A Documentation and Description of Yelmek and Maklew
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A Documentation and Description of Yelmek Tina Gregor A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University July 2020 © Copyright Tina Gregor This thesis represents an original piece of work, and does not contain, in part or in full, the published work of any other individual, except where acknowledged. Tina Gregor July 2020 Abstract Yelmek is a small endangered language spoken in the south-west of New Guinea. It is a member of the Yelmek-Maklew family, a maximal clade family, comprising 4 languages. The whole language family has less than a thousand fluent speakers by my estimation. The present work is the first in-depth description of any language of this family. It is based on a total oftwelve months of original fieldwork. In some ways, Yelmek is typical for a language of Southern New Guinea. Its verbal mor- phology is exceedingly complex, while having a relatively flat syntactic structure. In other ways, it is very different, not just compared to languages of the region, but also toothers anywhere in the world. Its most striking grammatical feature, typologically speaking, is the suppletion for gender in the verbal paradigm. Yelmek distinguishes two genders, masculine and feminine, which align with biological sex but are also assigned to inanimate objects. The only agreement target for gender is the verb. This in itself is typologically rare. On the verb, the gender of both the subject and the direct object is indexed. The subject indexing (both for intransitive and transitive clauses) uses affixes and pre-verbal particles for gender marking, but the object indexing expresses gender by stem change. The morphological nature of the stem change depends on the verb and ranges from vowel change to full suppletion. This thesis is structured in a traditional way for a grammar. The first chapter introduces the speaker and the language situation. The second chapter talks in more detail about the linguistic classification and the internal relations of the Yelmek and Maklew varieties towards eachother. The actual language description starts in Chapter 3 with a discussion of phonemes and other phonological issues. The next chapter, Chapter 4, introduces and discusses the different parts of speech in Yelmek. Chapter 5 and 6 are dedicated to nominal morphology, whereas Chapters 7, 8 and 9 discuss different aspects of the verbal morphology. The last three chapters are dedicated to clausal structure. i ii ABSTRACT Acknowledgments You know that you live in a truly interconnected world when you meet your first speaker of a tiny Papuan language in a city in Germany. And you meet them because Papuans have their own Facebook group (of people from Papua in Leipzig). I am forever grateful to Delfina Tebay for putting my search for speakers of Yelmek-Maklew into this group, despite me having serious doubts about the likelihood of success. But there he was: Marselino Gebze who introduced me to his family in Merauke and everything else went from there. I owe a special debt of gratitude to the Yelmek people who welcomed me into their midst, sheltered, protected and fed me, as well as indulged my hundreds and hundreds of questions. Thanks to the authority if Johannes Gluba Gebze (Marselino’s uncle), we started off on a good foot. He gave the project his blessing and encouraged his people to work with me. Special thanks go to Yunita Gebze and Eko Wibowo who hosted me in Merauke during three trips and the Wibowo family for hosting me during the last trip. I am not sure I would have been able to navigate the local Indonesian bureaucracy without you. My hosts in Wanam, who were also stellar language consultants, Ambrosia Kahol and Kasimirus Gebze as well as Antoneta Kahol and Cely Moiwen also deserve special mention. Not only did they provide food and shelter, they were also very generous with their time and in advocate my work to their people. I would have recorded a lot less without their support. I am also immensely grateful to Liberata Gebze, Serafinus Gebze and Weren Kahol who acted as my primary consultants during different trips. Not only did they spend considerable time working with me, they also went to great length to facilitate for me to work with others. I was also truly blessed with transcribers who I could hand a computer with prepared ELAN files. Not only would they bring back the laptop intact, but also had transcribed the files. Most noticeable in this group are Liberata Gebze and Serafinus Gebze who did the bulk of the transcribing, but also enlisted their friends to help them. A big thank you to all the people who contributed recordings, helped transcribing or simply spread goodwill. On the academic side, I want to thank first and foremost my two supervisors I Wayan Arka and Nicholas Evans for giving me this opportunity and for all their support throughout this iii iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS journey. You are an inspiration to work with, and I learned so much. My heartfelt thanks also goes to all other advisors on my panel, who helped me at different stages of the project and read different version chapters: Matthew Carroll, Hannah Sarvasy, Don Daniels and Volker Gast. Further, I want to thank Siva Kalyan for help with Latex problems, to Simón Gonzalez Ochoa for preparing the forced-alignment data, to Karina Pelling form CartoGis for the wonderful maps, to Mark Ellison for help with R scripts and plots and Zurab Baratashvili for hunting up books I couldn’t get from the library. Thanks also to the ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language and the Wurm fund for generously funding my project. Being part of the ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Languages was an amaz- ing experience. It provided a truly stimulating environment to work in and facilitated meeting countless interesting and inspiring people who influenced my work in so many ways. I always felt supported, not only by the researchers around me, but also by the admin team, in particu- larly Joanne Allen and Romina Paskotic within CoEDL, as well as Jo Bushby and Etsuko Mason in CHL. Thank you all, for helping to overcome the practical hurdles that are involved in doing a PhD. I also want to acknowledge the support of the Center for Endangered Languages Doc- umentation at the Universitas Papua in Manokwari. In particular Yusuf Sawaki and Jeanete Lekeneny who provided supporting letters for visas to Indonesia among other things. Thanks also to Albert Fiharsono for providing supporting letters. Doing a PhD can be a lonely journey, but for me it never was thanks to the many people who were colleagues as well as friends, friends as well as colleagues or just friends of course. A big shout out to all of you for long walks, long talks, plenty of board game nights and lots of coffees. To name just a few in no particular order: Eri Kashima, Julia Miller, Alex Marley, James Bednell, Claudia Cialone, Uta Reinöl, Marie-France Duhamel, Hedvig Skirgård, Dineke Schokkin, Mark Ellison, Siva Kalyan, Naijing Liu. Finally, to my family who always supported me and held on to their belief that there was a point to me going to the other side of the world and spending years on something this obscure. And to Louie Lester Yao, who has been my home and my heart. Without you my love this last stretch would have been unbearable, and I am not sure how long I would have survived on just coffee and chocolate. Oh and to my dog Phryne, who encouraged me to sit quietly onmydesk so she could sleep on my lap. Contents Abstract i Acknowledgments iii List of figures xiii List of tables xvii List of abbreviations xix 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 The Yelmek and Maklew People .......................... 1 1.1.1 Geographic situation ............................ 1 1.1.2 Historical and political situation ...................... 4 1.1.3 Clans and kinship .............................. 8 1.1.4 Language situation ............................. 11 1.2 Existing data ..................................... 12 1.3 Methods and language corpus ........................... 12 1.4 Typological profile of Wanam Yelmek ....................... 18 1.5 Thesis outline .................................... 19 2 The Yelmek and Maklew languages 21 2.1 Linguistic classification ............................... 21 2.2 Lexical comparison within Yelmek-Maklew .................... 23 2.2.1 Comparison overall ............................. 24 2.2.2 Pronoun sets ................................ 26 2.2.3 Numerals .................................. 27 2.2.4 Sound correspondences .......................... 28 v vi CONTENTS 2.2.5 Conclusion for the lexical comparison .................. 32 3 Phonology 35 3.1 Overview ....................................... 35 3.2 Yelmek’s phoneme inventory in context ...................... 36 3.3 Vowels ........................................ 38 3.3.1 Monophthongs ............................... 38 3.3.2 Vowel sequences .............................. 48 3.3.3 Vowel lengthening ............................. 49 3.4 Consonants ...................................... 50 3.4.1 Plosives ................................... 51 3.4.2 Nasals .................................... 55 3.4.3 Fricatives .................................. 55 3.4.4 Laterals ................................... 56 3.4.5 Approximants ................................ 56 3.4.6 Consonant clusters and epenthetic schwa ................ 57 3.5 Morphophonemics .................................. 61 3.6 Prosody ........................................ 62 3.6.1 Stress .................................... 62 3.6.2 Intonation