Neurodynamics and Connectivity During Facial Fear Perception

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neurodynamics and Connectivity During Facial Fear Perception www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception: The role of threat exposure and signal Received: 23 June 2017 Accepted: 9 January 2018 congruity Published: xx xx xxxx Cody A. Cushing1, Hee Yeon Im1,2, Reginald B. Adams Jr.3, Noreen Ward1, Daniel N. Albohn3, Troy G. Steiner3 & Kestutis Kveraga 1,2 Fearful faces convey threat cues whose meaning is contextualized by eye gaze: While averted gaze is congruent with facial fear (both signal avoidance), direct gaze (an approach signal) is incongruent with it. We have previously shown using fMRI that the amygdala is engaged more strongly by fear with averted gaze during brief exposures. However, the amygdala also responds more to fear with direct gaze during longer exposures. Here we examined previously unexplored brain oscillatory responses to characterize the neurodynamics and connectivity during brief (~250 ms) and longer (~883 ms) exposures of fearful faces with direct or averted eye gaze. We performed two experiments: one replicating the exposure time by gaze direction interaction in fMRI (N = 23), and another where we confrmed greater early phase locking to averted-gaze fear (congruent threat signal) with MEG (N = 60) in a network of face processing regions, regardless of exposure duration. Phase locking to direct-gaze fear (incongruent threat signal) then increased signifcantly for brief exposures at ~350 ms, and at ~700 ms for longer exposures. Our results characterize the stages of congruent and incongruent facial threat signal processing and show that stimulus exposure strongly afects the onset and duration of these stages. When we look at a face, we can glean a wealth of information, such as age, sex, health, afective state, and atten- tional focus. Te latter two signals are typically, but not exclusively, carried by emotional expression and eye gaze direction, respectively. Depending on the emotional expression and gaze, we can recognize how happy, angry, or fearful a person is, and infer the source or target of that emotion1. In an initial examination of the interaction between eye gaze and facial emotion, Adams and colleagues introduced the “shared signal hypoth- esis”2–4. Tis hypothesis predicts that there is facilitation of afective processing for combinations of emotional expression and eye gaze that share a congruent, matching signal for approach-avoidance behavior. In support of this hypothesis, using speeded reaction time tasks and self-reported intensity of emotion perceived, Adams and Kleck3,4 found that direct gaze facilitated processing efciency and accuracy, and increased the perceived emotional intensity of approach-oriented emotions (e.g., anger and joy). Conversely, averted gaze facilitated per- ception of avoidance-oriented emotions (e.g., fear and sadness). Several other groups have now also found similar results, including a replication by Sander et al.5 using dynamic threat displays, another using a difusion model of decision making and reaction time6, and another examining efects on refexive orienting to threat7. Perhaps the most compelling behavioral replication of this efect was a study by Milders and colleagues8, who found that direct-gaze anger and averted-gaze fear were detected more readily in an attentional blink paradigm compared to averted-gaze anger and direct-gaze fear, suggesting that congruent pairings (i.e., shared signals) of gaze and emo- tion attract more preconscious attentional awareness. Similar interaction efects have been found at the neural level as well, including in several fMRI studies looking at amygdala responses to diferent gaze directions by threat displays, including our own (see too9–11). Some have also suggested that gaze influences the ambiguity surrounding the source of threat. Whalen and colleagues, for instance, hypothesized that amygdala activation is directly proportional to the amount of 1Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA. 2Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.K. (email: [email protected]) SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | (2018) 8:2776 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20509-8 1 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ ambiguity that surrounds the source of a perceived threat12, which suggests that direct-gaze fear is a more ambig- uous signal than direct-gaze anger. Anger signals both the source of the threat and where it is directed. In the case of fear, the observer knows there is a threat, but direct eye gaze does not indicate the source of the threat - unless it is the observer. Tus, averted eye gaze is more informative in resolving the source of threat for fear, and direct gaze is more informative for anger. In both of these accounts of threat-related ambiguity (shared signals and source of threat detection), direct-gaze fear is considered a more ambiguous combination of cues than averted-gaze fear. Initial eforts to study the neural underpinnings of the perception of these compound threat cues revealed greater amygdala activation in response to incongruent compound threat cues, specifcally fearful faces with a direct gaze and anger faces with averted gaze13,14. Some follow-up studies, however, have found the opposite inter- action: fear with averted eye gaze evoked higher amygdala activation9,10. To address this, Adams et al.15 proposed that presentation duration might help explain these diferences. We hypothesized that brief presentations trigger more refexive processing, which is thought to be preferentially tuned to congruent threat cues (averted-gaze fear), and longer presentations engage more refective processing of the less salient, incongruent threat cues (direct-gaze fear, see e.g.16–18 for discussions of refexive vs. refective processing). Indeed, previous studies fnding stronger amygdala activation in response to averted-gaze fear used relatively brief stimulus exposure times (e.g.9 used 300 ms stimulus durations), whereas those reporting higher amygdala activation in response to direct-gaze fear had longer stimulus exposure times (e.g.,14,19 used 2 s and 1 s stimulus durations, respectively). Adams et al.15 put this hypothesis to the test in the context of three studies using fMRI, with varying presentation parameters during a constant 1.5 s trial. In a direct comparison, this work revealed that amygdala responses were enhanced for fear- ful faces coupled with averted gaze, when rapidly presented (300 ms), and to fearful faces coupled with direct eye gaze, when presented for a sustained duration (1 s). The Current Work The primary goal of the present study was to elucidate the fine-grained neural dynamics of this previously observed response by replicating and extending this work using magnetoencephalography (MEG) to record neu- ral activity in response to brief (250 ms) and longer (883 ms) presentations of fearful faces with direct and averted gaze. MEG allows us to elucidate not only the temporal evolution of neural activity, but also frequency-specifc oscillatory activity in response to the stimulus, including highly temporally resolved interregional connectivity patterns during perception of these compound threat cues from the face. We utilized source localization to obtain good spatial resolution to identify the temporally sensitive contributions of key brain regions in the extended face processing network: the Fusiform Face Area (FFA), Periamygdaloid Cortex (PAC), posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), as well as the earliest cortical visual region V1. Tese regions are well known to be involved in either face perception and social communication, or gaze perception, if not both (e.g.,20–24). STS in general has been shown to be sensitive to gaze25, as has the fusiform gyrus26. In addition, both have been shown to be sensitive to facial expression27. Te STS and OFC are also implicated as nodes in the proposed “social brain” consisting of amygdala, OFC, and STS28. Te posterior portion of STS also has been implicated as specializing in inferring intentionality from social cues29,30. Whether or not amygdala activity can be source localized from MEG data is actively debated in the MEG literature. However, there is accumulating evi- dence now that MEG activity can indeed be localized to the subcortical nuclei of the amygdala31–35, but support- ing or advancing this claim is not the goal of our manuscript. Periamygdaloid cortex (PAC) is heavily involved in conveying inputs and outputs of the deeper amygdala nuclei, the contralateral PAC, as well many other cortical regions36,37. While we cannot be certain which of the amygdala nuclei the activity is coming from (a situation similar to all but the highest resolution fMRI studies), given the reliable activation of the amygdala in all of the previous studies using this paradigm it is probable that at least some of the activity may arise in the subcortical nuclei of the amygdala. To truly understand how a network of brain regions responds to a given task, it is necessary to not only look at the response of each region individually, but to also examine how the regions interact38. Tus, we sought to characterize the phase locking between regions in the present work as a measure of functional connectivity within our extended face processing network. Tis approach allows us to build a more complete picture of the neurody- namics at
Recommended publications
  • Anatomy of the Temporal Lobe
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Epilepsy Research and Treatment Volume 2012, Article ID 176157, 12 pages doi:10.1155/2012/176157 Review Article AnatomyoftheTemporalLobe J. A. Kiernan Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1 Correspondence should be addressed to J. A. Kiernan, [email protected] Received 6 October 2011; Accepted 3 December 2011 Academic Editor: Seyed M. Mirsattari Copyright © 2012 J. A. Kiernan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Only primates have temporal lobes, which are largest in man, accommodating 17% of the cerebral cortex and including areas with auditory, olfactory, vestibular, visual and linguistic functions. The hippocampal formation, on the medial side of the lobe, includes the parahippocampal gyrus, subiculum, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, and associated white matter, notably the fimbria, whose fibres continue into the fornix. The hippocampus is an inrolled gyrus that bulges into the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle. Association fibres connect all parts of the cerebral cortex with the parahippocampal gyrus and subiculum, which in turn project to the dentate gyrus. The largest efferent projection of the subiculum and hippocampus is through the fornix to the hypothalamus. The choroid fissure, alongside the fimbria, separates the temporal lobe from the optic tract, hypothalamus and midbrain. The amygdala comprises several nuclei on the medial aspect of the temporal lobe, mostly anterior the hippocampus and indenting the tip of the temporal horn. The amygdala receives input from the olfactory bulb and from association cortex for other modalities of sensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissociable Large-Scale Networks Anchored in the Right Anterior Insula Subserve Affective Experience and Attention
    NeuroImage 60 (2012) 1947–1958 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect NeuroImage journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg Dissociable large-scale networks anchored in the right anterior insula subserve affective experience and attention Alexandra Touroutoglou a,b, Mark Hollenbeck a,b,c, Bradford C. Dickerson a,b,c,1, Lisa Feldman Barrett a,b,d,1,⁎ a Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA b Psychiatric Neuroimaging Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA c Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA d Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA article info abstract Article history: Meta-analytic summaries of neuroimaging studies point to at least two major functional-anatomic subdivi- Received 12 November 2011 sions within the anterior insula that contribute to the detection and processing of salient information: a dor- Revised 25 January 2012 sal region that is routinely active during attention tasks and a ventral region that is routinely active during Accepted 4 February 2012 affective experience. In two independent samples of cognitively normal human adults, we used intrinsic Available online 13 February 2012 functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging to demonstrate that the right dorsal and right ventral anterior insula are nodes in separable large-scale functional networks. Furthermore, stronger intrinsic con- Keywords: Dorsal anterior insula nectivity within the right dorsal anterior insula network was associated with better performance on a task Ventral anterior insula involving attention and processing speed whereas stronger connectivity within the right ventral anterior Intrinsic functional connectivity insula network was associated with more intense affective experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemosensory Perception: a Review on Electrophysiological Methods in “Cognitive Neuro-Olfactometry”
    chemosensors Review Chemosensory Perception: A Review on Electrophysiological Methods in “Cognitive Neuro-Olfactometry” Sara Invitto * and Alberto Grasso INSPIRE Laboratory of Cognitive and Psychophysiological Olfactory Processes, DiSTeBA, University of Salento and DrEAM Vito Fazzi Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 August 2019; Accepted: 10 September 2019; Published: 12 September 2019 Abstract: Various brain imaging techniques are available, but few are specifically designed to visualize chemical sensory and, in particular, olfactory processing. This review describes the results of quantitative and qualitative studies that have used electroencephalography (EEG) and magneto-encephalography (MEG) to evaluate responses to olfactory stimulation (OS). EEG and MEG are able to detect the components of chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERPs) and the cortical rhythms associated with different types of OS. Olfactory studies are filling the gaps in both the developmental field of the life cycle (from newborns to geriatric age) and the clinical and basic research fields, in a way that can be considered the modern “cognitive neuro-olfactometry”. Keywords: EEG; OERP; CSERP; olfactory stimulation; olfactory perception; chemical detection systems 1. Introduction to Electrophysiological Techniques and Chemical Perception Neuroimaging techniques allow us to investigate the neuronal mechanisms underlying information processing, and are an indispensable tool in efforts to gain a greater understanding
    [Show full text]
  • Distinct Hippocampal Functional Networks Revealed by Tractography-Based Parcellation
    Brain Struct Funct DOI 10.1007/s00429-015-1084-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Distinct hippocampal functional networks revealed by tractography-based parcellation 1 2,5 3 2,4 Areeba Adnan • Alexander Barnett • Massieh Moayedi • Cornelia McCormick • 2,5 2,5 Melanie Cohn • Mary Pat McAndrews Received: 27 February 2015 / Accepted: 7 July 2015 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Abstract Recent research suggests the anterior and pos- parahippocampal, inferior temporal and fusiform gyri and terior hippocampus form part of two distinct functional the precuneus, predicted interindividual relational memory neural networks. Here we investigate the structural under- performance. These findings provide important support for pinnings of this functional connectivity difference using the integration of structural and functional connectivity in diffusion-weighted imaging-based parcellation. Using this understanding the brain networks underlying episodic technique, we substantiated that the hippocampus can be memory. parcellated into distinct anterior and posterior segments. These structurally defined segments did indeed show dif- Keywords DTI Á fMRI Á Hippocampus Á Recognition ferent patterns of resting state functional connectivity, in that memory Á Networks the anterior segment showed greater connectivity with temporal and orbitofrontal cortex, whereas the posterior segment was more highly connected to medial and lateral Introduction parietal cortex. Furthermore, we showed that the posterior hippocampal connectivity to memory processing regions, There is a growing consensus for the specialization of hip- including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, pocampal function along the anterior–posterior axis, arising out of differential involvement in large-scale brain networks (Poppenk et al. 2013). Functional neuroimaging has shown A. Adnan, A. Barnett and M. Moayedi contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Scent of Human Olfactory Orbitofrontal Cortex: Meta-Analysis and Comparison to Non-Human Primates
    Brain Research Reviews 50 (2005) 287 – 304 www.elsevier.com/locate/brainresrev Review On the scent of human olfactory orbitofrontal cortex: Meta-analysis and comparison to non-human primates Jay A. Gottfrieda,*, David H. Zaldb aDepartment of Neurology and the Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 320 E. Superior St., Searle 11-453, Chicago, IL 60611, USA bDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA Accepted 25 August 2005 Available online 6 October 2005 Abstract It is widely accepted that the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) represents the main neocortical target of primary olfactory cortex. In non-human primates, the olfactory neocortex is situated along the basal surface of the caudal frontal lobes, encompassing agranular and dysgranular OFC medially and agranular insula laterally, where this latter structure wraps onto the posterior orbital surface. Direct afferent inputs arrive from most primary olfactory areas, including piriform cortex, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex, in the absence of an obligatory thalamic relay. While such findings are almost exclusively derived from animal data, recent cytoarchitectonic studies indicate a close anatomical correspondence between non-human primate and human OFC. Given this cross-species conservation of structure, it has generally been presumed that the olfactory projection area in human OFC occupies the same posterior portions of OFC as seen in non-human primates. This review questions this assumption by providing a critical survey of the localization of primate and human olfactory neocortex. Based on a meta-analysis of human functional neuroimaging studies, the region of human OFC showing the greatest olfactory responsivity appears substantially rostral and in a different cytoarchitectural area than the orbital olfactory regions as defined in the monkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemosensory Perception: a Review on Electrophysiological Methods in “Cognitive Neuro-Olfactometry”
    Review Chemosensory Perception: A Review on Electrophysiological Methods in “Cognitive Neuro-Olfactometry” Sara Invitto * and Alberto Grasso INSPIRE Laboratory of Cognitive and Psychophysiological Olfactory Processes, DiSTeBA, University of Salento and DrEAM Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce 73100, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 August 2019; Accepted: 10 September 2019; Published: 12 September 2019 Abstract: Various brain imaging techniques are available, but few are specifically designed to visualize chemical sensory and, in particular, olfactory processing. This review describes the results of quantitative and qualitative studies that have used electroencephalography (EEG) and magneto- encephalography (MEG) to evaluate responses to olfactory stimulation (OS). EEG and MEG are able to detect the components of chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERPs) and the cortical rhythms associated with different types of OS. Olfactory studies are filling the gaps in both the developmental field of the life cycle (from newborns to geriatric age) and the clinical and basic research fields, in a way that can be considered the modern “cognitive neuro-olfactometry”. Keywords: EEG; OERP; CSERP; Olfactory Stimulation; Olfactory Perception; Chemical detection Systems 1. Introduction to Electrophysiological Techniques and Chemical Perception Neuroimaging techniques allow us to investigate the neuronal mechanisms underlying information processing, and are an indispensable tool in efforts to gain a greater understanding of how
    [Show full text]
  • The Neuroscience of Emotional Disorders
    Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 183 (3rd series) Disorders of Emotion in Neurologic Disease K.M. Heilman and S.E. Nadeau, Editors https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822290-4.00002-5 Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved Chapter 1 The neuroscience of emotional disorders EDMUND T. ROLLS1,2* 1Oxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience, Oxford, United Kingdom 2Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom Abstract Emotions can be defined as states elicited by rewards or punishments, and indeed the neurology of emotional disorders can be understood in terms of this foundation. The orbitofrontal cortex in humans and other primates is a critical area in emotion processing, determining the value of stimuli and whether they are rewarding or nonrewarding. The cortical processing that occurs before the orbitofrontal cortex primarily involves defining the identity of stimuli, i.e., “what” is present and not reward value. There is evidence that this holds true for taste, visual, somatosensory, and olfactory stimuli. The human medial orbitofrontal cortex is important in processing many different types of reward, and the lateral orbitofrontal cortex in processing nonreward and punishment. Humans with damage to the orbitofrontal cortex have an impaired ability to identify facial and voice expressions of emotions, and impaired subjective experience of emotion. They can have an altered personality and be impulsive because they are impaired at processing failures to receive expected rewards and at processing punishments. In humans, the role of the amygdala in the processing of emotions is reduced because of the great evolutionary development of the orbitofrontal cortex: amygdala damage has much less effect on emotion than does orbitofrontal cortex damage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Development of the Brain As It Pertains to Neurosurgery
    Open Access Original Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6748 The Evolutionary Development of the Brain As It Pertains to Neurosurgery Jaafar Basma 1 , Natalie Guley 2 , L. Madison Michael II 3 , Kenan Arnautovic 3 , Frederick Boop 3 , Jeff Sorenson 3 1. Neurological Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA 2. Neurological Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA 3. Neurological Surgery, Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, USA Corresponding author: Jaafar Basma, [email protected] Abstract Background Neuroanatomists have long been fascinated by the complex topographic organization of the cerebrum. We examined historical and modern phylogenetic theories pertaining to microneurosurgical anatomy and intrinsic brain tumor development. Methods Literature and history related to the study of anatomy, evolution, and tumor predilection of the limbic and paralimbic regions were reviewed. We used vertebrate histological cross-sections, photographs from Albert Rhoton Jr.’s dissections, and original drawings to demonstrate the utility of evolutionary temporal causality in understanding anatomy. Results Phylogenetic neuroanatomy progressed from the substantial works of Alcmaeon, Herophilus, Galen, Vesalius, von Baer, Darwin, Felsenstein, Klingler, MacLean, and many others. We identified two major modern evolutionary theories: “triune brain” and topological phylogenetics. While the concept of “triune brain” is speculative and highly debated, it remains the most popular in the current neurosurgical literature. Phylogenetics inspired by mathematical topology utilizes computational, statistical, and embryological data to analyze the temporal transformations leading to three-dimensional topographic anatomy. These transformations have shaped well-defined surgical planes, which can be exploited by the neurosurgeon to access deep cerebral targets. The microsurgical anatomy of the cerebrum and the limbic system is redescribed by incorporating the dimension of temporal causality.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebecca D. Burwell, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae
    Rebecca D. Burwell, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae Rebecca D. Burwell, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences Brown University [email protected] Professional Appointments: Professor of Psychology (secondary appointment in Neuroscience), Brown University, 2006- present Professor of Neuroscience (secondary appointment), Brown University, 2006-present Associate Professor of Neuroscience (secondary appointment), Brown University, 2003-2006 Associate Professor of Psychology, Brown University, 2002-2006 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Brown University, 1996-2002 Postdoctoral Fellow and Lecturer, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, The State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1993-1996 Postdoctoral Research Associate, Laboratory for Neuronal Structure and Function, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 1992-1993 Education Ph.D., The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1992 Experimental and Biological Psychology Program Thesis title: The Effects of Aging on Brain Dopamine Systems and Behavior M.A., The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1989 Clinical Psychology Program Thesis title: The Relationship Between Age-related Deficits in Spatial Learning and Diurnal Rhythms B.A., Southern Methodist University, 1974 Academic Honors National Merit Scholarship, 1971-1974 University Scholarship, SMU, 1973-1974 James R. Kenan Fellowship, UNC, 08/87-05/88 NSF Predoctoral Fellowship, 06/88-05/91 APA Division 20 Student Research Award, 1991 NIH Predoctoral Fellowship, 06/91-08/92 NIMH Postdoctoral Fellowship, 12/92-11/94 McDonnell-Pew Fellowship to Cold Spring Harbor Biology of Memory Course, Summer 1993 NIMH Postdoctoral Fellowship, 03/95-02/96 Salomon Award: The Postrhinal Cortex and Context Conditioning, 1997-1999 NSF Career Development Award: Cognitive Functions of the Postrhinal Cortex, 1999-2003 Karen T.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 7 Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    AREA 7 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Matthew Reilly | 512 pages | 17 Feb 2003 | St Martin's Press | 9780312983222 | English | New York, United States Area 7 PDF Book Schofield gets back to Area 7, but the prisoners that were there for scientific research get out, and make the remaining Air Force and Marines fight to the death. Return to Play Activities Waiver. Apr 30, Alex rated it it was amazing Shelves: in Original Title. Please reference the Developmental Disabilities Services Coverage and Limitations Handbook for more details on services offered under this program. Friday 9 October Forever glad the bears survived. Thursday 20 August Bellingham Bay Fishery see 1 below for boundaries Aug. This is the second book I've read by Matthew Reilly and just like Ice Station the first book in the Scarecrow series it's an action packed read from start to finish! Most of these people die. Melbourne , Victoria , Australia. Monday 29 June Parahippocampal gyrus anterior Entorhinal cortex Perirhinal cortex Postrhinal cortex Posterior parahippocampal gyrus Prepyriform area. Friday 29 May And in the process, he wrote a story that definitely gave me something to worry about. Shane Schofield 4 books. Why, because they have access to many of the installations containing some of this countries greatest tactical assets: high tech planes and ballistic missiles. Area 7 Shane Schofield 2 by Matthew Reilly. For smelt: Jig gear may be used 7 days a week. Sunday 5 July Visual cortex 17 Cuneus Lingual gyrus Calcarine sulcus. Trump trailing behind Biden in funding, weeks before Election Day, new filings show. This book SHOULD be read only if you are waiting in the airport to catch a long-delayed flight, or while pursuing some other similar pursuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Smell Danger: Acquired Associative Representation of Threat in the Olfactory Cortex
    MINI REVIEW ARTICLE published: 07 April 2014 BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00098 Learning to smell danger: acquired associative representation of threat in the olfactory cortex Wen Li 1,2* 1 Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA 2 Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Edited by: Neuroscience research over the past few decades has reached a strong consensus Anne-Marie Mouly, Centre de that the amygdala plays a key role in emotion processing. However, many questions Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, remain unanswered, especially concerning emotion perception. Based on mnemonic France theories of olfactory perception and in light of the highly associative nature of olfactory Reviewed by: Jonas K. Olofsson, Stockholm cortical processing, here I propose a sensory cortical model of olfactory threat perception University, Sweden (i.e., sensory-cortex-based threat perception): the olfactory cortex stores threat codes Tyler Lorig, Washington and Lee as acquired associative representations (AARs) formed via aversive life experiences, University, USA thereby enabling encoding of threat cues during sensory processing. Rodent and human *Correspondence: research in olfactory aversive conditioning was reviewed, indicating learning-induced Wen Li, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, plasticity in the amygdala and the olfactory piriform cortex. In addition, as aversive learning Brogden Hall, 1202 W. Johnson becomes consolidated in the amygdala, the associative olfactory (piriform) cortex may Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA undergo (long-term) plastic changes, resulting in modified neural response patterns that e-mail: [email protected] underpin threat AARs. This proposal thus brings forward a sensory cortical pathway to threat processing (in addition to amygdala-based processes), potentially accounting for an alternative mechanism underlying the pathophysiology of anxiety and depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Connections of Inferior Temporal Areas TE and TEO with Medial Temporal-Lobe Structures in Infant and Adult Monkeys
    The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1991, 17(4): 1095-I 116 Connections of Inferior Temporal Areas TE and TEO with Medial Temporal-Lobe Structures in Infant and Adult Monkeys M. J. Webster, L. G. Ungerleider, and J. Bachevalier Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 As part of a long-term study designed to examine the on- tion. Both elimination and refinement of projections thus ap- togeny of visual memory in monkeys and its underlying neu- pear to characterize the maturation of axonal pathways be- ral circuitry, we have examined the connections between tween the inferior temporal cortex and medial temporal-lobe inferior temporal cortex and medial temporal-lobe structures structures in monkeys. in infant and adult monkeys. Inferior temporal cortical areas TEO and TE were injected with WGA conjugated to HRP and In the course of neural development, numerous mechanisms tritiated amino acids, respectively, or vice versa, in 1 -week- are at play to achieve the final configuration of the mature brain. old and 3-4-yr-old Macaca mulatta, and the distributions of These mechanismsinclude cell death, the growth of dendritic labeled cells and terminals were examined in both limbic spines,and the remodeling of connections. Such remodeling can structures and temporal-lobe cortical areas. In adult mon- take 2 forms. In the first instance, projections become more keys, inferior temporal-limbic connections included projec- restricted. That is, they initially terminate in the appropriate tions from area TEO to the dorsal portion of the lateral nu- area of the brain, but their target fields are considerably more cleus of the amygdala and from area TE to the lateral and widespreadin infancy than they will be later in adulthood.
    [Show full text]