DOCSLIB.ORG

Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%). Lithuania 20 crucial climate and energy votes that took place Luxembourg 21 More information on the choice of votes and during the 2009-2014 parliamentary term. Malta 22 details of each vote (e.g. content, context, refer- Netherlands 23 The votes in question cover proposals to improve ences) can be found in the Scorecards Background Poland 24 the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme, the Mecha- Document. Portugal 25 nism for Monitoring and Reporting emissions, To view and download the scorecards and other Romania 26 the 2030 renewable energy and energy savings documents, visit: Slovakia 27 targets, the 2020 greenhouse gas emission reduc- Slovenia 28 tions target, the 2030 greenhouse gas emission www.caneurope.org/VoteForClimateAction Spain 29 reduction target, renewable energy policies, en- Sweden 31 ergy savings policies, the European support to the United Kingdom 32 international climate negotiations, the integration Political Groups 34 of climate change in EU development policies and provision of international climate finance. CAN Europe gratefully acknowl- edges support from the Europe- an Commission. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of CAN Europe and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action Austria RANKING OF NATIONAL RANKING OF ABOUT POLITICAL PARTIES PARLIAMENTARIANS Regardless of their words and promises, based on 2009-2014 voting records it is the voting behavior of Members on climate and energy policies VERY GOOD of the European Parliament that really 100% Eva LICHTENBERGER (GRÜNE) shows what they and their national po- VERY GOOD 100% Ulrike LUNACEK (GRÜNE) litical parties are actually supporting. 90% Angelika WERTHMANN (–) As we approach the 2014 European Die Grünen - Die 90% Evelyn REGNER (SPÖ) Parliamentary elections, Climate Action 100% Grüne Alternative 90% Karin KADENBACH (SPÖ) Network Europe provides you with this (GRÜNE) Greens/EFA 90% Martin EHRENHAUSER (–) analysis on how political parties and 2 88% Josef WEIDENHOLZER* (SPÖ) their parliamentarians have voted in the 80% Hans-Peter MARTIN (MARTIN) last five years. The scorecard helps in Sozialdemokratische 80% Jörg LEICHTFRIED (SPÖ) understanding who has supported more 83% Partei Österreichs 78% Heinz K. BECKER* (ÖVP) adequate climate action in Europe. (SPÖ) S&D The scorecards reflect how European par- 5 GOOD liamentarians have voted on ten climate 70% Elisabeth KÖSTINGER (ÖVP) Liste “Dr. Martin - für and energy issues during the 2009-2014 70% Hannes SWOBODA (SPÖ) Demokratie, Kontrolle, parliamentary term.** Parliamentarians 70% Othmar KARAS (ÖVP) 80% Gerechtigkeit” were given a point when voting in favor 70% Richard SEEBER (ÖVP) (MARTIN) NM of more ambitious climate and energy 67% Hubert PIRKER* (ÖVP) 1 policies, or no point if they didn't (includ- 50% Paul RÜBIG (ÖVP) ing cases where they did not vote). GOOD VERY BAD The scores of all parliamentarians were Österreichische 20% Franz OBERMAYR (FPÖ) allocated to the different national politi- 65% Volkspartei (ÖVP) EPP 13% Ewald STADLER* (BZÖ) cal parties they represent. 6 10% Andreas MÖLZER (FPÖ) For ease of use, all scores were labeled 0% Ernst STRASSER* (ÖVP) according to the amount of positive 0% Hella RANNER* (ÖVP) votes: very good ( 75-100%), good VERY BAD ( 50-74%), bad ( 25-49%), and very bad ( 0-24%). Freiheitliche Partei 15% Österreichs (FPÖ) NM For more detailed information, please 2 consult our full Scorecards Back- ground Document and Scorecards Analysis at www.caneurope.org/ Bündnis Zukunft VoteForClimateAction Österreich (BZÖ) NM 13% * This person has not been an MEP for the com- 1 plete 2009-2014 term. ** The votes cover the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme, the 2020 and 2030 greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, renewable energy policies, energy efficiency policies, the interna- tional climate negotiations, climate in develop- ment policies, international climate finance and the Mechanism for Monitoring and Reporting. EUROPEAN POLITICAL GROUP MEMBERSHIP ALDE Alliance Greens/EFA of Liberals and Greens/European Democrats for Europe Free Alliance ECR European GUE/NGL European Conservatives and United Left – Nordic Reformists Green Left EFD Europe of NM Non-attached Freedom and Members Democracy S&D Progressive EPP European Alliance of Socialists People’s Party and Democrats More Information: www.caneurope.org/VoteForClimateAction 2 Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action Belgium RANKING OF NATIONAL ABOUT POLITICAL PARTIES Christlich Soziale Partei Regardless of their words and promises, based on 2009-2014 voting records 60% (CSP) EPP it is the voting behavior of Members on climate and energy policies 1 of the European Parliament that really shows what they and their national po- VERY GOOD litical parties are actually supporting. Christen-Democratisch As we approach the 2014 European Socialistische & Vlaams 50% Parliamentary elections, Climate Action Partij.Anders (SP.A) S&D (CD&V) EPP 100% Network Europe provides you with this 2 3 analysis on how political parties and their parliamentarians have voted in the BAD Groen last five years. The scorecard helps in 100% (GROEN) Greens/EFA Lijst Dedecker understanding who has supported more 1 30% (DEDECKER) ECR adequate climate action in Europe. 1 The scorecards reflect how European par- ECOLO liamentarians have voted on ten climate 85% (ECOLO) Greens/EFA and energy issues during the 2009-2014 VERY BAD 2 parliamentary term.** Parliamentarians Vlaams Belang were given a point when voting in favor 0% (VB) NM of more ambitious climate and energy Parti Socialiste (PS) S&D 1 policies, or no point if they didn't (includ- 3 83% ing cases where they did not vote). The scores of all parliamentarians were allocated to the different national politi- Nieuw-Vlaamse RANKING OF cal parties they represent. 80% Alliantie PARLIAMENTARIANS (N-VA) Greens/EFA For ease of use, all scores were labeled 1 according to the amount of positive VERY GOOD votes: very good ( 75-100%), good 100% Bart STAES (GROEN) GOOD ( 50-74%), bad ( 25-49%), and very 100% Dirk STERCKX* (OPEN VLD) bad ( 0-24%). Centre Démocrate 100% Kathleen VAN BREMPT (SP.A) 70% Humaniste 100% Saïd EL KHADRAOUI (SP.A) For more detailed information, please (CDH) EPP 90% Marc TARABELLA* (PS) consult our full Scorecards Back- 1 90% Philippe LAMBERTS (ECOLO) ground Document and Scorecards 83% Mark DEMESMAEKER* (NV-A) Analysis at www.caneurope.org/ Open Vlaamse Liberalen 80% Frédéric DAERDEN (PS) VoteForClimateAction 67% en Democraten 80% Guy VERHOFSTADT (OPEN VLD) (OPEN VLD) ALDE * This person has not been an MEP for the com- 80% Isabelle DURANT (ECOLO) 3 plete 2009-2014 term. 80% Véronique DE KEYSER (PS) ** The votes cover the EU’s Emissions Trading Mouvement 75% Frieda BREPOELS* (NV-A) Scheme, the 2020 and 2030 greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, renewable energy 65% Réformateur policies, energy efficiency policies, the interna- (MR) ALDE GOOD tional climate negotiations, climate in develop- 2 70% Anne DELVAUX (CDH) ment policies, international climate finance and 70% Ivo BELET (CD&V) the Mechanism for Monitoring and Reporting. 70% Louis MICHEL (MR) EUROPEAN POLITICAL GROUP MEMBERSHIP 67% Philippe DE BACKER* (OPEN VLD) ALDE Alliance Greens/EFA 60% Frédérique RIES (MR) VERY BAD of Liberals and Greens/European 60% Marianne THYSSEN (CD&V) 20% Frank VANHECKE (–) Democrats for Europe Free Alliance 60% Mathieu GROSCH (CSP) 20% Jean-Luc DEHAENE (CD&V) ECR European GUE/NGL European 50% Annemie NEYTS-UYTTEBROECK 0% Philip CLAEYS (VB) Conservatives and United Left – Nordic (OPEN VLD) Reformists Green Left – – Jean-Claude MARCOURT* (PS) EFD Europe of NM Non-attached BAD Freedom and Members 30% Derk Jan EPPINK
Recommended publications
  • A Guide to CAP Reform Politics: Issues, Positions and Dynamics

    A Guide to CAP Reform Politics: Issues, Positions and Dynamics

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Zahrnt, Valentin Working Paper A guide to CAP reform politics: Issues, positions and dynamics ECIPE Working Paper, No. 03/2011 Provided in Cooperation with: European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), Brussels Suggested Citation: Zahrnt, Valentin (2011) : A guide to CAP reform politics: Issues, positions and dynamics, ECIPE Working Paper, No. 03/2011, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), Brussels This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/174846 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ECIPE WORKING PAPER • No. 03/2011 A GUIDE TO CAP REFORM POLITICS: ISSUES, POSITIONS AND DYNAMICS By Valentin Zahrnt Valentin Zahrnt is a Senior Fellow at the European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) and Editor of www.reformthecap.eu.

  • Green Deal – the Coordinators

    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels

    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels

    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
  • Bucharest Meeting Summary

    Bucharest Meeting Summary

    PC 242 PC 17 E Original: English NATO Parliamentary Assembly SUMMARY of the meeting of the Political Committee Plenary Hall, Chamber of Deputies, The Parliament (Senate and Chamber of Deputies) of Romania Bucharest, Romania Saturday 7 and Sunday 8 October 2017 www.nato-pa.int November 2017 242 PC 17 E ATTENDANCE LIST Committee Chairperson Ojars Eriks KALNINS (Latvia) General Rapporteur Rasa JUKNEVICIENE (Lithuania) Rapporteur, Sub-Committee on Gerald E. CONNOLLY (United States) Transatlantic Relations Rapporteur, Sub-Committee on Julio MIRANDA CALHA (Portugal) NATO Partnerships President of the NATO PA Paolo ALLI (Italy) Secretary General of the NATO PA David HOBBS Member delegations Albania Mimi KODHELI Xhemal QEFALIA Perparim SPAHIU Gent STRAZIMIRI Belgium Peter BUYSROGGE Karolien GROSEMANS Sébastian PIRLOT Damien THIERY Luk VAN BIESEN Karl VANLOUWE Veli YÜKSEL Bulgaria Plamen MANUSHEV Simeon SIMEONOV Canada Raynell ANDREYCHUK Joseph A. DAY Larry MILLER Marc SERRÉ Borys WRZESNEWSKYJ Czech Republic Milan SARAPATKA Denmark Peter Juel JENSEN Estonia Marko MIHKELSON France Philippe FOLLIOT Sonia KRIMI Gilbert ROGER Germany Karin EVERS-MEYER Karl A. LAMERS Anita SCHÄFER Greece Spyridon DANELLIS Christos KARAGIANNIDIS Meropi TZOUFI Hungary Mihaly BALLA Karoly TUZES Italy Antonino BOSCO Andrea MANCIULLI Andrea MARTELLA Roberto MORASSUT Vito VATTUONE i 242 PC 17 E Latvia Aleksandrs KIRSTEINS Lithuania Ausrine ARMONAITE Luxembourg Alexander KRIEPS Netherlands Herman SCHAPER Norway Liv Signe NAVARSETE Poland Waldemar ANDZEL Adam BIELAN Przemyslaw
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance

    European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance

    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
  • Nachrichten Aus Brüssel

    Nachrichten Aus Brüssel

    30 | BZB März 17 | Politik Nachrichten aus Brüssel menten in allen EU-Mitgliedsstaaten. Vorausge- gangen waren kontroverse Beratungen, in deren Malta übernimmt Ratsvorsitz Verlauf zum Teil heftige Kritik an der Geschäfts- und Preispolitik der Pharmaunternehmen geäu- Anfang Januar hat Malta für ein halbes Jahr den ßert wurde. Im Rahmen ihres Berichts stellen Ratsvorsitz in der Europäischen Union übernom- die Mitglieder des Gesundheitsausschusses eine men. Die Inselrepublik, die seit 2004 Mitglied Reihe von detaillierten Forderungen an die EU- der Gemeinschaft ist, hat zum ersten Mal die Mitgliedsstaaten und die Europäische Kommis- Ratspräsidentschaft inne. Für das kleine Land sion auf. So mahnen sie mehr Transparenz bei mit einer Gesamtbevölkerung von 433 000 Ein- der Festsetzung der Arzneimittelpreise und mehr wohnern ist dies eine organisatorische und vor Wettbewerb durch Generikaprodukte an. Ferner allem personelle Herausforderung. Inhaltlich sollen die Forschung und Entwicklung von Arz- setzen die Malteser auf Kontinuität, indem sie neimitteln intensiviert und der Rechtsrahmen die Politik der beiden vorherigen Ratspräsident- für den Patentschutz bei Medikamenten moder- schaften der Niederlande und der Slowakei fort- nisiert werden. Die Forderungen des Parlaments setzen. Ganz oben auf der Prioritätenliste stehen dürften nicht ungehört verhallen. Die Europäi- die Themen Migration, Binnenmarkt, Sicher- sche Union hat im Arzneimittelbereich unmittel- heit, soziale Eingliederung, Europas Nachbarn bare Gesetzgebungskompetenzen. und Maritimes.
  • RSCAS 2019/66Religion, European Elections and EU Politics. A

    RSCAS 2019/66Religion, European Elections and EU Politics. A

    RSCAS 2019/66 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Religion, European Elections and EU politics. A Resilient Second-Order Factor for a Second-Order Polity? François Foret and Emilie Mondo European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Religion, European Elections and EU politics. A Resilient Second-Order Factor for a Second-Order Polity? François Foret and Emilie Mondo EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2019/66 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper, or other series, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © François Foret and Emilie Mondo, 2019 Printed in Italy, September 2019 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes, projects and data sets, in addition to a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration, the expanding membership of the European Union, developments in Europe’s neighbourhood and the wider world.
  • En En Joint Motion for a Resolution

    En En Joint Motion for a Resolution

    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0236/2021 } B9-0237/2021 } B9-0250/2021 } B9-0251/2021 } B9-0252/2021 } RC1 28.4.2021 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 132(2) and (4) of the Rules of Procedure replacing the following motions: B9-0236/2021 (Verts/ALE) B9-0237/2021 (Renew) B9-0250/2021 (S&D) B9-0251/2021 (PPE) B9-0252/2021 (ECR) on Russia, the case of Alexei Navalny, the military build-up on Ukraine’s border and Russian attacks in the Czech Republic (2021/2642(RSP)) Michael Gahler, Željana Zovko, Andrius Kubilius, Sandra Kalniete, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Andrzej Halicki, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Miriam Lexmann, David Lega, Rasa Juknevičienė, Jerzy Buzek, Riho Terras, Arba Kokalari, Tomáš Zdechovský, Luděk Niedermayer, Vladimír Bilčík, Traian Băsescu, Jiří Pospíšil, Stanislav Polčák, Eugen Tomac, Michaela Šojdrová on behalf of the PPE Group RC\1230259EN.docx PE692.492v01-00 } PE692.493v01-00 } PE692.506v01-00 } PE692.507v01-00 } PE692.508v01-00 } RC1 EN United in diversityEN Marek Belka, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Tonino Picula on behalf of the S&D Group Bernard Guetta, Petras Auštrevičius, Dita Charanzová, Olivier Chastel, Vlad Gheorghe, Klemen Grošelj, Moritz Körner, Dragoș Pîslaru, Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Michal Šimečka, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Ramona Strugariu, Dragoş Tudorache on behalf of the Renew Group Sergey Lagodinsky on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Anna Fotyga, Veronika Vrecionová, Ruža Tomašić, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Elżbieta Rafalska, Hermann Tertsch, Charlie
  • 0423 MINUTES of the Meeting of 23 April 2013, from 16.45 to 17.45

    0423 MINUTES of the Meeting of 23 April 2013, from 16.45 to 17.45

    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia DSAS_PV(2013)0423 MINUTES of the meeting of 23 April 2013, from 16.45 to 17.45 Brussels The meeting opened at 16.45 on Tuesday, 23 April 2013, with Jean Lambert (Chair) in the chair. 1. Adoption of the draft agenda The agenda was adopted. 2. Adoption of the minutes of 19 March 2013 The minutes were adopted. 3. Announcements by the Chair The Chair made the following points: 1) Conference of Delegation Chairs I would like to report back to Members on the last Conference of Delegation Chairs meeting which was held in Strasbourg last week. It is concerning to note the increasing number of decisions which are being taken by the Secretary General without debate. The most recent is on the availability of interpreters for delegation meetings which have been allocated Thursday afternoons as a viable time. Unfortunately, as we are well aware, most Members need to return to their national constituencies by Thursday afternoons, so this is not a viable option for the delegation. This is a concerning development as it limits the participation of Members and staff who rely on the interpreters services. Ongoing issues remain regarding the budget and travel allowance for delegations, and the fact that this does not adequately take into account multi-country delegations or those with PV\935068EN.doc PE510.439v01-00 EN United in diversity EN countries who cannot easily conduct visits to Brussels. This is possibly something Members could discuss with their Group Presidents, and I will continue to follow up within the Conference of Delegation Chairs.
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament

    Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament

    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2

    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2

    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.