DOCSLIB.ORG

Jaw and Orofacial Motor Representation in Cat Orbital Gyrus 593

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jaw and Orofacial Motor Representation in Cat Orbital Gyrus 593 Jpn. J. Oral Biol., 33: 592-599, 1991. ORIGINAL Jaw and orofacial motor representation in cat orbital gyrus Yoshiyuki Tsuboi, Koichi Iwata, Hiroyuki Muramatsu, Junichi Yagi, Yuji Inomata, Reo Kikuta, Keiji Yoshii and Rhyuji Sumino Department of Physiology, Nihon University. School of Dentistry, 1-8-13 Kandasurugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101, Japan (Director: Prof. Rhyuji Sumino) Accepted for publication: June•k 20, 1991•l Key words: motor effect/trigeminal nerve/orbital gyrus/ICMS/cat Abstract: Jaw and orofacial motor representation in the orbital cortex was studied by intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in lightly anesthetized cats. ICMS of the posterior portion of the the orbital gyrus produced movements of facial muscles, whereas stimulation of the anterior portion of the orbital gyrus produced more generalized movement of facial, jaw and tongue muscles. The region producing jaw movements was more restricted than the regions producing tongue and facial movements. Repe- titive stimulation of the anterior orbital gyrus produced either rhythmic jaw movements or sustained jaw opening. Cytoarchitectonically, the posterior portion of the orbital gyrus was restricted to area 43 and the anterior portion to areas 43 and 6 aƒÀ. present study, the function of the orbital gyrus Introduction was studied by detailed topographic mapping The orbital cortex in the cat has been ter- of the effects produced by ICMS and the med the cortical masticatory area because results correlated with the cytoarchitectonic criteria of Hassler and Muhs-Clement7). repetitive stimulation of its anterior part pro- duces rhythmic jaw and tongue move- Materials and Methods ments1-3). The axons of cells in this cortical region may project to a "pattern generator" Experiments were performed on 16 cats in the rhythmic generation of masticatory anesthetized initially with Ketamine HCL (50 jaw movements2,4). However, it was shown mg/kg i. m.). During surgery, anesthesia that intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of was maintained with a mixture of halothane, the same area produced not only movements nitrous oxide, and oxygen and anesthetic level of the jaw and tongue but also of the facial was maintained throughout the experiment muscles suggesting that the orbital cortex of by intramuscular infusion of Ketamine HCl the cat was involved in both orofacial and (20 mg/kg/h). Additionally, incision sites masticatory motor function5). Earlier stud- were infiltrated with a 2% lidocaine HCl es1-3,6) did not determine the most effectivei solution. Heart rate was continually mon- sites which evoked jaw and orofacial move- itored by recordings of EKG. Gas anesthesia. ments because the stimulation electrodes were was discontinued after the surgery. Anes- placed on the surface of the cortex. In the thetic level was judged by miosis, animal's Y. Tsuboi et al.: Jaw and orofacial motor representation in cat orbital gyrus 593 movement and heart rate. When animal's appropriate. EMG activities of each muscle pupil quickly responded to light presentation and minimum latencies to contraction were or animal made gross non-reflexive move- determined by using suprathreshold current to ment or the heart beat rate was changed evoke an EMG response. When jaw and during electrical stimulation of the cortex , tongue muscle contractions were elicited, re- additional ketamine HC1 (20 mg/kg) was in- petitive stimulation at a frequency of 30 Hz jected i. m. Body temperature was continu- (stimulus current less than 30 ƒÊA, 0.2 ms pulse ously monitored with a rectal probe and main- width) was applied to see if it produced sus- tained between 37•Ž and 39•Ž with a heat- tained jaw opening or rhythmic jaw move- inguAd. The animal's head was fixed rigidly ment. Jaw and orofacial muscle contractions to a head-holder by means of skull screws were analyzed and lesions were placed in and dental acrylic cement. The left eyeball selected penetrations at the end of each ex- and the marginal region of the maxillary periment byuAssing direct current (10 ƒÊA, 10 s) bone were removed to give access for the through the electrodes to facilitate histolo- electrodes to the orbital cortex. The skull gical examination. over the coronal and orbital gyri was re- moved and an acrylic resin chamber was insta- Results lled over the opening. The cisterna magna was then opened to allow cerebrospinal fluid 1. Cortical representation of the jaw and to drain away and to prevent swelling of the orofacial motor zones brain. The acrylic chamber was filled with Fig. 1 shows sample penetration tracks from mineral oil after removing the dura from the one cat in which movements of jaw, tongue orbital and coronal gyri. Electrode penetra- and face were produced by ICMS of less than tions were placed 0.5 mm or less auArt in the 30 ƒÊA (Eyelid lowering was analyzed only orbital cortex and were made into the orbital on the contralateral side because the left eye- gyrus and cortical area extending to the pre- ball had been removed for installation of the sylvian sulcus. Each penetration was made acrylic chamber). ICMS delivered to the an- as near perpendicular to the cortical surface terioruArt of the orbital gyrus evoked eyelid as possible and was observed through a mi- lowering, movements of vibrissae, lower lip, croscope and photographed. jaw and tongue, whereas only eyelid lowering Each grass-coated tungsten microelectrode was observed after ICMS of the posterior (10-20 pm of tip diameter) was advanced rt (Fig. 1 B and C). Thus the uAanterior through the cortex in 200 pm steps and ICMS portion of the orbital gyrus was termed the "jaw (twelve 0.2 ms cathodal pulses,<30 ƒÊA, 300 , tongue and facial motor zone" (Fig. 1 Hz with 40 ms train duration) applied after Ca) and the posterior portion, the "facial each step, according to Asanuma's tech- motor zone" (Fig. 1 Cb). Stimulation of niques8,9). We accumulated the effective points the posterior portion of the orbital gyrus (tracks activated by ICMS of less than 30 ƒÊA, on 9 and 10) produced eyelid lowering. In the basis of Sessle and Wiesendanger's cri- addition to eyelid lowering, movements of the teria16). They have shown that ICMS of less vibrissae and lower lip were evoked from than 30 ƒÊA upper limit defines an excitable tracks 7 and 8. Movement of facial muscles region of the limb motor cortex, which con- and jaw opening were produced from stimula- tains nearly all physiologically as well as ana- tion in track 6 and of the vibrissae, lower tomically identified cortico-spinal projection lip and tongue from stimulation in tracks 3 elements16). Once a muscle movement had and 4. Stimulation of the most anterioruArt been identified by two independent observers, of the orbital gyrus (tracks 1 and 2) evoked the fine muscle contractions were examined movements of the lower lip and tongue. both visually and byuAluAtion. When Jaw movements were obtained from ICMS threshold intensities less than 10 ƒÊA were of an area just adjacent to the anterior end of observed, bipolar wire electrodes were placed orbital sulcus (tracks 5 and 6). These results acutely in jaw, tongue and facial muscles, as demonstrated that the jaw, tongue and oro- 594 Jpn. J. Oral Biol., 33: 592-599, 1991. A B C D T4 T6 T10 Fig. 1 Tracks represented on the cortical surface from which movements of the jaw and orofacial muscles were evoked by ICMS in one cat. A=photograph of the cortical surface of the orbital gyrus and adjacent region of the cat frontal cortex. B=table indicating the penetration tracks and threshold intensities for evoking movements on jaw and orofacial regions. Penetration tracks are numbered from 1 to 10 along the abscissa. The numbers in each frame indicate the stimulus threshold (in ) for producing each movement. eye l.=eyelid lowering, vibrissae=movement of vibrissae,uA lower lip=movement of lower lip, j. o.=jaw opening, j. c.=jaw closing, tongue=tongue move- ment. C=schematic drawing of the orbital gyrus. The two regions of the orbital gyrus (a, b) are seuArated by a dotted line; the line between a and b is vertical to the orbital sulcus. D= sample records of EMG activites of jaw and orofacial muscles at tracks 4, 6 and 10. Note that tracks 1 to 8 are located in the anterior portion of the orbitalgyrus (a) and tracks 9 and 10 are in the posterior portion (b). COR=coronal sulcus, ORB=orbital sulcus, PRESYL=presylvian sulcus, RHIN=rhinal sulcus, cl=contralateral lower lip, il=ipsilateral lower lip, cv=contralateral vibrissae, iv=ipsilateral vibrissae, e=eye lid lowering, t=tongue movement, c. dig=contralateral digastric muscle, i. dig=ipsilateral digastric muscle. facial motor zones were represented on the obtained from 155 tracks were as follows: 33.5 orbital gyrus along the orbital sulcus. Further- 7.5 ms for facial muscles (Fig. 2 A); 31.5•} •} more, it can be seen that the largest repre- 8.1 ms for tongue muscle (Fig. 2 B); 25.5•} sentation within this effective region was 4.4 ms for masticatory muscles (Fig. 2 C). devoted to the facial musculature, as described These results indicate that latencies for EMG for the conscious monkey10). In the present activities of facial and tongue muscles were study, the orbital gyrus was seuArated into statistically longer than those of masticatory two different jaw, tongue and orofacial motor muscles (p<0.01: Mann-Whitney U test) zones (shown as a and b in Fig. 1 C). Sam- and that there were no differences between ple records of EMG activities evoked by sti- facial and tongue muscles. mulation of each of these zones are shown 2. Intracortical representation of the jaw in Fig. 1 D. The mean latencies (•}standard and orofacial motor zones deviation) of EMG activities following ICMS In the present study, a total of 571 loci Y.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 10041.Full.Pdf
    The Journal of Neuroscience, July 23, 2014 • 34(30):10041–10054 • 10041 Systems/Circuits Frontal Cortical and Subcortical Projections Provide a Basis for Segmenting the Cingulum Bundle: Implications for Neuroimaging and Psychiatric Disorders Sarah R. Heilbronner and Suzanne N. Haber Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642 The cingulum bundle (CB) is one of the brain’s major white matter pathways, linking regions associated with executive function, decision-making, and emotion. Neuroimaging has revealed that abnormalities in particular locations within the CB are associated with specific psychiatric disorders, including depression and bipolar disorder. However, the fibers using each portion of the CB remain unknown. In this study, we used anatomical tract-tracing in nonhuman primates (Macaca nemestrina, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta)toexaminetheorganizationofspecificcingulate,noncingulatefrontal,andsubcorticalpathwaysthroughtheCB.Thegoalswere as follows: (1) to determine connections that use the CB, (2) to establish through which parts of the CB these fibers travel, and (3) to relate the CB fiber pathways to the portions of the CB identified in humans as neurosurgical targets for amelioration of psychiatric disorders. Results indicate that cingulate, noncingulate frontal, and subcortical fibers all travel through the CB to reach both cingulate and noncin- gulate targets. However, many brain regions send projections through only part, not all, of the CB. For example, amygdala fibers are not present in the caudal portion of the dorsal CB. These results allow segmentation of the CB into four unique zones. We identify the specific connections that are abnormal in psychiatric disorders and affected by neurosurgical interventions, such as deep brain stimulation and cingulotomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans Ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai
    Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai To cite this version: Hans ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai. Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, Frontiers, 2018, 12, pp.93. 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093. hal-01929541 HAL Id: hal-01929541 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01929541 Submitted on 21 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. REVIEW published: 19 November 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093 Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans J. ten Donkelaar 1*†, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer 2† and Jürgen K. Mai 3† 1 Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2 IMN Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives UMR 5293, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 3 Institute for Anatomy, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany The gyri and sulci of the human brain were defined by pioneers such as Louis-Pierre Gratiolet and Alexander Ecker, and extensified by, among others, Dejerine (1895) and von Economo and Koskinas (1925).
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information for “Endocast Morphology of Homo Naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa” Ralph L. Holloway, S
    Supporting Information for “Endocast Morphology of Homo naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa” Ralph L. Holloway, Shawn D. Hurst, Heather M. Garvin, P. Thomas Schoenemann, William B. Vanti, Lee R. Berger, and John Hawks What follows are our descriptions, illustrations, some basic interpretation, and a more specific discussion of the functional, comparative, and taxonomic issues surrounding these hominins. We use the neuroanatomical nomenclature from Duvernoy (19). DH1 Occipital The DH1 occipital fragment (Figs 1, S2) measures ca 105 mm in width between left temporo- occipital incisure and right sigmoid sinus. It is 61 mm in height on the left side, and 47 mm on the right side. The fragment covers the entire left and mostly complete right occipital lobes. The lobes are strongly asymmetrical, with the left clearly larger than the right, and more posteriorly protruding. There are faint traces of a lateral remnant of the lunate sulcus on the left side, and a dorsal bounding lunate as well (#4 and #6 in Fig 1). The right side shows a very small groove at the end of the lateral sinus, which could be a remnant of the lunate sulcus. The major flow from the longitudinal sinus is to the right. Small portions of both cerebellar lobes, roughly 15 mm in height are present. There is a suggestion of a great cerebellar sulcus on the right side. The width from the left lateral lunate impression to the midline is 43mm. The distance from left occipital pole (the most posteriorly projecting point, based on our best estimate of the proper orientation) to the mid-sagittal plane is 30 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Scent of Human Olfactory Orbitofrontal Cortex: Meta-Analysis and Comparison to Non-Human Primates
    Brain Research Reviews 50 (2005) 287 – 304 www.elsevier.com/locate/brainresrev Review On the scent of human olfactory orbitofrontal cortex: Meta-analysis and comparison to non-human primates Jay A. Gottfrieda,*, David H. Zaldb aDepartment of Neurology and the Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 320 E. Superior St., Searle 11-453, Chicago, IL 60611, USA bDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA Accepted 25 August 2005 Available online 6 October 2005 Abstract It is widely accepted that the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) represents the main neocortical target of primary olfactory cortex. In non-human primates, the olfactory neocortex is situated along the basal surface of the caudal frontal lobes, encompassing agranular and dysgranular OFC medially and agranular insula laterally, where this latter structure wraps onto the posterior orbital surface. Direct afferent inputs arrive from most primary olfactory areas, including piriform cortex, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex, in the absence of an obligatory thalamic relay. While such findings are almost exclusively derived from animal data, recent cytoarchitectonic studies indicate a close anatomical correspondence between non-human primate and human OFC. Given this cross-species conservation of structure, it has generally been presumed that the olfactory projection area in human OFC occupies the same posterior portions of OFC as seen in non-human primates. This review questions this assumption by providing a critical survey of the localization of primate and human olfactory neocortex. Based on a meta-analysis of human functional neuroimaging studies, the region of human OFC showing the greatest olfactory responsivity appears substantially rostral and in a different cytoarchitectural area than the orbital olfactory regions as defined in the monkey.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/200480 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-05 and may be subject to change. REVIEW published: 19 November 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093 Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans J. ten Donkelaar 1*†, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer 2† and Jürgen K. Mai 3† 1 Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2 IMN Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives UMR 5293, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 3 Institute for Anatomy, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany The gyri and sulci of the human brain were defined by pioneers such as Louis-Pierre Gratiolet and Alexander Ecker, and extensified by, among others, Dejerine (1895) and von Economo and Koskinas (1925). Extensive discussions of the cerebral sulci and their variations were presented by Ono et al. (1990), Duvernoy (1992), Tamraz and Comair (2000), and Rhoton (2007). An anatomical parcellation of the spatially normalized single high resolution T1 volume provided by the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI; Collins, 1994; Collins et al., 1998) was used for the macroscopical labeling of functional studies (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002; Rolls et al., 2015). In the standard atlas of the human brain by Mai et al. (2016), the terminology from Mai and Paxinos (2012) is used. It contains an extensively analyzed individual brain hemisphere in the MNI- space.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortical Parcellation Protocol
    CORTICAL PARCELLATION PROTOCOL APRIL 5, 2010 © 2010 NEUROMORPHOMETRICS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINCIPAL AUTHORS: Jason Tourville, Ph.D. Research Assistant Professor Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems Boston University Ruth Carper, Ph.D. Assistant Research Scientist Center for Human Development University of California, San Diego Georges Salamon, M.D. Research Dept., Radiology David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MANY OTHERS Neuromorphometrics, Inc. 22 Westminster Street Somerville MA, 02144-1630 Phone/Fax (617) 776-7844 neuromorphometrics.com OVERVIEW The cerebral cortex is divided into 49 macro-anatomically defined regions in each hemisphere that are of broad interest to the neuroimaging community. Region of interest (ROI) boundary definitions were derived from a number of cortical labeling methods currently in use. Protocols from the Laboratory of Neuroimaging at UCLA (LONI; Shattuck et al., 2008), the University of Iowa Mental Health Clinical Research Center (IOWA; Crespo-Facorro et al., 2000; Kim et al., 2000), the Center for Morphometric Analysis at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH-CMA; Caviness et al., 1996), a collaboration between the Freesurfer group at MGH and Boston University School of Medicine (MGH-Desikan; Desikan et al., 2006), and UC San Diego (Carper & Courchesne, 2000; Carper & Courchesne, 2005; Carper et al., 2002) are specifically referenced in the protocol below. Methods developed at Boston University (Tourville & Guenther, 2003), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (McCarley & Shenton, 2008), Stanford (Allan Reiss lab), the University of Maryland (Buchanan et al., 2004), and the University of Toyoma (Zhou et al., 2007) were also consulted. The development of the protocol was also guided by the Ono, Kubik, and Abernathy (1990), Duvernoy (1999), and Mai, Paxinos, and Voss (Mai et al., 2008) neuroanatomical atlases.
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Cortical Anatomy
    Normal Cortical Anatomy MGH Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School NORMAL CORTICAL ANATOMY • Sagittal • Axial • Coronal • The Central Sulcus NP/MGH Sagittal Neuroanatomy NP/MGH Cingulate sulcus Superior frontal gyrus Marginal ramus of Cingulate sulcus Cingulate gyrus Paracentral lobule Superior parietal lobule Parietooccipital sulcus Cuneus Calcarine sulcus Lingual gyrus Subcallosal gyrus Gyrus rectus Fastigium, fourth ventricle NP/MGH Superior frontal gyrus Cingulate sulcus Precentral gyrus Marginal ramus of Cingulate gyrus Central sulcus Cingulate sulcus Superior parietal lobule Precuneus Parietooccipital sulcus Cuneus Calcarine sulcus Frontomarginal gyrus Lingual gyrus Caudothallamic groove Gyrus rectus NP/MGH Precentral sulcus Central sulcus Superior frontal gyrus Marginal ramus of Corona radiata Cingulate sulcus Superior parietal lobule Precuneus Parietooccipital sulcus Calcarine sulcus Inferior occipital gyrus Lingual gyrus NP/MGH Central sulcus Superior parietal lobule Parietooccipital sulcus Frontopolar gyrus Frontomarginal gyrus Superior occipital gyrus Middle occipital gyrus Medial orbital gyrus Lingual gyrus Posterior orbital gyrus Inferior occipital gyrus Inferior temporal gyrus Temporal horn, lateral ventricle NP/MGH Central sulcus Superior Temporal gyrus Middle Temporal gyrus Inferior Temporal gyrus NP/MGH Central sulcus Superior parietal gyrus Inferior frontal gyrus Frontomarginal gyrus Anterior orbital gyrus Superior occipital gyrus Middle occipital Posterior orbital gyrus gyrus Superior Temporal gyrus Inferior
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity Reveals Relationship of Brain Areas for Reward-Guided
    Connectivity reveals relationship of brain areas for PNAS PLUS reward-guided learning and decision making in human and monkey frontal cortex Franz-Xaver Neuberta,1, Rogier B. Marsa,b,c, Jérôme Salleta, and Matthew F. S. Rushwortha,b aDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom and bCentre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom; and cDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands Edited by Ranulfo Romo, Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México, Mexico City, D.F., Mexico, and approved February 25, 2015 (received for review June 9, 2014) Reward-guided decision-making depends on a network of brain distinct processes for task control, error detection, and conflict regions. Among these are the orbitofrontal and the anterior resolution (13, 14). Reliable identification and location of ACC cingulate cortex. However, it is difficult to ascertain if these areas subcomponent regions could assist the resolution of such debates. constitute anatomical and functional unities, and how these areas In the present study we formally compared brain regions im- correspond between monkeys and humans. To address these plicated in reward-guided decision making and learning in humans questions we looked at connectivity profiles of these areas using and monkeys, and attempted to identify their key subdivisions in resting-state functional MRI in 38 humans and 25 macaque relation to function (Fig. 1). We used fMRI in 25 monkeys and 38 monkeys. We sought brain regions in the macaque that resembled humans to delineate the functional interactions of “decision- 10 human areas identified with decision making and brain regions making regions” with other areas in the brain while subjects were in the human that resembled six macaque areas identified with decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Topographically Specific Hippocampal Projections Target Functionally Distinct Prefrontal Areas in the Rhesus Monkey
    HIPPOCAMPUS 5:511-533 (1995) Topographically Specific Hippocampal Projections Target Functionally Distinct Prefrontal Areas in the Rhesus Monkey Helen Barbas1r2and Gene J. Blatt2 [Department of Health Sciences, Boston University and lJ2Departmentof Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts ABSTRACT: The sources of ipsilateral projections from the hippocam- KEY WORDS: medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal pal formation, the presubiculum, area 29a-c, and parasubiculum to me- cortex, memory, CA1, subiculum, .presubiculum, area dial, orbital, and lateral prefrontal cortices were studied with retrograde 29, lateral prefrontal cortex, working memory tracers in 27 rhesus monkeys. labeled neurons within the hippocampal formation (CA1, CA1’, prosubiculum, and subiculum) were found ros- trally, although some were noted throughout the entire rostrocaudal ex- tent of the hippocampal formation. Most labeled neurons in the hip- pocampal formation projected to medial prefrontal cortices, followed by orbital areas. In addition, there were differences in the topography of af- ferent neurons projecting to medial when compared with orbital cortices. Labeled neurons innervating medial cortices were found mainly in the The prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey is a large CA1’ and CA1 fields rostrally, but originated in the subicular fields cau- cortical cxpanse associated with complex cognitive, dally. In contrast, labeled neurons which innervated orbital cortices were mnemonic, and emotional processes (for rcvicws, see considerably more focal, emanating from the same relative position within Fuster, 1989; Barbas, 1995a). The functions of pre- a field throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the hippocampal formation. frontal areas are likely to depend on their connections In marked contrast to the pattern of projection to medial and orbital prefrontal cortices, lateral prefrontal areas received projections from only with other cortical and subcortical structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Reorganization of the Neurobiology of Language After Sentence Overlearning
    Sentence overlearning 1 Reorganization of the neurobiology of language after sentence overlearning 1* 1,2 3 1 4 Jeremy I Skipper ,​ Sarah Aliko ,​ Stephen Brown ,​ Yoon Ju Jo ,​ Serena Lo ,​ Emilia 5 ​ ​ 1,6 ​ ​ ​ Molimpakis ​ and Daniel R Lametti ​ ​ 1 E​ xperimental Psychology, University College London, UK 2 L​ ondon Interdisciplinary Biosciences Consortium, University College London, UK 3 N​ atural Sciences, University College London, UK 4 S​ peech and Language Sciences, University College London, UK 5 W​ ellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, UK 6 D​ epartment of Psychology, Acadia University, Nova Scotia, Canada * C​ orresponding author, [email protected] ​ Supplementary Material Figure Captions Figure S1. Additional novel listening linear mixed-effects model results. General linear test ​ contrasting novel sentences from session one (blues) and two (reds) in the left (LH) and right hemispheres (RH) presented on lateral (top) and medial (bottom) surface views. The colour bar represents z-scores and the images are thresholded at an alpha (α) level of p < .01, corrected for multiple comparisons. Figure S2. Additional overlearned sentence listening linear mixed-effects model results. A) ​ Session one general linear test (GLT) for sentence; B) Session two GLT for sentence; C) Direct contrast of session one sentences (blues) with session two sentences (reds). The top two rows are the left hemisphere (LH) while the bottom two are the right hemispheres (RH) lateral and medial surface views. The colour bar represents z-scores and the images are thresholded at an alpha (α) level of p < .01, corrected for multiple comparisons. Figure S3. Additional overlearned minus novel sentence listening linear mixed-effects model ​ results.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Anatomy Outlines Note: Please Email Errors to [email protected] So I Can Update the Outlines
    Frank Mihlon Last partial edit 9/16/12 Brain Anatomy Outlines Note: Please email errors to [email protected] so I can update the outlines. Gyri (sources: Duvernoy. The Human Brain. 1999 and Stippich. Clinical functional MRI. 2007) • Frontal Lobe gyri o Precentral Gyrus o Superior frontal gyrus (F1) o Middle frontal gyrus (F2) o Inferior frontal gyrus (F3) ! Pars orbitalis (rostrally) ! Pars triangularis (mid) • (PO + PT = frontal operculum) ! Pars opercularis (caudally) o Frontal pole (rostral merging of the three major gyri) ! Superior frontopolar gyrus ! Inferior frontopolar gyrus ! Variable: middle frontopolar gyrus ! Variable: frontomarginal gyrus • Orbital lobe (inferior surface of frontal lobe) o Gyrus rectus (part of F1) o Medial orbital gyrus (part of F1) o Anterior orbital gyrus (part of F2) o Lateral orbital gyrus (part of F2 rostrally and F3 caudally) o Posterior orbital gyrus (part of F3) • Insula (Island of Reil) o 3 Short insular gyri (rostrally) o 2 Long insular gyri (caudally) o Limen insulae ! small gyrus that connects the frontal lobe (posterior orbital gyrus) and insula ! lateral to the anterior perforated substance ! floor (note: I think the roof) of the basal part of the lateral fissure • Temporal lobe gyri o Superior temporal gyrus (T1) (3 parts) ! Planum polare (rostrally) ! Anterior and Posterior Transverse temporal gyri (of Heschl) ! Planum temporale (caudally) o Middle temporal gyrus (T2) o Inferior temporal gyrus (T3) o Temporal pole (rostral merging of the three major gyri) o Fusiform gyrus (T4) (aka lateral
    [Show full text]
  • Cortex Monkey
    NEURONOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF MEDIAL AND BASAL CEREBRAL CORTEX. II. MONKEY KARL H. PRIBRAM AND PAUL D. MACLEAN Reprinted from J. Neurophysiol., 1953,16: 324-340 .' NEURONOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF MEDIAL AND BASAL CEREBRAL CORTEX. II. MONKEYl KARL H. PRIBRAM2 AND PAUL D. MAcLEAN Laboratory of Physiology and Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut ATTEMPTS TO ANALYZE the highly complex behavioral effects of large cere­ brallesions of the frontal and temporal lobes have emphasized the need for more information regarding the functional organization of the cortex on the medial and basal aspects of the hemispheres. Comparative, ontogenetic, and cytoarchitectural studies have drawn a distinction between the cortex sur­ rounding the hilus of each hemisphere, known as the great limbic lobe (6), and the rest of'the cerebral mantle. It has consequently been postulated that lesions limited to the limbic system and the adjacent related cortex would result in behavioral changes distinctive from those restricted to the phylo­ genetically newer part of the forebrain. In order to test this hypothesis and to have a guide for making lesions, knowledge was required concerning the related areas of limbic and extralimbic cortex. The method of physiological neuronography was applied in this study for obtaining such information. In both cat and monkey five corresponding large regions, each including limbic and extralimbic cortex, were delineated. The experiments on cat were reported in the preceding communication. This paper deals with the findings in monkey. MATERIALS, METHODS, AND PROCEDURES Twenty Rhesus macacus monkeys were used. Anesthesia was produced with Dial with urethane,3 half given intravenously and half intraperitoneally, in a dosage of 0.4 cc./kg.
    [Show full text]