Debates of the European Parliament 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Debates of the European Parliament 1 07-06-2011 EN Debates of the European Parliament 1 TUESDAY, 7 JUNE 2011 IN THE CHAIR: GIANNI PITTELLA Vice-President 1. Opening of the sitting (The sitting was opened at 09:05) 2. Documents received: see Minutes 3. Petitions: see Minutes 4. Texts of agreements forwarded by the Council: see Minutes 5. Debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (announcement of motions for resolutions tabled): see Minutes 6. EHEC outbreak in the EU Member States (debate) President. – The next item is the Commission statement on the EHEC outbreak in the EU Member States. John Dalli, Member of the Commission. – Mr President, I should like to thank all of you for this opportunity to inform you about developments in relation to the outbreak of E coli. I am very concerned about the heavy burden of death and disease that this food-borne epidemic has caused the European population and want to take the opportunity once again to express my condolences to those who are suffering as a result. In this context, I have to note that the situation is still evolving. There are now over 1 672 Shiga-toxin-producing E coli cases, and serious complications have developed in at least 661 people. According to the latest information, this outbreak is responsible for 21 deaths in Germany and 1 in Sweden. Sporadic cases are reported in 11 other Member States. Switzerland has also reported 15 cases and the United States 4. The epicentre of the disease is still the area around Hamburg in northern Germany. Most of the cases reported outside Germany concern either German nationals travelling or persons who visited this part of Germany. So what is the European Commission doing to tackle the outbreak? First, we have immediately activated all our networks responsible for managing crises. The networks are in daily contact and allow for the timely exchange of information, laying the ground for rapid action. The Commission holds almost daily meetings with your public health authorities and food safety authorities to discuss the evolution of the outbreak, the health measures taken to prevent infection and the treatment of affected people. The Early Warning and Response System and the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed have provided a solid basis for exchanging information. Second, we have asked the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) to do a scientific risk assessment, which is being updated regularly as the situation evolves. We now have an EU case definition which will allow Member States to share the same approach on the investigation of the outbreak. Patient questionnaires for outbreak 2 EN Debates of the European Parliament 07-06-2011 investigations are being collected and compared by the ECDC. The ECDC has also developed, together with the European Food Safety Authority, advice on preventive measures addressed to the public. This advice is now available in all official languages on the Commission website. We have asked the ECDC to urgently set up a platform to exchange best practice on treatment, involving both Member States and professional societies. Our food safety EU reference laboratory in Rome developed in record time a method which reduces the time needed to detect the E coli bacterium in food from about six days to 48 hours. Finally, let me stress that public perception is extremely important. In this regard, the Commission draws up daily updates, shared with the Health Security Committee communicators’ network and food safety authorities. In addition, the Commission keeps its website dedicated to this outbreak up to date. I would strongly urge Members of the European Parliament to support this science-based communication to the public, in order to reduce unnecessary fears and to reinforce our common efforts. I can assure you that the Commission, together with these agencies, is working very hard with national health and food safety ministries to support them in containing this outbreak. To do that, we need to pursue intensively the investigation into the source of contamination; the work is taking place as I speak. During the Health Council yesterday, I asked Germany to reinforce surveillance, outbreak controls and measures in order to identify the source of the outbreak and halt the spread of the infection. I also asked that the causes of the contamination should be swiftly dealt with. The German authorities accepted the Commission proposal to dispatch to Germany experts in epidemiology of food-borne diseases from the Commission, the ECDC and the EFSA. On Sunday, 5 June, the experts started their mission to assist German authorities with the ongoing epidemiology, verify the results and contribute to the ongoing investigations to identify the source. As we all know, the initial suspicion raised by the German authorities that cucumbers from Spain were the cause has not been confirmed by any test results available. On Sunday, 5 June, the German authorities notified the European Commission that, based on the epidemiological investigations, they believe bean sprouts are the possible source of the E coli outbreak affecting mainly the northern part of Germany. The information was transferred immediately to all Member States through the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed. The Commission follows any new development closely, and will decide on the appropriate course of action the moment laboratory tests confirm any epidemiological finding. We do not have any results to date. Here, I should stress that it is crucial that national authorities do not rush to give information on any source of infection which is not proven by bacteriological analysis, as this spreads unjustified fears in the population all over Europe and creates problems for our food producers selling products in the EU and outside the EU. While such intensive investigations are going on, we must be careful not to jump to premature conclusions. In this respect, I want to refer to the latest information coming from Germany regarding the suspicion that sprouts may be the source of contamination; 07-06-2011 EN Debates of the European Parliament 3 it noted that laboratory tests have not been concluded and that consequently, premature conclusions have to be avoided. This illustrates that it is important for the Member States to introduce well sustained and scientifically based alerts into the RASFF and to trigger the RASFF when Member States are confident regarding the scientific evidence supporting the alert notification. You have to act quickly and decisively in order to preserve the Internal Market. If we manage to do this, then we can learn from the lessons of this crisis and continually improve our systems. I have been repeating: our system works. We need to learn lessons as we go along. I believe that this is our responsibility: to be flexible and to be fast in adjusting our processes and procedures to respond to these types of incidents. Coordination and clear lines of information and communication remain the core of our ability to be effective in such situations. We have to learn lessons on this front. Before closing, I would like to raise briefly two more points. The first concerns references to bans on certain products. I would like to stress again that the outbreak is limited geographically to an area surrounding the city of Hamburg, so there is no reason, as of today, to take such measures at European level. In the light of this and of the steps towards the identification of the source, we consider any ban on any product as disproportionate. Finally, I am also very sensitive to the financial impact that this crisis is having on farmers, particularly vegetable producers. This is why I am working closely with my colleague, Commissioner Cioloş, to address the hardship faced by this group of our citizens that has also been hit by the outbreak. In fact, Agriculture Ministers are holding an extraordinary Council meeting today to address E coli. As I finish talking to you, I will head back to Brussels to be with my colleague, Commissioner Cioloş, during this extraordinary Agriculture Ministers’ Council. In addition, we are in constant contact with third countries, in particular Russia, to ask them to lift their ban, which is considered disproportionate. The Commission is working hand in hand with the Member States with one common goal: to bring this outbreak to an end as soon as possible. I am insisting to all concerned that, in situations like this, it is not a local problem, it is a European problem. (Applause) Peter Liese , on behalf of the PPE Group. – (DE) Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to thank Commissioner Dalli for focusing on the patients first. I would like to do the same. Hundreds of people are severely ill. Medical personnel in northern Germany are really at their limit. Twenty-two people have already died. Yesterday in the Council, a representative of another Member State, Luxembourg, said that financial losses could be recompensed, but human life cannot. Therefore, I would firstly like to ask for understanding with regard to issuing a warning even if we are not 100% certain where the source is but only have a suspicion – that we also make this information public. Of course, we still have to find the source. I see that many people working for the authorities, with the support of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), too – my sincere thanks to the European institutions and to Commissioner Dalli for the fact that the European Union is also helping to investigate this matter – are really working very intensively on this. Nevertheless, as a German Member of this House, I cannot stand here and say that 4 EN Debates of the European Parliament 07-06-2011 everything is going well.
Recommended publications
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2021 Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas Vaida Lilionyte Manthos West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Manthos, Vaida Lilionyte, "Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas" (2021). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 8290. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/8290 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas Vaida Lilionyte Manthos Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Science at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science John Kilwein, Ph.D., Chair Shauna Fisher, Ph.D. Erik S. Herron, Ph.D. Daniel Renfrew, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Interest Groups in the European Parliament: Does Policy Shape Politics?
    The Influence of Interest Groups in the European Parliament: Does Policy Shape Politics? Maja Kluger Rasmussen A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, August 2012. Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 98,183 words. Abstract For a long time, the European Parliament (EP) was viewed as a lobbying sideshow mainly to be targeted if interest groups were unsuccessful at getting their demands included in the European Commission’s proposal. Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have a reputation for being particularly open to diffuse interests who, due to their limited resources, use ‘friendly’ MEPs to put pressure on the European Commission and the Council. The notion of the EP representing diffuse interests conflicts with the broader political science literature on interest groups, which dwells on business bias. There are, however, good reasons to doubt the EP’s reputation as a defender of diffuse interests. Much of our current knowledge about the EP’s interest group politics stems from a time when the EP’s legislative powers were more limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • 13 ES Diario Oficial De La Unión Europea C 182 E / 1
    27.6.2013 ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 182 E / 1 IV (Informaciones) INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA PARLAMENTO EUROPEO PREGUNTAS ESCRITAS FORMULADAS CON SOLICITUD DE RESPUESTA ESCRITA Preguntas escritas formuladas por los diputados al Parlamento Europeo y las respuestas de una de las instituciones de la Unión Europea (2013/C 182 E/01) Sumario Página P-005921/12 by Christel Schaldemose to the Commission Subject: Change to conclusions in a report on men's health in Europe Dansk udgave .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 English version .................................................................................................................................................................. 14 E-005922/12 by Cornelis de Jong, Bas Eickhout, Judith A. Merkies and Keith Taylor to the Commission Subject: Possible postponement of complete trade ban on cosmetics tested on animals Nederlandse versie ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 English version .................................................................................................................................................................. 17 E-005923/12 by Andrea Zanoni to the Commission Subject: Worrying persistence of the problem of malicious poisoning
    [Show full text]
  • STAES Bart OFFICE Dear Member of the European Parliament, Please
    STAES Bart OFFICE From: Inga Jesinghaus <[email protected]> Sent: 25 September 2013 14:01 Subject: Postponement of the decision in the European Parliament on the TPD Attachments: ABNR_letter_postponement TPD.pdf; ABNR_Positionen_7_2013_english.pdf Dear Member of the European Parliament, please find attached a letter of the German Smoke-Free Alliance (Aktionsbündnis Nichtrauchen - ABNR) concerning the postponement of the decision of the European Parliament on the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) as well as the Tobacco industry lobbyism. Please find enclosed also our detailed “Position on the Proposal for the Tobacco Products Directive” as presented in March 2013. Best Regards, Inga Jesinghaus Inga Jesinghaus Referentin Aktionsbündnis Nichtrauchen e.V. (ABNR) c/o Bundesvereinigung Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung e. V. (BVPG) Heilsbachstr. 30 D-53123 Bonn Telefon: +49 (0 ) 228 987 27 18 Fax: +49 (0) 228 64 200 24 Mobile: +49 (0) 151 17 22 78 99 [email protected] www.abnr.de 1 STAES Bart OFFICE From: Office DGP Berlin <[email protected]> Sent: 24 September 2013 14:35 To: QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve; DARTMOUTH William; ABELA BALDACCHINO Claudette; AGNEW John Stuart; ALBRECHT Jan Philipp; ALFANO Sonia; ALFONSI François; ALLAM Magdi Cristiano; ALVARO Alexander; ALVES Luís Paulo; ANDERSDOTTER Amelia; ANDERSON Martina; ANDREASEN Marta; ANDRES BAREA Josefa; ANDRIEU Eric; ANDRIKIENE Laima Liucija; ANGELILLI Roberta; ANGOURAKIS Charalampos; ANTINORO Antonello; ANTONESCU Elena Oana; ANTONIOZZI Alfredo; ARIAS ECHEVERRIA Pablo; ARLACCHI Pino;
    [Show full text]
  • En En Report
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting A7-0464/2013 18.12.2013 REPORT on reindustrialising Europe to promote competitiveness and sustainability (2013/2006(INI)) Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Rapporteur: Reinhard Bütikofer RR\1013732EN.doc PE510.843v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_INI CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION............................................ 3 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 32 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE ................................... 36 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS............ 42 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY....................................................................................................................... 47 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION......................................................................................................................... 53 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT............................... 58 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN’S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY63 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE ...................................................................... 67 PE510.843v02-00 2/67 RR\1013732EN.doc EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on reindustrialising Europe to promote competitiveness and sustainability (2013/2006(INI)) The European Parliament , – having regard to
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the European Parliament 1
    10-03-2011 EN Debates of the European Parliament 1 THURSDAY, 10 MARCH 2011 IN THE CHAIR: MIGUEL ANGEL MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ Vice-President 1. Opening of the sitting (The sitting was opened at 09:00) 2. Media law in Hungary (motions for resolutions tabled): see Minutes 3. Respect of national wage and retirement-setting mechanisms (debate) President. – The first item is the Commission statement on respect of national wage and retirement-setting mechanisms. Johannes Hahn, Member of the Commission. – Mr President, I would like to thank honourable Members for this opportunity to dispel some widely held misunderstandings regarding the Irish programme. The S&D Group’s question that gave rise to this statement raises honourable Members’ concern that certain economic policy conditions set out in the Memorandum of Understanding of the Economic Adjustment Programme for Ireland are in legal conflict with Article 153(5) of the Treaty. That paragraph excludes the adoption of provisions in the field of pay under Article 153, that is, in the field of social policy. However, the Economic Adjustment Programme for Ireland is not a social policy programme and is not adopted under Article 153. It is a financial assistance programme set up, together with the Irish Government, to restore domestic and external confidence and remove the harmful feedback loops between the fiscal and financial crisis. Therefore, it is grounded in Article 122(2) of the Treaty, which allows for Union financial assistance if a Member State is seriously threatened with severe difficulties caused by exceptional occurrences beyond its control. The role of the MOU is to specify the economic policy conditions that serve as a benchmark for assessing the Irish policy performance during the financial assistance programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from European Gender Quotas
    WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT AND THE PIPELINE TO POWER: LESSONS FROM EUROPEAN GENDER QUOTAS Julie C. Suk* 2012 MICH. ST. L. REV. 1797 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. LEAKY PIPELINE: GENDER DISPARITIES AT THE TOP OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ........................................................................... 1797 II. GENDER QUOTAS: AN EMERGING EUROPEAN TREND ...................... 1802 Ill. COMPLETING THE REVOLUTION IN SOCIAL REPRODUCTION ............ 1805 IV. CRITICAL INSIGHTS FOR THE UNITED STATES ................................... l811 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................ 1814 I. LEAKY PIPELINE: GENDER DISPARITIES AT THE TOP OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION Despite the fact that women have entered law school in roughly equal numbers to men for two decades, gender disparities at the top of the profes­ sion remain. Women make up 19.5% of partners at the largest law firms, and 11% of the largest law firms have no women at all on their governing committees.' Only 23% of all federal judgeships are held by women, and 27% of state judgeships are held by women.2 Women constitute 20.6% of law school deans and 29.9% of full tenured law professors.3 Gender parity has been achieved at the entry point, but not at the top. The gender disparities at the top of the legal profession can be de­ scribed as a "leaky pipeline" problem. In 1993, women constituted 50.4% of J.D. students.4 In 2011, women made up 47.2% of J.D. students, and they * Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, and Visiting Professor, Harvard Law School. I. Catalyst Quick Take: Women in Law in the US., CATALYST (Oct. 17, 2012), http://catalyst.org/publication/246/women-in-law-in-the-us.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Measures to Tackle Youth Unemployment
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EN FORM FOR TABLING A PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION ORAL QUESTIONS WRITTEN QUESTIONS To be put to: To be put to: COUNCIL PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL COMMISSION COUNCIL COMMISSION VICE-PRESIDENT / HIGH REPRESENTATIVE Question for oral answer Question for written answer (Rule 117) with debate (Rule 115) Priority question (Rule 117(4)) Question Time (Rule 116) AUTHOR(S): Angelilli Roberta, Jimenez-Becerril Barrio Teresa, Basescu Elena, Papanikolaou Georgios, Becker Heinz, Melo Nuno, Jazlowiecka Danuta SUBJECT: Information on measures to tackle youth unemployment. (please specify) TEXT: On 30 January, during the informal summit of the European Council, the Commission set up eight «Action teams» to sent to the eight European countries with the highest rates of youth unemployment (Italy, Spain, Greece, Slovakia, Lithuania, Portugal, Latvia and Ireland) announcing that 82 billion euros of unassigned European funds to be committed to initiatives for youth unemployment. On 23 May President Barroso presented the first results of the «action teams» through which about € 7.3 billion of EU funds have been targeted for accelerated delivery or reallocation through this initiative, with at least 460 000 young people and 56 000 SMEs likely to benefit. Can the Commission tell us: - If there is an update on the work done by the «Action Teams» and the consultations with the other 7 countries with a youth unemployment rate above the EU average (Bulgaria, Cyprus, France, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Sweden); - If there is more precise and recent
    [Show full text]
  • Parlamento Europeo
    25.7.2013 ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 211 E / 1 IV (Informaciones) INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA PARLAMENTO EUROPEO PREGUNTAS ESCRITAS FORMULADAS CON SOLICITUD DE RESPUESTA ESCRITA Preguntas escritas formuladas por los diputados al Parlamento Europeo y las respuestas de una de las instituciones de la Unión Europea (2013/C 211 E/01) Sumario Página E-000325/12 by Francisco Sosa Wagner to the Commission Subject: Damage caused by open-cast mining Versión española ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 English version .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 E-000705/12 by Liam Aylward to the Commission Subject: Data protection for EU citizens and public health research English version .................................................................................................................................................................. 13 P-000709/12 by Dominique Vlasto to the Commission Subject: Classification of volunteer firefighters' activities as an occupation Version française ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 English version .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Europski Parlament
    25.7.2013. HR Službeni list Europske unije C 211 E / 1 IV (Obavijesti) OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE EUROPSKI PARLAMENT PISANA PITANJA S ODGOVOROM Pisana pitanja zastupnika Europskog parlamenta i odgovori institucije Europske unije na njih (2013/C 211 E/01) Sadržaj Stranica E-000325/12 by Francisco Sosa Wagner to the Commission Subject: Damage caused by open-cast mining Versión española ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 English version .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 E-000705/12 by Liam Aylward to the Commission Subject: Data protection for EU citizens and public health research English version .................................................................................................................................................................. 13 P-000709/12 by Dominique Vlasto to the Commission Subject: Classification of volunteer firefighters' activities as an occupation Version française ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 English version .................................................................................................................................................................. 15 E-000729/12
    [Show full text]