Breeds of the Grassy Downs’

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

BBRREEEEDDSS OOFF TTHHEE GGRRAASSSSYY DDOOWWNNSS By Mick Bassett and the Team of Aviculture Europe Photo Gareth Lloyd Hughes, courtesy of the Southdown Sheep Society of Great Britain. In the South of England - and only there as far as I know - are many 'Dew- Ponds' - natural ponds as a watering place. These are old, hundreds and hundreds of years old, man made on the top sides of the 'sea side' of the grassy 'Downs' - the chain of hills that sub verse Southern England in 3 main ridges right too Wales in the West and Kent in the East. A downland - often referred to as Downs is an area of open chalk hills. (The word 'down' derives from a medieval Germanic or Norse word ‘dun’, a hill). These dewponds have been made as long as sheep have been grazed there, so since late Neolithic/ early Bronze age times. The Dewpond is made shallow and lined with mud and hay etc. trampled in by men and oxen, to give a water repellent lining. The ponds literally fill with dew that comes in from the sea in the morning and from the mist and fog; they usually never dry out. They were often the only water source on the High Downs, so although there is a track along the Downs Top, dating back thousands of years and ancient when the Romans invaded, it was never used by them as no water for the numbers of troops they had. Sheep farming then was very different - indeed the Downs themselves would be almost unrecognisable today. The strange thing, although shrubs and trees will completely take over ground in less than 30 years, the track has ALWAYS remained 'clear' and passable, in some parts as wide as a modern country road! The present closely-grazed turf is the result of continual grazing by sheep. Various set out Walks and Rides give you the opportunity to see more of the fantastic scenery and countryside of the Downs. Try www.nationaltrail.co.uk/ for an over-view of the area. Left: Sheep at a dew pond, 1932. Photo Kirk Lincoln Dickenson. A very popular route is the 160 kilometre long ‘South Downs Way’ following the old routes along the ridges of the South Downs. Both the North and South Downs come together at the Wessex Downs, just inside the Hampshire http://my.opera.com/blackpatch/blog/ border. The eastern end, where it reaches the coast between the towns of Seaford and Eastbourne, produces the spectacular scenery of the Seven Sisters; a series of chalk cliffs that formed where the South Downs meet the sea and are gradually being eroded by the sea. Above: View of the Seven Sisters. Photo courtesy of John Hawkins. Another very interesting route is the 'Ridgeway' track that by passes many old ‘Stonehenges' like Avebury, Stonehenge, West Kennet Long Barrow, Waylands Smithy and one of the most famous, Dragon Hill (or White Horse Hill). In a tiny village on the sides of the Downs near Avebury is King Alfred’s Blowing Stone; a stone with holes in that you are supposed to be able to blow like a trumpet, the means whereby King Alfred (The Great) summoned his Saxon troops, but it didn't work for me! The South Downs have a long history; there are archaeological remains from Neolithic times. Until the middle of the 20th century, sheep-rearing was the main occupation of those living on the Downs. Several poultry breeds originated here, the most famous being the Sussex Hen, in Sussex and the Dorking, in Surrey. It is reported that the ‘Rouen’ duck was brought to the south coast & improved by the British breeders around the early 1800's. So we can say Rouens are certainly 'Southern' breeds. Then of course we have the Orpington Ducks and Chickens, which originated south of London, in Kent, which is a little nearer the North Downs. Campbell ducks (original & Khaki) originated in Uley/Gloucestershire, which is a bit away but on part of the Route between the South/North Downs and Wales, where the Malvern Hills and the Downs almost 'meet'. As for the Fancy Pigeons… 43 breeds are registered as being of British origin, but none of them really originated in The Downs. Most occurred in and around Towns; the Mid-lands, East Anglia and Scotland being hot beds in the early days. The West of England Tumbler would be the nearest to a Downland breed of Pigeons, as they were developed in and around Bristol. The city of Bristol has its own area named ‘Durham Downs’ or just ‘The Downs’. It is in the county of Somerset, this is immediately North of the county of Dorset, in which the South Downs are located. Dorking and Sussex The well-known old English fowls have been noted as a breed for any number of years, and so kept and described, as old books and records prove. The five-toed Kent, Sussex and Surrey fowls - and the ‘fighting Cocks’ - have been attributed to the Roman introduction, which is much likely, as Kent possesses a Roman road throughout. Both Columella and Pliny, Roman writers, described birds of ‘Dorking type’ with five toes. Different from what you might think, in ancient times, poultry in the southern farmyards was not merely one of the neglected appendages of the villa and farm, but was chosen and bred with much care, attention and discretion, and that not only as a source of profit, but also for pleasure and even sport. Before any poultry shows existed there were fanciers, and the table fowls of Kent were noted in history, and these, with those of Sussex and Surrey, were truthfully pronounced by competent judges to be as “table fowls, the very finest and best in the world”. Harrison Weir describes how in May, 1829, when scarcely five years old, he traveled with his mother by coach to Tunbridge Wells. Many of their relatives and friends living in Kent and Sussex were farmers, and here it was that he first saw the Kent and Sussex white-shanked five-toed black-and-red poultry, kept and known at the farms beyond time of remembrance. More than 60 years later he started writing a book - ‘Our Poultry’ published in 1902 – and described the Kent Fowl as follows: “The farmer and the poultry fancier of to-day has but little or no idea of the superior and long-tested quality of the then ancient breeds of fowls nurtured and kept about our southern homesteads, nor how much they were cared for, appreciated and valued. Both the cocks and hens were most carefully and thoughtfully selected, not only for their fineness of flesh, thinness of skin, their form and size, but also for their uniformity and beauty of color; in this respect districts and farms were known as having a certain specialty, and the fowls were not, as many modern writers ignorantly state, unculled or unmatched”. Right: Old Kent Fowl, by H. Weir, 1851. At the first ‘National’ Poultry Show, specifically for live poultry, held in the London Zoological Society’s grounds at Regent’s Park in 1845, the classification included Old Sussex or Kent fowls, Surrey fowls and Dorkings. Up to about 1850 they were the "best all-round fowls” ever known. Then with the importations of the Shanghai, the Cochin, the Brahma, there arose a craze for size; and as a consequence these coarse breeds were crossed and intercrossed with the old English breeds; the result being those pure breeds — the outcome of centuries of cultured selection and attention, the perfected strains of ‘their forefathers’ in past ages — were mongrelized, in some cases almost past recognition. From 1900 the Dorking was gradually winning its way again into the position as the best of all fowls for table purposes. This had to be done by a reversion to the old southern breeders' tactics of choosing the best-breasted, closest-feathered, pure white-shanked, having white feet and toe-nails, with white ear-lobes, or that of infusing the blood and purest breed of the old English white-shanked Game-cock. The old southern fowls, again were close-feathered, hearty and good feeders and foragers; a breed of super-excellence, of large size, fleshy, well feathered, full tailed, and particularly handsome. The Dorking was standardized in Great Britain in 1865, the clear white fleshy shanks and the white ear-lobe being distinctive, unmistakable indications of the pure breed. At present time, Dorkings have red earlobes. Left: Prize Dorking cockerel by H. Weir, 1895. Below: Dorking cockerel, 2009, with red earlobes. Being a European/old English fowl, it should have white ear-lobes and it is a pity this characteristic was neglec- ted during time. Photo Luuk Hans. Above: Dorking hen, in ‘Our Poultry’ published in 1902. The Sussex was not yet described as a ‘breed’ in the first ‘Book of Standards’ of 1865. In those days the classification “Sussex” included birds with various characteristics of shape and colour. A Standard for the Breed was drafted in 1903 and the Sussex was officially recognised as a 4-toed breed in the colours Speckled, Light and Red, later followed by Brown, Buff, White and Silver. In the 1940s another colour of Sussex was created, known as Coronation, (same pattern as Light Sussex but with blue instead of black markings) however after a couple of years of standardisation it became extinct. It has been re- created again and was re- standardised in 2002. Right: Sussex Barn-Door Fowl. Note the 4 toes. Drawing by H. Weir, 1851. Above: Pair of speckled Sussex.
Recommended publications
  • "First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"

    "First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"

    Country Report of Australia for the FAO First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1 ASSESSING THE STATE OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY THE FARM ANIMAL SECTOR IN AUSTRALIA.................................................................................7 1.1 OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND RELATED ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. ......................................................................................................7 Australian Agriculture - general context .....................................................................................7 Australia's agricultural sector: production systems, diversity and outputs.................................8 Australian livestock production ...................................................................................................9 1.2 ASSESSING THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF FARM ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY..............10 Major agricultural species in Australia.....................................................................................10 Conservation status of important agricultural species in Australia..........................................11 Characterisation and information systems ................................................................................12 1.3 ASSESSING THE STATE OF UTILISATION OF FARM ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN AUSTRALIA. ........................................................................................................................................................12
  • A Survey of Relationships Among Rare Breeds Of

    A Survey of Relationships Among Rare Breeds Of

    A SURVEY OF RELATIONSHIPS AMONG RARE BREEDS OF SWINE _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science _____________________________________________________ by KIZZI ROBERTS Dr. William Lamberson, Thesis Supervisor December 2014 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled A SURVEY OF RELATIONSHIPS AMONG RARE BREEDS OF SWINE presented by Kizzi Roberts, a candidate for the degree of master of science and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor William Lamberson Professor Timothy Safranski Professor Matthew Gompper Thanks Mom and Dad. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge and thank my advisor Dr. Bill Lamberson for all of his help and support over the years as I worked toward completing my degree. I could not have asked for a better mentor and professor. A big thank you to my committee members Dr. Tim Safranski and Dr. Matthew Gompper for their support and patience as I worked toward finishing my thesis. I appreciate their willingness to work with me and their contributions toward helping me complete this process. I would also like to thank Tasia Taxis, my fellow graduate student, for all of her support and guidance during this process. Thank you to Cinda Hudlow for being an outstanding resource for all things related to graduate
  • Final Report APL Project 2017/2217

    Final Report APL Project 2017/2217

    Review of the scientific literature and the international pig welfare codes and standards to underpin the future Standards and Guidelines for Pigs Final Report APL Project 2017/2217 August 2018 Animal Welfare Science Centre, University of Melbourne Dr Lauren Hemsworth Prof Paul Hemsworth Ms Rutu Acharya Mr Jeremy Skuse 21 Bedford St North Melbourne, VIC 3051 1 Disclaimer: APL shall not be responsible in any manner whatsoever to any person who relies, in whole or in part, on the contents of this report unless authorised in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of APL. Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 1. Animal welfare and its assessment ...................................................................................... 12 2. Purpose of this Review and the Australian Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals – Pigs .......................................................................................................................... 19 3. Housing and management of pigs ....................................................................................... 22 3.1 Gestating sows (including gilts) ......................................................................................... 23 3.2 Farrowing/lactating sow and piglets, including painful husbandry practices ................... 35 3.3 Weaner and growing-finishing pigs ..................................................................................
  • Farming and Biodiversity of Pigs in Bhutan

    Farming and Biodiversity of Pigs in Bhutan

    Animal Genetic Resources, 2011, 48, 47–61. © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011 doi:10.1017/S2078633610001256 Farming and biodiversity of pigs in Bhutan K. Nidup1,2, D. Tshering3, S. Wangdi4, C. Gyeltshen5, T. Phuntsho5 and C. Moran1 1Centre for Advanced Technologies in Animal Genetics and Reproduction (REPROGEN), Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Australia; 2College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan, Lobesa, Bhutan; 3Department of Livestock, National Pig Breeding Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Thimphu, Bhutan; 4Department of Livestock, Regional Pig and Poultry Breeding Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Lingmithang, Bhutan; 5Department of Livestock, Regional Pig and Poultry Breeding Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Gelephu, Bhutan Summary Pigs have socio-economic and cultural importance to the livelihood of many Bhutanese rural communities. While there is evidence of increased religious disapproval of pig raising, the consumption of pork, which is mainly met from imports, is increasing every year. Pig development activities are mainly focused on introduction of exotic germplasm. There is an evidence of a slow but steady increase in the population of improved pigs in the country. On the other hand, indigenous pigs still comprise 68 percent of the total pig population but their numbers are rapidly declining. If this trend continues, indigenous pigs will become extinct within the next 10 years. Once lost, this important genetic resource is largely irreplaceable. Therefore, Government of Bhutan must make an effort to protect, promote and utilize indigenous pig resources in a sustainable manner. In addition to the current ex situ conservation programme based on cryopre- servation of semen, which needs strengthening, in situ conservation and a nucleus farm is required to combat the enormous decline of the population of indigenous pigs and to ensure a sustainable source of swine genetic resources in the country.
  • Gwartheg Prydeinig Prin (Ba R) Cattle - Gwartheg

    Gwartheg Prydeinig Prin (Ba R) Cattle - Gwartheg

    GWARTHEG PRYDEINIG PRIN (BA R) CATTLE - GWARTHEG Aberdeen Angus (Original Population) – Aberdeen Angus (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Belted Galloway – Belted Galloway British White – Gwyn Prydeinig Chillingham – Chillingham Dairy Shorthorn (Original Population) – Byrgorn Godro (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol). Galloway (including Black, Red and Dun) – Galloway (gan gynnwys Du, Coch a Llwyd) Gloucester – Gloucester Guernsey - Guernsey Hereford Traditional (Original Population) – Henffordd Traddodiadol (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Highland - Yr Ucheldir Irish Moiled – Moel Iwerddon Lincoln Red – Lincoln Red Lincoln Red (Original Population) – Lincoln Red (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Northern Dairy Shorthorn – Byrgorn Godro Gogledd Lloegr Red Poll – Red Poll Shetland - Shetland Vaynol –Vaynol White Galloway – Galloway Gwyn White Park – Gwartheg Parc Gwyn Whitebred Shorthorn – Byrgorn Gwyn Version 2, February 2020 SHEEP - DEFAID Balwen - Balwen Border Leicester – Border Leicester Boreray - Boreray Cambridge - Cambridge Castlemilk Moorit – Castlemilk Moorit Clun Forest - Fforest Clun Cotswold - Cotswold Derbyshire Gritstone – Derbyshire Gritstone Devon & Cornwall Longwool – Devon & Cornwall Longwool Devon Closewool - Devon Closewool Dorset Down - Dorset Down Dorset Horn - Dorset Horn Greyface Dartmoor - Greyface Dartmoor Hill Radnor – Bryniau Maesyfed Leicester Longwool - Leicester Longwool Lincoln Longwool - Lincoln Longwool Llanwenog - Llanwenog Lonk - Lonk Manx Loaghtan – Loaghtan Ynys Manaw Norfolk Horn - Norfolk Horn North Ronaldsay / Orkney - North Ronaldsay / Orkney Oxford Down - Oxford Down Portland - Portland Shropshire - Shropshire Soay - Soay Version 2, February 2020 Teeswater - Teeswater Wensleydale – Wensleydale White Face Dartmoor – White Face Dartmoor Whitefaced Woodland - Whitefaced Woodland Yn ogystal, mae’r bridiau defaid canlynol yn cael eu hystyried fel rhai wedi’u hynysu’n ddaearyddol. Nid ydynt wedi’u cynnwys yn y rhestr o fridiau prin ond byddwn yn eu hychwanegu os bydd nifer y mamogiaid magu’n cwympo o dan y trothwy.
  • First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"

    First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"

    "First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources" (SoWAnGR) Country Report of the United Kingdom to the FAO Prepared by the National Consultative Committee appointed by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Contents: Executive Summary List of NCC Members 1 Assessing the state of agricultural biodiversity in the farm animal sector in the UK 1.1. Overview of UK agriculture. 1.2. Assessing the state of conservation of farm animal biological diversity. 1.3. Assessing the state of utilisation of farm animal genetic resources. 1.4. Identifying the major features and critical areas of AnGR conservation and utilisation. 1.5. Assessment of Animal Genetic Resources in the UK’s Overseas Territories 2. Analysing the changing demands on national livestock production & their implications for future national policies, strategies & programmes related to AnGR. 2.1. Reviewing past policies, strategies, programmes and management practices (as related to AnGR). 2.2. Analysing future demands and trends. 2.3. Discussion of alternative strategies in the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 2.4. Outlining future national policy, strategy and management plans for the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 3. Reviewing the state of national capacities & assessing future capacity building requirements. 3.1. Assessment of national capacities 4. Identifying national priorities for the conservation and utilisation of AnGR. 4.1. National cross-cutting priorities 4.2. National priorities among animal species, breeds,
  • Poultry, Pigeon & Eggs

    Poultry, Pigeon & Eggs

    POULTRY, PIGEON & EGGS Competition Schedule 30 August - 8 September 2019 | theshow.com.au 2019 POULTRY, PIGEONS AND EGGS IMPORTANT INFORMATION ARRIVAL/DELIVERY, JUDGING AND DEPARTURE TIMES Poultry and Pigeons ARRIVAL - Exhibits must be penned between 10.00 am and 9.00 pm on Thursday 29 August. Exhibitors delivering exhibits may enter and exit via the Leader Street entrance. The Poultry & Pigeon Pavilion is situated on the first floor of the Stirling/Angas Hall, west of the Hamilton Boulevard and you will be required to bring your vehicle via the western ramp entry. The exhibits must be accompanied by computer printout entry details. No exhibits will be permitted inside the pavilion other than those which have been entered for competition. JUDGING - will commence at 8.00 am on Friday 30 August. The Society reserves the right to re-allocate breeds to judges after closing date depending on entry numbers. DEPARTURE - Between 6.00 pm and 10.00 pm Sunday 8 September (boxing from 5.00 pm) or Between 6.00 am and 10.30 am Monday 9 September When collecting exhibits, you must produce your Entry Details Return (computer pen number print out) and be accompanied by an official who will assist in checking out each exhibit. Sunday 8 September Departure Birds may be boxed from 5.00 pm. Departure on foot - Exhibitors will be permitted to leave on foot with their birds between 6pm and 8:30pm only. Vehicle collection – Exhibitors with many birds may bring a single vehicle onsite via the Leader Street gate to assist with collection between 8:30pm and 10pm only.
  • Northern Thames Basin Area Profile: Supporting Documents

    Northern Thames Basin Area Profile: Supporting Documents

    National Character 111: Northern Thames Basin Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 111: Northern Thames Basin Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper1, Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention3, we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future. 1 The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature, Defra NCA profiles are working documents which draw on current evidence and (2011; URL: www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm80/8082/8082.pdf) 2 knowledge.
  • Aberdeen & Northern Marts SPECIAL SALE of RARE & MINORITY

    Aberdeen & Northern Marts SPECIAL SALE of RARE & MINORITY

    Aberdeen & Northern Marts A member of ANM GROUP LTD. THAINSTONE CENTRE, INVERURIE TELEPHONE : 01467 623710 SPECIAL SALE OF RARE & MINORITY BREEDS OF POULTRY & EGGS INCLUDING ◼ TURKEYS ◼ GUINEA FOWL ◼ LARGE FOWL ◼ PIGEONS ◼ BANTAMS ◼ GEESE ◼ PHEASANTS ◼ DUCKS ◼ PEAFOWL ◼ EGGS ◼ QUAIL ◼ POULTRY EQUIPMENT within THAINSTONE CENTRE, INVERURIE on SATURDAY 7th MARCH 2020 from 10.00 am PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS PLEASE REGISTER AT THE MAIN OFFICE AND OBTAIN A BUYERS NUMBER Please note that a Buyers Premium of 10% + VAT with a maximum of £50.00 per lot will be added to the sale price of Poultry, Eggs and Poultry Equipment. PRICE £2.00 2 ALL POULTRY ENTRIES MUST BE PENNED BY 9.30 am ANY PEN OF POULTRY FAILING TO ATTRACT AN OPENING BID OF £5 WILL BE PASSED OVER UNSOLD NO POULTRY TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT A PASS OR IN THE ABSENCE OF AN ATTENDANT PURCHASERS MUST INSPECT STOCK PRIOR TO BIDDING TO SATISFY THEMSELVES THAT THE LOT CONFORMS TO THE DESCRIPTION IN THE CATALOGUE. SALES ARRANGEMENTS 10.00am Exchange Turkeys and Large Fowl, Bantams, Pheasants, Peafowl, Quail, Guinea Fowl, Ducks and Geese. All entries must be in place by 9.30am 11.30am Concourse Hatching Eggs—Please note that all egg entries must be in place by 9.30am followed by Yard Poultry Equipment (Subject to Arrival) 3 PURCHASERS MUST INSPECT STOCK PRIOR TO BIDDING TO SATISFY THEMSELVES THAT THE LOT CONFORMS TO THE DESCRIPTION IN THE CATALOGUE. TURKEYS Charles Barron Blairindinnie Gartly Huntly 1 Broad Breast Bronze Hen - 2019 Hatch One 2 Broad Breast Bronze Hen - 2019 Hatch One Mrs M Leggate
  • Buyer Beware! Make Sure You See the Parent’S Papers Or Confirm One of the Most Striking and Common Tell-Tale with the Breed Registrar Before Buying

    Buyer Beware! Make Sure You See the Parent’S Papers Or Confirm One of the Most Striking and Common Tell-Tale with the Breed Registrar Before Buying

    larger carcasses in a shorter period of time. The parent stock was never registered. This can be downside to this is these pigs are then sold at high very frustrating for the beginner pig producer who prices to unsuspecting buyers as purebred pigs. wants to do right by their chosen breed. Always BUYER BEWARE! make sure you see the parent’s papers or confirm One of the most striking and common tell-tale with the breed registrar before buying. But why Alison Martin and Jeannette Beranger offer advice signs of crossbreeding is when Pietrain genetics does this really matter? are crossed into a breed. This is particularly prob- on making the right choices when buying heritage lematic with Tamworth, Berkshire and Hereford • Conserving rare breeds: All of us who raise or traditional breed hogs hog populations today. The Pietrain pig is distinct- rare breeds and work to conserve them do ive with its long body and “double muscled” legs. so because of the unique characteristics of When crossed into a heritage breed, the cross will that breed. Each has just the right adaptation, Mangalitsa produce fast growing pigs with that long lean body personality, performance or appearance that The popularity of heritage (or traditional) breed animal is breeding quality; and third, make sure supported by heavily muscled legs. As early as makes it a breed. Conserving these character- hogs has skyrocketed in recent years, largely due to your investment in breeding stock is registered. one month of age these piglets will already begin istics means mating only within the breed; too numerous chefs discovering the fabulous flavor of to show heavy muscling.
  • CATAIR Appendix

    CATAIR Appendix

    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA February 12, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
  • Complaint Report

    Complaint Report

    EXHIBIT A ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK & POULTRY COMMISSION #1 NATURAL RESOURCES DR. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 501-907-2400 Complaint Report Type of Complaint Received By Date Assigned To COMPLAINANT PREMISES VISITED/SUSPECTED VIOLATOR Name Name Address Address City City Phone Phone Inspector/Investigator's Findings: Signed Date Return to Heath Harris, Field Supervisor DP-7/DP-46 SPECIAL MATERIALS & MARKETPLACE SAMPLE REPORT ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD Pesticide Division #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Insp. # Case # Lab # DATE: Sampled: Received: Reported: Sampled At Address GPS Coordinates: N W This block to be used for Marketplace Samples only Manufacturer Address City/State/Zip Brand Name: EPA Reg. #: EPA Est. #: Lot #: Container Type: # on Hand Wt./Size #Sampled Circle appropriate description: [Non-Slurry Liquid] [Slurry Liquid] [Dust] [Granular] [Other] Other Sample Soil Vegetation (describe) Description: (Place check in Water Clothing (describe) appropriate square) Use Dilution Other (describe) Formulation Dilution Rate as mixed Analysis Requested: (Use common pesticide name) Guarantee in Tank (if use dilution) Chain of Custody Date Received by (Received for Lab) Inspector Name Inspector (Print) Signature Check box if Dealer desires copy of completed analysis 9 ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY COMMISSION #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 (501) 225-1598 REPORT ON FLEA MARKETS OR SALES CHECKED Poultry to be tested for pullorum typhoid are: exotic chickens, upland birds (chickens, pheasants, pea fowl, and backyard chickens). Must be identified with a leg band, wing band, or tattoo. Exemptions are those from a certified free NPIP flock or 90-day certificate test for pullorum typhoid. Water fowl need not test for pullorum typhoid unless they originate from out of state.