DOCSLIB.ORG

Rapporteur2 : Michail ANGELOPOULOS, Grèce (L, PPE/CCE)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bureau du Congrès CG/BUR29(2019)421 24 octobre 2019 Vérification des pouvoirs des nouveaux membres Rapporteur2 : Michail ANGELOPOULOS, Grèce (L, PPE/CCE) Avant-projet de résolution .............................................................................................................................2 Résumé Les rapporteurs passent en revue les pouvoirs des nouveaux membres par rapport aux critères actuels de la Charte et des Règles et procédures du Congrès. Document soumis pour approbation au Bureau du Congrès le 28 octobre 2019 1 Ce document est classé confidentiel jusqu'après son examen par le Bureau du Congrès 2 L : Chambre des pouvoirs locaux / R : Chambre des régions PPE/CCE : Groupe du Parti Populaire Européen au Congrès SOC : Groupe Socialiste GILD : Groupe Indépendant et Libéral Démocratique CRE : Groupe des Conservateurs et Réformistes européens NI : Membre n’appartenant à aucun groupe politique du Congrès Tel ► +33 (0)3 8841 2110 Fax ► +33 (0)3 8841 2719 [email protected] CG/BUR29(2019)42 AVANT-PROJET DE RESOLUTION 1. En conformité avec la Charte et les Règles et procédures du Congrès, les pays mentionnés ci-après ont modifié la composition de leur délégation nationale en raison, soit de la perte de mandat soit de la démission de certains membres des délégations suivantes : Albanie, Allemagne, Arménie, Autriche, Belgique, Danemark, Espagne, Fédération de Russie, Irlande, Italie, Liechtenstein, Macédoine du Nord, Malte, Pays-Bas, Pologne, Royaume-Uni, Slovénie, Suède, Suisse, Turquie. 2. La situation des sièges vacants est la suivante : 12 sièges de représentants et 23 sièges de suppléants vacants sur un total de 648 sièges. Les pays concernés – Allemagne, Belgique, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Danemark, Espagne, Fédération de Russie, France, Irlande, Italie, Macédoine du Nord, Malte, Pologne, Portugal, Roumanie, Royaume-Uni, Suisse – sont invités à compléter leur délégation. 3. Les rapporteurs sur la vérification des pouvoirs proposent que le Congrès approuve les pouvoirs des membres des délégations nationales figurant dans l’annexe de cette résolution. Date d’export / export date : 24/10/2019 CURRENT AND PROPOSED DELEGATION MEMBERS / MEMBRES ACTUELS ET PROPOSÉS ALBANIA / ALBANIE - Seats / Sièges : 4 CHAMBER OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES / CHAMBRE DES POUVOIRS LOCAUX Representative / Représentant Mrs / Mme Majlinda BUFI SOC SP - Socialist Party Mayor, Roskovec Municipality Mr / M. Erion VELIAJ SOC SP - Socialist Party Mayor, Tirana municipality Substitute / Suppléant Mr / M. Dritan LELI SOC PS - Socialist Party Mayor, Vlore municipality Mrs / Mme Juliana MEMAJ SOC PS - Socialist Party Mayor, Ura Vajgurore municipality CHAMBER OF REGIONS / CHAMBRE DES RÉGIONS Representative / Représentant Mr / M. Sotiraq FILO SOC SP - Socialist Party Member, Regional Council of Korçë Mrs / Mme Valbona SAKO SOC PS - Socialist Party Member, Regional Council of Durres Substitute / Suppléant Mr / M. Aldrin DALIPI SOC SP - Socialist Party President, Regional council of Tirana Mrs / Mme Valentina HALITI SOC PS - Socialist Party Chairwoman, Regional Council of Diber Delegation Chair / Président de délégation Mr / M. Erion VELIAJ (Working Language : English / Anglais) Mayor, Tirana municipality Tel : +355672055982 Fax : E-mail : [email protected] Deputy Head of Delegation / Vice-Président de délégation Mrs / Mme Valbona SAKO (Working Language : English / Anglais) Member, Regional Council of Durres Tel : +35552222310 Fax : E-mail : [email protected] Delegation Secretary / Secrétaire de délégation Mrs / Mme Adelina FARRICI (Working Language : English / Anglais) Tel : +355682099889 Fax : E-mail : [email protected] 1 / 1 The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe / Le Congrès des pouvoirs locaux et régionaux du Conseil de l’Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex – Tél : +33 (0)3 88 41 21 10 – Fax : +33 (0)3 88 41 37 47 – [email protected] – www.coe.int/congress ARMENIA / ARMÉNIE - Seats / Sièges : 4 CHAMBER OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES / CHAMBRE DES POUVOIRS LOCAUX Representative / Représentant Mrs / Mme Diana GASPARYAN PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE Civil Contract Party Mayor of Vagharshapat (Ejmiatsin) Mr / M. Emin YERITSYAN PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE Non Party Councillor, Community of Parakar Substitute / Suppléant Mrs / Mme Jemma HARUTYUNYAN PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE Non Party Mayor, Amasia Community Mr / M. Vardan HOVHANNISYAN PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE RPA - Republican Party of Armenia Mayor of the City of Jermuk CHAMBER OF REGIONS / CHAMBRE DES RÉGIONS Representative / Représentant Mrs / Mme Alina HARUTYUNYAN* PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE RPA - Republican Party of Armenia Head, Community of Nor-Yerznka Mr / M. Davit KHAZHAKYAN* GILD-ILDG Bright Armenia Party Member of the City Council of Yerevan Substitute / Suppléant Mr / M. Kamo KAKOYAN* CRE-ECR PAP - Prosperous Armenia Party Mayor of Nor Kharbert Community Mrs / Mme Arevik LOKYAN* NI-NR ARF - Armenian Revolutionary Federation Councillor, City of Vanadzor Delegation Chair / Président de délégation Mr / M. Emin YERITSYAN (Working Language : English / Anglais) Councillor, Community of Parakar Tel : +37410574501 Fax : +37410575219 E-mail : [email protected] Deputy Head of Delegation / Vice-Président de délégation Mr / M. Vardan HOVHANNISYAN (Working Language : English / Anglais) Mayor of the City of Jermuk Tel : +37410574501 Fax : +37410575219 E-mail : [email protected] Delegation Secretary / Secrétaire de délégation Mrs / Mme Natalya LAPAURI (Working Language : English / Anglais) Tel : +37410574501 Fax : E-mail : [email protected] 2 / 37 The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe / Le Congrès des pouvoirs locaux et régionaux du Conseil de l’Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex – Tél : +33 (0)3 88 41 21 10 – Fax : +33 (0)3 88 41 37 47 – [email protected] – www.coe.int/congress AUSTRIA / AUTRICHE - Seats / Sièges : 6 CHAMBER OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES / CHAMBRE DES POUVOIRS LOCAUX Representative / Représentant Mr / M. Franz Xaver GRUBER PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE ÖVP - Austrian People's Party Member of the City Government of Innsbruck Mrs / Mme Gudrun MOSLER-TOERNSTROEM SOC SPÖ - Social Democratic Party Municipal councillor of Puch bei Hallein Mrs / Mme Pauline STERRER PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE ÖVP - Austrian People's Party Mayor of Rüstorf Substitute / Suppléant Mr / M. Andreas RABL GILD-ILDG FPÖ - Freedom Party of Austria Mayor of Wels Mrs / Mme Waltraud SCHWAMMER PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE ÖVP - Austrian People's Party Mayor of Dechantskirchen Mr / M. Hannes WENINGER SOC SPÖ - Social Democratic Party Councillor, Giesshübl CHAMBER OF REGIONS / CHAMBRE DES RÉGIONS Representative / Représentant Mrs / Mme Sonja LEDL-ROSSMANN PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE ÖVP - Austrian People's Party President of the Regional Parliament of Tirol Mr / M. Reinhart ROHR SOC SPÖ - Social Democratic Party President of the Carinthia Parliament Mr / M. Harald SONDEREGGER PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE ÖVP - Austrian People´s Party President of the Vorarlberg Parliament Substitute / Suppléant Mr / M. Peter FLORIANSCHUETZ SOC SPÖ - Social Democratic Party Member of the State Parliament of Vienna Mrs / Mme Doris KAMPUS SOC SPÖ - Social Democratic Party Member, Regional Parliament of Styria Mr / M. Gerhard KARNER PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE ÖVP - Austrian People's Party 2nd Vice-President of the Lower-Austria Regional Parliament Delegation Chair / Président de délégation Mr / M. Harald SONDEREGGER (Working Language : English / Anglais) President of the Vorarlberg Parliament Tel : +43557451130000 Fax : +43557451130095 E-mail : [email protected] Deputy Head of Delegation / Vice-Président de délégation Mrs / Mme Gudrun MOSLER-TOERNSTROEM (Working Language : English / Anglais) Municipal councillor of Puch bei Hallein Tel : +436641834636 Fax : E-mail : [email protected] 3 / 37 The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe / Le Congrès des pouvoirs locaux et régionaux du Conseil de l’Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex – Tél : +33 (0)3 88 41 21 10 – Fax : +33 (0)3 88 41 37 47 – [email protected] – www.coe.int/congress Delegation Secretary / Secrétaire de délégation Mrs / Mme Daniela FRAISS (Working Language : English / Anglais) Tel : +3222820680 Fax : E-mail : [email protected] Mr / M. Andreas GREITER (Working Language : English / Anglais) Tel : +435125082341 Fax : +435125082345 E-mail : [email protected] 4 / 37 The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe / Le Congrès des pouvoirs locaux et régionaux du Conseil de l’Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex – Tél : +33 (0)3 88 41 21 10 – Fax : +33 (0)3 88 41 37 47 – [email protected] – www.coe.int/congress BELGIUM / BELGIQUE - Seats / Sièges : 7 CHAMBER OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES / CHAMBRE DES POUVOIRS LOCAUX Representative / Représentant Mr / M. Marc COOLS GILD-ILDG MR - Mouvement Réformateur Conseiller communal d'Uccle Président, Association de la Ville et des Communes de la Région Bruxelles-Capitale Mrs / Mme Francoise DASPREMONT NI-NR PS - Parti socialiste Conseillère communale et échevine de Charleroi Mr / M. - ZZ REP CPL (BELGIUM) ZZ-ZZ Substitute / Suppléant Mr / M. Jean-Paul BASTIN PPE/CCE-EPP/CCE CDH - Centre Démocrate Humaniste Bourgmestre de Malmedy Mrs / Mme Frida BREPOELS NI-NR N-VA - Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie Bourgmestre de Bilzen Mr / M. - ZZ SUP CPL (BELGIUM) ZZ-ZZ Mr / M. - ZZ SUP CPL (BELGIUM) ZZ-ZZ CHAMBER OF REGIONS / CHAMBRE DES RÉGIONS Representative / Représentant Mrs / Mme Carla DEJONGHE GILD-ILDG Open VLD - Open Flemish Liberal Democrats Députée de la région de Bruxelles-Capitale Mr / M. Karl-Heinz LAMBERTZ SOC PS - Parti socialiste President of the Parliament
Recommended publications
  • Turkey's Deep State

    Turkey's Deep State

    #1.12 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES TURKEY’S DEEP STATE CULTURE INTERNATIONAL POLITICS ECOLOGY AKP’s Cultural Policy: Syria: The Case of the Seasonal Agricultural Arts and Censorship “Arab Spring” Workers in Turkey Pelin Başaran Transforming into the Sidar Çınar Page 28 “Arab Revolution” Page 32 Cengiz Çandar Page 35 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 ■ Feature articles: Turkey’s Deep State Tracing the Deep State, Ayşegül Sabuktay 4 The Deep State: Forms of Domination, Informal Institutions and Democracy, Mehtap Söyler 8 Ergenekon as an Illusion of Democratization, Ahmet Şık 12 Democratization, revanchism, or..., Aydın Engin 16 The Near Future of Turkey on the Axis of the AKP-Gülen Movement, Ruşen Çakır 18 Counter-Guerilla Becoming the State, the State Becoming the Counter-Guerilla, Ertuğrul Mavioğlu 22 Is the Ergenekon Case an Opportunity or a Handicap? Ali Koç 25 The Dink Murder and State Lies, Nedim Şener 28 ■ Culture Freedom of Expression in the Arts and the Current State of Censorship in Turkey, Pelin Başaran 31 ■ Ecology Solar Energy in Turkey: Challenges and Expectations, Ateş Uğurel 33 A Brief Evaluation of Seasonal Agricultural Workers in Turkey, Sidar Çınar 35 ■ International Politics Syria: The Case of the “Arab Spring” Transforming into the “Arab Revolution”, Cengiz Çandar 38 Turkey/Iran: A Critical Move in the Historical Competition, Mete Çubukçu 41 ■ Democracy 4+4+4: Turning the Education System Upside Down, Aytuğ Şaşmaz 43 “Health Transformation Program” and the 2012 Turkey Health Panorama, Mustafa Sütlaş 46 How Multi-Faceted are the Problems of Freedom of Opinion and Expression in Turkey?, Şanar Yurdatapan 48 Crimes against Humanity and Persistent Resistance against Cruel Policies, Nimet Tanrıkulu 49 ■ News from hbs 53 Heinrich Böll Stiftung – Turkey Representation The Heinrich Böll Stiftung, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation.
  • The Green Movement in Turkey

    The Green Movement in Turkey

    #4.13 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES THE GREEN MOVEMENT IN TURKEY DEMOCRACY INTERNATIONAL POLITICS HUMAN LANDSCAPE AKP versus women Turkish-American relations and the Taner Öngür: Gülfer Akkaya Middle East in Obama’s second term The long and winding road Page 52 0Nar $OST .IyeGO 3erkaN 3eyMeN Page 60 Page 66 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 Q Feature articles: The Green Movement in Turkey Sustainability of the Green Movement in Turkey, Bülent Duru 4 Environmentalists in Turkey - Who are they?, BArë GenCer BAykAn 8 The involvement of the green movement in the political space, Hande Paker 12 Ecofeminism: Practical and theoretical possibilities, %Cehan Balta 16 Milestones in the Õght for the environment, Ahmet Oktay Demiran 20 Do EIA reports really assess environmental impact?, GonCa 9lmaZ 25 Hydroelectric power plants: A great disaster, a great malice, 3emahat 3evim ­ZGür GürBüZ 28 Latest notes on history from Bergama, ­Zer Akdemir 34 A radioactive landÕll in the heart of ÊXmir, 3erkan OCak 38 Q Culture Turkish television series: an overview, &eyZa Aknerdem 41 Q Ecology Seasonal farm workers: Pitiful victims or Kurdish laborers? (II), DeniZ DuruiZ 44 Q Democracy Peace process and gender equality, Ulrike Dufner 50 AKP versus women, Gülfer Akkaya 52 New metropolitan municipalities, &ikret TokSÇZ 56 Q International politics Turkish-American relations and the Middle East in Obama’s second term, Pnar DoSt .iyeGo 60 Q Human landscape Taner Öngür: The long and winding road, Serkan Seymen
  • Transforming Socio-Natures in Turkey Landscapes, State and Environmental Movements

    Transforming Socio-Natures in Turkey Landscapes, State and Environmental Movements

    Transforming Socio-Natures in Turkey Landscapes, State and Environmental Movements Edited by Onur İnal and Ethemcan Turhan First published 2020 ISBN: 978-1-138-36769-2 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-429-42969-9 (ebk) 9 Coal, ash, and other tales The making and remaking of the anti- coal movement in Aliağa, Turkey Ethemcan Turhan , Begüm Özkaynak, and Cem İskender Aydın (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) 9 Coal, ash, and other tales The making and remaking of the anti-coal movement in Aliağa, Turkey Ethemcan Turhan, Begüm Özkaynak, and Cem İskender Aydın Situated 50 kilometers north of Turkey’s third-largest city, Izmir, Aliağa is home to shipbreaking and smelting facilities, oil refineries and massive coal-fired power plants. Aliağa Bay – located on the Aegean coast, with abundant scenic land- scapes, pristine waters, and archaeologically important sites – was initially desig- nated as a heavy industrial development zone by the 1961 Constitution. This was followed by the establishment of state-owned heavy industries, particularly dur- ing the 1980s; namely, PETKİM (petrochemicals) and TÜPRAŞ (oil refinery), despite the potential to develop tourism in the region. Small and medium-scale industries, such as shipbreaking, iron-steel smelting, and cement manufacturing flourished around these two large state-owned facilities, complementing them and serving the domestic and international strategic interests of Turkish gov- ernments and industrial groups. Industrial clustering around iron, steel, and cement was later supplemented with fossil fuel–based energy production facili- ties. Accompanying the years of state-led industrialization, a strong working class grew alongside the facilities in the region. The lack of cumulative impact studies coupled with a diverse set of state-led polluting investments was influential in turning Aliağa and its environs into an “ecological sacrifice zone” (Lerner, 2010).
  • Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-Party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others)

    Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-Party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others)

    Sustainable Governance Indicators SGI 2015 Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others) SGI 2015 | 2 Parties and Interest Associations Indicator Intra-party Democracy Question How inclusive and open are the major parties in their internal decision-making processes? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = The party allows all party members and supporters to participate in its decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are open. 8-6 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, all party members have the opportunity to participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are rather open. 5-3 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, a number of elected delegates participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are largely controlled by the party leadership. 2-1 = A number of party leaders participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are fully controlled and drafted by the party leadership. Denmark Score 8 Four of the political parties represented in the Danish parliament, the Liberal Party, the Social Democratic Party, the Social Liberal Party and the Conservative Party have existed for more than 100 years and have all regularly taken part in governments.
  • The Green Party of Germany: Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen [PDF]

    The Green Party of Germany: Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen [PDF]

    THE GREEN PARTY OF GERMANY BÜNDNIS 90 / DIE GRÜNEN 1. Historical Context and democratic structure of Germany The political structures that existed before a united German state emerged were dominated by relatively small political entities, which enjoyed varying degrees of political autonomy. The Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Federal Republic of Germany) is formally only 70 years old. Unsurprisingly, this history of federalism is represented in the Bundesrepublik as well. Today we have 16 federal states. This decentralization is one of the most important parts of our democracy. Berlin, as the capital, was and is the best symbol of Germany’s colourful past. West Berlin’s location deep within the territory of Eastern Germany made it an island of the Bundesrepublik (Western Germany). West Berlin has had a very special phase after WWII that was deeply intertwined with the Cold War. With the end of the Cold War, the two German states the German Democratic Republic or GDR (East Germany) and Bundesrepublik finally became a united state again. Today, Berlin with its 3.6 million inhabitants, is Germany’s biggest city, its capital and the place to be for culture, arts, lifestyle, politics and science. Germany’s democratic system is a federal parliamentary republic with two chambers: the Bundestag (Germany’s parliament) and the Bundesrat (the representative body of the federal states). Germany’s political system is essentially a multi-party system, which includes a 5% threshold (parties representing recognised national minorities, for example Danes, Frisians, Sorbs and Romani people are exempt from the 5% threshold, but normally only run in state elections).
  • Chapter 07: Political Parties

    Chapter 07: Political Parties

    Name: Class: Date: Chapter 07: Political Parties Multiple Choice 1. The Federalists supported a strong central government that would: a. oppose the ratification of the Constitution. b. encourage the development of commerce and manufacturing. c. encourage the development of cottage industries and the farming sector. d. support the two-party political system. e. encourage the development of the farming sector. 2. _____ is a process in which the popular support for and relative strength of the political parties shift and the parties are reestablished with different coalitions of supporters. a. Flipping b. Realignment c. Dealignment d. Tipping e. Segregation 3. The party in the electorate consists: a. of members who regard themselves as independents. b. of all the people who describe themselves as Democrats or Republicans. c. only of those members who are electoral candidates. d. exclusively of party identifiers. e. exclusively of party activists. 4. __________are party members who help to organize and oversee party functions and planning during and between campaigns, and may even become candidates for office. a. Party activists b. Party identifiers c. Party supporters d. Lobbyists e. Party-line voters 5. Identify a true statement about third parties in American politics. a. They enjoy more electoral success than major parties. b. Since they are less in number and variety, they are easy to classify. c. It is easier for them to campaign statewide than to appeal to voters in a smaller district. d. In all states, they need only a few signatures to place their candidates on the ballot. e. They have brought many political issues to the public's attention.
  • Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-Party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others) M O C

    Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-Party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others) M O C

    Parties and Interest Associations Report Intra-party Democracy, Association Competence (Business), Association Competence (Others) m o c . e b o d a . k c Sustainable Governance o t s - e g Indicators 2018 e v © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2018 | 1 Parties and Interest Associations Indicator Intra-party Democracy Question How inclusive and open are the major parties in their internal decision-making processes? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = The party allows all party members and supporters to participate in its decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are open. 8-6 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, all party members have the opportunity to participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are rather open. 5-3 = The party restricts decision-making to party members. In most cases, a number of elected delegates participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are largely controlled by the party leadership. 2-1 = A number of party leaders participate in decisions on the most important personnel and issues. Lists of candidates and agendas of issues are fully controlled and drafted by the party leadership. United States Score 9 There are two major parties, the Democratic and Republican parties, operating at the local, state and federal levels in nearly all areas of the country.
  • The Turkish Question

    The Turkish Question

    #3.13 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES THE TURKISH QUESTION DEMOCRACY ECOLOGY HUMAN LANDSCAPE Trade unions and deunionization Seasonal farm workers: Civil Death during ten years of AKP rule Pitiful victims or Kurdish laborers Mehmet Tarhan Aziz Çelik demanding equality? (I) Sayfa 58 Page 44 Deniz Duruiz Page 32 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 ■ Feature articles: The Turkish question Turkey’s Turkish identity question, Doğu Ergil 4 Well, what do Turks want? Ahmet İnsel 8 AKP’s approach to the Kurdish problem: One step forward, one step backward, Evren Balta Paker 12 The Turkish state’s GAP hocus-pocus, Mustafa Sönmez 16 Village guards: A “temporary” system ongoing for 26 years, Abdürrahim Özmen 20 “Turkishness contract” and Turkish left, Barış Ünlü 23 Feminists in the furnace of nationalism, İnci Özkan Kerestecioğlu 28 ■ Ecology Seasonal farm workers: Pitiful victims or Kurdish laborers demanding equality? (I) Deniz Duruiz 32 Urban transformation and law on disaster prevention: A pretext for lucrative investment, Yaşar Adnan Adanalı 37 Urban transformation policies and the irrepressible rise of TOKİ, Evrim Yılmaz 40 ■ Democracy Trade unions and deunionization during ten years of AKP rule, Aziz Çelik 44 The right to resist against the poverty and oppression, Ercan Kanar 49 ■ International Politics Turkey-EU Relations: What does Turkey want? Ulrike Dufner 51 ■ Culture Cultural policies on urban level: İstanbul model, Ayça İnce 53 ■ Barometer Turkey’s frailty of freedom of expression, Hüsnü Öndül 57 ■ Human Landscape Civil death, Mehmet Tarhan 58 ■ News from hbs 59 Heinrich Böll Stiftung – Turkey Representation The Heinrich Böll Stiftung, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation.
  • Party-Political Responses to the Alternative for Germany in Comparative Perspective

    Party-Political Responses to the Alternative for Germany in Comparative Perspective

    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Government and International Relations Faculty Government and International Relations Publications Department Spring 2020 Party-Political Responses to the Alternative for Germany in Comparative Perspective David F. Patton Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/govfacpub Part of the Political Science Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Government and International Relations Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government and International Relations Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. Party-Political Responses to the Alternative for Germany in Comparative Perspective Abstract In September 2017, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) became the first far-right party to join the Bundestag in nearly seventy years. Yet, it was not the first time that a challenger party entered the parliament to the chagrin of the political establishment. After introducing the AfD, the BHE, the Greens, and the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS), the article analyzes how established parties treated the newcomers and why they did so. This comparative perspective offers insights into the AfD’s challenge, how distinctive the policies toward the AfD have been, and why the established parties have dealt with the AfD as they have. Keywords Alternative for Germany (AfD), BHE, challenger parties, Greens, Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS), populist parties Disciplines Political Science Comments Originally published in German Politics and Society, Issue 134 Vol.
  • Governing Party Variable

    Governing Party Variable

    1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Appendix: Political categorization For this report, we grouped people into two political categories: those who support the governing political party (or parties) and those who do not. These categories were coded based on the party or parties in power at the time the survey was fielded, and on respondents’ answers to a question asking them which political party, if any, they identified with in their country.1 In countries where multiple political parties govern in coalition (as in many European countries), survey respondents who indicated support for any parties in the coalition were grouped together. In Germany, for example, where the center-right CDU/CSU governed with the center-left SPD at the time of the survey, supporters of all three parties were grouped together. In countries where different political parties occupy the executive and legislative branches of government, the party holding the executive branch was considered the governing party. Survey respondents who did not indicate support for any political party, or who refused to identify with one, were considered to be not supporting the government in power. Countries where an insufficient number of people identified with any party in government have been excluded from the analysis. Below is a table that outlines the governing political parties in each country. 1 Governing parties were not updated to account for elections that occurred after the survey was fielded and resulted in a new party (or parties) serving in government. Language used to measure party
  • STATUTES of the EUROPEAN GREEN PARTY European Political Party (PPEU)

    STATUTES of the EUROPEAN GREEN PARTY European Political Party (PPEU)

    STATUTES of the EUROPEAN GREEN PARTY European Political Party (PPEU) adopted at the EGP Council, 12.11.2011, Paris amended at the EGP Council, 20-22 May 2016, Utrecht amended at the EGP Council, 2-4 December 2016, Glasgow amended at the EGP Council, 31 March 2017, Liverpool amended at the EGP Council, 26 November 2017, Karlstad Preamble The European Green Party represents Green Parties from all over Europe, and we are part of the Global Green family. We stand proudly for sustainable development and respect of human rights, built on the values of environmental responsibility, equality, freedom, justice, diversity and peace. Greens face the challenges of the 21st century by seeking to shape society in an innovative way. We propose policies for social solidarity and coherence compatible with sound economic and financial governance and which guarantee sustainability within our changing societies. For us and for generations to come. These Statutes replace and supersede the previous Statutes of the European Green Party published in the Moniteur Belge on 19/09/2013. ARTICLE 1 Definitions 1.1 “Full Members” means those members specified in Article 4.3.1. 1.2 “Members” means the entire membership of the European Green Party as specified in Article 4. 1.3 “Allocated Votes” means the total number of votes assigned at each Council meeting to Full Members, determined according to their size and other criteria under a formula detailed in the Rule Book, and to the Green Group in the European Parliament and the Federation of Young European Greens as specified in Article 5.3 and further detailed in the Rule Book.
  • Peoples' Democratic Party

    Peoples' Democratic Party

    Country Policy and Information Note Turkey: Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) Version 4.0 March 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules • The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.