Ngarimu Blair

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ngarimu Blair BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL UNDER the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 and the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER of the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan AND IN THE MATTER of submissions by Ngati Whatua Orakei Whai Maia Limited on Topic 009 RPS Mana Whenua BETWEEN NGATI WHATUA ORAKEI WHAI MAIA LIMITED SUBMITTER 3085 AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MR NGARIMU BLAIR DATED 30 OCTOBER 2014 PO Box 3798, Auckland 1140 TELEPHONE +64 9 353 9700 FACSIMILE +64 9 353 9701 SOLICITOR ACTING: ANNEKE THEELEN [email protected] PARTNER RESPONSIBLE: DANIEL CLAY 11712257:1 AYT Court 1 INTRODUCTION 1. My name is Ngarimu Alan Huiroa Blair. I am the Deputy Chair of the Ngati Whatua Orakei Trust which is an elected body that represents the collective interests of the descendants of Tuperiri who established Ngati Whatua Orakei mana and Ahi Kaaroa on the Auckland Isthmus in the mid 17th Century. SUMMARY 2. The key points of my statement of evidence are as follows; (a) Ngati Whatua Orakei has mana whenua/ahi kaaroa for a large and significant part of the area now governed by Auckland Council, centred around the Auckland isthmus. Ngati Whatua Orakei acknowledge that other iwi or hapu can claim tangata whenua status and hold mana and ahi kaaroa for other parts of the Council’s jurisdictional area. (b) Ngati Whatua Orakei is a significant landowner in Auckland. It owns land in various parts of Auckland, both Treaty settlement and commercially purchased land. Through these interests, Ngati Whatua Orakei has experience in co-governance with statutory bodies such as Auckland Council. (c) Ngati Whatua Orakei has not been adequately involved in planning for Auckland since 1840, and has suffered as a result. There are many examples where I consider that a different, more informed and better outcome could have been arrived at if Ngati Whatua Orakei were involved. The result of this lack of adequate and appropriate input into planning decisions is an inadequate understanding and response to the cultural issues and concerns Ngati Whatua Orakei have. (d) Ngati Whatua Orakei should have involvement in planning processes and decisions which involve or affects Ngati Whatua Orakei interests. This involvement should in my view be more than ad hoc consultation as simply another ‘stakeholder’. We should be at the decision making table for relevant proposals, and methods such as joint management agreements would go a long way to achieving this. The proposed 11712257:1 2 Unitary Plan (PAUP) provisions on this matter are a good start, but should go further to actively encourage and facilitate co-governance. (e) Ngati Whatua Orakei as a Treaty partner and ahi kaaroa with unbroken occupation and use has a particular status and expertise in resource management including as kaitiaki. There will be benefits to ‘good decision making’ if Ngati Whatua Orakei were involved in planning processes. (f) The PAUP does not have a complete list of culturally significant sites and some identified sites are limited in the area protected (e.g. certain maunga). Further, the identification of some areas are culturally sensitive so are not appropriate to include in the PAUP. Protection of culturally significant sites should not be limited to those listed in the PAUP. (g) Okahu Bay should be included as a culturally significant site. It has cultural significance since and prior to the signing of the Treaty by Ngati Whatua Orakei tupuna in 1840, is the ancestral kainga (village) of Ngati Whatua Orakei and remains a significant site to Ngati Whatua Orakei. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 3. I hold a bachelors degree in Geography and Maori from the University of Auckland and lecture is various departments there and at AUT on Maori urban planning, design and media matters. I established the Ngati Whatua Orakei Heritage and Planning unit in 1998, the predecessor to the Ngati Whatua Orakei Whai Maia Limited, Toki Taiao Unit. 4. I have read the Environment Court’s Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses contained within the Environment Court Practice Note 2011. I agree to comply with the Code. This evidence is within my area of expertise. I have not omitted to consider material facts known to me that might alter or detract from my expressed opinions. 11712257:1 3 NGATI WHATUA ORAKEI WHAI MAIA LIMITED 5. The Ngati Whatua Orakei Trust owns two subsidiary companies which each in turn have separate Boards of Directors that include independent people. Whai Maia Limited is responsible for the day to day operations that relate to the social and cultural enhancement of our people. This includes protecting our natural resources, waahi whakahirahira (sites of significance) and waahi tapu (sacred sites) through the exercise of kaitiakitanga. Our failure to adequately protect our natural and cultural heritage not only has serious negative impacts on our physical well-being but also on our cultural and spiritual essence. NGATI WHATUA ORAKEI - BRIEF RELEVANT HISTORY 6. Although there was involvement prior to that time, Ngati Whatua’s occupation of the Tamaki Isthmus (i.e. the land between and bordering the Waitemata and Manukau Harbours) began in earnest in the 17th Century. This occupation is marked by some of the twenty Ngati Whatua placenames dating from this period, e.g. Te Rae o Kawharu (Arch Hill), Te Whakatakatakanga (Hobson Bay), Ipupakore (near Mount Eden Prison), Te Toi o Kawharu (the highest point in the Waitakere Ranges) and Te Rerengaoraiti (Point Britomart - now destroyed). 7. From the 18th Century and more particularly since 1740 Ngati Whatua have been tangata whenua and hold mana and Ahi Kaaroa (unbroken occupation and use) over the whole inner Waitemata Harbour, from Mission Bay (formerly Kohimaramara) in the east and all points west from there to the Tasman Sea, together with equivalent parts of North Shore, and ranging south-west to the northern part of the Manukau Harbour from Mangere to the Manukau Heads. This resulted from the campaigning of Ngati Whatua under the principal leadership of Tuperiri against the Waiohua. After the final battle at Mt. Mangere, Tuperiri built his main Pa at Maungakiekie (One Tree Hill) and held undisputed possession of all the lands in the Isthmus formerly held by the Waiohua, (which latter, notwithstanding intermarriage then ceased to exist as a separate iwi). As stated in the Judgment of Chief Native Land Court Judge Fenton in his well-known 1869 Judgment on the status of the Orakei Block, Ngati Whatua had: 11712257:1 4 “...exterminated the tribes that occupied this Isthmus, entered into possession of the empty country and settled down permanently and here they have ever since remained as the dominant lord of the soil. The Court has found that there are no concurrent rights or titles which ought to diminish their estates or interests and it therefore decides that one or more certificates of title shall issue in favour of these tribes (i.e. Te Taou, Ngaoho, and Te Uringutu today known as 'Ngati Whatua Orakei') or in favour of such persons comprising them as shall be determined upon hearing further evidence...”(2) 8. I should add that from 1740 onwards to 1840 Ngati Whatua are recorded as living and working not only at Tuperiri’s main Pa at Maungakiekie (One Tree Hill) but also at: Okahu, Whakatakataka (Orakei), Purewa (Meadowbank), Rangitoto (Remuera), Waipapa (Beach Road), Horotiu (Queen Street/Albert Park), Waiariki (University/Albert Park), Te To (Auckland Gas Works), Te Rehu (Shelly Point), Onewa (Kauri Point), Maunganui (Birkdale), Ouruamo (Beach Haven), Tauhinu (Greenhithe), Pitoitoi (Riverhead), Kopupaka (Henderson), Hikurangi (Manukau Heads), Karangahape (Cornwallis), Ihumatao (Manukau/Mangere), Te Whau (Blockhouse Bay), Mangere, Onehunga, Waikumete and/or Owairaka. 9. Ngati Whatua had their food production in the central Isthmus organised into gardening and fishing circuits themselves dictated by soils, fish stocks and the native calendar (maramataka). There were numerous fishing circuits around both the Waitemata and Manukau Harbours, generally commencing in early spring and using fishing stations when distant from main settlements. For instance, shark and snapper in the Waitemata were obtained off Kohimaramara, Okahu, Okaa (Herne Bay), west around the Harbour off Te Whau, north to Pitoitoi and Tauhinu, south and east to Ouruamo and Onewa. In the Manukau there were abundant pipi, kina, paua, kutai and tio all along the northern shore especially from Te Whau to Karangahape. Off Mangere/Ihumatao (Ihu-mata-oho) and Puketutu Island, there were patiki and kahawai as well as shark. 11712257:1 5 PAX BRITANNICA 10. In 1840 Te Kawau and other Ngati Whatua leaders signed the Treaty of Waitangi and then the first sale agreement that led to the establishment of Auckland as now outlined: “For Ngati Whatua, Apihai Te Kawau the then principal leader, Reweti and Tinana signed the Treaty of Waitangi at Manuka (Manukau) on 20 March 1840 with W C Symonds signing on behalf of the Crown. It was a Treaty that opened with reference to “Peace and Good Order” and the “necessary Laws and Institutions. But Te Kawau sought more than words to gain security against the Northern tribes.”(3) 11. In fact he actively sought an alliance with the Crown. By such means he hoped to obtain military protection and instruction in the arts of commerce, in return for land for settlement and food and shelter for the early colonists. Accordingly he sent his nephew, Reweti, and others to the Bay of Islands to ask Governor Hobson to come to Tamaki. As the Waitangi Tribunal notes, “... a few days after the signing of the Treaty, seven chiefs from Orakei came to the Bay seeking protection against their old enemies the Nga Puhi, and asking the Lieutenant-Governor to take up his residence amongst them.
Recommended publications
  • Proposed Private Plan Change, Queen Elizabeth Square, Auckland: Heritage Impact Assessment
    PROPOSED PRIVATE PLAN CHANGE, QUEEN ELIZABETH SQUARE, AUCKLAND: HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Report prepared for Precinct Properties New Zealand Limited By Adina Brown (MA, MSc) Zarah Burnett (MA Hons) March 2015 Clough & Associates Ltd. [email protected] 321 Forest Hill Rd, Waiatarua AUCKLAND 0612 Telephone: (09) 8141946 Mobile 0274 850 059 www.clough.co.nz TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Project Background ........................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 2 Historical Background .......................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5 Development of Queen Elizabeth Square Area ................................................................ 5 Endeans Building ............................................................................................................ 35 Auckland Chief Post Office ............................................................................................ 45 Ferry Building ................................................................................................................. 55 Past Research and Investigation.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overspill Alternative Jor South Auckland
    Photograph by courtesy Dunedin City Council. • Aerial photogrammetric mapping • Large scale photo enlargements • Mosaics • Ground control surveys AERO SURVEYS New Zea and LTD. P.O. Box 444 Tauranga Telephone 88-166 TOWN PLANNING QUARTERLY •Layout, Design &Production: COVER: "WELLINGTON Editor: J. R. Dart WIND" EVENING POST. Technical Editor: M. H. Pritchard D. Vendramini Department of Town Planning. J. Graham University of Auckland. MARCH 1974 NUMBER 25 EDITORIAL COMMUNITY PROPERTY DEREK HALL CASEBOOK CHRISTINE MOORE A CONTRAST IN SETTLEMENT: AUCKLAND AND WELLINGTON 1840-41 RICHARD BELLAMY 17 ABOUT WATER T.W. FOOKES 24 OVERSPILL ALTERNATIVE FOR SOUTH AUCKLAND. (PART 2) 28 CONFERENCES SYLVIA McCURDY 29 LETTER FROM SCOTLAND D.H. FR EESTON 33 WIND ENVIRONMENT OF BUILDINGS 38 INSTITUTE AFFAIRS Town Planning Quarterly is the official journal of the New Address all correspondence to the Editor: Town Planning Zealand Planning Institute Incorporated, P.O. Box 5131, Quarterly, P.O. Box 8789, Symonds Street, Auckland 1. WeUington. Telephone/Telegrams: 74-740 The Institute does not accept responsibility for statements made or opinions expressed in this Journal unless this responsibility is expressly acknowledged. Printed by Published March, June, September, December. Scott Printing Co. Ltd., Annual Subscription: $3 (New Zealand and Australia) 29-31 Rutland Street, post free, elsewhere $NZ. 4.50 Auckland 1. The Mayor of Auckland caught the headlines recently with his suggestion that a group be formed to examine the extent and nature of the metropolitan area's future growth. The idea, so far anyway, seems not to have been taken very seriously, but is is one that is worth pursuing.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment D
    Te Takutai taketake o Tāmaki Makaurau Tāmaki o taketake Takutai Te Discover Auckland’s Original Foreshore Original Auckland’s Discover 13 Foreshore Heritage Walk Heritage Foreshore You are at site at are You FOLD Foreshore Heritage Walk Discover Auckland’s Original Foreshore Follow the Foreshore Heritage Walk Te Takutai taketake o Tāmaki Makaurau Whāia Te Ara Takutai Sites of significance Swanson Street Queen Street The walking route between Point Erin Park and Parnell Baths Māori knew this beautiful coastline as Tāmaki The high land here defines the inner limits of Queen Street was formed along the banks of Makaurau (“Tāmaki of the many lovers”), a place so Commercial or Store Bay and was the first area of Waihorotiu, a creek that ran down the Queen Street Waitematā Harbour bountiful that many tribal wars were fought for its European settlement in 1840. gully. In the absence of good infrastructure in the THE TW possession. The area’s fertile gardening soils, abundant Originally known as West Queen Street, the lane was named Swanson settlement’s early years, waste was disposed fishing stocks and headlands offering vantage points Street in 1883, after Hon. William Swanson (1819-1903). He was a of into the creek which emptied into the Point Erin 2 made Tāmaki, as it still is today, the centre of the prominent colonial businessman, timber miller, MP for Newton 1871-1884 Waitematā Harbour. 1 EE TEET and member of the Legislative Council. TEET largest Māori population in the world. By the early 1850s, brick walls lined the sides of the creek and it BET The intersecting Mills Lane was named after Thornton, Smith and Firth’s TEET became known as Ligar’s Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Auckland
    FUTURE AUCKLAND EDUCATION KIT AUCKLAND MUSEUM AUCKLAND CITY Auckland Museum Te Papa Whakahiku C ontents Contents page Introduction to the Resource 02 Why Study the City's Future? 02 Exhibit Your Work at the Auckland Museum 03 Teacher Background 04 The First People of Auckland 04 The Early Days of Auckland 04 Auckland War Memorial Museum 07 Auckland City Council 09 Population of Auckland City 10 Future Trends and Options 11 Curriculum Links 12 Level 2 Pre and Post-Visit Activities 12 Level 3 Pre and Post-Visit Activities 14 Level 4 Pre and Post-Visit Activities 15 Level 5 Pre and Post-Visit Activities 17 Activity Sheets 20 Museum Trails 39 MUSEUM ACTIVITIES March 30 - May 28 'Future Auckland' an inter- active display of possible futures. Venue: Treasures & Tales Discovery Centre. June 1 - July 31 'Future Auckland - Student Vision' a display of student's work. Venue: Treasures & Tales Discovery Centre. Museum Trail of Auckland’s Past. Venue: Auckland 1866 and Natural History Galleries. HOW DO YOU MAKE A BOOKING? Booking before your visit is essential and ensures you have the centre to yourself (depending on the size of your group), or are sharing it with another group of similar age. Book early. Phone: (09) 306 7040 Auckland Museum 1 Introduction to the Resource Intro It is difficult to consider the future with- Why Study the duction out first contemplating how the past has City's Future? shaped our present, be it attitudes, sys- In order to make decisions affecting our tems or environment. future, it is vital to consider the alterna- tives and choices that are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Walk Final with out Cover Re-Print.Indd
    Heritage Walks _ The Engineering Heritage of Auckland 5 The Auckland City Refuse Destructor 1905 Early Electricity Generation 1908 9 Wynyard Wharf 1922 3 13 Auckland Electric 1 Hobson Wharf The New Zealand National Maritime Museum Tramways Co. Ltd Princes Wharf 1937 1989 1899–1902 1921–24 12 7 2 The Viaduct 10 4 11 The Auckland Gasworks, Tepid Baths Lift Bridge The Auckland Harbour Bridge The Sky Tower Viaduct Harbour first supply to Auckland 1865 1914 1932 1955-59 1997 1998-99 Route A 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Route B 14 Old 15 Auckland High Court 13 The Old Synagogue 1 10 Albert Park 1942 Government 1865-7 1884-85 The Ferry Building House 1912 1856 16 Parnell Railway Bridge and Viaduct 5 The Dingwall Building 1935 1865-66 3 Chief Post Office 1911 The Britomart Transport Centre 7 The Ligar Canal, named 1852, improved 1860s, covered 1870s 6 8 Civic Theatre 1929 2001-2004 New Zealand 9 Guardian Trust The Auckland Town Hall Building 1911 1914 17 The Auckland Railway Station 1927-37 11 Albert Barracks Wall 2 Queens Wharf 1913 1846-7 4 The Dilworth Building 1926 12 University of Auckland Old Arts Building 1923-26 10 Route A, approx 2.5 hours r St 9 Route B, approx 2.5 hours Hame Brigham St Other features Jellicoe St 1 f r ha W Madden s 2 e St St rf Princ a 12 h 13 W s Beaumont START HERE een 11 Qu Pakenha m St St 1 son ob H St bert y St n St Gaunt St Al 2 e e Pakenh S ue ket Place H1 am Q Hals St 3 ar Customs M St Quay St 3 4 18 NORTH Sw 8 St anson S Fanshawe t 5 7 6 Wyn Shortla dham nd
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland's Urban Form
    A brief history of Auckland’s urban form April 2010 A brief history of Auckland’s urban form April 2010 Introduction 3 1840 – 1859: The inaugural years 5 1860 – 1879: Land wars and development of rail lines 7 1880 – 1899: Economic expansion 9 1900 – 1929: Turning into a city 11 1930 – 1949: Emergence of State housing provision 13 1950 – 1969: Major decisions 15 1970 – 1979: Continued outward growth 19 1980 – 1989: Intensifi cation through infi ll housing 21 1990 – 1999: Strategies for growth 22 2000 – 2009: The new millennium 25 Conclusion 26 References and further reading 27 Front cover, top image: North Shore, Auckland (circa 1860s) artist unknown, Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tamaki, gift of Marshall Seifert, 1991 This report was prepared by the Social and Economic Research and Monitoring team, Auckland Regional Council, April 2010 ISBN 978-1-877540-57-8 2 History of Auckland’s Urban Form Auckland region Built up area 2009 History of Auckland’s Urban Form 3 Introduction This report he main feature of human settlement in the Auckland region has been the development This report outlines the of a substantial urban area (the largest in development of Auckland’s New Zealand) in which approximately 90% urban form, from early colonial Tof the regional population live. This metropolitan area settlement to the modern Auckland is located on and around the central isthmus and metropolis. It attempts to capture occupies around 10% of the regional land mass. Home the context and key relevant to over 1.4 million people, Auckland is a vibrant centre drivers behind the growth in for trade, commerce, culture and employment.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – Kainga Nga Ika Me Nga Wheua Katoa! Auckland – Where the Fish Are So Succulent You Can Eat Them Bones and All!
    THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – kainga nga ika me nga wheua katoa! Auckland – where the fish are so succulent you can eat them bones and all! This proverb alludes to the once abundant and sought after marine resources of Auckland’s waterfront. It signals Waterfront Auckland’s desire to create a sustainable waterfront providing for the current and future generations of Aucklanders. A place all Aucklanders can access the Waitemata Harbour for recreation, business or cultural practices. FOREWORD The waterfront has reignited Aucklander’s pride in their city. The pride and enthusiasm with which Aucklanders have embraced their new waterfront continues to amaze me. Although in its infancy, stage one of the redeveloped Wynyard Quarter and the expanse of Queens Wharf, attract people day after day, rain and shine. When Waterfront Auckland put forward its draft plans for the redevelopment of the whole waterfront last year we received hundreds of letters, emails and submissions. Most were hugely positive. “Just get on with it!” was the cry. Our job at Waterfront Auckland is to lead the momentum of the revitalisation, and of pride. Having listened to Aucklanders, we have refined our plans and here, we present a vision for how the waterfront could be redeveloped, how it can continue to create transformational change. We are living in an extraordinary time, perhaps unprecedented in recent history where opportunity is constrained and likely to remain so for some time to come. Our approach in these plans is to strike a balance that seizes opportunity while it is offering and continues to strive for a visionary outcome that our city and its people deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • The Draft Plans for Westhaven Summary
    THE DRAFT PLANS FOR WESTHAVEN SUMMARY_ 1 A MARINE ICON Westhaven Marina is a precious icon of Auckland. It epitomises the City of Sails lifestyle and our marine and sailing culture. To make sure this treasure continues to operate as a premier marina facility, and is a welcoming place for all Aucklanders to explore and spend time in, we’re putting together a plan for how the area is improved for the future. The draft plans for Westhaven focus on five key areas: • public spaces and activation • sustainable development and environmental enhancement • culture and heritage • more efficient use of the 530,000m2 waterspace and 82,889m2 land within the marina • parking and transport needs This document provides a summary of the draft plans for Westhaven. We want to make sure you have the opportunity to take a look at the plans and give your feedback before they are finalised. For more detail on any of the projects outlined in this document visit www.waterfrontauckland.co.nz 2 HISTORY The waterfront is where Auckland began. The gathering of fish and shellfish, the harvesting of crops, and the plying of trade have been part of the waterfront’s earliest history. There are a number of former headland pā bookended by Ok¯a (Point Erin) and Taur¯arua (Point Resolution) with Te Rerenga-Oraiti (Point Britomart) in between that provided vantage points to monitor the comings and goings on the harbour. Established in the 1940s, Westhaven Marina is the largest marina in the Southern Hemisphere. Formed within St Mary’s Bay, it is a cornerstone of Auckland’s rich maritime heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Metro Rail Network Electrification
    AUCKLAND METRO RAIL NETWORK ELECTRIFICATION Heritage Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 3 2.0 Introduction 4 3.0 Heritage Significance 6 4.0 Western Line (Newmarket–Swanson) 12 5.0 Britomart–Penrose–Onehunga 18 6.0 Penrose–Papakura (including Manukau Branch) 26 7.0 Eastern Diversion (Britomart–Westfield) 32 8.0 Conclusion 35 9.0 Appendices APPENDIX 1: Identification of Groups / 37 Individuals / Stakeholders for Consultation APPENDIX 2: Historical Chronology 38 APPENDIX 3: Policy for Government 66 Departments’ Management of Historic Heritage APPENDIX 4: Draft Areas of Visual Sensitivity 75 for Discussion APPENDIX 5: Map of Study Area 89 APPENDIX 6: Map of Railway Lines 90 APPENDIX 7: Items of Potential Significance (P*) 91 to be Altered or Demolished AUCKLAND METRO-RAIL ELECTRIFICATION: Heritage Assessment Page 2 of 92 1.0 Executive Summary This heritage assessment has been prepared to identify the built rail heritage in the Auckland Metro Rail network and to understand the heritage issues associated with the electrification of the network. It is supported and underpinned by the Policy for Government Departments’ Management of Historic Heritage 2004. The overall heritage significance of the various lines is discussed and the study further identifies 59 heritage ‘items’ including stations and associated structures on a 3 tiered scale according to their identified (I), potential (P) and adjacent significance (A), (see Section 3.0) Based on the historical chronology, (see APPENDIX 2), the assessment follows in consecutive order along the rail lines as they developed historically, section 4.0 Western Line, section 5.0 Britomart-Penrose- Onehunga, section 6.0 Penrose-Papakura (including Manukau Branch), and section 7.0 Eastern Diversion (Britomart-Westfield).
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment D
    Te Takutai taketake o Tāmaki Makaurau Tāmaki o taketake Takutai Te Discover Auckland’s Original Foreshore Original Auckland’s Discover 16 Foreshore Heritage Walk Heritage Foreshore You are at site at are You FOLD Foreshore Heritage Walk Discover Auckland’s Original Foreshore Follow the Foreshore Heritage Walk Te Takutai taketake o Tāmaki Makaurau Whāia Te Ara Takutai Official Bay Wynyard Pier Auckland Saltwater Baths Formation of Anzac Avenue The walking route between Point Erin Park and Parnell Baths Official Bay (also known as Exclusion Bay) was named The 500 foot long Wynyard Pier, a timber wharf, was In 1911, a New Zealand Herald editorial described: Anzac Avenue was originally known as Jermyn Street, after the government officials who resided there. built in 1851, funded largely by private subscription. named after Captain John Jermyn Symonds (1816- “In the early days there were ample facilities for bathers Waitematā Harbour These officials were members of Governor Hobson’s Crown Colony Sir Robert Henry Wynyard (1802-1864), a colonial in every part of the foreshore, but reclamations, 1883), a 19th-century politician and judge of the THE TW government which was established in Auckland in 1840. administrator, settled in the bay in Felton Mathew’s wharves, streets, and city extensions generally, Native Land Court. old home. Point Erin 2 Prominent residents in the area included; gradually pushed the bathers away.” When work began on realigning the road in 1915 the new name Jellicoe was proposed. By the end of 1916 the name Anzac Avenue was Felton Mathew, Surveyor-General. 1 EE TEET The pier was constructed at the foot of Short Street, which at the time One of these facilities on the foreshore was the Auckland Saltwater Baths.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront Plan
    Tamaki – kainga nga ika me nga wheua katoa! Auckland – where the fish are so succulent you can eat them bones and all! This proverb alludes to the once abundant and sought after marine resources of Auckland’s waterfront. It signals Waterfront Auckland’s desire to create a sustainable waterfront providing for the current and future generations of Aucklanders. A place all Aucklanders can access the Waitemata Harbour for recreation, business or cultural practices. FOREWORD The waterfront has reignited Aucklanders’ pride in their city. The pride and enthusiasm with which Aucklanders have embraced their new waterfront continues to amaze me. Although in its infancy, stage one of the redeveloped Wynyard Quarter and the expanse of Queens Wharf, attract people day after day, rain and shine. When Waterfront Auckland put forward its draft plans for the redevelopment of the whole waterfront last year, we received hundreds of letters, emails and submissions. Most were hugely positive. “Just get on with it!” was the cry. Our job at Waterfront Auckland is to lead the momentum of the revitalisation, and of pride. Having listened to Aucklanders, we have refined our plans, and here we present a vision for how the waterfront could be redeveloped, how it can continue to create transformational change. We are living in an extraordinary time, perhaps unprecedented in recent history, where opportunity is constrained and likely to remain so for some time to come. Our approach in these plans is to strike a balance that seizes opportunity while it offers, and continues to strive for a visionary outcome that our city and its people deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • History Contents
    History Contents Sarah Mathews Te Rou Kai The Original Shore Line Historic Layers of Fort Lane and Surrounding Areas Script of Time Scenes Throughout History Sarah Mathews: ‘Aucklands First Lady’ I discovered a real-life account of an experience in early Auckland, Sarah Mathews personal journals. Mathew’s was the wife of Felton Mathews, New Zealand’s first general surveyor, travelling to New Zealand in 1840 Mathew’s journals account her first interactions with early Auckland. Sifting through the information recorded in, Sarah Mathews: explorer, journalist and Auckland’s ‘First lady’, by Tessa Duder I drew out scene setting quotes about early Auckland from Mathews Journals. “Though blowing very strong there was no rain, we landed at a rocky point…” “..to reach shore through the mud” Reaching the Auckland shoreline: “The ferns forming a sort of ladder to ascend the top of the bank” “Looking over the most dreary and desolate looking country the eye ever beheld” -Whilst on the peak of the current Mount Hobson, Sarah Louise Mathew. Auckland City Libraries - Tāmaki Pātaka Kōrero, Reference: A 11646. Remuera. Using historical research through the form of journal entries has framed the base of the installation concept, designing through a historical lens to portray film based scenes. By taking the encounters by Sarah Mathews I was inspired to draw out atmospheric conditions mentioned within the passages to frame and depict weathering and environmental patterns for the interior installation. The recounts of land looking dreary paint a realistic picture of what the first settlers encountered, this includes rain, wind and temperature conditions.
    [Show full text]