BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT BAMYAN SUMMARY RESULTS ROUND 10 ▪ JAN – JUN 2020 This community in Bamyan has constructed a greenhouse using locally available materials. © IOM 2020 ABOUT DTM The Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) is a system that tracks HIGHLIGHTS and monitors displacement and population mobility. It is designed districts assessed to regularly and systematically capture, process and disseminate 7 information to provide a better understanding of the movements 184 settlements assessed and evolving needs of displaced populations, whether on site or en route. For more information about DTM in Afghanistan, please 1,159 visit www.displacement.iom.int/afghanistan. key informants interviewed In Afghanistan, DTM employs the Baseline Mobility Assessment 48,327 tool, designed to track mobility, determine the population sizes and returnees from abroad [2012-2020] locations of forcibly displaced people, reasons for displacement, places of origin, displacement locations and times of displacement, 52,140 including basic demographics, as well as vulnerabilities and priority IDPs [2012–2020] currently in host communities needs. Data is collected at the settlement level, through key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and direct observations. 81,179 former IDPs have returned to their homes [2012–2020] DTM enables IOM and its partners to deliver evidence-based, better targeted, mobility-sensitive and sustainable humanitarian 45,337 assistance, reintegration, community stabilization and development out-migrants fled abroad [2012–2020] programming. 5,713 out-migrants fled to Europe (13%) 5 TARGET POPULATIONS 84 Through the Baseline Mobility Assessments, DTM tracks the returnees and IDPs live in tents or in the open air locations, population sizes, and cross-sectoral needs of five core target population categories: 2 in 5 42% of all returnees and IDPs reside in Bamyan 1. Returnees from Abroad district Afghans who had fled abroad for at least 6 months and have now returned to Afghanistan 1 in 4 2. Out-Migrants 25% in Kahmard and 21% in Bamyan district are Afghans who moved or fled abroad IDPs Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), subdivided into the following three categories: 1 in 2 54% of former IDPs from Sayghan, 42% from 3. Fled IDPs Kahmard and 28% from Bamyan district, have Afghans from an assessed village who fled as IDPs to reside elsewhere in Afghanistan returned home 4. Arrival IDPs 3 in 5 IDPs from other locations currently residing in an assessed village persons in Kahmard and Sayghan districts and more 5. Returned IDPs than 20% in Yakawlang, Bamyan and Panjab have Afghans from an assessed village who had fled as IDPs in the past fled their homes as IDPs and have now returned home Data on population sizes for the 5 target population categories is collected by time of displacement, using each of the following time frames: 2012-2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018. • 2019 • 2020
For more information, please contact: [email protected] www.displacement.iom.int/afghanistan BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 2 Displaced Individuals in all 5 Target Populations | Summary Overview by District Total Inflow *Base (Returnees + % of % of % of Arrival % of Returned % of Out % of District Population Arrival IDPs) Pop. Returnees Pop. Fled IDPs Pop. IDPs Pop. IDPs Pop. Migrants Pop. Bamyan 91,428 42,612 32% 13,921 10% 25,406 28% 28,691 21% 25,998 28% 8,774 10% Shibar 32,207 1,867 5% 1,439 4% 5,710 18% 428 1% 3,637 11% 2,662 8% Sayghan 26,176 9,086 26% 7,477 21% 15,641 60% 1,609 5% 14,126 54% 7,328 28% Kahmard 39,648 23,895 38% 7,707 12% 24,730 62% 16,188 25% 16,510 42% 8,854 22% Yakawlang 95,467 8,541 8% 7,197 7% 20,720 22% 1,344 1% 8,130 9% 5,898 6% Panjab 74,423 8,962 11% 5,903 7% 15,981 21% 3,059 4% 7,113 10% 5,539 7% Waras 119,075 5,504 4% 4,683 4% 11,727 10% 821 1% 5,665 5% 6,282 5% Total 478,424 100,467 17% 48,327 8% 119,915 25% 52,140 9% 81,179 17% 45,337 9%
* Base Population source: NSIA Population Estimates for 1397 (2018 to 2019) Symbology:target population ≥ 200,000 % of base population ≥ 25%
According to DTM’s Community-Based Needs Assessment (CBNA) report from June 2020, 80% of all settlements in Bamyan do not have access to health facilities within their area, leading the majority of people (74%) to travel to access medical services. © IOM 2020 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 3 METHODOLOGY KEY INFORMANTS The overall objective of DTM's Baseline Mobility Assessment DTM’s field enumerators collect data at the settlement level, in Afghanistan is to track mobility and displacement, provide predominantly through focus group discussions with key population estimates, locations and geographic distribution of informants. While assessing communities, enumerators also displaced, return and migrant populations, as well as refugees, observe the living conditions and availability of multi-sectoral nomads, cross-border tribal groups, and both domestic and services. In the rare case that DTM’s District Focal Points cannot international labour migrants. DTM captures additional mobility physically reach a community, due to insecurity, conflict, or risk of information, including reasons for displacement and return, retaliation, DFPs meet the focus groups at safe locations outside places of origin and destination, times of displacement and their communities or conduct the assessments by phone. return, secondary displacements, and population demographics, vulnerabilities and multi-sectoral needs. By actively recruiting more female enumerators, though challenging, DTM has made significant strides to improve DTM predominantly employs enumerators who originate from gender inclusion in focus group discussions, although there is the areas of assessment. Enumerators collect quantitative data much room for improvement. While women only represent 9% at the settlement level, through focus group discussions with key of the key informants in Bamyan, this is an improvement from informants (KIs). Through direct observations, enumerators also the national average of 0.1% female representation in DTM 's collect qualitative data on living conditions, basic services, and first round, completed in March 2017. security and socio-economic situation. Due to security risks, enumerators cannot carry smart-phones 1,159 149 or tablets in the field, therefore they collect data, daily, using key informants (KIs) key informants are IDPs a paper-based form, which is pre-filled with data from the interviewed or returnees (13%) previous round for verification of existing data and to expedite 107 570 the assessment process. Completed forms are submitted weekly female key informants KIs from host to the provincial DTM office and verified for accuracy bythe (9%) communities (49%) team leader and data entry clerk. Once verified, the data is entered electronically via mobile devices, using KoBo forms, and 1,052 127 submitted directly into DTM's central SQL server in Kabul, where male key informants KIs from multi-sectoral it is systematically cleaned and verified daily, through automated (91%) and social services (11%) and manual systems. This stringent review process ensures that DTM data is of the highest quality, accuracy and integrity. 6.3 282 average number of KIs KIs from local When DTM assesses a province for the first time, enumerators per focus group authorities (24%) collect data through two rounds of two-layered assessments: 1. District-level assessment (B1): this assessment aims to identify settlements with high inflows and outflows of Key Informants by Type | Bamyan Afghan nationals and provide estimated numbers of each target population category. 0% 2. Settlement-level assessment (B2): based on the results of B1, 1%3% 5% this assessment collects information on inflows and outflows 1% 0% of each target population category at each settlement 4% (village), identified through B1. Additional villages are also identified and assessed, based on referrals from KIs. 13%
Since DTM has now assessed all 34 provinces, only settlement- 49% level assessments will be conducted in the future. Pending continued funding, DTM aims to conduct baseline mobility assessments, nationwide, twice per year.
24% Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, DTM enumerators have been striving to conduct FGDs outdoors, in addition to disseminating COVID-19 RCCE information materials to community leaders. © IOM 2020
Community/Tribal Representative Community Development Council (CDC) Representative Displaced Groups Representative Education Representative Health Sector Representative Humanitarian/Social Organization Other District Authority Representative Small/Medium Enterprise Representative Agriculture Representative Other BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 4 RETURNEES Returnees are Afghan nationals who have returned to Returnees from Abroad | Country/Region of Origin | Bamyan Afghanistan in the assessed location after having spent at least 50,000 91% 43,854 six months abroad. This group includes both documented 45,000 returnees (Afghans who were registered refugees in host 40,000 countries and then requested voluntary return with UNHCR and 35,000 relevant national authorities) and undocumented returnees 30,000 25,000 (Afghans who did not request voluntary return with UNHCR, but 20,000 Individuals rather returned spontaneously from host countries, irrespective 15,000 7% 10,000 2% of whether or not they were registered refugees with UNHCR 3,259 0.2% 0.08% 0% and relevant national authorities). 5,000 1,070 91 38 15 0 Pakistan Iran Europe Middle East Rest of Asia Other including 48,327 3,259 Turkey returnees from returned from abroad Pakistan (7%) 42,456 43,854 Returnees from Abroad | Annual Trends | Bamyan undocumented returned from Iran 25,000 23,637 returnees from (91%) Pakistan + Iran (88%) 20,000 4,657 1,214 15,000 documented returnees from 10,000 Individuals 6,420 returnees from non-neighbouring 5,701 5,359 Pakistan + Iran (10%) countries (3%) 5,000 3,791 3,419
0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Returnees from Abroad by District | Bamyan Returnees from Europe & Turkey | Annual Trends | Bamyan Bamyan 13,921 300 255 250 Kahmard 7,707 197 188 200 160 170 150 Sayghan 7,477 100 Individuals 100
50 Yakawlang 7,197 0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Panjab 5,903
Waras 4,683 Returnees from Pakistan | Annual Trends | Bamyan 2,500 2,323 Shibar 1,439 2,000
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 1,500 Individuals 1,000 Individuals 500 315 255 2012-15 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 146 122 98 0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Undocumented Documented
Returnees from Iran | Annual Trends | Bamyan 25,000 21,154 20,000
15,000
10,000
Individuals 5,908 5,414 4,861 5,000 3,475 3,042
0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Undocumented Documented BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 5 ARRIVAL IDPs Arrival IDPs (IDPs) are Afghans who fled from other settlements Arrival IDPs | Annual Trends | Bamyan in Afghanistan and have arrived and presently reside at the 18,995 assessed location / host community, as a result of, or in order to 20,000 avoid, the effects of armed conflict, generalized violence, human 18,000 16,000 rights violations, protection concerns, or natural and human- 14,000 made disasters. 12,000 10,000 8,643
Individuals 8,000 6,843 52,140 33% 6,431 6,037 IDPs currently reside displaced due to 6,000 5,191 in host communities conflict 4,000 2,000 28,691 67% 0 IDPs in Bamyan district, displaced due to 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 which hosts the most natural disaster IDPs (55%)
2,450 70% Arrival IDPs by Province of Origin | Bamyan IDPs reside in informal displaced within their settlements (5%) home province
15,898 30% Arrival IDPs by District | Bamyan 36,242 70% Bamyan 28,691
Kahmard 16,188 Same Province Other Provices
Panjab 3,059
Sayghan 1,609 Arrival IDPs in Informal Settlements by District | Bamyan 2,500 2,100 Yakawlang 1,344 2,000
Waras 821 1,500
Individuals 1,000 Shibar 428
500 350 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 Individuals 0 Bamyan Kahmard 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Arrival IDPs | Shelter | Bamyan
0% 0.2% 27% Own House Rented House 50% Host Family Tent Open Air
23% BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 6
+ TOTAL INFLOW [RETURNEES + ARRIVAL IDPs]
Total Inflow (Returnees + IDPs) | Bamyan Overall, Bamyan province hosts a total inflow of 100,467 returnees and IDPs, of which 48% (48,327) are returnees Bamyan 42,612 and 52% (52,140) are IDPs. The table below shows the 40 settlements in Bamyan that are most affected by this influx. These 40 settlements (22% of the 184 settlements assessed Kahmard 23,895 in Bamyan) host 73% of the province’s returnees and IDPs. These communities are especially fragile and susceptible Sayghan 9,086 to social instability induced by this large influx and the subsequent competition for limited, already overstretched Panjab 8,962 resources and job opportunities.
Yakawlang 8,541 Top 40 settlements hosting the most Returnees + IDPs Rank Settlement District Individuals
Waras 5,504 1 Do Ab Yakh Zaren Kahmard 6,279 2 Dare Azhdar Bamyan 5,805
Shibar 1,867 3 Gharow Sayghan 5,335 4 Jagra Khail Bamyan 4,896 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 5 Shin Tapa Bamyan 4,333 Returnees from Abroad Arrival IDPs 6 Dasht Safid Kahmard 4,273 7 Petab Laghman Bamyan 3,267 8 Zargaranha Bamyan 2,934 Total Inflow (Returnees + IDPs) | Summary by District 9 Surkh Qulaha Bamyan 2,873 District Returnees Arrival IDPs Total Inflow 10 Ashposhta Kahmard 2,646 Bamyan 13,921 28,691 42,612 11 Andaw (Andab) (1) Kahmard 2,461 Kahmard 7,707 16,188 23,895 12 Dasht-i-eissa Khan Bamyan 1,909 Sayghan 7,477 1,609 9,086 13 Regshad Ha Bamyan 1,751 Panjab 5,903 3,059 8,962 14 Dowro Hulya Kahmard 1,600 Yakawlang 7,197 1,344 8,541 15 Mola Ghulam Bamyan 1,587 Waras 4,683 821 5,504 16 Dashti Ghujur Panjab 1,529 Shibar 1,439 428 1,867 17 Dasht Shairi Bamyan 1,254 Grand Total 48,327 52,140 100,467 18 Do Shakh Kahmard 1,219 19 Sangchaspan Bamyan 1,143 20 Dar Band Kahmard 1,099 21 Hanbar Sumuch Bamyan 1,037 22 Lowranj Kahmard 1,016 23 Haft Gadi Waras 1,006 24 Haidar Abad Bamyan 994 25 Tayboti Bamyan 894 26 Tolwara Bamyan 836 27 Qarghan Sayghan 802 28 Fat Masti Bamyan 797 29 Chakari Darah Kahmard 795 30 Char Tak Kahmard 776 31 Ladowi Bala Bamyan 647 32 Qarwana Sayghan 632 33 Ghar Ghara Panjab 618 34 Zerk Panjab 609 35 Toopche Bamyan 598 36 Aqar Bat Bamyan 595 37 Dahan Nargis Panjab 590 38 Qala Now (1) Yakawlang 581 39 Na Yak Yakawlang 570 40 Khawal Bamyan 539 Total 73,125 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 7
Total In-Flow (Returnees + IDPs) Total In-Flow (Returnees + IDPs) Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 ,00 ,0 00 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. IDP rn 5, 5,0 0,0 ,00 ,0 < 10 50 1, 2,5 5,0 No - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 10 Total Inflow (Returnees+IDPs) | June 2020 etu 1 1 - > https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 8 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Province of Interest Countries Province District Not Accessible Province: Bamyan 1:801,000 0 15 30 60
Ruy-e-Duab SAMANGAN Dara-e-Suf-e-Bala
Doshi
Balkhab Kahmard BAGHLAN SAR-E-PUL Kohestanat Tala Wa Barfak
Sayghan
Ghorband
Feroz Koh Yakawlang Shekh Ali Shibar
PARWAN Bamyan BAMYAN Surkh-e-Parsa
Dawlatyar GHOR
Lal Wa Sarjangal Maydan Shahr Hesa-e-Awal-e-Behsud Jalrez
Panjab Markaz-e-Behsud Nerkh WARDAK
Sang-e-Takht Daymirdad
Chak-e-Wardak Ashtarlay Waras
DAYKUNDI
Nawur GHAZNI Khadir Saydabad Miramor Jaghatu Nili Shahrestan Kharwar Total Inflow (Returnees + Arrival IDPs) by districtZanakhan
Returnees From Abroad per District Returnees From Abroad per Settlement Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | IDP ,00 ,0 00 ,00 ,0 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. rn 5, 5,0 0,0 2,5 5,0 < 10 50 1, 10 No etu - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 1 1 - > Returnees from Abroad | June 2020 https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 8 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Countries Province Province of Interest District Not Accessible Province: Bamyan 1:801,000 0 15 30 60
Ruy-e-Duab SAMANGAN Dara-e-Suf-e-Bala
Doshi
Balkhab Kahmard BAGHLAN SAR-E-PUL Kohestanat Tala Wa Barfak
Sayghan
Ghorband
Feroz Koh Yakawlang Shekh Ali Shibar
PARWAN Bamyan BAMYAN Surkh-e-Parsa
Dawlatyar GHOR
Lal Wa Sarjangal Maydan Shahr Hesa-e-Awal-e-Behsud Jalrez
Panjab Markaz-e-Behsud Nerkh WARDAK
Sang-e-Takht Daymirdad
Chak-e-Wardak Ashtarlay Waras
DAYKUNDI
Nawur GHAZNI Khadir Saydabad Miramor Jaghatu Nili Shahrestan Kharwar Districts of return of Returnees from AbroadZanakhan BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 8 FLED IDPS Fled IDPs are Afghans who have fled from an assessed location Fled IDPs by District | Bamyan or settlement within which they previously resided and now currently reside in a different settlement in Afghanistan, as a result of, or in order to avoid, the effects of armed conflict, Bamyan 25,406 generalized violence, human rights violations, protection concerns, or natural and human-made disasters. Kahmard 24,730
119,915 23% Yakawlang 20,720 Fled IDPs fled IDPs displaced in Bamyan Panjab 15,981
5% 95% Sayghan 15,641 displaced due to displaced due to conflict natural disaster Waras 11,727
Fled IDPs | Annual Trends | Bamyan Shibar 5,710 50,000 46,010 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 45,000 Indviduals 40,000 35,000 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 30,000 25,000 18,764 17,431 Individuals 20,000 13,364 13,543 15,000 10,803 10,000 5,000 0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Total Fled IDPs per District Total Fled IDPs per Settlement Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | IDP ,00 ,0 00 ,00 ,0 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. rn 5, 5,0 0,0 2,5 5,0 < 10 50 1, 10 No etu - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 1 1 - > Fled IDPs | June 2020 https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 8 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Countries Province Province of Interest District Not Accessible Province: Bamyan 1:801,000 0 15 30 60
Ruy-e-Duab SAMANGAN Dara-e-Suf-e-Bala
Doshi
Balkhab Kahmard BAGHLAN SAR-E-PUL Kohestanat Tala Wa Barfak
Sayghan
Ghorband
Feroz Koh Yakawlang Shekh Ali Shibar
PARWAN Bamyan BAMYAN Surkh-e-Parsa
Dawlatyar GHOR
Lal Wa Sarjangal Maydan Shahr Hesa-e-Awal-e-Behsud Jalrez
Panjab Markaz-e-Behsud Nerkh WARDAK
Sang-e-Takht Daymirdad
Chak-e-Wardak Ashtarlay Waras
DAYKUNDI
Nawur GHAZNI Khadir Saydabad
Miramor Jaghatu Nili Shahrestan Kharwar Districts of origin of Fled ZIDPsanakhan BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 9 RETURNED IDPS Returned IDPs are Afghans who have returned to their home place Returned IDPs by District | Bamyan of origin in the assessed location or settlement from which they had fled as IDPs in the past, as a result of, or in order to avoid, the effects of armed conflict, generalized violence, human rights violations, Bamyan 25,998 protection concerns, or natural and human-made disasters. Kahmard 16,510 81,179 26% Returned IDPs returned from other Sayghan 14,126 locations in Bamyan Yakawlang 8,130 3 in 4 1 in 3
former IDPs returned to of all returned IDPs in Panjab 7,113 only 3 districts: Bamyan, Bamyan returned to Kahmard, and Sayghan Bamyan district (32%) Waras 5,665 (70%)
Shibar 3,637 Returned IDPs | Annual Trends | Bamyan 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 27,364 Individuals 25,000 23,913 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 20,000
15,000 11,060 Individuals 10,000 7,044 7,147 4,651 5,000
0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Total Returned IDPs per District Total Returned IDPs Per Settlement Data Source: IOM, AGCHO, AIMS, CSO, OSM DTM AFGHANISTAN Date map production :10 August 2020 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names & boundaries on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of s 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. ees 00 00 00 00 Baseline Mobility Assessment | District Level | IDP ,00 ,0 00 ,00 ,0 The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. rn 5, 5,0 0,0 2,5 5,0 < 10 50 1, 10 No etu - - 2 - 5 > < - - 10 1 1 - > Returned IDPs | June 2020 https://afghanistan.iom.int/ - email : [email protected] 01 01 01 1 cm = 8 km or R 00 00 01 5,0 1,0 2,5 Kilometers 10, 25, 5,0 Countries Province Province of Interest District Not Accessible Province: Bamyan 1:801,000 0 15 30 60
Ruy-e-Duab SAMANGAN Dara-e-Suf-e-Bala
Doshi
Balkhab Kahmard BAGHLAN SAR-E-PUL Kohestanat Tala Wa Barfak
Sayghan
Ghorband
Feroz Koh Yakawlang Shekh Ali Shibar
PARWAN Bamyan BAMYAN Surkh-e-Parsa
Dawlatyar GHOR
Lal Wa Sarjangal Maydan Shahr Hesa-e-Awal-e-Behsud Jalrez
Panjab Markaz-e-Behsud Nerkh WARDAK
Sang-e-Takht Daymirdad
Chak-e-Wardak Ashtarlay Waras
DAYKUNDI
Nawur GHAZNI Khadir Saydabad
Miramor Jaghatu Nili Shahrestan Kharwar Districts of return of Returned ZIDPsanakhan BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 10 OUT-MIGRANTS Out-Migrants are Afghans who have moved or fled abroad from the assessed location, whatever the cause, reason or duration Out-Migrants | Annual Trends | Bamyan 25,000 of expatriation. This category includes refugees, displaced and 22,097 uprooted people, and economic migrants who have left Afghanistan. 20,000 45,337 5,713 fled abroad fled to Europe (13%) 15,000
37,271 1,666 Individuals 10,000 fled to Iran (82%) fled to Pakistan (4%) 6,746 4,242 4,442 4,401 5,000 3,409
0 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Out-Migrants by District | Bamyan
Kahmard 8,854 Out-Migrants to Europe & Turkey | Annual Trends | Bamyan 2,500 Bamyan 8,774 2,057 2,000 Sayghan 7,328 1,500 1,114 Waras 6,282 912
Individuals 1,000 768 649
500 Yakawlang 5,898 213
0 Panjab 5,539 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Shibar 2,662
Out-Migrants to Pakistan | Annual Trends | Bamyan 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Individuals 700 658
600 2012-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 500 445
400
300 Individuals Out-Migrants by Country/Region of Destination | Bamyan 200 200 140 118 40,000 37,271 105 100 35,000 30,000 0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 25,000 20,000
Individuals 15,000
10,000 5,713 5,000 1,666 Out-Migrants to Iran | Annual Trends | Bamyan 56 441 190 0 25,000 Pakistan Iran Europe Middle East Rest of Asia Other including 19,048 Turkey 20,000
15,000
Individuals 10,000
5,074 5,000 3,167 3,561 3,045 3,376
0 2012 – 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 BASELINE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT ▪ SUMMARY RESULTS IOM AFGHANISTAN ▪ BAMYAN ▪ ROUND 10 ▪ JAN — JUN 2020 11
International Organization for Migration 17 Route des Morillons P.O. box 17 1211 Geneva 19 Switzerland
International Organization for Migration House #27 4th Street Ansari Square Shahr-e Naw Kabul, Afghanistan
The data used in this report was collected under a collaborative effort by the IOM Afghanistan Mission and the Global DTM support team. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries.
© 2020 International Organization for Migration (IOM)
Please visit the DTM Afghanistan web page for more information, including downloadable maps and datasets, as well as interactive maps and dashboards: www.displacement.iom.int-afghanistan
CONTACT US For further information, please contact the DTM Team: [email protected] facebook.com-iomafghanistan twitter.com-iomafghanistan instagram.com-iomafghanistan
in coordination with
DTM in Afghanistan is generously supported by:
Co-funded by the European Union
For more information, please contact: [email protected] www.displacement.iom.int/afghanistan