DOCSLIB.ORG

ACE Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ACE Appendix CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA August 13, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes .......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers ........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ............................................................................................................ 31 PG06 – Source Type Codes .................................................................................................................................. 35 PG06 – Ocean Geographic Area Codes ................................................................................................................ 36 PG06 – Processing Type Codes ............................................................................................................................ 37 PG07 – Item Identity Number Qualifiers .............................................................................................................. 50 PG10 – Category Type Codes............................................................................................................................... 51 PG10 – Category Codes ........................................................................................................................................ 53 PG10 – Commodity Qualifier Codes* .................................................................................................................. 73 PG10 – Commodity Characteristic Qualifiers ...................................................................................................... 78 PG14 – Type Codes ............................................................................................................................................ 244 PG14 – Exemption Codes ................................................................................................................................... 250 PG19 – Entity Role Codes .................................................................................................................................. 257 PG19 – Entity Identification Codes .................................................................................................................... 261 PG22 – Document Identifiers ............................................................................................................................. 263 PG22 – Declaration Codes .................................................................................................................................. 271 PG23 – Food & Drug Affirmation of Compliance ............................................................................................. 274 PG23 – Food & Drug Affirmation of Compliance Qualifier Codes ................................................................... 278 PG24 – Remarks Type Codes ............................................................................................................................. 279 PG24 – Remarks Codes ...................................................................................................................................... 280 PG26 – Unit of Measure ..................................................................................................................................... 284 PG30 – Inspection or Arrival Location Codes .................................................................................................... 290 PG31 – Commodity Harvesting Vessel Characteristic Type Codes ................................................................... 291 PG32 – Commodity Routing Type Codes .......................................................................................................... 292 PG60 – Additional Information Qualifier Codes ................................................................................................ 292 PG32 – Commodity Political Subunit of Routing Qualifier ............................................................................... 293 2 3 Table of Changes Change Change # Date Section(s) Affected Brief Description of Change 45 August 13, (A) PG23 FDA Affirmation of (A) Added codes: CAN and VFD (these are 2021 Compliance Codes existing codes that were missing from this document) 44 June 21, (A) PG26 APHIS Core – Units of (A) For APHIS Core, added Unit of Measure code 2021 Measure PKG = Package; Noted that PK = Package will be deprecated. 43 February (A) PG14 Type Codes (A) Added AE1 for APHIS Core; 12, 2021 Renamed title for A02 and A03 (B) PG14 Exemption Codes (B) Deleted AP2 (PPQ 525B-Soil Permit). (C) PG24 Remarks Type Code (C) Deleted AP5 (APHIS Form PPQ 526) 42 October 8, (A) PG01 FDA Processing Codes (A) Added 804 processing code for FDA DRU 2020 program (B) PG23 FDA Affirmation of (B) Added two FDA Affirmation of Compliance Compliance Codes: FSR and PRN 41 April 24, (A) PG10 Commodity Characteristics (A) For APHIS: Added codes DGSR, GOI and 2020 Qualifiers SHNY. Updated definition for PCSU (B) PG14 Type Codes (B) For AMS: Added code AM9. Updated Names for codes AM2 and AM3. 40 March 31, (A) PG01 Government Agency (A) For FWS: Added processing code LDS 2020 Processing Codes (B) PG22 Declaration Codes (B) For FWS: Removed codes FW1 and FW2, Updated language for code FW3 and changed code name for FW3 (C) PG05 Scientific Species Codes (C) For FWS: Removed FWS from the header so title reads, “Wildlife Category Codes” (D) PG14 Exemption Codes (D) For DDTC: Removed import exemption codes 126.4a, 126.4b, 126.4c. Added import exemption codes 126.4a1, 126.4a2, 126.4a3, 126.4a4, 126.4b1, 126.4b2, 126.4c1, 126.4c2. Removed export exemption codes 126.4a, 126.4c. Added export exemption codes 126.4a1, 126.4a2, 126.4a3, 126.4a4, 126.4b1, 126.4b2. 39 March 23, (A) PG05 FWS Wildlife Description (A) For FWS: changed codes cav100 and cav103 2020 Codes to CAVA100 and CAVA103. Added reference data codes EXTA100 and EXTA103. 38 February (A) PG10 Commodity Qualifier Codes (A) For APHIS: Added reference data for codes 19, 2020 A42 and A43. Removed discontinued code A40. (B) PG10 Commodity Characteristics (B) For APHIS: Added reference data for codes Qualifiers FCO, FGC, FSC, FBC, FCC, FGF, FTT, and FSF to subsection APHIS Characteristics – Live Animals (Breed / Variety A11). Removed subsection APHIS Characteristics – Propagative Material (Life Stage A40) including codes GRN, IMM and MAT. Added reference data for codes SEO, SLL, WIRT and WORT to subsection APHIS Characteristics – Propagative Material (Physical State A41) and removed codes AQG,AQP, BRT, DOB, DPE, EPG, EPH, LSL, MET, ROC, RTD, RTG, SEM, UNC, UNG and UNR. Added reference data for codes ARTI, BARE and SOIL to subsection APHIS Characteristics – Propagative Material (Growing Media A43) (C) PG10 Category Codes 4 (C) For APHIS: Added reference data for codes 404, 405, 406 and 407 to subsection APHIS Article Category – AP0400 (Propagative Material) and made changes to codes 401 and 402, adding new deifintions and titles. Removed reference data code 307 from subsection APHIS Article Category – AP0300 (Animal Products and By-Products) and code 115 from APHIS Article Category – AP0100 and added definition for code 119. Added reference data for codes 307A and 307B to subsection APHIS Article Category – AP0300 (D) PG14 Type Codes (Animal Products and By-Products). (D) For APHIS: Removed code A06 and added (E) PG19 Entity Role Codes codes A6A and A6B (F) PG01 Agency Program Codes (E) For APHIS: Added code AG1 (G) PG01 Government Agency (F) For AMS: Added code OR Processing Codes (G) For AMS: Added code 1 (H) PG14 Type Codes (I) PG19 Entity Role Codes (H) For AMS: Added code AM1 (J) PG22 Declaration Codes (I) For AMS: Added codes ORI and ORC (K) PG24 Remarks Type Code (J) For AMS: Added code AM4 (L) PG05 FWS Wildlife Description (K) For AMS: Added codes AM1, A10 and A11 Codes (L) For FWS: Added codes CAVA100, CAVA103, DERA100, DERA103, EGLA100, EGLA103, (M) PG19 Entity Role codes LIVA100, LIVA103, MEAA100 and MEAA103 (M) For FWS: Changed “FW2” to “FWE” and (N) PG14 LPCO Type Codes “FW1” to “FWI” (N) For FWS: Deleted “FWE – Foreign Wildlife Export Document” and changed “FWD” = FWS U.S. CITES Document ot “FWU” = FWS U.S. CITES Document 37 November, (A) PG14 LPCO Types (A) Changed meat certificate to Meat / Sanitary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breed Relationships and Definition in British Cattle
    Heredity (2004) 93, 597–602 & 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/04 $30.00 www.nature.com/hdy Breed relationships and definition in British cattle: a genetic analysis P Wiener, D Burton and JL Williams Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK The genetic diversity of eight British cattle breeds was not associated with geographical distribution. Analyses also quantified in this study. In all, 30 microsatellites from the FAO defined the cohesiveness or definition of the various breeds, panel of markers were used to characterise the DNA with Highland, Guernsey and Jersey as the best defined and samples from nearly 400 individuals. A variety of methods most distinctive of the breeds. were applied to analyse the data in order to look at diversity Heredity (2004) 93, 597–602. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800566 within and between breeds. The relationships between Publishedonline25August2004 breeds were not highly resolved and breed clusters were Keywords: British cattle; breeds; diversity; microsatellites Introduction 1997; MacHugh et al, 1994, 1998; Kantanen et al, 2000; Arranz et al, 2001; Bjrnstad and Red 2001; Beja-Pereira The concept of cattle breeds, rather than local types, is et al, 2003). said to have originated in Britain under the influence of The goal of this study was to use microsatellite Robert Bakewell in the 18th century (Porter, 1991). It was markers to characterise diversity levels within, and during that period that intensive culling and inbreeding relationships between, a number of British cattle breeds, became widespread in order to achieve specific breeding most of which have not been characterised previously.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Ungulate CAMP & Leopard, Tahr, and Oryx PHVA Final Report 2001.Pdf
    Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP) For The Arabian Ungulates and Leopard & Population and Habitat Viability Assessment (PHVA) For the Arabian Leopard, Tahr, and Arabian Oryx 1 © Copyright 2001 by CBSG. A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (SSC/IUCN). 2001. Conservation Assessment and Management Plan for the Arabian Leopard and Arabian Ungulates with Population and Habitat Viability Assessments for the Arabian Leopard, Arabian Oryx, and Tahr Reports. CBSG, Apple Valley, MN. USA. Additional copies of Conservation Assessment and Management Plan for the Arabian Leopard and Arabian Ungulates with Population and Habitat Viability Assessments for the Arabian Leopard, Arabian Oryx, and Tahr Reports can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124. USA. 2 Donor 3 4 Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP) For The Arabian Ungulates and Leopard & Population and Habitat Viability Assessment (PHVA) For the Arabian Leopard, Tahr, and Arabian Oryx TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: Executive Summary 5. SECTION 2: Arabian Gazelles Reports 18. SECTION 3: Tahr and Ibex Reports 28. SECTION 4: Arabian Oryx Reports 41. SECTION 5: Arabian Leopard Reports 56. SECTION 6: New IUCN Red List Categories & Criteria; Taxon Data Sheet; and CBSG Workshop Process. 66. SECTION 7: List of Participants 116. 5 6 Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP) For The Arabian Ungulates and Leopard & Population and Habitat Viability Assessment (PHVA) For the Arabian Leopard, Tahr, and Arabian Oryx SECTION 1 Executive Summary 7 8 Executive Summary The ungulates of the Arabian peninsula region - Arabian Oryx, Arabian tahr, ibex, and the gazelles - generally are poorly known among local communities and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • CATAIR Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA April 24, 2020 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes ............................................................................................................................................4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes .................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ............................................................................................. 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers .................................................................... 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ...................................................................................................................... 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers.................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure .............................................................................................................................. 30 PG05 – Scie nt if ic Spec ies Code .................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    3.2 Grazing animals used in projects 3.2.1 Species of gradng animals Some sites utilised more than one species of grazing animals so the results in Table 5 are based on 182 records. The majority of sites used sheep and/or cattle and these species were used on an almost equal number of sites, Ponies were also widely used but horses and goats were used infrequently and pigs were used on just 2 sites. No other species of grazing livestock was recorded (a mention of rabbits was taken to refer to wild populations). Table 5. Species of livestock used for grazing Sheep Cattle Equines Goats Pigs Number of Sites 71 72 30 7 2 Percentage of Records 39 40 16 4 I 3.2.2 Breeds of Sheep The breeds and crosses of sheep used are shown in Table 6. A surprisingly large number of 46 breeds or crosses were used on the 71 sites; the majority can be considered as commercial, although hardy, native breeds or crosses including hill breeds such as Cheviot, Derbyshire Gritstone, Herdwick, Scottish Blackface, Swaledale and Welsh Mountain, grassland breeds such as Beulah Speckled Face, Clun Forest, Jacob and Lleyn and down breeds such as Dorset (it was not stated whether this was Dorset Down or Dorset Horn), Hampshire Down and Southdown. Continental breeds were represented by Benichon du Cher, Bleu du Maine and Texel. Rare breeds (i.e. those included on the Rare Breeds Survival Trust’s priority and minority lists) were well represented by Hebridean, Leicester Longwool, Manx Loghtan, Portland, Shetland, Soay, Southdown, Teeswater and Wiltshire Horn.
    [Show full text]
  • An Early Turning Point in the History of the Crusades
    Jonathan Phillips. The Second Crusade: Extending the Frontiers of Christendom. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007. xxix + 364 pp. $40.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-300-11274-0. Reviewed by Jonathan R. Lyon Published on H-German (March, 2008) As the author makes clear in the excellent in‐ cepts could be employed against a variety of Latin troduction to this work, the Second Crusade Christendom's enemies. (1145-49) has typically not attracted as much in‐ Phillips divides his work into fourteen terest from modern historians as the more fa‐ chronologically-arranged chapters, although sepa‐ mous First Crusade (1095-99) and Third Crusade rate chapters treat the Iberian and Baltic compo‐ (1188-92). A key explanation for this trend is the nents of the crusade. The frst two chapters dis‐ Second Crusade's failure to make any significant cuss the period between the First and the Second gains for the Christians of the Holy Land in the Crusade; chapter 1 focuses on the various pilgrim‐ wake of the Muslim conquest of Edessa in 1144. ages and crusading efforts of the early twelfth Nevertheless, as Phillips convincingly argues, this century, and chapter 2 provides a rich, fascinating crusade--despite its lack of success--demands discussion of the powerful legacy the First Cru‐ more attention than it has received for several sade left to Latin Christian culture in the decades reasons. It was the frst crusade to the Holy Land after 1099. Phillips persuasively argues that this to involve western European kings and thus legacy had a significant impact on recruiting for forced rulers to consider the consequences of the Second Crusade, because the generation of leaving their kingdoms for months (if not years) young nobles alive in the 1140s had grown up at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • "First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    Country Report of Australia for the FAO First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1 ASSESSING THE STATE OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY THE FARM ANIMAL SECTOR IN AUSTRALIA.................................................................................7 1.1 OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND RELATED ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. ......................................................................................................7 Australian Agriculture - general context .....................................................................................7 Australia's agricultural sector: production systems, diversity and outputs.................................8 Australian livestock production ...................................................................................................9 1.2 ASSESSING THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF FARM ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY..............10 Major agricultural species in Australia.....................................................................................10 Conservation status of important agricultural species in Australia..........................................11 Characterisation and information systems ................................................................................12 1.3 ASSESSING THE STATE OF UTILISATION OF FARM ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN AUSTRALIA. ........................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Names and Denomination of Livonians in Early Written Sources
    ESUKA – JEFUL 2014, 5–1: 13–26 PERSONAL NAMES AND DENOMINATION OF LIVONIANS IN EARLY WRITTEN SOURCES Enn Ernits Estonian University of Life Sciences Abstract. This paper presents the timeline of ethnonyms denoting Livonians; specifies their chronology; and analyses the names used for this ethnos and possible personal names. If we consider the dating of the event, the earliest sources mentioning Livonians are Gesta Danorum and the Tale of Bygone Years (both 10th century), but both sources present rather dubious information: in the first the battle of Bråvalla itself or the date are dubious (6th, 8th or 10th century); in the latter we cannot be sure that the member of the Rus delegation was really a Livonian. If we consider the time of recording, the earliest sources are two rune inscriptions from Sweden (11th century), and the next is the list of neighbouring peoples of the Russians from the Tale of Bygone Years (12th century). The personal names Bicco and Ger referred in Gesta Danorum, and Либи Аръфастовъ in Tale of Bygone Years are very problematic. The first certain personal name of a Livonian is *Mustakka, *Mustukka or *Mustoikka (from Finnic *musta ‘black’) written in 1040–1050s on a strip of birch bark in Novgorod. Keywords: Livs, Finnic peoples, ethnonyms, anthroponyms, onomastics DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2014.5.1.01 1. Introduction This paper (1) seeks to present the timeline of ethnonyms denoting Livonians; (2) to specify their chronology; (3) and to analyse the names used for this ethnos and possible personal names. It is supple- mental to the paper by Mauno Koski on words denoting Livonians (Koski 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Charters: What Survives?
    Banner 4-final.qxp_Layout 1 01/11/2016 09:29 Page 1 Charters: what survives? Charters are our main source for twelh- and thirteenth-century Scotland. Most surviving charters were written for monasteries, which had many properties and privileges and gained considerable expertise in preserving their charters. However, many collections were lost when monasteries declined aer the Reformation (1560) and their lands passed to lay lords. Only 27% of Scottish charters from 1100–1250 survive as original single sheets of parchment; even fewer still have their seal attached. e remaining 73% exist only as later copies. Survival of charter collectionS (relating to 1100–1250) GEOGRAPHICAL SPREAD from inStitutionS founded by 1250 Our picture of documents in this period is geographically distorted. Some regions have no institutions with surviving charter collections, even as copies (like Galloway). Others had few if any monasteries, and so lacked large charter collections in the first place (like Caithness). Others are relatively well represented (like Fife). Survives Lost or unknown number of Surviving charterS CHRONOLOGICAL SPREAD (by earliest possible decade of creation) 400 Despite losses, the surviving documents point to a gradual increase Copies Originals in their use in the twelh century. 300 200 100 0 109 0s 110 0s 111 0s 112 0s 113 0s 114 0s 115 0s 116 0s 1170s 118 0s 119 0s 120 0s 121 0s 122 0s 123 0s 124 0s TYPES OF DONOR typeS of donor – Example of Melrose Abbey’s Charters It was common for monasteries to seek charters from those in Lay Lords Kings positions of authority in the kingdom: lay lords, kings and bishops.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    3.2.14 Origins of stock Question 13 on the questionnaire concerned the origins of the stock used and was an open question (although two examples (moor bred, rye/clover ley farmland) were given), In total 32 sources were suggested by respondents but to ease interpretation some have been grouped, Thus Box 6, which shows the origins of sheep used for conservation grazing, has 18 categories with, for example, unhproved grassland, lowland meadow and rough grassland grouped together as a single ‘origin’. Jt is possible that other categories overlap, e.g, improved grassland and ley farm or pasture. There are also differences in interpretation of origin between the habitat from which the sheep originated and the status (e*gLocal or National Nature Reserve) of the site hom which they came. ~ Box 6: Origins of stock used in conservation grazing schemes 1. Moor bred 10. Sand dunes 2. Hill/Upland 11. Home bred 3, Lowland 12. EarmLocal farm/smallholding 4. Ley farm / Organic hy 13. Local Nature Reserve 5. Improved grassland 14. National Nature Reserve 6. Pasturelpermanent pasture 15. Market 7. Unirrrproved grassland / 16. Conservation organisations/ Lowland meadow/Rough grassland reserve/National Park 8. Chalk grassland/calcareous grassland 17. Local school 9. Marsh 18. Various Despite these dficulties some indication of the sources of sheep used in conservation grazing schemes can be derived (Table 17). In total the origin of the sheep used was given for 39 breeds or crosses to give 88 site/breed/origin combinations, The most frequently stated origin was ‘moor bred’, recorded for sheep at 18 sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Tahr in Oman Paul Munton
    Arabian Tahr in Oman Paul Munton Arabian tahr are confined to Oman, with a population of under 2000. Unlike other tahr species, which depend on grass, Arabian tahr require also fruits, seeds and young shoots. The areas where these can be found in this arid country are on certain north-facing mountain slopes with a higher rainfall, and it is there that reserves to protect this tahr must be made. The author spent two years in Oman studying the tahr. The Arabian tahr Hemitragus jayakari today survives only in the mountains of northern Oman. A goat-like animal, it is one of only three surviving species of a once widespread genus; the other two are the Himalayan and Nilgiri tahrs, H. jemlahicus and H. hylocrius. In recent years the government of the Sultanate of Oman has shown great interest in the country's wildlife, and much conservation work has been done. From April 1976 to April 1978 I was engaged jointly by the Government, WWF and IUCN on a field study of the tahr's ecology, and in January 1979 made recommendations for its conservation, which were presented to the Government. Arabian tahr differ from the other tahrs in that they feed selectively on fruits, seeds and young shoots as well as grass. Their optimum habitat is found on the north-facing slopes of the higher mountain ranges of northern Oman, where they use all altitudes between sea level and 2000 metres. But they prefer the zone between 1000 and 1800m where the vegetation is especially diverse, due to the special climate of these north-facing slopes, with their higher rainfall, cooler temperatures, and greater shelter from the sun than in the drought conditions that are otherwise typical of this arid zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Ipts Jrc 80420 (Online).Pdf
    LF-NA-25911-EN-N European Commission As the Commission's in-house science service, the Joint Research Centre's mission is to provide EU policies with independent, evidence-based scientific and technical support throughout the whole policy cycle. Working in close cooperation with policy Directorates-General, the JRC addresses key societal challenges while stimulating innovation through developing new standards, methods and tools, and sharing and transferring its know-how to the Member States and international community. Key policy areas include: environment and climate change; energy and transport; agriculture and food security; health and consumer protection; information society and digital agenda; safety and security including nuclear; all supported through a cross-cutting and multi-disciplinary approach. Short Food Supply Chains and Local Food Systems in the EU. A State of Play of their Socio-Economic Characteristics. Authors: Moya Kneafsey, Laura Venn, Ulrich Schmutz, Bálint Balázs, Liz Trenchard, Trish Eyden-Wood, Elizabeth ate of Play their Socio-Economic Characteristics. Bos, Gemma Sutton, Matthew Blackett Editors: Fabien Santini, Sergio Gomez y Paloma 2013 Short Food Supply Chains and Local Systems in the EU. A St Report EUR 25911 EN JRC 80420 ONLINE.indd 1 24/05/13 16:38 European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Contact information European Commission Address: Edificio Expo. c/ Inca Garcilaso, 3. E-41092 Seville (Spain) EUR 25911 - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Prospective Technological Studies E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +34 954488318 Title: Short Food Supply Chains and Local Food Systems in the EU. A State of Play of their Socio-Economic Characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwartheg Prydeinig Prin (Ba R) Cattle - Gwartheg
    GWARTHEG PRYDEINIG PRIN (BA R) CATTLE - GWARTHEG Aberdeen Angus (Original Population) – Aberdeen Angus (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Belted Galloway – Belted Galloway British White – Gwyn Prydeinig Chillingham – Chillingham Dairy Shorthorn (Original Population) – Byrgorn Godro (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol). Galloway (including Black, Red and Dun) – Galloway (gan gynnwys Du, Coch a Llwyd) Gloucester – Gloucester Guernsey - Guernsey Hereford Traditional (Original Population) – Henffordd Traddodiadol (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Highland - Yr Ucheldir Irish Moiled – Moel Iwerddon Lincoln Red – Lincoln Red Lincoln Red (Original Population) – Lincoln Red (Poblogaeth Wreiddiol) Northern Dairy Shorthorn – Byrgorn Godro Gogledd Lloegr Red Poll – Red Poll Shetland - Shetland Vaynol –Vaynol White Galloway – Galloway Gwyn White Park – Gwartheg Parc Gwyn Whitebred Shorthorn – Byrgorn Gwyn Version 2, February 2020 SHEEP - DEFAID Balwen - Balwen Border Leicester – Border Leicester Boreray - Boreray Cambridge - Cambridge Castlemilk Moorit – Castlemilk Moorit Clun Forest - Fforest Clun Cotswold - Cotswold Derbyshire Gritstone – Derbyshire Gritstone Devon & Cornwall Longwool – Devon & Cornwall Longwool Devon Closewool - Devon Closewool Dorset Down - Dorset Down Dorset Horn - Dorset Horn Greyface Dartmoor - Greyface Dartmoor Hill Radnor – Bryniau Maesyfed Leicester Longwool - Leicester Longwool Lincoln Longwool - Lincoln Longwool Llanwenog - Llanwenog Lonk - Lonk Manx Loaghtan – Loaghtan Ynys Manaw Norfolk Horn - Norfolk Horn North Ronaldsay / Orkney - North Ronaldsay / Orkney Oxford Down - Oxford Down Portland - Portland Shropshire - Shropshire Soay - Soay Version 2, February 2020 Teeswater - Teeswater Wensleydale – Wensleydale White Face Dartmoor – White Face Dartmoor Whitefaced Woodland - Whitefaced Woodland Yn ogystal, mae’r bridiau defaid canlynol yn cael eu hystyried fel rhai wedi’u hynysu’n ddaearyddol. Nid ydynt wedi’u cynnwys yn y rhestr o fridiau prin ond byddwn yn eu hychwanegu os bydd nifer y mamogiaid magu’n cwympo o dan y trothwy.
    [Show full text]