Brain Anatomy Outlines Note: Please Email Errors to [email protected] So I Can Update the Outlines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Brain Anatomy Outlines Note: Please Email Errors to Frank.Mihlon@Duke.Edu So I Can Update the Outlines Frank Mihlon Last partial edit 9/16/12 Brain Anatomy Outlines Note: Please email errors to [email protected] so I can update the outlines. Gyri (sources: Duvernoy. The Human Brain. 1999 and Stippich. Clinical functional MRI. 2007) • Frontal Lobe gyri o Precentral Gyrus o Superior frontal gyrus (F1) o Middle frontal gyrus (F2) o Inferior frontal gyrus (F3) ! Pars orbitalis (rostrally) ! Pars triangularis (mid) • (PO + PT = frontal operculum) ! Pars opercularis (caudally) o Frontal pole (rostral merging of the three major gyri) ! Superior frontopolar gyrus ! Inferior frontopolar gyrus ! Variable: middle frontopolar gyrus ! Variable: frontomarginal gyrus • Orbital lobe (inferior surface of frontal lobe) o Gyrus rectus (part of F1) o Medial orbital gyrus (part of F1) o Anterior orbital gyrus (part of F2) o Lateral orbital gyrus (part of F2 rostrally and F3 caudally) o Posterior orbital gyrus (part of F3) • Insula (Island of Reil) o 3 Short insular gyri (rostrally) o 2 Long insular gyri (caudally) o Limen insulae ! small gyrus that connects the frontal lobe (posterior orbital gyrus) and insula ! lateral to the anterior perforated substance ! floor (note: I think the roof) of the basal part of the lateral fissure • Temporal lobe gyri o Superior temporal gyrus (T1) (3 parts) ! Planum polare (rostrally) ! Anterior and Posterior Transverse temporal gyri (of Heschl) ! Planum temporale (caudally) o Middle temporal gyrus (T2) o Inferior temporal gyrus (T3) o Temporal pole (rostral merging of the three major gyri) o Fusiform gyrus (T4) (aka lateral occipitotemporal gyrus) • Limbic gyrus (4 parts) o Subcallosal gyrus o Cingulate gyrus o Isthmus (aka Retrosplenial gyrus)(joins parahippocampal gyrus to cingulate gyrus under splenium) o Parahippocampal gyrus (T5) ! Subiculum • narrow posterior segment • connects hippocamus to parahippocampal gyrus ! Piriform lobe (bulbous anterior segment) • Uncus, anterior part o Semilunar gyrus o Gyrus ambiens • Entorhinal area o Intralimbic gyrus (3 parts: anterior, superior, inferior) ! Prehippocampal rudiment (tiny anterior part; vestigial remnant) ! Indusium griseum (superior part betWeen cingulate and callosum; vestigial remnant) ! Hippocampus (bilaminar inferior part; consists of head, body, and tail) • Cornu ammonis (CA1, CA2, CA3, CA4) • Dentate gyrus (rolled inside cornu ammonis) o (medial occipito-temporal gyrus = T5 parahippocampal gyrus + O5 lingual gyrus) • Parietal lobe gyri o Postcentral gyrus ! Two connections to precentral gyrus (forms a donut) • Subcentral gyrus (ventrally) • Paracentral lobule (dorsally) o Superior parietal lobule (P1) ! Precuneus (medial aspect betWeen pars marginalis and parieto-occipital fissure) ! (first parieto-occipital arcus [“pli de passage” of Gratiolet] merges superior parietal lobule with superior occipital gyrus) o Inferior parietal lobule (P2) ! Supramarginal gyrus (rostrally) ! Angular gyrus (caudally) ! (second parieto-occipital arcus [“pli de passage” of Gratiolet] merges angular gyrus with the middle occipital gyrus) ! (Temporo-occipital arcus merges angular gyrus With superior temporal gyrus) • Occipital lobe (O1-O6 + gyrus descendens of Ecker) o Superior occipital gyrus (O1) (merges With cuneus O6 medially) o Middle occipital gyrus (O2) (laterally) ! Superior part ! Inferior part o Inferior occipital gyrus (O3) o Occipital pole (caudal merging of the three major gyri) o Fusiform gyrus (O4) (T4 fusiform + O4 fusiform = Lateral occipito-temporal gyrus) o Lingual gyrus (O5) (O5 lingual + T5 parahippocampal = Medial occipito-temporal Gyrus) o Cuneus (O6) (well defined betWeen parieto-occipital fissure and calcarine sulcus) o Gyrus descendens (of Ecker) (small superficial vertical gyrus at occipital pole) • Opercula (4) (covering of the insula; latin “little lid”) o Frontal (posterior part of inferior frontal gyrus) ! Pars triangularis ! Pars opercularis o Central (subcentral gyrus) o Parietal (supramarginal gyrus) o Temporal (superior aspect of superior temporal gyrus) Sulci (sources: Duvernoy. The Human Brain. 1999 and Stippich. Clinical functional MRI. 2007) • Lateral fissure (Sylvian fissure) (tWo parts: basal and lateral) o Lateral part (3 segments and 5 major rami) ! Anterior segment (two rami that divide the inferior frontal gyrus) • Anterior horizontal ramus • Anterior ascending ramus ! Middle segment • Posterior horizontal ramus • Minor arms o Anterior subcentral sulcus o Posterior subcentral sulcus o Transverse temporal sulci (outline gyri of Heschle) ! Posterior segment • Posterior ascending ramus ! Posterior descending ramus o Basal part (aka Sylvian cistern) ! Falciform fold marks boundary betWeen lateral and basal part ! Limen insula forms floor of basal part (note: I think it forms the roof) • Frontal lobe o Superior frontal sulcus => superior precentral sulcus o Inferior frontal sulcus => inferior precentral sulcus o *variant: single precentral sulcus o *variant: longitudinal sulcus: extra, sometimes discontinuous, sulcus dividing superior frontal gyrus o *variant: middle frontal sulcus dividing middle frontal gyrus into into a superior and an inferior part and continuing anteriorly as the frontomarginal sulcus. The frontomarginal sulcus creates the frontomarginal gyrus inferiorly by dividing the inferior transverse frontopolar gyrus. o *variant: lateral orbital sulcus betWeen the frontal and orbital lobes, ie, betWeen the inferior frontal gyrus and lateral orbital gyrus o *variant: sulcus triangularis: groove from inferior frontal sulcus that cuts the pars triangularis o *variant: sulcus diagonalis: groove from anterior ascending ramus that cuts the pars opercularis • Orbital lobe o Medial orbital sulcus ! aka Olfactory sulcus ! betWeen gyrus rectus and medial orbital gyrus o H-shaped orbital sulcus (beWeen the four orbital gyri) o Arcuate orbital sulcus ! divergent ramus of the posterior lateral part of the H-shaped orbital sulcus ! betWeen lateral/medial orbital gyri and posterior orbital gyrus • Central sulcus (of Rolando) o *variant: gyrus bridging precentral and postcentral gyrus that divides the central sulcus into a superior segment and inferior segment • Insular sulci o Circular sulcus (separates insular cortex from lateral opercular cortex) o Central insular sulcus (divides anterior from posterior parts) o Falciform fold ! notch at the apex of the inverted triangle that is the insula ! boundary betWeen lateral and basal parts of the lateral fissure • Temporo-occipital incisure • Temporal lobe o Superior temporal sulcus (2 segments) (aka parallel sulcus) ! Anterior segment, reaches temporal pole ! Posterior segment (branches posteriorly into 2 segments that create the “M” shape of the angular gyrus) • Ascending posterior segment (aka Sulcus Angularis) • Horizontal posterior segment o Inferior temporal sulcus ! Usually not continuous and difficult to identify ! Posterior end may slope upWard and be called anterior occipital sulcus o Collateral sulcus ! (aka Medial occipitotemporal sulcus) ! Separates parahippocampal gyrus from inferior temporal gyrus anteriorly and fusiform gyrus (lateral occipitotemporal gyrus) posteriorly ! 2 rami that project inferolaterally • Anterior transverse collateral sulcus • Posterior transvers collateral sulcus o Lateral occipitotemporal sulcus (betWeen T4 fusiform/lateral occipitotemporal gyrus and T3 inferior temporal gyrus) • Intraparietal sulcus (3 segments) o Ascending segment ! aka inferior postcentral sulcus ! parallel to central sulcus o Horizontal segment (separates superior from inferior parietal lobule) ! Primary intermediate sulcus (of Jensen) • Descending ramus off the horizontal segment • separates marginal from angular gyrus ! Transverse parietal sulcus arises superiorly from the horizontal segment as a medial continuation of the intraparietal sulcus that splits the precuneus (medial surface of superior parietal lobule) and continues inferocaudally as the subparietal sulcus (part of the limbic fissure) o Descending segment (crosses theoretical lobar border to continue as the intraoccipital sulcus aka superior occipital sulcus) • Superior postcentral sulcus (isolated sulcus that splits the postcentral gyrus) • Occipital lobe o Lateral surface ! Superior occipital sulcus • aka intraoccipital sulcus • continuation of the intraparietal sulcus • terminates in the Transverse Occipital Sulcus ! Middle occipital sulcus (variable) • Splits middle occipital gyrus • Sulcus semilunatus (variable) posterior ramus of the middle occipital sulcus ! Inferior occipital sulcus (variable) o Medial and inferior surface ! Parietooccipital sulcus ! Calcarine sulcus • separates O6 cuneus from O5 lingual gyrus • 3 segments o middle: calcarine sulcus proper o anterior: anterior calcarine sulcus ! continuation of the junction of calcarine and occipito- parietal sulci ! part of limbic fissure o posterior: retrocalcarine sulcus ! Collateral sulcus, occipital part (aka medial occipitotemporal sulcus) • Limbic fissure (succession of 6 different and discontinuous sulci) o Anterior para-olfactory sulcus (aka subcallosal sulcus) ! Posterior branch of susorbital sulcus ! Divides subcallosal gyrus (beneath CC genu) from orbital lobe anteriorly o Cingulate sulcus ! aka Callosomarginal sulcus ! marginal segment aka pars marginalis o Subparietal sulcus (between precuneus and cingulate gyrus) o Anterior calcarine sulcus (betWeen isthmus and O5 lingual gyrus) o Collateral sulcus ! (aka Medial occipitotemporal sulcus) ! Separates parahippocampal gyrus from inferior temporal gyrus anteriorly and fusiform gyrus (lateral occipitotemporal
Recommended publications
  • 10041.Full.Pdf
    The Journal of Neuroscience, July 23, 2014 • 34(30):10041–10054 • 10041 Systems/Circuits Frontal Cortical and Subcortical Projections Provide a Basis for Segmenting the Cingulum Bundle: Implications for Neuroimaging and Psychiatric Disorders Sarah R. Heilbronner and Suzanne N. Haber Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642 The cingulum bundle (CB) is one of the brain’s major white matter pathways, linking regions associated with executive function, decision-making, and emotion. Neuroimaging has revealed that abnormalities in particular locations within the CB are associated with specific psychiatric disorders, including depression and bipolar disorder. However, the fibers using each portion of the CB remain unknown. In this study, we used anatomical tract-tracing in nonhuman primates (Macaca nemestrina, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta)toexaminetheorganizationofspecificcingulate,noncingulatefrontal,andsubcorticalpathwaysthroughtheCB.Thegoalswere as follows: (1) to determine connections that use the CB, (2) to establish through which parts of the CB these fibers travel, and (3) to relate the CB fiber pathways to the portions of the CB identified in humans as neurosurgical targets for amelioration of psychiatric disorders. Results indicate that cingulate, noncingulate frontal, and subcortical fibers all travel through the CB to reach both cingulate and noncin- gulate targets. However, many brain regions send projections through only part, not all, of the CB. For example, amygdala fibers are not present in the caudal portion of the dorsal CB. These results allow segmentation of the CB into four unique zones. We identify the specific connections that are abnormal in psychiatric disorders and affected by neurosurgical interventions, such as deep brain stimulation and cingulotomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Temporal Lobe
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Epilepsy Research and Treatment Volume 2012, Article ID 176157, 12 pages doi:10.1155/2012/176157 Review Article AnatomyoftheTemporalLobe J. A. Kiernan Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1 Correspondence should be addressed to J. A. Kiernan, [email protected] Received 6 October 2011; Accepted 3 December 2011 Academic Editor: Seyed M. Mirsattari Copyright © 2012 J. A. Kiernan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Only primates have temporal lobes, which are largest in man, accommodating 17% of the cerebral cortex and including areas with auditory, olfactory, vestibular, visual and linguistic functions. The hippocampal formation, on the medial side of the lobe, includes the parahippocampal gyrus, subiculum, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, and associated white matter, notably the fimbria, whose fibres continue into the fornix. The hippocampus is an inrolled gyrus that bulges into the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle. Association fibres connect all parts of the cerebral cortex with the parahippocampal gyrus and subiculum, which in turn project to the dentate gyrus. The largest efferent projection of the subiculum and hippocampus is through the fornix to the hypothalamus. The choroid fissure, alongside the fimbria, separates the temporal lobe from the optic tract, hypothalamus and midbrain. The amygdala comprises several nuclei on the medial aspect of the temporal lobe, mostly anterior the hippocampus and indenting the tip of the temporal horn. The amygdala receives input from the olfactory bulb and from association cortex for other modalities of sensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans Ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai
    Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai To cite this version: Hans ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai. Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, Frontiers, 2018, 12, pp.93. 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093. hal-01929541 HAL Id: hal-01929541 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01929541 Submitted on 21 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. REVIEW published: 19 November 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093 Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans J. ten Donkelaar 1*†, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer 2† and Jürgen K. Mai 3† 1 Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2 IMN Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives UMR 5293, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 3 Institute for Anatomy, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany The gyri and sulci of the human brain were defined by pioneers such as Louis-Pierre Gratiolet and Alexander Ecker, and extensified by, among others, Dejerine (1895) and von Economo and Koskinas (1925).
    [Show full text]
  • Connection Interfaces Between Neuronal Elements and Structures Inside Greater Limbic System
    Rom J Leg Med [21] 137-148 [2013] DOI: 10.4323/rjlm.2013.137 © 2013 Romanian Society of Legal Medicine Connection interfaces between neuronal elements and structures inside greater limbic system. Evaluation in forensic psycho-affective pathology Gheorghe S. Dragoi1, Petru Razvan Melinte2, Liviu Radu3 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: The authors achieved a macroanatomic analysis on the location and relations of neuronal structures and elements inside transitional mesocortex and archicortex in order to visualize the connection interfaces of greater limbic system. The analysis was performed on human encephalon using subsystems generally homologated by neuroanatomists: lobus limbicus, hippocampal formation, prefrontal cortex, lobus insularis and subcortical structures. Equally, they performed a research of the literature on the implication of connection interfaces from paralimbic, limbic and archicortex areas, into forensic psycho-affective ortology and pathology. The study draws the attention to time and space development of terminology and homologation of some new concepts bound to multifunctional subsystems such as: medial temporal lobe memory system, prefrontal cortex and limbic midbrain area. Key Words: greater limbic system, transitional mesocortex, archicortex euroanatomy registered remarkable progress (proneocortical or paralimbic zone and periarchicortical or by the diversity of morph-functional and limbic zone); hippocampal formation (with two regions: N anatomic-clinical
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociable Large-Scale Networks Anchored in the Right Anterior Insula Subserve Affective Experience and Attention
    NeuroImage 60 (2012) 1947–1958 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect NeuroImage journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg Dissociable large-scale networks anchored in the right anterior insula subserve affective experience and attention Alexandra Touroutoglou a,b, Mark Hollenbeck a,b,c, Bradford C. Dickerson a,b,c,1, Lisa Feldman Barrett a,b,d,1,⁎ a Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA b Psychiatric Neuroimaging Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA c Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA d Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA article info abstract Article history: Meta-analytic summaries of neuroimaging studies point to at least two major functional-anatomic subdivi- Received 12 November 2011 sions within the anterior insula that contribute to the detection and processing of salient information: a dor- Revised 25 January 2012 sal region that is routinely active during attention tasks and a ventral region that is routinely active during Accepted 4 February 2012 affective experience. In two independent samples of cognitively normal human adults, we used intrinsic Available online 13 February 2012 functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging to demonstrate that the right dorsal and right ventral anterior insula are nodes in separable large-scale functional networks. Furthermore, stronger intrinsic con- Keywords: Dorsal anterior insula nectivity within the right dorsal anterior insula network was associated with better performance on a task Ventral anterior insula involving attention and processing speed whereas stronger connectivity within the right ventral anterior Intrinsic functional connectivity insula network was associated with more intense affective experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemosensory Perception: a Review on Electrophysiological Methods in “Cognitive Neuro-Olfactometry”
    chemosensors Review Chemosensory Perception: A Review on Electrophysiological Methods in “Cognitive Neuro-Olfactometry” Sara Invitto * and Alberto Grasso INSPIRE Laboratory of Cognitive and Psychophysiological Olfactory Processes, DiSTeBA, University of Salento and DrEAM Vito Fazzi Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 August 2019; Accepted: 10 September 2019; Published: 12 September 2019 Abstract: Various brain imaging techniques are available, but few are specifically designed to visualize chemical sensory and, in particular, olfactory processing. This review describes the results of quantitative and qualitative studies that have used electroencephalography (EEG) and magneto-encephalography (MEG) to evaluate responses to olfactory stimulation (OS). EEG and MEG are able to detect the components of chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERPs) and the cortical rhythms associated with different types of OS. Olfactory studies are filling the gaps in both the developmental field of the life cycle (from newborns to geriatric age) and the clinical and basic research fields, in a way that can be considered the modern “cognitive neuro-olfactometry”. Keywords: EEG; OERP; CSERP; olfactory stimulation; olfactory perception; chemical detection systems 1. Introduction to Electrophysiological Techniques and Chemical Perception Neuroimaging techniques allow us to investigate the neuronal mechanisms underlying information processing, and are an indispensable tool in efforts to gain a greater understanding
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomic Significance of Topographical Relief in the Pars Basalis Telencephali
    Rom J Leg Med [27] 1-9 [2019] DOI: 10.4323/rjlm.2019.1 © 2019 Romanian Society of Legal Medicine FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH Anatomic significance of topographical relief in the pars basalis telencephali. Implications in forensic psychopathology Gheorghe S. Drăgoi1,2,*, Ileana Marinescu3 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: Topographical relief situated in the pars basalis telencephali have always been aspects of interest for anatomists and neurologists with regard to their terming and integration in neuronal systems. The main target of the present work is the macroanatonic analysis of the location and relations of reference anatomic markers of topographical relief on which connections of anatomical and functional areas are based. The study was carried out on human biological samples. Twenty samples of lesion- free encephala were taken from 8 men (aged between 36 and 65), 7 women (aged between 41 and 69) and 5 new-born infants (2 males and 3 females). Based on reference anatomic markers, identification of anatomic and functional area borderlines was done in the subcalloso – olfactory space. According to morphological variability the markers were grouped in 3 classes: a) commissural interconnective markers; b) non-commissural interconnective markers; c) markers modelled by the branches of the anterior cerebral artery. Based on our research and further corroboration with the progress made in the research of topographical relief as well as of the experimental results on septal nuclei, we offer an attempt at clarifying of the semantic content of taxonomy of terms as well as their implication in forensic phychopathology. Key Words: septum verum, subcallosal area, paraterminal gyrus, paraolfactory area, paraolfactory gyri. INTRODUCTION [7]; Cruveilhier (1836)[8]; Bergman (1831)[9]; Meynert (1867)[10]; Broca (1879)[11]; și Zuckerkandl (1887) Topographical relief variation in the pars basalis [12].
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information for “Endocast Morphology of Homo Naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa” Ralph L. Holloway, S
    Supporting Information for “Endocast Morphology of Homo naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa” Ralph L. Holloway, Shawn D. Hurst, Heather M. Garvin, P. Thomas Schoenemann, William B. Vanti, Lee R. Berger, and John Hawks What follows are our descriptions, illustrations, some basic interpretation, and a more specific discussion of the functional, comparative, and taxonomic issues surrounding these hominins. We use the neuroanatomical nomenclature from Duvernoy (19). DH1 Occipital The DH1 occipital fragment (Figs 1, S2) measures ca 105 mm in width between left temporo- occipital incisure and right sigmoid sinus. It is 61 mm in height on the left side, and 47 mm on the right side. The fragment covers the entire left and mostly complete right occipital lobes. The lobes are strongly asymmetrical, with the left clearly larger than the right, and more posteriorly protruding. There are faint traces of a lateral remnant of the lunate sulcus on the left side, and a dorsal bounding lunate as well (#4 and #6 in Fig 1). The right side shows a very small groove at the end of the lateral sinus, which could be a remnant of the lunate sulcus. The major flow from the longitudinal sinus is to the right. Small portions of both cerebellar lobes, roughly 15 mm in height are present. There is a suggestion of a great cerebellar sulcus on the right side. The width from the left lateral lunate impression to the midline is 43mm. The distance from left occipital pole (the most posteriorly projecting point, based on our best estimate of the proper orientation) to the mid-sagittal plane is 30 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Scent of Human Olfactory Orbitofrontal Cortex: Meta-Analysis and Comparison to Non-Human Primates
    Brain Research Reviews 50 (2005) 287 – 304 www.elsevier.com/locate/brainresrev Review On the scent of human olfactory orbitofrontal cortex: Meta-analysis and comparison to non-human primates Jay A. Gottfrieda,*, David H. Zaldb aDepartment of Neurology and the Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 320 E. Superior St., Searle 11-453, Chicago, IL 60611, USA bDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA Accepted 25 August 2005 Available online 6 October 2005 Abstract It is widely accepted that the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) represents the main neocortical target of primary olfactory cortex. In non-human primates, the olfactory neocortex is situated along the basal surface of the caudal frontal lobes, encompassing agranular and dysgranular OFC medially and agranular insula laterally, where this latter structure wraps onto the posterior orbital surface. Direct afferent inputs arrive from most primary olfactory areas, including piriform cortex, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex, in the absence of an obligatory thalamic relay. While such findings are almost exclusively derived from animal data, recent cytoarchitectonic studies indicate a close anatomical correspondence between non-human primate and human OFC. Given this cross-species conservation of structure, it has generally been presumed that the olfactory projection area in human OFC occupies the same posterior portions of OFC as seen in non-human primates. This review questions this assumption by providing a critical survey of the localization of primate and human olfactory neocortex. Based on a meta-analysis of human functional neuroimaging studies, the region of human OFC showing the greatest olfactory responsivity appears substantially rostral and in a different cytoarchitectural area than the orbital olfactory regions as defined in the monkey.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/200480 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-05 and may be subject to change. REVIEW published: 19 November 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093 Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans J. ten Donkelaar 1*†, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer 2† and Jürgen K. Mai 3† 1 Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2 IMN Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives UMR 5293, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 3 Institute for Anatomy, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany The gyri and sulci of the human brain were defined by pioneers such as Louis-Pierre Gratiolet and Alexander Ecker, and extensified by, among others, Dejerine (1895) and von Economo and Koskinas (1925). Extensive discussions of the cerebral sulci and their variations were presented by Ono et al. (1990), Duvernoy (1992), Tamraz and Comair (2000), and Rhoton (2007). An anatomical parcellation of the spatially normalized single high resolution T1 volume provided by the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI; Collins, 1994; Collins et al., 1998) was used for the macroscopical labeling of functional studies (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002; Rolls et al., 2015). In the standard atlas of the human brain by Mai et al. (2016), the terminology from Mai and Paxinos (2012) is used. It contains an extensively analyzed individual brain hemisphere in the MNI- space.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemosensory Perception: a Review on Electrophysiological Methods in “Cognitive Neuro-Olfactometry”
    Review Chemosensory Perception: A Review on Electrophysiological Methods in “Cognitive Neuro-Olfactometry” Sara Invitto * and Alberto Grasso INSPIRE Laboratory of Cognitive and Psychophysiological Olfactory Processes, DiSTeBA, University of Salento and DrEAM Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce 73100, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 August 2019; Accepted: 10 September 2019; Published: 12 September 2019 Abstract: Various brain imaging techniques are available, but few are specifically designed to visualize chemical sensory and, in particular, olfactory processing. This review describes the results of quantitative and qualitative studies that have used electroencephalography (EEG) and magneto- encephalography (MEG) to evaluate responses to olfactory stimulation (OS). EEG and MEG are able to detect the components of chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERPs) and the cortical rhythms associated with different types of OS. Olfactory studies are filling the gaps in both the developmental field of the life cycle (from newborns to geriatric age) and the clinical and basic research fields, in a way that can be considered the modern “cognitive neuro-olfactometry”. Keywords: EEG; OERP; CSERP; Olfactory Stimulation; Olfactory Perception; Chemical detection Systems 1. Introduction to Electrophysiological Techniques and Chemical Perception Neuroimaging techniques allow us to investigate the neuronal mechanisms underlying information processing, and are an indispensable tool in efforts to gain a greater understanding of how
    [Show full text]
  • The Efferent Fibres of the Hippocampus in the Monkey by D
    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1952, 15, 79. THE EFFERENT FIBRES OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS IN THE MONKEY BY D. A. SIMPSON Fr-om the Department ofHuman Anatomv, University of Oxford Speculations upon the functions of the hippo- reviewed in some detail, for they appear to demon- campus have been numerous in the last few years strate significant phylogenetic variations in the and have led to some important experimental destiny of these fibres. studies. In the critical review by Brodal (1947) the obscurity surrounding the afferent connexions of the Material hippocampal complex was stressed. Since the Numerical Examination of Fornix Fibres.-As a publication of this paper, the hippocampal afferents preliminary to a detailed investigation of the destiny of from the cingulate cortex have been examined the fornix fibres, an attempt was made to estimate what experimentally in the rabbit (Adey, 1951) and in proportion of these fibres reach the mamillary body. the monkey (Adey and Meyer, 1952) by Glees' An approximate indication of this may be obtained by silver method, and Pribram, Lennox, and Dunsmore counting and comparing the number of fibres in the (1950) have presented electro-neuronographic experi- fornix before and after the departure of its precommis- ments on the connexions of the entorhinal sural component. and Selected portions of the fornix of a young, healthy prepiriform areas in the macaque. macaque were embedded in paraffin wax, cut trans- The efferent projection of the hippocampus has versely at 5[±, and stained with Bodian's protargol. Two been the subject of some recent experimental levels were examined quantitatively: the fomix beneath studies, notably those of Sprague and Meyer (1950) the corpus callosum, just behind the caudal extremity of on the rabbit, employing the Glees method, and of the septum lucidum, and the descending column of the Allen (1944, 1948) upon the dog, using both the fornix in the hypothalamus (Fig.
    [Show full text]