Preliminary Injunctions in Non-Compete Cases

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Injunctions in Non-Compete Cases G THE B IN EN V C R H E S A N 8 8 D 8 B 1 AR SINCE WWW. NYLJ.COM ©2009 INCISIVE MEDIA US PROPERTIES, LLC VOLUME 242—NO. 65 THURSDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2009 SOUTHERN DISTRICT CIVIL PRACTICE ROUNDUP Expert Analysis Preliminary Injunctions In Non-Compete Cases or employees who possess confiden- The Second Circuit has not yet sought to tial business information, the threat re-tool the longstanding standard operative of a preliminary injunction can make in this circuit for entry of a preliminary Fchanging jobs a highrisk proposition. injunction,7 and we do not read Winter as To prevent, or at least forestall, the loss of overruling the Second Circuit’s approach. confidential information to the competi- We do note, however, that Winter could be tion, employers occasionally seek prelimi- read to require consideration of the private nary injunctions, regarded as “one of the By ByAnd equities as well as the public interest in most drastic tools in the arsenal of judicial HowardEdward M.B. TheodoreJudith L. A. every case, including where the plaintiff remedies,”1 to enjoin departing employees EpsteinSpiro KeyesMogul has established both irreparable injury from working for competitors. The decision and a likelihood of success on the merits. whether to grant such relief generally turns A party must demonstrate either (1) a likeli- Many cases already consider these factors, on resolution of the tension between pro- hood of success on the merits of its claim or and thus, as a practical matter, Winter is tecting proprietary business information (2) “sufficiently serious” questions making unlikely to result in a significant change in on the one hand, and the strong public the merits “fair ground for litigation” plus Second Circuit law. policy against limiting competition and an a balance of hardships “tipping decidedly” 3 individual’s ability to work on the other. in the movant’s favor. Employer-Employee Cases As a number of recent decisions from The Supreme Court’s decision last year in the U.S. District Court for the Southern Dis- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council4 In non-compete cases, because an trict of New York illustrate, employers and may introduce a new gloss on this long- employer’s entitlement to an injunction employees alike can take steps before and established Second Circuit standard. The ultimately turns on whether it can show during litigation that may influence how the standard as articulated in Winter requires that the former employee is likely to reveal balance between these competing interests a plaintiff to show that “he is likely to suc- confidential business information, “the will be struck. ceed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm analysis and the likeli- hood of success on the merits analysis are 8 Legal Standard closely related and often conflated.” Courts focus heavily on the nature At each stage of the inquiry, courts focus In the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sec- of the information at stake and heavily on the nature of the information at ond Circuit, a party seeking a preliminary evidence indicating whether an stake and evidence indicating whether an injunction must establish the likelihood employee is likely intentionally, or employee is likely intentionally, or even of irreparable injury in the absence of an even unintentionally, to reveal that unintentionally, to reveal that information. injunction. The risk of irreparable injury information. They also give significant weight to whether must be actual and imminent rather than there is an effective non-compete contract remote or speculative.2 Once the prereq- irreparable harm in the absence of prelimi- between the parties. Three recent Southern uisite of irreparable injury is met, the Sec- nary relief, that the balance of equities tips District cases, reaching different conclu- ond Circuit charts two alternative avenues in his favor, and that an injunction is in the sions as to whether a departing employee for obtaining preliminary injunctive relief. public interest.”5 According to one commen- should be enjoined from working for a com- tator, this formulation calls into question petitor, illustrate the significance of these EDWARD M. SPIRO and JUDITH L. MOGUL are princi- the Second Circuit’s “second avenue” for factors. pals of Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & obtaining a preliminary injunction absent Bohrer, both concentrating in commercial litigation. a likelihood of success on the merits, where Mr. Spiro is co-author of “Civil Practice in the Southern ‘IBM v. Papermaster’ there are only serious questions going to the District of New York,” 2d Ed. (Thomson West 2008). GRETCHAN R. OHLIG, an attorney, assisted in the merits plus a balance of hardships decidedly In International Business Machines preparation of this article. favoring the moving party.6 Corp. v. Papermaster,9 IBM succeeded THURSDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2009 in enjoining Mark Papermaster, a former Judge Karas’ finding of irreparable harm not outweigh the harm Mr. Johnson would executive with extensive knowledge of IBM was bolstered by the fact that Mr. Papermaster suffer if forced to stay on the sidelines of technology, from working for Apple Inc. had signed a non-competition agreement a rapidly changing field.14 Mr. Papermaster, an expert in microproces- expressly acknowledging that IBM would What also distinguished Johnson from sors, had worked at IBM for 26 years in a suffer irreparable harm if he violated it. Papermaster was the fact that Mr. Johnson senior capacity, and was a member of an Recognizing that such a contract does not had avoided properly signing a non- elite group of IBM executives that developed per se entitle the employer to a finding of competition agreement despite IBM’s corporate strategy. He had access to highly irreparable harm, Judge Karas neverthe- repeated attempts to get him to do so. In an confidential technical information as well less concluded that the agreement’s explicit effort to delay entering into the agreement, as information regarding strategic plans, provision and common sense contributed Mr. Johnson had initially signed in the space product development and longterm busi- to making the finding of irreparable harm provided for the company’s signature, and ness opportunities. He was hired by Apple more than mere speculation in that case. thereafter ignored requests to execute a new to be a senior vice president responsible version of the document in the correct place. for the iPod and iPhone products. ‘IBM v. Johnson’ Judge Robinson found that IBM faced a In granting IBM’s request for a prelimi- “daunting, if not insurmountable, task” in nary injunction, Southern District Judge Southern District Judge Stephen C. proving that Mr. Johnson was bound by the Kenneth M. Karas noted that a determina- ­Robinson’s decision to deny the requested tion of irreparable harm requires more than injunction in International Business Machines The preliminary injunction is a potent 12 the mere showing that the employee is in Corp. v. Johnson also turned in substantial weapon that courts are hesitant to un- possession of confidential business infor- measure on the nature of the information mation. IBM also would have to show either possessed by the departing employee and leash against former employees absent that the employee had misappropriated the the risk of harm to his former employer clear evidence that the new employ- information or that his new employment (again IBM) posed by its potential disclo- ment poses a real risk that confidential “create[d] a risk that disclosure of this sure. (Interestingly, the court considered information will be divulged. information [was] inevitable.” this issue in the context of the balance of Judge Karas found no evidence that hardships inquiry, underscoring the extent non-compete agreement, and that, accord- Mr. Papermaster actually had misappropri- to which the various prongs of the prelimi- ingly, IBM had not established a likelihood ated IBM’s trade secrets, but did conclude nary injunction standard ultimately turn of success on the merits of its breach of that he would inevitably disclose secrets he on similar factors). contract claim.15 Had Mr. Johnson properly did possess to Apple. In reaching that con- In Johnson, IBM sought to prevent David signed the agreement the court may well clusion, Judge Karas applied a four-factor Johnson, its former vice president of cor- have reached a different conclusion on test considering: (1) the extent to which porate development, from moving to its the ultimate question of whether to enjoin the new employer is a direct competitor competitor, Dell Inc. Like the defendant in Mr. Johnson’s move to Dell. of the former employer; (2) whether the Papermaster, Mr. Johnson was a member of employee’s new position is nearly identical the elite management group privy to con- ‘American Airlines v. Imhof’ to his old one; (3) the extent to which the fidential strategic initiatives. IBM claimed trade secrets at issue would have value to that Mr. Johnson was aware of confidential, The employee-defendant also prevailed his new employer; and (4) the nature of the competitive information concerning IBM’s in American Airlines Inc. v. Imhof,16 where industry and its trade secrets.10 clients’ needs, its competitors’ strategies, Southern District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan Judge Karas held that Mr. Papermaster and its own strategies for carrying out busi- refused to find that the departing employee had been “inculcated” with some of IBM’s ness opportunities. would inevitably disclose confidential infor- most valuable technical and strategic Acknowledging that IBM faced some risk mation to his new employer, despite the secrets and that it was inevitable that he from disclosure of this information, Judge fact that he had clearly misappropriated would use his IBM experience and expertise Robinson found that IBM nevertheless had information in anticipation of switching in his new position with an IBM competitor.
Recommended publications
  • Fenwick Employment Brief
    Fenwick Employment Brief December 10, 2008 Victor Schachter Editor 650.335.7905 Mary Wang Contributor 650.335.7154 planning a workforce reduction: a brief checklist In current economic times, more and more companies are turning to “reductions in force” or “RIFs.” While RIFs can provide both short and long-term economic benefits, they are also among the most difficult events an attorney or human resources professional must oversee because of the emotional and economic impact they will have on employees, the myriad of complex laws that must be observed, and the enormous amount of work that is usually required in a very short amount of time. Thoughtful and careful planning is important not only to ensure compliance with legal requirements, but also help to minimize the adverse effects of a workforce reduction, further reducing the risk of lawsuits. The following checklist provides some practical guidance to assist employers in implementing a reduction in force and to minimize legal risks. This checklist does not address all the possible issues arising from a RIF and we encourage you to consult with counsel as part of your planning and implementation of a RIF. planning and construction of a layoff n Identify triggering events for layoff n Identify possible layoff alternatives (e.g., pay cuts, schedule reductions, temporary shutdowns and vacation/PTO drawdown, reduction of contractor headcount) n Identify affected sites and estimate number of affected employees for WARN and other analyses n Establish the RIF management team: Identify the individuals
    [Show full text]
  • PART I: People & Strategy
    By Ken Luskin [email protected] October 28, 2014 PART I: People & Strategy The Brilliance of Steve Jobs was in building a team of geniuses Virtually everyone in the world knows that Steve Jobs was the driving force behind the success of Apple. Unfortunately, few of them understand that without the team of technical gurus Jobs assembled, his visions would not have become reality. Without a Microprocessor Brain, the iPhone would not exist Inside every “smart” computing device is a microprocessor, considered the brains of the device. When Jobs was creating what is now known as the iPhone, he needed a special microprocessor, which could make it through the day without draining the battery. Jobs first approached Intel, the company that was supplying the microprocessors for the entire MAC line. Intel was not interested in supplying a relatively low cost mobile chip, because the bean counters and FAB guys had no vision. So, Jobs built a team of top mobile microproprocessor engineers, licensed the ARM architecture, and created a chip that became the brains of the iPhone and iPad. Apple buys P.A. Semiconductor in 2008 to keep Apple’s microprocessors on the cutting edge With this acquisition Apple received a group of highly innovative engineers, including ex AMD employee Jim Keller. From a VentureBeat article: “Keller spearheaded the development of Apple’s custom mobile processors — including the A4 in the iPhone 4, the A5 in the iPhone 4S and iPad 2, and the A5X in the new iPad — all of which have managed to keep Apple’s mobile devices on the cutting edge.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple: Iphone 4´S Antennagate
    Corporate Communication Master of International Trade, Transport and Communication University of Cantabria Apple: iPhone 4´s Antennagate The launch of the new iPhone 4 from Apple caused a huge stir all over the world, particularly in the United States in June 2010. The features improvement of the new smartphone went into the background when signal problems were detected. The simple answer that the company gave to their clients only increased the controversy. Finally, Apple had to apologize in public and compensate their customers. Apple Inc. Apple Inc. is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Cupertino, California, that designs, develops, and sells consumer electronics, computer software and personal computers. The company was founded on April 1, 1976, by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak and Ronald Wayne to sell a personal computer kit called Apple I, a computer unassisted designed by Wozniak. Since then, Apple has suffered many changes and currently it is the world's second-largest information technology company by revenue after Samsung Electronics and the world's third-largest mobile phone maker after Samsung and Nokia1. Fortune magazine named Apple the most admired company in the United States in 2008, and in the world from 2008 to 2012. Apple's marketing strategy is powerful and has made them the success story they are. They use unique marketing techniques as understanding and serving the customer better than anyone else, making sure every little thing serves always and everywhere. Apple is not limited to cover only the need of customers, they also are capable of creating demand with innovating products that does not exist on market.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilounge 2010 Buyers' Guide
    ©2012 SwitchEasy Limited, All Rights Reserved. U.S. and International Patents pending. iPhone5 is registered trademarks of Apple Computer Inc. 2013 Welcome to the Guide. IPHONE + IPOD BUYERS’ GUIDE After a slow and uneven 2011, Apple roared back in 2012, launching a wide array of significantly redesigned devices. The iPod, iPhone, and iPad families all saw major screen revisions, including two taller iPods, one elongated iPhone, and a quadrupled-resolution iPad. Then, just before the holidays, Apple debuted the 7.9” iPad mini, and replaced the 9.7” iPad again - just because it could. Going into 2013, the lineup looks almost completely different than it did a year earlier, except for three iPods that have been left largely untouched. If you’re reading this Guide, you’re probably looking for buying advice, and that’s why we’re here - to give you an impartial and honest look at the world of Apple devices, accessories, apps, and games. Following our tradition, iLounge’s editors have spent the past year testing hundreds of new products, selecting the best and most noteworthy ones for our new 2013 iPhone + iPod Buyers Guide. Independently assembled, our Guide is a sight to behold. We hope you enjoy it. The 2013 iPhone + iPod Buyers’ Guide is published by iLounge, Inc. and is Copyright © 2004-2012. All rights reserved. No part of this guide may be reproduced, sold, rented, or transmitted in any form, or by any means whatsoever, without the prior written consent of the publisher. Unauthorized sale of this guide is prohibited, and by accessing this guide, you agree not to violate these restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • POWER SHIFT 2 Cloud Services New Partnership Deals This Year Marked a Shift in Power in Mobile
    BUSINESS ANALYSIS For TELECOMS proFESSioNALS DEC 2010–JAN 2011 LEADER CONTENTS NETWORK STRATEGIES POWER SHIFT 2 Cloud services New partnership deals This year marked a shift in power in mobile. We look at 2010 show telcos are raising the stakes to provide cloud highlights as well as cloud services and fibre business models services to enterprises. TECHnoLogY TRENDS his has been the year when September it sold its 3.2% stake in merger and acquisition China Mobile for £4.3 billion and 6 Policy Tactivity sprung back to life with barely a whisper in November management in the telecoms and ICT sectors. offloaded its interests in Japan’s Mobile operators needing M&A activity accelerated as the Softbank for £3.1 billion. to better manage data year drew to a close as we showed in In mobile, at least, the global traffic flow and improve the last issue of Total Telecom Plus. balance of power is shifting towards service quality are looking to policy management. It is in the mobile sector where the BRIC countries and the Middle Ian Kemp Editor the biggest upheaval is playing out. East. That is sure to be reflected in OPerator RANKING Total Telecom Plus Bharti Airtel in April moved up to Total Telecom’s Global 100 ranking of 8 Global 100 the number five spot among global fixed and mobile network operators An extract from Total mobile operators by subscribers going forward. This year’s Global Telecom’s ranking of the when it bought the African assets of 100 marks the fall of Zain and world’s biggest network Kuwait mobile operator Zain for charts the major risers and fallers, operators, plus figures on US$10.7 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Micro Devices
    Advanced Micro Devices Trevor Tingley (ttingley) Problem/Persona ● Consumers want computing products that are cheaper, but also competitive. ● OEM’s want to cover all product segments. Products ● Desktop/Laptop/Server CPUs + GPUs ● Accelerated Processing Units (CPU + GPU = APU) ● Enterprise, Embedded, Semi-Custom Silicon Finances Quarterly Revenue (Billions) YoY Quarterly Growth (Percent) Business Model AMD CPU Market Share (Quarterly) ● Product Divisions ○ Computing & Graphics (~70% of Revenue) ○ Enterprise, Embedded & Semi-Custom Silicon (~30% of Revenue) History Founded by Walter Jeremiah (Jeremy) Sanders AMD Acquires ATI Technologies AMD Hires Jim Keller as Zen Architecture Lead 1982 2009 2020 1969 2006 2012 Intel gives AMD x86 instruction AMD and Intel Agree to Cross AMD reaches 40% CPU Market set license (IBM Compatible) Licensing Deal over x86 (Intel) share for the first time in ~15 and x86-64 (AMD) years Leadership Dr. Lisa Su Rick Bergman Mark Papermaster President & CEO Executive VP, Computing and CTO & Executive VP, Graphics Business Group Technology & Engineering What’s Hot? ● Semi-Custom Silicon ○ Part of Sony and Microsoft consoles since 2013 Secret Sauce ● Strategic Business Moves Competition Desktop/Laptop CPU Desktop/Laptop In Development GPU Desktop/Laptop APU Custom Silicon Prediction ● Slow, but gradual growth for the next few years (at least) ● AMD at 7nm with path to 5nm, Intel currently at 14nm ● Potential to grab record 50% market share References ● https://www.amd.com/en ● https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMD/amd/revenue
    [Show full text]
  • 26Th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics Hyderabad, India  December 17-20, 2019
    26th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics Hyderabad, India December 17-20, 2019 PROGRAM OVERVIEW HiPC 2019 marks the return of the conference to Hyderabad, helping to expand broader participation in India. Our full program runs four days, with workshops and tutorials on Day 1, student programs, exhibits and industry events on Days 1, 2 and 3, and the formal technical program of plenary sessions presented on Days 2, 3, and 4. This year there will be several special events to highlight research in India and the industry-academia partnership that is driving it. KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Wednesday, December 18th – Keynote 1 Data Flow Execution Models - a Third Opinion Vivek Sarkar, Georgia Institute of Technology Thursday, December 19th – Keynote 2 Genome Sequencing For Disease Diagnosis: The Confluence of Biology and Computing Ramesh Hariharan, Strand Life Sciences Thursday, December 19th – Keynote 3 Delivering the Future of High-Performance Computing Mark Papermaster, AMD Friday, December 20th – Keynote 4 The New World of Heterogeneous AI/ML High Performance Computing with Intel FPGAs José Roberto Alvarez, Intel 16 December 2019 edition TECHNICAL PROGRAM The HiPC 2019 technical program on Days 2, 3 and 4 will consist of 39 peer reviewed papers chosen from over 170 submissions from all over the world submitted. The papers will be presented in seven plenary sessions and will cover important and timely topics in all areas of high performance computing and data science. There are four keynote speakers this year will open the morning plenary sessions. On Day 3 there will be an invited technical session featuring research with and “Indian flavor” organized by India academic researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering the Future of High-Performance Computing
    AMD~ DELIVERING THE FUTURE OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MARK PAPERMASTER Aug 5, 2019 AMD HISTORY OF INNOVATION .. n. ;==>s 4 mi :i \'~~~,, ~; . ·~ W XBOXONE ~ ·- First to break the First to break teraflops ■World's First 4K game First 16-core World's first 7nm historic 1GHz barrier performance barrier first APU consoles HEDT processor datacenter GPU 2000 2003 2006 2009 2011 2013 2017 2017 2017 2018 2018 2019 I I .-- .. -=~~ / ~ ~Y Z i::il' I 'I!/: ,o ,. r-.I ~~!'fi':, mw ,. r -;.. \,. World's first x86-64 First to break Inside every major First 32-Core First 32-core First 7nm bit architecture 1GHz GPU barrier gaming console x86 single socket HEDT processor chiplet design server CPU GPU AND CPU PERFORMANCE TRENDS GPU Single Precision Floating Point Operations Specint® _rate2006 2P Server Per Second Trend Performance Trend Over Time 100000GF 100X ... ~·····o 0 10000GF 8 .:; Vl c._ <i::l.•····· ····· a::"' .... .. 0 0 0 Cl/ y· ••• •·· o _, g:. ..... u LL C 0·· l9 1000GF 9.. "' C •·····ee······ '(£P--~s .. • E 0 0 ~~·~····· ·.;; _,,T ·c; eJct•to•o Q t:\Jt_~'( 1.:JS 't: Cl/ lOX ... ~ 'J.'J. L Q. c._ ....:::, Cl/ 100GF 0. 01) ..c (mc5 '···6 C 01) :::, .. (9 vi e (?.l,··OO ..c I- w~ ((!Er' ••• 0 3 I FUTURE OF COMPUTING COi AMD~ PROCESS TECHNOLOGY DELIVERED SIGNIFICANT GAINS Technology Energy Efficiency and Density Across Process Nodes p,.'( 3 '(£.r>,.RS '(£.r>,.RS ot\'\S\~ t~~'{ £_\ltR'l 3.6 1-"' tff ~ .., ~\\G'f ,c,~ ~ . 1-"' t,, ~ ..... •····················~ 0 ··············~ .... •················1············ 0 Energy/cycle ,!, Density Expon .
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetics: Introduction
    Electromagnetics: Introduction Yoonchan Jeong School of Electrical Engineering, Seoul National University Tel: +82 (0)2 880 1623, Fax: +82 (0)2 873 9953 Email: [email protected] Course book: Field and Wave Electromagnetics (D. K. Cheng, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, 1989) • What you have learnt (I presume): – Chap. 1. The Electromagnetic Model – Chap. 2. Vector Analysis – Chap. 3. Static Electric Fields – Chap. 4. Solution of Electrostatic Problems – Chap. 5. Steady Electric Currents – Chap. 6. Static Magnetic Fields This is all you need to learn! • What you will be learning: – Chap. 7. Time-Varying Fields and Maxwell’s Equations – Chap. 8. Plane Electromagnetic Waves – Chap. 10. Waveguides and Cavity Resonators (incl. Optical Fibers) – Chap. 9. Theory and Applications of Transmission Lines – Chap. 11. Antennas and Radiating Systems 2 Maxwell’s Equations ∂B ∇×E + = 0 Faraday’s law ∂ t “Displacement current” Michael Faraday ∂D (1791−1867) ∇×H − = J Ampère’s law ∂t ∇ ⋅D = ρ Gauss’s law James Clerk Maxwell (1831−1879) ∇ ⋅B = 0 No free magnetic monopole (?) Andre Marie Ampere (1775 - 1835) DEEP=ε = ε 0 + Constitutive relations 1 1 HBBM= = − µ µ0 Findings of 19th century!! Carl Friedrich Gauss Oliver Heaviside 3 (1777 - 1855) (1850−1925) Electromagnetic Waves Wave equations: ∂ 2E ∂ 2H ∇2E − µε =0, ∇2H − µε = 0 (Homogeneous and no source) ∂t 2 ∂t 2 Plane wave: e..(,)(,) g f x t= f x −δ x t − δ t ψ = ei()ω t−k ⋅ r , k = ω µε Phase velocity: ω 1 ωt −k ⋅ r = constant, u = = , p k µε 1 c = = 2.997930 ×108 m / s µo ε o 6 Physics Soton UK Time-Varying
    [Show full text]
  • Certificate of Interested Entities by Apple, Inc
    Hovsepian v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 26 1 DAVID M. WALSH (SB# 120761) [email protected] PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 2 515 South Flower Street Twenty-Fifth Floor 3 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 683-6000 4 Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 5 THOMAS A. COUNTS (SB# 148051) [email protected] ERIC A. LONG (SB# 244147) [email protected] 6 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street 7 Twenty-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 8 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 9 Attorneys for Defendant 10 APPLE INC. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 ARAM HOVSEPIAN, individually and on CASE NO. C 08-05788 JF behalf of all others similarly situated, 16 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED Plaintiff, ENTITIES OR PERSONS 17 vs. 18 [FRCP 7.1 AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-16] APPLE INC., 19 Defendant. Complaint Filed: December 31, 2008 20 Hon. Jeremy Fogel 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED Case No. C 08-05788 JF ENTITIES OR PERSONS Dockets.Justia.com 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) 2 hereby discloses that it is a publicly held company with numerous shareholders. It has no parent 3 company, and no company owns more than ten percent (10%) of its stock. 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 3-16, the undersigned counsel certifies that the following 5 persons are directors and executive officers of Apple who have a financial interest in Apple, as 6 defined by 28 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Printmgr File
    ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 2485 AUGUSTINE DRIVE SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95054 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS You are cordially invited to attend our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (our “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. Our Annual Meeting will be held virtually via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMD2021. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. We are holding our Annual Meeting to: • Elect the eight director nominees named in this proxy statement; • Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year; • Approve on a non-binding, advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”); and • Transact any other business that properly comes before our Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. We are pleased to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the SEC’s “notice and access” rules. As a result, we are mailing to our stockholders (other than those who previously requested printed or emailed materials on an ongoing basis) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) instead of printed copies of our proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet, how to vote on the Internet and how you can receive printed or emailed copies of our proxy materials. We believe that providing our proxy materials over the Internet will lower our Annual Meeting’s cost and environmental impact, while increasing the ability of our stockholders to access the information that they need.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaquille O'neal Wants a New Nickname: the 'Green Monster'? - Csmonitor.Com
    Shaquille O'Neal wants a new nickname: the 'Green Monster'? - CSMonitor.com % Search Subscribe and save 71 WORLD USA COMMENTARY MONEY ENVIRONMENT INNOVATION SCIENCE THE CULTURE BOOKS USA All USA Topics FREE daily e- Shaquille O'Neal wants a new nickname: More USA Iraqi forces ready for US pullout, says Army's the 'Green Monster'? Odierno Shaquille O'Neal, the newest member of the Boston Celtics, has announced that he's looking for a new nickname. If you think he's just 'Shaq,' you haven't been paying attention. Like You and 34 others like this.34 people like this. · Admin Page · Error Unlike By Matt Rocheleau, Contributor / August 5, 2010 Boston There’s no shortage of accomplishments in Shaquille O’Neal’s basketball legacy. Likewise, the 7- foot-1, 325-pound center has seen no shortage of nicknames. The 15-time all-star has toured five teams over his 18- About these ads year career. All the while, fans and sportscasters have called the iconic NBA center, rapper and actor such names as “The Diesel,” “The Big Aristotle,” and “The Big Shaqtus.” A University of Phoenix MBA degree- holder, “Dr. Shaq” is a former number one draft pick Most viewed turned rookie of the year. A 38-year-old father of six, “Shaq Daddy” has been crowned most valuable player. 1. Fidel Castro warns of nuclear war, climate change – ignores Cuba issues “Wilt Chamberneezy” has won four NBA titles and an 2. Why GOP reaction is muted as judge affirms gay Olympic gold medal and he inspired the term “Hack-a- marriage rights Shaq” to describe when teams purposely foul an 3.
    [Show full text]