Workshop L-168 add TSP from I-5 to NBPL NBPL, MCRD San Diego, - 1 1 s St Gate Streets/Roads NBPL Gate Port of San MCRD CG Diego Table City of San Bridge connecting Point Diego, Loma peninsula to Coronado, December Coronado Island. Prefer Local City of San 2018 wherever the shortest NBC, NBPL - - - Streets/Roads Diego, Workshop distance would be (lower Coronado, NBC Table capital cost if smaller Port of San bridge) L-178 Diego City of San Bridge connecting Diego, downtown San Diego to Coronado, December Coronado Island. Prefer NBC, Local City of San 2018 wherever the shortest Broadway, - - - Streets/Roads Diego, Workshop distance would be (lower NBSD Coronado, NBC Table capital cost if smaller Port of San bridge) L-180 Diego December I-5 to SSTC Traffic signal Local Imperial 2018 SR 75 gate via Palm synchronization to SSTC, NOLF - 0.40 1 Streets/Roads Beach Workshop Ave expedite SSTC from I-5 L-183 NBC Table December Glorietta Blvd 3rd St, HOV Lane on 3rd St and Local 2018 to NBC Gates NBC Coronado - 0.20 1 4th Ave 4th Ave Streets/Roads Workshop on 3rd & 4th L-185 NBC Table December Glorietta Blvd Signal synchronization Local 2018 3rd St to NBC Gate NBC Coronado - 0.10 0.25 along 3rd Street Streets/Roads Workshop on 3rd St L-186 NBC Table Allowing vehicles to turn left early, which alleviates queuing to Orange Avenue. Those trying to December End of bridge get to NAB don't need to Local 2018 4th St on island to B travel up to Orange NBC Coronado - 0.10 0.25 Streets/Roads Workshop Ave because they are NBC Table southbound. This should be a point at the end of the bridge onto the first L-194 arterial.

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Miramar Way is the December primary access from I-15 2018 Miramar From I-15 to Local City of San and needs to be evaluated Miramar - 0.30 1 Workshop Road West Gate Streets/Roads Diego as congestion continues to Miramar L-196 increase. Table Caltrans Otay California Otay Mesa Port of Entry Local City of San Mesa Port None 63 74 185 Freight Modernization Project Streets/Roads Diego of Entry Mobility Plan P-14 (2014) Caltrans Jacumba California Jacumba Port of Entry Local City of San Port of None 39 46 116 Freight Improvements Streets/Roads Diego Entry Mobility Plan P-15 (2014) City of Coronado east of Speed table east of Fourth Local Capital Orange Orange Avenue on Fourth NBC Coronado - - - Street Streets/Roads Improvemen Avenue Street t Program (CIP) (2016) P-18 City of Coronado Traffic signal at Fourth at Alameda Local Capital intersection (exit to NAS NBC Coronado - - 0.30 Street Boulevard Streets/Roads Improvemen North Island) t Program (CIP) (2016) P-19 National City Marine Terminal (NCMT) Marine Cargo Staging and Handling Projects, including but not limited to: National City, SANDAG National construct garages for Local NBSD Port of San 95 111 179 Regional City additional roll-on/roll-off Streets/Roads Diego Plan (2015) cargo storage, wharf extension to create two new berths, and improvements to facilitate P-2 "marine highway" cargo City of San Install signal poles with Diego longer mast arms; remove Capital City of San 32nd Norman Scott signal poles off medians; Local Improvemen NBSD Diego, Port of - - - Street Rd upgrade vehicle heads to Streets/Roads t Program San Diego 12" LED; install Polara (CIP GIS APS Shapefile) P-22 (2017) City of San Diego Capital Traffic signal Local City of San Improvemen Main St Vesta St NBSD - - - improvements Streets/Roads Diego t Program (CIP GIS Shapefile) P-23 (2017) Upgrades such as new National City traffic signals, push Capital buttons, curb ramps, and Local Citywide None National City 4 5 5 Improvemen modifications to signal Streets/Roads t Program poles, pedestrian (CIP) (2017) "countdown" signal heads P-26 Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * *

National City at I-5 SB off- Signalize intersection and Local Downtown 8th Street NBSD National City - 1 2 ramp eliminate free right-turn Streets/Roads Specific Plan (2017) P-28

National City Hoover Local Downtown 8th Street Signalize intersection NBSD National City - 1 2 Avenue Streets/Roads Specific Plan (2017) P-29 Douglas Bridge Seismic Retrofit: federally funded project to retrofit the bridge that carries Oceanside Douglas Drive over San Capital Douglas Old River to Luis Rey River. Caltrans Local Camp Oceanside - 0.42 0.42 Improvemen Drive Pala will be partner agency, Streets/Roads Pendleton t Program with financing through the (CIP) (2017) Highway Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement Program P-31 (HBRRP) Port CIP Grade Separated Caltrans Improvements: a partially City of San 32nd Harbor Drive Local Trade raised tee intersection for NBSD Diego, Port of - - - Street to I-5 Streets/Roads Corridors turning movement from San Diego Improvemen Harbor Drive to I-5 P-33 t Fund Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal (TAMT) Marine Cargo Staging and Handling Projects, including but not limited to National City, SANDAG Tenth : enhanced open storage, Local NBSD Port of San 88 103 259 Regional Avenue k shed demolition, carbo Streets/Roads Diego Plan (2015) handling infrastructure improvements, wharf reinforcements, additional crane, on-dock P-4 shorepower Bridge connecting Melrose December Dr and N River Rd over 2018 From Melrose existing river. Oceanside Melrose Local Camp Workshop Dr to N River Planner noted that there Oceanside - 10 25 Dr Streets/Roads Pendleton Camp Rd would be no transit Pendleton planned until a third bridge Table P-40 was built on Melrose December Intersection 2018 Pedestrian crossing Pacific of Barnett Local City of San Workshop upgrades (sidewalks, MCRD, NBPL - 0.20 1 Highway Ave and Streets/Roads Diego NBPL bulbouts, etc.) Pacific Hwy MCRD CG P-42 Table December Intersection 2018 Pedestrian crossing Rosecran of Rosecrans Local City of San Workshop upgrades (sidewalks, MCRD, NBPL - 0.04 0.10 s St St and Sports Streets/Roads Diego NBPL bulbouts, etc.) Arena Blvd MCRD CG P-43 Table

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * December "corridor study" for East 2018 East Mission Road to address Local Camp Workshop Mission this concern and identify Oceanside - 300,000 754,800 Streets/Roads Pendleton Camp Road recommended solutions Pendleton for mitigation. P-75 Table December 2018 East One lane in each direction Local Camp Workshop Mission Oceanside - 12 31 and needs to be widened. Streets/Roads Pendleton Camp Road Pendleton P-76 Table Harbor Drive Multimodal Corridor Improvements, including but not limited to: improvements at 32nd City of San Local Street and Vesta Street; Diego, SANDAG Harbor Streets/Roads, L-111 pedestrian crossings and NBSD National City, 273 319 802 Regional Drive Active bridges; various truck Port of San Plan (2015) Transportation improvements; bikeway Diego accommodations; street scape, safety, and parking improvements Caltrans District Local City of San System Vesta Over Harbor Install access Streets/Roads, L-133 NBSD Diego, Port of 85 99 250 Managemen Street Drive enhancement bridge Active San Diego t Plan Transportation (DSMP) (2015) City of San Widen Miramar Road to 8 Diego I-805 Easterly lanes from I-805 easterly Local Capital Miramar Off Ramps to on and off-ramps to 300 Streets/Roads, City of San Improvemen L-143 Miramar - 6 15 Road 300' east of feet east of Eastgate Mall. Freeways and Diego t Program Eastgate Mall Includes dual left-turn Highways (CIP GIS lanes at Eastgate Mall. Shapefile) (2017) At the Del Mar Gate, commuter traffic into December Pendleton spilling over 2018 Capistrano into Capistrano Local Capistran Camp Workshop L-157 Neighborhoo Neighborhood. Consider Streets/Roads, Oceanside - - - o Dr Pendleton Camp d improvements to gate Gate Pendleton security to maximize Table throughput and alleviate spillover traffic. From Trolley Consider microtransit to December Imperial Station to support first/last mile Imperial 2018 Beach Micromobility NOLF - 3 8 Imperial access to trolley. Beach Workshop Blvd P-62 Beach Specifically for IB area. NBC Table December 2018 Miramar Shared parking "Mobility Miramar Micromobility Miramar None - 3 8 Workshop parking areas Hubs" on base Miramar P-80 Table Miramar College and Connect Miramar to May 2019 Black Sorrento Miramar College and City of San Military Mountain Valley Micromobility Miramar - 3 8 Sorrento Valley Diego Working Road COASTER COASTER station Group station to P-82 Miramar Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * December 2018 NEV on base to provide Miramar Miramar Micromobility Miramar None - 3 8 Workshop internal circulation Miramar P-83 Table

8th Street National City Micromobility, and Connections Downtown Electric shuttle system Streetcar/Shuttl NBSD National City - 3 8 Yama to NBSD Specific Plan e Street (2017) P-36 Park and Ride on the east December City of San East Side side of the bay with a 2018 Park & Ride NBC, NBSD Diego, - 5 12 of Bay direct service connection Workshop Coronado P-55 to the NBC bases NBC Table City of San Point Loma to Connection from Point NBPL, Diego, City of SANDAG Kearny Mesa L-100 Route 28 Loma to Kearny Mesa via Rapid MCRD, San Diego, 49 57 144 Regional via Old Town, Old Town, Linda Vista Miramar Port of San Plan (2015) Linda Vista Diego Connection from Spring Valley to SDSU via City of San SANDAG Spring Valley Broadway, L-104 Route 11 Southeast San Diego, Rapid Diego, San 113 132 213 Regional to SDSU NBSD Downtown, Hilcrest, Mid- Diego County Plan (2015) City Kearny Mesa Connection from Kearny SANDAG Route Broadway, City of San L-105 to Downtown Mesa to Downtown San Rapid 78 91 147 Regional 120 NBSD Diego San Diego Diego via Mission Valley Plan (2015) Connection from North Broadway, SANDAG North Park to Park to Downtown San City of San L-106 Route 2 Rapid Naval Medical 39 46 74 Regional Downtown Diego via 30th St, Golden Diego Center Plan (2015) Hill South Bay Rapid (Otay Mesa to Downtown) and Otay Mesa ITC (formerly Otay Mesa to City of San Route 628)connection to Downtown Diego, San employment and activity SANDAG Route and Otay Diego L-107 centers in Downtown San Rapid Broadway 206 241 253 Regional 225 Mesa ITC County, Diego and provide Plan (2015) (formerly Chula Vista, travelers with frequent, Route 628) National City reliable transit encouraging commuting by transit City of San Route 640A: I-5 - San Diego, Chula Ysidro to Old Town Transit Vista, Center via City College; Naval Medical National City, Routes SANDAG San Ysidro to 640B: I-5 Iris Center, City of San L-124 640A/640 Rapid 153 179 289 Regional Palomar Trolley/Palomar to Kearny Broadway, Diego, Chula B Plan (2015) Mesa via Chula Vista, NBSD Vista, National City and City National City, College Port of San Diego Oceanside, Escondido, Carlsbad to Connection from Carlsbad Vista, San SANDAG Route Escondido to Escondido Transit Camp Rapid Marco, 51 60 150 Regional 440 Transit Center via Palomar Airport Pendleton Carlsbad, Plan (2015) Center Rd San Diego L-80 County

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Connection from SANDAG Route Oceanside to Oceanside to Vista via Camp Rapid Oceanside 50 58 147 Regional 474 Vista Mission Ave/Santa Fe Rd Pendleton Plan (2015) L-81 Corridor Camp Connection from Camp SANDAG Route Pendleton to Pendleton to Carlsbad Camp Oceanside, Rapid 80 93 235 Regional 477 Carlsbad Village via College Blvd, Pendleton Carlsbad Plan (2015) L-82 Village Plaza Camino Real Eastlake to Connection from Eastlake SANDAG Route Palomar to Palomar Trolley via Rapid None Chula Vista 56 65 106 Regional 635 Trolley Main St Corridor Plan (2015) L-90 City of San North Park to Connection from North Diego, City of SANDAG Route 32nd St Park to 32nd St Trolley Rapid NBSD San Diego, 33 39 97 Regional 637 Trolley Station via Golden Hill Port of San Plan (2015) Station L-91 Diego City of San Chula Vista to Diego, Connection from Chula Palomar Carlsbad, Del SANDAG Route Vista to Palomar Airport Airport Rd Rapid Miramar Mar, Solana 82 96 241 Regional 650 Rd Business Park via I- Business Beach, Plan (2015) 805/I-5 (peak only) Park Encinitas, L-92 Chula Vista City of San Diego, Mid-City to Connection from Mid-City SANDAG Route Carlsbad, Del Palomar to Palomar Airport Rd via Rapid Miramar 10 12 29 Regional 653 Mar, Solana Airport Rd Kearny Mesa/I-805/I-5 Plan (2015) Beach, L-93 Encinitas Connection from H St Chula Vista, H St Trolley SANDAG Route Trolley Station to Millennia NBSD, NOLF, Chula Vista, Station to Rapid 37 43 70 Regional 709 via H St Corridor, SSTC Port of San Millennia Plan (2015) L-94 Southwestern College Diego City of San Diego, Coronado, Coronado to Connection from SANDAG Route Broadway, City of San Downtown Coronado to Downtown Rapid 26 30 49 Regional 910 NBSD, NBC Diego, San Diego San Diego Plan (2015) Coronado, Port of San L-97 Diego Route 688: San Ysidro to Sorrento Mesa via I-805/I- 15SR 52 Corridors (peak only); Route 689: Otay City of San Routes San Ysidro to Mesa Port of Entry to SANDAG Diego, Chula 688/689/6 Sorrento UTC/Torrey Pines via Rapid Miramar 458 535 864 Regional Vista, 90 Mesa Otay Ranch/Millennia, I- Plan (2015) National City 805 Corridor (peak only); Route 690: Mid-City to Sorrento Mesa via I-805 L-98 Corridor (peak o Escondido to City of San Temecula (peak only) Broadway, Downtown Diego, SANDAG Route Extension of Escondido to Miramar, Rapid Rapid Oceanside, 98 114 288 Regional 235 Downtown Rapid (formerly NBSD, NBC, (formerly Vista, Plan (2015) Route 610) MCRD L-99 Route 610) Escondido Oceanside, Vista, SANDAG Route Camp L-101 Sprinter Express SPRINTER Escondido, 244 285 717 Regional 588 Pendleton San Diego Plan (2015) County Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * SPRINTER efficiency improvements (20-minute frequencies by 2025); double tracking Oceanside Oceanside, to Escondido for 10- Escondido, SANDAG Route Oceanside to Camp minute frequencies and SPRINTER Vista, San 946 1,105 1,784 Regional 399 Escondido Pendleton six rail grade separations Marco, San Plan (2015) at EL Camino Real, Diego County Melrose Dr, Vista Village Dr/Main St, North Dr, Civic L-78 Center, Auto Pkwy a Oceanside, Branch Escondido, SANDAG Route Extension to Branch Extension to Camp SPRINTER Vista, San 176 206 517 Regional 399 Westfield Westfield North County Pendleton Marco, San Plan (2015) North County L-79 Diego County Hillcrest, Loop between Hilcrest, SANDAG Route Balboa Park, Streetcar/Shuttl Naval Medical City of San Balboa Park, and 29 34 55 Regional 554 Downtown e Center Diego, Downtown San Diego Plan (2015) L-87 San Diego 30th St to Connection from 30th St Naval Medical SANDAG Route Streetcar/Shuttl City of San Downtown to Downtown San Diego Center, 26 30 49 Regional 555 e Diego San Diego via North Park/Golden Hill Broadway Plan (2015) L-88 City of San Diego, Coronado, Connection from Otay Iris Imperial Trolley Station to North SANDAG Route Otay to North NBC, SSTC, Beach, City of L-116 Island via Imperial Beach Transit 54 63 159 Regional 639 Island NOLF San Diego, and Silver Strand, Plan (2015) Coronado, Coronado Imperial Beach, Port of San Diego Bayside NBPL to December Water Taxi / Ferry City of San Harbor Drive 2018 San connecting Bayside NBPL NBPL, Diego, City of Annex, Workshop L-165 Diego with Harbor Drive Annex, Transit Broadway, San Diego, - 71 179 Downtown NBPL Bay Downtown San Diego, NBSD, NBC Port of San SD, MCRD CG Coronado, and NBSD Diego Coronado, Map and NBSD December 2018 Kellog Street Rosecran City of San Workshop L-169 to Kerrick Bus Connection (Transit) Transit NBPL - 1 4 s St Diego NBPL Road MCRD CG Table December 2018 Rosecrans St City of San Workshop L-170 Kellog St to Catalina Bus/shuttle service Transit NBPL - 6 14 Diego NBPL Blvd MCRD CG Table December 2018 Rosecrans St Bus/shuttle service on City of San Workshop L-171 to Catalina Transit NBPL - - - existing streets Diego NBPL Blvd MCRD CG Table

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * December Trolley Monorail, LRT, or BRT City of San 2018 Station at W connection from Trolley Diego, City of Workshop Palm Street Station to Airport terminal; Transit All San Diego, - - - NBPL to Airport high-capacity transit Port of San MCRD CG Terminal connection Diego L-173 Table City of San Ferry service or Bridge December Diego, City of directly to NASNI from NBC, 2018 Transit San Diego, - 36 91 downtown to increase Broadway Workshop Port of San access to transit NBC Table L-179 Diego City of San Diego, December From Santa National City, 2018 Rail Fe Depot to Extend Coaster City of San Workshop Transit NBSD - 14 36 Alignment 32nd Street connection to NBSD Diego, NBPL Station National City, MCRD CG Port of San Table L-197 Diego El Cajon to City of San Connection from El Cajon SANDAG Route UTC via Diego, El to UTC via Santee, SR 52, Transit Miramar 7 8 21 Regional 870 Santee, SR Cajon, I-805 Plan (2015) L-95 52, I-805 Santee City of San El Cajon to Connection from El Cajon SANDAG Route Diego, El Sorrento to Sorrento Mesa via SR Transit Miramar 12 14 35 Regional 890 Cajon, Mesa 52, Kearny Mesa Plan (2015) L-96 Santee Phase II: Vehicles, transit system rehabilitation, maintenance facilities, ITS, regulatory compliance, Park and SANDAG Region- Ride, transit center Transit All All 2,519 2,942 4,752 Regional wide expansions to enhance Plan (2015) the experience for commuting by improving efficiency and reliability of P-10 services Phase III: Vehicles, transit system rehabilitation, maintenance facilities, ITS, regulatory compliance, Park and SANDAG Region- Ride, transit center Transit All All 3,266 3,815 9,598 Regional wide expansions to enhance Plan (2015) the experience for commuting by improving efficiency and reliability of P-11 services December Express bus from east City of San 2018 NBC county residential to Transit NBC - 8 21 Diego Workshop NASNI P-57 NBC Table December City of Chula Express bus from Chula 2018 NBC Transit NBC Vista, Port of - 8 21 Vista to North Island Workshop San Diego P-58 NBC Table December Silver Service improvements to Coronado, 901 service 2018 Stand bypass congestion for 901 Transit NBC Imperial - 1 2 route Workshop Blvd route. Beach P-61 NBC Table

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * Coronado, December Service Circulating shuttle Imperial South NBC, NBSD, 2018 between connecting all Navy base Transit Beach, City of - 3 8 Bay NBPL Workshop naval facilities facilities San Diego, NBC Table P-63 National City From Blue Line Trolley December Station west Silver Imperial 2018 of I-5 to Trolley Station to IB Transit NBC - 20 50 Strand Beach Workshop bases in NBC Table Imperial P-66 Beach From Trolley December Imperial Station to Imperial 2018 Beach Trolley Station to IB Transit SSTC, NOLF - - - Imperial Beach Workshop Blvd P-67 Beach NBC Table Phase I: Vehicles, transit system rehabilitation, maintenance facilities, ITS, regulatory compliance, Park and SANDAG Region- Ride, transit center Transit All All 632 738 777 Regional wide expansions to enhance Plan (2015) the experience for commuting by improving efficiency and reliability of P-9 services Construction of a mixed- use project with Oceanside Pier View commercial, and up to 356 Capital Cleveland Way and Transit, Land Camp public parking spaces on Oceanside - 13 32 Improvemen Street Civic Center Use Pendleton Lot 23. The public parking t Program Drive structure could serve the (CIP) (2017) P-30 Oceanside Transit Center Blue line extension to University City providing NBPL, City of San University public transportation in MCRD, Coast Diego, City of SANDAG Route City to coastal San Diego County. L-102 Trolley Guard, San Diego, 1,753 2,048 2,154 Regional 510 Downtown Increased frequencies and Broadway, Port of San Plan (2015) San Diego front door access to Naval NBSD Diego Base San Diego at 32nd St City of San Diego, Chula Vista, SSTC, NOLF, National City, UTC to Trolley 561; UTC NBSD, SANDAG Route City of San L-103 COASTER COASTER Connection Trolley Broadway, 343 401 647 Regional 561 Diego, Chula Connection (extension of Route 510) MCRD, Coast Plan (2015) Vista, Guard, NBPL National City, Port of San Diego Phase II - Blue Line rail NBPL, SANDAG Route Taylor St & City of San L-112 grade separations at Trolley MCRD, Coast 226 264 664 Regional 510 Ash St Diego Tayler St and Ash St Guard Plan (2015)

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Draft Draft Draft Relevant Relevant Cost Cost Cost Project PID Facility Description Project Type Military Jurisdiction ($2014); ($2019); ($YOE); Source Extents Stakeholders Stakeholders millions millions* millions* ** * * City of San Diego, Chula Vista, SSTC, NOLF, National City, NBSD, SANDAG Route Blue Line Rail Grade City of San L-113 Trolley Broadway, 431 503 1,267 Regional 510 Separation Diego, Chula MCRD, Coast Plan (2015) Vista, Guard, NBPL National City, Port of San Diego Kearny Mesa Phase II - Connection SANDAG Route City of San L-115 to Carmel from Kearny Mesa to Trolley Miramar 633 739 1,860 Regional 562 Diego Valley Carmel Valley Plan (2015) City of San Phase I - Blue Line Diego, Frequency Enhancements National City, NBPL, and rail grade separations Chula Vista, Palomar St to MCRD, Coast SANDAG Route at 28th St, 32nd St, E St, City of San 12th & Trolley Guard, 205 239 387 Regional 510 H St Palomar St, and Diego, Imperial Broadway, Plan (2015) Blue/Orange Track National City, NBSD Connection at Chula Vista, 12th/Imperial Port of San L-83 Diego Orange Line Frequency City of San Enhancements and four Diego, San East San rail grade separations at Naval Medical Diego SANDAG Route Diego County Euclid Ave, Center, Trolley County, El 267 312 504 Regional 520 to Downtown Broadway/Lemmon Grove Broadway, Cajon, La Plan (2015) San Diego Ave, Allision NBSD Mesa, Lemon Ave/University Ave, Grove L-84 Severin Dr City of San Diego, San East San Naval Medical Diego SANDAG Route Diego County Orange Line Frequency Center, Trolley County, El - - - Regional 520 to Downtown Enhancements Broadway, Cajon, La Plan (2015) San Diego NBSD Mesa, Lemon L-85 Grove City of San Diego, San Diego County, El Naval Medical Cajon, La SANDAG Route Green Line Frequency Center, Mesa, City of Green Line Trolley - - - Regional 530 Enhancements Broadway, San Diego, Plan (2015) NBSD San Diego County, El Cajon, La Mesa, Port of L-86 San Diego Phase I - Connection from San Ysidro to Kearny City of San Mesa via Chula Vista via SANDAG Route San Ysidro to NBSD, NOLF, Diego, Chula Highland Ave/4th Ave, Trolley 2,333 2,725 4,401 Regional 562 Kearny Mesa SSTC Vista, National City Southeast Plan (2015) National City San Diego, Mid-City, and L-89 Mission Valley

Notes: **Methodology for estimated costs \ is currently under review and subject to change.

APPENDIX B FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Appendix C

Developing the Project Inventory

APPENDIX C FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Developing the Project Inventory The Strategy’s Project Inventory presents a region-wide inventory of multimodal transportation improvements (infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects) that could help address multimodal access needs to military installations and alleviate congestion on local roadways surrounding military installations. Many of the projects in the list have been identified in SANDAG’s San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan), Caltrans California Freight Mobility Plan, Caltrans District System Management Plan (DSMP), and local Capital Improvement Programs (CIPs). The Project also includes new projects and programs developed by the stakeholders of the MWG.

The Project Inventory provides the MWG a consolidated list of projects that improve military mobility in the region. As future funding opportunities arise, the MWG will be able to consult this consolidated list and use the associated Sorting Tool for efficient selection of applicable projects.

The Process In order to develop a comprehensive and usable list of projects relevant to potential funding opportunities, a full community outreach process was implemented. The Strategy’s community outreach helped with identifying existing planned and new projects and programs for the Project Inventory (see Appendix B). The development of the Project Inventory involved the following outreach activities: stakeholder “interviews”, a thorough review of transportation improvement projects found published CIPS, general plans, and various agency project lists, a stakeholder workshop, and frequent updates and feedback from the MWG and PDT. Published Document Scan To help develop the Project Inventory, published documents containing transportation infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects were reviewed to help identify projects that may impact military mobility in the regional transportation network. Many of the documents were referenced by MWG members and stakeholders during the stakeholder interviews and early PDT meetings. The following documents were analyzed to identify projects for inclusion in the Project Inventory: Stakeholder Interviews Stakeholder interviews were held with MWG members and agencies who contribute to the mobility of military personnel region- wide. The interviews were performed to help identify appropriate documents, transportation needs, and people that should be referenced while developing the Project Inventory. To help initiate the interviews, stakeholders were asked:

• The following documents are being reviewed as part of this data gathering to identify current planned projects and policies: (Insert responses). Are there any other documents we should be looking at? • Are there any old projects, strategies, or ideas that have been tested, identified, or thought of in the past but did not work as intended or did not materialize as anticipated? • Are there any new projects, strategies, or ideas that you have to address transportation issues? • Are there regional transportation-related programs you have identified that you specifically support or do not support? • Are there specific areas, either physical infrastructure programs or behavioral patterns, that you would like to note as part of this data gathering?

Through this outreach effort, transportation projects, programs, and published documents were identified by stakeholders and included in the Project Inventory. The following summarizes those documents:

APPENDIX C FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Caltrans City of Oceanside • DSMP District 11 Profile (2016) • City of Oceanside Five Year Capital • DSMP District 11 Strategic Initiatives (2016) Improvement Program Budget FY 17-18 • DSMP District 11 Project List (2015) • Regional Mobility Hub Implementation Strategy • Transportation Concept Report SR-54 (2014) • Oceanside General Plan Circulation Element • Transportation Concept Report SR-75 (2016) • Oceanside Bicycle Master Plan • Transportation Concept Report SR-282 (2016) • Oceanside Pedestrian Master Plan • Transportation Concept Report SR-76 (2016) Port of San Diego • Transportation Concept Report SR-125 (2016) • San Diego Port Master Plan Update Assessment • Transportation Concept Report I-5 (2017) Report • Transportation Concept Report I-15 (2012) • Port of San Diego Port Master Plan • California Freight Mobility Plan (2014) • Capital Improvement Program FY 2014-2018 • State Highway Operation / Protection Program (2018) City of San Diego • TCIF Port Access Improvement Projects: 32nd • City of San Diego General Plan Housing Element Street 2013-2020 • North Coast Corridor Program • City of San Diego General Plan Mobility Element • Central I-5 Corridor Study • City of San Diego Climate Action Plan • City of Coronado GIS Dataset for Capital Improvements Program • City of Coronado Circulation Element County of San Diego • City of Coronado Bicycle Plan • County of San Diego Department of Public • City of Coronado FY 2016/17 to FY 2018/19 Works Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2017/18 to 2021/22 • County of San Diego Mobility Element General City of Imperial Beach Plan • City of Imperial Beach General Plan & Local Coastal Plan • FY 15/16 and 16/17 CIP Implementation Plan Project List • FY 2018 and 2019 CIP 2-year Implementation Plan Military • Navy Hospital Transportation Demand Management Plan • The Future of Mobility: Lyft at Camp Pendleton presentation by Major Brandon Newell • Final Navy TDM Study (2010) • Naval Base San Diego Survey Data (2016) • Naval Base Coronado Survey Data (2015) • US Coast Guard Survey Data (2017) City of National City • National City General Plan • FY 2018 Capital Improvement Projects • National City Downtown Specific Plan • National City SMART Foundation

APPENDIX C FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Stakeholder Workshop and Continuous Check-Ins Members of the MWG and stakeholders from various community groups, military installations, local jurisdictions, and agencies were invited to attend and participate in a stakeholder workshop in December 2018. The workshop was an opportunity for stakeholders to work collaboratively to identify military access needs. It was also an opportunity for stakeholders to add additional projects from published documents or new projects and strategies brainstormed during the workshop activities. Throughout the development of the Project Inventory, the MWG and PDT were given opportunities to review and provide feedback. Appendix H details the project’s outreach strategy.

APPENDIX C FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Appendix D

Project Prioritization Methodology

APPENDIX D FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Project Prioritization Methodology The recommended prioritization methodology is a three-step approach that was presented and discussed at the MMAS March PDT meeting held in March 2019 at the SANDAG offices. The objective of the discussion was to have a refine methodology that the PDT agrees to and can be presented to the Military Working Group (MWG). The methodology was updated based on PDT feedback and presented to the Working Group in March 2019. The MWG provided feedback and direction, which was incorporated into the methodology. The methodology was finalized in May 2019.

STEP 1: Identify projects that align with MWG Mission, Vision, and Values (MVV) The objective of this step is to simplify the project list for further evaluation. This step is not removing projects from the list but rather identifying projects that are most likely to be a priority for the MWG. Proposed Definition of MWG’s Mission, Vision, and Values (MVV) It was proposed by a stakeholder of the project team to screen projects based on the project’s and MWG’s Mission, Vision, and Values. Utilizing the MWG charter, MMAS Scope, and Caltrans grant application, the following definition for MVV was developed:

The MMAS seeks to facilitate dialogue and find common ground between the military installations in San Diego County and adjacent local communities related to the region’s transportation system.

Military bases need the transportation system to support mission readiness through the safe movement of personnel while also enhancing the quality of life of service members. Nearby local jurisdictions need to operate and maintain transportation facilities in a state of good repair that equitably serve the needs of all community members including residents, employees, and businesses. The MMAS contributes towards a transportation system that improves safety for all users while reducing travel times, vehicle miles travelled (VMT) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as outlined in Caltrans Sustainable Community Grant requirements.

In order to identify projects that are likely to be the most impactful to MWG stakeholders, certain project attributes are necessary. The following list identifies the characteristics of projects and programs that align with the MMAS MVV and should move forward for a detailed project evaluation, which is outlined in Step 2.

• Proposed Screens: o Screen 1: Directly benefits at least two stakeholders, including one installation and one local jurisdiction . Purpose of screen: to eliminate single-stakeholder improvements . If a project passes this screen, it will move onto the next screen. o Screen 2: Improves multimodal travel . Purpose of screen: to eliminate non-multimodal projects . If a project passes this screen, it will move onto the next screen. o Screen 3: Project is adequately defined to proceed to detailed evaluation . Purpose of screen: to identify projects with defined project scope & project extents that allow for detailed evaluation . If a project passes this screen, it will move onto the next step. • Validation of Screening by MWG o Feedback from MWG stakeholders (Are there any projects that were screened out that you wish to advance to detailed evaluation step?)

STEP 2: Detailed evaluation for screened projects list The objective of this step is to perform a detailed evaluation of projects elevated from the screening in Step 1 in order to create a differentiation among projects and help identify projects of priority for the MWG. The detailed evaluation process analyzes each project using agreed upon criteria by MWG stakeholders. Using GIS analysis and technical expertise, each criteria provides a score for each screened project.

APPENDIX D FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

• Congestion Relief (Max of 4 Points) o A score of 0-2 applied to project based on heat map of congestion experienced. GIS analysis of commute periods using Google maps or other readily available source. . 2 pts – High congestion area or an area with large anticipated near-term growth . 1 pt – Moderate congestion area or an area with a moderate anticipated near-term growth . 0 pts – Low congestion area or an area with a minimal anticipated near-term growth o A score of 0-2 applied to project based on the impact towards relieving congestion. A PDT traffic engineer to recommend score. . 2 pts – High relief potential . 1 pt – Medium relief potential . 0 pts – Low relief potential . Note: Leaning on technical expert to make judgement. • Increases Safety (Max of 4 points) o A score of 0-2 applied to project based on heat map of collisions. GIS analysis of existing collision data from Transportation Injury Mapping (TIMS) to be used. . 2 pts – Located in an area whose number of collisions is significantly higher than the state’s average . 1 pt – Located in area whose number of collisions is around the state’s average . 0 pts – Located in an area whose number of collisions is below the state’s average o A score of 0 or 2 applied to project based on whether a project is an FHWA approved safety countermeasure. A PDT traffic engineer to recommend score. . 2 pts – Incorporates approved safety countermeasures . 0 pts – Does not incorporate approved safety countermeasures • Increases Transportation Options (Max of 4 points) o A score of 0-1 applied to project based on the impact towards increasing viable and convenient transportation options. A PDT transportation planner to determine score. . 1 pt for each qualifier met: • Connects to high capacity transit or provides congestion relief on transit road • Improvement on a high throughput facility (freeway) • Facility or program is located within a smart growth opportunity area • Improvement adds a new option not previously available or improves existing transportation option

STEP 3: MWG Validation of ranked project list The objective of this step is to allow the MWG stakeholders to validate the projects that rise to the top of the list from the detailed evaluation. This step provides the MWG the opportunity to confirm projects and if necessary, replace projects on the list. This step will result in a vetted list for the MWG to move forward with.

o Detailed evaluation process will result in a ranked list of projects. o A draft top 5 project list for each base distributed to each MWG representative for validation of scoring & ranking . MWG representatives will have the opportunity to either confirm or replace projects in the list . Advisory Consideration: When preparing the final list of projects, MWG representatives should consider whether a project is in an approved plan. o Based on earlier technical scoring and alignment with MVV, a final Top Project List created. o Top Project List to be presented to MWG for validation.

APPENDIX D FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Appendix E

Screening Tool

APPENDIX E FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Screening Tool Project List Screening Tool Overview and Components New funding opportunities and potential partnerships often emerge rapidly. However, with limited funding available by state and federal funding opportunities, competition for external dollars is increasingly high. The project screening tool will allow users to quickly identify projects that could be eligible for these emerging opportunities and focus more time on the application process and less on the project identification. The tool will continue to be updated and utilized by the MWG. Key variables of the Project List data were selected as sorting components. This was useful in the development of the Strategy because projects could be grouped by common features such as: • Military Stakeholders – This search criterion categorizes transportation improvement projects by the relevant military stakeholder. Projects can often be relevant to more than one military installation. The military stakeholders are as follows: Oceanside Recruiting Center, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (Camp Pendleton), U.S. Coast Guard Station (Coast Guard), Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego (MCRD), Marine Corps Air Station Miramar (Miramar), Naval Base Coronado (NBC), Naval Base Point Loma (NBPL), Naval Base San Diego (NBSD), Navy Broadway Complex (Broadway), Naval Medical Center, Naval Outlying Landing Field Imperial Beach (NOLF), and Silver Strand Training Complex (SSTC). • Project Type – This search criterion categorizes transportation improvement projects based on the project type. The project types are as follows: Active Transportation, COASTER, Freeways and Highways, Freight Rail, Gate, iCommute, Intermodal Transit Center, Land Use, Local Streets/Roads, Micromobility, Park & Ride, Rapid, SPRINTER, Streetcar/Shuttle, Transit, and Trolley. • Project Cost - This search criterion categorizes transportation improvement projects into cost categories such as less than 100k, $100k-$1m, $1m-$10m, $10m-$100m, and more than $100m. • Project Source – This search criterion categorizes transportation improvement projects based on the source of the project. • Relevant Jurisdiction – This search criterion categorizes transportation improvement projects based on the jurisdiction the project is located within. The relevant jurisdictions are as follows: City of San Diego, Port of San Diego, Oceanside, Vista, San Diego county, Escondido, Chula Vista, National City, Coronado, Imperial Beach, Carlsbad, Encinitas, Solana Beach, Del Mar, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, El Cajon, Santee, and San Marcos. • Project Location – Projects can be sorted by project location using the military stakeholders and/or relevant jurisdiction search criteria.

User Experience The image below depicts the user interface of the Screening Tool. Users can select and add different search criteria to find relevant projects that match the selected criteria from the project lists.

APPENDIX E FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Appendix F

Costing Methodology

APPENDIX F FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

DISCLAIMER: METHODOLOGY AND COSTING CURRENTLY BEING REFINED.

Methodology

Previously Costed Projects

For the projects previously estimated, the following steps were followed to establish the current construction cost and the escalated cost to Year of Execution (YOE).

Several different cost indices are used to monitor construction costs in the United States. One widely- used index is the Construction Cost Index (CCI) maintained by Engineering News Record.

Using the ENR Construction Cost Index as the basis, escalation factors were calculated from the year estimated to 2019. These factors were then applied to the previously estimated cost to escalate them to today’s dollars. Refer to Appendix A for escalation rate calculations, from 2011 to 2019 and from 2014 to 2019.

A 3.0% per annum rate of escalation was used to calculate the escalated cost to Year of Execution (YOE) from current year, 2019. Refer to Appendix B for escalation rate calculations, from 2019 to 2035 and from 2019 to 2050. These factors were applied to the escalated project cost in today’s dollars to calculate the escalated cost to Year of Execution (YOE).

Previously estimated project costs were sourced from the following documents:

1. Caltrans 2014 DSMP Projects List 2. National City FY-2018 CIP 3. SANDAG SD Forward RTP Appendix A

New Projects

ROM Estimates for new projects were based on detailed measurements of quantities when possible, and reasonable assumptions / allowances for items not clearly defined / scoped out, and priced in today’s dollars. Project lengths were provided by the Engineer.

Total project cost includes direct construction cost, design contingency and soft cost.

Mobility projects where the scope needs only to provide shuttles / buses with operators, NO mark- ups, design contingency and soft cost were included.

For pricing new projects - RS Means cost data and cost data available from previous projects, with necessary adjustments, were used in calculating the project construction cost.

A 3.0% per annum rate of escalation was used to calculate the escalated cost to Year of Execution (YOE) from current year, 2019. See Appendix B for escalation rate calculations, from 2019 to 2035 and from 2019 to 2050. These factors were applied to the escalated project cost in today’s dollars to calculate the escalated cost to Year of Execution (YOE).

57 SANDAG Military Multimodal San Diego, CA Appendix A 09/27/19

Criteria: Region: Los Angeles, CA Estimate Date 07/15/11 Construction Start 07/01/18 Construction Completion 07/01/20

Derived: Construction Duration: 731 Days Calendar days Construction Duration: 24 months Construction Midpoint: 07/01/19

Year Time Rate Total Compounded Rate 1/1/2011 2011 0.47 3.2% 1.5% 1/1/2012 2012 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 4.54% 1/1/2013 2013 1.00 2.5% 2.5% 7.15% 1/1/2014 2014 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 10.36% 1/1/2015 2015 1.00 2.1% 2.1% 12.68% 1/1/2016 2016 1.00 3.5% 3.5% 16.57% 1/1/2017 2017 1.00 4.0% 4.0% 21.17% 1/1/2018 2018 1.00 3.1% 3.1% 24.93% 1/1/2019 2019 0.50 3.5% 1.7% 27.10% 1/1/2020 2020 0.00 3.5% 0.0% 27.10%

Total Escalation: 27.1%

58 Prepared by EQS Consultants, Inc. Page 1 of 2 SANDAG Military Multimodal San Diego, CA Appendix A 09/27/19

Criteria: Region: Los Angeles, CA Estimate Date 07/15/14 Construction Start 07/01/18 Construction Completion 07/01/20

Derived: Construction Duration: 731 Days Calendar days Construction Duration: 24 months Construction Midpoint: 07/01/19

Year Time Rate Total Compounded Rate 1/1/2014 2014 0.47 3.0% 1.4% 1/1/2015 2015 1.00 2.1% 2.1% 3.53% 1/1/2016 2016 1.00 3.5% 3.5% 7.10% 1/1/2017 2017 1.00 4.0% 4.0% 11.33% 1/1/2018 2018 1.00 3.1% 3.1% 14.78% 1/1/2019 2019 0.50 3.5% 1.7% 16.78% Midpoint Year Rate 1/1/2020 2020 0.00 3.5% 0.0% 16.78%

Total Escalation: 16.8%

59 Prepared by EQS Consultants, Inc. Page 2 of 2 SANDAG Military Multimodal San Diego, CA Appendix B 09/27/19

Criteria: Region: Los Angeles, CA Estimate Date 09/27/19 Construction Start 07/01/34 Construction Completion 07/01/36

Derived: Construction Duration: 731 Days Calendar days Construction Duration: 24 months Construction Midpoint: 07/01/35

Year Time Rate Total Compounded Rate 1/1/2019 2019 0.26 3.5% 0.9% 1/1/2020 2020 1.00 3.5% 3.5% 4.45% 1/1/2021 2021 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 7.59% 1/1/2022 2022 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 10.81% 1/1/2023 2023 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 14.14% 1/1/2024 2024 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 17.56% 1/1/2025 2025 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 21.09% 1/1/2026 2026 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 24.72% 1/1/2027 2027 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 28.46% 1/1/2028 2028 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 32.32% 1/1/2029 2029 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 36.29% 1/1/2030 2030 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 40.38% 1/1/2031 2031 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 44.59% 1/1/2032 2032 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 48.92% 1/1/2033 2033 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 53.39% 1/1/2034 2034 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 57.99% 1/1/2035 2035 0.50 3.0% 1.5% 60.35%

Total Escalation: 60.4%

60 Prepared by EQS Consultants, Inc. Page 1 of 2 SANDAG Military Multimodal San Diego, CA Appendix B 09/27/19

Criteria: Region: Los Angeles, CA Estimate Date 09/27/19 Construction Start 07/01/49 Construction Completion 07/01/51

Derived: Construction Duration: 730 Days Calendar days Construction Duration: 24 months Construction Midpoint: 07/01/50

Year Time Rate Total Compounded Rate 1/1/2019 2019 0.26 3.5% 0.9% 1/1/2020 2020 1.00 3.5% 3.5% 4.45% 1/1/2021 2021 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 7.59% 1/1/2022 2022 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 10.81% 1/1/2023 2023 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 14.14% 1/1/2024 2024 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 17.56% 1/1/2025 2025 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 21.09% 1/1/2026 2026 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 24.72% 1/1/2027 2027 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 28.46% 1/1/2028 2028 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 32.32% 1/1/2029 2029 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 36.29% 1/1/2030 2030 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 40.38% 1/1/2031 2031 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 44.59% 1/1/2032 2032 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 48.92% 1/1/2033 2033 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 53.39% 1/1/2034 2034 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 57.99% 1/1/2035 2035 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 62.73% 1/1/2036 2036 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 67.62% 1/1/2037 2037 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 72.64% 1/1/2038 2038 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 77.82% 1/1/2039 2039 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 83.16% 1/1/2040 2040 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 88.65% 1/1/2041 2041 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 94.31% 1/1/2042 2042 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 100.14% 1/1/2043 2043 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 106.15% 1/1/2044 2044 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 112.33% 1/1/2045 2045 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 118.70% 1/1/2046 2046 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 125.26% 1/1/2047 2047 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 132.02% 1/1/2048 2048 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 138.98% 1/1/2049 2049 1.00 3.0% 3.0% 146.15% 1/1/2050 2050 0.50 3.0% 1.5% 149.81%

Total Escalation: 149.8%

61 Prepared by EQS Consultants, Inc. Page 2 of 2 Appendix G

Key Funding Sources

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Typical Grant Objectives Grant funding programs can be obtained through various departments at a regional, state and federal level. Below is a list of typical grant objectives and respective applicable projects. Use the table below to provide guidance in identifying potential grant opportunities.

Typical Grant Description of Objective Applicable Projects to Consider Objectives

• Complete Streets Projects • Smart Mobility Projects • Climate Ready Transportation • Environmental Justice and Disadvantaged Community outreach • Preserves the livability of California’s communities Planning for housing and meets the States GHG emission reduction • Projects implementing modal plans per California Transportation Plan (CTP 2040) Sustainability standards by promoting efficient mobility for people, - Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan (ITSP) goods, and services. - California Freight Mobility Plan (CFMP) - California State Rail Plan - California State Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan - California High-Speed Rail Business Plan - Statewide Transit Strategic Plan - California Aviation System Plan • Median Barrier • Roadside Design Improvement at • Safety Edge Curves • Backplates with Retroreflective • Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Borders Intersections • Corridor Access Management • Low Cost Countermeasures at Stop- • Dedicated Left- and Right-Turn Lanes Implements safety measures for all modes of Controlled Intersections at Intersections transportation. Increases safety / security of the Safety • Leading Pedestrian Interval • Roundabouts transportation system for motorized and active • Local Road Safety Plan • Yellow Change Intervals transportation users. • • Medians and Pedestrian Crossing USLIMITS2 (Establish safe speed limits) Islands in Urban and Suburban Areas • Enhanced Delineation and Friction for • Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Horizontal Curves • Road Diet • Longitudinal Rumble Strips and • Walkways Stripes on Two-Lane Roads • Road Safety Audit

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Typical Grant Description of Objective Applicable Projects to Consider Objectives

Increases alternative commuting options for people to travel to places of work, education, recreation, • Transit Project or Program and play without being in a single occupancy vehicle Mobility • TDM and Share Mobility Project or Program (e.g. biking, walking, transit, microtransit, • rideshare). Promotes active lifestyles, which Active Transportation Project or Program contributes to physical and mental well-being

Protect / enhance the transportation system and the environment by: • San Diego Forward identified project • Improving the quality of life • Freight Project Preservation • Promoting consistency between • Freeway/Highway Capacity Project transportation planning improvements and • Capital Improvement Projects growth and economic patterns

• Transit Project or Program • TDM Project or Program Promote the use of technology and innovative • Active Transportation Project or Program designs to improve the performance and social Innovation • Electric Vehicle Charging equity of our transportation system and provide • sustainable transportation options. Planning for autonomous vehicles • Smart Cities initiatives • Shared mobility service planning

Support the economic vitality of the area (i.e. enables global competitiveness, enables increased productivity, improves efficiency, increases • Commute trip reduction project Economy economic equity by enabling robust economic • Park and Ride lots opportunities for individuals with barriers to • Strategic planning for transit ridership employment and for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs), etc.).

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Typical Grant Description of Objective Applicable Projects to Consider Objectives

Decrease exposure to local pollution sources, • Safe Routes to School Projects reduce serious injuries and fatalities on the Health • Public Transit Projects transportation system, and promote physical activity • especially through transportation means. Traffic Calming and safety Enhancement Plans

Promote transportation solutions that focus on and prioritize the needs of communities most affected by poverty, air pollution and climate change, and • Long Range Development Plans promote solutions that integrate community values • Affordable Housing Projects Social Equity with transportation safety and performance while • Transportation modeling studies that address active transportation, emerging encouraging greater than average public technology, public health, VMT and other impacts involvement in the transportation decision making process.

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Potential Funding Sources This section identifies potential funding sources applicable to prospective projects pursued under the Military Multimodal Access Strategy. Submitted funding applications compete with other agencies and other project types. To provide competitive applications, it is important to discuss project reach beyond military jurisdiction. Coordinating with public transportation agencies and the private sector, conversations across various military installations and indirect improvements can be held. These conversations might include reductions in greenhouse gas emissions likely to result from these transportation projects. In doing so, applicants suggest that funding these projects promote the planning, efficiency and growth of the military and surrounding communities. Public Sources Program Name Agency Description Eligible Projects

Federal Lands FLAP, FHWA Provides funds for projects on federal • Transportation planning, research, engineering, preventive Access Program lands like access transportation maintenance rehabilitation, restoration, construction, and (FLAP) facilities that are located on or reconstruction of federal lands access transportation facilities adjacent to, or that provide access to, • Operation and maintenance of transit facilities federal lands. • Any transportation project eligible under title 23 of the United States Code that is within or adjacent to, or that provides access to, federal lands open to the public

Federal Lands FHWA The FLTP funds projects that improve • Program administration, transportation planning, research, preventive Transportation access within the federal estate maintenance, engineering, rehabilitation, restoration, construction, and Program (FLTP) (national forests, national parks, reconstruction of federal lands transportation facilities national wildlife refuges, national • Operations and maintenance of transit facilities recreation areas, and other federal • Any transportation project eligible under title 23 of the United States public lands) on transportation facilities Code that is within or adjacent to, or that provides access to, federal in the national federal lands lands open to the public transportation inventory and owned and maintained by the federal government.

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Program Name Agency Description Eligible Projects

Highway Safety FHWA The HSIP is a core federal-aid Any project on a public road, trail, or path that is consistent with the state’s Improvement program with the purpose of achieving Strategic Highway Safety Plan and corrects a safety problem is eligible for Program (HSIP) a significant reduction in fatalities and HSIP funding. Eligible projects include: serious injuries on all public roads, • including non-state-owned public roads Intersection improvements and roads on tribal lands. • Construction of shoulders • Traffic calming • Improvements for bicyclists, pedestrians, and individuals with disabilities • Minimum standards of retro-reflectivity of traffic signs and pavement markings

National Highway FHWA The NHPP provides support for the • Construction, reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, Performance condition and performance of the preservation, or operational improvements of NHS roadways and Program (NHPP) National Highway System (NHS), for bridges the construction of new facilities on the • Bridge and tunnel inspection and evaluation NHS, and to ensure that investments • A project to reduce the risk of failure of critical NHS infrastructure of federal-aid funds in highway • Construction, reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, construction are directed to support and preservation of, and operational improvements for a federal aid progress toward the achievement of highway or bridge not on the NHS, if the project is in the same performance targets established in a corridor and in proximity to a fully access-controlled NHS route state's asset management plan for the • Construction of a transit project eligible for assistance NHS • Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways • Highway safety improvements • Capital and operating costs for traffic and traveler information, monitoring, management, and control facilities and programs • Infrastructure-based Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) capital improvements • Environmental restoration and pollution abatement • Control of noxious weeds and establishment of native species • Environmental mitigation related to NHPP projects • Construction of publicly owned intracity or intercity bus terminals

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Program Name Agency Description Eligible Projects

Bus and Bus Federal Transit The Grants for Buses and Bus • Capital projects to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses, vans, Facilities Program Administration Facilities program makes federal and related equipment, and to construct bus-related facilities, (Section 5339) (FTA)/Caltrans resources available to states and including technological changes or innovations to modify low or no Division of Rail and direct recipients to replace, emission vehicles or facilities. Mass Transportation rehabilitate, and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities. Eligible recipients include direct recipients that operate fixed route bus service or that allocate funding to fixed route bus operators; state or local governmental entities; and federally- recognized Indian tribes that operate fixed route bus service.

Rural Public FTA/Caltrans Division This program provides capital, • An eligible recipient may use the funding for capital, operating, and Transportation of Rail and Mass planning, and operating assistance to administrative expenses for public transportation projects that meet Program (Section Transportation states to support public transportation the needs of rural communities. Examples of eligible activities include 5311) in rural areas with populations less capital projects; operating costs of equipment and facilities for use in than 50,000, where many residents public transportation; and the acquisition of public transportation often rely on public transit to reach services, including service agreements with private providers of public their destinations. Funds may be used transportation services. for public transit services operating: within small urban and rural communities, among small urban and rural communities, or between small urban and rural communities and urbanized areas (cities of 50,000 or more).

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Program Name Agency Description Eligible Projects

Rural Transit FTA/Cal ACT The RTAP provides a source of • An eligible recipient may use the funding for capital, operating, and Assistance Program funding to assist in the design and administrative expenses for public transportation projects that meet (RTAP) implementation of training and the needs of rural communities. Examples of eligible activities include technical assistance projects and other capital projects; operating costs of equipment and facilities for use in support services tailored to meet the public transportation; and the acquisition of public transportation needs of transit operators in services, including service agreements with private providers of public nonurbanized areas. Eligible recipients transportation services. include states, local governments, and providers of rural transit services.

Surface FHWA/Caltrans The STBGP provides flexible funding • States and metropolitan regions may use these funds for highway, Transportation that may be used by states and bridge, transit (including intercity bus terminals), and pedestrian and Block Grant localities for projects to preserve and bicycle infrastructure projects. Program improve the conditions and • Eligible projects include: performance on any federal aid o Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, highway, bridge and tunnel projects on restoration, preservation, or operational improvements for any public road, pedestrian and highways, bridges, and tunnels on any public roadway bicycle infrastructure, and transit o Construction of new bridges and tunnels on a federal-aid capital projects, including intercity bus highway terminals. o Inspection and evaluation of bridges, tunnels, and other highway assets as well as training for bridge and tunnel inspectors o Transit capital projects o Bicycle, pedestrian, and recreational trails o Environmental mitigation efforts

Transportation U.S. DOT The TIGER Discretionary Grant Eligible applicants for TIGER Discretionary Grants are state, local, and tribal Investment program provides a unique opportunity governments, including US territories, transit agencies, port authorities, MPOs, Generating for the DOT to invest in road, rail, and other political subdivisions of state or local governments. Funding is eligible Economic Recovery transit, and port projects that promise for: (TIGER) grants to achieve national objectives • Highway or bridge projects eligible under title 23, United States Code • Public transportation projects eligible under chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code • Freight rail projects • High speed and intercity passenger rail projects • Port infrastructure investments

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Program Name Agency Description Eligible Projects

Partnerships to Centers for Disease PICH is a three-year initiative that Eligible transportation-related improvements include projects that improve Improve Community Control and supports implementation of evidence- community designs to make streets safe for pedestrians, bicyclists, and public Health (PICH) Prevention (CDC) based strategies to improve the health transit users (e.g., neighborhood slow zones, community-wide traffic calming). of communities and reduce the prevalence of chronic disease. Awardees will address, in their communities, chronic conditions in tobacco use and exposure, poor nutrition, physical inactivity, and lack of access to opportunities for chronic disease prevention, risk reduction, and disease management.

Transportation FHWA FAST Act replaced the TAP program • Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Alternatives with a set-aside of fund under the • Safe routes projects for non-drivers Program (TAP) STBGP. The TA set-aside • Construction of turnouts and overlooks encompasses a variety of smaller- • Community improvement activities including vegetation management scale transportation projects such as and historic preservation pedestrian and bicycle facilities, • Environmental mitigation activity recreational trails, safe routes to school projects, community improvements such as historic preservation and vegetation management, and environmental mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity.

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Program Name Agency Description Eligible Projects

Caltrans Sustainable Caltrans New grant funding through Senate Bill Funds transportation planning studies of interregional and statewide Transportation 1 significance, in partnership with Caltrans. Sustainable Communities Project Planning Grant Types: Program • Active transportation plans • Studies that advance a community’s effort to reduce transportation related greenhouse gases • Complete Streets Plans • First Mile / Last Mile project development planning • Jobs and affordable housing proximity studies • Studies that evaluate accessibility and connectivity of the multimodal transportation network

Urbanized Area FTA Federal resources available to • Planning, engineering, design and evaluation of transit projects and Formula Grants – urbanized areas and to governors for other technical transportation-related studies Section 5307 transit capital and operating • Capital investments in bus and bus-related activities (e.g., assistance in urbanized areas and for replacement, overhaul and rebuilding of buses, crime prevention and transportation-related planning security equipment and construction of maintenance and passenger facilities) • Capital investments in new and existing fixed guideway systems (e.g., rolling stock, overhaul and rebuilding of vehicles, track, signals, communications, and computer hardware and software) • Associated transit improvements and certain expenses associated with mobility management programs are eligible under the program

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Program Name Agency Description Eligible Projects

Port Infrastructure Department of The Consolidated Appropriations Act, For the purposes of these grants, a “coastal seaport” is a seaport capable of Development Transportation 2019 (“FY 2019 Appropriations Act”), receiving deep-draft vessels (drafting greater or equal to 20 feet) from a foreign Program appropriated $292,730,000 for the Port or domestic port. Infrastructure Development Program Department seeks projects that will: (1) advance technology-supported safety to make grants to improve port and design efficiency improvements; (2) bring facilities to a state of good repair facilities at coastal seaports. The Act and improve resiliency; (3) promote efficient trade in energy resources; (4) directed that $92,730,000 of the promote exports of manufacturing, agriculture, or other goods; and (5) for only appropriated funds shall be for grants the top 15 coastal ports, support the safe flow of agricultural and food products, to the 15 coastal seaports that handled free of pests and disease, domestically and internationally. Accordingly, the the greatest number of loaded foreign Department expects to award at least one project that advances each of the and domestic twenty-foot equivalent aforementioned project outcomes, but a project does not need to address one units of containerized cargo in 2016, or more of these outcomes to be awarded. as identified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Funds for the Port Infrastructure Development Program are to be awarded as discretionary grants on a competitive basis for projects that will improve the safety, efficiency, or reliability of the movement of goods into, out of, around, or within a coastal seaport, as well as the unloading and loading of cargo at a coastal seaport. All Port Infrastructure Development Program funding grant recipients must meet all applicable Federal requirements, including the Buy American Act.

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Program Name Agency Description Eligible Projects

Capital Investment FTA Funds transit capital investments, • Bus and Bus-related Facilities Grants – Section including heavy rail, commuter rail, o Buses and other rolling stock, ferry boats, ancillary 5309 light rail, streetcars and bus rapid equipment, and the construction of bus facilities (e.g., transit maintenance facilities, garages, storage areas, waiting facilities and terminals, transit malls and centers, and transfer facilities and intermodal facilities) o Bus rehabilitation and leasing, Park & Ride facilities, parking lots associated with transit facilities, bus passenger shelters, and intercity bus stations and terminals • Modernization of Fixed Guideway Systems o Infrastructure improvements such as track and right-of-way rehabilitation, modernization of stations and maintenance facilities, rolling stock purchase and rehabilitation, and signal and power modernization • New Fixed Guideway Capital Projects (New Starts and Small Starts) o Preliminary engineering (PE), acquisition of real property (including relocation costs), final design and construction, and initial acquisition of rolling stock for the system • Corridor bus projects that either operate in a separate right-of-way during peak hours or contain significant investment in corridor-based bus improvements o Corridors to Support New Fixed Guideway Projects o Protecting rights-of-way through acquisition o Construction of dedicated bus and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes o Park & Ride lot o “Nonvehicular” capital improvements that will increase transit use in the corridor (e.g., additional safety features that would encourage riders to use transit, walkways and pathways that make transit more readily available, bus shelters, and joint development projects that would improve the livability of a community and increase the benefits transit offers) Flexible program that provides Community HUD Urban redevelopment, but Park & Ride lot projects in urban redevelopment communities with resources to Development Block areas will be considered address a wide range of unique Grants community development needs APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Program Name Agency Description Eligible Projects

State Transportation CTC STIP is a multi-year capital • Interregional Improvement Program Improvement improvement program of o State highway, intercity passenger rail, mass transit Program (STIP) transportation projects on and off the guideway, or grade separation projects. Non-capital costs State Highway System, funded with for transportation system management or transportation revenues from the Transportation demand management may be included where Caltrans Investment Fund and other funding finds the project to be a cost-effective substitute for capital sources. STIP programming generally expenditures occurs every two years. o Intercity rail projects (including interregional commuter rail and grade separation projects) and to improvements outside urbanized areas on interregional road system routes • Regional Improvement Program o Capital projects (including project development costs) needed to improve transportation in the region o Improving State highways, local roads, public transit (including buses), intercity rail, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, grade separations, transportation system management, transportation demand management, soundwalls, intermodal facilities, and safety o Non-capital costs for transportation system management or transportation demand management may be included where the regional agency finds the project to be a cost- effective substitute for capital expenditures. Other non- capital projects (e.g. road and transit maintenance) are not eligible

Defence Community Department of The program would provide critical • Waiting for approval by both chambers. Infrastructure Defence funding for off-base community Program infrastructure projects that support mission readiness and resilience, including transportation, schools, hospitals, police, fire, emergency response, water, wastewater, telecommunications, electric, gas, or other utility infrastructure that is owned by a state or local government.

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Public-Private Partnerships (P3) In addition to pursuing funding from public sources, the private sector is an increasingly willing partner on transportation improvement projects. Public stakeholders can engage the private sector on one or more components of project delivery including planning, design, construction, finance, operations, and maintenance. The benefits and challenges of P3s for public stakeholders include:

Benefits Challenges

• Reduced financial risk • Condensed project delivery timelines • Complex contracting • Quality assurances • Matching expertise with project scope • Lower ongoing costs • Management and oversight • Innovation • Partner financial stability • Greater access to financial resources

Figure 1 - Different P3 Models (LA METRO)

APPENDIX G FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Appendix H

Outreach Summary

APPENDIX H FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Project Public Participation Process The project team conducted public outreach throughout the project schedule to inform the development of deliverables and the direction of the strategy.

Stakeholders

Project Development Team A project development team (PDT) was formed to lead the project. The PDT includes representatives from SANDAG, Military Working Group (MWG), Caltrans, and the consultant team. The purpose of the PDT was to provide a regular point of contact with primary stakeholders to guide the development of the following deliverables:

• Briefing Book – documents existing conditions and challenges surrounding military installations • Project Inventory Tool – documents and sort projects of importance to the MWG • Final Strategy Report – documents project process, methodologies, and strategies moving forward

The PDT generally met bimonthly and played a key role in the review of all project deliverables.

Military Working Group The Military Working Group (MWG) includes representatives from all military branches with installations in the San Diego region, local jurisdictions adjacent to military installations, as well as SANDAG staff and the Port of San Diego (Table 1). The MWG, which regularly convened every two months, was consulted for feedback on project deliverables and policy level decision making.

As part of the initial phase of the project, SANDAG staff and the consultant team met and interviewed representatives of the MWG in addition to the region’s transit agencies and Caltrans District 11 staff to understand existing challenges to accessing military installations.

Table 1. Military Working Group Members Marine Corps Installation West Navy Region Southwest Navy Facilities Engineering Command Marine Corps Recruitment Depot U.S. Coast Guard San Diego Sector City of Oceanside City of San Diego City of Coronado City of National City City of Imperial Beach County of San Diego Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) North Country Transit District (NCTD) Port of San Diego SANDAG

APPENDIX H FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Outreach Process

Stakeholder Interviews Stakeholder “interviews” were held with Working Group members and other agencies who may impact military mobility. The purpose of the interviews was to provide information about the existing environment and challenges of military and civilian personnel’s mobility to and from military installations in San Diego County. Each stakeholder contacted was provided a list of standardized questions about military mobility to help stir conversation and identify documents and individuals to refer to during the initial stages of the Strategy and the development of the Project List. Table 2 shows the list of stakeholders who were contacted and responded to this outreach activity.

Table 2. Organizations Contacted for Stakeholder "Interviews"

Received Organization Response Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Y Marine Corps Recruit Depot Y Marine Corps Miramar Air Station N Naval Base Point Loma N Naval Base San Diego Y Naval Base Coronado Y US Coast Guard Y City of Coronado Y City of Imperial Beach Y City of National City Y City of Oceanside Y City of San Diego Y County of San Diego Y Port of San Diego Y Airport N Caltrans Y MTS Y NCTD Y

Below is the list of questions provided to the stakeholder to help spur conversation during the interview:

• How do you see military traffic influencing the San Diego region? • What is your priority for the transportation network? • What are the challenges you face to improve transportation conditions? • The following documents are being reviewed as part of this data gathering to identify current planned projects and policies: o Are there any other documents we should be looking at? • Are there any old projects, strategies, or ideas that have been tested, identified, or thought of in the past but did not work as intended or did not materialize as anticipated? • Are there any new projects, strategies, or ideas that you have to address transportation issues? • Are there regional transportation-related programs you have identified that you specifically support or do not support? • Are there specific areas, either physical infrastructure programs or behavioral patterns, that you would like to note as part of this data gathering? • Is there anyone else you think we should be talking to?

The information gathered during this outreach activity was used to help develop the Project List (see Appendix B) and develop the Briefing Book (see Appendix A).

APPENDIX H FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Fall 2018 Workshop On behalf of SANDAG and the San Diego Regional Military Working Group (MWG), a workshop was held on December 3, 2018 to discuss potential transportation projects that can improve travel options to military bases in the San Diego region. The workshop included more than 75 participants representing the region’s military installations, adjacent local governments, transportation agencies, SANDAG staff, non-profits, and the general public.

Participants of the workshop were broken into five table groups where each table focused on one or multiple military installations in the San Diego region. Table 3 shows how the military installations were grouped for discussion.

Table 3. Military Installation Groupings at Fall 2018 Workshop

Table Military Installations Discussed Table #1 Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Table #2 Marine Corps Air Station Miramar Table #3 Naval Base San Diego Table #4 Naval Base Coronado Naval Base Point Loma, Marine Corps Recruit Depot, and Table #5 US Coast Guard

At each group, participants were provided the following materials catered towards the military installations the group focused on:

• project matrix of existing planned projects • map of the existing planned projects • mobility report cards describing the existing conditions of various travel modes • summary of existing challenges

Each group performed a mapping exercise for their respective military installation grouping. Using the above material, participants at each table discussed the list of existing planned projects to see if there were any missing on the list and if there were any that should not be considered as a priority for the MWG. Participant comments and feedback were documented to aid the development of the final list of projects for the MWG to consider. After the mapping exercise, representatives from each group presented the top key findings that their group had.

Based on the workshop discussion, several key themes and highlights were documented including the following:

• Develop mobility options that help military personnel not only get to a military base but help move them once inside • Look at first and last mile solutions that help get military personnel from key transit centers surrounding military bases • Look at opportunities to reconfigure the space on roadways adjacent to military bases to help meet demand • Find innovative ways to identify potential revenue for high priority projects

The feedback provided by participants allowed the project team to assemble and prioritize the MWG’s list of transportation projects and programs.

APPENDIX H FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Meetings Summary Table 4. Project Meetings

Meeting Date Time and Location Topics Discussed 6/19/2017 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Meeting to inform the MWG that SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 Caltrans awarded SANDAG a grant to develop the Strategy and to discuss next steps in bringing a consultant onboard. 9/18/2017 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Meeting with the MWG to discuss key SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 issues for various installations and jurisdictions for consideration during the project. 12/11/2017 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Meeting with the MWG to introduce the SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 consultants (Kimley Horn & Associates). 12/04/2017 3:30 p.m. to 5 p.m. Meeting to discuss project overview, SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 10B roles and responsibilities and draft a schedule. 1/23/2018 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. Project updates regarding interviews SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 8B with military and jurisdictional POCs. Discussing schedule of future meetings. 2/26/2018 2:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. Primarily provided feedback on the RTP SANDAG -Conf. Rm. 8B Draft document. Meeting identified the need for document to take a regional and local perspective. Methodology and criteria were also discussed to determine project accessibility and multimodal perspectives. 3/5/2018 - MWG 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Update on stakeholder interviews and SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 discussion on potential San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan projects that impact military installations. 4/30/2018 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. This meeting focused on stakeholder SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 8B feedback from interviews, how RTP Projects could discuss the feedback, and discussing the Data Briefing Book which captures existing setting of the region. 6/18/2018 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Discussed the approach and structure SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 8A of the Existing Conditions Report. Established objectives and agenda for the workshop as well as project list and methodology for prioritizing projects. 6/25/2018 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. Informed the MWG of key steps in SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 developing the Strategy and to provide input on specific activities. 9/10/2018 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. Discussed feedback from Existing SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 8B Conditions Report. Sorting tool for Project List Development was demonstrated. Draft list of Criteria was also presented. 10/15/2018 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Project update, request for MWG to SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 review Briefing Book, and discussion on project evaluation criteria.

APPENDIX H FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Meeting Date Time and Location Topics Discussed 12/3/2018 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Workshop to discuss current Admiral Baker Club challenges, highlight projects of interest, and identify projects that should be considered for the final project inventory. 2/11/2019 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Summary of workshop discussions and SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 request for MWG feedback on approach for prioritizing projects and developing cost estimates. 3/4/2019 10 a.m. to 12 a.m. Project update and discussion of SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 8A feedback to date. Determined schedule for Military Working Group Meeting and Borders Committee Update. 3/25/2019 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Discussion with the MWG on the SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 mission, vision, and values that inform the Strategy and the methodology to identify projects for each geographic focus. 5/2/2019 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. General project updates and project SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 8B recap focused on Criteria Methodology for Prioritization. 5/13/2019 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. Workshop with the MWG to review ten SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 projects and select the top five for each installation. 6/10/2019 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. Workshop with the MWG to discuss a SANDAG – Conf. Rm. 7 strategic framework and strategic actions for championing projects in the Strategy.

APPENDIX H FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Appendix I

Military Installation One-Page Profiles

APPENDIX I FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft

Data current as of December 2018

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (Camp Pendleton) is located in North San Diego County, neighbored by the City of Oceanside to the South, the community of Fallbrook to the east, and Orange County to the north. Camp Pendleton experiences an average daytime population of 70,000 employees, military family members, and visitors. There are two north-south corridors, the Interstate 5 and 15, and one major east-west facility, State Route 76, that provide access to Camp Pendleton via driving, carpooling, and vanpooling. The installation is located two miles north of the Oceanside Transit Center (OTC) where commuters can utilize the Amtrak, Metrolink, NCTD COASTER, and NCTD SPRINTER.

Commute Origin of Camp Pendleton

Percent of Commute Origin Commuters North San Diego Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton County 60% Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (Camp Pendleton) is located in North San Diego County,Riverside neighbored County by the City of Oceanside24% to the South, the community of Fallbrook to the east, and Orange County to the north. CampCity Pendletonof San Diego experiences an average7% daytime population of 70,000 employees, military family members, and visitors. There are Orangetwo north County-south corridors, the Interstate4% 5 and 15, and one major east-west facility, State Route 76, that provide access to Camp PendletonOther via driving, carpooling,5% and vanpooling. The installation is located two miles north of the Oceanside Transit Center (OTC) where commuters can utilize the Total Responses 324 Amtrak, Metrolink, NCTD COASTER, and NCTD SPRINTER. Source: NCTD Survey, March 2012

Commute Mode to Camp Pendleton

Drive Bike/Walk Alone 5% 86%

Carpool Motorcycle 8% 8%

Vanpool Kiss N Ride 4% 8%

Transit 7%

Source: NCTD Survey, March 2012 Camp Pendleton – Existing Connectivity Commuting Patterns Top Challenges for Camp Pendleton

• More than 38,000 personnel and Traffic and Regional Connectivity families housed on base • SR 76 experiences heavy traffic causing delays for commuters • Most individuals living on base use • Cut-through traffic on the local roadway network in Capistrano cars to get to their desired neighborhood near Main Gate; San Rafael Road is used to bypass destinations on and off base the queue between I-5 and Main Gate • Average of 2 vehicles per military family living on base Mobility • Over 60% of people living in barracks • Camp Pendleton is geographically large, contains steep slopes, and use personal vehicles has camp areas spread out throughout the base, which constrains • Primary commute mode for personnel access options living off base is driving alone • Shuttle system for internal trips difficult to justify as internal trips are often about moving goods, not people • Only one-quarter of base residents have used transit services Additional challenges can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A)

Data current as of December 2018 Mobility Report Card Marine Corps Camp Pendleton

Supportive Programs/Infrastructure Mobility Options On Base City of Oceanside

• Walkable within camp areas; not • Substantial sidewalks and low speed limits in between camp areas Downtown Class II bike lanes on Vandegrift • No existing bike network Blvd. (50 mph) to access San Luis Rey Gate Walking/ connecting camp areas • Mix of Class I, II, and III bike facilities on Old Biking • Steep terrain Pacific Hwy • Class III bike facilities on Las Pulgas Rd. & Stuart Mesa Rd.

• NCTD BREEZE Route 315 • NCTD BREEZE Route 315 Public Transit • No passenger rail access on base • Amtrak, Metrolink, COASTER, and SPRINTER services at Oceanside Transit Center • NCTD FLEX Routes 392 and 395 Microtransit • Internal shuttle mostly used for • NCTD FLEX Routes 392 and 395 goods movement • Vanpool subsidy with TIPS • SANDAG iCommute Vanpool • No existing High Occupancy Vehicle lanes on Carpool & Vanpool Program I-5 North from SR-52 to Oceanside or on SR- • No designated parking spaces for 78 carpool or vanpool

Carshare • Limited government fleet • No current programs

On-Demand • Waze Carpool • Waze Carpool Rideshare • Lyft with Security Clearance • Uber, Lyft

• No current programs Bikeshare • No current programs • Bikeshare not permitted on NCTD buses

Electric Bike & • No current programs • No current programs Scootershare

Neighborhood • No current programs • No current programs Electric Vehicle (NEV)

• Limited street parking close to base • Bluetooth Travel-time Origin and Destination (BlueTOAD) technology along Pacific Coast Other • High supply of parking on base Hwy

• Smart Growth Opportunity Area: Downtown Oceanside Data current as of December 2018 The detailed installation profile can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A).

Data current as of December 2018

Marine Corps Air Station Miramar

Marine Corps Aire Station Miramar (Miramar) is located in northeast San Diego and is surrounded by several communities and local jurisdictions. Mira Mesa immediately north of the base, University City to the west, Kearny Mesa to the south, Scripps Ranch to the north, City of Santee to the east, and Tierrasanta to the south. Miramar is the workplace for over 12,000 military personnel. There are three major north-south corridors, the Interstate 15 and 805, State Route 163 and one major east-west corridor, State Route 52 that provide access to Miramar via driving, carpooling, and vanpooling. The Interstate 15, Kearny Villa Road, and Miramar Road serve as the major corridors to and from the base. The installation is located two miles south of the Sorrento Valley Station where commuters can utilize the Amtrak or COASTER.

Commuting Patterns

• More than 3,500 service members living in on-base housing and barracks • Most military personnel seek housing in Riverside and San Diego County • The majority of people living on base use their personal vehicles to complete trips within the base • Approximately 7,500 service members, civilian employees, and government contractors commute to the base daily • Miramar personnel are registered in 25 vanpools, primarily from Riverside County and the City of Chula Vista • There are roughly 110 passenger non-tactical vehicles (NTVs) on Miramar that military personnel can access • Limited transportation options on base other than personally owned vehicles

Marine Corps Air Station Miramar – Existing Connectivity

Top Challenges for Miramar

Traffic and Regional Connectivity

• Congestion on nearby roadways and interstates during peak hours delays commuters travelling to and from base • Most off-base housing is not within a reasonable (one-mile) walking distance

Other

• Military personnel often transport heavy equipment which limits the types of vehicles that are usable • Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) can drop off riders on base but cannot pick up new passengers on base. TNC apps do not recognize or accept requests from passengers within the base due to security clearance requirements

Additional challenges can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A)

Data current as of December 2018 Mobility Report Card Marine Corps Air Station Miramar

Supportive Programs/Infrastructure Mobility Options On Base City of San Diego

• Walkable within Main Station Sector on West Miramar; not between • Mix of Class II bike lanes and Class III bike Walking/ sectors or between East and West route (sharrows) on Miramar Road Biking Miramar (50mph), Pomerado Road (45mph), and Kearny Villa Road (65mph) • Moderate to steep terrain

• MTS Route 31 • No transit services on base Public Transit • Multiple MTS routes serve transit centers • No passenger rail access on base near the base (UTC and Miramar College)

Microtransit • No current services • No current services

• Vanpool subsidy with TIPS • SANDAG iCommute Vanpool Carpool & Vanpool • High Occupancy Vehicle lanes on I-15 Program

• Greencommuter Pilot

• Over 100 non-tactical government Carshare fleet vehicles • Zipcar • Greencommuter Pilot

On-Demand • Waze Carpool • Waze Carpool Rideshare • Restricted Uber, Lyft access • Uber, Lyft

Bikeshare • Lime pilot • Lime, Discover Bike

• Electric bike: Lime, JUMP Electric Bike & • No current programs Scootershare • Electric scooter: Lime, Bird, Razor, Wheels, Wind Neighborhood Electric Vehicle • No current programs • No current programs (NEV) • Limited street parking close to base Other • High supply of parking on base • Smart Growth Opportunity Areas: University City and Mira Mesa Data current as of December 2018 The detailed installation profile can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A).

Data current as of December 2018

Marine Corps Recruit Depot

Marine Corps Recruit Depot (MCRD) is located in the City of San Diego in between Interstate 5 and the San Diego Bay and adjacent to the San Diego International Airport. One major north-south corridor, the Interstate 5, and one major east-west facility, the Interstate 8, connect to major roads that provide access to MCRD via driving, carpooling, and vanpooling. The facility is located less than two miles south of the Old Town Transit Center where commuters can utilize the Amtrak, COASTER, MTS Green Line Trolley, and several MTS bus routes. The Green Line Trolley also stops at the Washington Street Trolley Station, less than a mile away from MCRD.

Commute Origin of Marine Corps Recruit Depot Percent of Commute Origin Commuters City of San Diego 30% North San Diego County 17% Riverside County 11% Other* 10% South San Diego County 10% East San Diego County 10% Orange County 5% Los Angeles County 3% San Bernardino County 3% Total Responses 142 Source: MCRD provided zip code report data, March 2018.

Commuting Patterns

• Military personnel commute from a community within the county, primarily the City of San Diego • MCRD utilizes Transportation Demand Strategies to promote alternative commutes for personnel

Marine Corps Recruit Depot – Existing Connectivity

Top Challenges for Marine Corps Recruit Depot

Traffic and Regional Connectivity

• Community concerns about traffic resulting from proposed projects (additional rail line at-grade across Washington Street, the Airport Intermodal Transit Center, and the San Diego City Community Plan for the I-5/Pacific Highway)

Mobility

• Despite close proximity to MTS trolley and bus stops, inconsistent or unfriendly bicycle and pedestrian network connections limit first mile/last miles access to MCRD

Other

• Congestion between Washington Street Gate and I-5 causing delay for commuters

Additional challenges can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A)

Data current as of December 2018 Mobility Report Card Marine Corps Recruit Depot

Supportive Programs/Infrastructure Mobility Options On Base City of San Diego

• Intermittent Class II bike lanes along Barnett Walking/ • Walkable Ave. (40 mph), disappears at Gate 2 Biking • Class III bike route along Pacific Highway • MTS Route 10, 30, and 150 • Green Line Trolley station (Washington Public Transit • No public transportation on base Street) less than one mile from MCRD • Multiple transit services at Old Town Transit Center

Microtransit • No current services • No current services

• Vanpool subsidy with TIPS • SANDAG iCommute Vanpool • No existing High Occupancy Vehicle lanes Carpool & Vanpool Program on I-5 and I-8 • No designated parking spaces for carpool or vanpool

Carshare • No current programs • Zipcar

• Waze Carpool On-Demand Rideshare • Waze Carpool • Uber, Lyft

Bikeshare • No current programs • Lime, Discover Bike

• Electric bike: Lime, JUMP Electric Bike & • No current programs Scootershare • Electric scooter: Lime, Bird, Razor, Wheels, Wind

Neighborhood Electric • No current programs • No current programs Vehicle (NEV)

• Limited street parking close to base

Other • Limited parking on base • Smart Growth Opportunity Areas: Midway-Pacific Highway and San Diego Peninsula in Point Loma Data current as of December 2018 The detailed installation profile can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A).

Data current as of December 2018 Naval Base Coronado

Naval Base Coronado (NBC) is comprised of nine installations. More detailed information on the Naval Air Station North Island Coronado (NASNI), Naval Amphibious Base Coronado (NAB), Silver Strand Training Complex-South Coronado (SSTC), and Naval Outlying Landing Field, Imperial Beach (NOLF) can be found in the Briefing Book. The Navy provides on and off-base government housing options for military and civilian employees. Interstate 5 and State Route 75 are the major routes for NBC commuters.

Commute Origin of NBC Percent of Commute Origin Commuters City of San Diego 47%

South San Diego County 32% East San Diego County 12% Riverside County 4% North San Diego County 3% Los Angeles County 1% Other 2% Total Responses 1784 Source: iCommute Survey Results, July 2016

Commute Mode to NBC

Drive Bike/Walk Alone 9% 93%

Carpool Motorcycle 7% 8%

Vanpool Kiss N Ride 3% 1%

Transit 3%

Source: iCommute Survey Results, July 2016 Individual NBC installation existing connectivity maps can be found in the Briefing Book

Commuting Patterns Top Challenges for Naval Base Coronado

• A majority of commuters to any of the Traffic and Regional Connectivity NBC installations reside in the City of San Diego, followed by the City of • SR 75 experiences traffic congestion from both the east (from I-5) and Chula Vista, and the City of Coronado south (from Silver Strand) access corridors during peak hours • Gate queueing onto local streets • 86% of military personnel drive alone for a portion of their trip or their Mobility entire trip • No shuttle between NAB and NASNI to accommodate trips between • Commuters choose to drive alone due to the need for scheduling flexibility installations due to work tasks or military personnel living on one installation and working at the other • There are 58 registered iCommute • No shuttle between NAB and NASNI vanpools that commute to NBC • No transit access to new SSTC gate • Very few commuters bike, walk, or take transit to work Other • Limited affordable housing options in nearby communities

Additional challenges can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A)

Mobility Report Card Data current as of December 2018 Naval Base Coronado Supportive Programs/Infrastructure Mobility Options On Base City of Coronado City of Imperial Beach

• NASNI - Activity centers • Substantial sidewalks and low • Substantial sidewalks. No (e.g. hangars) are far speed limits. No sidewalks on sidewalks on Silver Strand. apart/spread out Silver Strand. • Bayshore Bikeway Walking/ • NAB, SSTC, NOLF - Activity • Bayshore Bikeway • Intermittent Class III bike routes Biking centers are • Class II bike lanes on 1st St., along local streets walkable/bikeable; 6th St., & Glorietta Blvd. • Class II bike lanes on 13th St. however, gate access and intermittent Class II bike lanes options are limited • Class III bike route on Alameda St on Palm Avenue

Public • MTS Route 901 and 904 • MTS Blue Line Trolley • No transit services on base Transit • Ferry • MTS Routes 901, 933, and 934

Microtransit • Internal shuttle on NASNI • No current service • No current service

• Vanpool subsidy with TIPS • SANDAG iCommute Carpool & Vanpool Program • No existing High Occupancy • No existing High Occupancy Vanpool • No designated parking Vehicle (HOV) lanes on SR 75 Vehicle (HOV) lanes on SR 75 spaces for carpool or vanpool

Carshare • Limited government fleet • No current programs • No current programs

• Waze Carpool On-Demand • Waze Carpool • Waze Carpool • Uber, Lyft with Security Rideshare • Uber, Lyft • Uber, Lyft Clearance

Bikeshare • Lime permitted on base • Prohibited per City policy • Lime

Electric Bike & • No current programs • Prohibited per City policy • No current programs Scootershare

Neighborhood Electric • No current programs • No current programs • No current programs Vehicle (NEV) • High supply of parking • Traffic Signal Synchronization to • Limited Electric Vehicle • Limited street parking close to base charging infrastructure base • Smart Growth Opportunity Other • Some goods • Smart Growth Opportunity Areas – Palm Avenue movement prohibited from Areas: Downtown Coronado & Seacoast Drive and Palm using Coronado Bay Bridge and Ferry Landing and instead limited to Avenue & 9th St. Silver Strand access Data current as of December 2018 The detailed installation profile can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A) Data current as of December 2018

Naval Base Point Loma

Naval Base Point Loma (NBPL) is located on the Point Loma peninsula within the City of San Diego. NBPL includes Naval Base Point Loma – Main Site/Submarine Base (Subase), Harbor Drive Annex, Old Town Complex, Taylor Street Complex, and Lindbergh Field. NBPL Subase is bordered by the community of Point Loma to the north, the San Diego Bay to the east, the Pacific Ocean to the west, and Cabrillo National Monument to the south. One major north-south corridor, the Interstate 5, and one major east-west facility, the Interstate 8, connect to major roads that provide access to the Coast Guard Station via driving, carpooling, and vanpooling. MTS Route 84 provides direct access to NBPL Subase, once in the A.M. and once in the P.M.

Commute Origin of NBPL Percent of Commute Origin Commuters City of San Diego 52% East San Diego County 19% South San Diego County 13% North San Diego County 10% Riverside County 4% Other 2% Total Responses 1,491 Source: iCommute Survey Results, January 2018

Commute Mode to NBPL

Drive Alone Bike/Walk 88% 4%

Carpool Motorcycle 5% 3%

Vanpool Work from 1% Home 7% Transit 4%

Source: iCommute Survey Results, January 2018 Naval Base Point Loma – Existing Connectivity Commuting Patterns Top Challenges for Naval Base Point Loma • Temporary lodging and bachelor units on NBPL and Harbor Drive Annex can Traffic and Regional Connectivity accommodate up to 1,700 military and • Rosecrans Street traffic signals are not synchronized which creates civilian employees significant queuing both on and off base • A majority of commuters for NBPL reside • Congestion on I-5, I-8, Rosecrans Street, and Harbor Drive delays in the City of San Diego commuters and goods movement • The primary mode of commute for • Lack of affordable housing near the base employees to NBPL is driving alone Mobility • There are approximately 28 registered iCommute vanpools that go to NBPL • Transit trips require multiple transfers between NBPL and the Annex • Circulator shuttle was discontinued due to lack of funding and low • The use of public transportation, biking, ridership or walking as a commute mode to NBPL is minimal Additional challenges can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A)

Data current as of December 2018 Mobility Report Card Naval Base Point Loma

Existing Supportive Programs/Infrastructure Mobility Options On Base City of San Diego

Walking/ • Bike facilities along Cabrillo • Walkable Biking Monument Dr. and Rosecrans St.

Public Transit • No public transportation on base • MTS Route 84 and 923

Microtransit • No current services • No current services

• No designated carpool/vanpool • No existing High Occupancy Carpool & Vanpool spaces Vehicle lanes on I-5 and I-8

• Limited government fleet Carshare • Zipcar • No current private carshare programs

• Waze Carpool • Waze Carpool On-Demand Rideshare • Uber and Lyft with Security • Uber, Lyft Clearance

Bikeshare • No current programs • Lime

Electric Bike & • No current programs • Bird Scootershare

Neighborhood Electric • No current programs • No current programs Vehicle (NEV)

• Limited street parking close to base Other • Ample parking on base • Smart Growth Opportunity Area: Pacific Highway and San Diego Peninsula in Point Loma Data current as of December 2018 The detailed installation profile can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A).

Data current as of December 2018

Naval Base San Diego – 32nd Street Facility

Naval Base San Diego (NBSD) is comprised of the following campuses: 32nd Street Facility Naval Base, Broadway Complex in Downtown San Diego, and the Naval Medical Center San Diego Complex near Balboa Park The 32nd Street Facility is located along the San Diego Bay south of Downtown San Diego and the Barrio Logan community, and west of the City of National City. Interstate 5, Interstate 805, Interstate 15 are three major north-south corridors used to access the base via driving, carpooling, and vanpooling. State Route 54 is a major east-west connector south of the base that is also used to access the facility. The base is also accessible via the MTS Blue Line, a north-south Trolley service that runs parallel to Harbor Drive and has four stations within a mile of one or more of the base’s access gates.

Commute Origin of NBSD

Percent of Commute Origin Commuters City of San Diego 46% South San Diego County 26% East San Diego County 14% North San Diego County 6% Riverside County 6% Other* 2% Total Responses 1,943 Source: iCommute Survey Results, August 2018

Commute Mode to NBSD

Drive Bike/Walk Alone 7% 88%

Motorcycle Carpool 8% 9%

Work from Vanpool Home 4% 3%

Transit 18%

Source: iCommute Survey Results, August 2018 Naval Base San Diego-32nd Street Facility – Existing Connectivity

Commuting Patterns Top Challenges for Naval Base San Diego (32nd St)

• There are over 4,600 bachelor housing Traffic and Regional Connectivity units and 4,900 family housing units on • Congestion along Harbor Drive and freeway ramps affects access to NBSD base • At-grade rail crossings at 28th Street and 32nd Street interrupt signal • Personnel who live on base on the dry timing and coordination which contributes to congestion at adjacent side do not have the option to drive intersections which results in significant use of the pedestrian bridge south of 32nd Street Mobility • 33 registered vanpools go to NBSD, • Limited connections between NBSD wet and dry sides accounting for 4% of commuter trips • Lack of transit service within NBSD to connect work locations and ship yards • Personnel drive out of convenience and Other lack of transit service near their home • Congestion on Harbor Drive, especially at the intersection of 32nd Street • Very few commuters bike, walk, or take and Harbor Drive, impedes goods movements and causes freight traffic to transit to work due to proximity of divert onto local roads off-base housing Additional challenges can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A)

Mobility Report Card Naval Base San Diego – 32nd Street Complex

Supportive Programs/Infrastructure Mobility Options On base City of Oceanside City of National City

• Wet side is walkable • Bayshore Bikeway along Harbor • Bayshore Bikeway along Walking/ • Pedestrian bridges (external and Drive Harbor Drive internal) help people cross • Sidewalks on adjacent local roads Biking Harbor Drive • Sidewalks on adjacent • Removing pedestrian bridges local roads • Sharrows

• Pacific Fleet Station - Trolley Only • Harborside Station - Trolley Only • 24th Street Transit Center – Trolley & local bus Public • No public transportation exists • MTS Route 929 provides direct access to base border routes Transit on base • MTS Routes 932, 955, 962, 963 • 8th Street Transit Center - travel through the city and stop at Trolley & local bus routes 8th Street Transit Center

• AV Shuttle Pilot Microtransit • No current programs • No current programs • Internal Shuttle on wet side

• 5% carpool, 8% vanpool • Limited parking at Trolley • Limited parking at Trolley Carpool & • Designated carpool and Stations/Transit Centers Stations/Transit Centers Vanpool vanpool reserved parking spaces • No HOV lanes on freeways leading • No HOV lanes on on-base to base freeways leading to base

• Limited government fleet Carshare • Zipcar • No current programs • No current carshare partnerships

• Waze Carpool On-Demand • Waze Carpool, Uber, Lyft • Waze Carpool, Uber, Lyft Rideshare • Uber and Lyft with Security Clearance

Bikeshare • Lime Pilot • Lime, Discover Bike, JUMP • Lime

Electric Bike & • Lime Pilot • Bird, Razor, Lime, Wheels, Wind • Lime Scootershare

Neighborhood Electric • No current partnerships • Circuit, formerly known as FRED • No current programs Vehicle (NEV) • Limited street parking • Removing parking on wet side close to base for pier security clearance • Limited street parking close to base • Limited parking at trolley • Parking lots on wet side • Freight Signal Priority Pilot stations Other repurposes to shipping • Smart Growth workspace areas • Smart Growth Opportunity Areas: Barrio Logan Opportunity Areas: • No parking for contractors on Downtown National City, base Plaza Boulevard, and 8th Street Data current as of December 2018 The detailed installation profile can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A). Data current as of December 2018

Naval Base San Diego – Broadway Complex

Naval Base San Diego (NBSD) is comprised of the following campuses: 32nd Street Facility Naval Base, Broadway Complex in Downtown San Diego, and the Naval Medical Center San Diego Complex near Balboa Park. The Broadway Complex is bordered by the San Diego Bay and Harbor Drive to the west, Broadway to the north, Pacific Highway to the east, and W Harbor Drive to the South. The Interstate 5, Interstate 15, and State Route 163 are three major north-south freeways and State Route 94 is a major east-west freeway for driving, carpooling, and vanpooling to the base. The Santa Fe Depot, located a half-mile from the facility, is served by Amtrak and NCTD’s COASTER. Additionally, there are several MTS bus stops and trolley stations that connect the facility to the region. The Broadway Complex benefits from the higher concentration of transit, micro-mobility, and supportive infrastructure (bike lanes, wide sidewalks) downtown.

Commute Origin of NBSD – Broadway

Complex

Percent of Commute Origin Commuters City of San Diego 53% South San Diego County 18% East San Diego County 16% North San Diego County 9% Riverside County 2% Total Responses 130 Commute Mode to NBSD – Broadway

Complex

Drive Bike/Walk Alone 4% 85% Carpool Motorcycle 6% 3%

Vanpool Work from 2% Home 8% Transit 22%

Source: iCommute Survey Results, June 2016 Naval Base San Diego-Broadway Complex – Existing Connectivity Commuting Patterns Top Challenges for NBSD (Broadway Complex) • Employees of Broadway Complex primarily live in the cities of San Diego and Chula Vista Traffic and Regional Connectivity • Small distribution of employees living in Riverside County • No carpool lanes on SR-163 or SR 94 and Orange County Mobility • The primary mode of commute mode for employees is driving alone • No designated carpool/vanpool spaces on base and these programs don’t align with variable work schedules • There are only seven registered vanpools that go to the Broadway Complex, and few travel by this option Other • Many commuters bike, walk, take the train, or take • Parking constraints on base due to construction of a new transit to work development • The facility is successfully encouraging alternative

commute options for employees due to the loss of on-facility parking areas Additional challenges can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A)

Data current as of December 2018 Mobility Report Card Naval Base San Diego Broadway Complex

Supportive Programs/Infrastructure Mobility Options On Base City of San Diego

• Sidewalks on adjacent local roads Walking/ • Bike facilities along Harbor Drive, • Base small and walkable Biking Broadway, and Pacific Highway

• Bayshore Bikeway adjacent to base

• MTS Route 932, 992, 280, and 290 • Seaport Village Trolley Station • America Plaza Trolley Station • Multiple transit routes adjacent to Public Transit the facility • Santa Fe Depot • Ferry Terminal located adjacent to base, connect Downtown San Diego to Coronado

Microtransit • No shuttle service within base • No current programs

• 6% carpool / 2% vanpool Carpool & Vanpool • No designated carpool / vanpool • No current programs spaces • Limited Government Fleet Carshare • No Current Private Carshare • Zipcar Programs • Waze Carpool • Waze Carpool, Uber, UberPool, Lyft, On-Demand Rideshare • Uber and Lyft with Security LyftLine Express Clearance

Bikeshare • Lime Pilot • Lime, Discover Bike, JUMP

Electric Bike & • Lime Pilot • Bird, Razor, Lime, Wheels, Wind Scootershare

Neighborhood • No Current Partnerships • Circuit, formerly known as FRED Electric Vehicle (NEV)

• Limited street parking close to base • Removing parking on base, • Privately owned parking lots in Other relocating parking to lot east of the Downtown 8th Transit Center • Smart Growth Opportunity Area: Centre City/Downtown Data current as of December 2018 The detailed installation profile can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A).

Data current as of December 2018

U.S. Coast Guard Station

The U.S. Coast Guard Station is located in the City of San Diego, along the San Diego Bay, adjacent to Harbor Drive and the San Diego International Airport. The facility is adjacent to the Downtown community, the Port of San Diego and San Diego Airport Authority Jurisdictions. One major north-south corridor, the Interstate 5, and one major east-west facility, the Interstate 8, connect to major roads that provide access to the Coast Guard Station via driving, carpooling, and vanpooling. The installation is located approximately one mile away from the Middletown Trolley Station and is accessible via MTS Routes 923 and 992 along North Harbor Drive. Commute Origin of U.S. Coast Guard

Station Percent of Commute Origin Commuters Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton City of San Diego 56% South San Diego Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (Camp Pendleton) is located in North San Diego County, neighbored by the City of Oceanside County 15% to the South, the community of Fallbrook to the east, and Orange County to the north. Camp Pendleton experiences an average East San Diego County 13% daytime population of 70,000 employees, military family members, and visitors. There are two north-south corridors, the Interstate North San Diego 5 and 15, and one major east-west facility, State Route 76, that provide access to Camp PendletonCounty via driving, carpooling,6% and vanpooling. The installation is located two miles north of the Oceanside Transit Center (OTC) where commuters can utilize the Riverside County 6% Amtrak, Metrolink, NCTD COASTER, and NCTD SPRINTER. Other 2% Total Responses 142 Source: iCommute Survey Results, January 2017

Drive Bike/Walk Alone 14% 93%

Carpool Motorcycle 7% 11%

Vanpool Work from 2% Home 2% Transit 2%

Source: iCommute Survey Results, January 2017 U.S. Coast Guard Station – Existing Connectivity Commuting Patterns Top Challenges for U.S. Coast Guard Station • Military personnel mostly commute Traffic and Regional Connectivity from City of San Diego communities • Junior personnel are commonly housed • Congestion along Harbor Drive associated with the San Diego in the closer communities of Point International Airport and its planned expansion affects access to Loma and Pacific Beach U.S. Coast Guard Station and delays freight movement through the corridor • Coast Guard personnel commute from military housing communities Other throughout the region including Temecula, Alpine, and Chula Vista • Lack of on-base housing • In 2017, 85% of Coast Guard • Lack of easily accessible and nearby housing personnel commuted by driving alone • Multiple stakeholders and agencies share the Harbor Drive to work corridor and have invested interests for the proposed and planned projects • The Coast Guard facility is expected to double its workforce over the next Additional challenges can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A) 20 years

Data current as of December 2018 Mobility Report Card U.S. Coast Guard

Supportive Programs/Infrastructure Mobility Options On Base City of San Diego

• Class I multiuse path on North Harbor Dr. • No westbound bike facilities on Laurel Walking/ Street or North Harbor Dr. • Walkable Biking • Mix of Class II and Class III bike facility

networks in Uptown/Downtown communities

Public Transit • No transit services on base • MTS Route 923 and 992

Microtransit • No current programs • No current services

• Vanpool subsidy with TIPS • No existing High Occupancy Carpool & Vanpool • SANDAG iCommute Vanpool Vehicle lanes on I-5 and I-8 Program

Carshare • No current programs • Zipcar

• Waze Carpool Pilot • Waze Carpool On-Demand Rideshare • Uber, Lyft • Uber, Lyft

Bikeshare • No current programs • Lime, Discover Bike

• Electric bike: Lime, JUMP Electric Bike & • No current programs Scootershare • Electric scooter: Lime, Bird, Razor, Wheels, Wind

Neighborhood Electric • No current programs • Circuit, formerly known as FRED Vehicle (NEV)

• Limited street parking close to base Other • Limited parking on base • Smart growth opportunity areas: Midway-Pacific Highway and San Diego Peninsula in Point Loma Data current as of December 2018 The detailed installation profile can be found in the Briefing Book (Appendix A).

Appendix J

Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between U.S. Department of Defense and the SANDAG Board of Directors (2017)

APPENDIX J FINAL REPORT October 2019 | Draft