Handbook on Promoting Women's Participation in Political Parties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Handbook on Promoting Women's Participation in Political Parties Handbook on Promoting Women’s Participation in Political Parties handbook on promoting women’s participation in political parties Published by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Ul. Miodowa 10 00–251 Warsaw Poland www.osce.org/odihr © OSCE/ODIHR 2014 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE/ODIHR as the source. ISBN 978-92-9234-888-5 Designed by Homework Cover photo credit: AP/Jae C. Hong Printed in Poland by Sungraf Table of contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgements 9 Chapter 1: Introduction 11 1.1. Status of women in political leadership and elected office in the OSCE region 12 1.2. Political parties as “gatekeepers” of democracy 15 1.3. Purpose of the handbook 17 1.4. “Women in Political Parties” project and handbook methodology 18 1.5. Target readership and structure of the handbook 21 Chapter 2: Why Advocate for Gender Equality and the Promotion of Women in Political Office? 25 Introduction to Chapter 2 26 2.1. Traditional arguments to support women’s political participation 27 2.2. Benefits for political party leaders 30 2.2.1. Improves a political party’s public image and reputation 31 2.2.2. Enhances party platforms and policy agendas 32 2.2.3. Strengthens political party electoral and/or campaign strategies 34 2.2.4. Combats falling party membership 36 4 2.3. Benefits for women in political parties 37 2.3.1. Expands the pool of women willing to run for public office 38 2.4. Benefits for society 40 2.4.1 Increases public trust in the political system 40 2.4.2. Impacts the policy agenda 40 2.4.3. Contributes to socio-economic development 41 2.4.4. Promotes better understanding of gender-equality issues in society 42 Conclusion to Chapter 2 43 Chapter 3: Political Parties and Political Party Leaders 45 Introduction to Chapter 3 46 3.1. What strategies work? 49 3.1.1. Institutionalizing gender equality within party structures, processes and practices 50 3.1.2. Adopting voluntary measures to support women’s political advancement 60 3.1.3. Ensuring gender-equal access to financial resources and campaign funds 76 3.1.4. Making gender a part of a party’s electoral strategy 78 3.1.5. Promoting gender-responsive governance at the national level 82 Conclusion to Chapter 3 87 Chapter 4: Women in Political Parties 89 Introduction to Chapter 4 90 4.1. What strategies work? 92 4.1.1. Building a successful career and promoting women through the ranks of politics 93 4.1.2. Co-operating with other women and acting collectively on issues of mutual concern 122 4.1.3. Institutionalizing gender equality in political party policies, processes and practices 129 Conclusion to Chapter 4 135 Table of contents 5 Chapter 5: Civil society organizations and other actors 137 Introduction to Chapter 5 138 5.1. What strategies work? 139 5.1.1. Encouraging women to enter politics and advance their political careers 140 5.1.2. Working with political parties 151 5.1.3. Shaping positive public attitudes 157 5.1.4. Working with the media 160 5.1.5. Working with academia 164 5.1.6. Working with executive and legislative powers 168 5.1.7. Staying abreast of latest developments 170 Conclusion to Chapter 5 171 Conclusion 173 Annexes 179 Bibliography 205 Foreword 7 Foreword Gender equality, including the equal participation of women and men in all aspects of politi- cal and public life, is a cornerstone principle to which all OSCE participating States have sub- scribed. The December 2009 OSCE Athens Ministerial Council adopted a Decision on Women’s Participation in Political and Public Life, calling on all participating States to “encourage all political actors to promote equal participation of women and men in political parties, with a view to achieving better gender-balanced representation in elected public offices at all lev- els of decision-making”. The Decision provided renewed momentum to objectives established by the OSCE participating States five years earlier in the 2004 OSCE Action Plan for the Promotion of Gender Equality. This Action Plan, adopted by all participating States of the OSCE, specifically mandates the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) “to assist participating States in developing effective measures to bring about the equal participation of women in democratic processes and assist in developing best practices for their implementation.” The current OSCE-wide rate of women’s representation in parliaments stands at almost 25 per cent, an increase from 15 per cent in 2000. This increase over the last decade, however, has been due largely to significant gains in a limited number of participating States, while overall progress remains uneven across the region. The extent of women’s representation in elected office in any given country is determined by a wide range of factors, including the general progress towards achieving equality of rights and opportunities among women and men in public and private spheres, the choice of po- litical and electoral systems, and the level of institutionalization of – and transparency in – decision-making processes within political parties. Nonetheless, within this complex set of factors, political parties are often referred to as the “gatekeepers” of women’s political partici- pation. Barriers such as direct or indirect gender-based discrimination in party procedures and practices, a lack of gender-sensitivity in candidate selection and outreach, or an inequitable distribution of party resources among candidates are some of the complex challenges faced by women within political parties and, in particular, by women candidates in their electoral campaigns. This Handbook on Promoting Women’s Participation in Political Parties aims at encouraging po- litical party leaders, men and women alike, to support the integration of gender aspects into internal political party decision-making processes. It also seeks to develop the capacity of women politicians to advance their political careers. The key finding that has emerged during the development of this handbook is that internal party reform is critical to women’s advance- 8 ment. A lack of internal party democracy and transparency, the absence of gender-sensitivity in candidate selection and outreach, as well as the failure to decentralize party decision-making processes, all inhibit women’s opportunities to advance as leaders within parties and as can- didates for elected office. To this end, the handbook provides a valuable overview of voluntary measures that political parties can adopt to enhance gender equality within party structures, processes, policies and activities, as a means to provide both women and men equal opportuni- ties to participate meaningfully in the political life of OSCE participating States. The drafting, review and production of this publication were competed almost entirely during the tenure of my predecessor as director of ODIHR, Ambassador Janez Lenarčič. While I have the privilege of presenting this resource, I must express my gratitude for the guidance he pro- vided in ensuring its publication. I am convinced that this handbook, written as a reader and a training tool, will motivate po- litical party leaders to ensure that internal party procedures and practices support the equal participation of both women and men in democratic governance processes, to the benefit of participating States across the OSCE region. Michael Georg Link Director OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Executive summary 9 Acknowledgements This handbook was prepared by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), on the basis of research conducted and drafts prepared by Professors Pippa Norris of Harvard University and Mona Lena Krook of Rutgers University, experts in promoting gender equality in political office. This publication would not have been possible without the information provided by gender and political party experts, women’s civil society organizations, and representatives of both political parties and parliaments from across the OSCE region. In particular, ODIHR would like to thank the members of the expert and consultative advisory groups established within the framework of ODIHR’s “Women in Political Parties” project, of which this handbook forms a part. These experts identified the key challenges confronting women in advancing their political careers, provided valuable examples of good practices for promoting women’s partici- pation within political parties and reviewed drafts of the handbook as it was prepared. Their input and feedback form the basis of this publication. In particular, ODIHR would like to thank Michelle Bekkering, Lolita Cigane, Ivan Doherty, Lenita Freidenvall, Maria Rauch Kallat, Sonja Lokar, Joni Lovenduski, Petra Meier, Karolina Ó Beacháin Stefanczak, Susan Scarrow, Melanie Sully, and Kristina Wilfore for their expert input and contributions to this handbook. ODIHR owes a debt of gratitude to its partners in the five pilot countries, including Jeta Katro of the Millennium Women’s Network (Albania), Elena Rusetskaia of the Women’s Information Centre (Georgia), Yevgenya Kozyreva of the Feminist League (Kazakhstan), Zulfia Kochorbaeva of the Social Technologies Agency (Kyrgyzstan) and Daniela Terzi-Barbarosie and Alexei Buzu of the Partnership Centre for Development (Moldova). The Office would also like to thank representatives of OSCE institutions
Recommended publications
  • Public Contestation Practices in Russia in 2000–2020
    https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-9657.09.06 EASTERN REVIEW 2020, T. 9 Roman Savenkov https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-2444 Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia Department of Sociology and Political Science e-mail: [email protected] Public contestation practices in Russia in 2000–2020 Abstract. The article analyzes the influence exerted by the limitation of legal opportunities for public contestation in the 2000s on the scope of mobilization and the repertoire of public contestation practices. The term ‘public contestation’ is used to describe forms of individual and collective political activity focused on criticizing, denying and resisting the current government project, including by introducing alternative projects. The public contestation includes constructive actions of political actors not related to causing damage or disposing of political opponents. The paper is based on political and legal analysis and on some elements of event analysis. In the 2000s, the scale of public contestation on discursive and protest platforms was smaller than over the next decade, which did not create any needs for detailed regulation of such activities. At the same time, changes in political and legal opportunities in the electoral and party field were quite intense throughout 2000–2020. The most popular forms of public contestation were public events (in 2011–2018), as well as discursive activity on the Internet and in mass media (after 2018). During the above mentioned period, we see the biggest changes in legal opportunities in this field and increasing penalties for respective violations. The electoral field shows the pendulum dynamics: decreasing and increasing opportunities in 2000–2011 and 2012–2019, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary's Policy Towards Its Kin Minorities
    Hungary’s policy towards its kin minorities: The effects of Hungary’s recent legislative measures on the human rights situation of persons belonging to its kin minorities Óscar Alberto Lema Bouza Supervisor: Prof. Zsolt Körtvélyesi Second Semester University: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest, Hungary Academic Year 2012/2013 Óscar A. Lema Bouza Abstract Abstract: This thesis focuses on the recent legislative measures introduced by Hungary aimed at kin minorities in the neighbouring countries. Considering as relevant the ones with the largest Hungarian minorities (i.e. Croatia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Ukraine), the thesis starts by presenting the background to the controversy, looking at the history, demographics and politics of the relevant states. After introducing the human rights standards contained in international and national legal instruments for the protection of minorities, the thesis looks at the reasons behind the enactment of the laws. To do so the politically dominant concept of Hungarian nation is examined. Finally, the author looks at the legal and political restrictions these measures face from the perspective of international law and the reactions of the affected countries, respectively. The research shows the strong dependency between the measures and the political conception of the nation, and points out the lack of amelioration of the human rights situation of ethnic Hungarians in the said countries. The reason given for this is the little effects produced on them by the measures adopted by Hungary and the potentially prejudicial nature of the reaction by the home states. The author advocates for a deeper cooperation between Hungary and the home states. Keywords: citizenship, ethnic preference, Fundamental Law, home state, human rights, Hungary, kin state, minorities, nation, Nationality Law, preferential treatment,Status Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Political Science Review Vol. XXI, No. 1 2021
    Romanian Political Science Review vol. XXI, no. 1 2021 The end of the Cold War, and the extinction of communism both as an ideology and a practice of government, not only have made possible an unparalleled experiment in building a democratic order in Central and Eastern Europe, but have opened up a most extraordinary intellectual opportunity: to understand, compare and eventually appraise what had previously been neither understandable nor comparable. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review was established in the realization that the problems and concerns of both new and old democracies are beginning to converge. The journal fosters the work of the first generations of Romanian political scientists permeated by a sense of critical engagement with European and American intellectual and political traditions that inspired and explained the modern notions of democracy, pluralism, political liberty, individual freedom, and civil rights. Believing that ideas do matter, the Editors share a common commitment as intellectuals and scholars to try to shed light on the major political problems facing Romania, a country that has recently undergone unprecedented political and social changes. They think of Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review as a challenge and a mandate to be involved in scholarly issues of fundamental importance, related not only to the democratization of Romanian polity and politics, to the “great transformation” that is taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, but also to the make-over of the assumptions and prospects of their discipline. They hope to be joined in by those scholars in other countries who feel that the demise of communism calls for a new political science able to reassess the very foundations of democratic ideals and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Blogger Voice of Young People
    TALKING LANGUAGES In Sleepyville, Italy, there is a political conversation going on. The Slovenian minority of the city proposed, that lessons of Slovenian language should be obligatory for all secondary schools in the city. Many parties were against this proposal, since only 20% of the population are Slovenians. Parties proposed many different solutions. For example Italian Pirate party was putting its hopes for the future and proposing that everyone should learn Esperanto. They also suggested that we should form a council of children. The Liberal Economical party wanted us to think about the young people, whom council decision will most clearly affect. Feminist party was mainly happy to see so many female faces in the council and especially the gender of the mayor made them really happy. Italian Nationalists party thought, that if Italian kids would learn Slovenian, it would be easier for criminal Slovenian kids to sell them drugs. Meanwhile, the Workers party was again preparing for the revolution. During their speech, the mayor felt a bit insecure and the security was called. Twice the party members were told to back up from the mayor’s table. This seemed to confuse her so much, that she dozed off in some points of the conversation. Someone also told the Workers party members to smoke less weed. During the coffee brake an interesting suspicion was raised. The member of the APP, Oldrich Justa had been seen talking to the mayor before the council meeting. Some suggested corruption, but when asked about personal relationship between Justa and the mayor, the smile on his face couldn't have been wider.
    [Show full text]
  • Esposito & Zollo: “How Dare You Call Her a Pig, I
    “How dare you call her a pig, I know several pigs who would be upset if they knew”* A multimodal critical discursive approach to online misogyny against UK MPs on YouTube Eleonora Esposito and Sole Alba Zollo University of Navarra, Spain | University of Napoli Federico II, Italy On the occasion of the 2017 UK election campaign, Amnesty International conducted a large-scale, sentiment-based analysis of online hate speech against women MPs on Twitter (Dhrodia 2018), identifying the “Top 5” most attacked women MPs as Diane Abbott, Joanna Cherry, Emily Thornberry, Jess Phillips and Anna Soubry. Taking Amnesty International’s results as a starting point, this paper investigates online misogyny against the “Top 5” women MPs, with a specific focus on the video-sharing platform YouΤube, whose loosely censored cyberspace is known as a breeding ground for antagonism, impunity and disinhibition (Pihlaja 2014), and, therefore, merits investigation. By collecting and analysing a corpus of YouTube multimodal data we explore, critique and contextualize online misogyny as a techno-social phenomenon applying a Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS) approach (KhosraviNik and Esposito 2018). Mapping a vast array of discursive strategies, this study offers an in-depth analysis on how technology-facilitated gender-based violence contributes to discursively constructing the political arena as a fundamentally male-oriented space, and reinforces stereotypical and sexist representation of women in politics and beyond. Keywords: women MPs, misogyny, YouTube, multimodality, social media, Critical Discourse Studies * The authors discussed and conceived the paper jointly.Eleonora Esposito is responsible for Sections 2, 3.1 and 4.1 and Sole Alba Zollo is responsible for Sections 1, 3.2, 4.2 and 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Deep State
    #1.12 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES TURKEY’S DEEP STATE CULTURE INTERNATIONAL POLITICS ECOLOGY AKP’s Cultural Policy: Syria: The Case of the Seasonal Agricultural Arts and Censorship “Arab Spring” Workers in Turkey Pelin Başaran Transforming into the Sidar Çınar Page 28 “Arab Revolution” Page 32 Cengiz Çandar Page 35 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 ■ Feature articles: Turkey’s Deep State Tracing the Deep State, Ayşegül Sabuktay 4 The Deep State: Forms of Domination, Informal Institutions and Democracy, Mehtap Söyler 8 Ergenekon as an Illusion of Democratization, Ahmet Şık 12 Democratization, revanchism, or..., Aydın Engin 16 The Near Future of Turkey on the Axis of the AKP-Gülen Movement, Ruşen Çakır 18 Counter-Guerilla Becoming the State, the State Becoming the Counter-Guerilla, Ertuğrul Mavioğlu 22 Is the Ergenekon Case an Opportunity or a Handicap? Ali Koç 25 The Dink Murder and State Lies, Nedim Şener 28 ■ Culture Freedom of Expression in the Arts and the Current State of Censorship in Turkey, Pelin Başaran 31 ■ Ecology Solar Energy in Turkey: Challenges and Expectations, Ateş Uğurel 33 A Brief Evaluation of Seasonal Agricultural Workers in Turkey, Sidar Çınar 35 ■ International Politics Syria: The Case of the “Arab Spring” Transforming into the “Arab Revolution”, Cengiz Çandar 38 Turkey/Iran: A Critical Move in the Historical Competition, Mete Çubukçu 41 ■ Democracy 4+4+4: Turning the Education System Upside Down, Aytuğ Şaşmaz 43 “Health Transformation Program” and the 2012 Turkey Health Panorama, Mustafa Sütlaş 46 How Multi-Faceted are the Problems of Freedom of Opinion and Expression in Turkey?, Şanar Yurdatapan 48 Crimes against Humanity and Persistent Resistance against Cruel Policies, Nimet Tanrıkulu 49 ■ News from hbs 53 Heinrich Böll Stiftung – Turkey Representation The Heinrich Böll Stiftung, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Movement in Turkey
    #4.13 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES THE GREEN MOVEMENT IN TURKEY DEMOCRACY INTERNATIONAL POLITICS HUMAN LANDSCAPE AKP versus women Turkish-American relations and the Taner Öngür: Gülfer Akkaya Middle East in Obama’s second term The long and winding road Page 52 0Nar $OST .IyeGO 3erkaN 3eyMeN Page 60 Page 66 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 Q Feature articles: The Green Movement in Turkey Sustainability of the Green Movement in Turkey, Bülent Duru 4 Environmentalists in Turkey - Who are they?, BArë GenCer BAykAn 8 The involvement of the green movement in the political space, Hande Paker 12 Ecofeminism: Practical and theoretical possibilities, %Cehan Balta 16 Milestones in the Õght for the environment, Ahmet Oktay Demiran 20 Do EIA reports really assess environmental impact?, GonCa 9lmaZ 25 Hydroelectric power plants: A great disaster, a great malice, 3emahat 3evim ­ZGür GürBüZ 28 Latest notes on history from Bergama, ­Zer Akdemir 34 A radioactive landÕll in the heart of ÊXmir, 3erkan OCak 38 Q Culture Turkish television series: an overview, &eyZa Aknerdem 41 Q Ecology Seasonal farm workers: Pitiful victims or Kurdish laborers? (II), DeniZ DuruiZ 44 Q Democracy Peace process and gender equality, Ulrike Dufner 50 AKP versus women, Gülfer Akkaya 52 New metropolitan municipalities, &ikret TokSÇZ 56 Q International politics Turkish-American relations and the Middle East in Obama’s second term, Pnar DoSt .iyeGo 60 Q Human landscape Taner Öngür: The long and winding road, Serkan Seymen
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince William's Sadness Over Death of Edgbaston Pilot Shot Down by Elephant Poachers
    NEWS MIDLANDS NEWS FACEBOOK Prince William's sadness over death of Edgbaston pilot shot down by elephant poachers 13:00, 1 FEB 2016 UPDATED 13:28, 1 FEB 2016 BY BEN HURST Roger Gower died when his helicopter was machine gunned by criminals 168 SHARES http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/prince-williams-sadness-over-death-10818113 05/02/2016, 12:53 Page 1 of 20 Roger Gower killed in his helicopter The Duke of Cambridge has been left “saddened” by the death of Edgbaston helicopter pilot Roger Gower, shot dead by elephant poachers in Tanzania. Mr Gower, 37, was helping authorities in the African country track the criminals when they fired on his aircraft on Friday, the Friedkin Conservation Fund (FCF) said. The pilot managed to bring the helicopter down in the Maswa Game Reserve, near Serengeti National http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/prince-williams-sadness-over-death-10818113 05/02/2016, 12:53 Page 2 of 20 Park in the country’s north, but died from his wounds before he could be rescued. Three people have reportedly been arrested. William has been campaigning for years to try to stop the illegal trade in animal parts, particularly elephant ivory and rhino horn. Free Blog on Barcode, Epc Prince William, Duke of Cambridge meets a rescued elephant The Duke, who has visited southern Africa extensively, did not know Mr Gower but a Kensington http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/prince-williams-sadness-over-death-10818113 05/02/2016, 12:53 Page 3 of 20 Palace spokesman said: “The Duke was saddened that yet another life had been lost due to poaching.” More: Three arrests over Brummie helicopter pilot murder William is royal patron of the wildlife conservation charity Tusk Trust that works to secure a peaceful co- existence between Africa’s wildlife and its people.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia by Misha Savic
    Serbia by Misha Savic Capital: Belgrade Population: 7.2 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$11,430 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Independent Media 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 National Democratic Governance 4.00 4.00 3.75 4.00 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Local Democratic Governance 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Corruption 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.75 3.71 3.68 3.79 3.79 3.71 3.64 3.64 3.64 3.64 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]