Handbook on Promoting Women's Participation in Political Parties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Handbook on Promoting Women's Participation in Political Parties Handbook on Promoting Women’s Participation in Political Parties handbook on promoting women’s participation in political parties Published by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Ul. Miodowa 10 00–251 Warsaw Poland www.osce.org/odihr © OSCE/ODIHR 2014 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE/ODIHR as the source. ISBN 978-92-9234-888-5 Designed by Homework Cover photo credit: AP/Jae C. Hong Printed in Poland by Sungraf Table of contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgements 9 Chapter 1: Introduction 11 1.1. Status of women in political leadership and elected office in the OSCE region 12 1.2. Political parties as “gatekeepers” of democracy 15 1.3. Purpose of the handbook 17 1.4. “Women in Political Parties” project and handbook methodology 18 1.5. Target readership and structure of the handbook 21 Chapter 2: Why Advocate for Gender Equality and the Promotion of Women in Political Office? 25 Introduction to Chapter 2 26 2.1. Traditional arguments to support women’s political participation 27 2.2. Benefits for political party leaders 30 2.2.1. Improves a political party’s public image and reputation 31 2.2.2. Enhances party platforms and policy agendas 32 2.2.3. Strengthens political party electoral and/or campaign strategies 34 2.2.4. Combats falling party membership 36 4 2.3. Benefits for women in political parties 37 2.3.1. Expands the pool of women willing to run for public office 38 2.4. Benefits for society 40 2.4.1 Increases public trust in the political system 40 2.4.2. Impacts the policy agenda 40 2.4.3. Contributes to socio-economic development 41 2.4.4. Promotes better understanding of gender-equality issues in society 42 Conclusion to Chapter 2 43 Chapter 3: Political Parties and Political Party Leaders 45 Introduction to Chapter 3 46 3.1. What strategies work? 49 3.1.1. Institutionalizing gender equality within party structures, processes and practices 50 3.1.2. Adopting voluntary measures to support women’s political advancement 60 3.1.3. Ensuring gender-equal access to financial resources and campaign funds 76 3.1.4. Making gender a part of a party’s electoral strategy 78 3.1.5. Promoting gender-responsive governance at the national level 82 Conclusion to Chapter 3 87 Chapter 4: Women in Political Parties 89 Introduction to Chapter 4 90 4.1. What strategies work? 92 4.1.1. Building a successful career and promoting women through the ranks of politics 93 4.1.2. Co-operating with other women and acting collectively on issues of mutual concern 122 4.1.3. Institutionalizing gender equality in political party policies, processes and practices 129 Conclusion to Chapter 4 135 Table of contents 5 Chapter 5: Civil society organizations and other actors 137 Introduction to Chapter 5 138 5.1. What strategies work? 139 5.1.1. Encouraging women to enter politics and advance their political careers 140 5.1.2. Working with political parties 151 5.1.3. Shaping positive public attitudes 157 5.1.4. Working with the media 160 5.1.5. Working with academia 164 5.1.6. Working with executive and legislative powers 168 5.1.7. Staying abreast of latest developments 170 Conclusion to Chapter 5 171 Conclusion 173 Annexes 179 Bibliography 205 Foreword 7 Foreword Gender equality, including the equal participation of women and men in all aspects of politi- cal and public life, is a cornerstone principle to which all OSCE participating States have sub- scribed. The December 2009 OSCE Athens Ministerial Council adopted a Decision on Women’s Participation in Political and Public Life, calling on all participating States to “encourage all political actors to promote equal participation of women and men in political parties, with a view to achieving better gender-balanced representation in elected public offices at all lev- els of decision-making”. The Decision provided renewed momentum to objectives established by the OSCE participating States five years earlier in the 2004 OSCE Action Plan for the Promotion of Gender Equality. This Action Plan, adopted by all participating States of the OSCE, specifically mandates the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) “to assist participating States in developing effective measures to bring about the equal participation of women in democratic processes and assist in developing best practices for their implementation.” The current OSCE-wide rate of women’s representation in parliaments stands at almost 25 per cent, an increase from 15 per cent in 2000. This increase over the last decade, however, has been due largely to significant gains in a limited number of participating States, while overall progress remains uneven across the region. The extent of women’s representation in elected office in any given country is determined by a wide range of factors, including the general progress towards achieving equality of rights and opportunities among women and men in public and private spheres, the choice of po- litical and electoral systems, and the level of institutionalization of – and transparency in – decision-making processes within political parties. Nonetheless, within this complex set of factors, political parties are often referred to as the “gatekeepers” of women’s political partici- pation. Barriers such as direct or indirect gender-based discrimination in party procedures and practices, a lack of gender-sensitivity in candidate selection and outreach, or an inequitable distribution of party resources among candidates are some of the complex challenges faced by women within political parties and, in particular, by women candidates in their electoral campaigns. This Handbook on Promoting Women’s Participation in Political Parties aims at encouraging po- litical party leaders, men and women alike, to support the integration of gender aspects into internal political party decision-making processes. It also seeks to develop the capacity of women politicians to advance their political careers. The key finding that has emerged during the development of this handbook is that internal party reform is critical to women’s advance- 8 ment. A lack of internal party democracy and transparency, the absence of gender-sensitivity in candidate selection and outreach, as well as the failure to decentralize party decision-making processes, all inhibit women’s opportunities to advance as leaders within parties and as can- didates for elected office. To this end, the handbook provides a valuable overview of voluntary measures that political parties can adopt to enhance gender equality within party structures, processes, policies and activities, as a means to provide both women and men equal opportuni- ties to participate meaningfully in the political life of OSCE participating States. The drafting, review and production of this publication were competed almost entirely during the tenure of my predecessor as director of ODIHR, Ambassador Janez Lenarčič. While I have the privilege of presenting this resource, I must express my gratitude for the guidance he pro- vided in ensuring its publication. I am convinced that this handbook, written as a reader and a training tool, will motivate po- litical party leaders to ensure that internal party procedures and practices support the equal participation of both women and men in democratic governance processes, to the benefit of participating States across the OSCE region. Michael Georg Link Director OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Executive summary 9 Acknowledgements This handbook was prepared by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), on the basis of research conducted and drafts prepared by Professors Pippa Norris of Harvard University and Mona Lena Krook of Rutgers University, experts in promoting gender equality in political office. This publication would not have been possible without the information provided by gender and political party experts, women’s civil society organizations, and representatives of both political parties and parliaments from across the OSCE region. In particular, ODIHR would like to thank the members of the expert and consultative advisory groups established within the framework of ODIHR’s “Women in Political Parties” project, of which this handbook forms a part. These experts identified the key challenges confronting women in advancing their political careers, provided valuable examples of good practices for promoting women’s partici- pation within political parties and reviewed drafts of the handbook as it was prepared. Their input and feedback form the basis of this publication. In particular, ODIHR would like to thank Michelle Bekkering, Lolita Cigane, Ivan Doherty, Lenita Freidenvall, Maria Rauch Kallat, Sonja Lokar, Joni Lovenduski, Petra Meier, Karolina Ó Beacháin Stefanczak, Susan Scarrow, Melanie Sully, and Kristina Wilfore for their expert input and contributions to this handbook. ODIHR owes a debt of gratitude to its partners in the five pilot countries, including Jeta Katro of the Millennium Women’s Network (Albania), Elena Rusetskaia of the Women’s Information Centre (Georgia), Yevgenya Kozyreva of the Feminist League (Kazakhstan), Zulfia Kochorbaeva of the Social Technologies Agency (Kyrgyzstan) and Daniela Terzi-Barbarosie and Alexei Buzu of the Partnership Centre for Development (Moldova). The Office would also like to thank representatives of OSCE institutions
Recommended publications
  • Geschäftsbericht 2019 – 2021 (PDF)
    2019BIS 2021 GESCHÄFTSBERICHT Wir sind Freie Demokraten. Wir glauben, dass Deutschland jetzt einen Neustart braucht. Wir glauben, dass es moderner, digitaler und freier werden muss. Wir glauben an das große DER Potenzial unseres Landes. Wir sind bereit, Verantwortung dafür zu übernehmen. FREIEN DEMOKRATEN Liebe Parteifreundinnen und Parteifreunde, liebe Freunde und Verbündete der Freien Demokraten, die besonderen Zeiten, die den Zeitraum dieses Geschäftsberichts prägen, manifestieren sich nicht zuletzt im anstehenden Bundes- parteitag: Zum ersten Mal in der Geschichte der FDP findet er digital statt. Bereits der Bundesparteitag im Jahr 2020 wurde von der Michael Zimmermann Corona-Pandemie beeinflusst: Gemeinsam haben wir – ebenfalls erstmalig – erfolgreich einen hybriden Bundesparteitag durchgeführt. Dennoch freue ich 2019 mich schon jetzt sehr darauf, bald wieder einen Parteitag in Präsenz veranstalten zu können. Auch politisch war der Berichtszeitraum von besonderen Herausforderungen geprägt. Die größte Stärke der Freien Demokraten war dabei eine stabilisierende Konstante: Hoch motivierte und engagierte Mitglieder, die sich ehrenamtlich in Gremien wie Bundesfachausschüssen eingebracht, die sich in großer Zahl an der Weiterentwicklung unseres Leitbildes Anfang 2020 beteiligt und die durch ihre Mitarbeit an unserem Entwurf für das Bundestagswahlprogramm die programmatische Aufstellung der FDP geprägt haben. Herzlichen Dank dafür! Mit der zügigen Einrichtung von digitalen Ortsverbänden, Fachausschüssen und einer Wahl-Software für Untergliederungen, mit neuen Mitmach-Formaten wie „Neu@FDP“ für Neumitglieder und „Wir@FDP“ als Schulungsangebot sowie mit weiteren Investitionen in die Digitalisierung konnten wir zur Modernisierung der Parteiarbeit beitragen – auch und gerade in Pandemie-Zeiten. Unsere Position als Digitalpartei Nr. 1, wie sie uns in einer Analyse der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung bescheinigt wurde, wollen wir in Zukunft nicht nur halten, sondern noch weiter ausbauen.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    Annual Report 2016 The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe is THE WORLD’S LARGEST REGIONAL SECURITY ORGANIZATION working to ensure peace and stability for more than a billion people between Vancouver and Vladivostok. Cover photo: Monitoring Officers Maria Torelm and John Yuhas prepare to inspect weapons storage sites in eastern Ukraine, 1 June 2016. Photo by Evgeniy Maloletka 4 OSCE ANNUAL REPORT 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARY GENERAL 6 FIELD OPERATIONS 58 CHAIRMANSHIP 10 Regional solutions to regional challenges South-Eastern Europe 60 PERMANENT COUNCIL 24 South-eastern Europe Presence in Albania 62 FORUM FOR SECURITY CO-OPERATION 28 Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina 64 Mission in Kosovo 66 Mission to Montenegro 68 OSCE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY 31 Mission to Serbia 70 Mission to Skopje 72 SECRETARIAT 35 Conflict Prevention 36 Eastern Europe Transnational Threats 40 Mission to Moldova 74 Economic and Environmental Activities 42 Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 76 Combating Trafficking in Human Beings 46 Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine 80 Gender Equality 48 Observer Mission at the Russian Checkpoints Gukovo and Donetsk 82 OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HumAN RiGHTS 50 SOUTH CAUCASUS Office in Yerevan 84 HiGH COmmiSSIONER ON NATIONAL MINORITIES 54 CENTRAL ASIA Centre in Ashgabat 86 REPRESENTATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEdiA 56 Programme Office in Astana 88 Centre in Bishkek 90 Office in Tajikistan 92 Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan 94 ADVANCING SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION THROUGH PARTNERSHIPS 96 Asian and Mediterranean partners 97 Co-operation with International and Regional Organizations 99 ANNEXES 102 List of Abbreviations 102 Unified Budget 104 Contributions by participating States 105 Extrabudgetary pledges and expenditures 106 Staff 109 5 Message from the Secretary General As my second term as Secretary General draws to a close, I am proud to look back on how the OSCE has responded to a rapidly evolving security landscape and the growing array of threats and challenges facing our region in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • CDU/CSU, SPD, Dr
    Plenarprotokoll 19/2 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografscher Bericht 2. Sitzung Berlin, Dienstag, den 21. November 2017 Inhalt: Präsident Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble .......... 37 A kräfte an der NATO-geführten Maritimen Sicherheitsoperation SEA GUARDIAN im Glückwünsche zum Geburtstag der Abgeord- Mittelmeer neten Dr. Michael von Abercron und Uwe Drucksache 19/22 ...................... 43 D Schummer ........................... 38 C Dr. Ursula von der Leyen, Bundesministerin Erweiterung und Abwicklung der Tagesord- BMVg. 43 D nung. 38 D Wolfgang Hellmich (SPD) ............... 45 A Änderung von Ausschussüberweisungen .... 39 A Jan Ralf Nolte (AfD) .................... 45 D Tagesordnungspunkt 1: Alexander Graf Lambsdorf (FDP) ......... 46 C a) Antrag der Fraktionen CDU/CSU, SPD, Dr. Alexander S. Neu (DIE LINKE) ........ 47 C AfD, FDP und BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜ- Dr. Tobias Lindner (BÜNDNIS 90/ NEN: Einsetzung eines Hauptausschus- DIE GRÜNEN) ...................... 48 B ses, eines Petitionsausschusses sowie eines Ausschusses für Wahlprüfung, Im- Jürgen Hardt (CDU/CSU) ................ 49 B munität und Geschäftsordnung Gabi Weber (SPD) ..................... Drucksache 19/85 ................... 39 B 50 A b) Antrag der Fraktion DIE LINKE: Einset- Dr. Reinhard Brandl (CDU/CSU) .......... 50 D zung von Ausschüssen Drucksache 19/78 ................... 39 B Tagesordnungspunkt 3: Michael Grosse-Brömer (CDU/CSU) ....... 39 B Antrag der Bundesregierung: Fortsetzung Carsten Schneider (Erfurt) (SPD) .......... 40 A des Einsatzes bewafneter deutscher Streit- kräfte zur Verhütung und Unterbindung Dr. Bernd Baumann (AfD) ............... 40 D terroristischer Handlungen durch die Ter- Dr. Marco Buschmann (FDP) ............. 41 A rororganisation IS auf Grundlage von Arti- kel 51 der Charta der Vereinten Nationen in Jan Korte (DIE LINKE) ................. 41 C Verbindung mit Artikel 42 Absatz 7 des Ver- Britta Haßelmann (BÜNDNIS 90/ trages über die Europäische Union und den DIE GRÜNEN) .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Conference Report of the 159Th Bergedorf
    159th bergedorf round table Berlin, 26 – 28 June 2015 cooperation along the new silk road Körber Foundation International Affairs August 2015 Cooperation along the new Silk Road Executive Summary • For the time being, China’s new Silk Road constitutes a broad conceptual framework for enhanced cooperation between the countries involved in the initiative, which still lacks precisely defined standards, regulations, and structures. Proponents point out that the new Silk Road will provide mutual benefits for everyone involved and that it provides for cooperation “on an equal footing.” In contrast, critics argue that the initiative is a means of enforcing economic and political interests. • The EU should more clearly define its (economic) policy objectives in the context of the new Silk Road. The EU needs to move from a “fast follower” to a “first mover” on cooperation with China if the new Silk Road is to reflect European interests. • In view of the fraught state of current European-Russian relations, the conflict in Ukraine could have a negative impact on cooperation in the framework of the new Silk Road. • Although increased connectivity along the new Silk Road facilitates freight transport, it also increases the mobility of terrorist groups and organized criminals. In order to counter these threats, states along the new Silk Road will have to intensify inter- governmental cooperation and better utilize existing multilateral forums. The new Silk Road: More than just a Narrative? A number of participants welcomed the Chi- A number of participants stressed that the nese initiative to deepen economic coopera- new Silk Road represented little more than tion along the new Silk Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Drucksache 19/21376
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/21376 19. Wahlperiode 30.07.2020 Unterrichtung durch die Delegation der Bundesrepublik Deutschland in der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarates Tagung der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarates vom 21. bis 25. Januar 2019 in Straßburg Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite I. Delegationsmitglieder ........................................................................ 2 II. Einführung ......................................................................................... 5 III. Ablauf der 1. Sitzungswoche 2019 .................................................... 6 III.1 Wahlen und Geschäftsordnungsfragen ................................................ 7 III.2 Schwerpunkte der Beratungen ............................................................. 8 III.3 Auswärtige Redner .............................................................................. 20 IV. Tagesordnung der 1. Sitzungswoche 2019 ....................................... 24 V. Verabschiedete Empfehlungen und Entschließungen .................... 29 VI. Reden deutscher Delegationsmitglieder ........................................... 69 VII. Berichterstattermandate deutscher Mitglieder ............................... 79 VIII. Funktionsträgerinnen und -träger in der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarates ........................................................ 80 IX. Sitzung des Ständigen Ausschusses in Helsinki............................... 82 X. Mitgliedsländer des Europarates ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2021 Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas Vaida Lilionyte Manthos West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Manthos, Vaida Lilionyte, "Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas" (2021). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 8290. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/8290 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Energy Policy Dynamics in the European Parliament and in the Lithuanian Seimas Vaida Lilionyte Manthos Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Science at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science John Kilwein, Ph.D., Chair Shauna Fisher, Ph.D. Erik S. Herron, Ph.D. Daniel Renfrew, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlene Laruelle
    Marlene Laruelle editor Central Asia Program Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies Elliott School of International Affairs The George Washington University NEW VOICES FROM CENTRAL ASIA: Political, Economic, and Societal Challenges and Opportunities VOLUME 1 Marlene Laruelle, editor Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, Central Asia Program, 2017 www.centralasiaprogram.org The volume “New Voices from Central Asia: Political, Economic, and Societal Challenges and Opportunities” gives the floor to a young generation of experts and scholars from Central Asia and Azerbaijan. They were fellows at GW's Central Asia-Azerbaijan Fellowship Program, which aims to foster the next generation of thought leaders and policy experts in Central Asia. The Program provides young professionals (policy experts, scholars, and human rights and democracy activists) with opportunities to develop their research, analytical, and communication skills in order to become effective leaders within their communities. The Program serves as a platform for the exchange of ideas and builds lasting intellectual networks of exchange between and amongst Central Asians and the U.S. policy, scholarly, and activist communities. It increases and helps disseminate knowledge about Central Asian viewpoints in both the United States and Central Asia. Central Asia Program Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies Elliott School of International Affairs The George Washington University For more on the Central Asia Program, please visit: www.centralasiaprogram.org. © 2017 Central Asia Program, The George Washington University. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Central Asia Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Kritische Analyse Des Handelsvertrages Der EU Mit Den
    Schriftenreihe „Arbeitspapiere für Marketing und Management“ Herausgeber: Prof. Dr. Christopher Zerres Hochschule Offenburg Fakultät Medien und Informationswesen Arbeitspapier Nr. 45 Kritische Analyse des Handelsvertrages der EU mit den Staaten des Mercosur Eine perspektivische Abschätzung der ökonomischen, ökologischen und politischen Konsequenzen Lorefice, S. / Zerres, T. / Zerres, C. Offenburg, November 2019 ISSN: 2510-4799 Impressum Prof. Dr. Christopher Zerres Hochschule Offenburg Fakultät Medien und Informationswesen Badstraße 24 77652 Offenburg ISSN: 2510-4799 Kritische Analyse des Handelsvertrages der EU mit den Staaten des Mercosur Inhalt Abkürzungsverzeichnis .......................................................................................................... 1 1 Einleitung ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Problemhintergrund ................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Ziel .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Aufbau..................................................................................................................... 5 2 Konzeptionelle Grundlagen ............................................................................................ 6 2.1 Europäische Union .................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Mercosur
    [Show full text]
  • Plenarprotokoll 19/167
    Plenarprotokoll 19/167 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografischer Bericht 167. Sitzung Berlin, Freitag, den 19. Juni 2020 Inhalt: Tagesordnungspunkt 26: Zusatzpunkt 25: a) Erste Beratung des von den Fraktionen der Erste Beratung des von den Fraktionen der CDU/CSU und SPD eingebrachten Ent- CDU/CSU und SPD eingebrachten Entwurfs wurfs eines Zweiten Gesetzes zur Umset- eines Gesetzes über begleitende Maßnah- zung steuerlicher Hilfsmaßnahmen zur men zur Umsetzung des Konjunktur- und Bewältigung der Corona-Krise (Zweites Krisenbewältigungspakets Corona-Steuerhilfegesetz) Drucksache 19/20057 . 20873 D Drucksache 19/20058 . 20873 B in Verbindung mit b) Erste Beratung des von der Bundesregie- rung eingebrachten Entwurfs eines Zwei- ten Gesetzes über die Feststellung eines Zusatzpunkt 26: Nachtrags zum Bundeshaushaltsplan Antrag der Fraktionen der CDU/CSU und für das Haushaltsjahr 2020 (Zweites SPD: Beschluss des Bundestages gemäß Ar- Nachtragshaushaltsgesetz 2020) tikel 115 Absatz 2 Satz 6 und 7 des Grund- Drucksache 19/20000 . 20873 B gesetzes Drucksache 19/20128 . 20874 A c) Antrag der Abgeordneten Kay Gottschalk, Marc Bernhard, Jürgen Braun, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion der AfD: in Verbindung mit Arbeitnehmer, Kleinunternehmer, Frei- berufler, Landwirte und Solo-Selbstän- Zusatzpunkt 27: dige aus der Corona-Steuerfalle befreien Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Dirk Spaniel, und gleichzeitig Bürokratie abbauen Wolfgang Wiehle, Leif-Erik Holm, weiterer Drucksache 19/20071 . 20873 C Abgeordneter und der Fraktion der AfD: d) Antrag der Abgeordneten Caren Lay, Deutscher Automobilindustrie zeitnah hel- Simone Barrientos, Dr. Gesine Lötzsch, fen, Bahnrettung statt Konzernrettung, Be- weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion richte des Bundesrechnungshofs auch in DIE LINKE: Clubs und Festivals über der Krise beachten und umsetzen die Corona-Krise retten Drucksache 19/20072 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Interest Groups in the European Parliament: Does Policy Shape Politics?
    The Influence of Interest Groups in the European Parliament: Does Policy Shape Politics? Maja Kluger Rasmussen A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, August 2012. Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 98,183 words. Abstract For a long time, the European Parliament (EP) was viewed as a lobbying sideshow mainly to be targeted if interest groups were unsuccessful at getting their demands included in the European Commission’s proposal. Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have a reputation for being particularly open to diffuse interests who, due to their limited resources, use ‘friendly’ MEPs to put pressure on the European Commission and the Council. The notion of the EP representing diffuse interests conflicts with the broader political science literature on interest groups, which dwells on business bias. There are, however, good reasons to doubt the EP’s reputation as a defender of diffuse interests. Much of our current knowledge about the EP’s interest group politics stems from a time when the EP’s legislative powers were more limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Unterzeichner Des Aufrufs an Den Deutschen Bundestag Und Die Deutsche Öffentlichkeit
    Stand 11. März 2020 Unterzeichner des Aufrufs an den Deutschen Bundestag und die deutsche Öffentlichkeit Ein Polendenkmal in der Mitte Berlins zum Gedenken an die polnischen Opfer der deutschen Besatzung 1939-1945 1. Dr. Felix Ackermann, Deutsches Historisches Institut Warschau 2. Renata Alt, MdB, Mitglied des Auswärtigen Ausschusses, Berlin 3. Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Aleida Assmann, Kulturwissenschaftlerin, Universität Konstanz 4. Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Jan Assmann, Ägyptologe, Universität Heidelberg / Konstanz 5. Prof. Dr. Martin Aust, Geschichte und Kultur Osteuropas, Universität Bonn 6. Prof. Dr. Klaus Bachmann, Universität für Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften Warschau 7. Anita Baranowska-Koch, Bartoszewski-Initiative, c/o Deutsch-Polnische Gesellschaft Berlin 8. Kurt Beck, Ministerpräsident a. D., Vorsitzender der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bonn 9. Marieluise Beck, Zentrum Liberale Moderne, Berlin 10. Volker Beck, MdB 1994-2017, Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, Berlin 11. Maik Beermann, MdB, CDU, Steimbke 12. Prof. Dr. Dieter Bingen, ehem. Direktor, Deutsches Polen-Institut Darmstadt 13. Dr. Jochen Böhler, Imre Kertész Kolleg, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena 14. Dr. Carsten Brodesser, MdB 15. Elmar Brok, Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments, Brüssel 16. Christian Buchholz, ehem. Schuldekan in der Evang. Landeskirche in Württemberg, Ev. Akademie Bad Boll 17. Frank Burgdörfer, Mitglied des Vorstandes der Europäischen Bewegung, Berlin 18. Viola von Cramon-Taubadel, MdB 2009 -2013, Vorsitz. Sonnenberg-Kreis St. Andreasberg 19. Dr. Max-Friedrich Dehmel, Ministerialrat a.D. und ehem. Generalsekretär des Komitee zur Förderung der deutsch-französisch- polnischen Zusammenarbeit e. V. ("Weimarer Dreieck"), Berlin 20. Dr. Detmar Doering, Publizist, z. Zt. Prag 21. Dr. Dr. h.c. Markus Dröge, Bischof d. Landeskirche Berlin-Brandenburg-schlesische Oberlausitz (EKBO) 22.
    [Show full text]