DOCSLIB.ORG

Broadway Complex San Diego, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Broadway Complex San Diego, California DCN: 7336 Commissioner's Base Briefing Book Navy Broadway Complex San Diego, California Chairman Principi and Commissioners Coyle, Hansen, & Bilbray 5 August 2005 NAVY BROAIIWAY COMPLEX, SAN DIEGO, CA CHAIRMAN AND COMMISIONERS' BASE VISIT 5 AUG 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB A. ITINERARY B. BASE SUMMARY SHEET C. INSTALLATION REVIEW D. STATE MAP AND STATISTICAL DATA E. STATE CLOSURE HISTORY LIST F. PRESS ARTICLES AND CORRESPONDENCE G. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Base Visit Itinerary Navy Broadway Complex, San Diego, California August 4-5,2005 - - p~~- DATEITIME EVENT LOCATION POC ACTION Thursday 4 Aug 05 Commission Staff Navy Broadway LCDR Michael Pre-visit Complex, Tasker, Navy 937 North Harbor Region Southwest Dr., San Diego (619) 571-3381 cell Thursday 4 Aug 05 Commissioner Ornni San Diego Brian McDaniel Bilbray Arrives in Hotel Sr. Staff Analyst San Diego, CA 675 L St. 202-64 1-6406 or San Diego, CA 703-861-1 159 cell 6 19-231 -6664 Jason Cole Advance Team 703-90 1-7768 cell Friday 5 Aug 05 Commissioner San Diego Int. Jason Cole Mr. McDaniel 9:19 AM Hansen Arrives in Airport (SAN) 703-90 1-7768 cell will meet San Diego, CA Delta Flt. 3787 Commissioner from SLC and drive him to Navy Broadway Complex Friday 5 Aug 05 Commissioner Coyle San Diego Int. Jason Cole Mr. McDaniel 10:25 AM Arrives in San Airport (SAN) 703-901 -7768 cell will meet Diego, CA UA Flt. 6 162 Commissioner from LAX and drive him to Navy Broadway Complex Friday 5 Aug 05 Chairman Principi San Diego Int. Brian McDaniel Mr. McDaniel 11:09 AM Arrives in Airport (SAN) Staff Analyst picks-up the San Diego, CA. UA Flt. 021 1 202-641 -6406 or Chairman and from IAD 703-861 -1 159 cells drives him to Navy Broadway Complex. Staff transports Navy Broadway Brian McDaniel Mr. McDaniel Chairman & Complex, and Jason Cole briefs Chairman Commissioners tlo 937 North Harbor & HQ Navy Region Dr., San Diego Commissioners Southwest on staff visit and findings. Arrive Navy Navy Region LCDR Michael RADM Hering Broadway Complex Southwest HQ Tasker, Navy and RADM Lobby Region Southwest Betancourt greet 937 North (619) 571-3381 cell Chairman and Harbor Dr. Commissioners Working Lunch and Navy Region Navy Briefer: RADM Command Brief Southwest HQ RADM Betancourt Betancourt 5" F1. Business Former presents Navy tenants Office Conf Commander, Navy command brief attending: Navy Room Region Southwest Region Southwest, NAVFAC EFD LCDR Michael Southwest, and Tasker, Navy San Diego Fleet Region Southwest Industrial & Supply (619) 571-3381 cell Ctr. Congresswoman Davis & staffers,from Sen. Feinstein, R'ep. Hunter, and Rep. Cunningham's ofice in attendance Chairman & Navy Region Meeting - Commissioner Southwest HQ Commission follow-on meeting Commanding and Navy with RADM Officer's Office Principals only Herring Commission Media Off base - NRSW San Diego Press Availability Outside USS PAO, Capt. Jacqui Conference Midway Museum Yost 61 9-532-1436 (Navy Pier across street from Navy Robert McCreary Broadway Dep. Dir.Com Complex) Office 703-901-7835 cell Chairman & Brian McDaniel Commissioners Sr. Staff Analyst Depart Navy 202-641-6406 or Broadway Complex 703-861-1 159 cell Jason Cole 703-901-7768 cell Commissioner Coyle San Diego Int. Brian McDaniel Departs San Diego, Airport (SAN) Staff Analyst CA UA Flt. 6 156 202-64 1-6406 Jason Cole 703-90 1-7768 Commissioner San Diego Int. Brian McDaniel Hansen Departs San Airport (SAN) Staff Analyst Diego, CA Delta Flt. 1035 202-64 1-6406 DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION I * B,4SE SUMMARY SHEET (Navy Broadway Complex, San Diego, CA) INSTALLATION MISSION Annex to Naval Station San Diego provides headquarters and office space primarily for the Navy Region Southwest Headquarters, the: San Diego Fleet Industrial and Supply Center, and the Navy Readiness Command Southwest Headquarters. DOD BRAC RECOMMENDATIONS None DOD JUSTIFICATION None DOD COST CONSIDERATIONS None ACTION UNDER CONSIDERATION Close Broadway complex (approx. 14 acres) and relocate existing Navy tenants to other Naval Activities in San Diegrs such as the Naval Station San Diego. JUSTIFICATION Closing the Navy's Broadway complex in San Diego, CA, will reduce excess property or space, enhance security and force protection, and consolidate "support" and headquarters functions with Navy operational cust:omers. Beginning in 1987, DON has been planning to dispose of the Broadway property and use the proceeds or other consideration to build new ofice space on an existing "full-service" base in San Diego and finance other infrastructure needs, depending on property's final market value and market timing of disposal. MANPOWER IMPLICATIONS OF THIS RECOMMENDATION (EXCLUDES CONTRACTORS) Military Civilian Contractors Baseline 142 827 50 Job Eliminated 0 0 0 Jobs Relocated* 142 827 Total (net) (142) (827) (50) Total Post BRAC 0 0 0 * Assumes Navy would retain jobs in same MSNROI. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS There are no known environmental impediments to implementation of this recommendation. REPRESENTATION Governor: Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) Senators: Diane Feinstein (D) -- 5thTerm (66% of the vote last election) Barbara Boxer (D) -5th Term (85% of the vote last election) Representative: Ann Davis (ID-53rdDistrict) - 2nd Term (64% of the vote last election) (Member HASC) ECONOMIC IMPACT Potential Employment Loss: None* MSA Job Base: l,8O6,32 1 Percentage: NA 1 * Assumes Navy would retain jobs in same MSNROI. Irr MILITARY ISSUES Navy retains 100% of disposal proceeds and controls reinvestment decisions Asset disposition process selected should maximize Navy's potential financial returnlproceeds Proceeds needed to finance replacement office space for tenants Disposal process authorized by ENAC law may diminish property value and resulting financial return to may COMMUNITY CONCERNS/ISSIJES Community should decide how best to re-use property Any reuse should abide by existing development agreement between City and Navy Property is ripe for commercial redevelopment Supports proceeds benefiting Nzvy in San Diego ITEMS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS None & Brian A. McDaniel / Sr. Analyst / Navy Marine Corps R&A Team / August 3,2005 Close: I Navy Broadway Complex San Diego, CA (approx. 14 acres located in downtown San Diego adjacent to the waterfront). .-Mi2 Gain at: Naval Station San Diego, CA. Reauirements: None Associated DoD Recommendations: hF None I DoD Response: All activities/functions located at Broadway Complex e\rlu~.adby Navy or one of the Joint Cross-Service Groups. Navy BRAC analysis did not develop a recommendation to close Broadway because none of the activities were recommended for 3 relocation. II = Disposition of Broadway Co lm pl better addre BRAC process. GAO Comment: None 2. Navy Broadway Complex San Diego, CA, Action under Consideration: Close Navy Broadway Complex, San Di Relocate Navy activities into exceIesadministrative space on more secure Navy installations in San Dieg MAH Capacity Analysis USN Capaclty Ins1 M8xlmum Current Usage Capacity k~city Potential @ 200 Avallabk to Roqulred lnstallatlon Curnnt Capacity Capaclty OSFPenon Surge to Surge %Excess (Shortfall) Naval Research Laboratory 198878 21 8654 101200 117454 0 54% 1 17454 Naval Stat~onand Undersea Warfare Center Newport 37301 3 373013 288320 84693 0 23% 84693 Naval Station Everett 76502 89601 228400 -1 38799 0 ---1 55% -1 38799 Naval Station Norfolk 1074164 2160728 1806800 353928 3980 16% 349m8 Naval Stat~onPearl Harbor 1675766 1905109 1277400 627709 1500 33% 626209 Naval Stat~onSan Diego 1265271 1364733 943800 420933 4500 31 % 41 6433 Naval Submarme Base Bangor 447424 450900 922900 -472000 0 -105% -472000 Naval Submarme Support Base Kmgs Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg 1138015 272291 1 1025600 1697311 0 62% 1697311 Naval Support Activity Millington 1295107 1454666 977400 477266 5000 32 % 472266 INaval SUDDO~Aclivitv New Orleans. LA I 8185771 8185771 5458001 2727771 1700I 33% 1 271077 I ~~u~ot?ActivityNorfolk 724685 71 5700 1224200 -508500 302 -71% -508802 Naval Weapons Station Charleston 297324 61 2030 396000 2 16030 400 35% 2 15630 NAVSTA. -. - - . .ANNAPOLIS .. .. .. .. - - . - L 431 329 456485~ ~ 175800 280685 0 61~. % 280685 NAVSUPPACTDAHLGREN 1 2072551 2080251 1292001 788251 0i 38% 1 78825 NAVSUPPACT- - INDIAN HEAD 24 1931 3999531 2328001 1671531 01 42% 167153 I 1 4 7 IPotomac Annex. Washinaton- DC i -1739001 I I 3600 33200 80400 0 4 6O/o 80400 Saufley Field 1 3984671 403580 192200 21 1380 0 52% 21 1380 Washmgton Navy Yard 49737281 5008356 3270200 1738156 1200 35%1 1736956 DRAFT DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT-FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY-DONOT RELEASE UNDER FOlA DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1 0 1 0 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 2030 1 - 1010 JUL 1 4 203 The Honorable Anthony J. Principi Chairman Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission 2521 South Clark Street, Suite 600 Arlington, VA 22202 Dear Chairman Principi, In your letter of July 1,2005, you asked for the Department's comments on a number of installations in advance of the Commission's voting at your hearing on July 19,2005, to consider these installations for closure or realignment analysis. Your July 12,2005 letter requested witnesses to address the Commission's concern regarding recommendations impacting the Air National Guard. The Commission's independent assessment of the Department's recommendations and the subsequent reviews by the President and the Congress are each important steps to ensure that the final recommendations are fair, consistent with the selection criteria and force structure plan and will, in fact, increase the efficiency and effectiveness of our military infrastructure. As such, while the Department stands behind its recommendations, it hlly supports the Commission's analysis of alternatives. As you undertake your review, please consider that each of the Department's recommendations is part' of a comprehensive, integrated, and interdependent package. The recommendations submitted by the Department of Defense strengthen national security by reshaping the domestic installations at which U.S. military forces and their associated support.elements perform their assigned missions. The Military Departments and Joint Cross-Service Groups have provided the attached responses to the issues you raise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Raiders and Ruins
    Raiders and Ruins By Nathan-–Patches-Reed Credits Author: Nathan Reed Publisher: Editor: Sarah Lyon Art Director: Nathan Reed Graphic Designer: Nathan Reed Layout: Nathan Reed Cover Artist: Tamas Baranya Cover Designer: Nathan Reed Interior Artists: Tamas Baranya, Don Davis, Nathan Reed, James P. Blair Diagrams: Fonts: Boycott, Arial Indexes: Nathan Reed Proofreaders: John Michael Scott, Challon Winer Miniatures in Photos: www.Brother-Vinni.com, Artizan Designs, Armorcast, WorldWorks, Reaper Miniatures, Games-Workshop. Raiders and Ruins This game references the Savage Worlds game system, available from Pinnacle Entertainment Group at www.peginc.com. Savage Worlds and all associated logos and trademarks are copyrights of Pinnacle Entertainment Group. Used with permission. Pinnacle makes no representation or warranty as to the quality, viability, or suitability for purpose of this product. Licensee indemnifies Licensor, other licensees of the Property, their officers, employees, agents, licensees, and assigns, and holds them harmless against all loss, damage, injury, and expense, including reasonable attorney’s fees, from any breach of this Agreement. 1) The licensee agrees not to reproduce material from the Savage Worlds rulebook or any other copyrighted work without the express written consent of Pinnacle Entertainment Group or the copyright holder. 2) Pinnacle Entertainment Group reserves all intellectual property rights to Savage Worlds, including, but not limited to, all copyrights, trademarks, hobby game, publishing, entertainment, licensing and merchandising rights. 3) Pinnacle Entertainment Group reserves all rights to its Intellectual Properties, including those used as examples or illustrations in the Savage Worlds rule book, promotional material, or published works. 4) This licensee agrees not to charge for the product in any way, shape, or form.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 15 Dog Friendly Hotels in San Diego | Boutique Travel Blog
    Top 15 dog friendly hotels in San Diego | Boutique Travel Blog HOME DESTINATIONS BEAUTIFUL PLACES TRAVEL SNOBS COOL HOTELS https://globalgrasshopper.com/travel/top-15-dog-friendly-hotels-in-san-diego/[5/7/2019 3:45:47 PM] Top 15 dog friendly hotels in San Diego | Boutique Travel Blog DOG FRIENDLY TRAVEL, TRAVEL Top 15 dog friendly hotels in San Diego Becky Moore / 3 September At the southernmost tip of California and on the Pacific coastline, it’s all about the ocean and outdoor pursuits in San Diego. Its laid-back, outdoorsy vibe is apparent from its surf-loving, climate caring locals who protect and enjoy their natural surroundings. The surf’s always up for humans and pooches with doggy lessons available for regular surfing and stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) tours that take you gliding under North Harbor Bridge and past other key sites of San Diego. San Diego is well set up for a break with your four-legged friend and is one of the most dog-friendly cities in America. Spend the day on Fiesta Island – an off-leash dog-friendly park and beach within Mission Bay or stroll around one of the many local pooch permitting parks including famous Balboa Park with designated leash-free areas. There’s even a dog bakery not too far from Balboa Park serving preservative and lactose-free doggy cakes. If you fancy some retail therapy then head to Westfield UTC which is a pet-friendly open-air shopping centre and enjoy dinner and harbor views with your faithful friend at Seaport Village at one of the dog-friendly restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • Base Structure Report: Fiscal Year 2004 Baseline
    DCN: 10365 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE STRUCTURE REPORT (A Summary of DoD's Real Property Inventory) FISCAL YEAR 2004 BASELINE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INSTALLATIONS & ENVIRONMENT) Department of Defense Base Structure Report (BSR) I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. DoD-2 II. PORTFOLIO SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. DoD-2 III. CONTENT AND ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................................... DoD-6 IV. DATA SOURCES AND DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................................ DoD-7 V. SUMMARY OF CHANGES ............................................................................................................................................... DoD-9 VI. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................................................... DoD-9 VII. INSTALLATION SUMMARIES..................................................................................................................................... DoD-11 VIII. TOTAL DOD INVENTORY............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • La-Valencia-Guide-Ed1.Pdf
    YOUR GUIDE TO LA JOLLA LA TO GUIDE YOUR ALENCIA HOTEL AND SPA LA JOLLA, CA E Y A V T W . A T 2 H M I Y E AM I W A Y S S T S E K T S S S E N M E Z Z E O V NN T U E C A C W S M C P Y A N L I V . D V I R O E R D A A E T B D E N N R V R E E A W C N N K N R O S B V D L V V R T A Y C E A U N T V S E S I A L A A E D N E W E O E T F D A E P E S O D L E R I B Y C V O F O . T C I R S D P L A V I M L V E V A E E H A T S Y S S S VE O E H N O E A R A D L H C A V L A Park W I C A A L A ST D M AV AY Y W . UT E C A Y A W D D E OO P G U N PO F M D E O N N S E V E A A D V E R S E A K R E A V N Nobel B F A IS L E S D O Clairemont N R C O DO E ST N A A A R M R D E B T A E E Y Park L G N D T N A U R T A G S B O E C D CO T S V E L O A C C F A O ST E R COLE L C L A I R R S A E M T D Tecolote I R E M O N T D R O N T WA GE E S Athletic Area N K R I O T E A T S O H K A V T O T S S C O D O E C M A T A T W O O A T T R W N T B D T S O RN S DA O L T E E E I Canyon Natural Y S O R V E AY T M H A D V T O A K T D V O GALT A A W DI S R N L I R E WA D E S R E O H C Z T E C S T E H A D D R GO LO T E E LA E YA A CT E T V E AV E E S V N A F N T I AY T RA L R L DU X A W T D N R A A E W A V E E R O R T G E W H D O V S T A N E S A F R E T A N A U M N I L E Y P E ND T O TO M E E O E T O H V A AV F A A R K D ON L R M S LE C D B T Y P ST T L L M E S CONRAD A T I T L R E E E R M U I E S N V L E PP I N OR N E Y AVE D E F R O A R R W R T C P O O A V C A I E I Y A G EA R E E A N R M D E S EN E B A N I E G A A E AM V E M N R T L B C T IP L A I TO A I N E I E A E O C A S A Z S P S E
    [Show full text]
  • USS Midway Museum Historic Gaslamp Quarter Balboa Park
    Approx. 22 Miles Approx. 28 Miles San Diego Zoo Del Mar Legoland Fairgrounds Safari Park Del Mar Beaches DOG FRIENDLY 56 North Beach 5 Torrey Pines State Natural Reserve Hiking Torrey Pines Golf Course 805 Torrey Pines Gliderport University of California San Diego Birch Aquarium at Scripps Westfield UTC Mall La Jolla Shores La Jolla Cove 52 Village of La Jolla SeaWorld USS Midway Historic Gaslamp Balboa Park & Museum Quarter San Diego Zoo Approx. 12 Miles Approx. 15 Miles Approx. 16 Miles Approx. 16 Miles Fun Things To Do Within Walking Distance Torrey Pines Golf Course (0.5 mi) – Perfect your swing at the world renowned Torrey Pines Golf Course, home to two 18-hole championship courses. This public course has a driving range and is open every day until 30 minutes before dusk. Call our Golf Team at 1-800-991-GOLF (4653) to book your tee time. Torrey Pines State Natural Reserve (0.8 mi) – Hike a trail in this beautiful 2,000-acre coastal state park overlooking the Pacific Ocean. Some trails lead directly to Torrey Pines State Beach. Trail maps available at our Concierge Desk. Torrey Pines Gliderport (1.5 mi) – Visit North America's top paragliding and hang gliding location and try an instructional tandem flight. Please call ahead since all flights are dependent on the wind conditions - (858) 452-9858. Fun Things To Do Just a Short Drive Away La Jolla Playhouse (2 mi) – A not-for-profit, professional theatre at the University of California San Diego. See Concierge for current showings. Birch Aquarium (3 mi) – Experience stunning sea life at Birch Aquarium at Scripps Institute of Oceanography.
    [Show full text]
  • California Rare & Endagered Birds
    California brown pelican Pelecanus occidentalis californicus State Endangered 1971 Fully Protected Federal Endangered 1970 General Habitat: The California brown pelican uses a variety of natural and human-created sites, including offshore islands and rocks, sand spits, sand bars, jetties, and piers, for daytime loafing and nocturnal roosting. Preferred nesting sites provide protection from mammalian predators and sufficient elevation to prevent flooding of nests. The pelican builds a nest of sticks on the ground, typically on islands or offshore rocks. Their nesting range extends from West Anacapa Island and Santa Barbara Island in Channel Islands National Park to Islas Los Coronados, immediately south of and offshore from San Diego, and Isla San Martín in Baja California Norte, Mexico. Description: The brown pelican is one of two species of pelican in North America; the other is the white pelican. The California brown pelican is a large, grayish-brown bird with a long, pouched bill. The adult has a white head and dark body, but immature birds are dark with a white belly. The brown pelican weighs up to eight pounds and may have a wingspan of seven feet. Brown pelicans dive from flight to capture surface-schooling marine fishes. Status: The California brown pelican currently nests on West Anacapa Island and Santa Barbara Island in Channel Islands National Park. West Anacapa Island is the largest breeding population of California. In Mexico, the pelicans nest on Islas Los Coronados and Isla San Martín. Historically, the brown pelican colony on Islas Los Coronados was as large as, or larger than, that of recent years on Anacapa Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton Wetland Restoration Project
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation March 8, 2007 HAMILTON WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN File No. 94-003 Project Manager: Tom Gandesbery RECOMMENDED ACTION: Consideration and possible Conservancy authorization to accept title to the 18.37 acre Navy property in a no-cost public benefit transfer for purposes of the Hamilton Wetland Restoration Plan LOCATION: Novato, Marin County PROGRAM CATEGORY: San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy; Resource Enhancement EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location, Site and Parcel Maps (3) Exhibit 2: USFWS letter in support of no-cost transfer Exhibit 3: Finding of Suitability for Transfer, Department of the Navy Exhibit 4: Determination of No Further Action - DTSC and RWQCB RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following Resolution pursuant to Division 21 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes the acceptance of fee title to the Navy “Ballfields” property adjacent to the Hamilton Army Airfield as a no-cost public discount benefit transfer from the United States Department of the Navy, on the terms and conditions described in the accompanying staff recommendation. This authorization is subject to approval by the Director of General Services pursuant to Government Code Section 11005 and all other relevant provisions of law.” Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: “Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal Conservancy hereby finds that acceptance of title
    [Show full text]
  • MILITARY MULTIMODAL ACCESS STRATEGY Final Report
    MILITARY MULTIMODAL ACCESS STRATEGY Final Report October 2019 | DRAFT Executive Summary The San Diego region is home to the largest concentration of military assets in the world, supporting a robust ecosystem of over 384,000 active duty military personnel, civilian employees, and veterans. This "defense cluster” generates significant economic benefit for the region, but also adds considerable demand on the transportation network, particularly near military facilities. Finding solutions has been difficult due in part to: • Legal/Policy framework between military installations and adjacent jurisdictions • Leadership and staff turnover to maintain awareness and utilization of alternative commute programs • Location of military facilities and housing • Limited commute options that support military needs Added demand on the transportation network exacerbates traffic-related impacts in the region affecting national security, increasing greenhouse gas emissions, and impacting livability. Collaboration among stakeholders is critical to identifying solutions. To address these challenges and ensure the region can sustain and support future military growth, the Military Working Group (MWG) developed a Multimodal Military Access Strategy (Strategy). Based on the data and input collected, the Strategy aims to: • Develop a process to collaborate and prioritize transportation improvements to support both military and local needs • Identify access improvements that benefit multiple stakeholders • Develop recommendations and next steps to guide the MWG • Serve as a model for other regions to coordinate transportation solutions with the military or other employers with dispersed campuses. What’s in this document? The Project Inventory was compiled through stakeholder interviews, a literature review, a stakeholder workshop, Project Development Team (PDT) input, and the sessions with MWG.
    [Show full text]
  • Foialog FY07.Pdf
    Request ID Requester Name Organization Received Date Closed Date Request Description 07-F-0001 Connolly, Ward - 10/2/2006 10/2/2006 All records regarding the service of the 208th Engineer Combat Battalion anytime between December 7, 1941 and January 1, 1947. 07-F-0002 Slocum, Phillip - 10/2/2006 10/2/2006 Information relating to an operation at the end of the Gulf War in April of 1991 dubbed "Operation Manly Rip". 07-F-0004 Skelley, Lynne Federal Sources, 10/2/2006 - A clearly releasable copy of Sections A through J of the awarded contract, including Inc. the statement of work, for the contract awarded from solicitation number HROO11O6ROO2. 07-F-0005 Skelley, Lynne Federal Sources, 10/2/2006 10/3/2006 A copy of Section A (the cover page) for any contract awarded to date from Inc. solicitation number EFTHQ00038615002. 07-F-0006 Skelley, Lynne Federal Sources, 10/2/2006 6/29/2007 A copy of Section A (the cover page) for any contract awarded to date from Inc. solicitation number BAA0539. 07-F-0007 Skelley, Lynne Federal Sources, 10/2/2006 1/10/2007 A clearly releasable copy of Section A (the cover page) of any contract awarded to Inc. date off of solicitation number BAAO6O6. 07-F-0008 Battle, Joyce The National 10/2/2006 - All documents from March 1 through December 31, 2003 concerned with Security Archive discussions with the United Kingdom regarding 1) the establishment of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq; and 2) the legal status of the CPA. 07-F-0009 Kurtzman, Daniel Law Offices of 10/2/2006 10/11/2006 Requesting: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME I: INVENTORIES OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES ON CALIFORNIA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 Prepared by: FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Sacramento, California 95834 and JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March2000 Calirornia llisloric Miliiary Buildings and Structures Inventory, \'olume I CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... viii SERIES INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 I. I Purpose and Goals ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Closing Military Bases: National Disaster Or National Opportunity?
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1994 Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity? Brooke Danielle Wortham University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Wortham, Brooke Danielle, "Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity?" (1994). Theses (Historic Preservation). 477. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/477 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wortham, Brooke Danielle. (1994). Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity?. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/477 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity? Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wortham, Brooke Danielle. (1994). Closing Military Bases: National Disaster or National Opportunity?. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/477
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton Wetland Restoration Plan 9 1
    P Hamilton Wetland A 0 3_ Restoration Plan 0 3 8 volumeII: EIR/EIS 9 LeadAgencies: California State CoastalConservancy and U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers San FranciscoDistrict December1998 L P A 0 1 0 3 HAMILTON WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN 9 1 VOLUME I1: FINAL EIR/EIS Lead Agencies: California State Coastal Conservancy 1130 Broadway,1 lth Floor Oakland, CA94612-2530 Contact: Terri Nevins 510/286-4161 and U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers San Francisco District EnvironmentalPlanning Section 333 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2197 Contact:Eric F. Jolliffe 415/977-8543 PREPARED BY" Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. 2600 V Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95818-1914 Contact: Lisa Larrabee 916/737-3000 DECEMBER 1998 This documentshould be cited as: Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. 1998. Hamiltonwetland restoration plan, volumeII: final EIR/EIS. December. (JSA 98-033.) Sacramento, CA. Lead agencies: California State Coastal Conservancy, Oakland, CA, and U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers, EnvironmentalPlanning Section, San Francisco, CA. Tableof Contents 0 3 9 3 Summary S-1 Chapter 1. Introduction 1-1 Overviewof the Proposed Project 1-1 The Proposal 1-1 Project Sponsors 1-2 Overview of CEQAand NEPA 1-2 Scope of the EIR/EIS 1-3 Definition and Purposes of Scoping 1-3 Elements of the ScopingProcess 1-3 Frameworkof the EIR/EIS 1-5 The Next Steps in the EnvironmentalReview Process 1-5 Chapter2. Purpose of and Need for the HamiltonWetland Restoration Plan 2-1 Introduction 2-1 Needfor Tidal Habitat Restoration in San Francisco Bay 2-1 Project Purposes 2-1 Project Goal and Objectives 2-2 Relationship to Other Projects and Plans 2-3 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1988 2-3 City of NovatoGeneral Plan 2-4 The San Francisco Bay Plan 2-4 San Francisco Estuary Baylands EcosystemGoals Project 2-4 San Francisco Estuary Project ComprehensiveConservation and ManagementPlan 2-5 Long-TermManagement Strategy for Disposal of Dredged Sediments in San Francisco Bay 2-5 EcosystemRestoration Program Plan 2-6 Oakland Harbor Navigation Improvement(50-Foot) Project 2-6 Chapter3.
    [Show full text]