An Agricultural Survey of the Northern Province

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Agricultural Survey of the Northern Province alANNINI FetV Item Or ry6MiCSI Rit .W LTURAL LIBRARY An Agricultural Survey of the Northern Province The counties of Durham, Northumberland, Cumberland, Westmorland By J. A. HANLEY, A. L. BOYD and W. WILLIAMSON Department of Agriculture, [Armstrong College, Newcastle upon Tyne 1936 An Agricultural Survey of the Northern Province The counties of Durham, Northumberland, Cumberland, Westmorland By J. A. HANLEY, A. L. BOYD and W. WILLIAMSON Department of Agriculture, Armstrong College, Newcastle upon Tyne 1936 CONTENTS PAGE Part 1.—Introduction .... ... 5' Part 2.—Topography and Climate .. 8 Part 3.—Sub-division of the Northern Province into districts of similar farming types and possibilities .... 15 Part 4.—The Agriculture of each district: District I. Tweedside •••• . .. 21 5, II. The Cheviot Hills . 26 III. East of Wooler •••• .. 29 55 IV. Bamburgh .... ... 32 55 V. Coquetdale .... •••• .... 36 55 VI. Morpeth—Alnwick (west of Great' North Road) .... •••• 38 55 VII. Morpeth—Alnwick (east of Great North Road) •••• .. 40 55 VIII. Otterburn—Bewcastle . 47 55 IX. Morpeth.—Hexham .... .. 53 55 X. Newcastle and Durham . •• 57 55 XI. The Solway Strip .... ... 61 5, XII. Wigton 70 55 XIII. Brampton .... 75 75 XIV. Cockermouth ... .. • •• 78 55 XV. Seascale 84 52 XVI. The Lake District 88 55 XVII. The Eden Valley .. .. •••• 90 55 XVIIIA West Durham and Hexhamshire .... 91 55 XVIIIB. The Pennines .. ••• . 98 5, XIX. Darlington .... .. •• •••. 100 XX. Kendal . .. .... 104 Part 5.—The location of non-statutory small-holdings •••. 109 Part 6.—Distribution of electricity •••• •••• •••• .... 115 Part 7.—Some conclusions •••• ••• •••• •••• .••• 119 PART I. INTRODUCTION. The need for more precise information about the possibilities of developing a more intensive agriculture (including horticulture) in various parts of the country, became apparent during conferences on large-scale land settlement. It is not intended to discuss here a question which has called forth such widely different views on an economic problem of considerable national as well as local importance, but if British agriculture is to be planned along lines which will make for a better and more reasonable, and altogether more desirable utilisation of our land, some systematic survey of the possibilities of each district is essential. More recently this need has been further emphasised as a result of the far-reaching suggestions on necessary improvements in the diets of those people existing on low scales of family income and on the question of a safe food supply in times of national danger. The need is pressing for increased consumption— and therefore home-production—of protective portions of the human diet such as live-stock products and fruit and vegetables. Further, increased live-stock farming will ensure a larger area of grass land of a quality fit to plough out at short notice for wheat growing. The work here described was made possible by the generosity of the Rt. Hon. David Lloyd George, 0.M., M.P., who provided the money necessary for this comparatively quick survey of the Northern Province. The grant to the College funds was quite unconditional and no restrictions were placed on the publication of the results nor on the uses to which they might be put. Recent requests from various sources for information on the general position of the agricultural industry in the Northern Province, the possibilities of its absorbing more labour, and the future prospects of small-holders have merely emphasised the lack of specific evidence, and the inadequacy of the samples available for the determination• of reliable data. Mr. D. H. Dinsdale, Adviser in Agricultural Economics at Armstrong College, submitted memoranda for the industrial economic surveys of the North-east Coast and Cumberland and Furness carried out from 1931 to 1933. A report was also prepared for the same purpose on the horticultural possibilities of Cumberland by Mr. Brooks, of Newton. Rigg Farm School, Penrith. The memoranda covered the following points For the North-east Coast Area :— (1) Brief descriptive account of the agriculture of the area. (2) The trend of employment in agriculture in the area. (3) The changing emphasis in farming in the area during the post-war period. (4) Future possibilities. For the survey of Cumberland and Furness:— (1) The course of agricultural prices. (2) The trend in agricultural development. (3) The trend in agricultural employment. (4) The future outlook. 5 And by Mr. H. E. Brooks:— The Prospect of increasing Horticulture in Cumberland." More recent work of a survey character has dealt with Poultry Enterprises, and a report embodying the results of surveys covering the Northern and West Midland Provinces was published in 1935. Soil survey work in Northumberland began in 1935, and the first maps and work on modern soil survey methods will be ready in 1936-37. The land utilisation survey has already covered a good deal of the Province, and some maps have already been published. Extension of the work by following up the general survey and obtaining more sr- geographical and agricultural details is proceeding. At the commencement of this agricultural survey, however, it was felt that the most valuable preliminary information would be con- cerned with questions of adaptability of land, farms and farmers to changes in methods or intensification of land utilisation, so it was decided to determine first the extent of areas of similar farming types and possibilities within the Province. Armstrong College, Newcastle-on-Tyne, is the agricultural advisory centre for the Northern Province, consisting of the counties of Durham, Northumberland, Cumberland and Westmorland. The funds provided were sufficient to cover the cost of one year's work, employing two field workers, whose chief duties were to obtain data from farms. Obviously no adequate survey of the economics of farms in the area was possible in the time. The intention was to obtain all the informa- tion possible on the farm practice as it exists now, how it has reacted to the post-war conditions, the adaptability of land and farmer and farm worker, and the possibility of putting the land to fuller use. A surveyor, who was familiar with the farming of Durham and Northumberland, took over the eastern portion of the Province, whilst the western portion was in the hands of a surveyor brought up on a farm in Cumberland, and very familiar with farm practice in that county. The main points taken into consideration were :— FARMS A.—TYPE OF HOLDING 1. Some general ideas on sizes of holdings, e.g., (a) less than 50 acres;(b) 50-100 acres; (c) 100-300 acres;(d) over 300 acres. 2. Intensity of cropping and stocking. 3. Influence of quality of land, exposure to weather, farm steadings, or methods of farming on 2. B.—LIVE-STOCK 1. Kinds of live-stock kept with special reference to poultry, pigs, dairy cows. 2. Animal products sold off, i.e., milk; eggs; fat poultry; pork or bacon pigs; store pigs; cattle or sheep; fat lambs, sheep or cattle. 3. Breeds and crosses used, and systems of managing live-stock. C.—CROPS a 1. Rotations. 2. Arable crops grown, with special reference to potatoes; wheat; sugar beet; market garden and glass house crops, and any unusual crops. Varieties used. 6 3. Quality of grass land. 4. Types of rough grazings, whether heather, bracken, white bent, etc. 5. Afforestation. D.-1. Approximate rents or land values. 2. Fences. 3. Buildings. SOILS 1. General description. 2. Inherent defects, e.g., wetness, acidity, etc. 3. Defects caused by colliery subsidence, smoke, etc. WATER SUPPLIES 1. Sources of water. 2. Drought effects. ECONOMIC FACTORS 1. Extent of industries other than agriculture providing consum- ing areas. 2. Skill of people in rural industries including arable cropping, milking, milk products, calf rearing, sheep, beef produc- tion, poultry, pigs, vegetables, flowers, etc. 3. Presence of agricultural factories. 4. Markets. 5. Communications. 6. Availability of electricity, coal, etc. METEOROLOGICAL DATA 1. Rainfall. 2. Drought. 3. Frost. The farms were taken more or less at random, and we are indebted to all those farmers who helped us by providing so much information, some of it of a confidential nature; without their co-operation the survey would scarcely have been possible. We have details of the management of about 600 farms for the whole Province and descriptions of a still larger number of soils. Special attention was given to recent changes in farming methods. The information collected has enabled us to sub-divide the area into twenty districts, according to the farming systems, including recent developments and adaptability. It is not claimed that the boundaries are exact. In many cases they must be arbitrary and always elastic; every district contains farms which have broken away from the general local custom. PART 2 TOPOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE The area covered by the survey consists of the Northern Province of the Ministry of Agriculture's Advisory Scheme, an area which shows very considerable topographical differences. The essential f acts may be stated briefly, by referring to the, three hill regions : the Cheviots in the north, the northern Pennines in the centre and the Cumbrian Hills in the west. To the east is the coastal plain extending from the Tees to Berwick-on-Tweed, gradually rising to the foot-hills of the Cheviots and the Pennines westwards. The Cumbrian group of mountains is separated from the Pennines by the Valley of the Eden. To the north of the Cumbrian group there is the low Carlisle Plain, and further south the coastal strip extending from Maryport through Whitehaven and Ravenglass to Millom. This strip is, for the most part, very narrow, the mountains approaching the coast in the southern portion of it. The low land on the east side is generally more uniform in character than the low land in the west, and it is, of course, unpro- tected from winds from the easterly points of the compass.
Recommended publications
  • Mavis Dixon VAD Database.Xlsx
    County Durham Voluntary Aid Detachment workers, 1914-1919 www.durhamatwar.org.uk Surname Forename Address Role Further information Service from 2/1915 to 12/1915 and 7/1916 to 8/1917. 13th Durham Margaret Ann Mount Stewart St., V.A.H., Vane House, Seaham Harbour. Husband George William, Coal Lacey Nurse. Part time. 1610 hours worked. (Mrs) Dawdon Miner/Stoneman, son Benjamin. Born Felling c1880. Married 1901 Easington District – maiden name McElwee. Bon Accord, Foggy Furze, Service from 12/1915 to date. 8th Durham V.A.H., Normanhurst, West Ladyman Grace Cook. Part time. 2016 hours worked. West Hartlepool Hartlepool. Not in Hartlepool 1911. C/o Mrs. Atkinson, Service from 1915 to 1/1917. 17th Durham V.A.H., The Red House, Laidler Mary E Wellbank, Morpeth. Sister. Full time. Paid. Etherley, Bishop Auckland. Too many on 1911 census to get a safe Crossed out on the card. match. Service from 1/11/1918 to 1/4/1919. Oulton Hall (Officers’ Hospital), C/o Mrs J Watson, 39 High Waitress. Pay - £26 per annum. Full Laine Emily Leeds. Attd. Military Hospital, Ripon 6/1918 and 7/1918. Not in Crook Jobs Hill, Crook time. on 1911 census. 7 Thornhill Park, Kitchen helper. 30 hours alternate Service from 12/1917 to 2/1919. 3rd Durham V.A.H., Hammerton Laing E. Victoria Sunderland weeks. House, 4 Gray Road, Sunderland. Unable to trace 1911 census. Lake Frank West Park Road, Cleadon Private. Driver. Service from 30/2/1917 to 1919. Unable to trace 1911 census. 15 Rowell St., West Service from 19/2/1917 to 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • "First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    Country Report of Australia for the FAO First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1 ASSESSING THE STATE OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY THE FARM ANIMAL SECTOR IN AUSTRALIA.................................................................................7 1.1 OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND RELATED ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. ......................................................................................................7 Australian Agriculture - general context .....................................................................................7 Australia's agricultural sector: production systems, diversity and outputs.................................8 Australian livestock production ...................................................................................................9 1.2 ASSESSING THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF FARM ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY..............10 Major agricultural species in Australia.....................................................................................10 Conservation status of important agricultural species in Australia..........................................11 Characterisation and information systems ................................................................................12 1.3 ASSESSING THE STATE OF UTILISATION OF FARM ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN AUSTRALIA. ........................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • SAUID Exchange Name FTTC/P Available County Or Unitary Authority
    SAUID Exchange Name FTTC/P Available County or Unitary Authority EMABRIP ABBOTS RIPTON FTTC/P Now Huntingdonshire District SWABT ABERCYNON FTTC/P Now Rhondda, Cynon, Taf - Rhondda, Cynon, Taff SWAA ABERDARE FTTC Now Rhondda, Cynon, Taf - Rhondda, Cynon, Taff NSASH ABERDEEN ASHGROVE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSBLG ABERDEEN BALGOWNIE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSBDS ABERDEEN BIELDSIDE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSCTR ABERDEEN CULTER FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSDEN ABERDEEN DENBURN FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSKNC ABERDEEN KINCORTH FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSKGW ABERDEEN KINGSWELLS FTTC Now Aberdeenshire NSLNG ABERDEEN LOCHNAGAR FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSNTH ABERDEEN NORTH FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSPRT ABERDEEN PORTLETHEN FTTC Now Aberdeenshire NSWES ABERDEEN WEST FTTC Now Aberdeen City WNADV ABERDOVEY FTTC/P Now Gwynedd - Gwynedd SWAG ABERGAVENNY FTTC Now Sir Fynwy - Monmouthshire SWAAZ ABERKENFIG FTTC Now Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr - Bridgend WNASO ABERSOCH FTTC/P Now Gwynedd - Gwynedd SWABD ABERTILLERY FTTC/P Now Blaenau Gwent - Blaenau Gwent WNAE ABERYSTWYTH FTTC/P Now Sir Ceredigion - Ceredigion SMAI ABINGDON FTTC & FoD Now Vale of White Horse District THAG ABINGER FTTC Now Guildford District (B) SSABS ABSON FTTC Now South Gloucestershire LCACC ACCRINGTON FTTC Now Hyndburn District (B) EAACL ACLE FTTC Now Broadland District CMACO ACOCKS GREEN FTTC & FoD Now Birmingham District (B) MYACO ACOMB FTTC & FoD Now York (B) LWACT ACTON FTTC Now Ealing London Boro SMAD ADDERBURY FTTC Now Cherwell District LSADD ADDISCOMBE FTTC Now Croydon London Boro MYADE ADEL FTTC & FoD
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report APL Project 2017/2217
    Review of the scientific literature and the international pig welfare codes and standards to underpin the future Standards and Guidelines for Pigs Final Report APL Project 2017/2217 August 2018 Animal Welfare Science Centre, University of Melbourne Dr Lauren Hemsworth Prof Paul Hemsworth Ms Rutu Acharya Mr Jeremy Skuse 21 Bedford St North Melbourne, VIC 3051 1 Disclaimer: APL shall not be responsible in any manner whatsoever to any person who relies, in whole or in part, on the contents of this report unless authorised in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of APL. Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 1. Animal welfare and its assessment ...................................................................................... 12 2. Purpose of this Review and the Australian Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals – Pigs .......................................................................................................................... 19 3. Housing and management of pigs ....................................................................................... 22 3.1 Gestating sows (including gilts) ......................................................................................... 23 3.2 Farrowing/lactating sow and piglets, including painful husbandry practices ................... 35 3.3 Weaner and growing-finishing pigs ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Farming and Biodiversity of Pigs in Bhutan
    Animal Genetic Resources, 2011, 48, 47–61. © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011 doi:10.1017/S2078633610001256 Farming and biodiversity of pigs in Bhutan K. Nidup1,2, D. Tshering3, S. Wangdi4, C. Gyeltshen5, T. Phuntsho5 and C. Moran1 1Centre for Advanced Technologies in Animal Genetics and Reproduction (REPROGEN), Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Australia; 2College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan, Lobesa, Bhutan; 3Department of Livestock, National Pig Breeding Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Thimphu, Bhutan; 4Department of Livestock, Regional Pig and Poultry Breeding Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Lingmithang, Bhutan; 5Department of Livestock, Regional Pig and Poultry Breeding Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Gelephu, Bhutan Summary Pigs have socio-economic and cultural importance to the livelihood of many Bhutanese rural communities. While there is evidence of increased religious disapproval of pig raising, the consumption of pork, which is mainly met from imports, is increasing every year. Pig development activities are mainly focused on introduction of exotic germplasm. There is an evidence of a slow but steady increase in the population of improved pigs in the country. On the other hand, indigenous pigs still comprise 68 percent of the total pig population but their numbers are rapidly declining. If this trend continues, indigenous pigs will become extinct within the next 10 years. Once lost, this important genetic resource is largely irreplaceable. Therefore, Government of Bhutan must make an effort to protect, promote and utilize indigenous pig resources in a sustainable manner. In addition to the current ex situ conservation programme based on cryopre- servation of semen, which needs strengthening, in situ conservation and a nucleus farm is required to combat the enormous decline of the population of indigenous pigs and to ensure a sustainable source of swine genetic resources in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Chester-Le-Street/Durham
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review DISTRICT OF CHESTER LE STREET; CITY OF DURHAM LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION fc'Oll ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell FRIGS FSVA MEMBERS Lady Ackner Mr T Brockbank DL Professor G E Cherry Mi- K J L Newell Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT BACKGROUND 1. In a letter dated 20 March 198! the Chester-le-Street District Council invited us to make proposals for certain changes to the boundary of their district with the district of the City of Durham. The suggestion for changes had arisen during the course of the review by the District Council of the parish pattern in their area and involved the parishes of Plawsworth and Sacriston. Durham City Council had not at that stage completed their own parish review, but it was clear that the changes concerned were not supported by them or by the councils of the three parishes in their district which would be involved - Framwellgate Moor, Kimblesworth and Witton Gilbert. We decided to defer action on the matter until we had received Durham City Council's parish review report. ?., In submitting their report in August 1982 Durham City Council opposed all the district boundary changes suggested by Chester-le-Street District Council; Kimblesworth Parish Council wrote to us separately to emphasise their opposition to the ones affecting then. The City Council sent us a copy of a letter from the Durham County Council, however, which said, in relation to the possibility of changes in th^ Kimblesworth Parish boundary, that the Council considered that the villages of Kimblesworth and Nettlesworth (the latter currently in Plawsworth Parish, Chester-le-Street) should be treated as one settlement and that future development should be in relation to a single local plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Incident County Incident Unitary Incident District Air Env
    Event No. Reported Date Incident Operational Region Incident Operational Area Grid Ref (Confirmed) Incident County Incident Unitary Incident District Air Env. Impact Level Land Env. Impact Level Water Env. Impact Level 846879 02/01/2011 Anglian Region Eastern - Anglian TQ 66434 97092 ESSEX COUNTY BASILDON DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 3 (Minor) Category 4 (No Impact) 846894 02/01/2011 Anglian Region Eastern - Anglian TL 82512 22196 ESSEX COUNTY BRAINTREE DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 3 (Minor) Category 4 (No Impact) 847227 04/01/2011 North East Region North East NZ 24003 72931 NORTH TYNESIDE DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) 847235 04/01/2011 Midlands Region Central - Midlands SK 35427 00150 LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) 847343 05/01/2011 North East Region Yorkshire SE 25000 19878 KIRKLEES DISTRICT Category 3 (Minor) Category 3 (Minor) Category 3 (Minor) 847387 05/01/2011 North East Region North East NZ 28110 71717 NORTH TYNESIDE DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) 847450 05/01/2011 South West Region Devon and Cornwall SX 00120 60440 CORNWALL COUNTY RESTORMEL DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 3 (Minor) Category 4 (No Impact) 847839 06/01/2011 South West Region Wessex ST 78973 14684 DORSET COUNTY NORTH DORSET DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 3 (Minor) Category 4 (No Impact) 847919 07/01/2011 Midlands Region Central - Midlands
    [Show full text]
  • PDF (Volume 2)
    Durham E-Theses Local governance, governmental practices, and the production of policy: local strategic partnerships and area-based 'multiple deprivation' in County Durham Scott, David John How to cite: Scott, David John (2008) Local governance, governmental practices, and the production of policy: local strategic partnerships and area-based 'multiple deprivation' in County Durham, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2229/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Local Governance, Governmental Practices, and the Production of Policy: Local Strategic Partnerships and Area-Based 'Multiple Deprivation' in County Durham Volume 2 of 2 David John Scott Ph.D. thesis The copyright of this thesis rests with the author or the university to which it was submitted. No quotation from it, or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author or university, and any information derived from it should be acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Report
    EXHIBIT A ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK & POULTRY COMMISSION #1 NATURAL RESOURCES DR. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 501-907-2400 Complaint Report Type of Complaint Received By Date Assigned To COMPLAINANT PREMISES VISITED/SUSPECTED VIOLATOR Name Name Address Address City City Phone Phone Inspector/Investigator's Findings: Signed Date Return to Heath Harris, Field Supervisor DP-7/DP-46 SPECIAL MATERIALS & MARKETPLACE SAMPLE REPORT ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD Pesticide Division #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Insp. # Case # Lab # DATE: Sampled: Received: Reported: Sampled At Address GPS Coordinates: N W This block to be used for Marketplace Samples only Manufacturer Address City/State/Zip Brand Name: EPA Reg. #: EPA Est. #: Lot #: Container Type: # on Hand Wt./Size #Sampled Circle appropriate description: [Non-Slurry Liquid] [Slurry Liquid] [Dust] [Granular] [Other] Other Sample Soil Vegetation (describe) Description: (Place check in Water Clothing (describe) appropriate square) Use Dilution Other (describe) Formulation Dilution Rate as mixed Analysis Requested: (Use common pesticide name) Guarantee in Tank (if use dilution) Chain of Custody Date Received by (Received for Lab) Inspector Name Inspector (Print) Signature Check box if Dealer desires copy of completed analysis 9 ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY COMMISSION #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 (501) 225-1598 REPORT ON FLEA MARKETS OR SALES CHECKED Poultry to be tested for pullorum typhoid are: exotic chickens, upland birds (chickens, pheasants, pea fowl, and backyard chickens). Must be identified with a leg band, wing band, or tattoo. Exemptions are those from a certified free NPIP flock or 90-day certificate test for pullorum typhoid. Water fowl need not test for pullorum typhoid unless they originate from out of state.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA August 13, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes .......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers ........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Readings on the History and Use of Old Livestock Breeds
    NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL LIBRARY ARCHIVED FILE Archived files are provided for reference purposes only. This file was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Content may not appear in full or in its original format. All links external to the document have been deactivated. For additional information, see http://pubs.nal.usda.gov. Selected Readings on the History and Use of Old Livestock Breeds United States Department of Agriculture Selected Readings on the History and Use of Old Livestock Breeds National Agricultural Library September 1991 Animal Welfare Information Center By: Jean Larson Janice Swanson D'Anna Berry Cynthia Smith Animal Welfare Information Center National Agricultural Library U.S. Department of Agriculture And American Minor Breeds Conservancy P.O. Box 477 Pittboro, NC 27312 Acknowledgement: Jennifer Carter for computer and technical support. Published by: U. S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Library Animal Welfare Information Center Beltsville, Maryland 20705 Contact us: http://awic.nal.usda.gov/contact-us Web site: www.nal.usda.gov/awic Published in cooperation with the Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine Policies and Links Introduction minorbreeds.htm[1/15/2015 2:16:51 PM] Selected Readings on the History and Use of Old Livestock Breeds For centuries animals have worked with and for people. Cattle, goats, sheep, pigs, poultry and other livestock have been an essential part of agriculture and our history as a nation. With the change of agriculture from a way of life to a successful industry, we are losing our agricultural roots. Although we descend from a nation of farmers, few of us can name more than a handful of livestock breeds that are important to our production of food and fiber.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Farmer-Stockman Reaches REGISTERED HAMPSHIRE Rams for Sale—Jim Good Home
    ■ I s r ■ a m. E APPALOOSAS & P.O.A.s, Stud Prospects, 4-H WESTERN MONTANA—$25,000 down payment colts. Fillies and mares. Cecil Bilbre, Choteau, buys beautiful ranch including 200 top Hereford O I o e Montana. Phone 466-2246. _____________ cows, full line machinery, 800 tons hay, supplies and tools. Owner retiring—will leave his capi­ 4 I ONE “SHETLAND STALLION, registered. Cres­ j cent Breeding—gentle. Hazel French, Route 1, tal invested in the ranch. Location incomparable —within walking distance of grade and high Lewistown. Montana. _________________________ schools. Easy operation—good fall and winter i •BUYING SHEEP ___________ grazing. Private (free) water rights. Very low a/Cs, jot CHOICE PUREBRED HAMPSHIRE rams for taxes. Two modern homes. Heavy calves. This I •SELLING sale, lambs and yearlings. Mt. Haggin Breeding. is a top outfit. FISHER REALTY, Phone 745- Harry Miller, Star Route, Bozeman. Montana. 3101. St. Ignatius. Montana._______________________ K TOP GROCERY $200,000 volume. 175 acre river 3 FOR SALE—70 head ewes, 2 to 4 years old, •TRADING bottom, sprinkler system, business machines- $15.00 per head. Andrew Teterud, Dixon, Mon­ ; I tana. Phone 726-3126. __________________________________ office furniture, a money maker. Exclusive mu­ i sic store. Motel priced low. 40 acre river front, The rate is very low for our big circulation. Montana Farmer-Stockman reaches REGISTERED HAMPSHIRE rams for sale—Jim good home. 540 acre wheat farm, creek, modern I nearly nine out of every ten farm and ranch families in Montana with additional Moore, Rt. No. 2, Belgrade, Montana. Phone home.
    [Show full text]